throbber
EXAMPLE 2
`
`PI-75
`
`Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetic Profile
`of Gluteal Versus Deltoid Intramuscular
`Injections of Paliperidone Palmitate 100
`mg Equivalent in Patients with
`Schizophrenia
`
`
`
`EVALUATION OF THE
`PHARMACOKINETIC PROFILE OF
`GLUTEAL VERSUS DELTOID
`INTRAMUSCULAR INJECTIONS OF
`PALIPERIDONE PALMITATE 100 MG
`EQUIVALENT IN PATIENTS WITH
`SCHIZOPHRENIA.
`
`A. Cleton,1 S. Rossenu,1 D. Hough,2 H.
`Crauwels,1 A. Vandebosch,1 J. Berwaerts,2 M.
`Eerdekens,1 I. Francetic3; 1Johnson &
`Johnson Pharmaceutical Research &
`Development, Beerse, Belgium, 2Johnson &
`Johnson Pharmaceutical Research &
`Development, Titusville, NJ, 3 Institute of
`Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Hospital
`Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
`
`
`
`BACKGROUND:
`
`This study was performed to characterize and
`compare the pharmacokinetic profile of
`paliperidone palmitate (formulated as
`described above) following four
`intramuscular injections in the deltoid or
`gluteal muscle.
`
`The aim of this study was to compare the PK
`profile of paliperidone palmitate 100 mg eq.
`administered into the deltoid (n=24) or gluteal
`muscle (n=25).
`
`Method
`
`METHODS:
`
`In this multiple-dose, open-label, parallel-
`group study, patients with schizophrenia were
`randomized to receive 4 consecutive
`injections (Days 1, 8, 36 and 64).
`
`In this multiple-dose, open-label, parallel-
`group study, patients with schizophrenia were
`randomized to receive four consecutive
`intramuscular injections (days 1, 8, 36 and 64)
`of paliperidone palmitate 100 mg-eq.
`administered into either the deltoid (n=24) or
`gluteal muscle (n=25). Plasma samples for
`pharmacokinetic analyses were collected. The
`total paliperidone concentration was
`calculated as the sum of both enantiomers.
`
`Janssen Ex. 2009
`Mylan v. Janssen
`IPR2020-00440
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`

`Results
`
`RESULTS:
`
`The median Cmax for paliperidone was higher
`in the deltoid versus the gluteal muscle after
`the second (31.3 versus 24.1 ng/mL) and
`fourth (23.7 versus 22.3 ng/mL) injections.
`
`The median Cmax was higher in deltoid vs.
`gluteal muscle after the 2nd (31.3 vs. 24.1
`ng/mL) and 4th (23.7 vs. 22.3 ng/mL)
`injections.
`
`After four injections, median AUC∞ was
`similar for both injection sites; Cmax and
`AUCτ for paliperidone were 30% (90% CI =
`100.56 % - 168.93 %) and 20% (90% CI =
`93.09 % - 154.69 %) higher in deltoid versus
`gluteal muscle, respectively.
`
`Median Tmax was similar between injection
`sites after the second (10 day versus 10 day)
`and fourth injections (5 versus 6.5 days).
`
`After four injections, the median peak-to-
`trough ratio was higher (2.3 versus 1.9), with
`a larger intersubject variability for deltoid
`versus gluteal injection.
`
`An increase in median predose plasma
`concentration between days 8, 36 and 64 for
`both sites suggested subjects were not
`completely at steady state after four
`injections. Relative exposure after the fourth
`injection was slightly lower than after the
`second injection in both the deltoid and
`gluteal muscle.
`
`Most commonly reported adverse events
`(combined injection sites) were orthostatic
`hypotension (24%), hypotension (14%),
`diastolic hypotension (12%) and injection site
`pain (14%). There were four serious adverse
`events (worsening of psychosis) that led to
`discontinuations. There were no deaths in the
`study.
`
`After 4 injections, the median fluctuation
`index (FI) was higher (71.9 vs. 56.2%), with a
`larger intersubject variability for deltoid vs.
`gluteal injection.
`
`
`
`Median Tmax was similar between injection
`sites after the 2nd (10 vs. 10 days) and 4th
`injections (5 vs. 6.5 days). The median
`concentration-time profile was higher
`following deltoid injection.
`
`After 4 injections, median AUC∞ was similar
`for both injection sites; Cmax and AUCτ for
`paliperidone were 30% (90%CI=100.56-
`168.93) and 20% (90%CI=93.09-154.69)
`higher in deltoid vs. gluteal muscle,
`respectively.
`
`Increased median predose plasma
`concentrations on Days 8, 36 and 64
`suggested subjects were not completely at
`steady state after 4 injections.
`
`
`
`
`
`Most commonly reported adverse events
`(combined injection sites) were orthostatic
`hypotension (24%), hypotension (14%),
`diastolic hypertension (12%) and injection
`site pain (14%). Four patients discontinued
`due to psychosis.
`
`Janssen Ex. 2009
`Mylan v. Janssen
`IPR2020-00440
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`

`Paliperidone palmitate was well tolerated with
`more favorable local tolerability profile in the
`gluteal versus deltoid; mean injection site
`pain VSA score was 3.3 for gluteal versus
`10.8 for deltoid muscle (day 1, 8 hours after
`injection.
`
`Paliperidone palmitate was well tolerated,
`with a mean injection site pain VAS score of
`3.3 for gluteal vs. 10.8 for deltoid muscle
`(Day 1, 8 hours after injection).
`
`Conclusion
`
`CONCLUSION:
`
`Paliperidone palmitate 100 mg-eq. injections
`resulted in an increased AUCτ higher Cmax,
`greater FI, but similar Tmax following four
`consecutive injections into the deltoid versus
`gluteal muscle.
`
`Paliperidone palmitate 100 mg-eq., had an
`increased AUCτ, higher Cmax and greater FI
`when injected into the deltoid vs. gluteal
`muscle, although similar Tmax was noted, for
`both injection sites.
`
`Paliperidone palmitate 100 mg-eq. was
`systemically and locally well tolerated in this
`study.
`
`Paliperidone palmitate 100 mg-eq. was well
`tolerated.
`
`
`
`Janssen Ex. 2009
`Mylan v. Janssen
`IPR2020-00440
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`EXAMPLE 3
`
`PI-74
`
`Assessment of the Dose Proportionality of
`Paliperidone Palmitate 25, 50, 100, and 150
`mg eq. Following Administration in the
`Deltoid or Gluteal Muscles
`
`
`
`ASSESSMENT OF THE DOSE
`PROPORTIONALITY OF PALIPERIDONE
`PALMITATE 25, 50, 100 AND 150 MG EQ.,
`A NEW LONG-ACTING INJECTABLE
`ANTIPSYCHOTIC FOLLOWING
`ADMINISTRATION IN THE DELTOID OR
`GLUTEAL MUSCLES.
`
`A. Cleton,1 S. Rossenu,1 D. Hough,2 H.
`Crauwels,1 J. Berwaerts,2 S. Gopal,2 A.
`Vandebosch,1 C. Rosso Fernandez3; 1Johnson
`& Johnson Pharmaceutical Research &
`Development, Beerse, Belgium, 2Johnson &
`Johnson Pharmaceutical Research &
`Development, Titusville, NJ, 3 Clinical Trial
`Unit, University Hospital of Bellvitge,
`Barcelona, Spain
`
`
`
`BACKGROUND:
`
`This study evaluated dose proportionality of
`paliperidone palmitate injections when
`administered into either the gluteal or deltoid
`muscle.
`
`Study evaluated dose proportionality of
`paliperidone palmitate injections administered
`in either gluteal or deltoid muscle.
`
`Method
`
`METHODS:
`
`A single-dose, open label, parallel-group
`study of 201 randomized schizophrenia
`subjects was performed. The subjects were
`assigned into eight treatment groups:
`paliperidone palmitate 25 (n=48), 50 (n=50),
`100 (n=51) or 150 (n=52) mg-eq. injected into
`either the deltoid or gluteal muscle.
`
`Serial plasma samples were collected for
`pharmacokinetic evaluation over 126-day
`period. The total paliperidone concentration
`was calculated as the sum of both
`enantiomers.
`
`A single-dose, open-label, parallel-group
`study randomized 201 schizophrenia subjects
`(safety set) into eight treatment groups:
`paliperidone palmitate 25 (n=48), 50 (n=50),
`100 (n=51) or 150 (n=52) mg-eq. injected into
`deltoid or gluteal muscle.
`
`
`
`Janssen Ex. 2009
`Mylan v. Janssen
`IPR2020-00440
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`

`Dose proportionality was assessed by linear
`regression model, for each injection site, with
`log-transformed dose-normalized AUC∞ and
`Cmax as dependent variables and log-
`transformed dose as predictor, respectively of
`Cmax and AUC∞ ratios of the enantiomers were
`documented.
`
`Paliperidone dose proportionality was
`assessed by a linear regression model, for
`each injection site, with log-transformed
`dose-normalized AUC∞ and Cmax as
`dependent variables and log-transformed dose
`as predictor, respectively. Cmax and AUC∞
`ratios of enantiomers [R078543(+)/R078544(-
`)] were documented.
`
`Results
`
`RESULTS:
`
`Slopes for log-transformed dose-normalized
`AUC∞ were not significantly different from
`zero for deltoid (slope -0.06; p=0.036) and
`gluteal injections (slope -0.02; p=0.760
`indicating a dose-proportional increase in
`AUC∞, Tmax, was comparable between doses
`but slightly earlier for deltoid (13-14 days)
`versus gluteal injections (13-17 days).
`
`Median Cmax was higher with deltoid (range
`5.3-11.0 ng/mL) versus gluteal (range 5.1-8.7
`ng/mL) injections except for the 100 mg-eq.
`deltoid (slope −0.22, p=0.0062) and gluteal
`(slope -0.31; p<0.0001) injections, indicating
`a less than dose-proportional increase in Cmax.
`Results of Cmax and AUC were confirmed
`using pairwise comparisons. Plasma
`concentrations of (+)-enantiomer were
`consistently higher than (−)-enantiomer;
`(+)/(−) plasma concentrations ratio was
`approximately 2.4 shortly after administration
`and decreased to ~1.7 for both injection sites,
`independent of dose.
`
`AUC∞ slopes were not significantly different
`from zero for deltoid (slope -0.06; p=0.36)
`and gluteal injections (slope -0.02; p=0.76)
`indicating dose proportional increase in
`AUC∞, Tmax was comparable for doses but
`slightly earlier for deltoid (13-14 d) vs gluteal
`injections (13-17 d).
`
`Median Cmax (range 5.1-11.0ng/mL) was
`higher with deltoid vs gluteal injections
`except for 100 mg eq. dose. Cmax slopes were
`significantly different from zero for deltoid
`(slope -0.22, p=0.0062) and gluteal (slope -
`0.31; p<0.0001) injections, indicating a less
`than proportional increase in Cmax with dose.
`Median (+)/(-) Cmax and AUC∞ ratios were
`~1.7.
`
`After a single dose of paliperidone palmitate,
`subjects received concomitant oral
`antipsychotics. Treatment-emergent AEs
`(TEAs) included tachycardia (10%), headache
`(7%), schizophrenia (6%), insomnia (5%).
`Only 2% of subjects discontinued due to
`TEAs. No deaths were reported.
`
`After a single dose of paliperidone palmitate,
`subjects received concomitant oral
`antipsychotics. Treatment-emergent AEs
`(TEAEs) included tachycardia (10%),
`headache (7%), schizophrenia (6%), insomnia
`(5%), weight gain (5%). Only 2% of subjects
`discontinued due to TEAEs.
`
`Janssen Ex. 2009
`Mylan v. Janssen
`IPR2020-00440
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`

`Conclusion
`
`CONCLUSION:
`
`AUC∞ increased proportionality with
`increasing paliperidone palmitate doses (5-
`150 mg-eq.), regardless of gluteal or deltoid
`injection. Overall, deltoid injection was
`associated with a higher Cmax (except for 100
`mg-eq.) and slightly earlier Tmax compared
`with gluteal injections.
`
`Data indicate AUC∞ increased proportionally
`with increasing paliperidone palmitate doses
`(25-150 mg-eq.), regardless of gluteal or
`deltoid injection. Cmax was less than dose
`proportional for doses >50 mg-eq. Overall,
`deltoid injection was associated with a higher
`Cmax (except for 100 mg-eq.) and slightly
`earlier tmax vs gluteal injection.
`
`
`
`Janssen Ex. 2009
`Mylan v. Janssen
`IPR2020-00440
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket