`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`
`
`SANDOZ INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PHARMACYCLICS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`__________________
`
`Case IPR2019-00865
`U.S. Patent No. 9,795,604
`__________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), respectfully requests oral
`
`argument on the instituted grounds, any issues raised in any motion(s), and any other
`
`arguments raised in IPR2019-00865, including:
`
`• whether claims 1, 4, 6–10, 13, 15, 24, 28–31, 35, 39, 43–46, 50–53, and
`
`55 of U.S. Patent No. 9,795,604 (“the 604 patent”) are anticipated by
`
`the ’085 publication;
`
`• whether claims 1, 4, 6–10, 13, 15, 24, 28–31, 35, 39, 43–46, 50–53, and
`
`55 of the ’604 patent are obvious over the ’085 publication and the
`
`knowledge of a person of ordinary skill in the art;
`
`• whether claims 1, 4, 6–10, 13, 15, 24, 28–31, 35, 39, 43–46, 50–53, and
`
`55 of the ’604 patent are obvious over the ’085 publication,
`
`Shimabukuro-Vornhagen, and Herman;
`
`• whether claims 1, 4, 6–10, 13, 15, 24, 28–31, 35, 39, 43–46, 50–53, and
`
`55 of the ’604 patent are obvious over the ’085 publication,
`
`Shimabukuro-Vornhagen, and Uckun;
`
`• any issues raised in any motion(s); and
`
`• any other issues raised by the parties in their papers filed in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner requests an oral argument with one (1) hour allocated to each
`
`party, including time for rebuttal. To the extent the Board schedules a different
`
`1
`
`
`
`amount of time, Patent Owner requests an amount of time equal to that granted to
`
`Petitioner.
`
`Pursuant to the Office’s notice issued March 13, 2020, Patent Owner
`
`understands that all PTAB oral hearings scheduled to take place after March 13,
`
`2020 will be conducted remotely until further notice and that the Board will provide
`
`instructions on how to participate by video or telephone in advance of the hearing.
`
`Should the current restrictions be lifted by June 19, 2020—the scheduled date
`
`for oral argument, Patent Owner provides the following additional requests.
`
`Patent Owner requests that the panel hear oral argument at the USPTO main
`
`office in Alexandria, Virginia.
`
`Patent Owner also requests the ability to use audio-visual equipment to
`
`display demonstrative exhibits, including a projector and screen to display
`
`PowerPoint slides. If this request for oral argument is granted, Patent Owner will
`
`direct its requests for audio-visual equipment to Trials@uspto.gov.
`
`Patent Owner further requests that twelve spaces be reserved at the oral
`
`hearing to accommodate counsel and corporate representatives. Lastly, Patent
`
`Owner requests that three attorneys be allowed to use computers at the hearing.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Date: May 14, 2020
`
`
`
`By: / William B. Raich /
`William B. Raich, Reg. No. 54,386
`
`
` Counsel for Patent Owner
` Pharmacyclics LLC
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Request for Oral Argument was served electronically via email on May 14,
`
`2020, in its entirety on the following:
`
`Kirk T. Bradley
`Alston & Bird LLP
`101 South Tryon Street, Suite 4000
`Charlotte, NC 28280
`kirk.bradley@alston.com
`
`Siraj M. Abhyankar
`Alston & Bird LLP
`1201 W. Peachtree Street NE #4900
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`shri.abhyankar@alston.com
`
`Christopher L. McArdle
`Alston & Bird LLP
`90 Park Avenue, Suite 1200
`New York, NY 10016
`chris.mcardle@alston.com
`
`
`Petitioner has consented to service by email.
`
`
`Date: May 14, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: / William Esper /
`William Esper
`Legal Assistant
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
