throbber
~
`•
`atoo lea
`
`..,,--
`International Journal for Clinical and Investigative Dermatology
`
`181/1/90
`
`Comments
`
`Melagenina. An Analysis of Published and Other Available Data
`Nordlund, J.J.; Halder, R. (Cincinnati, Ohio/Washington, D.C.)
`. . . .. . .. .... . .. . .
`
`Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
`Idiopathic Recalcitrant Facial Flushing Syndrome
`Tur, E.; Ryatt, K.S.; Maibach, H.I. (San Francisco, Calif.)
`Malignant Melanoma at Sites of Therapeutic X-Irradiation
`McDonagh, A.J.G.; Wright, A.L. (Sheffield) . . ... . . . .
`Papillomavirus Common Antigen in Bowen's Disease
`
`. . .. .. . .... .. . . .. . . . . . . . .
`
`. . .. . .. . .. .. ..... . .
`
`18 9 0
`1 () nl ~~ Grussendorf-Concn, E.-I.; Giesen, M. (Aachen) . . . . . . . . .. . ..... . .. ... . . . . . . . . . ... .. . .
`.#
`£...
`/ ~~ ...
`.L t-~
`"
`
`/
`
`Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Psoriasis
`Takematsu, H.; Tagami, H. (Sendai) .. . . . . .. . ... . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. .. .. .
`Seasonal Modulation of Sebum Excretion
`--~--- Pierard-Franchimont, C.; Pitrard, G.E.; Kligman, A. (Liege/Philadelphia, Pa.)
`~~~~~;';;"~~'ta~Vapour Loss Threshold and Induction of Cholinergic Urticaria
`"r, R.A. ; Doegias, H.'M.G. (Groningen)
`.. . .. ... .. .
`. . . .. .
`
`.. .. . ... . . .. . . .. .
`
`. . . . . . . . . . • . .... . .. .
`
`r
`and Treatment
`() 1 '~ica Ke . onaz~le f~r Infantile ~ebo~rhoe~c Der~atitis .
`j U \.. t.l
`, Legralll, V., Palmier, c., Lejcan, S., SIX, M., Malevllle,J . (Bordeaux) .. . .. .. . ... . . ... .
`Tal b,
`Fuma c
`id Therapy in Psoriasis: A Double-Blind Comparison betw~en Fumaric Acid Compound
`er y and Monotherapy with Dimethylfumaric Acid Ester
`ie cr, c.; Hoop, D. dc; Langcndijk, P.N.J.; Loenen, A.C. van; Gubbels, J. (Amsterdam/Ede-Bennekom/Grave)
`:~FIl[fg;rBlanching after Epicutaneous Application of EM LA Cream. A Double-Blind Randomized Study
`among 50 Healthy Volunteers
`Villada, G.; Zetlaoui, J.; Revuz, J. (CreteH) .. . ... •. . .. . . . . . . . .. .•.. . .. . •. . ....• .
`
`5
`
`8
`
`11
`
`16
`
`21
`
`23
`
`26
`
`33
`
`38
`
`41
`
`44
`
`48
`
`51
`
`54
`
`56
`
`Case Reports
`Urticaria with Macroglobulinaemia. Disease Activity Associate Alterations in Immunoglobulins Profile
`and Bone Marrow Hypodiploidy
`Bonnetblanc, J.M. ; Drouet, M.; Laplaud, P.; Bedane, c.; Bernard, P. (Limoges) . .. . ... . . . .. . .. ... .
`Intractable Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita: Efficacy ofCiclosporin A
`Merle, c.; Blanc, D.; ZuItak, M.; Landuyt, H. van; Drobacheff, c.; Laurent, R. (Besan~on) .. . .... . . . .. .
`Familial Pemphigus vulgaris
`Katzenelson (Weissman), Y.; David, M.; Zamir, R.; MeJlibovsky, J.; Idises, c.; Sandbank, M. (Pctah Tiqva/
`Tel Aviv)
`... .... . . . ... . . .. . .. . ..... . . . ..... ... .... .. .. . . . . .. ... .. .
`Psoriasis Related to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
`Wolf, R.; Tamir, A.; Brenner, S. (Tel Aviv)
`.. .. ... . . . ..... ... . . ... . .. . . .. .. . .. . ... .
`Subcutaneous Fat Necrosis with Thrombocytopenia in a Newborn Infant
`Wolach, B.; Raas-Rothschild, A.; Vogel, R.; Choc, L.; Metzker, A. (Kfar Saba/Petah Tiqva/Tel Aviv)
`Leg Ulcers in a Patient with Spherocytosis: A Clinicopathological Report
`Vanscheidt, W.; Leder, 0.; Vanscheidt, E.; Wokalek, H. ; Wilmer, J.; Hofmann, E.; Schopf, E. (Freiburg i.Br.) . . .
`
`. . .. .. .
`
`KAR.GER.
`
`(Continued on back cover)
`
`S. Karger
`Medical and Scientific
`Publishers
`Basel · Munchen
`Paris· London
`New York . New Delhi
`Bangkok· Singapore
`Tokyo· Sydney
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1017, p. 001
`
`

`

`Derm atologica 1990;18 1 :33- 37
`
`© 1<)<)0 Karge r AG. Basel
`OO II - <)0751<)OIlRI I--D033 $2.75/0
`
`Fumaric Acid Therapy in Psoriasis: A Double-Blind
`Comparison between Fumaric Acid Compound Therapy and
`Monotherapy with Dimethylfumaric Acid Esterl
`, A. C. van Loenen", 1. Gubbels d
`C. Nieboer a, D. de HOOpb, P. N.J. LangendijkC
`"Depa rtm e nt of De rmato logy, Free Uni versity Hospital , Amsterd am; bGelderse Va llei Hospital , Ede-Bennekom; ' Department of
`Pharmacy , Free Unive rsity Hospital, A msterda m , a nd "Organizatio n fo r Resea rch and Management , G rave , The Netherl ands
`
`Key Words. Psoriasis· Oimethylfumaric acid ester' Monoethylfumaric acid ester· Fumaric acid therapy
`
`Abstract. In a 4- month double-blind study the effects of dim ethylfumaric acid esters (DMFAE-EC) and DMFAE
`plus salts of monoethylfum aric acid esters (fum aric acid combination, FAC-EC) in enteric-coated tablets were com(cid:173)
`pared in 22 respectively 23 patients with psoriasis. In both groups about 50% showed a co nsiderable improvement , i.e.
`the initial score was more than halved. The therapeutic effects showed no significant differences in both groups with
`respect to the total psoriasis score or the different parameters. In the FAC-EC group the effects were obtained mo re
`rapid ly. Most frequently observed side effects in both groups were flushings, stomachache and diarrhea . Due to these
`co mpl ai nts 3 respectively 8 patie nts discontinued therapy. Eosinophilia , leukopenia and lymphopenia were the most
`freq uently observed differe nces in lab tests. It was concluded that FAC-EC had no significantly better effect than
`monotherapy with OMFAE-EC. Moreover, enteric coating of the tablets did not prevent stomach complaints. Until
`more information has been obtained about the pharmacokinetics, the toxicity and optimal composition of the drug , the
`fumaric acid therapy in pso riasis should be seen as experimental.
`
`The fumaric acid (FA) the rapy is a new syste mic medi (cid:173)
`cation with FA derivatives that has gai ned an increasing
`popularity amo ng psoriasis patients in several countries in
`western E urope .
`Several doubl e-blind studies have indeed shown that
`dimeth ylfumaric acid ester (OMFAE) and salts from
`mo noet hylfumaric acid
`(MEFAE) combined with
`DMFAE [2] have a positive therapeutic effect on pso(cid:173)
`riasis [t , 2]. The same studies showed that OMFAE was
`clea rly more effective than the Na salt of MEFAE, which
`only produced some effect when given in higher dosages
`[1].
`The mechanism of the effects of these substances is
`unknown . The view, originally held by Schweckendiek
`[3], was that these substa nces influenced the citric acid
`
`Suppo rted by a grant from the Stichting GelO ndh eidslOrg-onder(cid:173)
`lOek Ijsselmo nd , Zwolle, The Ne the rl ands.
`
`cycle . This could not be confirm ed by us in a number of
`unpublished experiments with both isolated mitochondria
`and hepatocytes . It is a known fact, however, that
`MEFAE and OMFAE [unpubl. observatio n] inhibit the
`mitosis of PHA-stimulated lymphocytes [4] and epithelial
`cell lines [5] . Little is known about the pharmacokinetics
`of the FA derivatives.
`Both DMFAE and MEFAE salts form the active
`ingredients of enteric coated (EC) tablets that are usually
`prescribed in FA therapy . This combination seemed to be
`based on historical factors rather than a ratio nal ther(cid:173)
`apeutic approach. The question arose whether this com(cid:173)
`bination was not too complicated and monoth erapy was
`just as effective. T he aim of our study was therefore to
`assess the therapeutic efficiency of DMFAE monother(cid:173)
`apy compared to that of DMFAE combined with
`MEFAE salts using the same DMFAE dosage and dosage
`form (EC tablets) .
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1017, p. 002
`
`

`

`34
`
`Nie boL! r/dc Hoop/ Lan gc ndijk/v<l n LOL! nc n/Gubbe ls
`
`Table I. Co mparati vcs rud yon th ceffectsofDMFAE-EC(n = 22)
`a nd FAC-EC (n = 23) o n 45 psoriasis patie nts
`
`Medication
`
`n
`
`Improve me nt
`
`Dete r(cid:173)
`io rat io n
`
`Disco n(cid:173)
`tinu at ion
`
`< 25% 25-50% > 50%
`
`DMFA E-EC 22
`FAC-EC
`23
`
`5(22) 3 ( 14)
`1 (4) 2 (9)
`
`10 (45)
`12 (52)
`
`o
`o
`
`4( 18)1
`8 (35)"
`
`Figures in pa re nthescs a rc pe rcc nt ages .
`Do 'agc DMFAE-EC: 120-480 mg/day.
`Dosagc FAC-EC: 1-4tablc ts/d ay .
`A ll discontinued beca usc o f side e ffec ts.
`Discon tinucd beca usc of side effects, I for othe r reasons .
`
`Material and Methods
`
`Medicotiol/
`T he two diffe re nt drugs for thi s study wc rc suppli ed in EC tab lc ts
`whi ch we re i ndistinguishab lc in sizc , fo rm a nd color . The mo noth e rapy
`tah le ts (DMFAE-EC) co nta in ed DMFA E , 120 mg pc r tab lc t. T he
`co m hi na ti o n the rapy tab le ts (FAC-EC) co nta in cd a n equivalent
`a mo unt o f 120 mg DMFA and an additi o nal a mo unt of 5 mg ma gnc(cid:173)
`sium-MEFA,3 mg zin c-MErA and 87 mg calcium -M EFA. Th e la tt l! r
`co mbin a ti o n is used mos t frcque nt ly in FA th c rapy. Th c two batchcs uf
`DMrA E-EC and FAC-EC wc rc produccd by the Kc the l Pharmacy ,
`Schi cdam , Th e Net he rlands. Q ua lit y co ntrol o n bo th batchcs was d o nL!
`at th e pha rm acy labo rato ry, Free U ni vcrs it y, A mstc rd a m , The Ne thc r(cid:173)
`lands. T hc qu ality co ntrol co nsistcd o f idc ntification (o n DMFAE fo r
`DMFA-EC and DMFA E , MEFAE , magnesi um , zin c a nd calciu m for
`FAC-EC) . qualltitati o n o f co llte nt s (hetwee n 95 a nd 105% o f th e
`declared amount) by hi gh-pe rforma nce
`liquid chro ma togra )h
`(DMFA E co nte nt for DMFAE-EC a nd DMFAE - ,lI1d total MEFIA~
`co nte nt for FA C-EC) and co ntro l o n e nte ric coatin g acco rdin g to th e
`US P XX I 101. Bot h ba tchcs passL!d thc tes ts in t he quality co nt ro l.
`
`PI/tiel/ts
`Beforc e llt e ring the study patie nt s we re in for med ve rball y and gavc
`tlu; ir co nsc nt. Random ization int o two g ro ups was made bctwccn 45
`patic nts , 25 fe mal c , 20 ma lc, aged hc twec n 18 and 70 years: 22 we re
`t rcatcd with DMFAE-EC , 23 with rAC-Ec. At the c nd ofthcstudy:l:l
`pa ti c ntsco uld becva luatcd , 18 had bcc n trcated with DMFA E-EC a nd
`15 with FAC-EC. At Icas t 10'1.. of the body surface was affected. A t th e
`beginnin g o f th e stud y 22 o f th cSL! 33 pati e nt s showcd th e plaqu l! type,
`10 th e macu lar typc and I th c g uttat e type o f pso ria sis . II patie nts had
`joint co mplaint s , 6 in th c DMFA E-E g ro up and :) in th c FA C-EC
`gJ"LlUp. Th l! stud y was pc rfo rm cd undc r a protoco l app roved by th e hos(cid:173)
`pita l's E th ical Co mmittcl!.
`
`Dosl/ge
`T he starting dosage wa s I tabl e t a day . Thi s was increased wec kl y
`up to a max imum of 4 tablet s a d ay ha nd ed out in 2 ad mini stra tion s. 6
`patic nts o fth e DMFAE-ECgroup and4 pati e nts o fth e FA C-EC gro up
`did not tolerate thi s dosagc . T hey we re trea ted with I tablc t twice a da y.
`
`Eva/uatioll
`A sim plifi ed 'pso ri asis a re a a nd seve rit y score' was appli cd , in
`whi ch 5 para me te rs wc re eva luatL!d : Exte nt: 0 = c ntirdy cl ea n,
`../ = 35-
`1=< 10% hod y surface affectc d. 2 = 10- 25%. :l=25-35°!t"
`SO% , 5 => 50% bo dy surfacc affeClL!d : sca lin g : O= no ne , l = sli ght ,
`2 = mod e rate, 3 = scve re, spo ntan eo us; t hi ck ness o f pa tehes: 0 = 110
`infiltrati o n, I = sli ght infil tration , 2 = appa rc nt infi ltra ti o n , nol ra iscd,
`3 = ra iscd; rcd ness: O= no ne , I = pin k . 2 = brig ht rcd , 3 = fi c ry red or
`red-purple ; itching: 0 = non c , I = slight . 2 = mo dc ratc , 3 = st ro ng. The
`max illlumtotal score was 17 . thL! minimum O. ThL! paticnts werc exa m(cid:173)
`in ed cve ry 4 wec ks a nd th c psoriasis sco re as wc ll as th e sidc c ffects
`WL!rc rcg istl!red .
`Apa rt from thi s scm L! a gc nL! ral eva lu ation was g ive n at till! c nd o f
`thc cx aminat io n by thc invest iga tor and the pa ti e nt (d c te ri oratcd , no
`cha nge , sli ght improvc me nt . strong imp rovc mL! nt , full clea ra ncL!). The
`effcct o n join t complaillls was judged o n t hL! basis o f thc impress io ns of
`th L! pati e nts: de te ri o ra ted , un c ha nged ,
`imp roved , co nsidc ra bl y
`im proved.
`Dur ing cach visit thc fo ll ow ing laho ratory tes ts werc carried out:
`blood : pe riph e ra l Ic ukocytcs plus diffc rc ntia l co unt : serulll : BU N,
`alka li ne phos phmasc , LD H , ALAT, ASAT, y-GT: u rinc: prote in and
`scdim c nt.
`T hc study was ca rri ed o ut in the mo nth s fr o lll Ocrobc r to A pril , rhe
`duratio n of thc st ud y was 4 mo nth s pc r pati e nt. Statisti ca l analysis was
`ca rri L!d o ut using Fische r's exact tes t a nd th c X1 test.
`
`Results and Side Effects
`
`T he individual res ults a re shown in table 1. Compared
`to the initial population sco re, a co nside rable improve(cid:173)
`me nt (i. e . score more tha n halved) was obse rved in 45 %
`of the patie nts treated with DM FAE-EC and in 52% of
`the trea ted with FAC-EC. This improveme nt was stat is(cid:173)
`ti ca ll y significant.
`I n both gro ups 4 patie nts ( 18 and 15%) showed a full
`clea rance . Co nside rable improveme nt occurred in 15 o ut
`01'22 (68%) patie nts with th e plaque type a nd in 40 ut of 10
`(40%) of those with the macul ar type. The patient with
`the guttate type showed a full clea ra nce afte r a treatm e nt
`of 2 months wit h FAC-EC, but had a n ex te nsive relapse 1
`mo nth late r eve n th ough the th erapy had bee n continued.
`For 5 patie nts (22% ) in th e DMFA E-EC group a nd 1
`patie nt (4% ) in th e FAC-EC gro up the psoriasis did not
`show a ny reaction to the thera py. T he observed differ(cid:173)
`ences betwee n the two gro ups appea red to be not signifi(cid:173)
`ca nt. Dete rioration , th at is a n increase of the score up to
`more tha n 125% , was no t obse rved in e ithe r of the
`groups.
`T he course of the score in both groups with rega rd to
`the total ave rage score a nd the se pa rate parame te rs is
`shown in fi gure l a, b. It covers the observat io ns of those
`pat ie nts who could be evaluated afte r 4 months: 18 in the
`DMFAE-EC gro up and 15 in the FAC-EC group . The
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1017, p. 003
`
`

`

`Fumaric Acid The rapy in Psori asis
`
`35
`
`15
`
`o
`lfl
`
`• = DMFA -EC
`A = FAC- EC
`
`Fig. 1. Course of the total psoriasis score andoft he5 parameters in
`patients treated with DMFAE- EC (n = 18) or FAC-EC (n = 15) during
`4 months. a Tota l psoriasis severity score. b Perce nt decrease of the 5
`parameters of the severity score.
`
`'iil
`;Q 5 - ' - - - , , - - - - , - - - - - , - - _ , -_ _ - , _ a
`v
`III
`IV
`Time (28 days) I.
`
`% Extent of' eruption
`100
`
`Induration
`
`Scaling
`
`Redness
`
`Itching
`
`50
`
`III
`
`IV
`
`V
`
`III
`
`IV
`
`V
`
`III
`
`IV
`
`V
`
`III
`
`IV
`
`V
`
`4-- , ---,- - , - - , - h
`III
`IV
`V
`
`Time (Ze days) 4
`
`tota l average sco re in the DMFAE-EC group dropped
`from 9.7 to 4.1 and in the FAC-EC group from 10.5 to 4.1.
`The course of this score in both treatment groups was not
`significa ntly different at any time point (I-V). Subse(cid:173)
`quently the separate parameters too did not show a sig(cid:173)
`nificant difference in time course. The results after 4
`mo nths were not statistically different.
`The jo int compl aints of the 6 patie nts in the DMFAE(cid:173)
`EC group showed considerable improvement for 2
`patients, and some for 1, and deteriorated or remained
`unchanged for the other 3. In th e 5 patients in the FAC(cid:173)
`EC gro up a considerable improvement occurred in 2 cases
`and a slight improvement in 3 cases.
`T he ge neral evaluation of the therapy by the patients
`usually corresponded with that of the investigators.
`T he subjective and objective side effects are shown in
`tab le 2. The flushings sta rted 3-4 h after the tablets were
`taken. They invo lved a feeling of tingling heat, accompa(cid:173)
`nied by diffuse redness, which continued for about half an
`
`hour mainly localized in the face, anns and the upper part
`of the body . This symptom was not constantly present and
`in the course of the treatment its frequency decreased.
`One patient was troubled by this sy mptom to such an
`extent that he discontinued the treatment . The gastroin(cid:173)
`testinal complaints, on the other hand , presented a real
`problem. More than half the patients were troubled by
`serious stomach complaints, invo lving gastralgia, but also
`nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. For 14% (n =3) of the
`patients in the DMFAE-ECgroup and 30% (n = 7) in the
`FAC-EC gro up these complaints were a reason to discon(cid:173)
`tinue the therapy. Another patient had to discontinue th e
`DMFA E-EC therapy beca use his tablets had been stolen.
`The abnormalities which were registered in the blood
`most generally were: leukopenia «3.0 X 109/1) , lympho(cid:173)
`penia « 15%) and eosinophilia (> 5%) . The former two
`developed in the course of the 3rd and 4th months. The
`eosinophilia usually began in the first 2 months and disap(cid:173)
`peared spontaneously in most of the cases.
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1017, p. 004
`
`

`

`36
`
`Nie boe r/de Hoop/Lange ndij k/van Loe ne n/G ubbels
`
`TlIble 2. Side e ffects during tre atme nt of psori asis wit h DMFAE
`(n = 22) o r FAC -EC (n = 23) ove r a pe ri od of 4 mo nths
`
`DMFAE-EC
`
`FAC-EC
`
`(n =22)
`
`n
`
`o
`
`3
`3
`8
`
`o
`1
`o
`
`%
`
`86
`55
`50
`9
`5
`5
`
`o
`
`14
`12
`35
`
`o
`5
`o
`
`(n = 23)
`
`n
`
`%
`
`20 1
`143
`l43
`1
`0
`
`2
`
`3
`2
`3
`
`0
`0
`
`87
`6 l
`6 l
`4
`0
`4
`
`9
`
`13
`8
`13
`
`0
`0
`4
`
`Sy mpto ms
`Flushing
`Diarrhea
`Nausea/stomache
`Ge ne ral ma laise
`Dizziness
`H eadach e
`La boratory
`Urine
`Albuminuria
`Blooel
`Le ukope ni a
`Lymphope nia
`Eos ino phili a
`I ncrease o f
`C reatinine/urea
`A lkaline phosphatase
`ASAT/ALAT
`
`I Patient discontinue d the treatm e nt as a result o f thi s symptom .
`3 Patie nts disco ntinu ed th e trea tm e nt as a res ult of these symptoms .
`7 Patie nts d iscontinue d th e tre atme nt as a result of these symptoms .
`
`DisclIssion
`
`In this study th e treatment of psoriasis with FA esters
`led to evident improve ment in about 50% in the pati e nts .
`This percentage was even highe r when one did not consid(cid:173)
`e r the initial study population, but only those patients who
`could be evaluated after 4 months. In that calculation the
`improvement percentage (i. e. a psoriasis seve rity sco re
`morc th a n halved) was 55% in the DMFAE-EC group
`and 80% in the FAC-EC group . The course of the total
`score and of the separate parameters during the 4 months
`of the study showed a te ndency towards a more rapid
`res ult with FAC-EC than with DMFAE-EC monother(cid:173)
`apy. Howeve r, this diffcrence was not significant and the
`final score in both groups was the sa me .
`Of th e side effects the freque ntly occurring gastroin(cid:173)
`testinal sy mptoms should be mentioned first. Fairly often
`the diarrhea , frequ e ntly accompa nied by stomachaches,
`form ed th e main reason to discontinue the therapy . In a
`numbe r of cases these side effects disappeared sponta-
`
`neously in due course, for other patie nts loperamide
`resolved this complaint. Some patie nts had predom(cid:173)
`inantly serious gastric complai nts, despite the use of Ee
`tablets. In a numbc r of cases Antage l (Solutio Antacida ,
`Dutch Pharmacist Formulary) could preve nt stomach
`complaints. Another way to preve nt these complaints is
`lowering of the starting dosage to 30 or 60 mg D MFA with
`subsequent weekly increases. The gastric complaints
`must be taken seriously as we obse rved aggravation of
`ulcera ventricu li and eve n once a perforation of th e stom(cid:173)
`ach during treatme nt with noncoated capsules with
`DMFA E.
`The experience of th e f1u shings was less serious , flush(cid:173)
`ing did not occur each time the drug was take n and it often
`decreased in the course of the study. Genera l malaise
`(without complaints of the digestive tract) was experi(cid:173)
`enced by several patie nts, but was take n for granted
`.
`because of the positive the rape utic results .
`The most striking differe nces in lab tests were thos.e 111
`the blood count: le ukope nia , lymphopenia and eoslOO
`-
`philia . The latter mainly occurred in the first 2 months and
`usually disappeared sponta neously . [t did not inv~lve
`allergic symptoms, neith e r of the skin nor of the respIra(cid:173)
`tory tract. The leukope nia was in most cases the result of a
`considerable decrease of the lymphocytes. It is a well
`known fact that MEF AE inhibits the prolife ration of
`PHA-stimulated lymphocytes among other things. We
`noticed that DMF AE had the sa me effect. It was re mark(cid:173)
`able that th e lymphopenia in this study occurred far less
`freque ntly than in an earlie r study , in which more tha~)
`50% of the patients showed this phenome non [1]. In thiS
`ea rlier study , instead of the EC tablets, capsules fill ed
`with a coated granulate were used , which already re leased
`DMFA E in the stomach. It was demonstrated there that
`the lymphopenia was caused by a selective decrease of T
`suppressor (Ts) lymphocytes a nd , less ex plicitly , of the I~
`lymphocytes, whereas the number of T he lper ce s
`re mained constant. An explanation for these phe nomena
`could be that the Ts and B lymphocytes are a popl~l~t~on
`of cells with a rapid proliferation of which the cell diVISion
`is inhibited by relatively high serum levels of DMF~E
`after prompt resorption due to prepyloric re lease . So far
`th e lymphopenia has disappea red in all patie nts in the
`course of 2-4 months after discontinuation of the th e rapy .
`In 2 patie nts of the FAC-EC group, albuminuria
`occurred which was not accompanied by a rise of the
`serum creatinine and urea. One should , howe ver , not rule
`out the possibility of serious nephrotoxicity. Acute tubu(cid:173)
`lus necrosis has bee n re ported in 4 patients and could very
`probably be ascribed to FA th e rapy [7J .
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1017, p. 005
`
`

`

`Fum aric Acid T he ra py in Pso ri as is
`
`37
`
`In summ a ry o ne could state that treatme nt of pso riasis
`with FAC-EC does not res ult in a bette r the rape utic res ult
`compared to DM FAE-EC monotherapy. EC of the
`tablets does not preve nt the freque nt occurre nce of gas(cid:173)
`tric complaints. rn the light of a numbe r of serio us and rel(cid:173)
`atively freque ntly occurring side effects th e FA the rapy is
`to be seen as expe rim e ntal until the re is more inform atio n
`abo ut th e pha rm aco kinetics, toxicity a nd optim al compo(cid:173)
`sition of the drug.
`
`References
`
`4 Pe tres J , Ka lho ff BW, Ki efe r G , et a l: Ocr Ei nfiuss vo n Fum arsii ure
`Mo noa th yleste r a uf di e Nuci einsa ure unci Prote insy nthese PH A
`stimuli e rte r me nschli che r Lymp hocyte n. Arch Dermatol Res 1975:
`254:67-73.
`5 SchroeffJ G van de r , O udh orn C , Nligte re n-HlI ying WM , Ponec M:
`Inhibi to ry effects of fumari c acid derivatives o n cell pro li feratio n
`a ncl diffe re ntiation. J In vest D erm atol 1989;92 :537 A .
`6 United Stat es Pharmacope ia , ed 2 1. Monograp hs 711 a nd 725.
`Rockville , U ni ted States Pha nn acope ial Conve nti o n , 1984 , pp
`1243- 1244 , 1245-1246.
`7 Rood nat, 11 , C hristi aa ns MHL, Nugte re n-Huying W M , SchrodT
`JG van der , Zo uwe n P va n der , Stri cke r BH C , Wee ning JJ , C ha ng
`PC: Ak ute Ni e re ninsuffizie nz bei de r Be handlung der Pso ri as is mit
`Flim arsU ure-Es te rn . Schwe iz Mcd Woche nschr 1989 ; 11 9: 826- 830 .
`
`N ieboe r C, I-loop 0 de, Loc ne n A C va n , La nge ndij k PNJ , Dij k E
`va n: Syste mi c thcrapy w ith fum a ri c acid der ivativcs : New possibili(cid:173)
`ti es in the tre a tm e nt o f pso ri asi s. J A m Acad De rm atol 1989;
`20:601 - 608 .
`2 Nugte re n- Hu ying W M , Schroeff JG va n cle r: Fum aa rzu uthe ra pi e
`voor pso ri as is. 235 th Ge n Mee t D utch Ve re ni ging De rm a tol Ve ne(cid:173)
`reo l, Le iden , 1989 , pp 6 1-62 .
`3 Schwee ke ndi e k W : D ie Psoriasis vul gari s. e ine stolTwechselbe(cid:173)
`d ingte H a ut kra nkhe it. Erfa hrungs he il k unde 1984;33 :850- 858.
`
`Received : A ugust 4 , 1989
`Accepted : Nove mbe r 17 , 1989
`
`Dr. C. Nie boe r
`De partm c nt of D e rma tology
`Aca de mi c Hospital Free Uni ve rsity
`De Boele laa n 111 7
`N L- 108 l A mste rda m , HV (The Ne the rl a nds)
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1017, p. 006
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket