`ONE RIVERFRONT PLAZA
`1037 Raymond Blvd., Suite 600
`Newark, NJ 07102
`T: 973.757.1100
`F: 973.757.1090
`WALSH.LAW
`
`
`
`Liza M. Walsh
`Direct Dial: (973) 757‐1101
`lwalsh@walsh.law
`
`November 15, 2018
`
`VIA ECF AND FIRST-CLASS MAIL
`Honorable Claire C. Cecchi, U.S.D.J.
`United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
`Martin Luther King Jr. Building & U.S. Courthouse
`50 Walnut Street
`Newark, New Jersey 07102
`
`
`Re:
`
`Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
`Civil Action No: 2:18-00734 (CCC-MF)
`
`
`Dear Judge Cecchi:
`
`
`This firm, together with Kirkland & Ellis LLP, represents Defendant Teva Pharmaceuticals
`USA, Inc. (“Teva”) in the above-referenced matter. We write on behalf of the parties to advise the
`Court that the parties have reached agreement with respect to the claim construction issues
`discussed with the Court at the November 13, 2018 telephone conference. Specifically, Teva has
`withdrawn the argument that the claim term in dispute—“average particle size (d50) of from about
`1600 nm to about 900 nm”—is insolubly ambiguous without prejudice to Teva’s ability to present
`the remainder of its indefiniteness arguments with respect to this claim term at the appropriate
`stage of the case following the close of expert discovery, as discussed with the Court on
`November 13, 2018. The parties agree that there remain no claim construction issues for the
`Court to address at this time.
`
`In view of the foregoing, the parties believe that the November 15, 2018 2:00 PM
`telephone conference with the Court is unnecessary. The parties appreciate the Court’s
`consideration of this submission and remain available should Your Honor have any questions or
`would like to hear further from the parties.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`s/Liza M. Walsh
`
`Liza M. Walsh
`
`All Counsel of Record (via ECF & email)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cc:
`
`
`
`Mylan v. Janssen (IPR2020-00440) Ex. 1029 p. 001
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
