throbber
Bone Marrow Transplantation (2001) 28, 47–49
`© 2001 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0268–3369/01 $15.00
`www.nature.com/bmt
`
`m
`
`Graft-versus-host disease
`
`Treatment of severe steroid refractory acute graft-versus-host disease
`with infliximab, a chimeric human/mouse antiTNF␣ antibody
`
`G Kobbe, P Schneider, U Rohr, R Fenk, F Neumann, M Aivado, L Dietze, R Kronenwett,
`A Hu¨nerlitu¨rkoglu and R Haas
`
`Department of Haematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich Heine University Du¨sseldorf, Germany
`
`Summary:
`
`Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a serious
`complication of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell
`transplantation (PBSCT). Patients with severe aGVHD
`not responding to treatment with steroids have a poor
`prognosis. We treated four patients with severe aGVHD
`refractory to steroids with infliximab, a chimeric
`human/mouse antiTNF␣ antibody. Patients (CML 2,
`MM 1, AML 1) developed grade III–IV GVHD at a
`median of 34 days (range 15–76) after myeloablative
`PBSCT (two), donor lymphocyte infusion for relapsed
`CML (one) or non-myeloablative PBSCT (one), respect-
`ively. All patients had severe intestinal involvement in
`addition to skin and/or liver disease and had received
`treatment with high-dose steroids (four) for a median
`of 11 days (range 5–17) in addition to CsA (four) and
`MMF (three). Infliximab (10 mg/kg) was given once a
`week until clinical
`improvement. In three of
`four
`patients a complete resolution of diarrhea and signifi-
`cant
`improvement of skin and liver disease were
`observed. Two patients received one, one patient two
`and one patient three infliximab infusions. At present
`two patients are alive ⬎200 days after therapy, one with
`limited cGVHD. Two patients died, one of progressive
`malignant disease without GVHD and one of refractory
`GVHD. Infliximab is apparently an active drug for the
`treatment of aGVHD. Bone Marrow Transplantation
`(2001) 28, 47–49.
`graft-versus-host disease; TNF-␣; infliximab
`Keywords:
`
`Acute GVHD causes significant morbidity and mortality
`after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation despite
`the use of effective prophylactic regimens. Following acti-
`vation by recipient antigen-presenting cells, alloreactive
`donor-derived T cells expand and induce an inflammatory
`process that results in the clinical picture of aGVHD.1 Ster-
`oids are the treatment of choice in aGVHD ⬎II° and induce
`
`remissions in the majority of patients. Individuals who fail
`steroid therapy have been treated with a variety of agents
`including MMF, ATG, OKT3 and antibodies to the
`interleukin-2 receptor alone or in combination.2,3 Response
`rates have varied between 15 and 60%, but, in part due
`to infectious complications and relapse of the underlying
`disease, survival has been low. Early studies have sug-
`gested a beneficial effect of treatment strategies that block
`the activity of TNF␣, which is the key cytokine in the
`inflammatory cascade of aGVHD.4 We treated four patients
`with severe steroid refractory GVHD with the chimeric
`anti-TNF␣ antibody infliximab (Remicade; Centocor,
`Leiden, The Netherlands), which is approved for the clini-
`cal use in rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease.
`
`Case 1
`
`A 40-year-old male patient with CML in first chronic phase
`was given an allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)
`transplant (4.07 × 106 CD34+ cells per kg) from his HLA-
`identical sister after conditioning with busulfan (16 mg/kg)
`and cytoxan (120 mg/kg). He received CsA and MMF for
`GVHD prophylaxis. The post-transplant clinical course was
`uneventful until at day 15, when the patient developed
`acute GVHD III–IV with cutaneous, hepatic and severe
`intestinal involvement. Steroid treatment was initiated, but
`the diarrhea continued. After 5 days with steroids
`⬎10 mg/kg/day without improvement he received a single
`dose of infliximab (10 mg/kg). Stool frequency started to
`decline after 4 days. Within 2 weeks the diarrhea disap-
`peared completely. The patient later developed recurrent
`CMV antigenemia and pulmonary mycosis which was suc-
`cessfully treated with ganciclovir and liposomal ampho-
`tericin B. He experienced a second episode of GVHD 3
`months later while on low dose CsA, which then resolved
`after treatment with steroids. He is alive at day 292, in
`molecular CR of his CML with limited chronic GVHD.
`
`Case 2
`
`Correspondence: Dr G Kobbe, Department of Haematology, Oncology and
`Clinical Immunology, Heinrich Heine University Du¨sseldorf, Moorenstr.
`5, 40225 Du¨sseldorf, Germany
`Received 23 February 2001; accepted 19 April 2001
`
`A 48-year-old man with CML in first chronic phase
`received a T cell-depleted PBSC graft (3.32 × 106 CD34+
`cells per kg)
`from a matched unrelated donor. The
`
`

`

`m
`
`48
`
`Infliximab for steroid refractory GVHD
`G Kobbe etal
`
`conditioning regimen consisted of melphalan (140 mg/m2),
`thiotepa (10 mg/kg),
`cytoxan (120 mg/kg) and ATG
`(40 mg/kg). GVHD prophylaxis was CsA. On day 103 he
`experienced a cytogenetic relapse. Following repeated
`donor lymphocyte infusions with increasing cell numbers
`and three doses of interferon alpha the patient experienced
`acute cutaneous GVHD with involvement of the complete
`body surface which transiently improved with treatment
`with CsA, and steroids (5 mg/kg/day). During steroid taper
`at a dose of 3.5 mg/kg/day the skin worsened again and
`grade IV gastrointestinal GVHD occurred. The patient
`received two doses of infliximab (10 mg/kg, once a week).
`Skin and gastrointestinal
`involvement
`improved 5 days
`after the first dose and the diarrhea disappeared 2 weeks
`after the second dose. The patient developed multifocal pul-
`monary mycosis, CMV antigenemia, generalized seizures
`and severe wasting but was successfully treated with lipo-
`somal amphotericin B and ganciclovir. He is now alive, off
`steroids and amphotericin B, in molecular CR with limited
`chronic GVHD 275 days after treatment.
`
`Case 3
`
`A 41-year-old female with multiple myeloma IgA lambda
`received an autologous PBSC transplant after conditioning
`with melphalan (200 mg/m2). For consolidation she was
`treated with an allogeneic PBSC transplant from her HLA-
`identical
`sister
`after
`conditioning with
`fludarabin
`(90 mg/m2) and 2 Gy TBI followed by CsA and MMF. The
`patient engrafted but suffered from an early relapse of the
`myeloma with multiple extramedular tumors. Following
`withdrawal of immunosuppression she developed complete
`
`donor chimerism and acute GVHD with liver (grade 3) and
`gastrointestinal (grade 4) involvement which was refractory
`to treatment with high-dose steroids (⬎10 mg/kg/day), CsA
`and MMF. After 11 days on steroids she received one dose
`of infiximab (10 mg/kg). The diarrhea improved after 5
`days and completely disappeared within 3 weeks. Bilirubin
`and liver enzymes declined 26 days after treatment. Unfor-
`tunately the myeloma progressed rapidly and the patient
`died 99 days after transplantation without signs of GVHD.
`
`Case 4
`
`A 49-year-old female was treated with an allogeneic
`transplant (7.7 × 106 CD34+
`peripheral blood stem cell
`cells/kg) from her HLA-identical brother for secondary
`AML in first remission. She received conditioning with
`busulfan (16 mg/kg) and cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg)
`followed by CsA and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. On day
`76 the patient developed aGVHD with cutaneous (grade 2),
`hepatic (grade 1) and intestinal (grade 4) involvement.
`After 11 days on high-dose steroids without substantial
`improvement she received the first dose of infliximab. A
`total of three doses (5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) were
`given without improvement. The patient then received sal-
`vage treatment with ATG (75 mg/kg) and later pentostatin
`but died of progressive GVHD 125 days after transplan-
`tation.
`
`Discussion
`
`chimeric
`a
`is
`(Remicade; Centocor)
`Infliximab
`mouse/human IgG1kappa antibody that binds with high affin-
`
`Table 1
`
`Summary for four patients with severe steroid refractory acute GVHD treated with infliximab
`
`Age/Sex
`Diagnosis
`Acute GVHD (grade)
`Organ involvement (grade)
`
`Diarrhea at the start of steroids (ml)
`Bilirubin at the start of steroids (mg/dl)
`Steroid treatment before infliximab (days)
`Additional treatment
`Number of infliximab doses
`Side-effects during infliximab infusion
`Diarrhea at the start of infliximab (ml)
`Interval to intestinal improvement (days)
`Interval to stool normalization (days)
`Bilirubin at the start of infliximab (mg/dl)
`Maximal bilirubin (mg/dl)
`Interval to bilirubin normalization (days)
`Response
`Additional salvage treatment
`Response to salvage treatment
`Chronic GVHD
`Outcome (day)
`
`Case 1
`
`Case 2
`
`Case 3
`
`Case 4
`
`40/M
`CML
`IV
`skin (2)
`liver (3)
`intestinal (4)
`⬎2000
`2.9
`5
`CsA/MMF
`1
`—
`⬎2000
`4
`8
`1.4
`6.8
`29
`CR
`—
`—
`limited
`alive (+292)
`
`48/M
`CML
`IV
`skin (3)
`—
`intestinal (4)
`a
`0.7
`17
`CsA
`2
`—
`⬎2000
`5
`17
`0.4
`—
`—
`CR
`—
`—
`limited
`alive (+275)
`
`41/F
`MM
`IV
`—
`liver (3)
`intestinal (4)
`⬎1500
`1.5
`11
`CsA/MMF
`1
`—
`⬎2000
`5
`20
`4.5
`11.6
`39
`CR
`—
`—
`—
`deadb
`
`49/F
`AML
`IV
`skin (2)
`liver (4)
`intestinal (4)
`⬎1000 bloody
`1.6
`11
`CsA/MMF
`3
`—
`⬎1000 bloody
`—
`—
`0.7
`34.6
`—
`PD
`ATG, Pentostatin
`PD
`—
`deadc
`
`aPatient developed grade 4 intestinal GVHD while on steroids for cutaneous GVHD.
`bPatient died of progressive myeloma without signs of GVHD.
`cPatient died of GVHD.
`
`Bone Marrow Transplantation
`
`

`

`m
`
`49
`
`ity to soluble and transmembrane forms of human TNF␣.
`Binding to soluble TNF␣ results in the neutralization of its
`activity, whereas binding to the transmembrane form of
`TNF␣ causes lysis of the affected cell by activation of
`complement and induction of antibody-mediated cellular
`toxicity.5 Both mechanisms may have contributed to the
`clinical response observed in the three patients described
`above. Very likely depletion of TNF␣ producing cells is
`the main reason for the long-lasting clinical effects of
`infliximab in Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis. In
`both diseases a single dose of infliximab can induce clinical
`remissions in patients with disease refractory to standard
`treatment.6,7 A significant number of patients experience a
`relapse of their autoimmune disease about 2 months after
`the first infusion. Patient 1 in our series also suffered from
`recurrent GVHD 3 months after the first episode which then
`improved with steroids. Couriel et al8 observed a response
`rate of 70% in patients receiving infliximab for the treat-
`ment of steroid-refractory aGVHD. Patients with involve-
`ment of the gastrointestinal tract had the greatest benefit
`(85% response). As a limitation of the study of Couriel
`et al, patients were treated with ATG and/or daclizumab,
`in addition to infliximab. Therefore clinical improvement
`may be attributed to one of these substances or a combi-
`nation of all. The responses observed in the patients treated
`in our institution demonstrate that infliximab alone has a
`significant activity in severe steroid-resistant aGVHD.
`Two of the four patients in our group developed serious
`infectious complications including CMV antigenemia and
`aspergillosis. How far suppression of TNF␣ activity con-
`tributed to the development of these infections is not clear.
`Reactivation of CMV is closely linked to the development
`of aGVHD, and aspergillosis also occurs frequently in
`patients
`receiving
`intensive
`immunosuppression
`for
`aGVHD. However, randomized placebo-controlled studies
`in rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease have suggested
`an increased incidence of infections in patients treated with
`infliximab. Other side-effects included the development of
`
`Infliximab for steroid refractory GVHD
`G Kobbe etal
`
`autoantibodies and possibly an increased incidence of lym-
`phoma. Animal studies with neutralization of TNF␣ after
`allogeneic stem cell
`transplantation have shown an
`increased risk of leukemic relapse. In contrast both patients
`with CML in our series entered molecular remission despite
`immunosuppressive therapy and treatment with infliximab
`suggesting a persistence of the graft-versus-leukemia effect
`at least in patients with CML. We conclude that infliximab
`is a promising new agent for the treatment of aGVHD
`especially in cases with gastrointestinal involvement.
`
`References
`
`1 Shlomchik WD, Couzens MS, Bi Tang C et al. Prevention
`of graft-versus-host disease by inactivation of host antigen-
`presenting cells. Science 1999; 285: 412–415.
`2 Martin PJ, Schoch G, Fisher L et al. A retrospective analysis
`of therapy for acute graft-versus-host-disease: secondary treat-
`ment. Blood 1991; 62: 626–631.
`3 Przepiorka D, Kernan NA, Ippoliti C et al. Daclizumab, a
`humanized anti-interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain antibody,
`for treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2000;
`95: 83–89.
`4 Piguet PF, Grau GE, Allet B et al. Tumor necrosis
`factor/cachectin is an effector of skin and gut lesions of the
`acute phase of graft-vs-host disease. J Exp Med 1987; 166:
`1280–1289.
`5 Scallon BJ, Moore MA, Trinh H et al. Chimeric anti-TNF-␣
`monoclonal antibody cA2 binds recombinant transmembrane
`TNF-␣ and activates immune effector functions. Cytokine
`1995; 7: 251–259.
`6 Present DH, Rutgeerts P, Targan S et al. Infliximab for the
`treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. New
`Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1398–1405.
`7 Choi HK, Seeger JD, Kuntz KM. A cost-effectiveness analysis
`of treatment options for patients with methotrexate resistant
`rheumatoid arthritis. Arthr Rheum 2000; 43: 2316–2327.
`8 Couriel D, Hicks K, Ipolitti C et al. Infliximab for the treat-
`ment of graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic transplant
`recipients. An Rheu Dis 2000; 95 (Suppl. 1): Abstr. 537.
`
`Bone Marrow Transplantation
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket