throbber

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00040
`Patent 7,326,708 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 39
`Entered: August 14, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`Before SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN, ROBERT A. POLLOCK, and
`TIMOTHY G. MAJORS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MAJORS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2020-00040
`Patent 7,326,708 B2
`
`
`The Board, in recognition of various stipulations of the parties (see
`Papers 37 and 38), and in furtherance of the modification of certain due
`dates discussed during the August 10, 2020, conference call, the schedule of
`this proceeding is amended as shown in the attached Due Date Appendix.
`Except as expressly modified herein, all other provisions of the
`Scheduling Order (Papers 22 and 32) remain in force.
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00040
`Patent 7,326,708 B2
`
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 1 ........................................................................ August 21, 2020
`Patent Owner’s response to the petition
`Patent Owner’s motion to amend the patent
`DUE DATE 2 .................................................................. November 13, 2020
`Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`DUE DATE 3 ................................................................... December 18, 2020
`Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply
`Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend
`(or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)
`DUE DATE 4 ................................................................... December 30, 2020
`Request for oral argument (may not be extended by stipulation)
`DUE DATE 5 ....................................................................... January 20, 2021
`Petitioner’s sur-reply to reply to opposition to motion to amend
`Motion to exclude evidence
`DUE DATE 6 ....................................................................... January 27, 2021
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`Request for prehearing conference
`DUE DATE 7 ....................................................................... February 3, 2021
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`DUE DATE 8 ..................................................................... February 11, 2021
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2020-00040
`Patent 7,326,708 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Jitendra Malik
`Alissa M. Pacchioli
`Christopher W. West
`Heike S. Radeke
`KATTEN MUCHIN ROSEMAN LLP
`jitty.malik@kattenlaw.com
`alissa.pacchioli@kattenlaw.com
`christopher.west@katten.com
`heike.radeke@katten.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Stanley E. Fisher
`Jessamyn S. Berniker
`Shaun P. Mahaffy
`Anthony H. Sheh
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`sfisher@wc.com
`jberniker@wc.com
`smahaffy@wc.com
`asheh@wc.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket