throbber
Leukemia and Lymphoma, Vol. 17. pp. 169-173
`Reprints available directly from the publisher
`Photocopying permitted by license only
`
`0 1995 Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH
`Printed in the United States of America
`
`Cytokine Dysregulation in Chronic Graft Versus
`Host Disease
`
`V. BARAK.1 F. LEVI-SCHAFFER.? B. NISMANl and A. NAGLER3
`
`Departments of Oncology,' Pharmacology? and Bone Marrow Transplantation.3 Hadassah University Hospital and Hebrew University,
`Jerusalem, Israel
`
`(Received March 14. 1994)
`
`Cytokines play a key role in the pathogenesis of chronic Graft versus Host Disease (cGVHD) and
`various studies have shown abberant production of cytokines by immune cells from GVHD patients.
`Based on these findings and others showing that high TNF levels precede the development of CVHD,
`we evaluated inflammatory cytokine levels following BMT and during the development of cGVHD.
`In this study, patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT) who consequently developed
`chronic GVHD were analyzed as to their cytokine production during cGVHD and this was correlated
`with their clinical manifestations. A positive correlation was found between the severity as well as
`the number of major clinical complications and high levels of inflammatory cytokines (IL-IPIL-6
`andTNFa) compared to control patients or to normal donors. Patients undergoing BMT who did not
`develop GVHD, did not produce high levels of IL- I PIL-6 or TNF. High levels of cytokines may be
`used as a tool for assessing novel therapeutic modalities and response to GVHD treatment.
`
`KEY WORDS:
`cytokines
`transplantation (BMT)
`
`chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD)
`
`bone marrow
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Chronic Graft versus Host Disease is a major obstacle to
`successful allogeneic bone marrow
`transplantation
`(BMT). GVHD following allogeneic BMT is caused by
`donor graft T lymphocytes that recognize antigenic dis-
`parities between donor and
`Tissue damage
`associated with GVHD is thought to be caused by T cell
`mediated cytotoxicity4,' and it is possible that additional
`networks of inflammatory cytokines act as mediators of
`acute GVHD.6.7 GVHD is viewed today as a three step
`process, consisting of upregulation of HLA and leukocyte
`adhesion molecules on host target cells; followed by ac-
`tivation of donor immunocompetent T cells by host his-
`tocompatibility antigens, which then proliferate. Finally,
`
`Address lor correspondence: Dr. Arnon Nagler. Bone Marrow
`Transplantation Dept., Hadassah University Hospital. P.O. Box 12000,
`Jerusalem, Israel 9 I 120.
`
`I69
`
`these activated T cells, then secrete cytokines, recruit ad-
`ditional cells, induce the expression of histocompatibility
`antigens, and focus their attack on recipient targets.
`Cytokines play a key role in each of the above
`steps. *-I1 Many cytokines are produced in an aberrant
`in patients with cGVHD12-14
`fashion
`including
`Interleukin-2 (IL-2), soluble IL-2 Receptor (sIL-~R),
`Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
`(TNF-a) and beta (TNF-
`p), Interferon y (IFNy), Interleukin- 1 (IL-la and IL- I p),
`Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Interleukin-4 (IL-4).
`TNF-alpha has a major function in the first step of
`GVHD. In various studies TNF-a has been shown to be
`released from host tissues and to be elevated both in the
`tissues and the serum of mice and humans with chronic
`GVHD.15 Moreover, Holler et al. 16 found a direct corre-
`lation between high TNF levels and transplant related
`complications or survival. Furthermore, the rise in TNF
`levels were shown to precede the development of
`GVHD.I6 The results of bioassays and immunoassays of
`
`SAN EX 1010, Page 1
`
`

`

`I70
`
`V. BARAK ETAL.
`
`TNF levels in patients do not always correlate with the
`clinical picture, suggesting the presence of cytokine in-
`hibitors. An example for this would be IL-1 receptor an-
`tagonist (IL-IRA), which inhibits IL-1, and also prevents
`GVHD.I7
`In addition, high levels of IL-6 have been correlated
`with the onset of acute GVHD as well as the development
`of hepatorenal dysfunction (HRD), and bilateral lung in-
`filtration
`(BLI).Ig High amounts of granulocyte
`macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have
`also been detected in sera from patients with GVHD19 and
`it has been suggested that IFN is an additional mediator
`of GVHD.20
`This study was undertaken in order to assess whether
`the increase in the production of inflammatory cytokines
`could explain the consequent development of cGVHD in
`many patients post-BMT.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Cytokine levels were examined in the sera of BMT pa-
`tients who were diagnosed as having cGVHD according
`to the Seattle clinical and histopathological criteria.21
`In most of the patients more than one evaluation was
`performed during the cGVHD period. Thirty normal in-
`dividuals of compatible age and sex served as controls. In
`addition, we evaluatedcytokine profiles 5-12 months post
`transplant in 11 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) pa-
`tients, 8 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and 6
`chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients who underwent
`allogenlic BMT and did not develop cGVHD. Transplant
`conditioning regimens, allograft cell numbers and treat-
`ment were similar between the study groups and the con-
`trols.
`
`Patients
`
`Thirteen consecutive patients (10 males and 3 females)
`who developed cGVHD were enrolled in this study; mean
`age 16 (4-3 1) years. Six patients had ALL, four AML, one
`CML and two severe aplastic anemia (SAA). All patients
`underwent HLA matched bone marrow transplantation
`(BMT). Of the leukemic patients, four were in first com-
`plete remission (CR), four in second CR, one in third CR
`and one in relapse. The CML patient was transplanted in
`the first chronic phase.
`Eight patients were conditioned with fractionated total
`body irradiation (TBI), ( 1200 cGy in 6 fractions) followed
`by administration of etoposide ( I500 mg/m*), cyclophos-
`phamide (60 mgkg) and melphalan (60 mg/m2) and frac-
`
`tionated total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) (600 cGy in 4
`fractions). Two patients were conditioned with Busulfan
`(16 mgkg in 4 days), cyclophosphamide (200 mgkg in 4
`days) and TLI. The patient with CML was conditioned
`with fractionated TBI (1200 cGy) and cyclophosphamide
`(120 mgkg in 2 days). The patients with SAA were con-
`ditioned with fractionated TLI (1600 cGy in 8 fractions)
`and cyclophosphamide (120 mgkg in 2 days).
`Bone marrow cells were purged with CAMPATH-1
`(IgG2b), a monoclonal rat anti human lymphocyte anti-
`body (anti-CDW52) (1 ug/106 nucleated cells) kindly sup-
`plied by Drs. G. Hale and H. Waldmann, Cambridge
`University (Cambridge, U.K.) in order to deplete T lym-
`phocytes.* No other anti GVHD prophylaxis was given.
`The patients with SAA were treated with cyclosporine A
`in order to prevent graft rejection. The patient with CML
`was transplanted with non T depleted marrow and received
`a combination of cyclosporine A and methotrexate as
`GVHD prophylaxis.
`All patients had cGVHD according to biopsy results
`which included a typical histopathologic picture.1 Three
`patients had mild cGVHD, 5 moderate and 5 severe ex-
`tensive cGVHD according to the Seattle grading criteria.21
`All cases showed cutaneous involvement, either general-
`ized or localized, most had other organ involvement (oral
`mucosa, ocular, liver, gastrointestinal and musculoskele-
`tal). Eight of the cGVHD patients developed acute GVHD
`in the early post BMT period. Three patients developed
`grade I, 2 grade I1 and 1 grade 111. All were treated with
`cyclosporine A (6 mgkg) and methylprednisolone (1-5
`mgkg) and 7 of them had no signs of active GVHD by
`day 100. Five patients had de novo cGVHD. Median onset
`of cGVHD was 120 days, range 100-166 days. They were
`treated with prednisone, cyclosporine A, azathioprine with
`modulation depending on clinical parameters. In addition,
`thalidomide (2 patients), colchicine (2 patients) and low
`dose TLI (2 patients) were also given without substantial
`clinical benefit.
`The following cytokine levels were determined in pa-
`tients' sera by means of radioimmunoassay (RIA) or enzyme
`immunoassay (EIA): IL-lp, IL-2, IL-6, TNFa, GM-CSF,
`yIFN. Cytokine determinations were performed within 5-27
`months (mean 11) following the onset of cGVHD. Some of
`the patients sera was tested more than once.
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`For comparison of mean levels of cytokines in test
`patients, controls and normal donors, we used the Student
`T-test. The correlation between disease severity and mean
`cytokine levels was determined by Spearman correlation
`coefficients.
`
`SAN EX 1010, Page 2
`
`

`

`RESULTS
`
`IL-6 in GVHD
`
`CYTOKINE DYSREGULATION IN cGVHD
`
`171
`
`Cytokine production was evaluated in allogeneic BMTpa-
`tients with cGVHD compared to BMT patients who did
`not develop cGVHD as well as in normal individuals.
`The following cytokines were evaluated: IL- 1 p, IL-2,
`IL-6, TNFa, INFy and GM-CSF. The level of TNF was
`found to be high in 10/13 patients or 19/24 evaluations.
`Only 3 patients (5 evaluations) had undetectable levels of
`TNF (Figure 1). The level of TNFa in most of the patients
`was very high (10-1000 pg/ml compared to normal lev-
`els <I0 pg/ml) (p < 0.001). We observed that the three pa-
`tients who had undetectable levels of TNF developed very
`mild cGVHD (n = 3) while patients who had high or ex-
`tremely high levels of TNF had moderate to severe
`cGVHD (n = 10) (c.c = -0.496). There was no difference
`in TNFa levels between patients with moderate and se-
`vere cGVHD (3 of the patients with very high TNF had
`severe cGVHD while 2 had moderate cGVHD). The level
`of IL-6 was found to be very high (in comparison to nor-
`mal levels p < 0.001) in 11/12 pts or 15/17 evaluations
`ranging between 100&6000pg/ml. Only 1 patient’s serum
`(or 2 evaluations) contained relatively low amounts of IL-
`&although much higher than the level found in normal
`human sera (< 100 pg/ml) (Figure 2). This particular pa-
`tient had very mild cGVHD. All of the patients with mod-
`erate or severe cGVHD, had very high levels of IL-6. The
`remaining 2 patients who developed mild cGVHD, had
`high and very high levels of IL-6, respectively. IL- 1 p was
`found also in high levels in 11/13 pts or 25/31 evaluations
`(600-10000 pg/ml) as compared to normal donors (p <
`0.001). 2/13 patients (or 6 evaluations) were in the nor-
`mal range. The 2 patients with low levels of IL- 1 p had
`mild cGVHD. The third patient with mild cGVHD, had
`elevated levels of IL-1p. All of the patients with moder-
`
`TNFa in GVHD
`
`Ir z c
`
`Patients
`
`Figure 1 TNFa levels in GVHD patients and control normal donors.
`
`Patients
`
`Figure 2
`
`IL-6 levels in GVHD patients and control normal donors.
`
`IL-IP in GVHD
`
`-
`i
`
`Figure 3
`
`Patients
`IL- I p levels in GVHD patients and control normal donors.
`
`ate and severe cGVHD had high or very high levels of
`IL-1 p (Figure 3).
`GM-CSF was found to be elevated in 10/12 patients (or
`13/17 evaluations)-although
`it was considered to be high
`only in 5/12 patients. Two patients had undetectable lev-
`els and the 2 patients with low GM-CSF had mild cGVHD
`(Figure 4).
`Most (8/12) of the patients or 10114 evaluations had un-
`detectable or low levels of IFN y. Only 4/12 patients (or
`4/14 evaluations) had high levels (Figure 5). Out of the 4
`pts with high levels of IFN y, 2 had moderate and 2 had
`severe cGVHD.
`IL-2 levels were undetectable in all of the patients (Data
`not shown). As an additional control, we analyzed sera
`from patients diagnosed with ALL, AML and CML who
`underwent allogeneic BMT and were matched in age and
`sex to the test group. These patients did not produce high
`
`SAN EX 1010, Page 3
`
`

`

`V. BARAK ET AL.
`
`GM-CSF in GVHD
`
`172
`
`t -
`3
`r m Y
`E
`c1
`
`In this study we have shown that patients who under-
`went BMT and subsequently developed cGVHD produce
`high or even extremely high levels of inflammatory cy-
`tokines as IL- 1 p, IL-6, TNFa. Moreover, we found a good
`correlation between the severity of GVHD and the ele-
`vated cytokine levels.
`In contrast, patients who underwent BMT and did not
`develop cGVHD, produced these cytokines within a nor-
`mal range. The level of other cytokines such as GM-CSF
`or IFNy was relatively low in most of these patients.
`The level of TNF observed is in accordance with results
`obtained by Holler et al. 16 and in discrepancy with other
`studies which did not find any correlation between cy-
`tokine levels and the severity of GVHD.13.18.20 The cause
`for these discrepancies may be dependent on the exact time
`of cytokine evaluation or on the different evaluation meth-
`ods with different sensitivities.
`Holler et a1.,16 however, showed that high levels of TNF
`generally precede GVHD. As we did not measure cytokine
`levels of these patients before the onset of GVHD, we can-
`not verify this observation. In a recent study by Tong er
`d . 1 3 although TNF levels were shown to precede major
`complications and the development of cGVHD in trans-
`plant patients, this cytokine increased significantly within
`seven days post GVHD diagnosis, but did not correlate
`with disease activity. Additional studies did not find a cor-
`relation between IFNy, IL-2 and GM-CSF, and the devel-
`opment of cGVHD.
`Monitoring the level of serum TNF should help the eval-
`uation of severity of chronic GVHD and allow a greater
`degree of differential treatment in the future.
`Future anti-GVHD therapy could perhaps be directed
`towards the blocking of the production of andor the ef-
`fects of cytokines, whereas most of the established thera-
`pies today are directed towards immunosuppression of the
`
`Cytoklnci in GVHD
`
`T
`
`Figure 6
`Cytokines (IL-1,IL-6. TNF) production in controls, GVHD
`and control ALL, CML and AML patients.
`
`Patients
`
`Figure 4 GM-CSF levels in GVHD patients and control normal
`donors.
`
`INF in CVHD
`
`c
`t -
`r 6
`
`Patienls
`Interferon IFN levels in GVHD patients and control normal
`
`Figure 5
`donors.
`
`levels of IL-Ip, IL-6 or TNFa in contrast to the patients
`who developed GVHD (Figure 6).
`In conclusion, a majority of the patients who developed
`cGVHD had high levels of inflammatory cytokines (IL-
`I j3, TNFa and IL-6) in their sera (Figure 6) compared to
`sera from normal healthy donors or controls.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Measurement of cytokines has become a valuable tool not
`only in elucidating pathophysiologic mechanisms but
`more importantly in diagnosis and prognosis of a variety
`of diseases. Previous studies carried out in patients with
`acute or chronic GVHD revealed a cytokine cascade that
`IL-lj3, IL-6, TNFa and
`includes production of
`I ~ ~ y . 6 9 .
`I I- I4
`
`SAN EX 1010, Page 4
`
`

`

`CYTOKINE DYSREGULATION IN cGVHD
`
`I73
`
`cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) using cyclosporin A,
`FK506, Rifamicin, steroids, methotrexate, or monoclonal
`antibodies. One method attempted to avoid GVHD was T
`cell depletion' while cytokine antagonists (IL-4, IL- 10) or
`combinations of antagonists such as IL-IRA and sTNF-R
`could be used as an alternative approach. Recently, anti
`TNF compounds such as pentoxifylline and ciprofloxacin
`and anti TNF monoclonal antibodies, have been intro-
`duced as a means of prevention and treatment of trans-
`plant related toxicity and GVHD.**-*4 It is important to
`note that cytokine release (TNF-a, IL- 1 p) from host
`macrophages and endothelial tissues in response to injury
`due to conditioning regimens and/or endotoxins, is inde-
`pendent of HLA-restriction. This may explain the occur-
`rence of GVHD despite genotypic HLA identity between
`the donor and the recipient.
`IL-IRA has been shown to prevent GVHD in a murine
`model without impeding the immunologic and hematopoi-
`etic reconstitution,l7 and recently, clinical phase I/II trials
`using IL-IRA to treat steroid resistant GVHD have begun.
`In summary, we have shown increased levels of in-
`flammatory cytokines (IL-I p, IL-6, TNFa) in cGVHD pa-
`tients. Moreover, a statistically significant correlation was
`found between the severity of cGVHD and the levels of
`these cytokines. We believe that this correlation may be
`due to the role of inflammatory cytokines in the patho-
`physiology of cCVHD. Furthermore, levels of these cy-
`tokines may be used as a tool for assessing new therapeutic
`modalities as well as efficacy and response in GVHD.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. O'Reilly. R. J. (1982) Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: cur-
`rent status and future directions. Blood, 62, 941-964.
`2. Slavin, S.. Ed. (1984) Bone marrow and organ transplantation:
`Achievements and Goals. Amsterdam; Elsevier.
`3. Slavin, S. and Nagler. A. (1991) New developments in bone mar-
`row transplantation. Current Opinion in Oncologv. 33, 254-27 l.
`4. Ferrara, J. L. M. and Deeg, H. J. D. (1991) Graft versus host dis-
`ease. Nen EnRI. J. Med.. 324. 667474.
`5. DeCast,G.C..Gratama.J. W.. Ringden,O. andcluckman, E. (1987)
`The multifactorial etiology of graft versus host disease. Immunol.
`Today. 8.209-21 2.
`6. Jadus. M. R. and Wepsic. H. J. ( 1992) The role of cytokines in graft-
`versus-host reactions and disease. Bone Marrow Transplantation,
`10. 1-14.
`
`7. Weinberg, K., Lawrence, K., Barrantos. B.. Lenarsky, C. and
`Parkman, R. (1992) The role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of
`human graft versus host disease. Exper. Hemarol.. 20. 7 17
`(Abstract).
`8. Smith, S. R.. Terminelli, C., Kenworthy-Bott. L. and Phillips, D. L.
`(1991) A study of cytokine production in acute GVHD. Cell
`Immunol.. 134. 336348.
`9. Knulst. A. C. (1992) Cytokines in lethal GVHD. Transplant Int., 5,
`5679-5683.
`10. Ferrara, J. L. M. (1992) Advances in GVHD: Novel lymphocyte
`subsets and cytokine dysregulation. B M Transplant., 10 (Suppl. I),
`1G14.
`1. Amtin, J. H. and Ferrara. J. L. M. (1992) Cytokine dysregulation
`and acute graft versus-host disease. Blood, 80. 2964-2968.
`2. Parkman, R., Lenarsky, C., Santos, R.. Barrantes, B. and Weinberg.
`K. ( I 99 I ) Cytokines during acute graft versus host disease (GVHD)
`following matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation. Blood,
`78,286a (Abstr.)
`3 . Tong, J., Viale, M.. Bacigalupoe, A,, Podesta, M., Sogno, G.,
`Tedone, E. and Marmont, A. M. (1992) Cytokine serum levels and
`acute graft versus host disease after allogeneic bone marrow trans-
`plantation. Hematologica, 77,365-366.
`14. Jadus, M. R. and Wepsic, H. T. ( I 992) The role of cytokines in graft
`versus host reactions and disease. Bone Marrow Transplantntion,
`10, 1-14.
`15. Fuji, Y., Koku, K. and Kaneko, T. (1992) TNF is associated with
`chronic GVHD in BMT recipients. Bone Marrow Transplantation,
`10, 194-195.
`16. Hol1er.E.. Ko1b.H. J.,Moller,A., Kempeni,J.etal. (1990)Increased
`serum levels of tumor necrosis factor precede major complications
`of bone marrow transplantation. Blood, 75. 101 1-1016.
`17. McCarthy, P. L.. Abhyanhan, S.. Neben, S. et al. (1991) Inhibition
`of Interleukin- I by an Interleukin- I receptor antagonist prevents
`Graft-Versus Host Disease. Blood, 78. 19 15- I9 1 8.
`18. Symington. F. W., Symington, B. E.. Liu, P. Y.. Viguet, H.,
`Santhanam, U. and Sengal, P. B. (1992) The relationship of serum
`IL-6 levels to acute graft versus host disease and hepatorenal dis-
`ease after human bone marrow transplantation. Transplanfarion, 54.
`455774562.
`19. Kanamara, A. and Hara, H. (1987) Hematopoietic factors in graft
`versus host reaction. Internad. J. Cell Cloning, 5.45M62.
`20. Reyes, V. E. and Klimpel, G. R. (1987) Interferon alphaheta syn-
`thesis during acute graft versus host disease. Transplantarion, 43,
`41 2 4 1 6.
`21. Barrett, A. J. (1989) Graft versus hostdisease-clinical features and
`biology. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 4. 18-22.
`22. Bianco, J. A.. Appelbaum, F. R., Nemunaitis, J. etal. (1991) Phase
`1-11 trial of pentoxifylline for the prevention of transplanted-related
`toxicities following bone marrow transplantation. Blood, 79,
`1205-121 I.
`23. Herve. P., Flesch, M., Tiberghien. P. etal. (1992) Phase 1-11 trial of
`a monoclonal anti TNF alpha antibody (B-C7) in the treatment of
`refractory severe acute GVHD. Blood, 79, 3362-3368.
`24. Keetter, Y., Singer, A,, Nagler. A,, Slavin. S. and Fabian, 1. (1994)
`Ciprofloxacin enhances hematopoiesis and the antibacterial activ-
`ity of peritoneal polymorphonuclears in lethally irradiated bone mar-
`row transplanted mice. Exper. Hematol., 22. 360-365.
`
`SAN EX 1010, Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket