throbber
ee
`FORMULATION
`
`Exhibit 2013 Page 1
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 1
`
`

`

` DRUG
`
`
`~ . FORMULATION
`
`
`{
`
`BY
`
`I. RACZ,C. Se. (Chem.)
`Professor of Pharmaceutical Technology
`and Pharmacokinetics
`
`/
`
`|
`
`Semmelweis University Medical School
`
`Budapest, Hungary
`
`JOHN WILEY AND SONS, CHICHESTER - NEW YORK:
`
`
`BRISBANE - TORONTO - SINGAPORE 1989
`
`
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`This is a revised version of the Hungarian Gydégyszerformuldlds published by Medicina Konyvkiadd,
`- Budapest 1984
`
`
`
`All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced by any means,or transmitted, or translated
`into machine language without the written permission of the publisher.
`
`© I. R&ez 1989
`
`Joint edition with Akadémiai Kiad6, Budapest
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data:
`
`Racz, I. (istvan)
`Drug formulation.
`
`
`
`
`Bibliography: p.
`Includes index.
`I. Chemistry, Pharmaccutical. 2. Pharmacokinetics.
`I. Title,
`[DNLM: I. Biopharmaceutics. 2. Chemistry,
`Pharmaceutical. QV 744 R123]
`RS403.R23 1987
`6157.19
`ISBN 0 471 90517 8
`
`87-10520
`
`British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data:
`
`Racz, I.
`Drug formulation.
`1. Chemistry, Pharmaceutical
`1. Title
`615°.19
`
`R5403
`
`ISBN 0 471 90517 8
`
`Printed in Hungary
`
`~_—neeM
`
`]
`
`
`
`4
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 3
`
`

`

`solve the emerging problems in a successful and reproducible manner.
`The experiments within individual phases (zero to four) described in Table 1.1. do
`not necessarily proceed in exact sequence. Results from one experiment may determine
`the extent of parallel examinations. So, for example, if pharmacologic screening of
`an active ingredient during the zero phase did not show any biologic activity, no
`pre-formulation experiments would be performed unless the former result could be
`changed (e.g. by the addition of a substance which increased absorption). Phar-
`maceutical formulation experiments in phases zero to three are indispensable.
`However, these experiments must not be regardedas simple, routine tasks since the
`development of marketable products is highly dependent on the expert's scientific
`knowledge and creativity during these experimental phases. The complete de-
`velopmentofa drugto the marketing stage may take ten to twelve years [2] depending
`primarily on the resourcefulness of the manufacturer and on the legal rules of the
`given country.
`
`1.1. PRE-FORMULATION STUDIES
`
` pharmacologists, physicians, mathematicians, economists, etc.) who work together to
`
`Pre-formulation studies in pharmacy are sometimes defined as those that precede
`product development. The investigator should critically consider the physical-chem-
`ical data even prior to animal testing to provide the development pharmacist with
`some key facts. These facts will bear upon such things as (a) preparing drug samples
`for animal tests in a way that optimizes chances for the compound to exertits
`pharmacological action, (b) ways to solubilize the compound, (c) determining
`photosensitivity or other aspects ofits chemicalstability, etc. These studies commonly
`take a month or two to perform.
`Pre-formulation studies [18] in abroadersense, and applied to a broader spectrum
`“special chemical products, may be defined as those preceding the actual establish-
`ment of the final formula and working directions for product manufacture. These
`may take years to carry out. In this book emphasisis on formulation ofdrug products,
`but pre-formulation is addressed in broad sense. It discusses the approach to
`formulation work in pre-development, development, pilot scale-up studies, and
`pre-manufacturing development.It tries to show what studies are required and how
`to perform them in order to get uniformly good drug products of high quality [16].
`When a potentially marketable new active ingredient is identified, it is important
`to find the most satisfactory and efficacious pharmaceutical dosage form. Such
`preparations must be stable, compatible, bioavailable and able to be manufactured
`in an economical manner. Pre-formulation experimentsare designed to answer these
`basic questions on a small scale [21].
`The most important is that the active ingredient possess appropriate biological
`activity or at least be a chemical analogue which has advantageous actions of
`therapeutic properties when compared with the parent compound. When favourable
`vacnite have been revorted from the pharmacological and acute toxicity tests, the
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL(IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 4
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 4
`
`

`

`Table 1.1. Outline for the development of a new active ingredientinto a pharmaceutical product
`PHASE 0
`0.1. Conception, synthesis, synthesis of radio-labelled compound.
`0.2. Physicochemical investigations.
`0.3. Preliminary analytical studies on the active ingredient.
`0.4. Screening for biological activity.
`.
`0.5. Acute and subchronic toxicity tests.
`0.6. Pre-formulation experiments.
`0.7. Marketing prognosis.
`
`PHASEI.
`1.1. Clinical phase I. Examination of tolerance in healthy human volunteers.
`Selection of a suitable pharmaceutical dosage form and strength. Determined from preliminary
`short-term ADMEtests and estimated pharmacokinetic parameters.
`1.2. Investigation of metabolic pathways of the drug.
`1.3. Chronic toxicity tests.
`1.4. Investigation of mutagenic, teratogenic and carcinogenic effects.
`1.5. Investigation of the active ingredient-DNA repair system.
`1.6. Synthetic chemical experiments concerningscale up and manufacture of the experimental industrial
`product.
`1.7. Drug formulation experiments (stability, compatibility, biopharmaceutics, dosage regimen design, etc.).
`1.8. Total analytical investigation of the active ingredient, elaboration ofstability testing methods and
`assays for specific measurements of metabolite{s).
`1.9. Elaboration of marketing plans.
`
`PHASE 2.
`2.1. Clinical phase I. Randomized double blind, controlled clinical trials to verify the pharmacological
`effect in the patient population indicated. Long-term ADMEtests and estimation of pharmacokinetic
`parameters.
`2.2. Drug formulation experiments. Determination ofbioavailability. Elaboration ofproduction guidelines.
`Pharmaceutical: pilot plant experimental work. Scale up experiments. Middle scale production of
`clinical samples.
`2.3, Analytical investigation of pharmaceutical product.
`2.4. Administrative work in accordance with marketing plans.
`2.5. Marketing.
`
`PHASE3.
`3.1. Wide-spreadingclinical trials. Evaluations of the side-effects and possible drug interactions.
`3.2. Large-scale manufacturing of the pharmaceutical products. Determination of the shelf-life.
`3,3. Elaboration of quality norms for the product.
`3.4, Administrative work in accordance with marketing plans. Registration certificate.
`3.5. Detailed marketing for estimation of claims and requirements.
`
`PHASE 4. (Summarizing, evaluation)
`4.4. Data concerning the synthesis.
`4.2. Analytical data.
`43. Manufacturing data.
`4.4, Clinical data(field of indication, directions for use).
`4.5, Registration.
`4.6. Marketing data.
`4.7, Production data.
`48. Patent situation.
`
`aaaa
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL(IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 5
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 5
`
`

`

`
`
`At this time, information obtained during chemical synthesis (1c. possible de-
`composition products, deteriorating by-products, etc.) along with preliminary analyt-
`ical data are at the disposal of the pre-formulation scientists.
`Schematically, the process of pre-formulation experiments may be summarized as
`follows. Thelist is by no means complete since separate formulas must be developed
`for special cases, and of course, the physicalstate(solid, liquid) of the active ingredient
`must be considered. Nevertheless, the scheme presents a logical sequence of experi-
`ments presently used in pre-formulation development of a pharmaceutical product.
`It is important to emphasize that the schemecontains the elaboration of production
`formulas and working directions as well as standards of quality. In fact, these are
`described in the formulation section, however, they are presented here to show the
`unity of the whole process.
`
`1.1.1. CONVENTIONAL PHARMACEUTICAL
`PREPARATIONS
`
`LLLI. HOMOGENEOUS LIQUID-PHASE PHARMACEUTICAL
`PREPARATIONS
`
`Characteristics of the active ingredient
`1.
`1.1. Colour, odour, taste, consistency.
`2.
`Solubility.
`1.2.1. Solubility in hydrophilic solvents (ethanol, isopropanol, 1,2-propylene glycol,
`glycerol, polyethylene glycol 300, acetone, etc.).
`1.2.2. Dependence of solubility on pH in buffered aqueous systems (pH range 3-7).
`1.2.3. Solubility in lipophilic solvents (chloroform, propellents (fluorinated hydrocar-
`bons) methylene chloride, vegetable oils, isopropyl myristate, etc.). These data
`are needed for planning biopharmaceutical experiments(Le., absorption,distri-
`bution, excretion).
`1.2.4. Solubility in artificial gastric and intestinal juices at 37°C.
`1.3. Melting point.
`1.4. Data on analytical purity.
`1.4.1. Loss during exposure to dry or humid conditions.
`1.4.2. Ignition residue.
`1.4.3. Inorganic elements and heavy metals.
`1.4.4. Organic impurities.
`1.4.5. Differential scanning calorimetry characteristics.
`1.5.
`pH and/or pK valuesofthe active ingredient.
`1.6. Qualitative analytical data.
`* 1.6.1. Identification reactions.
`1.6.2. IR- and UV-spectra.
`1.6.3. Identity and purity assay by thin layer chromatography.
`1.7. Quantitative analytical data.
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL(IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 6
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 6
`
`

`

`
`
`1.7.2.
`1.7.3.
`1.8.
`
`Analytical methods to detect specific decomposition products.
`Analytical methods applicable to pharmacokinetic measurements.
`Preliminary stability data (effects due to exposure to light, various pHs and
`solvents, and oxygen). Usually a 0.1-0.5 per cent aqueoussolution-ofthe active
`ingredient buffered to pH values between 2 and 8 are stored at room temperature
`and at 50°C.If the solubility of the active ingredientis limited, small quantities
`of a semi-polar solvent are added to improve the solubility. The quantity of
`active ingredient in the samples is periodically determined using analytical
`methodssensitive for the detection of specific decomposition products. These
`stability experiments last for 1-4 weeks, depending on the chemical structure
`of the active ingredient.
`
`Characteristics of the pharmaceutical product
`Colour, odour, taste, consistency.
`pH value.
`Density.
`Viscosity.
`Surface tension.
`Refraction index.
`Solid material content.
`Isotonia (if necessary).
`
`Compatibility testing of the pharmaceutical product
`Drug—druginteractions.
`Drug-excipient interactions.
`Excipient—excipient interactions.
`Interactions of the drug and/or excipients with the packaging materials.
`Stability testing of the pharmaceutical product
`Physical stability.
`Cold endurance (storage at 5°C for an extended time period).
`Possibility of dilution.
`Qualitative chemical stability.
`Light stability. Stability against UV-irradiation. The sample is moved in a
`planarfield (16 rotations per minute) for 5 h at a distance of 50 cm from a
`750 W mercury-vapor lamp. Changes in composition are determined.
`. Heatstability. (It is advisable to proceed with the experiments until a significant
`changein stability is observed.) Heat stability is determined on samples stored
`at 40, 50 and 60°C for 30 days. In the case of sterile preparations,stability at
`120°C for 20 min is also determined. Chemical changes in the heat-treated
`samples are determined to measurestability.
`Quantitative chemical stability. The expiration date is determined using stan-
`dardized, predictive kinetic methods and measuring specific decomposition
`products.
`Microbiological stability. Sporostatic, fungistatic, and bacteriostatic activity is
`determined in a cultured media with different concentrations of the pharmaceuti-
`nal wnendunt Gia
`iniantinne aa denne anhitinns fae eran d alanncine natn’
`
`4.1.1.
`4.1.2.
`4,2.
`4.2.1.
`
`4.3,
`
`44,
`
`ceee
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL(IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 7
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 7
`
`

`

`4.5.
`
`4.6.
`
`4.7.
`
`5.1.
`Shligis
`5.1.2.
`5.1.3.
`
`5.2.1.
`
`6.
`6.1.
`6.1.1.
`6.1.2.
`6.2.
`
`6.3.
`
`6.4.1.
`6.4.2.
`6.4.3.
`
`6.4.4.
`6.5.
`6.6.
`
`Toxicological stability. The toxicity of the product must not change sigr
`ficantly after long-term storage or heat treatment.
`Therapeutic stability. The therapeutic effect of the product must not chan;
`significantly after long-term storage or heat treatment.
`Stabilization experiments.
`Formula and working directions for the production of the drug
`Composition data.
`Actual composition of the pharmaceutical product.
`Description, qualitative characteristics, and information about excipients adde
`Directions for weighing.
`Technological operations.
`List of necessary operations for production (i.e., requirements for dissolutic
`sequence of steps in formulation, time required for production, manpower a1
`system requirements, aseptic techniques, sterilization procedures, etc.).
`Biopharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic data
`Characterization of dissolution rates.
`Intrinsic dissolution rate of the drug.
`Changes in dissolution rate in the presence of surfactants.
`Distribution coefficients. Possible lipophilic solvents include: n-hexane, octan:
`and chloroform. The pH value of the aqueous solution should be 1.2 and 6
`respectively, at 37°C.
`Modelling of absorption in vitro.
`Pharmacokinetic data.
`:
`Determination of the elimination rate constant.
`Determination of the half-life of the active ingredient in vivo.
`Determination of steady-state serum concentrations after repeated administ:
`tion.
`Determination of bioavailability (if not administered intravenously).
`Elaboration of the dosage regimen and directions for use.
`Drug metabolism data.
`
`Directions for storage and packaging
`
`Health and accident prevention provisions
`
`1.1.1.2. HETEROGENEOUS SOLID-PHASE PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
`
`1.
`1.2.
`1.3.
`
`1.4.
`
`1.6.
`
`Physical characteristics of the active ingredient
`Crystal structure, Salt form, if a salt.
`Particle size and its distribution and/or specific surface area.
`Weight volume(the volume of 100 g of substance). Volume weight(the weig
`of 100 cm? of substance).
`Density.
`Colour, odour, taste, consistency.
`Flowability.
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL(IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 8
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 8
`
`

`

`SE
`
`liaEe
`
`mM,
`id
`
`ht
`
`Zils
`2.1.1.
`
`2.1.2.
`
`2.1.3.
`
`2.1.4.
`2.2.
`2.3.
`
`2.5,
`
`3.1.
`
`3.3.
`
`4.t,
`
`4.2,
`
`4.3.
`
`4.4,
`
`3.1.
`
`5.2.
`5.2.1.
`
`Physicochemical characteristics of the active ingredient
`Solubility.
`Solubility in hydrophilic solvents (ethanol, isopropanol, 1,2-propyleneglycol,
`glycerol, polyethylene glycol 300, acetone, etc.).
`Solubility in lipophilic solvents (chloroform, propellents (fluorinated hydrocar-
`bons) methylene chloride, vegetable oils, isopropyl myristate, etc.).
`Dependence ofsolubility on pH (usually in the range of 3—7) in buffered aqueous
`systems.
`Solubility in artificial gastric and intestinal juices at 37°C.
`Melting point.
`pK of the active ingredient.
`Equilibrium vapor pressure, hygroscopicity.
`Wettability (Enslin number).
`
`Analytical data on the active ingredient
`Analytical purity data (see 1.1.1.1—1.4,).
`Qualitative analytical data (see 1.1.1.1—1.6.).
`Quantitative analytical data (see 1.1.1.1.-1.7)).
`
`Compatibility examinations
`Physical and chemical compatibility. The active substance is mixed (1:1) with
`carriers and excipients that may be used in the formulation. These mixtures
`are adjusted to 5 per cent humidity conditions and kept in closed vessels in an
`air thermostat at 50°C for 10 days. Data before and after the treatment are
`evaluated.
`i
`Determination of the optimal pH. The dissolved or dry active substance is
`examined in-different buffered solutions (pH 2-7) or 5 g powder mixtures are
`moistened with approximately 3 per cent solutions. These are kept in an air
`thermostatin closed vessels at 50°C for 10 days. Data before andafter treatment
`are evaluated to select the most desirable buffer additive, if needed.
`Optimal humidity is determined accordingto the stability test results obtained
`from studies of samples at various humidity conditions.
`Comment: Samplesafter tests 4.1., 4.2., and 4.3. must undergo semi-quantitative
`thin layer chromatography for examination of possible decomposition products.
`Chemical structures of the decomposition products should be determined,if
`possible, in order to understand the stoichiometry of decomposition pathways.
`Interactions of the active ingredients and excipients with packaging materials.
`
`Stability testing
`Physical stability. Stability of the crystal structure is tested by examining
`morphological changes caused by pressure (30 t/cm?), heat, drying and moisture.
`Qualitative chemicalstability.
`Light stability. Against natural light: stability is determined by measuring the
`chemical changes which a sample undergoes whenirradiated for 10 days by a
`150 W xenon lampat a distance of 40 cm. The temperature should ‘not exceed
`15°C. Against UV-light (see 1.1.1.1-4.2.1,.
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL(IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 9
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 9
`
`

`

`
`
`5.2.2.
`
`$.2.3.
`5.3.
`5.4.
`
`5.5.
`
`5.7.
`
`6.1.
`6.1.1.
`6.1.2.
`6.1.3.
`6.1.4.
`
`6.2.1.
`
`6.2.2,
`
`6.3.1.
`
`Thermalstability. It is advisable to test at least 3 dispersionsofdifferent humidity
`by storing them at 40, 50 and 60°Cfor a period of 30 days.
`:
`Determination of susceptibility to oxidation.
`Quantitative chemical stability (determination of expiration date).
`Microbiological stability. Bacteria count determinationof a fresh sample of the
`active ingredients and a sample kept open in the laboratory for one week. The
`bacteria count of granules or the final product indicates impurities introduced
`with excipients during operation steps. The bacteria count after one week of
`exposure indicates the potential for microorganism proliferation.
`Toxicological stability (see 1.1.1.1-4.5)).
`Therapeutica! stability (see 1,1.1.1.-4.6.).
`Stabilization experiments.
`Directions and guidelines for drug production
`Composition data.
`Actual composition.
`Description, qualitative characteristics and information about the excipients.
`Instructions for weighing.
`Directions concerning compatible and non-compatible excipients.
`Technological operations.
`List of necessary operations(e.g., direct tabletting, wet or dry granulating, order,
`time, energy requirements of operationalsteps, etc.).
`Diagram andinterval of drying.
`.
`Parameters achievable by the technological operations.
`Granulates (powder mixtures): weight volume, distribution of particle size,
`flowability, optimal humidity, equilibrium vapor pressure, and compatibility.
`Tablets, dragees, capsules, dragee cores: geometrical data, weight, solidity.
`disintegration time, resistance to abrasion and humidity.
`Biopharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic data of the pharmaceutical product
`Characterization of the dissolution rate.
`Intrinsic dissolution rate of the drug.
`Apparent dissolution rate of the drug in the dosage form.
`Changesofthe dissolution rate in the presence of surfactants.
`Distribution coefficient (see 1.1.1.1.-6.2.).
`In vitro absorption modelling.
`Pharmacokinetic data.
`Determination of the absorption rate constant.
`Determination of the elimination rate constant.
`Calculation of the biologic half-life of the drug.
`Pharmacokinetic evaluation following single dose, multiple dose and chroni
`administration. Determination of steady-state concentrations.
`Determination of bioavailability.
`Metabolism data.
`Directions for storage and packaging
`Health and accident prevention provisions
`
`6.3.2.
`
`71.
`TAAL.
`7.1.2.
`7.1.3.
`7.2.
`73.
`74.
`TAA.
`7A2.
`74,3.
`TAA.
`
`TAS,
`7.5,
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL(IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 10
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 10
`
`

`

`1.1.1.3. HETEROGENEOUSFLUID- AND SEMI-SOLID-PHASE PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
`
`1.
`
`Physical characteristics of the active substance (The appropriate tests must
`be carried out for solid or liquid active ingredients, respectively.)
`1.1. Crystal structure. Isomorphism, polymorphy.
`1.2.
`Particle size and particle size distribution.
`1.3. Weight volume(the volumeof 100 g substance). Volume weight(the weight of
`100 cm? substance).
`1.4. Density.
`1.5. Colour, odour, taste, consistency.
`1.6. Viscosity.
`
`2.
`21.
`
`Physicochemical characteristics of the drug
`Solubility (see 1.1.1.2.-2.1.-2.1.3.). It is necessary to extend the tests to include
`excipients which may be used in formulation (ie. carriers in suppositories,
`ointments, etc.).
`2.2. Melting point.
`2.3. Wettability (Enslin number).
`2.4.
`pK of the active ingredient.
`3.
`Analytical data about the active ingredient
`3.1, Analytical purity data (see 1.1.1.1.—-1.4).
`3.2. Qualitative analytical data (see 1.1.1.1—-1.6).
`3.3. Quantitative analytical data (see 1.1.1.1—-1.7,).
`4.
`Compatibility testing. During controltesting, in addition to the normaltests,
`it
`is also advisable to examine the range of the particle size distribution,
`rheological parameters, melting point, setting point, dropping point, separation
`of components, sedimentation, and redispersability.
`41. Examination of drug-druginteractions.
`42. Examination of drug-excipient interactions.
`43. Examination of interactions among excipients.
`5.
`Stability testing. It is desirable to carry outstability testing with samples of
`optimum composition.
`Physical stability.
`5.1.
`5.1.1. Cold endurance and freeze-thaw stability.
`5.1.2. Determination of the maximal temperature which does not cause changes in
`consistency.
`5.2. Qualitative chemical stability.
`5.2.1. Light stability (see 1.1.1.2.-5.2.1,).
`5.2.2. Heat stability determined on the basis of physical properties of the drug product
`(m.p.).
`52.3. Examination of susceptibility to oxidation.
`53. Quantitative chemical stability. The expiration date of the active ingredientis
`determinedon thebasis of principles of reaction kinetics with the measurement
`of specific decomposition products.
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL(IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 11
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 11
`
`

`

`54. Microbiological stability. Testing of sporostatic, fungistatic, and bacteriostatic
`activities of appropriately contaminated drug products.
`5.5. Toxicological stability (see 1.1.1.1.-4.5,).
`5.6. Therapeutical stability (see 1.1.1.1-4.6).
`5.7.
`Stabilization experiments.
`6.
`Formula and working directions for the production of the drug
`6.1. Composition data.
`6.1.1. Actual composition of the pharmaceutical product.
`6.1.2. Description, qualitative characteristics, and information about excipients.
`6.1.3. Dosage instructions(disclosure of the extruding factor in case of suppositories).
`6.1.4. Instructions concerning compatible and non-compatible excipients.
`6.2. Technological operations.
`6.2.1. List of necessary operations for production.
`6.2.2. Type, intensity, and duration of mixing.
`6.2.3. Parameters of heat treatment.
`6.2.4. Cooling parameters.
`6.3.
`Parameters achievable by the technological operations (related to the type of
`drug product): particle size, particle size distribution, setting point, flowing point,
`flowing curves, dropping point, thixotropy, sedimentation rate, cream forming,
`separation,redispersability, breaking hardness, melting time, dissolution time.
`Biopharmaceutical data on the drug product
`7.
`7.1. Characterization of dissolution rate.
`7.1.1. Intrinsic dissolution rate of the drug.
`7.1.2. Apparent dissolution rate of the drug from the dosage form.
`7.1.3. Changes in dissolution rate in the presence of surfactants.
`7.2. Distribution coefficients (see 1.1.1.1.-6.2.).
`7.3. Modelling of absorption in vitro.
`7.4.
`Pharmacokinetic data
`7.4.1. Determination of the absorption rate constant.
`7.4.2. Determination of the elimination rate constant.
`7.4.3. Calculation of the biological half-life of the drug.
`7.4.4, Pharmacokinetic evaluation following single dose, multiple dose and chronic
`administration. Determination of steady-state concentrations.
`7.4.5. Determination of bioavailability.
`7.5. Metabolism data.
`
`8.
`9,
`
`Directions for storage and packaging
`Health and accident prevention provisions
`
`1.1.1.4. OTHER PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
`
`According to statistical data, the drug types listed above represent 90 to 95 per
`centof all conventional dosage formulations. In the case of less common drug forms
`which were not discussed,e.g., the aerosols, additional pre-formulation aspects must
`
`
`
`
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL(IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 12
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 12
`
`

`

`also be considered(e.g., solubility and dissolution rate of the drug in the propellent,
`determination offilm elasticity, its drying time, the equilibrium gas tension in the
`case of aerosols for wound dressing, etc.).
`
`1.1.2. NON-CONVENTIONAL LONG-ACTING
`PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
`
`Since the 1930s pharmaceutical industry has spent mostofits research efforts on
`the synthesis of new molecules. Consequently, the development and application of
`new methods or modes of administration of pharmaceutical compounds have
`progressed very slowly. The present methods of therapy using conventional drugs,
`which form the majority of pharmaceuticals, are rather quantitative (with solid phase
`forms) or concentrational (with liquid phase forms). The very long-acting dosage
`formulations developed in the last decade summarize and,
`in addition to the
`above-mentioned aspects, also use the knowledge of such time-dependentfactors as
`the absorption and elimination rates, and the duration of treatment.
`Major advantages of very long-acting dosage forms include the less frequent
`administration of the dosage form along with increased bioavailability, and a decrease
`in side-effects.
`In some ways,
`the process of pre-formulation and formulation
`examination of long-acting pharmaceutical dosage formsdiffers from those described
`above. The following pre-formulation scheme depicts the differencies in the rational
`evaluation of both types of dosage forms.
`
`Pharmacokinetic examinations
`1.
`1.1. Compilation of pharmacological, toxicological and clinical experimental data
`for the active ingredient or the drug product and evaluation ofits suitability
`as a very long-acting drug product.
`Preliminary pharmacokinetic experiments.
`1.2.
`in the organism.
`1.2.1. Qualitative testing of the fate of the active ingredient
`Identification of the metabolites and determination of the primary routes of
`elimination.
`1.2.2. Elaboration of specific quantitative microanalytical methods for determination
`of the active ingredient and its metabolites in the biological fluids andtissues,
`1.2.3. Examination of the interaction between the drug and serum proteins.
`1.2.4, Elaboration and choice of methods for determination of therapeutic activity.
`1.2.5. Construction of a pharmacokinetic model.
`1.3.
`Pharmacokinetic experiments.
`1.3.1. Construction of time—action curves upon a single intravenous and single
`and repeated oral administration of the active ingredient with the following
`variables:
`drug concentration in blood
`drug concentration in urine
`metabolite(s) concentration in blood
`metabolite(s) concentration in urine
`drug concentration in faeces
`bound drug concentration
`
`vs time
`us time
`vs time
`vs time
`vs time
`vs time
`
`
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL(IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 13
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 13
`
`

`

`
`
`1.3.2. Quantitative relationship of pharmacologicalactivity with the pharmacokinetic
`profile of the drug,
`1.4. Evaluation of pharmacokinetic experiments.
`1.4.1. Analysis and modelling of the pharmacokinetic data using an analogue or
`digital computer.
`1.4.2. Examination and correlation of the drug activity and the pharmacokinetic
`parameters.
`1.4.3. Calculation of minimum and maximum values for blood or other biological
`tissue levels needed to assure therapeutic activity.
`1.4.4. Calculation of dose and pharmacokinetic parameters for a sustained release
`formulation.
`
`Biopharmaceutical examinations
`2.
`2.1. Determination of the dissolution rate of the drug andits derivatives (free acid
`or base, salts, esters, and possible prodrugs) in vitro as a function of pH and
`enzyme content of the solvent.
`2.2.
`In vitro absorption rate experiments andits relationship to pH.
`2.3.
`Selective optimization of methods for reducing the dissolution rate of a given
`drug with regard to production possibilities.
`2.4. Biopharmaceutical characterization of pharmaceutical dosage form (dissolution
`tate, absorption rate, etc.).
`Instructions and proposals for drug production
`3.
`3.1. Data concerning drug product composition.
`3.1.1. The actual composition.
`3.1.2. Description and qualitative characteristics of new excipients.
`3.1.3, Directives concerning compatible and non-compatible excipients.
`3.1.4. Instructions for weighing.
`3.2. Technological operations. Complete description of proposed operations.
`3.3. Characterization of parameters achievable by the technological operations.
`4.
`Pharmaceutical stability and compatibility data (see 1.1.1.)
`5.
`Pharmacokinetic data
`5.1. Experiments in animals with usual and with very long-acting drug formulations
`in order to comparetoxicities.
`5.2. Comparative pharmacokinetic experiments in humans to determine the absorp-
`tion and activity of the very long-acting dosage form.
`5.3. Determination ofthe bioavailability of the drug in this dosage form.
`5.3.1. Data on the relative onset of action.
`3.3.2. Data on the relative duration ofaction.
`6.
`Directions for storage and packaging of the drug formulation
`7.
`Health and accident prevention provisions
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL(IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 14
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 14
`
`

`

`1.2. DRUG FORMULATION
`
`Numeroussteps are involved in developing a therapeutically active compoundinto
`a marketable drug product.Initial pre-formulation experiments are designed to study
`the physical and chemical properties of the compound with the intent of selecting a
`dosage formulation of optimum composition. Carefully detailed, small-scale pre-
`formulation studies are performed before a dosage formulation is developed and
`subjected to pilot and finally large-scale industrial production. Once a dosage
`formulation is approved for use in the market place, production on a large-scale will
`be required. This will necessitate the use of large volumes of raw material, automation
`in the production and packaging of the dosage formulation, and the developmentof
`quality control standards to assure the stability, uniformity, purity, and identity of
`the drug product.
`
`1.3. MATHEMATICAL DESIGN
`OF PRE-FORMULATION
`AND FORMULATION EXPERIMENTS
`
`Initial formulation experiments should be designed to generate pertinent data
`regarding physical and chemical properties of the drug and to identify appropriate
`excipients which could be used in the formulation. The formulator must also consider
`the quality and aesthetic natureofthe final product, as well as the economicfeasibility
`of large-scale production. These experiments must be carefully designed to collect
`this information in a timely manner. The primary purposeofthis chapteris to present
`a general overview of how pre-formulation experiments are designed. It would be
`impossible to present a detailed discussion of experimental design within this chapter.
`
`13.1. ESTABLISHING THE LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
`
`Pre-formulation studies should be designed to provide objective experimental
`results. For example, controversial data may be foundin theliterature regarding the
`inhibition of drug absorption by various excipients in tablet and suppository
`formulations. However, much of the controversy is based on subjective opinions
`rather than objective experimentalresults. It is evident that wheneverdata are analysed
`in an experiment, a level of statistical significance must be established in order to
`correctly and logically interpret the data.
`Subjective evaluation ofdata may be sufficientif the results are significantly different
`from results expected due to random fluctuations. When evaluating results, the
`investigator should apply uniform criteria. However,if large differences in the data
`occur due to random fluctuations, intuitive judgement may be misleading. In this case,
`experiments should be designed and statistically evaluated for significance.
`In
`industrial experiments ideal circumstances cannot always be achieved. Therefore, the
`results may not always apply to a more complicated practical situation [6].
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL(IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 15
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2013 Page 15
`
`

`

`
`
`CHAPTER3
`
`PHYSICOCHEMICAL
`INTERACTIONS ENCOUNTERED
`IN THE COURSE
`OF DRUG PRODUCT PREPARATION
`
`3.1. GENERAL ASPECTS,
`BASIC PRINCIPLES AND DEFINITIONS
`
`The major objective of research and development in pharmaceutical technolo

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket