throbber
Natural Product
`Chemistry
`
`Proceedings
`of the First International Symposium
`and Pakistan-US. Binational Workshop,
`Karachi, Pakistan
`
`Edited by
`Atta—ur-Rahman
`
`Springer-Verlag
`Berlin Heidelberg NewYork
`London Paris Tokyo
`
`'
`
`MA1A Exhibit 1023
`MAIA V.BRACCO
`IPR PETITION
`
`
`
`
`MAIA Exhibit 1023
`MAIA V. BRACCO
`IPR PETITION
`
`

`

`Professor ATTA-UR—RAHMAN
`
`H.E.J. Research Institute of Chemistry
`University of Karachi
`Karachi-32, Pakistan
`
`With 142 Figures and Numerous Schemes
`
`ISBN-13: 978-3-642-71427-6
`DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-71425-2
`
`e-ISBN-13: 978-3-642-71425-2
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. International Symposium and Paki—
`stan-US. Binational Workshop on Natural Product Chemistry (1st : 1984 : Karachi, Paki-
`stan). Natural product chemistry. “The first International Symposium and Pakistan-US.
`Binational Workshop on Natural Product Chemistry
`February 1984”—Pref. Includes
`index.
`1. Natural products—Congresses.
`I. Rahman, Atta-ur-, 1942-
`.
`11. Title.
`QD415.A1147
`1984
`547.7
`86-20420.
`
`This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the
`material is concerned, specifically those of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations,
`broadcasting, reproduction by photocopying machine or similar means, and storage in data
`banks. Under § 54 of the German Copyright Law, where copies are made for other than
`private use, a fee is payable to “Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort”, Munich.
`
`© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986
`Softcover reprint of the hardcover lst edition 1986.
`
`The use of registered names trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the
`absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective
`laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
`
`Offsetprinting: Druckhaus Beltz, Hemsbach/Bergstr.
`
`2131/3130—543210
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Atta-ur-Rahman (ed.), Natural Product Chemistry
`© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986
`
`-255-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`256
`
`The main structural characteristics of the gastrin—cholecysto—
`
`kinin family of peptide hormones are:
`
`1)
`
`the common C—terminal
`
`tetrapeptide amide sequence Trp—Met—Asp—Phe-NH2 which already
`
`in early structure—function studies on gastrin was recognized
`
`as the minimum fragment with physiological activity although
`
`at low potency, and thus as a kind of active center of the hor—
`
`mone (1);
`
`2)
`
`the tyrosine—O—sulfate residue which for chole-
`
`cystokinin (CCK) represents an essential structural feature for
`
`full hormonal expression, whereas for the gastrins its role has
`
`not yet been identified; they are isolated in the nonsulfated
`
`form I as well as in the sulfated form II (2,3) and no signifi—
`
`cant differences in their physiological actions have been de—
`
`tected so far;
`
`3)
`
`the complex size-heterogeneity as resulting
`
`from the posttranslation processing of their precursor mole-
`
`sequence
`
`shades! active
`
`Fig. 1. Primary structures of A) human gastrins (HG) and B)
`
`porcine cholecystokinins. Arrows indicate enzymatic
`
`cleavages of the prohormonal molecules with production
`
`of gastrins and cholecystokinins of decreasing Chain—
`
`length. The C-terminal amides result from enzymatic
`
`processing of glycine-extended forms
`
`-256-
`
`-256-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`257
`
`cules (Fig. 1)
`
`(4). To better understand the structural bases
`
`for the biological actions of this class of hormones and to pos—
`
`sibly identify the physiological significance of the observed
`
`heterogeneity both in respect to sulfation and extension at the
`
`N—termini, extensive synthetic studies have been performed in
`
`the last years in our laboratory (5 -15). Aim of these inten—
`
`sive efforts was
`
`i)
`
`to obtain the various components of this
`
`class of hormones at the highest possible degree of purity for
`
`structure-function studies
`
`ii) to identify fully active ana—
`
`logs stable on storage and handling as needed for physiological
`
`and clinical studies, and finally iii) to synthetize deriva-
`
`tives well suited for an efficient improvement of the immuno—
`
`logical methods necessary for a reliable quantitative and selec-
`
`tive evaluation of the different components both when circula-
`
`ting in the plasma and in the tissue of their biosynthesis. Our
`
`contributions in the field are reviewed in the following:
`
`Synthesis of Gastrins
`
`The main difficulties encountered in the synthesis of gastrin
`
`and CCK related peptides derive from those structural elements
`
`which are essential for the biological activity and thus, di—
`
`rectly involved in the mechanism of action of this class of hor—
`
`mones, i.e.
`
`from the thioether function of methionine,
`
`the in—
`
`dole side—chain function of tryptophan and the tyrosine—O-sul—
`
`fate moiety. This sequence—dependent enhanced reactivity par-
`
`ticularly of the methionine and tryptophan residue towards
`
`oxidants and electrophiles as well as the instability of the
`
`sulfate—ester function has represented for years a challenge
`
`for the peptide chemist.
`
`
`Oxidation of methionine: The pronounced tendency of the
`
`methionine residues in the gastrins and CCK—peptides to oxi-
`
`dation to the corresponding S—oxide derivatives with concomi—
`
`tant loss of activity (16 —17)
`
`implies careful avoidance of
`
`traces of oxidants, e.g. peroxides and heavy metals along the
`
`various steps of synthesis and purification as well as of air—
`
`oxygen to prevent desactivation. Even if reduction of S-oxides
`
`with thiols is possible (18), handling of these peptides for
`
`in Vitro and in vivo assays becomes delicate.
`
`-257-
`
`-257-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`258
`
`Additionally the lability of the tyrosine-O—sulfate ester
`
`prevents an "a posteriori reduction" of S-oxide derivatives
`
`by thiols (15). Basing on first indications of Morley (l7),
`
`Kenner et al.
`
`(19) and Wfinsch et al.
`
`(5 - 6) both independently
`
`revealed the possibility to replace the methionine residue
`
`in the gastrins by the branched aliphatic side-chain of
`
`leucine with retainment of full biological activity. Subsequent
`
`substitutions of methionine by norleucine or its oxa-analogue
`
`methoxinine proved to be equally efficient
`
`(20).
`
`The related
`
`analogs were equipotent to the parent methionine— hormone in
`
`stimulating gastric acid secretion.
`
`Oxidative degradation of tryptophan: Since the first studies
`
`on tryptOphan—containing peptides it is known that the indole
`
`function undergoes facile oxidation with production of
`
`usually colored complex mixtures consisting of components
`
`which are not yet studied in detail. This oxidative
`
`degradation occurs in pronounced manner in acid solutions,
`
`e.g. as needed in acidolytic deprotection steps.
`
`It has
`
`been, however, observed that addition of phenols to free
`
`the acid mixtures from halogens as well as operating in inert
`
`atmosphere such as under argon or adding antioxidants, e.g.
`
`diethylphosphite or preferentially thiols, constitute effi-
`
`cients methods to prevent or at least to minimize the oxi—
`
`dative destruction of tryptophan residues.
`
`Alkylation of tryptophan: A more serious side reaction at the
`
`level of tryptophan residues was detected in our laboratory
`
`during the synthetic work on gastrins, i.e.
`
`the alkylation
`
`of the indole ring as generated in the acidolytic removal
`
`of protecting groups. First indications of a possible chemical
`
`modification of the indole group derived from the synthetic
`
`studies on glucagon (21) and then, particularly on 15—leucine—
`
`human little gastrin-I (6).
`
`An exact identification of the side products and thus, of the
`
`nature of the side reaction which had occurred, was difficult
`
`because of the presence of two tryptophan residues in the
`
`little gastrin molecule. We
`
`then succeeded to identify this
`
`side reaction during the synthesis of a leucine-analogue of
`
`-258-
`
`-258-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`259
`
`minigastrin-I(10)initially prOposed to correspond to the
`
`C-terminal tridecapeptide amide of little gastrin-I(22).
`
`Upon removal of the protecting groups on tert-butanol basis
`
`by exposure to trifluoroacetic acid and partition chromato-
`
`graphy of the resulting crude product on Sephadex G—25,
`main side fraction was identified as 10—Nin-tert-butyl—
`
`the
`
`tryptophan-11—leucine-minigastrin—I by mass- and nmr-
`
`spectroscopy of the C-terminal chymotryptic fragment.
`
`Subsequently in collaboration with Kisfaludy and associates,
`
`studies on model compounds allowed the characterization of
`
`the various alkylation products of the indokering formed in
`
`the acidolytic cleavage of protecting groups on tert-butanol
`basis. Besides the Nin-tert-butyl—derivative, additionally
`
`mono-C-tert—butyl-, poly-C-tert-butyl- and poly—C—, N-tert-
`
`butyl—derivatives are produced whereby the extent of such
`
`alkylations and the distribution pattern of the various
`
`substitutions at the indokafunction were found to strongly
`
`depend on the acids used, on time and temperature (23). To
`
`possibly minimize this deleterious side reaction which causes
`
`remarkable loss
`
`of product,
`
`the use of scavangers, e.g.
`
`indole derivatives, ethers and thioethers as well as a
`
`series of thiols and their mixtures, have carefully been
`
`examined by extensive comparative studies. All efforts to
`
`entirely suppress indole alkylation failed, even if
`
`1,2—ethanedithiole was found to efficiently reduce the rate
`
`of this side reaction as shown in Fig.
`
`2
`
`(11).
`
`Fortunately various analytical methods e.g.
`
`1 H-nmr, tlc,
`
`hplc, were found to be sufficiently sensitive to permit
`
`detection and quantitative monitoring of the extent of such a
`
`side reaction,
`
`thus remarkably facilitating the purification
`
`processes.
`
`In this context noteworthy is the observation
`
`that the rate of alkylation of the indole function strongly
`
`depends on the chemical environment of the tryptophan
`
`residue. While during the synthesis of gastrins and gastrin
`
`analogs as well as gastrin—related peptides tert-butyl—
`
`tryptophan-derivatives have been detected in extents up to
`
`15 % even applying efficient scavangers (11), no alkylation
`
`-259-
`
`-259-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`260
`
`A260
`
`28min
`
`A290
`
`O
`
`8
`
`12
`
`16
`
`20
`
`24
`
`Fig. 2.
`
`lec of crude 1-des-tryptophan, 11-leucine-minigastrin-I
`
`as resulting from exposure of the fully protected
`tridecapeptide derivative Boc-Leu—[Glu(OBut )]5-A1a-
`Tyr(But ) -Gly-Trp-Leu-Asp(OBut)--Phe—NH2 to I)
`trifluoroacetic acid/anisole, 10:1 and II)
`
`trifluoro—
`
`acetic acid/anisole/1,2-ethanedithiol, 10:1:0.25.
`
`Chromatographic conditions: u-Bondapak C 18
`
`(30 x 0.4 cm); eluents: A) 0.1 M sodium phosphate,
`
`pH 5.4;
`
`B) acetonitrile/eluent A, 45:55;
`
`linear
`
`gradient of 35 % B to 80 % B in 30 min;
`
`flow rate:
`
`1.7 ml/min
`
`of the tryptOphan residue was observed upon acidolytic
`
`removal of tert—butanol and 1—adamantanol derived protecting
`
`groups from fully protected somatostatin (24). Consequently,
`
`this sequence-dependent reactivity to electrophiles strongly
`
`questions the general efficacy of acidolytic deprotection
`
`procedures devised on the basis of model studies with simple
`
`tryptophan-compounds.
`
`Racemization:
`
`An additional serious difficulty encountered
`
`in the synthesis of gastrins is related to the last fragment
`
`condensation step, i.e. assembly of the N—terminal pentapeptide
`Pyr-Gly—Pro-Trp-Leu-OH with H—[Glu(OBut)]5-Ala-Tyr(But)-Gly—
`
`-260-
`
`-260-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`2m
`
`Trp~X—Asp(OBut)—Phe-NH2 via DCC/HONSu even using a 3-to 4-fold
`excess of the carboxyl component (5). The
`low acylation rate
`
`induced us to a detailed investigation (11) of various known
`
`coupling methods (Table I).
`
`With benzotriazole as additive the acylation rate was sensibly
`
`enhanced; concomitantly quantitative racemization of the
`
`C—terminal
`
`leucine residue occurred (25). This coupling procedure
`
`proposed by Konig and Geiger
`
`(26) has widely been used and it is
`
`surprising that its negative side effects hmxanot been recognized
`
`earlier. The danger of related remarkable racemization rates
`
`has been confirmed by Sieber et al.
`
`in the synthesis of insulin
`
`(27) and by us in the synthesis of secretin (28) and PHI
`
`(29).
`
`The experiments listed in Table I indicate as only
`
`alternative to the DCC/HONSu method (30)
`
`the use of
`
`2-morpholinoethylisocyanide in presence of N-hydroxysuccinimide
`
`(31).
`
`These above summarized meticulous studies on the observed side
`
`reactions as well as the experiences gained in parallel
`
`synthetic studies on other gastrointestinal hormones allowed
`
`an efficient feedback for an optimization of the synthetic routes
`
`to gastrins-I (11)
`
`(Fig. 3) and gastrin-I-related peptides (12)
`
`(Fig. 4).
`
`The desired peptides became accessible at a
`
`high degree of purity as judged by thin—layer chromatography
`
`under various conditions, high pressure liquid chromatography
`
`in optimized conditions, electrophoresis, uv- and nmr—
`
`spectroscopy, amino acid analyses of the acid and enzymatic
`
`hydrolysates as well as by chiral analysis according to the
`
`method of Bayer and associates (32).
`
`Synthesis of tyrosine-O-sulfate peptides
`
`As mentioned initially the closely related gut hormones CCK
`
`and gastrin-II share as common characteristic a tyrosine-O-sulfate
`
`residue, whereby for latter hormone the nonsulfated form-I has
`
`also been isolated. The question arises of whether circulating
`
`in plasma the gastrins are sulfated and desulfation takes
`
`place during isolation or of whether both the sulfated and
`
`nonsulfated gastrins constitute native components. To shed
`
`light on this undoubtedly important question synthetic
`
`-261-
`
`-261-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`mnrurammzumzmuAsmuovammuoHZIQuBumaw:AsmuvawanmfimummAsmuovsawHIstumHeuoumI>Hw|H>mum
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`”brim“mmznmgm-AsmpovmmmlwazumuaumawuAsmuvumenma<umflAsmuovsHuH-m+Hm-F_acuswqumuenoumlmauuummlm
`
`
`
`Hmagma
`
`
`
`
`
`”moMODUOHQGUSHUCHucmucooHHOE\HOEHOHumu
`
`262
`
`
`
`AmuganuflwaNV
`
`
`
`0meterCwmpmu“cflaom:mzom\H¢zmAm
`
`
`
`mHommelormmmuknvm0avIumom\ooomas
`
`AmucmEHummxmmy
`
`wuommlmpcmmu“:¢m0avl:mzom\uuomAN
`
`Ampnmhwummxwmv
`
`
`
`
`
`wsmqiowHurloamcofluflocouCOfiuommHcoaum>fiuomvosumfiHurlmw\Hmlra
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-262-
`
`-262-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`NmZImnm-Ammuovmm¢nuw2nmnaumHoI.:mu.u»eumamsmmz.
`
`
`
`DmZOE\UUQ
`
`mmzlmnmlAmuovmmdlumzzm+mOtmuelmHolAsmuvuwBlmadlmmz
`
`
`
`
`
`NmZImsm:Asmuovmm<qumzumnaumaolAsmuvawexma<ImAnmpo.:Houlzmqlmasuonmlmaunumm
`
`Hoflnuflwosmgpmlm~"\mfiomflcm\mooommo
`
`
`
`wnmmumoumEOHnocofl#fiuumm
`
`NmZImzmlmmdlumzlmualmawinwelmHfilmfinaowIDGQIQHBloumlhaoluhm
`
`ofloccflamgumaam\aum
`
`mmZuonmnAsmpovmm<uumzumuaumauuAsmuvaaeuma¢um+moanAsmuovsfiuHummz
`
`
`
`szom\UUQ
`
`
`
`mmZImnmuAsmuovmmgnpmzsmuenwawnAsmuvnmaswa<Immamuovsfiwgum+mo:nmq:mae-oumumHulumm
`
`
`
`szom\00D
`
`263
`
`waovnflawzumfiim\aom
`
`N
`
`mZImnm-AsmuOVQmmnumz-auaanwnAnmuvamalma¢smfiAnmuovsflwulmmz
`
`-263-
`
`
`
`
`
`HICHH#mmmmaufiflaSwan:0»munchOflumfluc>m.m.wflm
`
`
`
`
`
`-263-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`264
`
`Z-Glu(OBu’)-Ala-Tyr(Bu’)-Gly-OH[10-13] + H-Trp-Nle-Asp(OBu’)—Phe-NH2 [Nle15][l4-17b]
`
`DCC/HONSu
`
`Z-Glu(OBu')~Ala-Tyr(Bu')-Gly-Trp-Nle-Asp(0BuU-Phe—NH; [N181 5 n 10—17“
`
`Hde
`
`Z-[Glu(OBu‘)|4-OH[6-—9] + H-Glu(OBu’)—Ala-Tyr(Bu’)-Gly-Trp-Nle-Asp(0Bu’)-Phe-NH2 [Niel Sum—171)]
`
`DCC/HONSu
`
`Z-[Glu(OBu’)ls-Ala-Tyr(Bu’)-Gly-Trp—Nle-Asp(OBu’)-Phe-NHz [Nlel 5 "6—1721
`
`Hz/Pd
`
`l:VGlu-Gly-Pro-l'rp-Leu-OHl1—5| + H-[Glu(0Bu')15-Ala-Tyr(Bu’)-Gly-Trp—Nle-Asp(OBu’)-Phe-NH2 [Nle15II6—l7b]
`
`DCC/HONSu
`
`Qlu-Gly-Pro-Trp-Leu-[Glu(OBu’)|5-AIa-Tyr(Bu’)-GIy-Trp-Nle-Asp(OBu’)-Phe-NH2 [Nlel 5 H l ——1 7a]
`
`CFacozfl/anisole/ 1 , 2-ethanedithiol
`partition-chromatography
`
`Q1u-Gly-Pro-Trp-Lcu-Glu-Glu-Glu~Glu-Glu-Alu-Tyr-Gly-Trp-Nlc—Asp-Phc-Nl12
`
`[Nlc'l 5 || | ‘ 17b |
`
`Fig. 4. Synthetic route to 15-norleucine—human little
`
`gastrin-I. The identical synthetic scheme was
`
`followed for the preparation of the 15-leucine-
`
`and 15—methoxinine-analog
`
`sulfated gastrins should be accessible.So far,
`
`the synthesis
`
`of sulfated gastrins has not been achieved; previous attempts
`
`in Kenner's laboratory (33) based on direct sulfation of
`
`gastrin using pyridine/SO3 failed. Surprisingly more success
`was obtained with this method for the preparation of CCK-
`
`peptides upon optimization of the reaction conditions and
`
`extensive purification of the final compounds (34 — 35).
`
`Nonetheless several side reactions such as nuclear sulfonation
`
`of the tyrosine side-chain could not be prevented;
`
`the extent
`
`of sulfonation was found to strongly depend on sulfating
`
`agents used, on the operating conditions and on the chemical
`
`-264-
`
`-264-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`265
`
`environment of the tyrosyl residue (36). The mentioned
`
`difficulties compelled us to devise a new synthetic route
`
`to tyrosine—O—sulfate-peptides based on the direct use of
`
`suitable derivatives of tyrosine-Onsulfate. This key inter-
`
`mediate was obtained by sulfation of Z—Tyr-OH with pyridine/
`
`803 followed by its isolation as barium salt. The homogeneity
`of this starting material
`is easily assessed by chromato-
`
`graphic and spectroscopic methods: free tyrosine or sulfonated
`
`derivatives show red—shifted uv-maxima of strong intensities
`
`in basic solution. Equally sensitive is the detection of such
`contaminants by 1H-nmr
`(13). The usefulness of Na—acyl—
`
`tyrosine—O—sulfate as starting material in the synthesis of
`
`peptides was then investigated on the C-terminal sequence
`
`24-33 of CCK (Fig. 5). For this purpose Fmoc-Tyr(SO3Ba1/2)-OH
`was prepared and coupled to the C-terminal hexapeptide
`
`derivative as outlined in the synthetic scheme; subsequent
`
`removal of the Na—protecting group with piperidine proceeded
`
`smoothly as well as the N-terminal elongation to the deca-
`peptide derivative 24-33, which upon Na-deprotection by
`treatment with piperidine represents a suitable key-
`
`fragment for the synthesis of higher molecular weight
`
`CCK-peptides. Removal of the residual acid-labile protecting
`
`groups by exposure to 90 % trifluoroacetic acid followed
`
`by chromatographic purification of the crude product led
`
`to the CCK-decapeptide in over 60 % yield as homogeneous
`
`material as judged by all the analytical assays performed
`
`(14). The sulfate-ester moiety was found to be surprisingly
`
`stable towards fikzacidolytic deprotection step, most
`
`probably because of the sequential proximity of the strong
`basic function of the arginine side-chain.
`In fact the sulfate
`
`ester function in tyrosine-O—sulfate and related peptides
`is hydrolysed under identical conditions usually to about
`20 %. As expected the alkylation of the tryptophan
`
`residue and the high tendency of the methionine residues
`
`to oxidation were again observed. Unfortunately reduction
`of
`the S—oxides with thiols as well as partial suppression
`of indole-alkylation by thiols as scavangers is precluded
`by the facile hydrolysis of the sulfate ester under acidic
`
`conditions in the presence of thiols (15).
`
`-265-
`
`-265-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`.mozfiunfi
`
`
`
`
`
`Emmi”:N:zafibsmovafiszdfiéo-$2-:+EEQ55-3:mmoaifiooam
`
`
`
`
`
`0N:"unusau“owlmq
`
`:ooz\_u:
`
`2::
`
`
`
`73mlm:EO.A.~=mOvnw<A~vaH<-N
`
`fl
`
`:OAQ_ammomtfii+
`
`
`
`6-85mSflzoéamoaéi+Sizmzoiwvmgw
`
`
`
`in2$360gumm:3;N:zémdé;«29950.32?acmrfidéagafim
`
`
`
` >znmum0um50hcummcmnux0|:o«AmE3603co5333330RmfioncdmfiwgfimoouMuugcm2
`
`
`
` mafiuwuwmame:24:$2-25-:=moKm<$zdfiéo$2$«08:96=m0§<§<b£032-85
`
`
`
`3342széabamovafiszhfiéotzémomrfiésmovaéaéésmovmmfi:
`
`HmméflnxuuMO33358
`
`wowEwflom.m.mflm
`
`wcunfluwawm
`
`E£75N:2-“Eb503$;”zafiéoéiQEmMOerSEm
`
`
`Ewmlmamoésmoaééomvméi+
`
`.3.amzobsmovmm<¢05m
`
`266
`
`amzozaon
`
`32:2.Nm2-2::Emovaéézafiég22AQ_£693.:+
`
`
`STE:05smozééumvmiésmovaééoehfi
`
`-266-
`
`-266-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`267
`
`Thus, as for the gastrins the search for stable
`
`analogs
`
`of CCK-peptides became important leading us to the
`
`design of two nonapeptides corresponding to the C—terminal
`
`COR-sequence 25—33 in which methionine-28 was replaced by
`
`threonine — in analogy to caerulein,
`
`the CCK-active peptide
`
`of amphibian skin -
`
`and methionine—31
`
`by leucine and
`
`norleucine, respectively. The syntheses of the two analogs
`were again successfully performed using Na—acyl—tyrosine—O-
`
`sulfate as intermediate and the desired nonapeptides were
`
`obtained according to the scheme outlined in Fig.
`
`6 as
`
`analytically homogeneous products in satisfactory yields (15).
`
`In vivo and in vitro assays revealed the norleucine—analog
`
`as active as CCK—8 and caerulein, whereas replacement of
`
`methionine by leucine was found to lower the hormonal
`
`potency by a factor of 10. These findings surprisingly differ
`
`from those related to the gastrins and may be explained by
`
`the need of a well balanced amphiphilicity which is
`
`better achieved with the combination threonine—norleucine
`
`according to the hydrophobic/hydrophilic increments of the
`
`various residues using the factors of Tanford (37). The observed
`high stability of Thr28, Nle31-CCK-[25-33] both in solution
`
`and on storage as lyophilized powder, resulting from the salt
`
`bridge between the O-sulfate-and guanido—function(15,16), its
`
`fast conversion in vitro to the corresponding CCK-octapeptide form
`
`(38) as well as its equipotency to CCK—8 and caerulein (15),
`
`revealed this analog as perfectly suited for physiological and
`
`clinical research.
`
`The experiences gained in these synthetic studies on CCK-
`
`peptides have opened the way to the preparation of sulfated
`
`gastrin-peptides.
`
`Immunochemical studies
`
`The pronounced tendency of the methionine residue to oxidation
`
`and of tryptophan to oxidative degradation may lead to
`
`deleterious chemical modifications of the gastrin molecule
`
`during its labelling with radioactive iodine unter oxidative
`
`conditions as needed for the preparation of tracers.
`
`These structural modifications
`
`of
`
`the C—terminal
`
`-267-
`
`-267-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
` zmzoEouo_.213széaézmo§<i+:70::okéfiwA_|._[l.l_
`
`
`
`
`
`:2:c-x-:+S:_.mzo-ac..N
`
`
`
`$212;a*_2-2.1~=m0§<kacu~am.:oéoi+£2smzoéamrfi-~
`
`
`
`
`
`2::
`
`
`
`
`
`321%.«22.255smovaminéhi+amlmi:oéoé.£:fi-~
`
`
`
`
`
` hzmmkauflEOMSUmmcmnoxwlcow‘.m3303m:0cowumuufiufimmSmmoucflmxzqu|m\moooanwonf.
`
`MMMImNHIMUUImwmm
`
`
`
`32.NEEm8mammfififimmomamnom.w.mE
`
`
`
`3T3.u:25.:-%<-x-e,__.%#5::mamrfiaééfiz
`
`268
`
`E}:
`
`
`
`32$:«22-23-:smovmékdfiéué5E:*+:2:0-E;mm0mrfi.N
`
`
`
`€815N:zéiésm9m3kéhé0fi:mEEQEmmoaabN
`
`So:3.8:mzomiua
`
`ER:
`
`
`
`.35leN:zaié=m0§<kd§30é=EEHN::22ux520508E:3ux
`
`-268-
`
`
`
`
`
`32:2.N22-2%:3movaékafiéuésmEriflgmmomrfii+Gmlm::o.¢£o§<fi~§<-~
`
`smzomaua
`
`
`
`
`
`3313N:ZéEAEmoV%<-x-&h2u..3mESQEmMOmrfiézmoEmi~53<.~
`
`6:51”:
`
`
`
`3212.N:zéaésmova<-x.a:.écé35.5-5memrfiézmoamfiwéi
`
`
`
`
`
`mmmImNHIMUUIHFmsmqmNHQE9.8
`
`-268-
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`269
`
`sequence of the gastrins undoubtedly arise severe questions
`
`at least in respect to the quantitative interpretation of
`
`data derived from conventional radioimmunoassays. Regarding
`
`the problem methionine a comparative analysis of various
`
`related gastrin analogs revealed the 15-methoxinine-little
`
`gastrin—I — an analog stable to oxidants - as immunoreactive
`
`as the parent methionine peptide towards a series of anti—
`
`gastrin—antisera (20) and thus, suited for the preparation of
`
`tracers. The main difficulty, however, derives from the
`
`tryptophan residue. A systematic investigation of the
`
`oxidative destruction of tryptophan during radioiodination
`
`of tyrosine via the various proposed procedures revealed
`
`that under all conditions employed tryptophan is degraded
`
`to large extents (39 — 40). Formylation of the indole function
`
`was found to prevent the side reaction (40); but even if
`promising in this respect,
`the Nin-formyl group is certainly
`
`not in all cases the most adequate bypass, since its removal
`
`occurs under alcaline conditions where not all peptide
`
`sequences are sufficiently stable.
`
`These shortcomings of the preparation of radioiodinated
`
`tracers,
`
`the molecular heterogeneity of the gastrin—CCK family
`
`and the relatively high immunogenicity of the common C—terminal
`
`sequence as resulting from immunization with conventionally
`
`produced antigens, make the characterization of gastrin-and
`
`CCK—immunoreactivity by the usual
`insufficient.
`
`immunological methods
`
`Our approach to improve selectivity and specificity of these
`
`methods is outlined in Fig. 7. It is based on the incorporation
`
`of a reactive anchor-group via a spacer, at a definite position
`
`of the peptide-chain,
`
`to be used for the specific conjugation
`
`of the peptide factor to high molecular weight carriers as
`
`needed for immunization experiments, as well as for the
`
`incorporation of the tracer group. For this purpose the
`
`maleimido group was selected since it is known to react
`
`rapidly and rather specifically with thiols.
`
`In a first set of experiments maleimido-B-alanine—N—hydroxy-
`
`succinimido ester (41) was used to acylate human little
`
`gastrin—I—[2—17]
`
`(Fig. 8). The resulting gastrin derivative
`
`-269-
`
`-269-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`[Illa/D
`
`
`
`wUBQwQLOLUCm
`
`[é
`
`270
`
`w>fipomammmHowmamsow.n.wflmé[I'm/$99IDémUEQwQ
`6cmmumomupmomammnHGMm
`
`Um~m>20m
`
`
`
`mHOuommmvflpmmmmomcmvfl#cm
`
`-270-
`
`-270-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`2H
`
`Mal—B—Ala—ONSu
`
`+ H—Gly—Pro—Trp—Leu-(Glu) S—Ala—Tyr—GIy—Trp—Met—Asp—Phe—N H 2
`
`DMF / ACN
`
`Mal—B—Ala—GIy—Pro-Trp—Leu— ( Glu) 5—AIa—Tyr—Gly—Trp—Met—Asp—Phe-NH 2
`
`peptide content (Mr = 2138.4)
`
`: 90 %
`
`hplc (u—Bondapak C18):
`
`isocratic elution with acetonitrile/0.1 M sodium phosphate
`
`(pH 5.0), 28:72, flow rate 1.4 ml/min, 280 nm;
`
`tlc: n-BuOH/ACOH/Pyridine/H20; 60:6:20:2H
`
`n—BuOH/AcOH/H20;60:flh20
`
`Fig. 8. Synthesis of maleoyl-B-alanyl—human little
`
`gastrin-I-[2-17]
`
`was found to be well suited for a smooth and clean preparation
`
`of radiolabelled tracers via its reaction with {125 II-desamino-
`tyrosyl-cysteine,
`[3H]-acetylcysteine or [3SS]-cysteine;
`the
`
`related derivatives were found to retain full immunoreactivity,
`
`e.g. Fig. 9. With this approach the problem related to the
`
`methionine and tryptophan residue would be resolved.
`
`However,
`
`to bypass also
`
`radiolysis of the gastrin molecule
`
`and thuslthe storage problem as well as waste-problems,an
`
`alternative fluorescence—immunoassay based on a fluorogenic
`
`enzyme substrate linked to the hormone molecule (Fig. 10) was
`
`elaborated. The fluorogenic tracer was used to develop a double-
`
`antibody enzyme-immunoassay for gastrin which showed to be
`
`sufficiently sensitive to determine normal gastrin levels in
`
`healthy humans
`
`(41).
`
`The conventional conjugation procedures used in the preparation
`
`of antigens employ reagents, e.g. carbodiimides, which undoubtedly
`
`involve the most reactive functions along the hapten molecule,
`
`e.g.
`
`in the case of gastrins the various carboxyl functions in
`
`the central region of the molecule. This fact may be responsible
`
`for the observed high immunogenicity of the C-terminal
`
`-271-
`
`-271-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`272
`
`O.
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`110
`
`[3/80x100
`
`0
`
`10
`
`pmol/l
`
`10
`
`Fig. 9. Comparative immunoreactivities of HG-17 (o——o——o)
`
`and of the conjugate cysteine/Mal—B-Ala-HG—[2—17]
`1251-HG—[1-17]
`
`in cross reactions versus
`
`(o—~o——o)
`
`using antigastrin-antiserum No. 2127 of Rehfeld
`
`tetrapeptide and thus, for the difficult production of
`
`gastrin— or CCK—specific antisera (42). On the assumption that
`
`selectivelinkage of the gastrin at its N-terminus to carriers
`
`with concomitant full exposure of the unmodified hapten
`
`molecule to the antigen recognition may lead to more selective
`
`and specific antisera, maleimido—B-alanyl—human little gastrin—
`
`[2—17] was conjugated to reduced RNase A. The antisera raised
`
`in rabbits with this antigen were used to titrate the immuno—
`
`reactivity of the gastrin sequence. As shown in Fig. 11, a
`
`sharp cooperative transition was observed upon incorporation
`
`of the third glutamic acid residue, while the C-terminal
`
`tetrapeptide is recognized to very low extents. A similar
`
`sigmoidal curve in function of chain—length of the gastrin
`
`was determined for the acid secretion potency (12) as
`
`shown in Fig. 12 and for the onset of the proposed "active"
`
`B-structure as determined by circular dichroism measurements
`
`-272-
`
`-272-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`0\O
`
`\moN[1200;I0.28542.00
`
`o\o
`
`\_mmN-:28;z0]285-228
`
`_:mzo:\uuo
`
`mzu
`
`0MANIUVAll
`mzumN_
`
`AIn:
`
`
`
`
`
`<02-o;n_-ou-mRNonouiziNAN:8%
`
`273
`
`\wcfamocgbsntu
`
`_ocm;«moL03_t:
`
`<02-o:n_loulm”N18-ou-:z-NANIUTmI+
`
`
`:FeNHIOI|m_<lc|_mS_
`
`Nm_omo_m
`
`<u2-m;n_-ou-mAN:8
`_'ouiszIS
`
`E-NH-o:-ou-N
`ANISé_m
`
`:mzooo
`
`-273-
`
`
`
`<usTm§éulmANIBéulzz.NAN18$
`
`Axillll.N
`
`
`
`:ziNANIB-m-m-NAN:uTN:z+m.N:N_:
`
`<§rm§éu
`
`:oou
`
`
`
`mmHmomugqfiupmmmOHQQmOHODHm6Mowfimmflucwm.oe.mflm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mumfiumndmnflmmmuuofimco
`
`-273-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`100
`
`75
`
`
`
`1C50(HGl-17)/IC50x100
`
`1
`
`3
`
`5
`
`7
`
`9
`
`11
`
`13
`
`15
`
`T7
`
`Pyr-Gly—Pm-Trp—Leu-Glu—Glu—Glu-GIu-Glu-Ala—Tyr—Gly-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH2
`pyr____.—___‘3‘:— MHz
`H-Gl y—————————~—————Me1 —Phe-NH2
`
`Pyr-——————- Nle —— Phe-NH2
`
`Pyr
`Nle -— Phe-N H2
`Pyr—————— Nle —Phe-NH2
`
`Pyr——-——— Nle
`Phe-NHZ
`Pyr,———- Nle———— Phe-NH2
`
`Fig. 11. Titration of the immunoreactivity of the human
`
`little-gastrin-I sequence
`
`100
`
`onO
`
`“/aAktivitdt mC
`
`1.0
`
`20
`
`123 I. 567891011121314151617
`
`{élu—Gly —Pro -Trp - Leu-Glu -Glu—Glu- Glu-Glu—Alu -Tyr-Gly - Trp-Nle-Asp- Phe-NH2
`
`H-Leu ————————————————————Phe-NH2
`
`félu ———————————————Phe~NH2
`
`fism——————————_Phe-NH2
`
`12am ———————————Phe—NH2
`
`is
`
`I
`
`v
`
`A
`
`o
`
`FGIu——._—Phe—NH2 a
`
`félu—————_Phe— NH2
`
`H-Trp—-—Phe- NH2
`
`A
`
`0
`
`Fig. 12. Stimulation of gastric acid secretion in rats by
`
`gastrin-I-peptides expressed as percentage of the
`response to Nle15—HG—17
`
`-274-
`
`-274-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`275
`
`of the gastrin peptides in trifluoroethanol
`
`(43 — 44).
`
`This parallel development of the conformational, biological
`
`and immunological properties in function of chain—length
`
`strongly suggests that the immunodeterminant expressed by
`
`this new approach may possibly be conformation-dependent.
`
`This should be equivalent to an enhancement of selectivity
`
`and specificity of the antisera. Further experiments related
`
`to both the gastrins and cholecystokinins are in progress
`
`to confirm these promising findings.
`
`References
`
`1.
`
`Tracy, H.J. and Gregory, R.A.
`
`(1964) Physiological
`
`properties of a series of synthetic peptides
`
`structurally related to gastrin I. Nature, 204, 935—938.
`
`Gregory, H., Hardy, P.M., Jones, P.S., Kenner, G.W.
`
`and Sheppard, R.C.
`
`(1964) The antral hormon gastrin;
`
`structure of gastrin. Nature, 204, 931-933.
`
`Gregory, R.A. and Tracy, H.J.
`
`(1966) Isolation of two
`
`gastrins from human antral mucosa. Nature, 209, 583.
`
`For review see Mutt, V.
`
`(1983) Chemistry of the
`
`Gastrointestflwl Hormones and Hormone-like Peptides and
`
`a Sketch of Their Physiology and Pharmacology. Vitamins
`
`and Hormones. Vol. 39, 231-427.
`
`Wfinsch, E. and Deimer, K.H.
`
`(1972) Zur Synthese des
`
`[15-Leucin]Human-Gastrin I. II. Mitteilung: Herstellung
`
`der Gesamtsequenz. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol.Chem. 3E3,
`1255—1258.
`
`Wfinsch, E., Jaeger, E., Deffner, M. and Scharf, R.
`
`(1972)
`
`Zur Synthese des [15-Leucin]Human-Gastrins I. III. Mitteilung:
`
`Zur Reindarstellung des synthetischen Heptadecapeptidamids.
`
`Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol.Chem. 3E3, 1716-1720.
`
`Wfinsch, E., Wendlberger, G., Hallet, A., Jaeger, E.,
`
`Knof, S., Moroder, L., Scharf, R., Schmidt, 1.,
`
`Thamm, P. and Wilschowitz, L.
`
`(1977)
`
`Zur Totalsynthese
`
`des Human—Big—gastrins I und seines 32—Leucin—Analogons.
`
`Z. Naturforsch. 32c, 495—506.
`
`-275-
`
`-275-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`276
`
`Wfinsch, E., Wendlberger, G., Mladenova-Orlinova, L.,
`
`Gehring, W., Jaeger, E., Scharf, R., Gregory, R.A.
`
`and Dockray, G.J.
`
`(1981) Totalsynthese des Human-
`
`Big—Gastrins I, Revidierte Primarstruktur. HOppe—Seyler's
`
`Z. Physiol. Chem. 362, 179-185.
`
`Moroder, L., Dress, E., Jaeger, E. and Wfinsch, E-
`
`(1978)
`
`Zur Synthese von [11—Leucin]Human—Minigastrin I. Darstellung
`
`der Gesamtsequenz. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 359,
`
`155—164.
`
`10.
`
`Jaeger, E., Thamm, P., Schmidt, J., Knof, S., Moroder, L.
`
`and Wfinsch, E.
`
`(1978)
`
`Zur Synthese von [11-Leucianuman—
`
`Minigastrin I. II. Mitteilung: Reindarstellung des
`
`synthetischen Tridekapeptidamids sowie Isolierung und
`
`Strukturaufklarung eines Synthese-Nebenprodukts.
`
`Hoppe—Seyler's Z. Physiol.Chem. EEE, 155—164.
`
`11.
`
`Moroder, L., Gehring, W., Nyfeler, R., Scharf, R.,
`
`Thamm, P. and Wendlberger, G.
`
`(1983)
`
`Zur Synthese von
`
`Human—Little—Gastrin I und dessen Leucin-15, Norleucin-15
`
`und Methoxinin—15—Analoga. HOppe—Seyler's Z. Physiol.
`
`Chem. Egg, 157—171.
`
`12.
`
`thring, W., Moroder, L., Borin, G., Lobbia, A., Bali, J.P.
`
`and Wfinsch, E.
`
`(1984)
`
`Synthese von Gastrinaktiven
`
`Peptiden. Untersuchungen zur Struktur—Wirkungsbeziehungen
`
`des natfirlichen Hormons Human-Little—Gastrin I. Hoppe-
`
`Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. EQE, 33*94-
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`Moroder, L., Wilschowitz, L., Jaeger, E., Knof, S.,
`
`Thamm, P. and Wfinsch, E.
`
`(1979)
`
`Synthese von Tyrosin-O-
`
`sulfat—haltigen Peptiden. HOppe—Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem.
`
`ggg, 787-790.
`
`Wfinsch, E., Moroder, L., Wilschowitz, L., Géhring, W.,
`
`Scharf, R. and Gardner, J.D.
`
`(1981)
`
`Zur Totalsynthese
`
`von Cholecystokinin-Pankreozymin. Darstellung des
`
`verknfipfungsféhigen "Schlfisselfragments" der Sequenz
`
`24—33. Hoppe—Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. EQE, 143—152.
`
`-276-
`
`-276-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`277
`
`15. Moroder, L., Wilschowitz, L., Gemeiner, M., Gohring, W.,
`
`Knof, S. Scharf, R., Thamm, P., Gardner, J.D., Solomon, T.E.
`
`and Wfinsch E.
`
`(1981)
`
`Zur Synthese von Cholecystokinin-
`
`Pankreozymin. Darstellung von [28-Threonin, 31-Norleucin]-
`
`und [28-Threonin, 31-Leucin] Ch

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket