throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 9
` Entered: August 2, 2019
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ADAMIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BELCHER PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2019-01021
`Patent 9,283,197 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, TINA E. HULSE, and
`CYNTHIA M. HARDMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HARDMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Joint Motion to Terminate and
`Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as
`Business Confidential Information
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5(a), 42.71(a)
`
`

`

`IPR2019-01021
`Patent 9,283,197 B1
`
`
`
`On July 29, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate the
`proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). Paper 7. The
`parties also filed a copy of a Settlement and License Agreement (Exhibit
`1026), along with a joint request to treat the agreement as business
`confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`Paper 8.
`Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the
`filing of a settlement agreement, unless the Board has already decided the
`merits of the proceeding. See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). This case is in the preliminary
`proceeding stage, and we have not yet decided whether to institute trial. In
`view of the early stage of this proceeding and the settlement between the
`Parties, we determine that it is appropriate to dismiss the case without
`rendering a decision as to whether a trial will be instituted. See
`37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a). Therefore, we grant the Joint Motion to Terminate.
`We also determine that the parties have complied with the requirements
`of 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) to have the Settlement and License Agreement
`(Exhibit 1026) treated as business confidential information and kept separate
`from the files of the patent at issue in this proceeding. Thus, we grant the
`Joint Request to treat the Settlement and License Agreement as business
`confidential information.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2019-01021
`Patent 9,283,197 B1
`
`
`ORDER
`For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Request to treat the Settlement
`and License Agreement (Exhibit 1026) as business confidential information
`is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Settlement and License Agreement
`shall be kept separate from the file of Patent 9,283,197 B1, and made available
`only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or to any person on
`a showing of good cause, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for inter partes review is
`DISMISSED.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2019-01021
`Patent 9,283,197 B1
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Jason A. Engel
`Kacy L. Dicke
`K&L GATES LLP
`jason.engel.ptab@klgates.com
`kacy.dicke.@klgates.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Cole Y. Carlson
`Stefan V. Stein
`GRAYROBINSON, P.A.
`cole.carlson@gray-robinson.com
`stefan.stein@gray-robinson.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket