throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 21
`Date: November 2, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`NETFLIX, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2020-00041
`Patent 8,407,609 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before CHARLES J. BOUDREAU, DANIEL J. GALLIGAN, and
`JULIET MITCHELL DIRBA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`DIRBA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00041
`Patent 8,407,609 B2
`
`
`Both parties requested oral argument pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70.
`Papers 19, 20. Petitioner and Patent Owner both propose thirty minutes per
`side and intend to participate remotely via video conference, given the
`ongoing pandemic. Papers 19, 20.
`The oral argument requests are granted according to the terms set
`forth in this Order.
`Oral argument will commence at 2:00 p.m. Central Time on
`Thursday, December 3, 2020, by video. The parties are directed to contact
`the Board at least ten business days in advance of the hearing if there are
`any concerns about disclosing confidential information. The Board will
`provide a court reporter for the hearing, and the reporter’s transcript will
`constitute the official record of the hearing.
`If at any time during the proceeding, counsel encounters technical or
`other difficulties that fundamentally undermine counsel’s ability to
`adequately represent its client, please let the panel know immediately, and
`adjustments will be made.1
`To facilitate planning, each party must contact PTAB Hearings at
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov at least five business days prior to the oral
`hearing date to receive video set-up information. As a reminder, all
`arrangements and the expenses involved with appearing by video, such as
`the selection of the facility from which a party will attend by video, must be
`borne by that party. If a video connection cannot be established, the parties
`will be provided with dial-in connection information, and the oral hearing
`will be conducted telephonically.
`
`
`1 For example, if a party is experiencing poor video quality, the Board may
`provide alternate dial-in information.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00041
`Patent 8,407,609 B2
`
`
`If one or both parties would prefer to participate in the oral hearing
`telephonically, they shall notify PTAB Hearings at the above email address
`at least five business days prior to the hearing to receive dial-in connection
`information.
`Each side will have a total of thirty minutes to present its argument.
`New arguments not previously raised in the parties’ substantive papers in
`this proceeding may not be raised during the oral argument. First, Petitioner
`will present its arguments regarding all issues for which it bears the ultimate
`burden of proof. Next, Patent Owner may respond to Petitioner’s arguments
`and present any issues for which it bears the ultimate burden (e.g., any
`pending motions). Finally, Petitioner may reply to the arguments presented
`by Patent Owner, and then Patent Owner may reply to Petitioner’s reply.
`Each party may reserve no more than fifteen minutes for its rebuttal, and any
`arguments made during its rebuttal period must be responsive to arguments
`the opposing party made in its immediately preceding presentation.
`
`Pre-Hearing Conference
`
`A pre-hearing conference call will be held upon request. See
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide 82 (Nov. 2019), available at
`https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/tpgnov.pdf. Any
`request for a pre-hearing conference must be made by Wednesday,
`November 18, 2020 (Paper 11 (Scheduling Order), 10) and must be
`submitted to Trials@uspto.gov, with an identification of several dates and
`times of availability for both parties. The prehearing conference is not
`required; absent a request, no call will be held.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00041
`Patent 8,407,609 B2
`
`
`Prior to making a request, the parties should meet and confer and send
`one joint request to the Board with an agreed upon set of limited issues for
`discussion in the pre-hearing conference. If the parties are unable to agree
`on the issues to be addressed at the pre-hearing conference, the joint request
`shall specify which issues are disputed and provide a brief statement (not to
`exceed one sentence) of the opposing party’s objection. Issues appropriate
`for discussion in a pre-hearing conference may include objections to
`demonstratives, pending motions (particularly motions to exclude),
`procedures for handling confidential information during the hearing, and any
`other issue that may affect the ability of a party to present its arguments at
`the hearing. Any issues discussed at the pre-hearing conference do not limit
`the scope of the oral hearing.
`
`Demonstratives
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), the party’s demonstratives must be
`served on opposing counsel at least seven business days before the hearing.
`In addition, demonstratives shall be filed with the Board in accordance with
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b) at least three business days before the hearing.
`Demonstratives are visual aids to oral argument, not evidence, and are
`intended only to assist the parties in presenting their oral argument to the
`panel. See Consolidated Trial Practice Guide 84. Demonstratives may not
`advance arguments or introduce evidence not previously presented in the
`record, and each demonstrative must include a citation to the briefs and/or
`evidence in the record indicating the source(s) of its content.
`The parties shall meet and confer to discuss any objections to the
`demonstratives. If any issues regarding demonstratives remain unresolved
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00041
`Patent 8,407,609 B2
`
`after the parties meet and confer by telephone, the parties shall jointly
`submit (by email to Trials@uspto.gov) a one-page list of objections to the
`demonstratives at least three business days before the hearing. Any
`objection not timely presented will be considered waived. For each
`objection, the one-page list must identify with particularity the
`demonstratives subject to the objection and include a short, one-sentence
`statement explaining the objection. The panel will consider the objections
`and may schedule a conference call if deemed necessary. Rulings on the
`objections may be reserved until the hearing or after the hearing.
`
`Live Testimony
`
`No live testimony from any witness will be permitted at the hearing
`without prior authorization from the Board. A party requesting authorization
`to present live testimony at the hearing shall initiate a joint telephone
`conference with the other party and the panel as soon as possible, and in any
`event no later than seven business days prior to the hearing to discuss the
`matter. The parties are directed to the Board’s decision in K-40 Electronics,
`LLC v. Escort, Inc., IPR2013-00203, Paper 34 (PTAB May 21, 2014)
`(precedential) for guidance as to the limited circumstances in which live
`testimony may be authorized.
`
`Remote Hearing Instructions
`
`The Board generally expects lead counsel for each party to be present
`by video at the oral hearing. Any counsel of record may present the party’s
`argument as long as that counsel is present by video.
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00041
`Patent 8,407,609 B2
`
`
`Any special requests for audio-visual equipment should be directed to
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov. A party may also indicate any special requests
`related to appearing at a video oral hearing, such as a request to
`accommodate visual or hearing impairments, and indicate how the PTAB
`may accommodate the special request. Any special requests must be
`presented in a separate communication not less than five business days
`before the hearing.
`Please unmute yourself only when speaking. The panel will have
`access to all papers filed with the Board and the demonstratives. During the
`oral hearing, the parties are advised to identify clearly and specifically each
`demonstrative referenced (e.g., by slide or screen number) to ensure the
`clarity and accuracy of the court reporter’s transcript. Furthermore, the
`remote nature of the oral hearing may also result in an audio lag, and so the
`parties are advised to observe a pause prior to speaking, so as to avoid
`speaking over others.
`Members of the public may request to listen in on this oral hearing. If
`resources are available, the Board generally expects to grant such requests.
`If either party objects to the Board granting such requests, for example,
`because confidential information may be discussed, the party must notify the
`Board by contacting PTABHearings@uspto.gov at least ten business days
`prior to the oral hearing date.
`
`6
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00041
`Patent 8,407,609 B2
`
`
`ORDER
`
`It is:
`ORDERED that oral argument will commence at 2:00 p.m. Central
`Time on Thursday, December 3, 2020, by video; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the measures set forth above shall govern
`the oral hearing in the above-captioned proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00041
`Patent 8,407,609 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`Babak Tehranchi
`Patrick J. McKeever
`Kyle R. Canavera
`Matthew Bernstein
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`tehranchi-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`mckeever-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`canavera-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`bernstein-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Ryan Loveless
`Brett Mangrum
`James Etheridge
`Jeffrey Huang
`ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP
`ryan@etheridgelaw.com
`brett@etheridgelaw.com
`jim@etheridgelaw.com
`jeff@etheridgelaw.com
`
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket