throbber
EUROPEAN
`
`PHARMACOPOEIA
`
`FIFTH EDITION
`
`Volume 1
`
`Published in accordance with the
`
`Convention on the Elaboration ofa European Pharmacopoeia
`(European Treaty Series No. 50)
`
`Council of Europe
`
`Strasbourg
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019—00400)
`Exhibit 2021 Page 1
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2021 Page 1
`
`

`

`The European Pharmacopoeia is published by the Directorate for the Quality of
`Medicines of the Council of Europe (EDQM).
`
`© Council of Europe, 67075 Strasbourg Cedex, France - 2004
`
`All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study,
`this publication may not be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means
`without the prior permission in writing of the publisher.
`
`ISBN: 92-871-5281-0
`
`Printed in France by Aubin, Ligugé
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2021 Page 2
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2021 Page 2
`
`

`

`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2021 Page 3
`
`

`

`11
`
`EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 5.0
`
`5.1.3. Efficacy of antimicrobial preservation
`
`a hazard to the patient from infection and spoilage of the
`preparation. Antimicrobial preservatives must not be used as
`a substitute for good manufacturing practice.
`The efficacy of an antimicrobial preservative may be
`enhanced or diminished by the active constituent of the
`preparation or by the formulation in which it is incorporated
`or by the container and closure used. The antimicrobial
`activity of the preparation in its final container is investigated
`over the period of validity to ensure that such activity has
`not been impaired by storage. Such investigations may be
`carried out on samples removed from the final container
`immediately prior to testing.
`
`During development of a pharmaceutical preparation, it
`shall be demonstrated that the antimicrobial activity of the
`preparation as such or, if necessary, with the addition of
`a suitable preservative or preservatives provides adequate
`protection from adverse effects that may arise from microbial
`contamination or proliferation during storage and use of
`the preparation.
`The efficacy of the antimicrobial activity may be demonstrated
`by the test described below. The test is not intended to be
`used for routine control purposes.
`
`TEST FOR EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL
`PRESERVATION
`
`The test consists of challenging the preparation, wherever
`possible in its final container, with a prescribed inoculum of
`suitable micro-organisms, storing the inoculated preparation
`at a prescribed temperature, withdrawing samples from the
`container at specified intervals of time and counting the
`organisms in the samples so removed.
`The preservative properties of the preparation are adequate
`if, in the conditions of the test, there is a significant fall or no
`increase, as appropriate, in the number of micro-organisms
`in the inoculated preparation after the times and at the
`temperatures prescribed. The criteria of acceptance, in terms
`of decrease in the number of micro-organisms with time, vary
`for different types of preparations according to the degree of
`protection intended (see Tables 5.1.3.—1/2/3).
`
`Staphylococcus aureus
`
`Test micro-organisms
`ATCC 9027; NCIMB 8626;
`Pseudomonas aeruginosa
`CIP 82.118.
`ATCC 6538; NCTC 10788;
`NCIMB 9518; CIP 4.83.
`ATCC 10231; NCPF 3179; [P 48.72.
`ATCC 16404; IMI 149007;
`IP 1431.83.
`
`Candida albicans
`
`Aspergillus niger
`
`Single-strain challenges are used and the designated
`micro-organisms are supplemented, where appropriate,
`by other strains or species that may represent likely
`contaminants to the preparation. It is recommended, for
`example, that Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739; NCIMB 8545;
`CIP 53.126) is used for all oral preparations and
`Zygosaccharomyces rouxiz' (NCYC 381; IP 2021.92) for oral
`preparations containing a high concentration of sugar.
`Preparation of inoculum
`Preparatory to the test, inoculate the surface of agar
`medium B (2.6.12) for bacteria or agar medium C without
`the addition of antibiotics (2.6.12) for fungi, with the recently
`grown stock culture of each of the specified micro-organisms.
`Incubate the bacterial cultures at 3035 °C for 18-24 h, the
`culture of C. albicans at 20—25 °C for 48 h, and the culture of
`A. niger at 20-25 °C for 1 week or until good sporulation is
`obtained. Subcultures may be needed after revival before the
`
`micro-organism is in its optimal state, but it is recommended
`that their number he kept to a minimum.
`To harvest the bacterial and C. albicans cultures, use
`a sterile suspending fluid, containing 9 g/l of sodium
`chloride R, for dispersal and transfer of the surface growth
`into a suitable vessel. Add sufficient suspending fluid to
`reduce the microbial count to about 108 micro-organisms
`per millilitre. To harvest the A. niger culture, use a sterile
`suspending fluid containing 9 g/l of sodium chloride R and
`0.5 g/l of polysorbate 80 R and adjust the spore count to
`about 108 per millilitre by adding the same solution.
`Remove immediately a suitable sample from each suspension
`and determine the number of colony-forming units per
`millilitre in each suspension by plate count or membrane
`filtration (2. 6.12). This value serves to determine the
`inoculum and the baseline to use in the test. The suspensions
`shall be used immediately.
`
`METHOD
`
`To count the viable micro-organisms in the inoculated
`products, use the agar medium used for the initial cultivation
`of the respective micro-organisms.
`Inoculate a series of containers of the product to be
`examined, each with a suspension of one of the test
`organisms to give an inoculum of 105 to 106 micro-organisms
`per millilitre or per gram of the preparation. The volume
`of the suspension of inoculum does not exceed 1 per cent
`of the volume of the product. Mix thoroughly to ensure
`homogeneous distribution.
`Maintain the inoculated product at 20-25 °C, protected
`from light. Remove a suitable sample from each container,
`typically 1 ml or 1 g, at zero hour and at appropriate
`intervals according to the type of the product and determine
`the number of viable micro—organisms by plate count or
`membrane filtration (2.6.12). Ensure that any residual
`antimicrobial activity of the product is eliminated by dilution,
`by filtration or by the use of a specific inactivator. When
`dilution procedures are used, due allowance is made for
`the reduced sensitivity in the recovery of small numbers of
`viable microorganisms. When a specific inactivator is used,
`the ability of the system to support the growth of the test
`organisms is confirmed by the use of appropriate controls.
`The procedure is validated to verify its ability to demonstrate
`the required reduction in count of viable micro-organisms.
`
`CRITERIA OF ACCEPTANCE
`
`The criteria for evaluation of antimicrobial activity are given
`in Tables 5.1.3.—1/2/3 in terms of the log reduction in the
`number of viable micro-organisms against the value obtained
`for the inoculum.
`
`‘
`
`
`.Table 5.1.3.—1. - Parenteral and ophthalmic preparations
`Log reduction
`24h6h 28d 7d 14d
`
`
`
`
`2
`3
`'
`'
`Bacteria
`A
`NR“
`B
`1
`3
`'
`NI“
`
`NI
`2
`A
`Fungi
`
`1B NI
`’NR: no recover
`“NI: no increase
`
`
`
`The A criteria express the recommended efficacy to be
`achieved. In justified cases where the A criteria cannot be
`attained, for example for reasons of an increased risk of
`adverse reactions, the B criteria must be satisfied.
`
`448
`
`See the information section on general monographs (cover pages)
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2021 Page 4
`
`.9”
`C}
`E_.
`m_,
`
`7x
`
`M
`
`E5
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2021 Page 4
`
`

`

`5.1.5. Application of the F0 concept to steam sterilisation
`EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 5.0
`______—________————————
`
`Table 5.1.3.2. - Topical preparations7,—4—
`
` Log reduction
`2 d
`7 d
`14 d
`28 d
`
`Bacteria
`
`A
`B
`
`2
`
`3
`
`'
`3
`
`N]
`N1
`
`NI
`2
`'
`'
`A
`Fungi
`N1
`1
`B
`_—_____.———————-
`
`The A criteria express the recommended efficacy to be
`achieved. In justified cases where the A criteria cannot be
`attained, for example for reasons of an increased risk of
`adverse reactions, the B criteria must be satisfied.
`
`Table 5.1.3.3. - Oral preparations
`____———_————
`Log reduction
`
`14 d 28 (lI,
`
`Bacteria
`3
`N1
`
`1
`N1
`
`Fungi
`
`The above criteria express the recommended efficacy to be
`achieved.
`
`01/2005:50104
`
`5.1.4. MICROBIOLOGICAL
`QUALITY OF PHARMACEUTICAL
`PREPARATIONS
`
`The following chapter is published for information.
`In the manufacture, packaging, storage and distribution of
`pharmaceutical preparations, suitable means must be taken
`to ensure their microbiological quality. The pharmaceutical
`preparations should comply with the criteria given below.
`Category 1
`
`Preparations required to be sterile by the relevant
`monograph on the dosage form and other preparations
`labelled sterile.
`— Test for sterility (2.6.1).
`Category 2
`
`Preparations for topical use and for use in the respiratory
`tract except where required to be sterile and transdermal
`patches.
`— Total viable aerobic count (2.6.12). Not more than
`102 microorganisms (aerobic bacteria plus fungi)
`per gram, per millilitre or per patch (including the
`adhesive and backing layer).
`
`— Transdermal patches: absence of enterobacteria and
`certain other gram-negative bacteria, determined on
`1 patch (including the adhesive and backing layer).
`Other preparations: not more than 101 enterobacteria
`and certain other gram-negative bacteria per gram or
`per millilitre (2.6.13).
`— Absence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, determined
`on 1 g, 1 ml or one patch (including the adhesive and
`backing layer) (2.6.13).
`- Absence of Staphylococcus aureus, determined on
`1 g, 1 ml or one patch (including the adhesive and
`backing layer) (2.6.13).
`
`Category 3
`A. Preparations for oral and rectal administration.
`— Total viable aerobic count (2. 6.12). Not more than
`103 bacteria and not more than 102 fungi per gram
`or per millilitre.
`— Absence of Escherichia coli (1 g or 1 m1) (2.613).
`B. Preparations for oral administration containing raw
`materials of natural (animal, vegetable or mineral)
`origin for which antimicrobial pretreatment is not
`feasible and for which the competent authority accepts
`microbial contamination of the raw material exceeding
`10" viable micro—organisms per gram or per millilitre.
`Herbal medicinal products described in category 4 are
`excluded.
`— Total viable aerobic count (2.6.12). Not more than
`10" bacteria and not more than 102 fungi per gram
`or per millilitre.
`- Not more than 102 enterobacteria and certain other
`gram-negative bacteria per gram or per millilitre
`(2.6.13).
`— Absence of Salmonella (10 g or 10 ml) (2. 6.13).
`— Absence of Escherichia coli (1 g or 1 ml) (2.6.13).
`— Absence of Staphylococcus aureus (1 g or 1 ml)
`(2.6.13).
`Category 4
`Herbal medicinal products consisting solely of one or more
`herbal drugs (whole, reduced or powdered).
`A. Herbal medicinal products to which boiling water is
`added before use.
`— Total viable aerobic count (2.6.12). Not more than
`107 bacteria and not more than 105 fungi per gram
`or per millilitre.
`— Not more than 102 Escherichia coli per gram or per
`millilitre (2.6.13, using suitable dilutions).
`B. Herbal medicinal products to which boiling water is not
`added before use.
`— Total viable aerobic count (2.6.12). Not more than
`105 bacteria and not more than 10“ fungi per gram
`or per millilitre.
`- Not more than 103 enterobacteria and certain other
`gram-negative bacteria per gram or per millilitre
`(2.6.13).
`— Absence of Escherichia coli (1 g or 1 ml) (2.6.13).
`— Absence of Salmonella (10 g or 10 ml) (2.6.13).
`
`01/2005:50105
`
`5.1.5. APPLICATION OF THE F0
`CONCEPT TO STEAM STERILISATION
`OF AQUEOUS PREPARATIONS
`The following chapter is published for information.
`The F0 value of a saturated steam sterilisation process is
`the lethality expressed in terms of the equivalent time
`in minutes at a temperature of 121 °C delivered by the
`process to the product in its final container with reference to
`microorganisms possessing a Z-value of 10.
`The total F0 of a process takes account of the heating up and
`cooling down phases of the cycle and can be calculated by
`integration of lethal rates with respect to time at discrete
`temperature intervals.
`When a steam sterilisation cycle is chosen on the basis
`of the F0 concept, great care must be taken to ensure
`that an adequate assurance of sterility is consistently
`
`___________—_———————————-
`449
`General Notices {1) apply to all monographs and other texts
`
`
`
`I:
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2021 Page 5
`
`35
`
`a Q
`
`;
`
`i:..»
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2021 Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket