throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Trials
`Arner, Erika; Trials
`sean.burdick@unilocusa.com; RussT@SeedIP.com; Ryan Loveless; Jim Etheridge; Brian Koide; Jeff Huang;
`brett@etheridgelaw.com; Goldberg, Joshua; Stach, Jason
`RE: Requesting Electronic IPR Service Under 37 CFR 42.5(b) in view of COVID-19
`Wednesday, March 25, 2020 11:25:40 AM
`
`EXTERNAL Email:
`
`Counsel,
`
`Thank you for contacting the Board. At this time, Petitioner is authorized to file, with the petition, a
`motion to waive 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e)(1), 42.105(b) and accept as sufficient, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4),
`electronic service on Patent Owner. After filing the motion, Petitioner is advised to immediately send an
`email to trials@uspto.gov and inform the Board that the motion is pending.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`(571)272-7822
`
`
`
`From: Arner, Erika <erika.arner@finnegan.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 4:05 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: sean.burdick@unilocusa.com; RussT@SeedIP.com; Ryan Loveless <ryan@etheridgelaw.com>;
`Jim Etheridge <jim@etheridgelaw.com>; Brian Koide <brian@etheridgelaw.com>; Jeff Huang
`<jhuang@etheridgelaw.com>; brett@etheridgelaw.com; Goldberg, Joshua
`<Joshua.Goldberg@finnegan.com>; Stach, Jason <Jason.Stach@finnegan.com>
`Subject: Requesting Electronic IPR Service Under 37 CFR 42.5(b) in view of COVID-19
`
`Your Honors,
`
`In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and government guidance to minimize social interaction and
`travel, Google requests authorization to provide service electronically, rather than physically, of IPR
`petitions it may file in the coming days against patents currently asserted by patent owner Uniloc
`against Google in district court actions, including U.S. patents 9,564,952 and 6,366,908. Following 37
`CFR 42.105(b), Google contacted Uniloc to request an agreement to electronic service in these
`circumstances, but Uniloc has refused. Google’s request and Uniloc’s refusal are attached. Like that
`correspondence, this request is addressed to counsel of record at the USPTO and Uniloc’s litigation
`counsel in these matters. Uniloc’s response demonstrates that electronic correspondence to these
`counsel results in receipt by the patent owner.
`
`For these reasons, Google asks that the Board exercise its discretion under 37 CFR 42.5(b) to
`suspend the physical service requirement in this situation and authorize electronic service of IPR
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1045
`
`

`

`petitions that Google may file on one or both of the listed patents in the coming days.
`
`Regards,
`Erika Arner
`Lead Counsel for Google
`
`Erika H. Arner
`Attorney at Law
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`11955 Freedom Drive, Reston, VA, 20190
`571.203.2754 | fax 202.408.4400 | erika.arner@finnegan.com| Bio
`Finnegan AIA Blog | www.finnegan.com | PTAB Book, 2d ed.
`
`
`
`This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
`proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you believe you have received this message in error, please
`advise the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket