throbber
Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, 4(2), 199–208 (1999)
`
`RESEARCH ARTICLE
`
`Formulation of Proteins in Vacuum-Dried
`Glasses. II. Process and Storage Stability in
`Sugar-Free Amino Acid Systems
`
`Markus Mattern,1,2 Gerhard Winter,2 Ulrich Kohnert,3
`and Geoffrey Lee1
`1DepartmentofPharmaceuticalTechnology,Friedrich-AlexanderUniversity,
`Erlangen,Germany
`2BoehringerMannheimGmbH,GalenicalDevelopment,Mannheim,Germany
`3BoehringerMannheimGmbH,BiochemicalResearch,Penzberg,Germany
`
`Received February 18, 1998; Accepted August 6, 1998
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The purpose of this research was to investigate the freeze- and vacuum-drying behavior of (cid:108)-amino
`acids of current/potential use as adjuvants for formulating proteins. The analytical methods used
`were wide-angle x-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, and scanning electron micros-
`copy. Protein analysis was performed either as an activity assay (lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) or
`by size-exclusion chromatography (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [rhG-CSF]). After samples
`were freeze-dried, only the four basic amino acids (arginine, lysine, histidine, and citrulline) formed
`amorphous solids, which, however, were partially crystalline. The remaining amino acids all formed
`fully crystalline solids. After samples were vacuum-dried, (20(cid:176) C, 0.1 mbar, 1 ml fill volume in 2-ml
`vials) fully crystalline solids were formed by all of the amino acids. For arginine, the addition of
`either HCl, H3PO4, or H2SO4 sufficient to form the respective salt produced amorphous solids after
`vacuum-drying, but they had high residual water contents and low glass transition temperatures (Tg).
`Addition of phenylalanine to arginine base inhibited crystallization of the latter at low concentrations
`during vacuum-drying procedure, leading to formation of a pure rubbery solid. At higher concentra-
`tions the phenylalanine crystallized, producing dry products with glass transition temperatures of
`.60(cid:176) C. The process and storage stability of LDH and rhG-CSF in the vacuum-dried phenylalanine/
`arginine glasses was greatly improved at temperatures up to 40(cid:176) C compared with the unprotected
`proteins. Uptake of moisture during storage was, however, a complicating factor, reducing Tg, promot-
`ing crystallization, and leading to decreased protein stability. The PO4 salt of arginine produced
`especially high glass transition temperatures after it was vacuum-dried. These sugar-free amino acid
`formulations thus are potential stabilizes for proteins.
`KEY WORDS: Amino acid; Freeze-drying; Phosphoric acid; Protein stabilization; Vacuum-drying.
`
`Address correspondence to Geoffrey Lee, Lehrstuhl fu¨r Pharmazeutische Technologie, Cauerstr. 4, 91058 Erlangen, Germany. Fax:
`09131/85 95 45. E-mail: g.lee@pharmtech.uni-erlangen.de
`
`Copyright (cid:211)
`
`1999 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`www.dekker.com
`
`199
`
`-199-
`
`
`
`
`MAIA Exhibit 1039
`MAIA V. BRACCO
`IPR PETITION
`
`

`

`200
`
`Mattern et al.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`A number of amino acids are frequently cited as being
`suitable bulking agents for freeze-dried formulations.
`There exists some evidence that certain amino acids also
`act as cryoprotectants. These protect sensitive active
`agents, especially peptides and proteins, against various
`destabilizing effects occurring in aqueous solution during
`the initial freezing phase, e.g., freeze concentration and
`pH shifts (1). Carbohydrates, amino acids, glycerol, and
`polyethylene glycols (2) are all thought to act by their
`so-called preferential exclusion from the protein/water
`interface (3). This maintains native protein structure, pro-
`vided the cryoprotectants are present in sufficient quanti-
`ties (4). There is no evidence that amino acids alone (i.e.,
`not combined with carbohydrates) can also act as lyopro-
`tectants, which protect proteins against physical and
`chemical instabilities in the dried state after they are
`freeze-dried. Indeed, it is carbohydrates, especially disac-
`charides such as sucrose, maltose, and trehalose, which
`are the most effective lyoprotectants (5).
`It was found previously that vacuum-drying could be
`improved by the judicious combination of disaccharides
`with the crystallizing amino acid phenylalanine (Phe), to
`produce partially amorphous phases having residual
`moisture of ,1.5% (6). Proteins could be rendered stor-
`age stable at room temperature in these vacuum-dried
`sugar/amino acid glasses. The question then arose
`whether pure amino acids also form amorphous glasses
`of sufficiently low residual moisture and high glass tran-
`sition temperature when vacuum- or freeze-drying proce-
`dures are used. If so, do the amino acids act as lyoprotec-
`tants and can proteins be stabilized in such sugar-free
`systems? The literature indicates that glycine, for exam-
`ple, crystallizes during freeze-drying (7), its behavior be-
`ing dependent on pH and salt form. The literature did
`not, however, yield a comparative study of a wider spec-
`trum of amino acids regarding their behavior during
`freeze-drying. In this paper we identify those amino acids
`which form amorphous glasses during either freeze- or
`vacuum-drying procedures. The importance of salt forms
`for the glassy amino acids is a feature of this work, as is
`the use of mixed amino acid systems to reduce residual
`water content. The lyoprotective ability of the vacuum-
`dried amino acid glasses was investigated using lactate
`dehydrogenase (LDH) and recombinant human granulo-
`cyte colony-stimulating factor (rHG-CSF).
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`All of the (cid:108)-amino acids used were of analysis grade
`and obtained from either Merck (Darmstadt, Germany),
`
`Sigma (Munich, Germany), Clintec Salvia (Frankfurt,
`Germany), or Degussa (Frankfurt, Germany). Hydrochlo-
`ric and phosphoric acids were obtained from Merck. Wa-
`ter was double-distilled from an all-glass apparatus. LDH
`and rhG-CSF were used as described previously (6).
`
`Preparation and Physicochemical
`Characterization
`
`All solutions of the amino acids investigated were first
`filtered through a 0.22-m m membrane filter and filled into
`2 ml vials. These were then either freeze- or vacuum-
`dried using a freeze-dryer with 0.6 m2 shelf area
`(Scha¨fer & Hof, Lohra, Germany), as described previ-
`ously (6). Vacuum-drying was conducted for 24 hr at
`20(cid:176) C and down to 0.1 mbar. Each 2 ml vial contained
`1 ml of solution, the rubber stoppers being pressed into
`place at the end of the drying cycle after the chamber
`was flooded with dry air. The freeze-drying conditions
`were as follows: shelf temperature 225(cid:176) C, primary dry-
`ing at 0.1 mbar, secondary drying at shelf temperature
`rising to 10(cid:176) C and at 0.01 mbar.
`Karl Fischer (Mettler, Greifensee, Switzerland) titra-
`tion was used to determine the residual water content of
`each dried sample. Glass transition and crystallization
`temperatures were determined by differential scanning
`calorimetry (DSC 7, Perkin-Elmer, Munich, Germany).
`Samples (10–15 mg) in sealed Al pans were repeatedly
`cooled and heated at 10(cid:176) C/min in the range 250–150(cid:176) C.
`The crystallinity of the dried samples was examined us-
`ing wide-angle x-ray diffraction (PW 1720, 40 kW, Cu-
`Ka
`, l 5 0.15418 nm; Phillips, Kassel, Germany). Pow-
`dered samples (300 mg) were examined at 25 6 1(cid:176) C.
`The dried samples were also examined using scanning
`electron microscopy (SEM, DSM 902, Zeiss, Germany)
`after gold sputtering was performed in an Al sample
`holder.
`
`Stability of LDH and rhG-CSF in Dried
`Amino Acids
`
`Solutions of the amino acids of interest were prepared
`containing either 165 units LDH/ml or 0.35 mg rhG-CSF
`per 1 ml of solution. After vacuum-drying was per-
`formed, these samples were stored at various tempera-
`tures and examined periodically during up to 9 months
`storage. The stability of the rhG-CSF in the dried prod-
`ucts was assessed by determining of the amounts of mo-
`nomer and aggregated dimer using size exclusion chro-
`matography (SEC-HPLC). Each dry sample was first
`reconstituted in water and 20 m
`l was injected into an
`HPLC system (Shimadzu, Munich, Germany) with a re-
`
`-200-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Formulation of Proteins in Vacuum-Dried Glasses. II
`
`201
`
`frigerated autosampler (TM 717, Waters, Frankfurt, Ger-
`many). A TSK-Gel G 2000 SW (7.5 3 300 mm) column
`was used (Toso Haas) with detection at 214 nm (LC-GA,
`Shimadzu). The mobile phase was 0.1 M Na/K phos-
`phate buffer of pH 6.2, with a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min
`at room temperature. Under these conditions the retention
`time of the monomer was 14.5 min against an rhG-CSF
`external standard. With LDH a direct determination of
`enzymatic activity was possible. Potassium phosphate
`buffer (2.5 ml 0.1 M, pH 7.0), pyruvate (0.1 ml 0.02 M),
`and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)
`(0.05 ml 0.011 M) were mixed at 25(cid:176) C in a plastic cu-
`vette. To this 0.05 ml of the test LDH solution was added,
`and after the solution was mixed, the extinction was mea-
`sured at l 5 365 nm over a period of 5 min (552 UV/
`VIS photometer, Perkin-Elmer). The enzymatic activity
`(U/ml) was then calculated from the rate of change in
`extinction pro min, D E/D
`t, using
`U/ml 5 (D E/D
`t (cid:215) volume of solution)/
`(extinction coefficient (cid:215) pathlength
`(cid:215) volume of LDH solution)
`
`(1)
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Freeze-Drying of Amino Acids
`
`Only the four basic amino acids (lysine, arginine
`[Arg], histidine, and citrulline) showed conspicuous glass
`transitions after they were freeze-dried. For the example
`of (cid:108)-arginine, we found 1.2% w/w residual water and a
`glass transition at Tg 5 42(cid:176) C, followed by an exothermic
`crystallization peak at Tc 5 61(cid:176) C. This behavior is typi-
`cally seen with amorphous phases of, for example, carbo-
`hydrates (8). All of the other amino acids examined (Ta-
`ble 1) showed no detectable Tg or Tc and were apparently
`fully crystalline after being freeze-dried under the condi-
`tions used here. This finding underscores the frequently
`cited use of amino acids as crystalline bulking agents (2)
`[for example, glycine (6)]. Wide-angle x-ray diffraction
`reveals that the four basic amino acids were not, however,
`fully amorphous directly after being freeze-dried. The
`x-ray diffractogram of the freeze-dried (cid:108)-arginine [Fig.
`1(a)], for example, shows several crystalline reflections
`superimposed on the characteristic amorphous halo. The
`positions of these peaks are identical to those of anhy-
`drous crystalline (cid:108)-arginine (not shown). The degree of
`crystallinity in Fig. 1(a) is approximately 10%, which lies
`within the range quantifiable using standard methods of
`x-ray diffraction (8). Heating to above a sample’s Tc pro-
`duced spontaneous conversion to the fully crystalline
`form of the respective basic amino acid, as could be con-
`
`firmed from its x-ray diffractogram. Thus, under the stan-
`dard freeze-drying conditions used here, the four basic
`amino acids form amorphous solids, but with some crys-
`talline content.
`The addition of mineral acids to the (cid:108)-arginine base
`solution before freeze-drying was performed greatly al-
`tered the properties of the dried product. The amount of
`acid added was chosen to give the correct ratio of Arg
`base to acid required to form the corresponding salt. An
`equimolar solution of (cid:108)-arginine and HCl is thus assumed
`to form Arg Cl salt, and resulted in a more than doubled
`residual water content, and Tg was accordingly sharply
`reduced from 42 to 18(cid:176) C (Table 2). The use of a third
`molar part of H3PO4 in the (cid:108)-arginine solution (Arg PO4)
`also resulted in a higher residual water content than with
`the base, but there was a dramatic increase in Tg from 42
`to 93(cid:176) C (Table 2). In addition, the dried product of Arg
`PO4 was fully amorphous [Fig. 1(b)], as there were no
`signs of the crystalline reflections seen with Arg base
`[Fig. 1(a)]. The large increase in Tg is, therefore, indepen-
`dent of the change in residual water content, indicating
`clearly that Arg base and Arg PO4 have quite different
`abilities as glass-formers. Presumably, the higher water
`solubility of a salt compared with the base reduces nucle-
`ation tendencies during freezing. Indeed, salt forms of
`glycine were also found to crystallize more slowly than
`the base (7).
`
`Vacuum-Drying of Amino Acids
`
`In contrast to the primary drying stage of freeze-dry-
`ing, water loss during vacuum-drying is by evaporation.
`The properties of the dried product (state and residual
`water content) are determined essentially by the drying
`pressure, temperature, and time (9), as well as the volume
`to be dried in a specific container (6). Carbohydrates were
`found to form amorphous structures after being vacuum-
`dried under the same conditions used here, although they
`remained as rubbers, owing to high residual water content
`(6). The amino acids that crystallized here during freeze-
`drying also crystallized during vacuum-drying. The re-
`sidual water contents for the two processes (Table 1) do
`not differ within the experimental error expected using
`Karl Fischer titration of these small amounts of water
`(2% w/w residual water < 1 mg water). The vacuum-
`drying conditions fortuitously were good enough to give
`the same results as the freeze-drying conditions. In each
`case the x-ray diffractogram was identical to that of the
`fully crystalline amino acid, as with freeze-drying, and
`no Tg or Tc was discernable on the DSC scan (result not
`shown). Differences between freeze- and vacuum-drying
`only emerge with the four basic amino acids, which
`
`-201-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`202
`
`Mattern et al.
`
`Table 1
`
`Results of Freeze-Drying or Vacuum-Drying Aqueous Amino Acid Solutions
`
`After Freeze-Drying
`
`After Vacuum-Drying
`
`Residual Water
`Content (% w/w)
`
`1.1 6 0.1
`0.9 6 0.1
`0.7 6 0.2
`1.3 6 0.2
`0.8 6 0.3
`0.6 6 0.3
`1.1 6 0.2
`7.8 6 0.1
`0.9 6 0.1
`1.3 6 0.2
`2.8 6 0.1
`1.8 6 0.1
`0.7 6 0.1
`1.9 6 0.1
`0.9 6 0.2
`0.8 6 0.2
`
`DSC Behavior
`
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Tg 5 68 6 2.1
`Tg 5 42 6 2
`Tg 5 37 6 5.6
`Tg 5 64 6 0.7
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`
`Residual Water
`Content (% w/w)
`
`DSC Behavior
`
`0.8 6 0.2
`0.8 6 0.2
`0.6 6 0.2
`1.6 6 0.3
`1.1 6 0.3
`0.4 60.1
`0.5 6 0.2
`2.6 6 0.8
`0.8 6 0.2
`0.5 6 0.1
`0.8 6 0.2
`4.9 6 0.1
`1.9 6 0.4
`1.5 6 0.1
`1.6 6 0.4
`3.0 6 2.6
`
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`
`Amino Acid
`
`Glycine
`(cid:108)-Alanine
`(cid:108)-Valine
`(cid:108)-Leucine
`(cid:108)-Isoleucine
`(cid:108)-Serine
`(cid:108)-Threonine
`(cid:108)-Cysteine
`(cid:108)-Lysine
`(cid:108)-Arginine
`(cid:108)-Histidine
`(cid:108)-Citrulline
`(cid:108)-Proline
`(cid:108)-Phenylalanine
`(cid:108)-Methionine
`g -Aminobutyric acid
`
`In all cases a 0.24 M solution was used, with the exception of (cid:108)-histidine, (cid:108)-isoleucine, (cid:108)-leucine, and (cid:108)-methionine, which were prepared as 0.12
`M solutions because of their low solubility. During freeze-drying at a shelf temperature of 225(cid:176) C the (cid:108)-arginine and (cid:108)-lysine collapsed during
`primary drying, and were experiments repeated at 260(cid:176) C.
`
`formed freeze-dried amorphous solids, but fully crystal-
`line products after they were vacuum-dried (Table 1).
`The residual water contents, therefore, tend to be lower
`than those observed after the material is freeze-dried.
`Only (cid:108)-citrulline showed a higher residual water content
`in the crystalline state. The lower rate of water removal
`from the amino acid solution during vacuum-drying al-
`lowed sufficient time for complete nucleation and crystal
`growth.
`The addition of either HCl, H3PO4, or H2SO4 to the
`basic amino acid solutions to form the respective salts
`causes crystallization to be completely suppressed during
`vacuum-drying. The results, given in Table 2 for the ex-
`ample of (cid:108)-arginine, show fully amorphous solids that are
`rubbers at room temperature, owing to their high residual
`water contents. The x-ray diffractograms (not shown) are
`identical to that of the fully amorphous freeze-dried Arg
`PO4 shown in Fig. 1(b). As seen with freeze-drying, salt-
`formation reduces the tendency to nucleation; in this
`case, in the supersaturating amino acid solution during
`evaporative water loss. This effect is, however, salt spe-
`cific; neither nitrate nor acetate counter ions inhibited
`crystallization during vacuum-drying and the dried prod-
`
`ucts were fully crystalline with high residual water con-
`tents (Table 2).
`
`Vacuum-Drying of Phe/Arg Base Mixtures
`
`The addition of HCl, H2SO4, or H3PO4 inhibits crystal-
`lization of Arg during vacuum-drying. The dried prod-
`ucts were, however, all still in the rubbery state at room
`temperature, and as such, would certainly be unsuitable
`for stabilizing peptides or proteins (2). The reason for the
`rubbery products is as follows. Under the vacuum-drying
`conditions used here (0.1 mbar, 20(cid:176) C, 1 ml fill volume
`in 2 ml vial), the time required for the Arg/acid solution
`to reach the glass transition exceeds the 24-hr drying
`time. Of those factors that determine the time to the glass
`transition during vacuum-drying [temperature, pressure,
`nature and concentration of glass former, gradient of Tg
`(w), and surface area of evaporation (10)], it is the last-
`named that is responsible for this poor vacuum-drying
`behavior. As already found with carbohydrates, the small
`surface-to-volume ratio of the solution contained in the
`vial prevents sufficient water being lost after 24 hr at
`20(cid:176) C and 0.1 mbar to achieve the glassy state (6).
`
`-202-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Formulation of Proteins in Vacuum-Dried Glasses. II
`
`203
`
`A combination of the Arg base with Phe, both of
`which form fully crystalline products when vacuum-dried
`separately without acid (see Table 1), can, however,
`greatly reduce residual water content. Figure 2 shows the
`residual water content (wg) and Tg of the dried Phe/Arg
`mixtures as a function of increasing molar proportion of
`Phe in the Arg. Recall that vacuum-dried Arg base is fully
`crystalline with a residual water content of ,1% (Table
`1). The addition of 1 mole-part Phe to 7 mole-parts Arg
`yields a clearly discernable glass transition at approxi-
`mately 2(cid:176) C (Fig. 2), indicating a change away from fully
`crystalline toward amorphous character. This is con-
`firmed by the x-ray diffractogram for this mixture in Fig.
`3(a), where crystalline peaks, identifiable from their an-
`gular positions as Arg and not Phe, lie superimposed on
`an amorphous halo. This small proportion of added Phe
`has, therefore, partially suppressed the crystallization of
`the Arg during vacuum-drying. Consequently, wg jumps
`from ,1% for pure fully crystalline Arg to approxi-
`mately 12% for this partially amorphous product (Fig.
`2), which as explained above cannot then be effectively
`vacuum-dried under the conditions used. Further increase
`in the mole fraction of Phe in the mixture produces, how-
`ever, remarkable changes in wg and Tg. Figure 2 shows
`how wg then decreases, at first accompanied by only a
`marginal increase in Tg. Thus, 1 mole-part Phe to 5 mole-
`parts Arg is still a rubbery solid at room temperature (Tg
`5 2(cid:176) C), but is fully amorphous [Fig. 3(b)]. The Phe com-
`pletely suppresses crystallization of the Arg at and above
`this mole fraction. With 1 mole-part Phe to 2 mole-parts
`Arg, however, new crystallization peaks emerge from the
`amorphous halo [Fig. 3(c)], identifiable as being those of
`crystalline Phe. This incipient crystallization of Phe
`within the amorphous Arg leads to a change in behavior
`of the vacuum-dried Phe/Arg product. Thus, further in-
`
`Figure 1. Wide-angle x-ray diffractograms of freeze-dried
`amino acids taken at 25(cid:176) C. (a) (cid:108)-Arg; (b) (cid:108)-Arg (0.24 M) 1
`H3PO4 (0.12 M).
`
`Table 2
`
`Influence of Counter Ions on the Freeze-Drying or Vacuum-Drying Behavior of (cid:108)-Arginine
`
`After Freeze-Drying
`
`After Vacuum-Drying
`
`Arginine/Counter Ion
`
`(cid:108)-Arg base (0.24 M)
`(cid:108)-Arg (0.24 M) 1 HCl (0.24 M)
`(cid:108)-Arg (0.24 M) 1 H3PO4 (0.12 M)
`(cid:108)-Arg (0.24 M) 1 H2SO4 (0.12 M)
`(cid:108)-Arg (0.24 M) 1 HNO3 (0.24 M)
`(cid:108)-Arg (0.24 M) 1 Ch3COOH (0.24 M)
`
`Drying conditions were as in Table 1, n 5 3.
`
`Residual Water
`Content (% w/w)
`
`1.3 6 0.2
`3.5 6 0.18
`2.2 6 0.07
`
`Tg
`((cid:176) C)
`
`42 6 2
`18 6 0.2
`93 6 1
`
`Residual Water
`Content (% w/w)
`
`0.5 6 0.1
`6.5 6 0.1
`3.3 6 0.2
`3.2 6 0.3
`2.7 6 0.1
`11.1 6 0.8
`
`Tg
`((cid:176) C)
`
`Crystalline
`3.5 6 0.3
`5.2 6 0.6
`6.7 6 0.3
`Crystalline
`Crystalline
`
`-203-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`204
`
`Mattern et al.
`
`Figure 2. Residual water content (s) and glass transition temperature (n) of vacuum-dried mixtures of Phe and Arg. In all cases,
`a 0.24 M solution of amino acid in water was vacuum-dried for 24 hr at 20(cid:176) C and down to 0.1 mbar. Fill volume was 1 ml in a
`2-ml vial.
`
`Figure 3. Wide-angle x-ray diffractograms of vacuum-dried Phe/Arg mixtures taken at 25(cid:176) C. (a) Phe/Arg (1:7); (b) Phe/Arg (1:
`5); (c) Phe/Arg (1:2); (d) Phe/Arg (1:1). The drying conditions are given in Fig. 2.
`
`-204-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Formulation of Proteins in Vacuum-Dried Glasses. II
`
`205
`
`crease up to equimolar parts (1:1) Phe and Arg produces
`a precipitous fall in wg from 10% to approximately 2%,
`with a corresponding jump in Tg from 2(cid:176) C up to 60(cid:176) C
`(Fig. 2). Simultaneously, the degree of Phe crystallinity
`of the system increases [Fig. 3(d)]. Further increase in
`the molar proportion of Phe tends to increase wg slightly,
`accompanied by a slight decrease in Tg (Fig. 2). The crys-
`talline peaks in the x-ray diffractogram become larger
`and the pattern resembles more that of pure Phe (result
`not shown).
`It is already known that Phe can form a crystalline
`network within vacuum-dried carbohydrates (6). The
`same occurs with the Phe/Arg mixtures. In this case,
`however, the crystallization of Arg is suppressed by the
`addition of small amounts of Phe, which in increasing
`concentrations, itself crystallizes out within the amor-
`phous Arg. This is clearly seen in the SEM of the vac-
`uum-dried Phe/Arg (2:1) mixture shown in Fig. 4. At
`low magnification only a monolithic slab of dried product
`is evident, some 20 m m thick. Higher magnification re-
`veals that the cake is, however, highly porous and is com-
`posed of a network of crystallized Phe, which is coated
`with a thin pellicle of the amorphous Arg. The small layer
`thickness of the Arg pellicle (,2 m m) and its large sur-
`face-to-volume ratio result in sufficient loss of water un-
`der the vacuum-drying conditions used to reach and ex-
`ceed the glass transition after 24 hr of drying time. The
`result is a mixed amorphous/crystalline product of low
`wg and high Tg. The latter clearly characterizes unambig-
`uously the glassy state of the Arg. More care is needed
`when considering wg, however, because the moisture may
`not be homogeneously dispersed in the mixed amor-
`phous/crystalline products. The state of these systems
`will be expected to be only metastable. The presence of
`a counter ion to the arginine base is still important. HCl
`has no effect (Table 3), but with H3PO4, Tg is increased
`to .110(cid:176) C without change in the residual water content
`of approximately 1%. The particular ability of H3PO4 to
`increase the Tg of the basic amino acids is currently the
`subject of further, more detailed experiments.
`
`Stability of LDH in Phe/Arg/H3PO4
`
`Because the binary amino acid mixtures are partly
`amorphous and partly crystalline, it is uncertain if a sub-
`stantial protein lyoprotection can be expected. The initial
`loss in LDH activity occurring during the vacuum-drying
`process (process stability) of the unprotected bulk en-
`zyme is approximately 40% (Fig. 5). This is reduced to
`approximately 20% loss with the Phe/Arg/H3PO4 (1:1:
`1) formulation (Fig. 5), showing that the binary amino
`
`Figure 4. SEMs of vacuum-dried Phe/Arg (2:1). (a) Magni-
`fication 5003; (b) magnification 50003. The vacuum-drying
`conditions are given in Fig. 2. At this high molar proportion of
`Phe, the crystallization of the Phe is clearly evident.
`
`-205-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`206
`
`Mattern et al.
`
`Vacuum-Drying of Phe/Arg Mixtures at Molar Proportion of (1:1) with Mineral Acids
`
`Table 3
`
`Formulation
`
`Arg (0.24 M) 1 Phe (0.24 M)
`Arg (0.24 M) 1 Phe (0.24 M) 1 HCl (0.24 M)
`Arg (0.24 M) 1 Phe (0.24 M) 1 H3PO4 (0.12 M)
`
`Drying conditions were as in Table 1, n 5 3.
`
`Residual Water
`Content (% w/w)
`
`1.1 6 0.1
`1.0 6 0.1
`1.1 6 0.2
`
`Tg ((cid:176) C)
`63 6 0.4
`70 6 1.2
`113 6 3
`
`acid formulation can partly protect the enzyme during
`vacuum-drying at 20(cid:176) C. Franks reported that LDH could
`be vacuum-dried with a sucrose copolymer without any
`loss of activity (10). The higher temperature used for vac-
`uum-drying (up to 40(cid:176) C) and the smaller volumes used
`(250 m
`l) allowed, however, more rapid attainment of the
`glass transition than under the conditions used here, and
`hence less activity loss was observed during passage
`through the rubbery state. The unprotected LDH also
`shows rapid, temperature-dependent loss of activity dur-
`ing storage (Fig. 5).
`The storage stability of LDH in the binary amino acid
`mixture under normal storage conditions (3(cid:176) C) as well
`as at elevated temperatures (40 and 60(cid:176) C) was examined.
`Clearly, the modes or rates of degradation (in this case,
`aggregation of the LDH) may be quite different at these
`higher temperatures. Nonetheless, we were interested in
`the ability of the formulations to protect proteins even
`under stress conditions. The rate of activity loss of LDH
`is lower in the Phe/Arg/H3PO4 (1:1:1) than with the
`bulk enzyme, although activity still decreases by some
`20% over 26 weeks for the example of 40(cid:176) C. The loss
`in enzymatic activity is temperature-dependent in the
`range 3–60(cid:176) C examined here. Thus, despite a Tg of
`.110(cid:176) C for this binary amino acid formulation (Table
`3), the LDH shows substantial loss of activity on storage
`at temperatures more than 50(cid:176) C below Tg. At the Tg of
`vacuum-dried material, a transition in macroscopic prop-
`erties occurs (it becomes rubbery), as well as a change to
`greater molecular mobility. The latter has been associated
`with a shift in degradation kinetics from a slower model
`(Arrhenius) to a faster model (Williams–Landel–Ferry
`[WLF]) (11,12). At temperatures below Tg, therefore,
`degradation rates will be a function of temperature and
`should follow the slower kinetic model. This temperature
`dependence is, however, made more complicated by an
`increase in residual water content of the formulation on
`storage. After 26 weeks of storage the water contents in-
`
`creased from initially 1.1% (see Table 3) to 1.7% at 3(cid:176) C,
`2.9% at 40(cid:176) C, and 3.2% at 60(cid:176) C storage temperatures.
`Correspondingly, Tg decreased from initially 113 to 92(cid:176) C
`at 3(cid:176) C, 80(cid:176) C at 40(cid:176) C, and 78(cid:176) C at 60(cid:176) C storage tempera-
`tures. These changes are a result of sorbed moisture re-
`leased from the stoppers of the vials, which is taken up
`by the dried product. Clearly, the difference (Tg 2 T) is
`reduced on storage, but always remains positive. Because
`the conditions in the vials were continually changing dur-
`ing storage, a closer analysis of the kinetics and its rela-
`tion to (Tg 2 T) is prohibited. The storage stability of
`LDH in the sugar-free amino acid formulation is, how-
`ever, quantitatively identical to that in a vacuum-dried
`maltose/Phe (5:1) formulation (6).
`
`Figure 5. Process and storage stability of LDH, determined
`by enzymatic activity assay: bulk LDH, vacuum-dried, stored
`at 3(cid:176) C (.), 21(cid:176) C (r), and 40(cid:176) C (1); Phe/Arg/H3PO4 (1:1:
`0.5) LDH formulation, vacuum-dried, stored at 3(cid:176) C (n), 40(cid:176) C
`(s), and 60(cid:176) C (n).
`
`-206-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Formulation of Proteins in Vacuum-Dried Glasses. II
`
`207
`
`Stability of rhG-CSF in Phe/Arg HCl
`
`To obtain more information about the effect of mois-
`ture uptake on protein stability in the region of the formu-
`lation’s Tg, we vacuum-dried rhG-CSF in the Phe/Arg/
`HCl (1:1:1) mixture. This mixture has a lower Tg than
`that with H3PO4 of just 70(cid:176) C at 1% residual water (Table
`3). Unprotected rhG-CSF bulk shows 99.6% intact mono-
`mer immediately after the vacuum-drying process. This
`value is maintained with the Phe/Arg/HCl (1:1:1) for-
`mulation [Fig. 6(a)]. Subsequent storage stability is
`strongly dependent on temperature. Although no more
`than 20% monomer is lost after 39 weeks of storage at
`up to 40(cid:176) C, at 60(cid:176) C and above more than 80% loss in
`
`monomer is evident during the first 12 weeks. As men-
`tioned above, the modes and rates of degradation may be
`quite changed at these high stress temperatures. As seen
`with LDH in the Phe/Arg/H3PO4 glass, this protein insta-
`bility at storage temperatures below Tg is complicated by
`uptake of moisture into the glass from the vial stopper.
`The already low Tg of the Phe/Arg/HCl glass of 70(cid:176) C
`causes, however, more dramatic temperature-dependent
`changes in the state of the glass than seen with Phe/Arg/
`H3PO4. Thus, after 39 weeks of storage at 3(cid:176) C the initial
`residual water content of 1.0% (Table 3) increases to
`2.4%; although Tg consequently decreases to 66(cid:176) C, there
`is no loss of rhG-CSF monomer up to 39 weeks [Fig.
`6(a)]. The higher the storage temperature, the greater is
`
`Figure 6.
`(a) Process and storage stability of rhG-CSF in Phe/Arg/HCl (1:1:1), determined by size exclusion chromatography,
`after vacuum-drying and subsequent storage at 3(cid:176) C (h), 21(cid:176) C (d), 30(cid:176) C (n), 40(cid:176) C (.), 60(cid:176) C (r), and 80(cid:176) C (1). (b) Comparison
`of stabilizing action of Phe/Arg plus HCl or H3PO4 formulations at 3 and 80(cid:176) C.
`
`-207-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`208
`
`Mattern et al.
`
`the increase in water content during storage, until at 40(cid:176) C
`we find 3.9% water, a Tg of only 40(cid:176) C, and a loss of 20%
`rhG-CSF over 39 weeks. It is, therefore, not possible to
`distinguish between the destabilizing effects of higher
`storage temperature and accelerated moisture uptake.
`The x-ray diffractograms of all systems stored at up
`to 40(cid:176) C remained unchanged. At the higher storage tem-
`peratures (60 and 80(cid:176) C) the behavior is, however, quite
`different; after 39 weeks of storage, both systems had
`changed to fully crystalline (determined by x-ray diffrac-
`tion) and no Tg was detectable using DSC, although the
`water content was unchanged. This amorphous to crystal-
`line change is a typical phenomenon (see ref. 13 for su-
`crose and lactose) and runs parallel to the drastic decrease
`in protein stability between 40 and 60(cid:176) C in Fig. 6(a). Wa-
`ter uptake depresses Tg below the storage temperature,
`initiating full crystallization of the amino acids. The fully
`crystalline formulation loses its ability to stabilize pro-
`teins, as evident in Fig. 6(a).
`The general importance of a high Tg for storage stabil-
`ity of the rhG-CSF is clearly illustrated by the compari-
`son of the Phe/Arg/HCl and Phe/Arg/H3PO4 formula-
`tions in Fig. 6(b). Recall that both formulations have
`approximately 1% residual water directly after being vac-
`uum-dried, but greatly different Tg values of 70 and
`113(cid:176) C, respectively. With both formulations there is no
`loss of rhG-CSF monomer after 39 weeks of storage at
`3(cid:176) C. At 80(cid:176) C, however, rhG-CSF aggregation is much
`less in Phe/Arg/H3PO4 than in Phe/Arg/HCl, the latter
`being completely inactivated after just 4 weeks. Although
`protein stability at such high temperatures cannot be com-
`pared with that at ambient temperatures, the improved
`stabilizing effect of the PO4 system is clearly evident.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`This study shows that most amino acids crystallize
`during freeze-drying, and therefore are in principle suit-
`able as bulking agents. It is possible, however, to obtain
`amorphous products by either freeze- or vacuum-drying
`the phosphate or chloride salts of the basic amino acids.
`With freeze-drying, optimization of the process condi-
`tions is necessary to reduce the somewhat high residual
`moisture contents obtained here. This procedure appears
`to be particularly promising for phosphate salts, which
`give glasses of notably high Tg. The vacuum-drying pro-
`cedure could only be improved by using a binary amino
`acid mixture, yielding products of high Tg and low wg.
`Because the products are mixed amorphous/crystalline
`
`structures, the question of their metastability needs to be
`considered. Despite this, these sugar-free amino acid for-
`mulations act as lyoprotectants for both LDH and rhG-
`CSF during storage. Despite the low pressure used during
`secondary drying (0.01 mbar), the stoppers retained re-
`sidu

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket