throbber

`
`IWW."',- u—-—-——
`
`..
`
`._W
`
`l
`
`x
`
`J
`
`‘51” “0- 24 (Dec, 3 2009)
`efiera| Collection
`W1 BLsm
`
`Cytokine production
`
`.
`
`-u
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mel-ea}? n'
`
`clam“
`
`ans-mm mmumu Mum
`
`Antigen presentatior
`
`PROPERTY OF THE
`NATIONAL
`LIBRARY OF
`MEDICINE
`
`i
`F
`
`
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 1
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 1
`
`

`

`blood
`
`JOURNAL OF
`
`THE AMEFlEGAN
`SOCIETY OF
`HEMATOLDGY
`
`Blood, Jortmal of The American Society of Herrmlol'ogr
`{print ISSN 0006-4975 , online ISSN 15280020). is published
`weekly every Thursday. except for the last week in December,
`(52 times weekly), plus the ASH annual meeting abstracts in
`November, by the American Society of Hematology (ASH),
`1900 M Street, NW, Suite 200. Washington, DC 20036.
`Printed in the United States 01' America. Periodicals postage
`paidatWt-ishington, DC, and additional mailing offices.
`Postmaster: Send change—of-address information to
`Blood, Journal oftlre American Society of Heirrntalogy.
`Subscription Office, 1900 M Street, NW, Suite 200.
`Washington, DC 20036.
`Canadian regulations: Publications Mai] Agreement
`No: 40038947. Return undeliverable Canadian ad»
`dresses to: Circulation Dept. or DPGM, 4960-2 Walker
`Road, Windsor, ON N9A 633.
`
`Manuscript submissions
`Consult
`the Author Guide printed in each issue of
`Blood (and posted on the Web site at www.blood
`journalorg) before submitting your manuscript online at
`http:/tsubmit.bloodjoumnl.org.
`
`2009 subscription rates
`
`Institution. Worldwide Oniine Only: $1,245 (Tier 2);
`$1.355 (Tier 3)
`US Institution, Online plus Print: $1,400 (Tier 2); $1.510
`(Tier 3)
`International Institution, Ontine plus Print: $1.610 (Tier
`2); $1.720 (Tier 3)
`US individual. Online plus Print: $840
`international Individual, Ordine plus Print: $1.050
`
`*All issues shipped via expedited service at no addi-
`tional charge.
`
`Multiple Site Subscriptions: Contact bloodsubs®
`hematologyorg.
`
`Price tor singlelback issues: 337 (US)I$42 (internw
`tional). Single issues. both current and back. exist in
`limited quantities and are offered for sale subject to
`availability.
`Pay-per-view: Full-text online access to all articles
`is free one year after publication. Nonsubseribcrs may
`purchase 24»hour access to the full
`text of any article
`published in the preceding 12 months through the
`pay-per-view option on the Blood website.
`
`Internet
`BtoodHome Page: wwwbloodjournalbrg.
`ASH Home Page: www.11ematology.org.
`Manuscript Submission: submit.bloodjournal.org.
`
`Copyright
`Copyright 0 2009 by The American Society of Hernatoh
`ogy. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may
`be reproduced (see exception below), stored in a re~
`trieval system. translated, or transmitted in any form or
`by any means now or hereafter known, electronic or
`mechanical, without permission in writing from the
`Publisher. The American Society of Hematology. Ad-
`dress l‘or correspondence: Blood Publishing Office, 1900
`M Street. NW. Suite 200, Washington. DC 20036.
`Important notice: Authors retain certain nonexclusive
`copyrights. For further information on rights artd permis-
`sions, see wwwbloodjournalnrg/misclrightsohtml.
`The copyright owner consents that copies of articles may
`be made for personal or internal use, or for the [xrrsonal or
`inlcmal use of specific clients. for those registered with 1hr:
