throbber
Naloxone-associated morbidity and mortality Thomas J. Pallasch, D. D.S., M.S.,* and Claire J. Gill, Pharm. D., * * Los Angeles, Calif: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY Naloxone (Narcan) is generally considered to be a narcotic antagonist devoid of pharmacologic activity except for its reversal of opioid (narcotic) effects. Case reports indicate that naloxone in its role of narcotic antagonist may induce hypertension, pulmonary edema, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, or cardiac arrest in certain patients, particularly those with pre-existing cardiac abnormalities. These adverse effects of naloxone may be due to extreme sympathetic nervous system activity resulting from the reversal of narcotic analgesia, an effect of the drug on peripheral or central opioid receptors or a drug interaction with other anesthetic agents. Any patient given naloxone, particularly in the presence of surgical pain, should be closely monitored for adverse cardiovascular effects. I t is generally accepted that the narcotic antago- nist. naloxone (Narcan), is devoid of any therapeu- tic or toxic effects except in the diagnosis and treatment of the signs and symptoms of opioid (narcotic) overdosage and detection of narcotic dependence (the pupillary naloxone test). Accord- ing to Facts and Comparisons (April, 1981): “. . in the absence of narcotics or agonistic effects of other narcotic antagonists, naloxone exhibits essentially no pharmacologic activity.” The only contraindica- tion to naloxone is allergy, and the drug must be used with extreme caution in opioid-dependent persons and in pregnant women. Over the past several years, however. a number of reports associating acute hypertension, pulmonary edema, and cardiac arrhythmias with naloxone employed for opioid antagonism have appeared. In two of the reported cases the patients died. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE In 1974, Tanaka’ reported severe hypertension (blood pressure of 3401150) and atria1 tachycardia in a 5 1 -year-old man with a previous history of mild hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and mild diabetes mellitus who was given naloxone (0.4 mg.) to antagonize the respiratory depressant effects of *Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Periodontics; Chair- man, Pharmacology and Periodontics Sections. **Assistant Professor of Pharmacology. 602 morphine-nitrous oxide anesthesia. Also in 1974 Michaelis and associates’ reported two cases in which patients undergoing open heart surgery for a prosthetic tricuspid valve and aortic graft experi- enced ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia imme- diately after intravenous administration of naloxone (0.1 to 0.4 mg.) to reverse morphine anesthesia. Both patients had also received diazepam and nitrous oxide, and one patient had received additional thiopental, halothane, and succinylcholine. In 1977 a 70-year-old man with precordial pain and conges- tive heart failure, undergoing coronary bypass sur- gery with the anesthetic combination of morphine, diazepam, prednisolone, and pancuronium, was given intravenous naloxone (0.4 mg.) and immedi- ately developed a blood pressure of 170/100 with concomitant pulmonary edema and left ventricular failure.” In 1979 a 73-year-old man with sick sinus syndrome received an epicardial pacemaker under fentanyl, thiopental, succinylcholine, nitrous oxide. and enflurane anesthesia.’ Postanesthetic respirato- ry depression was treated with intravenous naloxone (0.4 mg.); subsequently, the blood pressure rose to 270/140 and was associated with numerous atria1 premature contractions (APC’s). In 1980 Andree; reported the deaths of two healthy female patients after administration of naloxone to reverse narcotic respiratory depression. One patient received meper- idine, hydroxyzine, atropine, thiopental, succinyl- choline, and nitrous oxide and suffered cardiac arrest immediately after intravenous administration 0030-4220/81/120602 + 02$00.20/00 1981 The C. V. Mosby Co.
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2018
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00690
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Volume 52 Number 6 of naloxone (0.4 mg.). The ventricular fibrillation was unresponsive to defibrillation, epinephrine, and closed-chest cardiac massage. The second patient received diazepam, meperidine, thiopental, succi- nylcholine, topical lidocaine, halothane, enflurane, nitrous oxide, and curare and experienced respirato- ry and cardiac arrest after intravenous administra- tion of naioxone (0.2 mg.). Normal sinus rhythm and respiratory rate were eventually restored, but the patient never recovered consciousness and died on the eighth postoperative day. DISCUSSION These reports are most disconcerting to all who have previously considered naloxone to be an in- nocuous drug except to the opioid addict. Yet a most basic principle of pharmacology dictates that no drug has a single action. It would now appear that naloxone has serious adverse cardiovascular effects in certain patients. Most of the authors of these case reports attribute the adverse cardiovascular effects of naloxone to a massive endogenous release of catecholamines (epi- nephrine and norepinephrine) from the adrenal medulla in response to the exacerbation of acute postoperative pain resulting from the abrupt rever- sal of narcotic analgesia. However, it has been reported6-” that naloxone increases pulse rate and left ventricular cardiac work in healthy patients. It is possible that naloxone may displace morphine from central nervous system opioid receptor sites, result- ing in a pressor effect from the free narcotic ago- nist.g Other possible explanations for the adverse cardiovascular effects of naloxone may include a previously unknown effect of the drug on peripheral opioid receptors outside the central nervous system or a drug-drug interaction(s) with one or more anesthetic agents. The majority of these patients had pre-existing heart disease; the young female patients who died did not. It is possible that patients with comprom- ised left ventricular function show adverse effects of pulmonary edema and ventricular fibrillation, while patients with good coronary function respond with atria1 fibrillation.’ It may also be true that these pressor effects of naloxone go undetected in healthy patients, since close cardiovascular monitoring is not routine in such patients. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS It is now apparent that naloxone (Narcan) can no longer be considered an innocuous drug. Several reports have appeared associating adverse cardio- Naloxone-associated morbidity and mortality 603 vascular effects with the use of naloxone as an opioid antagonist. Severe hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, pulmonary edema, and fatal cardiac arrest have occurred in both healthy and medically compromised patients. These adverse effects may be more severe when naloxone unmasks pain sup- pressed by morphine and other opioid analgesics and may be dose related. When naloxone is used to treat narcotic overdos- age, it would appear prudent to employ as low a dose as possible, monitor the blood pressure for at least 10 minutes after naloxone administration, and have ready access to antihypertensive medication.’ Nitroprusside would appear to be the safest and most effective agent for the management of hyper- tensive crisis.‘O This would hold particularly true in patients with pre-existing heart disease and those whose pain is masked by narcotic analgesics. If hypertension should occur, immediate transporta- tion of the patient to a medical facility would appear most advisable. REFERENCES Tanaka, G. Y.: Hypertensive Reaction to Naloxone, J.A.M.A. 228: 25-26, 1974. Michaelis. L. L., Hickey, P. R., Clark. T. A., and Dixon, W. M.: Ventricular irritability Associated With the Use of Naloxone Hydrochloride, Ann. Thorac. Surg. 18: 608-614, 1974. Flacke, J. W., Flacke, W. E., and Williams, G. D.: Acute Pulmonary Edema Following Naloxone Reversal of High- Dose Morphine Anesthesia. Anesthesioloev. 47: 376-378, 1977. . Vd Azar, I., and Tumdorf, H.: Severe Hypertension and Multi- ple Atria1 Premature Contractions Following Naloxone Administration, Anesth. Analg. 58: 524-525, 1979. 5. Andree. R. A.: Sudden Death Following Naloxone Adminis- tration. Anesth. Analg. 59: 782-784, 1980. 6. Desmonts. J. M.. Bohm, G., and Cruderc. E.: Hemodynamic Responses to Low Doses of Naloxone After Narcotic-Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia, Anesthesiology 49: 12-16, 1978. 7. Tigerstedt, I.. and Tannisto. T.: Effect of Naloxone Reversal on Carbon Dioxide Output, Oxygen Uptake and Cardiac Index During Recovery From Fentanyl-Supplemented Anes- thesia, Acta Anesthesiol. Stand. 22: 158-166, 1978. 8. Huse. K., Hartung, E.. and Nadjmabadi. M. H.: The Effects of Naloxone (Narcan) on Circulation and Respiration After Neurolept Anesthesia for Neurosurgical Operations, Anes- thesist 23: 493-499, 1974. 9. Freye. E.: Cardiovascular Effects of High Dosage of Fenta- nyl. Meperidine and Naloxone in Dogs. Anesth. Analg. 53: 40-47. 1974. 10. Cohn, J. N., and Burke, L. P.: Nitroprusside. Ann. Intern. Med. 91: 752. 1979. Reprint requests to: Dr. Thomas J. Pallasch University of Southern California School of Dentistry P.O. Box 77951 Los Angeles, Calif. 90007
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2018
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00690
`Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket