throbber

`
` Paper 15
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: August 7, 2020
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. AND WATSON
`LABORATORIES, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2020-01045
`Patent 7,326,708 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN, ROBERT A. POLLOCK, and
`TIMOTHY G. MAJORS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MAJORS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Emily L. Rapalino
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01045
`Patent 7,326,708 B2
`On July 27, 2020, Teva Phamaceuticals USA, Inc. and Watson
`Laboratories, Inc. (collectively “Petitioner”) filed a motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Emily L. Rapalino in the above-identified proceeding
`(“Motion” or “Mot.”). Paper 11.1 Petitioner states that “Patent Owner
`consents to this Motion.” Mot. 1. The Motion is granted.
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause. In
`authorizing a motion for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires the
`moving party to provide a statement of facts showing there is good cause for
`the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice and an affidavit or declaration
`of the individual seeking to appear in the proceeding. See Paper 6, 2 (citing
`Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB
`Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7) (representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission”)) (“Notice”).
`In its Motion, Petitioner states that there is good cause for the Board
`to recognize Emily L. Rapalino pro hac vice during this proceeding because
`she is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established familiarity
`with the precise subject matter at issue in this proceeding. Mot. 2–3.
`The Motion is supported by a Declaration (Ex. 1018) (“Decl.”) of
`Emily L. Rapalino, attesting to the Motion’s statement of material facts and
`complying with the requirements set forth in the Notice. See Decl. ¶¶ 1–11.
`Upon consideration, Petitioner has demonstrated that Ms. Rapalino
`has sufficient legal and technical qualifications and familiarity with the
`subject matter at issue, and that there is a need for Petitioner to have counsel
`
`1 We cite to Papers and Exhibits (“Ex.”) in IPR2020-01045.
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01045
`Patent 7,326,708 B2
`with her experience. See id. ¶¶ 1–5; Mot. 2–3. Peititioner therefore has
`established good cause for admitting Ms. Rapalino pro hac vice in this
`proceeding.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for pro hac vice admission of
`Emily L. Rapalino for this proceeding is granted; Ms. Rapalino is
`authorized to act as back-up counsel in this proceeding only;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must file, within ten (10)
`business days, updated mandatory notices in this proceeding, identifying
`Ms. Rapalino as back-up counsel in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3);
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must file, within ten (10)
`business days, a power of attorney in this proceeding for Ms. Rapalino in
`accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b);
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for this proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Rapalino is to comply with the
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide, 84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019), and
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37,
`Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Rapalino is subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the USPTO Rules of
`Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01045
`Patent 7,326,708 B2
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Keith A. Zullow
`Sarah J. Fischer
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`kzullow@goodwinprocter.com
`sfischer@goodwinprocter.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Stanley E. Fisher
`Jessamyn S. Berniker
`Shaun P. Mahaffy
`Anthony H. Sheh
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`sfisher@wc.com
`jberniker@wc.com
`smahaffy@wc.com
`asheh@wc.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket