throbber
THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF MIGRAINE
`
`StewartJ.Tepper,MD,AlanRapoport,MDandFredSheftell,MD
`
`BACKGROUND– Migraine results from episodic changes in central nervous system physiologic function in hyperexcitable
`brain manifested by abnormal energy metabolism, lowered threshold for phosphene generation, and increased contingent
`negative variation. Human functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencepholography data strongly suggest
`that aura is caused by cortical spreading depression.
`REVIEW SUMMARY– Brain hyperexcitability may be caused by low magnesium levels, mitochondrial abnormalities with
`abnormal phosphorylation of adenosine 59-diphosphate, a dysfunction related to nitric oxide, or calcium channelopathy.
`Low magnesium can result in opening of calcium channels, increased intracellular calcium, glutamate release, and
`increased extracellular potassium, which may in turn trigger cortical spreading depression. Mitochondrial dysfunction has
`been suggested by a low phosphocreatine:Pi ratio and a possible response by migraine patients to riboflavin prophylaxis.
`Nitroglycerine administration results in a delayed migraine-like headache in migraine patients but not in control patients,
`and a nonspecific nitric oxide synthase inhibitor aborted migraine at 2 hours in the majority of tested migraine patients
`compared to controls. Many patients with familial hemiplegic migraine have a missense mutation in the P/Q calcium
`channel, so that this form of migraine, at least, is associated with a demonstrable calcium channelopathy.
`CONCLUSIONS– The generation of migraine occurs centrally in the brain stem, sometimes preceded by cortical spreading
`depression and aura. Activation of the trigeminovascular system stimulates perivascular trigeminal sensory afferent nerves
`with release of vasoactive neuropeptides, resulting in vasodilation and transduction of central nociceptive information.
`There is then a relay of pain impulses to central second- and third-order neurons and activation of brain stem autonomic
`nuclei to induce associated symptoms.
`KEYWORDSmigraine,trigeminovascular,pathophysiology,serotonin
`(THENEUROLOGIST7:279–286,2001)
`
`There are multiple unanswered questions on the patho-
`physiology of migraine. Is there good evidence for the hy-
`perexcitability of brain? What are the causes of the prodrome
`and aura, which may precede migraine pain? Specifically,
`what is the cause of aura and the relationship between aura
`and cortical spreading depression? How do the anticipatory
`events lead to migraine pain, and what generates and main-
`tains migraine pain? What is the genetic susceptibility to
`migraine? What is the anatomy of the migraine system? What
`
`From The New England Center for Headache, Stamford, Connecticut,
`Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New
`Haven, Connecticut, and Department of Psychiatry, New York Medi-
`cal College, New York, New York.
`Send reprint requests to Stewart J. Tepper, MD, Director, the New
`England Center for Headache, 778 Long Ridge Road, Stamford, CT
`06902. E-mail sjtepper@aol.com
`
`is the relationship of serotonin, norepeinephrine, and dopa-
`mine receptor physiology to the migraine system? Finally,
`what areas are likely to result in further understanding of
`migraine and in improved therapeutic options for patients?
`
`HYPEREXCITABILITY AND THE BRAIN
`There are multiple studies supporting interictal and ictal
`hyperexcitability in migraine brain. Thomas et al (1) showed
`exaggerated CO2 reactivity with transcranial Doppler. Sakai
`and Meyer (2,3) described cerebral hyperperfusion and ab-
`normal cerebrovascular reactivity during migraine, which
`suggested elevated neuronal activity. Enhanced photic drive
`responses have been found in electroencephalogram studies
`(4). Schoenen and Timsit-Berthier (5) demonstrated in-
`creased contingent negative variation in migraine, an event-
`related slow cerebral potential. Aurora et al (6) and Aurora
`
`279
`
`1
`
`EX2295
`Eli Lilly & Co. v. Teva Pharms. Int'l GMBH
`IPR2018-01711
`
`

`

`280
`
`T H E N E U R O L O G I S T
`
`P A T H O P H Y S I O L O G Y O F M I G R A I N E
`
`and Welch (7) found a lower threshold for, and higher
`incidence of, phosphene generation in migraine patients,
`especially in cases of migraine with aura.
`Two groups have shown abnormal energy metabolism in
`migraine brain, Welch’s group (8) and Barbirolli’s group (9).
`Finally, Welch and Ramadan (10) demonstrated low phos-
`phocreatine, high adenosine 59-diphosphate, and a low phos-
`phorylation PCr:Pi ratio, which can lead to membrane in-
`stability. Thus,
`there is much data that point
`to this
`hyperexcitability.
`It is possible that migraine can occur in anyone. Raskin
`(11) described the precipitation of migraine-like headaches
`when neurosurgeons implanted electrodes in the periaque-
`ductal gray and raphe nuclei of the brain stem. Instead of
`resulting in analgesia,
`the implants produced migrainous
`headaches in the patients.
`Genetic susceptibility may result in a lowered threshold
`to activation of neurons in migraine patients. Presumably, a
`complex multifactorial polygenic inheritance with variable
`penetration results in the protean clinical picture of migraine,
`perhaps even including the presence or absence of aura and
`the differing triggers to migraine activation. The reasons for
`the episodic activation remain obscure.
`
`ANTICIPATORY SYMPTOMS
`Prodrome
`Prodromes consist of a variety of autonomic, neurologic,
`and systemic symptoms. Autonomic symptoms include fluid
`retention, yawning, diaphoresis, diarrhea, constipation, thirst,
`cold feelings, and polyuria. Neurologic symptoms may be
`euphoria,
`irritability, depression, photophonophobia,
`stiff
`neck, disinhibition and hyperactivity, and cognitive dysfunc-
`tion. Systemic symptoms include anorexia, fatigue, and food
`cravings. The nature of prodrome symptomotology suggests
`cortical, limbic, and hypothalamic activation (12).
`Prodrome is not aura, and how often it precedes migraine
`pain is unknown. There are no validated criteria for its
`diagnosis. Nonevolutive prodrome is described as occurring
`more than 6 hours and up to 48 hours before migraine pain,
`whereas evolutive prodrome leads directly into migraine
`pain, with or without aura, within 6 hours.
`
`Aura and Cortical Spreading Depression
`Because aura is most frequently a visual phenomenon,
`Welch et al (13) stated, “The occipital cortex is to migraine
`as the temporal
`lobe is to epilepsy.” Visual aura is most
`frequently a paracentral homonomous scotoma of crenellated
`crescentic shape or arc, with a bright, jagged border, which
`often enlarges, moves across the visual field, and scintillates.
`Lashley (14), in 1941, described his own aura as fortification
`spectra moving at a rate of 2 to 3 mm/min across the cortex.
`The International Headache Society criteria for migraine
`with aura are:
`
`1. Aura consisting of one or more reversible brain
`symptoms (cortical or brain stem)
`2. Gradual development of one aura symptom over 4
`minutes or more
`3. Aura duration less than 60 minutes
`4. Headache follows aura in less than 60 minutes (15).
`
`In 1944, Leao (16), at Harvard, reported that after a
`needle stab to rabbit cortex, there was a neural and glial
`gradual depolarization at a rate of 2 to 5 mm/min. Applying
`potassium or glucose or other trauma to mammalian cortex
`can also induce this cortical spreading depression (CSD).
`Milner (17) suggested the link between aura and CSD in
`1958, but he did not prove causality or equivalence.
`Is there human CSD? It can be induced in human
`hippocampus cells in tissue culture but has never been de-
`scribed in situ. In laboratory animals, CSD is a primary
`neuronal event, with secondary vascular components. The
`initial event of CSD is neuronal activation with hyperoxia,
`and Lauritzen et al (18 –20) found up to a 300% increase in
`blood flow.
`The hyperemia is followed by a wave of neuronal de-
`pressed activity, accompanied by spreading oligemia, at a
`level that does not reach ischemia. The events occur in gray
`matter, are not localized to one vascular distribution, and stop
`at major sulci,
`for example, the parieto-occipital sulcus.
`These features further underline the primarily neuronal,
`rather than the primarily vascular, basis of CSD.
`Direct observations of human aura by a variety of tech-
`niques are closing the circle of CSD and aura. Barkely et al
`(21), working in Welch’s laboratory, described magnetoen-
`cephalographic changes that included spontaneous depolar-
`ization, transient neuronal suppression, and large-amplitude
`waves in humans that parallel animal CSD.
`Moskowitz and colleagues in his laboratory have used
`BOLD, perfusion-weighted imaging, time of flight in func-
`tional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and retinotopy
`with visual stimulation as they attempted to characterize the
`onset, speed of progression, pattern, duration, and recovery
`from human aura. They assumed that blood flow would be a
`useful surrogate to detect neuronal activation.
`The Moskowitz/Cutrer laboratory examined patients
`(including Dr. Cutrer himself ) in both spontaneous and
`precipitated aura and found initial brief vasodilation and
`hyperemia and then hypoperfusion, decreased mean transit
`time and blood flow, and a foveal representation moving
`anteriorly in the cortex. They demonstrated the onset of the
`aura by changes in the detection of luminance and motion,
`with suppression of visual activation, in V3A in the occipital
`cortex, moving slowly to V2, then to V1 (22).
`Welch’s magnetoencephalographic data revealed direct
`current potential shifts at the beginning of aura, also consis-
`tent with the initial activation (21). His laboratory’s fMRI
`data in precipitated left homonymous quandrantanopic aura
`demonstrated initial bilateral hyperoxia, right greater than
`left, and then spreading depression and oligemia involving
`
`2
`
`

`

`V O L. 7 / N O. 5 / S E P T E M B E R 2001
`
`T H E N E U R O L O G I S T
`
`281
`
`the gray matter during aura. The event began in the posterior
`cerebral artery distribution, spread to the middle cerebral
`artery distribution, and did not respect a single vascular
`distribution (23).
`Cao et al (24), in a follow-up study, studied normal
`patients and those with migraine with and without aura and
`stimulated them to precipitate occipital events. Here, too,
`there was suppression of visual activation.
`Moskowitz (25) presented a summary of his findings at
`the American Neurological Association meeting in October
`1999. He listed the characteristics of CSD and pointed out
`that each of the findings of visual aura in human subjects
`matched animal CSD. His impressive list included: initial
`hyperemia lasting about 3 minutes, subsequent hypoperfu-
`sion lasting about 2 hours, suppression of visual activity, a
`spread of the oligemia at a rate of about 3 mm/min, a
`termination at the parieto-occipital sulcus, and an observa-
`tion that the first areas activated in the aura as well as in CSD
`were the first areas that recovered. The evidence is therefore
`very strong that CSD, a primary neuronal process with
`secondary vascular manifestations, is the cause of visual aura.
`
`Corticalspreadingdepression,a
`primaryneuronalprocesswith
`secondaryvascularmanifestations,is
`thecauseofvisualaura.
`
`Woods et al (26) in 1994 published another important
`report bearing on CSD. In this case, a 45-year-old woman
`was in a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner for
`cognitive testing. She developed an evolutive prodrome that
`consisted of visual blurring and difficulty in fixation but not
`a true aura. PET scans were measured at 15-minute intervals.
`Her brain PET demonstrated profound spreading oligemia,
`beginning in the posterior cerebral artery distribution and
`moving anteriorly into the middle cerebral artery distribu-
`tion, not respecting a single vascular distribution. During this
`oligemia, she had no real neurologic symptoms, no ischemic
`symptoms, and it was 45 minutes from the onset of her mild
`visual blurring to the actual migraine headache.
`The Woods paper raises a number of fundamental ques-
`tions. Is migraine without aura just CSD with oligemia in the
`less eloquent or more silent areas of the brain? Is it that the
`neuronal depression is less severe and not appreciated by the
`patients as an aura? Do patients with recognizable anticipa-
`tory symptoms that are not auras, e.g., recognizable pro-
`dromes, really just have migraine with atypical, subtle aura?
`Or are there patients with prodrome who really have
`migraine with aura, and other patients with true migraine
`without aura or CSD before initiation of migraine pain?
`
`Cutrer’s laboratory has studied patients with migraine with-
`out aura without finding antecedent CSD, suggesting that
`there are patients with true migraine without aura (M. Cu-
`trer, personal communication, January 2000).
`It is worth reviewing the prevalence of aura in migraine.
`About 15% to 20% of people with migraine were found to
`have migraine with aura in the older literature (27). How-
`ever, since the advent of the International Headache Society
`criteria, two studies have found much higher prevalence—
`39% in Rasmussen and Olesen’s study (28) and 38% in
`Dahlof and Riman’s study (29).
`Queiroz et al summarized aura information obtained
`from 100 patients at The New England Center for Headache.
`He gave the questionnaire to 120 consecutive patients with
`visual aura and reported that only 19% had visual auras with
`every attack over a lifetime of migraine with aura. Thirty-
`nine percent had visual aura with their first migraine. In 43%
`aura occurred at least part of the time during the migraine
`pain itself, and in 20% the aura occurred or persisted after the
`migraine pain was over (30).
`
`POTENTIAL CAUSES FOR THE HYPEREXCITABILITY
`OF MIGRAINE BRAIN
`A variety of causes for hyperexcitability of the brain in
`migraine have been suggested. These include low magnesium
`levels, mitochondrial abnormalities, a dysfunction related to
`nitric oxide, or a channelopathy.
`
`Low Magnesium and Brain Hyperexcitability
`Magnesium binds to the glutamate NMDA receptor to
`maintain calcium homeostasis. If there is low magnesium, its
`gating function is not as proficient, and the patient might
`have a tendency to experience aura. Low magnesium can
`result in opening of calcium channels, increased intracellular
`calcium, and aspartate and glutamate release. In addition, the
`level of external potassium rises, and this may trigger CSD.
`Finally,
`low magnesium is also associated with increased
`platelet aggregation, increased serotonin, and, therefore, va-
`soconstriction.
`A number of studies have described low magnesium in
`migraine brain. Jain et al (31) reported low magnesium in
`serum and cerebrospinal fluid, Schoenen et al (32) in serum
`and erythrocytes, and Gallai et al (33,34) and Sarchielli et al
`(35) in mononuclear cells, serum, and saliva in both adult and
`juvenile populations of headache patients. Ramadan et al
`(36,37) have reported low magnesium in a magnetic reso-
`nance spectroscopy study and in patients with familial hemi-
`plegic migraine. In addition, Mauskop et al (38) have re-
`ported low serum ionized magnesium levels, but not total
`magnesium, in patients with migraine.
`Trials with magnesium supplementation for migraine
`prophylaxis,
`including those of Facchinetti et al (39) for
`menstrual migraine, Peikert et al (40), and Pffafenrath et al
`(41), have yielded mixed results. One of the most compelling
`
`3
`
`

`

`282
`
`T H E N E U R O L O G I S T
`
`P A T H O P H Y S I O L O G Y O F M I G R A I N E
`
`of the therapeutic trials was that of Mauskop et al (42) who
`showed in a blinded manner that intravenous magnesium
`aborted severe migraine in those patients with low ionized
`magnesium, but not in those patients with normal ionized
`magnesium.
`
`Mitochondrial Dysfunction
`Magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies have shown
`low phosphocreatine, high adenosine 59-diphosphate, and
`low phosphocreatine:Pi in migraine patients (10). Because
`flavinoids are the cofactor for the Krebs cycle, Schoenen et al
`(43) wondered whether this possible mitochondrial dysfunc-
`tion could be corrected by giving high-dose riboflavin to
`migraine patients. Initially in an open-label, and then in a
`small double-blind, placebo-controlled study, he found that
`after 3 to 4 months of daily use, 400 mg of riboflavin
`decreased migraine frequency, severity, and/or duration in
`about half of the users. If confirmed, this certainly raises the
`question of whether there is a subset of migraine patients
`with a mitochondrial energy metabolic defect that could be
`easily treated.
`
`Nitric Oxide Hypothesis
`Olesen and his collaborators have described that nitro-
`glycerin (NTG) can trigger migraine-like headaches, suggest-
`ing a specific role in primary headache pathogenesis. If non-
`migraine patients are given NTG, they develop immediate
`nonspecific headache. However, when NTG is given to
`migraine patients, they develop the early-onset nonspecific
`headache, and then a headache meeting International Head-
`ache Society criteria for migraine hours later. The nonspe-
`cific headaches may be due to cyclic GMP (cGMP) activa-
`tion, while the delayed migraine may be due to the NTG
`acting as a nitric oxide (NO) donor (44,45).
`There is pharmacologic but indirect clinical evidence for
`the NO hypothesis. Sumatriptan can terminate the NTG-
`induced migraine. Calcium channel blockers may work by
`reducing NO synthase activity and thus levels of NO.
`Serotonin2 (5-HT2) receptor activation stimulates NO
`release; 5-HT2 antagonists are used worldwide as migraine
`prophylactic agents,
`including methysergide, cyprohepta-
`dine, and pizotifen.
`The most interesting evidence is from a small study by
`Lassen et al (45) in Olesen’s clinic. They published a double-
`blind, placebo-controlled study on L-methylarginine HCL
`(546C88), a nonspecific NO synthase inhibitor in the treat-
`ment of acute migraine. They found that 10 of 15 patients
`had headache relief at 2 hours compared to 2 of 14 patients
`who received placebo.
`
`Channelopathy
`Familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) is defined as an
`autosomal dominant disorder with recurrent episodes of mi-
`graine with prolonged aura manifested by severe unilateral
`
`weakness. On chromosomes 19 (46) and 1q (47,48), “mis-
`sense mutations in a neuronal specific P/Q calcium channel
`gene give rise to amino acid substitutions in the pore-forming
`and voltage sensor regions of the alpha 1a subunit of the
`channel. These mutations produce changes in channel ex-
`pression and kinetics that result in a net gain and net loss of
`function” (49,50). Most of these patients respond preven-
`tively to nonspecific calcium channel blockers.
`Upregulation or dysregulation of the calcium channels
`could result in disinhibited NO synthase activity, which in
`turn will liberate NO and induce hyperexcitability or frank
`aura, linking the calcium channelopathy and NO hypotheses.
`Alternatively, the abnormal calcium channel simply destabi-
`lizes the membranes resulting in abnormal ion fluxes, ele-
`vated external potassium concentrations, and initiation of
`CSD.
`As summarized by Hargreaves and Shepheard, “ . . . it is
`possible that the abnormal hyper-responsivity of the brain of
`migraineurs, like FHM, may be a consequence of genetic
`abnormalities in ion channels that regulate neuronal excit-
`ability. This has given rise to the description of migraine as a
`‘channelopathy’” (49,51).
`At the American Headache Society meeting in Montreal
`in June 2000, Professor Jean Schoenen presented evidence
`for more widespread subclinical neurologic dysfunction in
`migraine patients. These abnormalities included asymptom-
`atic cerebellar hypermetria and also increased jitter on single-
`fiber electromyogram. These subtle abnormalities, found by
`physiologic testing, which Professor Schoenen showed in
`patients with migraine without aura, with aura, and with
`prolonged aura, could be accounted for by calcium chan-
`nelopathy (52). The findings represented the first evidence
`for widespread calcium channelopathy in patients without
`FHM, but with more garden-variety migraine types. Also
`they might explain the responsiveness of non-FHM migraine
`patients to calcium channel blocker preventive medication.
`
`GENERATION OF THE MIGRAINE PAIN
`In 1995, Diener and colleagues (53) published a seminal
`report on PET scans of nine patients with acute right-sided
`migraine without aura. Nonspecific cortical activation was
`noted, including activation in the cingulate area, auditory
`association, and in the parieto-occipital cortex. These areas of
`activation may be related to the “emotional response” to
`somatic or visceral pain, possibly related to photophono-
`phobia.
`Most importantly, there was activation in the contralat-
`eral brain stem, including the dorsal raphe and locus ceruleus.
`This was the same area that triggered migraine-like headache
`when instrumented by neurosurgeons and reported by
`Raskin et al (11). Because the unilateral dorsal raphe area
`remained activated even after successful treatment of the pain
`with sumatriptan, Professor Diener speculated that this area
`might be the central generator for the migraine process, but
`not the cause of the pain.
`
`4
`
`

`

`V O L. 7 / N O. 5 / S E P T E M B E R 2001
`
`T H E N E U R O L O G I S T
`
`283
`
`There is not much sensory innervation for the brain itself,
`so explaining how head pain is generated requires some
`reach. Moskowitz has made the analogy to visceral pain,
`because migraine pain is poorly localized, often diffuse, and
`difficult to characterize in quality. He describes the meninges
`as the pain-sensitive capsule, with the brain as the visceral
`organ. Pain can be generated both intracranially from vessels
`and dura and extracranially from the skull and its coverings
`and investments, such as muscle, fascia, and skin.
`For 20 years, Moskowitz has explored the anatomy and
`pathophysiology of head pain and has been joined by labo-
`ratories worldwide. He began by restating the obvious: the
`key to the head pain is V1, the first (ophthalmic) division of
`the trigeminal nerve.
`The trigeminal nerve in this distribution arises from
`pseudounipolar neurons in the trigeminal ganglion, and it
`innervates ipsilateral meninges. It projects peripherally to
`intracranial extracerebral vessels in the meninges and centrally
`through the pons to the trigeminal nuclei in the brain stem
`(trigeminal nucleus caudalis) and upper cervical cord, the
`trigeminocervical complex.
`The trigeminal nerve fires upon repetitive cortical dis-
`charge, and this may offer a clue to the difficult question of
`how aura or prodrome links to migraine pain. Further, the
`trigeminal nerve can be sensitized, offering a possible expla-
`nation for the intensification of migraine pain during an
`attack, and for chronic pain, central sensitization, and allo-
`dynia in chronic headache.
`Tassorelli et al (54) noted that fos expression is seen, in a
`delayed fashion, after nitroglycerin administration in trigem-
`inal nucleus caudalis, locus ceruleus, and periaqueductal gray.
`Thus, the nitroglycerin would be the donor for NO, and the
`NO could cause central trigeminal activation.
`Trigeminal sensory C fibers contain substance P, calci-
`tonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and vasoactive intestinal
`peptide. Antidromic stimulation of the trigeminal nerve re-
`sults in release of CGRP, substance P, and vasoactive intes-
`tinal peptide from sensory C fibers. This release causes dila-
`tion of meningeal vessels, fenestration of the vessels, and
`plasma extravasation, resulting in sterile, neurogenic inflam-
`mation (55). Goadsby and Edvinsson found an increase in
`CGRP in human jugular during migraine (but not of sub-
`stance P or vasoactive intestinal peptide), and a decrease of
`CGRP after treatment with sumatriptan (56). The work is
`important both because it suggests that CGRP may be the
`most important neuroinflammatory peptide in the migraine
`process and that CGRP does increase in humans, not just in
`experimental animals.
`All or some of this peripheral pathology (vasodilation and
`inflammation of the meninges) stimulates trigeminal sensory
`afferents, which, in turn, transduce this nociceptive informa-
`tion centrally. This arc is referred to as the trigeminovascular
`system.
`Serotonergic, noradrenergic, and dopaminergic pathways
`are involved in the processing of pain centrally. Ascending
`serotonergic pathways are associated with enkephalin in the
`
`second-order neurons, and project to midbrain raphe, thal-
`amus, hypothalamus, and cortex. These pathways are thus
`also intimately associated with pain control, autonomic and
`neuroendocrine function, and sleep.
`
`Calcitoningene-relatedpeptide
`(CGRP)maybethemostimportant
`neuroinflammatorypeptideinthe
`migraineprocess....
`
`Descending serotonergic pathways project to the periaq-
`ueductal gray, from there to the medullary raphe and the
`spinal cord dorsal horn (57,58). Noradrenergic pathways
`connect locus ceruleus to cortex and utilize gamma ami-
`nobutyric acid in the interneurons (59).
`In addition to the attention to serotonergic pathways,
`there has been renewed interest recently in dopaminergic
`pathways, which connect the substantia nigra and red nucleus
`(60). The red nucleus is activated in CSD and aura (23).
`It may be possible to put together the following steps in
`the generation of migraine pain.
`
`1. Activation of a central brain stem generator after
`CSD or without CSD. The generator may be the
`dorsal raphe contralateral to the pain, if the findings
`of Professors Diener and Raskin are accepted, or may
`be the trigeminal nucleus caudalis, activated by NO.
`2. Antidromic stimulation of the trigeminovascular sys-
`tem with resultant meningeal vasodilation, resulting
`in:
`a. Activation of perivascular trigeminal sensory affer-
`ent nerves and transmission of pain impulses cen-
`trally to caudal brain stem nuclei
`b. Release of vasoactive neuropeptides resulting in
`further vasodilation and neurogenic inflammation.
`3. There is then a relay of pain impulses from the
`activated peripheral sensory nerves to central second-
`order sensory neurons in the trigeminocervical com-
`plex. There is sensitization and intensification of
`headache pain as the attack progresses and increased
`sensitivity to convergent sensory stimuli from ex-
`tracranial tissues. This is a “windup phenomenon”
`(49).
`4. Trigeminal nuclei then relay incoming pain signals to
`higher cortical centers to register pain, photophobia,
`and phonophobia. There is activation of adjacent
`brain stem nuclei such as nucleus tractus solitariuus to
`initiating nausea, vomiting, and dysautonomia (61).
`
`5
`
`

`

`284
`
`T H E N E U R O L O G I S T
`
`P A T H O P H Y S I O L O G Y O F M I G R A I N E
`
`5-HT RECEPTORS
`Triptans and ergots are serotonin receptor agonists and
`activate, in particular, 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors. The
`profile of receptor stimulation differs somewhat between
`triptans, which are more specific, and ergots, which activate
`a broad range of serotonin and nonserotonin receptors.
`
`Triptansandergotsareserotonin
`receptoragonistsandactivate,in
`particular,5-HT1B and5-HT1D
`receptors.
`
`Recent information has changed yet again and expanded
`our view of the key 5-HT1 receptors. Hargreaves and Shep-
`heard (49) have summarized these findings recently, added
`some provocative comments, and divided them up as follows:
`1. Vasoconstrictor 5-HT1B receptors occur on human
`meningeal blood vessel smooth muscle, and, in far
`fewer numbers, on human coronary arteries. Activa-
`tion produces vasoconstriction.
`2. Vasodilatory 5-HT1B and 5-HT7 receptors occur on
`human vascular endothelium also in meningeal and
`coronary arteries. Activation produces vasodilation.
`a. The presence of 5-HT1B vasodilating receptors
`raises the question of whether the initiation of
`migraine pain could come from activation of these
`receptors. Further, they could explain the para-
`doxical responses some patients complain of when
`they state that a triptan or ergot caused worsening
`of their headache.
`b. If stimulation of 5-HT7 receptors causes chronic
`vasodilation, could a 5-HT7 antagonist be devel-
`oped as a migraine preventive medication?
`c. Could preferential activation of the endothelial
`5-HT1B and 5-HT7 receptors be involved in mi-
`graine recurrence? That is, as the 5-HT1B/1D ag-
`onist plasma concentrations fall, the smooth mus-
`cle vasoconstriction is reduced, but the endothelial
`vasodilation is maintained, resulting in return of
`migraine pain and associated symptoms.
`d. There appear to be 5-HT1B receptors located
`centrally in human trigeminal ganglia, but the
`associated trigeminal nerves do not project to the
`periphery as do the trigeminal nerves served by
`the central 5-HT1D receptors. Thus, the central
`5-HT1B receptors are of unknown clinical signif-
`icance.
`3. Trigeminal inhibitory 5-HT1D receptors are located
`prejunctionally on trigeminal nerves projecting pe-
`
`ripherally to dural vasculature and modulating neu-
`rotransmitter release, inhibiting activated trigeminal
`nerves, and normalizing blood vessel caliber. They
`are also located centrally on trigeminal ganglia and
`interrupt nociceptive signals to brain stem second-
`order neurons initiated by peripheral blood vessel
`dilation, possibly neurogenic inflammation, and sen-
`sitized sensory nerve endings. The 5-HT1D receptors
`are also located on nucleus tractus solitariuus and may
`inhibit nausea, vomiting centrally (61).
`4. Trigeminal inhibitory 5-HT1F receptors are in loca-
`tions similar to the 5-HT1D receptors and may have
`similar peripheral action. However, the 5-HT1F re-
`ceptors have a wider distribution in brain, and their
`activity is not fully elucidated. Activation of these
`receptors, like the 5-HT1D receptors, is without vas-
`cular effect. Lilly developed and tested a 5-HT1F
`receptor agonist (LY334370), and it worked in abort-
`ing migraine, but the program was discontinued after
`toxicity in laboratory animals (49,62).
`
`AREAS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH
`The fundamental question is whether the hyperexcitabil-
`ity of the migraine brain, which must be regarded as the
`cardinal problem, can be corrected. Now that CSD appears
`the likely cause of migrainous aura, a variety of approaches
`can be taken, given the level of understanding of the process,
`to abort or prevent CSD genesis.
`
`Thefundamentalquestioniswhether
`thehyperexcitabilityofthemigraine
`brain,whichmustberegardedas
`thecardinalproblem,canbe
`corrected.
`
`The CSD may be initiated by NO, which may also
`activate the brain stem directly to generate the migraine pain.
`So one unifying therapeutic approach may be to inhibit
`synthesis of NO or block its effects.
`NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors and the NO pathways
`may be a key in both aborting and preventing migraine, the
`latter as a means to reducing the hyperexcitability. There
`remains debate as to which isoform of NOS is most impor-
`tant, probably inducible NOS (iNOS) or neuronal NOS
`(nNOS) but not endothelial NOS (eNOS).
`At a mitochondrial
`level, a study should be possible
`matching mitochondrial dysfunction by clinical
`laboratory
`
`6
`
`

`

`V O L. 7 / N O. 5 / S E P T E M B E R 2001
`
`T H E N E U R O L O G I S T
`
`285
`
`testing (e.g., phophorylation index) to flavinoid responsive-
`ness.
`Many pharmaceutical companies and clinics are collect-
`ing genetic material during clinical research. Further eluci-
`dation of channelopathies and their clinical treatment and
`correction may be helpful, and positional cloning with link-
`age and association has already linked FHM, CADASIL
`(cerebral autosomal dominant arteropathy with subcortical
`infarcts and leukoercephalopathy), and some of the episodic
`cerebellar ataxias.
`With respect to calcium channel blockers, the most ef-
`fective nonspecific calcium channel blocker for migraine
`prophylaxis is flunarazine, and usage is limited by depression
`and weight gain. Flunarazine is not available in the United
`States, but dotarazine is under study. More specific calcium
`channel blockers, especially P/Q blockers, may be even more
`effective and await development.
`A question remains as to whether vasoconstriction is
`necessary to abort acute migraine. A pure vasoconstrictor
`agonist, working on meningeal vessels, has not yet been
`tested. CGRP antagonists may prevent or reverse meningeal
`artery vasodilation. On the other hand, a number of seroto-
`nin-active medications that are not vasoactive have been
`studied, and, at the least, one 5-HT1F agonist was clinically
`useful in aborting migraines. Clearly, the study of medica-
`tions that are inactive on vessels will help further elucidate the
`mechanism of the generation of migraine pain and symptoms
`and may yield great clinical benefit.
`Pure inhibition of peripheral neurogenic inflammation
`has so far been relatively unsuccessful clinically, by way of
`5-HT1D agonists and SP/NK1 receptor antagonists, al-
`though the 1D agonist tried may have lacked sufficient
`efficacy at the human 1D receptor or may not have been
`given in the correct doses.
`Leukotrienes are released in neuro

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket