throbber
Health Canada OKs Imbruvica for Treating Chronic Graft-
`Versus-Host Disease
`lymphomanewstoday.com/2017/10/31/janssen-inc-announces-imbruvica-ibrutinib-as-the-first-approved-
`treatment-for-chronic-graft-versus-host-disease-cgvhd-granted-by-health-canada-priority-review/
`Janet Stewart, MSc
`
`October 31,
`2017
`
`Janssen‘s Imbruvica (ibrutinib) has been approved by Health Canada for treating chronic
`graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), a life-threatening condition that some patients develop
`after a stem cell transplant.
`
`Following a priority review, Health Canada approved the drug as an oral, once-daily therapy
`for patients with steroid dependent or resistant cGVHD. The U.S. Food and Drug
`Administration approved Imbruvica for the same purpose in August.
`
`Imbruvica is a first-in-class Burton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Health Canada’s decision
`was based on results from the ongoing PCYC-1129 Phase 1b/2 trial (NCT02195869) showing
`that the drug is safe and efficacious in treating the condition.
`
`“Symptoms related to cGVHD can have a significant impact on a patient’s quality of life, and
`for most they come after an already long and difficult battle with a life-threatening disease
`such as leukemia or lymphoma,” Andrew Daly, MD, director of the Alberta Blood and
`Marrow Transplant Program said in a press release. Daly also is clinical associate professor
`at the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary. “Physicians have had a real
`challenge finding options with compelling clinical data to treat cGVHD safely and effectively.
`This approval provides a much-needed new approach for patients who fail initial therapy, as
`data shows treatment with Imbruvica resulted in improved patient outcomes,” Daily said.
`
`1/2
`
`

`

`cGVHD is a life-threatening condition. It is a complication of stem cell transplants that
`happens when a donor’s immune cells attack the patient’s body, and occurs in 30 to 70
`percent of patients who receive stem cells from a partially matched donor (a sibling, for
`example). But current therapies involve corticosteroids, which damped the immune system
`and make patients more susceptible to infections or cancer progression.
`
`The Phase 1b/2 trial (NCT02195869) of Imbruvica included 42 patients with steroid
`dependent or refractory cGVHD, whose first line corticosteroid therapy had failed. Their
`ages ranged from 19 to 74 years.
`
`The most common malignancies that led to transplantation were acute lymphocytic
`leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
`
`Of the 42 patients, 21 percent achieved complete responses while 45 percent showed
`partial responses. Doses of steroids were reduced over the course of the study, with five
`patients completely discontinuing corticosteroids.
`
`“Lymphoma and leukemia patients are among those who may be able to get a stem cell
`transplant and achieve a potential cure. The procedure also comes with a high risk of
`cGVHD, which can have a severe impact on a patient’s ability to work and go about their
`day-to-day life,” said Robin Markowitz, CEO, Lymphoma Canada. “To date, many patients
`have had to rely on immunosuppressants and high-dose steroids to treat their cGVHD
`symptoms, and these come with significant issues. It is great news that patients finally have
`an approved treatment option.”
`
`Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, and Janssen Biotech are all involved in the development and
`commercialization of Imbruvica.
`
`2/2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket