throbber
3/25/2020
`
`19-126 Summary
`
` you will be charged for 5 Pages $0.50
`If you view the Full Docket
`General Docket
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`
`Court of Appeals Docket #: 19-126
`In re: Google LLC
`Appeal From: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
`Fee Status: fee paid
`Case Type Information:
` 1) Mandamus (Civil)
` 2) Petition for Writ of Mandamus
` 3) -
`Originating Court Information:
` District: 0540-2 : 2:18-cv-00462-JRG
` Trial Judge: J. Rodney Gilstrap, Judge
` Date Rec'd COA:
` 09/17/2019
`
` District: 0540-2 : 2:18-cv-00463-JRG
`
`Docketed: 09/18/2019
`Termed: 02/13/2020
`
`https://ecf.cafc.uscourts.gov/n/beam/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=CaseSummary.jsp?caseNum=19-126&dktType=dktPublic&incOrigDkt=Y&incDkt… 1/2
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1041
`
`

`

`3/25/2020
`
`19-126 Summary
`
`11/18/2019 29 ORDER filed. The court requests that not later than November 22, 2019, the parties stipulate to supplement record in
`the district court to include copies of the agreements and provide those agreements to the district court with as few
`confidential redactions as possible. Upon filing of the agreements with the district court, the parties should also
`provide copies to this court. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [649988] [LMS] [Entered:
`11/18/2019 11:21 AM]
`11/21/2019 30 Amended Certificate of Interest for Respondent Super Interconnect Technologies LLC. Service: 11/21/2019 by email.
`[651376] [19-126] [Jeffrey Bragalone] [Entered: 11/21/2019 03:17 PM]
`11/22/2019 31 RESPONSE of Petitioner Google LLC to the court order to set case manager tickler date [29] , court order [29].
`Service: 11/22/2019 by email. [651789] [19-126] [Neal Katyal] [Entered: 11/22/2019 03:29 PM]
`11/22/2019 32 Confidential Response to Court Order of November 18, 2019 filed by Petitioner Google LLC corresponding to Doc.
`No. [31]. Service: 11/22/2019 by email. [651801] [19-126] [Neal Katyal] [Entered: 11/22/2019 03:44 PM]
`11/25/2019 33 RESPONSE of Respondent Super Interconnect Technologies LLC to the court order [29] , court order [29]. Service:
`11/25/2019 by email. [652298] [19-126] [Daniel Olejko] [Entered: 11/25/2019 08:02 PM]
`11/25/2019 34 Confidential Response to Court Order of November 18, 2019 filed by Respondent Super Interconnect Technologies
`LLC corresponding to Doc. No. [33]. Service: 11/25/2019 by email. [652300] [19-126] [Daniel Olejko] [Entered:
`11/25/2019 08:09 PM]
`12/13/2019 35 Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT by
`Thomas Schmidt for Google LLC and Jeffrey Bragalone for Super Interconnect Technologies LLC.
`Panel: Judge: Dyk , Judge: Wallach , Judge: Taranto. [656400] [JCP] [Entered: 12/13/2019 10:29 AM]
`02/13/2020 36 PRECEDENTIAL ORDER granting Petition for Writ of Mandamus [2] filed by Petitioner Google LLC. Concurrence
`filed by Circuit Judge Wallach. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [670998] [JAB] [Entered: 02/13/2020
`10:28 AM]
`03/16/2020 37 Petition for panel rehearing, for en banc rehearing filed by Respondent Super Interconnect Technologies LLC.
`Service: 03/16/2020 by email. The paper copies of the petition must be filed within two business days (see Fed. Cir.
`R. 35(c)(4).The required paper copies should be received by the court on or before 03/18/2020 [679317] [19-126]
`[Daniel Olejko] [Entered: 03/16/2020 11:34 PM]
`03/17/2020 38 18 paper copies of the combined petition for rehearing [37] received from Super Interconnect Technologies LLC.
`[679986] [MJL] [Entered: 03/18/2020 03:08 PM]
`
`https://ecf.cafc.uscourts.gov/n/beam/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=CaseSummary.jsp?caseNum=19-126&dktType=dktPublic&incOrigDkt=Y&incDkt… 2/2
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket