throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SNAP INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`BLACKBERRY LIMITED
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 8,825,084
`
`and
`
`Patent No. 8,326,327
`
`DEPOSITION OF
`
`SAMRAT BHATTACHARJEE, PH.D.
`
`875 15TH STREET, NORTHWEST, SUITE 10
`
`WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005
`
`NOVEMBER 18, 2019
`
`JOB NO. 19-85326
`
`Reported by: Cindy L. Sebo, RMR, CRR, RPR, CSR,
`
`CCR, CLR, RSA, LiveDeposition Authorized Reporter
`
`S THE SULLIVAN GROUP
`
`OF COURT REPORTERS
`SULLIVANCOURTREPORTERS.COM
`
`PHCNJE853523386O |3239388750
`
`1
`
`BLACKBERRY 2004
`SNAP, INC. V. BLACKBERRY LIMITED
`|PR2019-00715
`
`1
`
`BLACKBERRY 2004
`SNAP, INC. V. BLACKBERRY LIMITED
`IPR2019-00715
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · · · _________________
`
`·3· · · · · ·BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · · · _________________
`
`·5· · · · · · · · · · · · · SNAP INC.,
`
`·6· · · · · · · · · · · · · Petitioner
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · v.
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · · · BLACKBERRY LIMITED
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · · · · ·Patent Owner
`
`10· · · · · · · · · · · _________________
`
`11· · · · · · · · · · ·Patent No. 8,825,084
`
`12· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·and
`
`13· · · · · · · · · · ·Patent No. 8,326,327
`
`14· · · · · · · · · · · _________________
`
`15· · · · · · · · · · · · DEPOSITION OF
`
`16· · · · · · · · ·SAMRAT BHATTACHARJEE, PH.D.
`
`17· · · · · · ·875 15TH STREET, NORTHWEST, SUITE 10
`
`18· · · · · · · · · · WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005
`
`19· · · · · · · · · · · NOVEMBER 18, 2019
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23· ·Reported by:· Cindy L. Sebo, RMR, CRR, RPR, CSR,
`
`24· ·CCR, CLR, RSA, LiveDeposition Authorized Reporter
`
`25· ·JOB NO. 19-85326
`
`2
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · · · · A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`·2
`
`·3· ·COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER:
`
`·4· ·BY - DAVID OKANO, ESQ.
`
`·5· ·PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`
`·6· ·1117 S. California Avenue
`
`·7· ·Palo Alto, California 94304
`
`·8· ·davidokano@paulhastings.com
`
`·9
`
`10· ·COUNSEL FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`11· ·BY - NICHOLAS STEPHENS, ESQ.
`
`12· ·FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`13· ·3200 RBC Plaza
`
`14· ·60 South Sixth Street
`
`15· ·Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
`
`16· ·nstephens@fr.com
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`3
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · · · · · · · · INDEX
`
`·2
`
`·3· ·SAMRAT BHATTACHARJEE, PH.D.
`
`·4· · · ·BY MR. STEPHENS· · · · · · · · · · · · ·4, 105
`
`·5· · · ·BY MR. OKANO· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·102
`
`·6
`
`·7
`
`·8
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`4
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · · · ·P R O C E E D I N G S
`
`·2
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · · · Washington, D.C.
`
`·4· · · · · · · · November 18, 2019; 9:17 a.m.
`
`·5
`
`·6· · · · · · · · · · · · · -· - -
`
`·7· · · · · · · · SAMRAT BHATTACHARJEE, PH.D.,
`
`·8· · · · · after having been first duly sworn, was
`
`·9· · · · · · ·examined and testified as follows:
`
`10· · · · · · · · · · · · · -· - -
`
`11· · · · · · · · · · · · · -· - -
`
`12· · · · · EXAMINATION BY COUNSEL FOR PATENT OWNER
`
`13· · · · · · · · · · · · · -· - -
`
`14· ·BY MR. STEPHENS:
`
`15· · · · ·Q.· · Thank you for being here today.
`
`16· · · · · · · ·To start, I'd like to recognize that
`
`17· ·our conversation today is being transcribed by
`
`18· ·the court reporter.· And to make her job easier,
`
`19· ·please ensure that we don't talk over each other.
`
`20· · · · · · · ·So I'll ask a question, give you an
`
`21· ·opportunity to respond.· And once you've
`
`22· ·completed, we'll -- I'll go on with the
`
`23· ·questioning.
`
`24· · · · · · · ·Does that make sense?
`
`25· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`5
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.· And just to stipulate, this
`
`·2· ·single deposition will be applicable to both IPR
`
`·3· ·2019/00714 pertaining to U.S. Patent 8,825,048,
`
`·4· ·and IPR 2019/0071- -- -15 pertaining to
`
`·5· ·U.S. Patent 8,326,327.
`
`·6· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`·7· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`·8· · · · · · · ·MR. OKANO:· Counsel for Petitioner,
`
`·9· · · · Snap Inc., agrees with that stipulation.
`
`10· · · · · · · ·MR. STEPHENS:· Thank you.
`
`11· ·BY MR. STEPHENS:
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · Can you please state your full name?
`
`13· · · · ·A.· · Samrat Bhattacharjee.
`
`14· · · · ·Q.· · And in which city and state do you
`
`15· ·reside?
`
`16· · · · ·A.· · Silver Spring, Maryland.
`
`17· · · · ·Q.· · Where do you currently work?
`
`18· · · · ·A.· · University of Maryland.
`
`19· · · · ·Q.· · Do you understand that you are under
`
`20· ·oath?
`
`21· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`22· · · · ·Q.· · Is there any reason that you cannot
`
`23· ·give truthful and accurate testimony today?
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · No.
`
`25· · · · ·Q.· · To ensure clarity, I will define
`
`6
`
`

`

`·1· ·several terms that I'll use throughout the
`
`·2· ·deposition.
`
`·3· · · · · · · ·When I use the terms "patent owner"
`
`·4· ·or "BlackBerry," I'm referring to
`
`·5· ·BlackBerry Limited.
`
`·6· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`·7· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`·8· · · · ·Q.· · When I use the terms "Petitioner" or
`
`·9· ·"Snap," I'm referring to Snap Inc.
`
`10· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`11· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · When I use the term "'084 patent,"
`
`13· ·I'm referring to U.S. Patent Number 8,825,084.
`
`14· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`16· · · · ·Q.· · When I use the term "'327 patent,"
`
`17· ·I'm referring to U.S. Patent 8,326,327.
`
`18· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`19· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`20· · · · ·Q.· · When I use the terms "'084 IPR" or
`
`21· ·"'084 proceeding," I'm referring to IPR
`
`22· ·2019/00714.
`
`23· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`25· · · · ·Q.· · When I use the terms "'327 IPR" or
`
`7
`
`

`

`·1· ·"'327 proceeding," I'm referring to IPR
`
`·2· ·2019/00715.
`
`·3· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`·4· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`·5· · · · ·Q.· · When I refer to the "'084 patent,"
`
`·6· ·I'm referring to Snap's IPR petition submitted in
`
`·7· ·IPR 2019/00714.
`
`·8· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`·9· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`10· · · · ·Q.· · When I refer to the "'327 petition,"
`
`11· ·I'm referring to Snap's IPR petition submitted in
`
`12· ·IPR 2019/00715.
`
`13· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`14· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`15· · · · ·Q.· · When I use the term "Winkler," I am
`
`16· ·referring to U.S. Patent 8,750,906, which has
`
`17· ·been marked Exhibit 1004 in both the '084 IPR and
`
`18· ·the '327 IPR.
`
`19· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`20· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`21· · · · ·Q.· · When I use the term "Lemmela," I'm
`
`22· ·referring to U.S. Patent Publication
`
`23· ·2008/0250337, marked Exhibit 1005 in both the
`
`24· ·'084 IPR and the '327 IPR.
`
`25· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`8
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`·2· · · · ·Q.· · When I use the term "Waldman," I am
`
`·3· ·referring to U.S. Patent publication
`
`·4· ·2011/0199479, marked Exhibit 10011 in IPR
`
`·5· ·2019/00715.
`
`·6· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`·7· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`·8· · · · ·Q.· · When I refer to the "'084
`
`·9· ·declaration" or "your '084 declaration," I'm
`
`10· ·referring to your declaration that was submitted
`
`11· ·as Exhibit 1002 in the '084 IPR.
`
`12· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`13· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`14· · · · ·Q.· · When I refer to the "'327
`
`15· ·declaration" or "your '327 declaration," I'm
`
`16· ·referring to your declaration that was submitted
`
`17· ·as Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2019/00715.
`
`18· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`19· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`20· · · · ·Q.· · And when I use the term "POSITA," I'm
`
`21· ·referring to an acronym for a person of ordinary
`
`22· ·skill in the art at the time of the alleged
`
`23· ·invention.
`
`24· · · · · · · ·Do you understand?
`
`25· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`9
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·Q.· · Thank you.
`
`·2· · · · · · · ·Okay.· Can you please describe how
`
`·3· ·you prepared for today's deposition?
`
`·4· · · · ·A.· · I looked at a lot of documents,
`
`·5· ·including all of the documents that we have just
`
`·6· ·provided acronyms for; I looked at, also, the
`
`·7· ·declarations of Dr. McDaniel; I looked at
`
`·8· ·the patent owner's response in both of the IPRs;
`
`·9· ·I looked at the institution decisions; then, of
`
`10· ·course, I looked at the references, and so on.
`
`11· ·And I met with counsel.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.· Beyond any file exhibits that
`
`13· ·have been submitted in the proceeding thus far,
`
`14· ·did you refer to any additional material?
`
`15· · · · · · · ·MR. OKANO:· And -- and,
`
`16· · · · Dr. Bhattacharjee, I just caution you not
`
`17· · · · to reveal the substance of any privileged
`
`18· · · · communication with your attorneys.
`
`19· · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I -- I mean, I looked
`
`20· · · · at all of the relevant documents, as I
`
`21· · · · said.
`
`22· ·BY MR. STEPHENS:
`
`23· · · · ·Q.· · Approximately how much time did you
`
`24· ·spend preparing for today's deposition?
`
`25· · · · ·A.· · You know --
`
`10
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · ·MR. OKANO:· I'm --
`
`·2· · · · Dr. Bhattacharjee, I give you the same
`
`·3· · · · caution.
`
`·4· · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· -- I would say -- I
`
`·5· · · · don't know -- more than 10 hours.
`
`·6· ·BY MR. STEPHENS:
`
`·7· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.· Did you conduct any
`
`·8· ·independent searches, such as searches on the
`
`·9· ·Internet, in preparation for the deposition?
`
`10· · · · ·A.· · No.
`
`11· · · · ·Q.· · When were you first contacted by
`
`12· ·someone on behalf of Snap to work on the IPRs or
`
`13· ·any other matters concerning the '327 or
`
`14· ·'084 patents?
`
`15· · · · · · · ·MR. OKANO:· And I give you the same
`
`16· · · · caution in terms of revealing the
`
`17· · · · substance of any privileged
`
`18· · · · communications.· Anything -- you know,
`
`19· · · · initial contact is -- you can -- you can
`
`20· · · · discuss.
`
`21· · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I don't recall the
`
`22· · · · precise date.· I think it was last year,
`
`23· · · · but I don't recall the precise date.
`
`24· ·BY MR. STEPHENS:
`
`25· · · · ·Q.· · Have you ever previously worked for
`
`11
`
`

`

`·1· ·or performed services on behalf of Snap?
`
`·2· · · · ·A.· · No.
`
`·3· · · · ·Q.· · Are you supporting Snap in any other
`
`·4· ·proceedings besides the '084 IPR and the '327
`
`·5· ·IPR?
`
`·6· · · · · · · ·MR. OKANO:· And, again, I caution
`
`·7· · · · you to not reveal the substance of any
`
`·8· · · · privileged communication with your
`
`·9· · · · attorneys.
`
`10· · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I --
`
`11· · · · · · · ·MR. OKANO:· You can answer yes or
`
`12· · · · no.
`
`13· · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· -- well, first, you
`
`14· · · · know, I'm an independent expert. I
`
`15· · · · wouldn't say I'm supporting Snap.· I give
`
`16· · · · my opinions, which are my own.
`
`17· · · · · · · ·And beyond this matter, there's
`
`18· · · · nothing else that I've worked on -- or
`
`19· · · · given any opinions for -- on behalf of
`
`20· · · · Snap or -- yeah.
`
`21· ·BY MR. STEPHENS:
`
`22· · · · ·Q.· · To the best of your knowledge, have
`
`23· ·you ever encountered the '084 patent or the
`
`24· ·'327 patent before being contacted to work on
`
`25· ·these IPRs?
`
`12
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·A.· · Not to the best of my knowledge.
`
`·2· · · · ·Q.· · And prior to your work on these IPRs,
`
`·3· ·can you describe your familiarity or experience
`
`·4· ·with any products from Snap?
`
`·5· · · · ·A.· · I knew that the product existed.
`
`·6· ·I -- I may have tested it out or -- I'm not -- I
`
`·7· ·don't use any social media, so it's un- -- I
`
`·8· ·don't have an account or anything, but I knew of
`
`·9· ·the product.
`
`10· · · · ·Q.· · In the time since you prepared your
`
`11· ·two declarations for the '084 IPR and the '327
`
`12· ·IPR, have any of your opinions changed from those
`
`13· ·that you originally provided in the declarations?
`
`14· · · · ·A.· · No.
`
`15· · · · ·Q.· · Are you currently aware of any errors
`
`16· ·that exist in either declaration?
`
`17· · · · ·A.· · No.· I don't think so.
`
`18· · · · ·Q.· · And during your career, approximately
`
`19· ·how many times have you been retained as an
`
`20· ·expert in litigation matters either as a
`
`21· ·testifying expert or a nontestifying expert?
`
`22· · · · ·A.· · I have given you, as part of my CV, a
`
`23· ·list of litigations, and that's the sum total of
`
`24· ·all litigations that I'm -- that I have ever
`
`25· ·worked on.· And those actually include everything
`
`13
`
`

`

`·1· ·in which I've ever been retained.
`
`·2· · · · · · · ·In many cases, I've been retained
`
`·3· ·but then not asked to do anything at all.· And I
`
`·4· ·would expect in most of them, I've not even been
`
`·5· ·deposed --
`
`·6· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.
`
`·7· · · · ·A.· · -- the only thing I will point out is
`
`·8· ·that just recently, I found out that there was
`
`·9· ·one case from 2017 which somehow -- I don't
`
`10· ·know -- due to a version error or something, it's
`
`11· ·not listed on there.· And I can provide an
`
`12· ·updated copy of that litigation.
`
`13· · · · ·Q.· · Do you recall who the parties to that
`
`14· ·litigation were?
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · Yes.· Phillips -- it's Phillips
`
`16· ·versus Microsoft.
`
`17· · · · ·Q.· · And have you ever previously
`
`18· ·submitted a declaration in an inter partes review
`
`19· ·proceeding?
`
`20· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`21· · · · ·Q.· · Were you deposed in that proceeding?
`
`22· · · · ·A.· · I would expect so, but I can't recall
`
`23· ·precisely off the top of my head.
`
`24· · · · ·Q.· · I'd now like to refer to your '084
`
`25· ·declaration that's Exhibit 1002 in the '084 IPR.
`
`14
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·A.· · In the binder?
`
`·2· · · · ·Q.· · Yeah, it's in the binder.
`
`·3· · · · ·A.· · Okay.
`
`·4· · · · · · · ·Let me try to work with this.
`
`·5· · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Would you mind moving
`
`·6· · · · this?
`
`·7· · · · · · · ·MR. OKANO:· Yeah, that's fine.
`
`·8· · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Thank you.
`
`·9· ·BY MR. STEPHENS:
`
`10· · · · ·Q.· · This would be Tab 1 in the binder.
`
`11· · · · ·A.· · Okay.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · Referring to Paragraph 6, you state,
`
`13· ·Since 2009, I have been a tenured professor at
`
`14· ·University of Maryland.
`
`15· · · · · · · ·Can you briefly describe your areas
`
`16· ·of teaching research that you focus on as a
`
`17· ·professor?
`
`18· · · · ·A.· · Sure.
`
`19· · · · · · · ·Just to clarify, as it says in the
`
`20· ·previous paragraph, I received tenure in 2005.
`
`21· ·It's -- I've been a full professor with tenure
`
`22· ·since 2009 --
`
`23· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · -- and my work is on systems,
`
`25· ·security, networking, as it says in the rest of
`
`15
`
`

`

`·1· ·the paragraph, and that includes work on mobile
`
`·2· ·systems, privacy and security, and so on -- and
`
`·3· ·operating systems.
`
`·4· · · · ·Q.· · Paragraph 6 further states that My
`
`·5· ·teaching and research have focused on all aspects
`
`·6· ·of the technologies pertaining to the
`
`·7· ·'084 patent.
`
`·8· · · · · · · ·Correct?
`
`·9· · · · ·A.· · Yeah, they're sentence fragments;
`
`10· ·but, yes, it does state that.
`
`11· · · · ·Q.· · Yes.
`
`12· · · · · · · ·What did you mean when you refer to
`
`13· ·"all aspects of the technologies pertaining to
`
`14· ·the '084 patent"?
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · So if we take a look at the
`
`16· ·background of the '084 patent, it's describing
`
`17· ·a -- describing the general field of the patent.
`
`18· ·So, for instance, mobile devices, servers,
`
`19· ·sending locations to servers, emergent properties
`
`20· ·due to activities of mobile devices, and so on.
`
`21· ·And I have worked in all of those areas.
`
`22· · · · ·Q.· · Can you describe any experience you
`
`23· ·have in developing, teaching or researching on
`
`24· ·topics related to mapping applications?
`
`25· · · · ·A.· · The -- at the time or . . .
`
`16
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·Q.· · At any time.
`
`·2· · · · ·A.· · Oh, okay.· Let me just -- so I have
`
`·3· ·done a lot of work on location of devices, not
`
`·4· ·the actual cartography part of it but, certainly,
`
`·5· ·geolocating devices and also locating devices
`
`·6· ·using different methods, including audio
`
`·7· ·location.
`
`·8· · · · · · · ·And, of course, these are mobile
`
`·9· ·devices; otherwise, it's relatively --
`
`10· ·relatively easy to know where they are.· But
`
`11· ·I've done work on geolocating both static
`
`12· ·devices by their addresses and also much finer
`
`13· ·grained location mapping of mobile devices.
`
`14· · · · ·Q.· · Do you have experience working with
`
`15· ·GPS technologies?
`
`16· · · · ·A.· · Not specifically beyond -- I have --
`
`17· ·okay.· So I have specifically worked on actually
`
`18· ·getting data from GPS devices in terms of
`
`19· ·location.· It's one of the things we would
`
`20· ·compare to.· The GPS doesn't work particularly
`
`21· ·well in those, usually.
`
`22· · · · · · · ·The other thing is in my privacy
`
`23· ·work, I do look at being able to turn off GPS in
`
`24· ·a completely assured manner, for instance, so
`
`25· ·that the device cannot be tracked by GPS.
`
`17
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·Q.· · Can you describe your -- any
`
`·2· ·experience that you may have related to
`
`·3· ·navigation applications?
`
`·4· · · · ·A.· · Let's see.· Not -- I wouldn't say
`
`·5· ·that I have any specific work on navigation. I
`
`·6· ·would consider that, for the most part, to be a
`
`·7· ·solved problem.· And in my research, I don't
`
`·8· ·encounter navigation beyond -- as I said, in some
`
`·9· ·cases, we are geolocating a large number of
`
`10· ·mobile devices in a confined space.
`
`11· · · · · · · ·And then we often have problems of
`
`12· ·symmetry because, you know -- let's say there's
`
`13· ·a speaker, and then I've geolocated 100 devices.
`
`14· ·There might be different planes over which we
`
`15· ·might get the map wrong.· So we have to worry
`
`16· ·about breaking symmetries, which is related to
`
`17· ·navigation, potentially, but I think that's
`
`18· ·about as close as we get.
`
`19· · · · ·Q.· · Are you aware that the '327 patent
`
`20· ·was filed on August 27th, 2010?
`
`21· · · · ·A.· · I believe that's on the face of
`
`22· ·the patent, but I can also confirm it on, I
`
`23· ·guess, Tab 4.
`
`24· · · · ·Q.· · Tab 4?
`
`25· · · · ·A.· · Yes, I see that on the face of
`
`18
`
`

`

`·1· ·the patent, yes.
`
`·2· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.· Were you familiar with any
`
`·3· ·portable navigation devices before August 27th,
`
`·4· ·2010?
`
`·5· · · · ·A.· · I would think so, yes.· GPS
`
`·6· ·devices -- certainly, I own one.
`
`·7· · · · ·Q.· · What kind of device do you own?
`
`·8· · · · ·A.· · I own a little Garmin, you know, GPS
`
`·9· ·device.· I think my car had a GPS -- I mean, it's
`
`10· ·portable, I guess -- well, I couldn't carry it
`
`11· ·out of the car, but I certainly knew of
`
`12· ·navigational devices prior to 2010.
`
`13· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.· Was -- was your device -- was
`
`14· ·it integrated in the car, or was it something
`
`15· ·that you brought to the car and mounted in it?
`
`16· · · · ·A.· · I had both.
`
`17· · · · ·Q.· · You had both?
`
`18· · · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`19· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.
`
`20· · · · ·A.· · And I think, by 2010 -- I'm trying to
`
`21· ·think whether the phones had it also, but
`
`22· ·anyway -- I certainly had stand-alone navigation
`
`23· ·devices by 2010.
`
`24· · · · ·Q.· · And the stand-alone navigation
`
`25· ·devices -- did they use GPS technology to
`
`19
`
`

`

`·1· ·determine its current location on earth?
`
`·2· · · · ·A.· · Certainly, some of them did.
`
`·3· · · · ·Q.· · Did some of them not?
`
`·4· · · · ·A.· · Some of them may have been augmented
`
`·5· ·with more than GPS.· Right -- I don't know if the
`
`·6· ·car used more than just GPS --
`
`·7· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.
`
`·8· · · · ·A.· · -- but I know that at least for some
`
`·9· ·of them, I'd have to wait for the satellites to
`
`10· ·sync with the device, so they were certainly
`
`11· ·using GPS.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · Did your portable navigational
`
`13· ·devices, as far as you are aware, include a
`
`14· ·memory and a processor?
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · I would think they would, yes.
`
`16· · · · ·Q.· · What information would have been
`
`17· ·stored in the memory of a portable navigation
`
`18· ·device before August of 2010?
`
`19· · · · ·A.· · That's a very broad question.
`
`20· · · · · · · ·Certainly, the -- a few programs for
`
`21· ·interfacing with the GPS module on the device
`
`22· ·itself, parts of the map of the space that I was
`
`23· ·in on earth, a program for displaying and
`
`24· ·interacting with the user, and so on.
`
`25· · · · ·Q.· · Were you able to input a destination
`
`20
`
`

`

`·1· ·and have the device determine a route to the
`
`·2· ·destination?
`
`·3· · · · ·A.· · In some cases, yes.
`
`·4· · · · ·Q.· · When you -- when you input a
`
`·5· ·destination to calculate a route, did the
`
`·6· ·navigation device query a server on a network, or
`
`·7· ·did it perform that processing locally?
`
`·8· · · · ·A.· · I don't know whether -- so I'm trying
`
`·9· ·to remember when my first iPhone was.· I don't
`
`10· ·know if it was before 2010 or not.· I just don't
`
`11· ·recall.
`
`12· · · · · · · ·And, certainly, for something like
`
`13· ·the iPhone and -- back then, I expect -- well,
`
`14· ·it might have been talking to a server.
`
`15· · · · · · · ·Some of the devices were
`
`16· ·stand-alone.· The hand-held ones, I don't
`
`17· ·believe had networking communication that I can
`
`18· ·recall.· The car could have been doing something
`
`19· ·else.· It had the capability to communicate with
`
`20· ·servers.
`
`21· · · · ·Q.· · So the stand-alone ones -- those
`
`22· ·would have had a GPS receiver, correct?
`
`23· · · · ·A.· · I would expect they would, yes.
`
`24· · · · ·Q.· · And they could determine a route to a
`
`25· ·destination using local programs without querying
`
`21
`
`

`

`·1· ·a server?
`
`·2· · · · ·A.· · I mostly actually put in GPS
`
`·3· ·coordinates.· It wasn't actually -- it was -- for
`
`·4· ·geotagging is what I used to use it for.· And,
`
`·5· ·yeah -- it didn't give me turn-by-turn directions
`
`·6· ·that I can recall -- it's been a while -- but it
`
`·7· ·would certainly tell me how far I was and things
`
`·8· ·like that.
`
`·9· · · · ·Q.· · Do you recall when you bought the
`
`10· ·device, was it supplied with maps already stored
`
`11· ·on the device?
`
`12· · · · ·A.· · I think it came with some maps but
`
`13· ·not of the whole world, I don't think.
`
`14· · · · ·Q.· · Sure.
`
`15· · · · · · · ·If you needed to update the maps,
`
`16· ·what would you do on a device that -- on a
`
`17· ·stand-alone device?
`
`18· · · · ·A.· · On a stand-alone device, most
`
`19· ·likely -- I actually don't remember what
`
`20· ·interface it had.· I might have had to plug it
`
`21· ·into USB to get a map or get a new chip with a
`
`22· ·map.
`
`23· · · · ·Q.· · Why would you plug it into USB?
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · In order to get a map from a server.
`
`25· ·But I actually -- frankly, don't remember whether
`
`22
`
`

`

`·1· ·you'd have to just buy a map or whether you had
`
`·2· ·to plug it into a server or both.
`
`·3· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.· Did any of the stand-alone
`
`·4· ·devices have data indicating points of interest
`
`·5· ·on a map?
`
`·6· · · · ·A.· · They might have had.
`
`·7· · · · ·Q.· · Would those points of interest have
`
`·8· ·been preloaded on the device when you bought
`
`·9· ·them?
`
`10· · · · ·A.· · Again, I think I had an iPhone by
`
`11· ·then, and that could have been getting it off of
`
`12· ·the -- that could have been getting it off of the
`
`13· ·network.
`
`14· · · · · · · ·The stand-alone ones, I don't recall
`
`15· ·interacting with points of interest, because as
`
`16· ·I told you, I mostly use it for geotagging.
`
`17· ·So . . .
`
`18· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.· When you geotag a location,
`
`19· ·where was the information representing a geotag
`
`20· ·location stored?
`
`21· · · · ·A.· · Well, mostly in my head.· I would
`
`22· ·just type in the latitude and longitude
`
`23· ·coordinates.
`
`24· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.· I'd like to refer again to the
`
`25· ·declaration that you submitted in the '084 IPR.
`
`23
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · ·On Page 7 of the declaration, you
`
`·2· ·began a section entitled Background of the
`
`·3· ·Relevant Field.
`
`·4· · · · · · · ·Correct?
`
`·5· · · · ·A.· · Correct.
`
`·6· · · · ·Q.· · And in this section, at Paragraph 24,
`
`·7· ·you state, At the time the patent was filed, the
`
`·8· ·basic technology for determining the location of
`
`·9· ·a mobile device was well-known.
`
`10· · · · · · · ·Correct?
`
`11· · · · ·A.· · Correct.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · What technologies were you referring
`
`13· ·to that were well-known?
`
`14· · · · ·A.· · All of -- at least the '084, '327 and
`
`15· ·the Winkler patents give a list of different
`
`16· ·technologies, but, certainly, GPS was well-known.
`
`17· · · · · · · ·One could also augment GPS.· We had
`
`18· ·augmented GPS, which -- it is my understanding
`
`19· ·that the satellite signals are augmented with
`
`20· ·signals on terrestrial -- let's say using
`
`21· ·terrestrial stations.
`
`22· · · · · · · ·One could get, certainly by 2010,
`
`23· ·high resolution by looking at the Wi-Fi
`
`24· ·deployments, much like we do today.· And, of
`
`25· ·course, there are other ways of locating devices
`
`24
`
`

`

`·1· ·using radio location, and so on.· Those were
`
`·2· ·also well-known.
`
`·3· · · · ·Q.· · Can you briefly describe how a mobile
`
`·4· ·device that used GPS to determine its location
`
`·5· ·worked?
`
`·6· · · · ·A.· · The -- are you asking about -- I
`
`·7· ·mean -- okay.· At one level, the device has a --
`
`·8· ·a little GPS chip that has an antenna which is
`
`·9· ·tuned to the GPS frequencies, and it receives a
`
`10· ·stream of data from the GPS satellites.· And then
`
`11· ·there's some code within that chip to decode the
`
`12· ·data that the satellites are sending out.
`
`13· · · · · · · ·And depending upon the number of
`
`14· ·satellites it can see, the symmetry, again, is
`
`15· ·broken, so to speak, and then the device is able
`
`16· ·to figure out a precise -- or, you know,
`
`17· ·precision -- depending upon how much data it
`
`18· ·gets and what resolution GPS is being
`
`19· ·transmitted at, the GPS stream is able to get a
`
`20· ·fix on where it is on earth.
`
`21· · · · · · · ·And depending on the chip itself,
`
`22· ·the chip might just give you the actual
`
`23· ·coordinate, or it might give you the stream such
`
`24· ·that the processor on the device can figure out
`
`25· ·the coordinate.
`
`25
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·Q.· · So, typically, would you expect a --
`
`·2· ·a mobile device that included a GPS chip --
`
`·3· ·the -- the processor would -- the central
`
`·4· ·processor on the device, for example, would
`
`·5· ·communicate with the GPS chip to obtain an
`
`·6· ·indication of the location as identified by the
`
`·7· ·GPS chip?
`
`·8· · · · ·A.· · It would either get raw GPS data or
`
`·9· ·perhaps the actual location.
`
`10· · · · ·Q.· · Or coordinates, perhaps?
`
`11· · · · ·A.· · Coordinates, yes.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.· And it was possible for a
`
`13· ·mobile device to determine its location using GPS
`
`14· ·without connecting to the Internet or a wireless
`
`15· ·communication query, correct?
`
`16· · · · ·A.· · The coordinates do not require
`
`17· ·Internet connectivity --
`
`18· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.
`
`19· · · · ·A.· · -- or receiving the coordinates do
`
`20· ·not require Internet connectivity.
`
`21· · · · ·Q.· · Referring to the '084 declaration
`
`22· ·again, in Paragraph 27, you state that
`
`23· ·Applications that displayed a map, directions or
`
`24· ·bearing were also well-known, and denoting points
`
`25· ·of interest on a display of a mobile device by
`
`26
`
`

`

`·1· ·overlaying information on a map was common.
`
`·2· · · · · · · ·Correct?
`
`·3· · · · ·A.· · Correct.
`
`·4· · · · ·Q.· · Can you describe some of the
`
`·5· ·well-known applications that displayed a map,
`
`·6· ·direction or bearing before August 27, 2010?
`
`·7· · · · ·A.· · I believe iPhones were available, and
`
`·8· ·the -- I think, back then, they were probably
`
`·9· ·using Google Maps.· But that was a common way to
`
`10· ·do it, to display a map.· And I believe
`
`11· ·directions were also available.
`
`12· · · · · · · ·And these devices also had a compass
`
`13· ·application, and then the map itself would have
`
`14· ·a bearing.· And they had -- there were also
`
`15· ·handheld devices in that time frame -- or let's
`
`16· ·say portable devices -- they could be
`
`17· ·hand-held -- which also had similar
`
`18· ·functionality.
`
`19· · · · ·Q.· · And what were you referring to when
`
`20· ·you stated denoting points of interest?· So what
`
`21· ·kind of points of interest were well-known at the
`
`22· ·time?
`
`23· · · · ·A.· · Gas stations, for instance.· But,
`
`24· ·usually, one could put in a list or -- one could
`
`25· ·select from a list of the type of -- a type of
`
`27
`
`

`

`·1· ·point of interest that was of interest to the
`
`·2· ·user.· And if there was one or more nearby, then
`
`·3· ·the applications would usually be able to show
`
`·4· ·them.
`
`·5· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.
`
`·6· · · · · · · ·Okay.· Referring again to the
`
`·7· ·declaration.· On Page 8 of the '084 declaration
`
`·8· ·begins a section captioned Overview of the
`
`·9· ·'084 Patent.
`
`10· · · · · · · ·Correct?
`
`11· · · · ·A.· · Correct.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · And in Paragraph 28 of this section,
`
`13· ·you state, The '084 patent also recognizes that
`
`14· ·prior device users could determine events and
`
`15· ·happenings occurring proximate to a mobile
`
`16· ·device's location and manually compare the
`
`17· ·location of such events to the mobile device's
`
`18· ·location, which could be tedious.
`
`19· · · · · · · ·Correct?
`
`20· · · · ·A.· · Correct.
`
`21· · · · ·Q.· · And you cited Column 3, Lines 11
`
`22· ·through 23 of the '084 patent to support this
`
`23· ·assertion, correct?
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · Correct.
`
`25· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.· Referring to Paragraph 29 of
`
`28
`
`

`

`·1· ·the '084 declaration, you state that The
`
`·2· ·'084 patent explains that an action spot refers
`
`·3· ·to a location or an event where at least one
`
`·4· ·other mobile device engages in activity.
`
`·5· · · · · · · ·Correct?
`
`·6· · · · ·A.· · Correct.
`
`·7· · · · ·Q.· · And you cited Column 3, Lines 3 to 5
`
`·8· ·for this description of "action spot," correct?
`
`·9· · · · ·A.· · Correct.
`
`10· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.· Let's turn for a moment to the
`
`11· ·'084 patent, at Column 3, Lines 3 to 5.
`
`12· · · · · · · ·Can you read what the '084 patent
`
`13· ·states about action spot at Column 3, Lines 3 to
`
`14· ·5?
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · The term, in quotes, action spot
`
`16· ·refers to a location or an event where at least
`
`17· ·one activity is occurring relative to the current
`
`18· ·location of another mobile device.
`
`19· · · · · · · ·I should just say that is not the
`
`20· ·only description of action spot; that's just a
`
`21· ·citation that I've given.· And action spots are
`
`22· ·defined and described in various other ways in
`
`23· ·this '08 -- in this patent as well.
`
`24· · · · ·Q.· · So is it fair to say that you were
`
`25· ·aware of and had considered this passage from the
`
`29
`
`

`

`·1· ·'084 patent when you had prepared your
`
`·2· ·declaration?
`
`·3· · · · ·A.· · Certainly.
`
`·4· · · · ·Q.· · Are there any differences between
`
`·5· ·your description of an action spot at
`
`·6· ·Paragraph 29 of the '084 declaration and the
`
`·7· ·passage from the '084 patent at Column 3, Lines 3
`
`·8· ·to 5?
`
`·9· · · · ·A.· · I mean, I didn't quote the lines, so
`
`10· ·certainly there were differences, as I did not
`
`11· ·write out the lines.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · And what differences are there in the
`
`13· ·statement that you provided at Paragraph 29 and
`
`14· ·the description at Column 3, Lines 3 to 5?
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · I mean, I can read them both --
`
`16· · · · ·Q.· · Sure --
`
`17· · · · ·A.· · -- I don't --
`
`18· · · · ·Q.· · -- sure.
`
`19· · · · ·A.· · -- I mean, you want me to read the
`
`20· ·first line of 29 and read the Lines 3 to 5 again?
`
`21· · · · ·Q.· · Yes, please, go ahead.
`
`22· · · · ·A.· · Okay.
`
`23· · · · · · · ·The '084 patent explains that an
`
`24· ·action spot refers to a location or an event
`
`25· ·where at least one other mobile device engages
`
`30
`
`

`

`·1· ·in activity.
`
`·2· · · · · · · ·And Lines 3 to 5 in Column 3 says,
`
`·3· ·The term "action spot" refers to a location or
`
`·4· ·an event where at least one activity is
`
`·5· ·occurring relative to the current location of
`
`·6· ·another mobile device.
`
`·7· · · · ·Q.· · So you would agree that at Column 3,
`
`·8· ·Lines 4 to 5, the '084 patent provides in this
`
`·9· ·description that at least the activity is
`
`10· ·occurring relative to the current location of
`
`11· ·another mobile device, correct?
`
`12· · · · ·A.· · That's not the only description of an
`
`13· ·action spot in the '084 patent, but those -- I
`
`14· ·mean, the document says what it says here, and
`
`15· ·I've read it twice.
`
`16· · · · ·Q.· · Okay.· Let's refer to Paragraph 34 --
`
`17· ·excuse me -- Paragraph 30 of your '084
`
`18· ·declaration.
`
`19· · · · · · · ·In Paragraph 30, you state that The
`
`20· ·'084 patent also teaches that action spots may be
`
`21· ·determined within a predetermined distance from a
`
`22· ·mobile device and may correspond to device
`
`23· ·activity occurring within a predetermined period
`
`24· ·of time.
`
`25· · · · · · · ·Correct?
`
`31
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·A.· · That's what the document says,
`
`·2· ·correct.
`
`·3· · · · ·Q.· · And further in Paragraph 30, you
`
`·4· ·state that This predetermined period of time can
`
`·5· ·be any specific time period that's measured from
`
`·6· ·the time the mobile device arrived at the current
`
`·7· ·location.
`
`·8· · · · · · · ·Correct?
`
`·9· · · · ·A.· · Sorry.
`
`10· · · · ·Q.· · The last sentence of Paragraph 30.
`
`11· · · · ·A.· · This predetermined period of time can
`
`12· ·be any specific time period that is measured from
`
`13· ·the time the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket