throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________________
`
`World Programming Limited
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SAS Institute Inc.
`Patent Owner
`______________________
`
`Case IPR2019-01458
`Patent 7,170,519
`______________________
`
`MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`

`

`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54, Patent Owner, SAS Institute Inc.
`
`(“SAS”), respectfully submits this motion to seal Exhibits 2007-2009. SAS has
`
`conferred with Petitioner World Programming Limited (“WPL”) regarding this
`
`motion, and provided WPL with a draft thereof. However, given logistical and
`
`timing issues, SAS has not obtained WPL’s formal agreement to this motion. In any
`
`event, SAS believes that WPL will not oppose the substance of this motion.
`
`Although “the default rule is that all papers filed in an inter partes review are
`
`open and available for access by the public,” a party may file a motion with the
`
`Board to seal confidential information that is protected from disclosure. Garmin
`
`Int’l, Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC, IPR2012-00001, Paper No. 34 at 2 (PTAB
`
`March 14, 2013). “The standard for granting a motion to seal is ‘for good cause.’”
`
`Id. at 3 (quoting 37 C.F.R. § 42.54).
`
`Good cause exists to place Exhibits 2007-2009 under seal because they are
`
`documents designated under a Court-issued protective order in SAS Institute Inc. v.
`
`World Programming Limited et al., Case No. 5:10-cv-25-FL (E.D.N.C.). By so
`
`designating them under the District Court’s protective order, WPL has indicated that
`
`these documents contain confidential information related to, for example,
`
`intercompany relationships and transactions, and for purposes of this motion, SAS
`
`does not dispute that such is the case. Accordingly, in the context of this IPR
`
`proceeding, Exhibits 2007-2009, in their entirety, constitute confidential information
`
`
`
`-1-
`
`

`

`that should be protected from public disclosure by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`(“FRCP”) 26(c)(1)(G) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.54. Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`
`48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012) (referring to FRCP 26(c)(1)(G) for protection of
`
`confidential information). By so designating these documents under the District
`
`Court’s protective order, WPL has further indicated that none of Exhibits 2007-2009,
`
`nor the information therein, has been made publicly available. Moreover, SAS is
`
`informed and believes that both parties have undertaken efforts to maintain the
`
`confidentiality of Exhibits 2007-2009 in accordance with the above-referenced
`
`District Court protective order.
`
`
`
`On October 28 through November 6, the parties met and conferred in good
`
`faith regarding the PTAB’s Default Protective Order, and SAS agrees to be bound
`
`by the terms of that Order. SAS received comments on the proposed default
`
`protective order from WPL earlier today, too late to be negotiated and incorporated
`
`into this motion. A copy of the proposed protective order is attached herewith as
`
`Exhibit 2013, which is the same as the PTAB’s Default Protective Order set forth in
`
`Appendix B of the Trial Practice Guide Update (July 2019).
`
`
`
`SAS therefore respectfully requests that aforementioned Exhibits 2007-2009
`
`remain under seal, and that the agreed Default Protective Order be entered in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`

`

`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 12, 2019 By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Brenton R. Babcock/
`Brenton R. Babcock (Reg. No. 39,592)
`WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP
`400 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 1700
`Irvine, CA 92618
`T: (714) 557-3800
`E: brent.babcock@wbd-us.com
`
`Joshua P. Davis (Reg. No. 72,524)
`WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP
`811 Main Street, Suite 3130
`Houston, TX 77002
`T: (346) 998-7810
`E: joshua.p.davis@wbd-us.com
`
`Tony T. Chen (Reg. No. 67,414)
`WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP
`1841 Page Mill Road, Suite 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`T: (408) 341-3061
`E: tony.chen@wbd-us.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Motion to Seal
`
`was served on November 12, 2019, via electronic mail, at the following:
`
`Harper Batts (Reg. No. 56,160)
`HBatts@sheppardmullin.com
`Chris Ponder (Reg. No. 77,167)
`CPonder@sheppardmullin.com
`Jason Mueller (Reg. No. 64,647)
`Jeffrey Liang (Reg. No. 69,043)
`LegalTm-WPL-SAS-IPRs@sheppardmullin.com
`Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
`379 Lytton Ave.
`Palo Alto, CA 94301
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 12, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Brenton R. Babcock/
`Brenton R. Babcock (Reg. No. 39,592)
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`-i-
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket