`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 3
`Entered: May 6, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., D/B/A TECHTRONIC
`INDUSTRIES POWER EQUIPMENT,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CHERVON (HK) LIMITED,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2020-00883 (Patent 9,060,463)
`Case IPR2020-00884 (Patent 9,596,806)
`Case IPR2020-00885 (Patent 9,648,805)
`Case IPR2020-00886 (Patent 9,826,686)
`Case IPR2020-00887 (Patent 9,986,686)
` Case IPR2020-00888 (Patent 10,070,588)
` Case PGR2020-00059 (Patent 10,477,772)
` Case PGR2020-00060 (Patent 10,485,176)
` Case PGR2020-00061 (Patent 10,524,420)1
`
`
`
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Accepting as Sufficient Electronic Service of Petitions on Patent Owner
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e)(1), 42.105(b)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The parties are not authorized to utilize this joint caption.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00883 (Patent 9,060,463)
`Case IPR2020-00884 (Patent 9,596,806)
`Case IPR2020-00885 (Patent 9,648,805)
`Case IPR2020-00886 (Patent 9,826,686)
`Case IPR2020-00887 (Patent 9,986,686)
`Case IPR2020-00888 (Patent 10,070,588)
`Case PGR2020-00059 (Patent 10,477,772)
`Case PGR2020-00060 (Patent 10,485,176)
`Case PGR2020-00061 (Patent 10,524,420)
`
`
`Each of the Petitions in the referenced matters is accompanied by a
`certificate of service indicating Patent Owner was served “by electronic
`copy of this Petition” along with “supporting material.” E.g. IPR2020-
`00883, Paper 1, 33. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e)(1), 42.105(b),
`electronic service is permissible upon agreement of the parties. Petitioner
`clarifies by email to the Board that counsel for Patent Owner in related
`litigation agreed to electronic service of these Petitions prior to filing of the
`Petitions. Ex. 3001. The parties’ agreement was aimed at “avoid[ing]
`printing, shipping, and receiving paper copies” based on “everyone’s work-
`from-home situation due to Covid-19.” Id. In light of Petitioner’s
`clarification and the reasoning underpinning the parties’ agreement, the
`Board deems Petitioner’s certificate of service acceptable, based on the
`current record. If Patent Owner disputes sufficiency of service, Patent
`Owner should notify the Board by email to Trials@uspto.gov within
`thirty (30) days of this Order.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00883 (Patent 9,060,463)
`Case IPR2020-00884 (Patent 9,596,806)
`Case IPR2020-00885 (Patent 9,648,805)
`Case IPR2020-00886 (Patent 9,826,686)
`Case IPR2020-00887 (Patent 9,986,686)
`Case IPR2020-00888 (Patent 10,070,588)
`Case PGR2020-00059 (Patent 10,477,772)
`Case PGR2020-00060 (Patent 10,485,176)
`Case PGR2020-00061 (Patent 10,524,420)
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Edward H. Sikorski
`Ed.Sikorski@dlapiper.com
`James M. Heintz
`James.Heintz@dlapiper.com
`Tiffany Miller
`Tiffany.Miller@dlapiper.com
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`
`For PATENT OWNER (as identified by Petitioner, no appearances yet
`entered):
`
`Keith R. Jarosik
`jarosikk@gtlaw.com
`Benjamin J. Schladweiler
`SchladweilerB@gtlaw.com
`Michael A. Nicodema
`NicodemaM@gtlaw.com
`James J. Lukas, Jr.
`LukasL@gtlaw.com
`Matthew S. Levinstein
`LevinsteinM@gtlaw.com
`Callie J. Sand
`SandC@gtlaw.com
`Benjamin P. Gilford
`GilfordB@gtlaw.com
`
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`
`