`Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:58 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: 'Jonathan.Strang@lw.com' <Jonathan.Strang@lw.com>; 'Clement.Naples@lw.com' <Clement.Naples@lw.com>;
`Haug, Ed <EHaug@haugpartners.com>; Murphy, Brian P. <BMurphy@haugpartners.com>
`Subject: IPR2019‐01539 (Judges Grossman, Cherry, and Dougal)
`
`Dear Honorable Board:
`
`We write on behalf of Bentley Motors, Limited and Bentley Motors Inc. (“Petitioner”). On March 27, Bentley
`filed a Request for Rehearing in response to the panel’s March 10 discretionary denial of institution in
`IPR2019-01539. Petitioner also requested Precedential Opinion Panel (“POP”) review. On June 16, POP
`review was denied and it was further ordered that this panel maintain authority including over the submitted
`rehearing request.
`
`We write to call to the Board’s attention the attached June 16, 2020 decision in IPR2019-01393, wherein the
`panel reversed its discretionary denial decision after POP review was denied and the parties were provided an
`opportunity to address the Apple v. Fintiv factors, which were recently designated as precedential on May 5,
`2020. Sand Revolution v. Continental, IPR2019-01393, Paper 24 (PTAB, June 16, 2020). We also note that
`similar to the facts in the attached decision, the status of the related JLR v. Bentley district court litigation has
`changed since the Board’s original decision. For instance, the October 13, 2020 trial date has now been
`rescheduled for February 23, 2021.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Robert E. Colletti
`Partner
`
`Haug Partners LLP
`745 Fifth Avenue
`New York, NY 10151
`+1 212.588.0800 Main
`+1 212.863.2117 Direct
`
`rcolletti@haugpartners.com
`www.haugpartners.com
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