`Copyright Clearance Center,
`Inc (222 Rosewood Drive.
`Danvers. MA 01923; (978] 7508400; www.copyright.com).
`This consent is given on the condition that the copier pay the
`stated per-copy fees through the Copyright Clearance Center.
`lac, for copying beyond that permitted by Sections 1'07 and
`108 of tire US Copyright law (Fair Use). This consent does
`not extend to other kinds of copying. such as copying for
`general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes.
`for creating new collective works, or for resale. For those kinds
`of purposes. pemtission must be sought from the Publisher
`(see above).
`
`Advertising representation
`To place orders for product advertisements. classifieds.
`or commercial reprints. contact Kevin Dunn, Cunning-
`ham Associates, 180 Old Tapper: Road, Old Tappan. NJ
`07675. Telephone: 201—767—4170; fax; 20l-767—8065:
`e-mail: kdunn©cunnasso.com.
`
`Disclaimer
`
`The ideas and opinions expressed in Blood do not necessarily
`reflect those of The American Society of Hematology or the
`Editors of Blood Publication of an advertisement or other
`product mention in Blood should not be construed as an
`endorsement of the product or the manufacturer‘s claims.
`Readers are encouraged to contact the manufacturer with any
`questions about the features or limitations of the products
`mentioned. The American Society of Hematology does not
`assume any responsibility For any injury andlor damn e to
`persons or property arising from or related to any use of the
`material contained in this periodical. The readeris advised to
`check the appropriate medical
`literature and the product
`infomtation currently provided by the manufacturer of each
`drug to be administered to verify the dosage, the method and
`duration of administration. or contraindications. It is the
`responsibility ofthc treating physician or other health care
`professional, relying on his or her independent experi—
`ence and knowledge of the patient, to determine drug
`dosages and the best treatment for the patient.
`
`Subscription information, claims,
`and changes of address
`Customer service tor subscribers: 1-866-328-8560 (US and
`Canada); 1-202-292-0280 (outside US and Canada); fax:
`1-202—292-6010; email: bloodsubs@ hematologytorg. Cor-
`respondence regarding subscriptions and changes of
`address should be addressed to Blow! Journal Subscrip»
`tion Office, 1900 M Street. NW. Suite 200, Washington,
`BC 20036. Checks should be made payable to “Blood
`Subscriptions.“
`ASI-i Members should send their change-of—addrcss
`information to the ASH Membership Department. 1900
`Indexing & abstracting
`M Street. NW. Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036.
`All change-of—addrcss notices should be sent at least
`Blood is indexed and abstracted by Index Mcdicus.
`6 weeks before the first issue is to be mailed to the new
`Excerpts Medica. Current Contentstife Sciences. Cur—
`address. Provide both old and new addresses.
`rent Contcntleliaical Medicine. Science Citation Index,
`Claims: Claims must be submitted within 4 months of
`SCISEARCH. Automatic Subject Citation Alert.
`lSl/
`BIOMED, and 010318.
`the publication date {6 months for intcniational subscribers).
`
`
`The American Society of Hematology
`1900 M Street. NW. Suite 200
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`O“ V Or
`.9
`g
`e
`1L
`
`sq
`a
`909
`09w a
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 2
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 2
`
`

`

`bioed
`
`3 DECEMBER 2009 - VOLUME 114, NUMBER 24
`
`CONTENTS
`
`COVER LEGEND
`
`B cells are central players of immoral immune responses.Al'ter binding to their
`antigens, Immoral antibodies can lead to complement activation, antibody-mediated
`cellular eytotoxicity, and Fe-mediated endocytosis. Besides producing antibodieS,
`15 cells exert several other important antibody-independent functions such as antigen
`presentation, cytokine production, and immunoregulation. Professional illustration
`by A. Y. Chen. See the article by Shimabukuro-Vornhagen et al on page 4919.
`
` “OWN“ °F INSIDE moon
`
`
`ERIC
`
`1‘"
`THE AM
`SOCIETV 0*
`HEMATOLOGV
`
`4913 Why some cells are “more equal" than others
`M. Z. Ratajczok and D.-M. Shin
`
`4914
`
`Fine-tuning targeted therapy of CML
`N. P. Shah
`
`4915
`
`Ready to analyze genetically modified human platelets
`M. Gawaz
`
`BLOOD WORK
`
`491? Blast crisis
`A. Pmsad and A. Asija
`
`by
`4919
`The role of B cells in the pathogenesis of graft-versus-host disease
`A. Shimabukuro-Vomlmgen, M. .T. Hallek, R. F. Slorb. and M. S. van Bergweit—Balldon
`
`CL'IqICAL TRIALSANDM
`OBSERVATIONS
`4928
`Evidence of serum immunoglobulin abnormalities up to 9.8 years before diflgmfis
`_
`of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a prospective study
`l-l.-T. Tsui. N. E. Caporaso, R. A. Kyle. J. A. Kntzmann, A. Dispenziel'i. R- B- Hayes. 0* H" Mart"
`M. Albitar. P. Ghia. S. V. Rajkumar. and O. Landgren
`
`4938
`
`Nilotinib for the frontline treatment of Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia
`G. Rosti. F. Palandri. F. Castagneni. M. Breceia. L. Levam. G. Gugliotm. A. Capucci,
`M. Cedrone, C. Fava, T. lmermesoli. G. Rage Cambrin. F. Stagno. M. Tiribeili. M- Amabile.
`s. Luatti, A. Poerio. s. Soverini. N. Testoni, o. Maninelli, o. Alimena. F. Pane. G. Saglifi- and
`M. Baccarami. for the GIMEMA CML Working Party
`
`4939 Chronic myeloid leukemia: a prospective comparison of interphasc fluorescence in
`situ hybridization and chromosome banding analysis for the definition of oomph“e
`cytogenetie response: a study of the GIMEMA CML WP
`N. Testoni, G. Manocchi, S. Lualti. M. Amabile. C. Buldazzi. M. Slacchini, M. Nanni.
`G. Rege-Cambrin. E. Giugliano, U. Giussani. E. Abruzzese, S. Karim. M. G. Grimoidi,
`A. Gozzelti, B. Crescenzi. C. Carcassi, P. Bernasconi. A. Cuneo, F. Albano, G. Fuguzza.
`A. Zaeeuria. G. Mnrtiuclli, F. Pane. (1120515. and M. Baccarani
`
`<
`am 10.3 DECEMBER 2009 - VOLUME 114, NUMBER 24
`
`vii
`
`.
`cormnuen 0N um
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 3
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 3
`
`

`

`'
`.
`l
`I
`I
`n
`n
`4944 Dasatimb treatment of chronic-phase chronic myclmd leukemia. analySIS 0:.
`responses according to preexisting BCR—ABL mutations
`d
`M. c. Miiller, E. E. Cones, D.-W. Kim. B. J. Druker, P. Erhen, R. Pasquini. s. Branfor -
`T. P. Hughes, J. P. Radich, L. Ploughmim. J. Mukhopadhyay, and A. Hochhaus
`
`4954 Brief report Abnormal serum free light chain ratio in patients with multiple
`myeloma in complete remission has strong association with the presence of
`oligocloiial bands: implications for stringent complete remission definition
`C. Fernandez de Lance, M. T. Cibeira. M. Elena, J. LArostegui, L. Rosifiol. M- Rowm.
`X. Filella, .l. Yagiie, and J. Biadé
`
`4957 Brief report Classification of amyloidosis by laser microdissectioii and mass
`Spectrometry—based proteomic analysis in clinical biopsy Specimens
`I. A. Vrana, J. D. Gamez,
`B. J. Madden, J. D. Thais, H. R. Bergen Ill, and A. D0811“
`
`4960
`
`. .
`Induction ofB-ccll development in adult mice reveals the ability of bone m3!"
`produce B-la cells
`
`ow to
`
`5. Dijber, M. Hefner, M. Krcy, s. Lienenklaus, B. Roy, E. Hobeika, M. Reth. T. Buchv
`A. Waisman, K. Kietschmer. and S. Weiss
`
`4968 Undifferentiated hematopoietic cells are characterized by a genome-"lide
`undermethylation dip around the transcription start site and a liieral'Chica]
`epigenetic plasticity
`Y. s. Chung, H. J. Kim, “it-M. Kim. S.-H. Hang. K.-R. Kwon, s. An. J.-H. Park, S. Leer *1
`I.-H. Oh
`
`nd
`
`HEMATOPOIESIS AND
`STEM CELLS
`
`IMMUNOBIOLOGY
`
`__ ___ ___________ __ __ ___W
`4979
`Cell-cell cooperation at the T helper cell/mast cell immunological synapse
`N. Gaudenzio. N. Espagnolle, L. T. Mars, R. Liblau, S. Valitutti, and E. Espinosa
`
`4989
`
`ti en
`.
`B-cell follicle development remodels the conduit system and allows Somme an g
`delivery to follicular dendritic cells
`M. Bajenoff and R. N. Germain
`
`hard
`0. Blanchard-Rehner, A. s. Pulickal, c. M. .Tol—van derZijde, M. D. Shape. and A- J' P"
`
`'tro is
`-
`.
`5003 Briefreport ATG-induced eXDmssion of FOXP3 in human CD4+ T cells I“ v'
`115
`cc
`associated with T-cell activation and not the induction of FOXP3+ T regulatory
`R. Broady. J. Yu, and M. K. Levings
`
`LYMPHOID
`NEOPLASIAW
`007 Characterization eta rituximab variant with potent antiturnor activity ”gain“
`rituximab—resistant B-ccll lymphoma
`_
`.
`B’ L" L 3130- H- GEO: C- Wang. X. Zhang, L. Wu. L. Chen, Q. Tong. W. Qran- H- WM
`Y. Goo
`
`,and
`
`viii
`
`BLOOD, 3 DECEMBER 2009 - VOLUME 114. NUMBER 24
`
`GONT'"UE
`
`DONx
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 4
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 4
`
`

`

`5016
`
`TC-PTP is required for the maintenance ofMYC-driven B~cell lymphomas
`R. M. Young. A. Polsky, and Y. RefaeIi
`
`
`
`MYELOID- _ _WNEOPLASlA
`5024 Cotreatment with panobinostat and JAKZ inhibitor TG101209 attenuates
`JAK2V617F levels and signaling and exerts synergistic cytotoxic effects against
`human myeloproliferative neoplastic cells
`Y. Wang. W. Fiskus, D. G. Chung, K. M. Buckley, K. Natarajan, R. Rao. A. Joshi, R. Balusu.
`S. Koul. J. Chen. A. Saveie, C. Ustun, A. P. Jilicila. P. Atadja, R. L. Levine, and K. N. Bhalla
`
`5034
`
`FLT3-ITD up-regulates MCL-l to promote survival of stem cells in acute myeloid
`,
`leukemia via FLTS-lTD-specific STATS activation
`.
`G. Yoshimoto, T. Miyamoto. S. Jabbarzadch-Tabrizi, T. lino, J. L. Rocnik, Y. Kikushlge. Y- My"
`T. Shima, H.1wasaki. K. Takenaka, K. Nagafuji. S.-i. Mizuno, H. Niiro. G. D. Gilliland. and
`K. Akashi
`
`PLATELETS AND-
`THHOMBOPOIESIS
`
`_ __.—.—-——-——*"
`_ _
`5044 Human platelets produced in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immumdeficient
`(NOD/SCID) mice upon transplantation of human cord blood CD34+ cells are
`functionally active in an ex vivo flow model of thrombosis
`l. I. Sailes, T. Thijs. C. Brunaud, S. F. De Meyer, J. Thys, K. Vanhoorelbeke, and H. Deckmyn
`
`THHOMBOSIS AND.
`HEMOSTASIS
`
`.
`
`_ __ fifim'
`5052 Urokinase-type plasminogen activator increases hepatocyte growth factor activity
`required for skeletal muscle regeneration
`T. H. Sisson, M.-H. Nguyen, B. Yu, M. L. Novak, R. H. Simon, and T. J. Koh
`
`% 5
`
`Inducing the tryptophan catabolie pathway, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO): for
`suppression of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) lethality
`in K- Jasperson, C. Bucher, A. Panoskaltsis—Monari, A. L. Mellor, D. H. Munn, and B. R. Blazaf
`
`062
`
`5071
`
`The transfer of adaptive immunity to CMV during hematopoietic stem cell
`transplantation is dependent on the specificity and phenotype of CMV—specific
`T cells in the donor
`
`P. Scheinberg,1. J. Melenhorst, 1. M. Brenchiey. B. J. HilI, N. F. Hansel, p. K. ChanopadhyaY-
`M. Roederer, L. J. Picker. D. A. Price. A. .l. Barrett, and D. C. Douek
`
`TRANSPLANTATION
`
`VASCULAR BIOLOGY
`
`m5
`
`An impaired transendothelial migration potential of chronic lymphocytic leukemia
`(CLL) cells can be linked to ephrin-A4 expression
`E. M. Trinidad, M. Ballestcros. J. Zuloaga, A. Zapata, and L. M, Alonso—Colmenal
`
`081
`
`5091
`
`Pcrieyte recruitment daring vasculogenic tube assembly stimulates endothelial
`basement membrane matrix formation
`A. N. Stratrnan. K. M. Malone, R. D. Mahan, M. J. Davis, and G. E. Davis
`
`5102
`
`Endothelial cell ADAMTS-I3 and VWF: production,
`cleavage
`
`release, and VWF string
`
`N. A. Turner, L. Nolasco, Z. M. Rugged. and J. L. Moake
`
`x
`
`BLOOD. 3 DECEMBER 2009 - VOLUME 114, NUMBER 24
`
`CONTINUE” 0’”
`
`II
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 5
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 5
`
`

`

`OTHER DEPARTMENTS
`kw
`xvii Author Guide
`
`ib
`
`Classifieds
`
`SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
`
`m A
`
`ll manuscripts, including figures, should be submitted elecironicaliy at
`http://submitbioodjoumalorg to Editor-in-Chief Cynthia Dunbar, MD; Before submitting your
`paper, review Bloadis‘ Author Guide at http://www.bloodjouma],org. If you need help during the
`submission procoss, contact the Editorial Office by phone at 202-776-0548 or via c-mail at
`editorial®hematology.org.
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 6
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 6
`
`

`

`
`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`«a. A
`
`m
`
`vagina;-
`
`w- a.
`
`r."
`
`The role of B cells in the pathogenesis of graft—versuswhost disease
`
`Alexander Shimabukuro-Vornhagen,T Michael J. Hallek,1 Rainer F. Storb,2 and Michael 8. von BergweIt—Baildoni
`
`‘Laboratory for Tumor and Transplantation immunology. Stem Cell Transplantation Program and Max Eder Junior Research Group, Department I of Internal
`Medicine. University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; and 2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
`
`Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell trans-
`plantation is an established treatment mo-
`dality for malignant and nonmalignant
`hematologic diseases. Acute and chronic
`graft-versus-host diseases (GVHDs) are a
`major cause of morbidity and mortality
`after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
`T cells have been identified as key play-
`ers in the graft-versus—host reaction and,
`therefore, most established drugs used
`
`against GVHD target T cells. Despite our
`knowledge on the pathogenesis of the
`GVH reaction, success of established
`therapies for prevention and treatment of
`GHVD is unsatisfactory. Recently, animal
`and human studies demonstrated that
`B cells are involved in the immunopatho-
`physiology of acute and chronic GVHD.
`Early phase clinical trials of B-cell deple-
`tion with rituximab have shown beneficial
`
`effects on both acute and chronic GVHD.
`This review summarizes the current ex-
`perimental and clinical evidence for the
`involvement of B cells in the pathogene-
`sis of acute and chronic GVHD and dis-
`cusses the clinical implications for the
`management of patients undergoing allo-
`geneic stem cell transplantation. (Blood.
`2009;114:4919-4927)
`
`Introduction
`
`Allogeneic hematopoictic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an
`established, potentially curative treatment modality for malignant
`and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. Graft-versus-host disease
`(GVHD)
`is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after
`allogencic HSCT and limits its wider use. Traditionally, GVHD has
`been divided into 2 forms, acute and chronic, based on the time of
`its onset. Acute GVHD has been defined as disease occurring in the
`first 100 days after transplantation, whereas chronic GVHD occurs
`after day 100. This arbitrary distinction based on the time of onset
`fails to reflect
`the different pathophysiologic mechanisms and
`clinical manifestations of acutc and chronic GVHD, however.
`Acute GVHD can occur after day 100 in patients who received a
`nonmycloablative conditioning regimen or donor lymphocyte
`infusions. In addition, GVHD with typical clinical features of
`chronic GVHD can develop well before day 100 and concurrent
`with acute GVHD. Therefore,
`the National
`institutes of Health
`consensus development project has defined new criteria for the
`diagnosis, staging, and response assessment of chronic GVHD,”
`Only a few effective therapies are currently available for the
`treatment of both forms of GVHD. The established immunosupprcs-
`sivc agents are mostly nonspecific and unfortunately associated
`with severe side effects,
`in particular the susceptibility to life
`threatening infections. Therefore, novel more selective agents are
`urgently needed.
`GVHD is an immuncemediatcd disease that results from a
`
`ecules and cell types involved in the biology of the graft-versus—
`host reaction.
`
`Because acute GVHD is thought to be mediated mainly by
`donor T cells. preventive and therapeutic treatment strategies
`have focused primarily on the inhibition of T—cell function.
`Recent animal studies suggest that B cells might also play an
`important role in the biology of GVHD. Further circumstantial
`evidence for the involvement of B cells in GVHD pathogenesis
`comes from reports of successful
`treatment of GVHD with
`B-cell depletion. The mechanisms by which B cells contribute
`to acute and chronic GVHD currently are only incompletely
`understood. Here, we provide an overview of the experimental
`and clinical evidence for a pathogenic role of B cells in GVHD
`and evaluate the implications with regard to B cclletargctcd
`therapies for the treatment of GVHD. We conclude by providing
`an outlook on novel 8 cell—specific approaches that might prove
`beneficial for the treatment of GVHD.
`
`B-cell functions in health and disease
`
`B cells are central players of the humoral immune response (Figure
`1). They are specialized in the production of antibodies and thereby
`provide a protective immune defense against bacteria, viruses, and
`harmful protein antigens such as toxins. After binding to their target
`antigen antibodies can lead to complement activation, antibody-
`complex interaction between donor and recipient adaptive immu-
`mediated cellular cytotoxicity, immune complex formation, and
`nity. Donor—derived CD4+ and CD8‘ T lymphocytes have classi—
`Fermediatcd endocytosis. Over the last decade this view, which
`cally been considered to be the main effector cells mediating
`focused on the importance of B cells for the humoral immune
`GVHD pathogenesis. In fact, removal of chlls from transplant
`response, has changed dramatically. Accumulating evidence sug-
`inocula almost completely prevents GVHD from developing,
`gests that apart from antibody production B cells contribute to the
`immune response by important antibody-independent mechanisms
`however, at the price of increased incidences of graft rejection and
`disease recurrence. In recent years, basic and clinical research has
`such as presentation of antigen, the production of cytokines and
`chemokines, as well as by acting as immunorcgulatory cells.
`provided a more detailed mechanistic understanding of the mol-
`
`
`Submitted October 21, 2008; accepted April 14, 2009. F'republished online as
`Blood First Edition paper, September 11. 2009: DOI 10.1182fblood-2003-1D-
`161638.
`
`© 2009 by The American Society of Hematology
`
`BLOOD, 3 DECEMBER 2009 - VOLUME 114, NUMBER 24
`
`4919
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 7
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 7
`
`

`

`4920
`
`SHIMABUKURO-VOHNHAGEN et al
`
`BLOOD, 3 DECEMBER 2009 ' VOLUME 114, NUMBER 24
`
`Antibody production
`
`Cytokr'ne production
`
`
`
`Figure 1. Overview of the 8-09" functions and their
`potential relevance for GVHD. Bcells contribute to
`immune responses by antibody-mediated and antibody-
`independent mechanisms. Antibodies produced by B cells
`can lead to complement activation, antibody-dependent
`cell-mediated cytoloxicily, and Foreceptor antigen up-
`take and phagocylosis. B cells can furthermore secrete a
`large number of proinflammatory cytokines including lL—2.
`TNF—a.
`lL-G,
`|L-12, MIF, and interferon—y that activate a
`large number of immune celts such as T cells (including
`Th1? cells), macrophages, and natural killer (NK) cells
`and have been shown to be involved in regulation of the
`GVH reaction. Antigen presentation by activated B cells
`that have urn-regulated major histooompatibility complex
`and costirnulatory moiecuies such as COED and CD86
`leads to CD4+ and 008+ T—celi activation and diflerentia~
`tion. Depending on the B-oell subset and the nature of lire
`activation stimulus B lymphocytes can also act as immu-
`noregulatory cells that induce peripheral (304* and {203+
`T-cell tolerance,
`inhibit dendritic cells, and induce and
`expand regulatory Tcells. Professional illustration by
`A. Y. Chen.
`
`Antigen presentation by B cells plays a fundamental role during
`physiologic immune responses. After activation via the B-cell
`receptor (BCR) and costimulatory receptors such as CD40, B lym—
`phocytes become potent antigen-presenting cells (APCs).3 What
`sets B cells apart from other APCs is their unique ability of
`antigen-specific antigen uptake through the BCR. After binding to
`the BCR B lymphocytes internalize antigen and the internalized
`antigens are subsequently processed and presented in the context of
`major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II as well as
`cross-presented through MHC class 1.4 Activated B cells can prime
`both CD45r and CBS+ T cells in vivo‘v5 and antigen presentation by
`B cells is important in determining the level of T—cell responses.
`This was revealed by experiments with mice that lack MHC class 11
`specifically on B cells but not on dendritic cells (DCs), which were
`characterized by impaired expansion and differentiation of T cells
`after immunization.6 In addition to presenting antigen B lympho-
`cytes can generate and secrete several cytokines and chemokines.
`They can thereby shape the type and strength of the immune
`response by activation and recruitment of other immune cells. For
`instance, analogous to the CD4+ effector Twcell subsets Harris et a]
`have identified 2 functionally distinct B—cell subsets, termed B ef-
`fectorl and B effector2 cells, that differentially regulate T—cell
`responses by the production of different sets of cytokines.7
`In several autoimmune diseases antibody—independent B—cell
`functions play an important role. More than half of the of the
`developing B cells in the bone marrow express autoreactive B—cell
`receptors (BCRS).8 These autoreactive B cells are usually deleted
`or anergized but failure of tolerance checkpoints can lead to escape
`from deletion of selfrreactive B cells and the production of
`autoantibodies and autoimmune disease. In patients with autoim-
`mune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) high
`levels of B cell—trophic factors such as B celliactivating factor of
`the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family (BAFF), also known as
`B-lymphocyte stimulator, can be found and suggest that B lympho—
`cytes participate in the autoimmune disease process. BAFF pro-
`vides survival signals to B cells and protects them from apoptosis
`by binding to 3 TNF receptor faintly members, B-ceil maturation
`antigen,
`transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and
`cyclophilin ligand interactor, and B—lymphocyte stimulator recep-
`tor 3 (BR3, also known as BAFF receptor). Overexpression of
`
`BAFF in mice leads to the development of autoimmune disease,g
`whereas neutralization of BAFF results in amelioration of autoim-
`mune pathology,10 Activated B lymphocytes secrete a variety of
`proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines,
`for example,
`interleukimo (IL—6),
`tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFHOL),
`interferon—gamma (IFN—y),
`IL—12, and macrophage migration
`inhibitory factor (MIF), which have been implicated in participat-
`ing in the inflammatory cascade of autoimmune pathology. In
`addition, antigen presentation by auloreactive B cells was found to
`be critical in several autoimmune disorders, for example, SLE or
`rheumatoid arthritis, and can promote autoimmune pathology
`independent of antibody productiorrr.“"3
`In contrast to their immunostimulatory characteristics, certain
`B-cell subsets can also exercise an immunomodulatory function.
`They maintain peripheral tolerance of CD4’r and CD8+ T cells by a
`variety of mechanisms, such as deletion}4 induction of anergy,15
`and cytokinevmediated suppression.16 For instance, antigen pre-
`sented by resting B cells leads to only partial activation of T cells
`and results in T—cell tolerance.17 Consistent with a tolerogenic role
`of B cells the immunologic response to tumor vaccination is
`enhanced in the absence of B cells.“2 How regulatory Bcells
`mediate suppression in not fully understood. The tolerogenic
`properties of resting B cells may be due to the low expression of
`costimulatory molecules. As outlined before, activation of B cells
`via CD40 generates antigen—presenting B cells with strong stimula-
`tory capacity. Stimulation with certain other Stimuli such as
`lipopolysaccharide or Staphylococcus cmreus Cowan I, on the other
`hand, renders B cells tolerogenic, despite inducing up-regulation of
`costimulalory molecules”19 Regulatory B cells induce tolerance
`not only by acting as tolerogenic APCs, but also by producing
`well-known immunomodulatory cytokines, foremost
`lL—lU and
`TGF—B, which can suppress T—cell responses.”-20
`In addition their direct effects on T and B cells have been
`
`shown to regulate the T-cell response indirectly by suppressing a
`broad range of other immune cells. They possess the ability to
`thwart T—cell responses by inhibiting DCsmr22 After vaccination
`DCs from B cell—deficient ptMT mice secrete higher amounts of
`IL—12 than DCs from wild—type mice. B lymphocytes can further-
`more attract regulatory T cells23 and have been shown to induce
`and expand marine and human regulatory Tcells in vitro.24'7‘5
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 8
`
`SAN EX 1003, Page 8
`
`

`

`BLOOD, 3 DECEMBER 2009 - VOLUME 114. NUMBER 24
`
`8 CELLS IN GVHD
`
`4921
`
`role for immunoregulatory B cells in preventing
`A functional
`autoimmune disease was
`first
`revealed in studies of murine
`
`experimental allergic encephalitis, an animal model for multiple
`sclerosis. In this model the inhibitory effect of B cells is dependent
`on IL-IO produced by a rare subpopulation of CDldhigh CD5+
`regulatory B cells.2627 The case of experimental allergic encephali-
`tis also exemplifies that B lymphocytes can exert opposing func-
`tions depending on the subset and phase of the disease course.
`Regulatory B cells protect against the development of experimental
`allergic encephalitis, whereas B—cell depletion after onset of
`disease ameliorates disease progression.27 A regulatory function of
`B cells has also been confirmed in animal models of rheumatoid
`arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease.20 Taken together, recent
`knowledge of B—eell biology has revealed that Bcetls possess
`considerable functional heterogeneity The type of Breell subsets
`involved,
`the nature, strength, and duration of the activation
`stimulus, as well as the temporospatial context determine
`whether B cells exert stimulatory or inhibitory effects on the
`immune system.
`The advent of B celialepleting monoclonal antibodies made it
`possible to study the importance ofB cells in human disease. Data
`from clinical
`trials of rituximab in patients with autoimmune
`diseases have provided important insights into the involvement of
`B cells in many aspects of the autoimmune reaction. Rituximah is a
`chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the B cell—specific
`cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20) antigen, a transmembrane
`protein expressed on pre—B lymphocytes, and immature and mature
`B cells but not on early B-eell precursors or plasma cells. It was
`initially developed as a treatment against B—cell
`lymphomas.
`Rituximab binds to CD20 on B lymphocytes and malignant
`lymphoma and causes cell destruction by a multifactorial mecha~
`nism including antibody-dependent cell—mediated cytotoxicity,
`complement-mediated cell lysis, and direct induction of apoptosis
`of target cells. Administration of rituximab leads to a rapid and
`selective depletion of B cells that lasts for several months. Because
`plasma cells do not express CD20, serum immunoglobulin levels
`are usually not affected by treatment with rituximab.
`Based on the experimental evidence for a pathogenic role of
`B cells in autoimmune disease and reports of improvement of
`autoimmune manifestations in lymphoma patients who were treated
`with rituximab, B—eell depletion has been investigated as a
`treatment for many autoimmune diseases. Interestingly,
`it has
`shown effectiveness even in autoimmune diseases that previously
`have been thought to be mainly T cell—mediated.” Meanwhile, due
`to its effectiveness rituximab has already been approved for the
`treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who do not respond
`to TNF blockade. The clinical benefit of rituximab in autoimmune
`
`disease generally correlates with the extent and duration of B—cell
`depletion. Individual clinical responses do not always correlate
`with changes in autoantihody serum levels, however. Treatment
`with rituxirnab not only depletes B cells but also down—regulates
`the expression ofimportant costimulatory molecules such as CD40
`and CD80. possibly leading to diminished Tueell activation.29
`Moreover, after rituximab treatment the number and suppressive
`function of regulatory T cells increases.30 In addition to short—term
`depletion of B lymphocytes rituximab also has beneficial long-term
`effects that persist even after recovery of the B—ccll compartment. It
`appears that rituximah reverses some of the disturbances of the
`peripheral B~cell pool and reconstitutes a normal B— and T—cell
`homeostasis in patients with autoimmune disease?”
`
`
`
`B~cell reconstitution kinetics after allogeneic
`HSCT
`
`After myeloablative allogeneic HSCT there is a long-lasting defect
`of cell-mediated immunity. A variety of factors such as the type and
`intensity of conditioning, stem cell source, drugs used for immuno-
`suppression, and occurrence of infection or GVHD influences the
`kinetics of immune recovery. B-cell reconstitution is generally
`slow and immunoglobulin levels are reduced after transplantation.
`In some patients immunoglobulin levels remain decreased for more
`than a year. Consequently, transplant recipients are at an increased
`risk of infection especially to encapsulated bacteria due to low
`levels of immunoglobulinA (IgA) and IgG2 and slower B-cell
`reconstitution is associated with higher infection rates.32 The
`reconstitution of B cells after transplantation seems to recapitulate
`B-cell ontogeny-1334 Early after transplantation there is a restricted
`B-cell repertoire, with limited BCR diversity that recovers only
`slowly.34 Furthermore, even despite quantitative normalization of
`the B—cell pool within the first year after transplantation, these
`B cells are functionally impaired.33 They exhibit a defect in the
`acquisition of somatic mutations and respond poorly to antigen,
`especially polysaccharide antigens.35
`Several factors affect the recovery of B cells after allogeneic
`stem cell transplantation. The B-cell repopulation is substantially
`influenced by the type of stem cells and the graft content.
`Peripheral blood stem cell grafts contain more B and T cells than
`bone marrow stem cell grafts. They have 3 to 18 times more B cells
`than bone marrow stem grafts resulting in a faster early B—cell
`recovery/.3537 Possibly due to stem cell mobilization with granulo—
`cyte colony-stimulating factor blood stem cell grafts also contain a
`higher propo

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket