throbber

`
`
`
`
` Paper 34
` Date: November 26, 2021
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HP INC., 1
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SYNKLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2020-01031 (Patent 10,015,254 B1)
`IPR2020-01032 (Patent 10,015,254 B1)2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, and SCOTT
`RAEVSKY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s
`Motions to Seal
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5, 42.14, 42.54
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Microsoft Corporation was terminated from the proceeding. Paper 31 in
`both proceedings.
`2 We exercise our discretion to issue one combined Decision to be filed in
`each case.
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01031 (Patent 10,015,254 B1)
`IPR2020-01032 (Patent 10,015,254 B1)
`
`
`
`Motions to Seal
`In its unopposed Motions to Seal, Patent Owner seeks to seal Exhibits
`2029 and 2030. Paper 18 (“PO Mot.”).3 Patent Owner represents that Exhibit
`2030 is a license agreement with a third party licensee and “is confidential by
`its terms.” Id. at 3. 4 Patent Owner represents that Exhibit 2029 is an
`“associated claim chart,” that apparently includes information of the third
`party’s product. Id. at 2. Patent Owner argues that making either exhibit
`public “would potentially vitiate the license as a possible breach thereof
`and/or expose PO to liability.” Id. at 3.
`There is a strong public policy that favors making information filed in
`an inter partes review open to the public. Garmin Int’l, Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed
`Techs. LLC, IPR2012-00001, Paper 34, 1–2 (PTAB Mar. 14, 2013). The
`standard for granting a motion to seal is good cause. 37 C.F.R. § 42.54. That
`standard includes showing that the information addressed in the motion to seal
`is truly confidential, and that such confidentiality outweighs the strong public
`interest in having the record open to the public. See Garmin at 2–3.
`We have considered the arguments presented by Patent Owner and
`determine that good cause has been established for sealing the documents
`identified. Specifically, Patent Owner demonstrates that the information
`sought to be sealed per the motions contains confidential information regarding
`“a license between the owner of the ’254 Patent and a recognized corporation,
`in consideration of payment of fees, along with an associated claim chart.” PO
`Mot. 2. Accordingly, we grant Patent Owner’s Motions to Seal, including
`
`
`3 Citations are to IPR2020-01031 unless otherwise indicated.
`4 The pages of the Motion are not numbered. We refer to the numbers of the
`pages beginning with the title page as number 1.
`2
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01031 (Patent 10,015,254 B1)
`IPR2020-01032 (Patent 10,015,254 B1)
`
`Patent Owner’s unopposed request for entry of the Proposed Stipulated
`Protective Order (Exhibit 2036), which is similar to the Board’s default
`protective order provided in the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide. See Patent
`Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide (Nov. 2019),
`https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated, (Appendix B).
`Accordingly, the record will be preserved in its entirety, and Exhibits
`2029 and 2030 will not be expunged or made public, pending the outcome of
`any appeal taken from a final written decision. At the conclusion of any
`appeal, or, if no appeal is taken, after the time for filing a notice of appeal has
`expired, the documents may be made public. See id. at 21–22. At that time,
`either party may file a motion to expunge sealed documents from the record
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.56.
`
`Order
`
`It is:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motions to Seal are granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibits 2029 and 2030 will remain
`sealed as outlined per this order.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01031 (Patent 10,015,254 B1)
`IPR2020-01032 (Patent 10,015,254 B1)
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Joseph Micallef
`Scott Border
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`jmicallef@sidley.com
`sborder@sidely.com
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Gregory Gonsalves
`Yeasun Yoon
`CAPITOL IP LAW GROUP, PLLC
`gonsalves@gonsalveslawfim.com
`yoon@capitoliplaw.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket