throbber
J Inherit Metab Dis (2010) 33 (Suppl 3):S321-S328
`DOl 10.1007/s10545-010-9172-9
`
`RESEARCH REPORT
`
`Simultaneous LC-MS/MS determination of phenylbutyrate,
`phenylacetate benzoate and their corresponding metabolites
`phenylacetylglutamine and hippurate in blood
`and urine
`
`Maurice D. Laryea • Diran Herebian •
`Thomas Meissner • Ertan Mayatepek
`
`Received: 13 January 2010 /Revised: 15 June 2010 I Accepted: 7 July 2010 /Published online: 7 August 2010
`© SSIEM and Springer 2010
`
`Abstract Inborn errors of urea metabolism result in hyper(cid:173)
`ammonemia. Treatment of urea cycle disorders can effectively
`lower plasma ammonium levels and results in survival in the
`majority of patients. Available medications for treating urea
`cycle disorders include sodium benzoate (BA), sodium
`phenylacetate (PAA), and sodium phenylbutyrate (PBA) and
`are given to provide alternate routes for disposition of waste
`nitrogen excretion. In this study, we develop and validate a
`liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/
`MS) method for simultaneous determination ofbenzoic acid,
`phenylacetic acid, phenylbutyric acid, phenylacetylglutamine,
`and hippuric acid in plasma and urine from children with
`inborn errors of urea synthesis. Plasma extracts and diluted
`mine samples were injected on a reverse-phase column and
`identified and quantified by selected reaction monitoring
`(SRM) in negative ion mode. Deuterated analogues served as
`internal standards. Analysis time was 7 min. Assay precision,
`accuracy, and linearity and sample stability were determined
`using enriched samples. Quantification limits of the method
`were 100 ng/ml (0.3-0.8 11-mol/L) for all analytes, and
`recoveries were >90%. Inter- and intraday relative standard
`deviations were <10%. Our newly developed LC-MS/MS
`represents a robust, sensitive, and rapid method that allows
`simultaneous determination of the five compounds in plasma
`and urine.
`
`Communicated by: Marinus Duran
`
`Competing interest: None declared.
`
`M. D. Laryea (~) · D. Herebian · T. Meissner· E. Mayatepek
`Department of General Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital,
`Heinrich-Heine-University,
`MoorenstraJ3e 5,
`40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
`e-mail: Laryea@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
`
`Abbreviations
`LC-MS/MS Liquid chromatography tandem mass
`spectrometry
`Benzoate
`Phenylacetate
`Phenylbutyrate
`Hippurate
`Phenylacetylglutamine
`Internal standard
`
`BA
`PAA
`PBA
`HA
`PAG
`IS
`
`Introduction
`
`Ammonia is a toxic compound produced in the body from
`catabolism of amino acids and protein. Ammonia is
`converted to urea in the liver cells by urea-cycle enzymes
`and eliminated in the urine as nitrogenous waste (Shih
`2007). Inborn errors of urea metabolism result in hyper(cid:173)
`ammonemia, and prompt recognition and treatment of urea
`cycle disorders can effectively lower plasma ammonium
`levels and results in survival in the majority of patients
`(Enns et al. 2007). Treatment of urea cycle disorders
`consists of a protein-restricted diet and, in some cases,
`essential amino acid supplementation (Wilcken 2004).
`Nowadays, urea cycle defects are part of extended tandem
`mass spectrometry (MS/MS)-based newborn screening
`programs, as reviewed extensively by Garg and Dasouki
`(2006).
`Available medications for treating urea cycle disorders
`include sodium benzoate (BA), sodium phenylacetate
`(PAA), and sodium phenylbutyrate (PBA) and are given
`to provide alternate routes for disposition of waste nitrogen
`
`~Springer
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1026
`Par v. Horizon, IPR of Patent No. 9,561,197
`Page 1 of 8
`
`

`

`S322
`
`J Inherit Metab Dis (2010) 33 (Suppl3):S321-S328
`
`excretion. The administration of BA results in conjugation
`of BA with glycine to form benzoyl glycine, also known as
`hippuric acid (HA), which is rapidly cleared by the kidney.
`Similarly, the administration of PAA results in conjugation
`with glutamine and excretion of phenylacetylglutamine
`(PAG) (Webster et al. 1976), a normal constituent of human
`urine (Stein et al. 1954). The molecular structures of the
`target analytes are depicted in Fig. 1. The phenylacetyl
`moiety of PAG probably is a product of phenylalanine
`metabolism and occurs in the human circulation in low
`concentrations. Both PAA and BA have been administered
`to children with hyperammonemia due to inborn errors of
`urea synthesis (Batshaw 1983 ; Brusilow et al. 1984;
`Brusilow 1991). BA was recently shown to be effective
`when infused prenatally (Das et al. 2009). However, PAA
`has an unpleasant odor that limits acceptability by patients;
`recently, PBA, which is rapidly converted to PAA by
`mitochondrial j3-oxidation, has been used as a pro-drug
`(Piscitelli et al. 1995).
`Knowledge regarding concentrations of BA, PAA, and
`PBA and their metabolites HA and PAG in urine and blood
`is a prerequisite for detailed studies on their metabolism
`and for pharmacokinetic and evaluation studies. Further(cid:173)
`more, individual dosage and therapy optimization are
`highly important in children with inborn errors of urea
`synthesis. However, drug monitoring is only of value if the
`results are indeed rapidly available. Procedures described for
`analysis of these compounds are time consuming and require
`large sample volumes because separate chromatographic
`methods are needed to measure all five compounds. To date,
`several studies have addressed the effect and pharmacokinet(cid:173)
`ics of some ofBA, PAA, and PBA in biological systems using
`high-performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatog-
`
`raphy (HPLC-GC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS)
`(Hommes 1999; Kubota et al. 1988; Thibault et al. 1994b;
`Yu et al. 2001 ; Zimmerman et al. 1990). However, none of
`these methods describes the measurement of all the five
`compounds in a single analytical run, which is very
`important when the compounds are coadministered in the
`manner currently used to treat the various hyperammonemias
`(Enns et al. 2007).
`This article describes the development and validation of an
`LC-MS/MS method to simultaneously determine PAA, PBA,
`and BA and their metabolites PAG and HA in body fluids,
`which requires minimal sample volume. The method was
`successfully applied to detect levels ofBA and PBA and their
`metabolites after oral administration to children with hyper(cid:173)
`ammonemia due to inborn errors of urea synthesis.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`Reagents
`
`Benzoylaminoacetic acid (hippuric acid), phenylacetic acid,
`phenylbutyric acid, and benzoic acids were obtained from
`Sigma-Aldrich (Deisenhofen, Germany); PAG was purchased
`from Bachem (Bubendorf, Switzerland); and formic acid was
`from Merck (Darmstadt Germany). Deuterium-labelled inter(cid:173)
`nal standards were purchased from CDN Isotopes (Pointe(cid:173)
`Claire Quebec, Canada). LC-MS-grade methanol and water
`were from Fischer Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA).
`
`Specimen
`
`Pooled blank blood samples used to develop and validate
`the procedure were obtained from the Heinrich-Heine
`University Blood Bank. Blank urine samples were collected
`from healthy laboratory members.
`This study was approved by the ethical committee of the
`~OH
`medical faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University of
`0
`Dusseldorf (Germany), filed under study number 3415.
`
`v
`
`HOOO
`I""'
`0
`
`BA
`
`HA
`
`PAA
`
`Patients
`
`~OH
`6
`
`v
`
`Twelve patients with hyperammonemia due to various
`inborn errors of urea synthesis were studied. Six patients
`had ornithine transcarbamoylase deficiency, three had
`argininosuccinate synthetase deficiency, and three had
`arginase deficiency.
`
`PBA
`
`PAG
`
`Preparation of standards
`
`Fig. 1 Molecular structures of the analytes benzoate (BA), hippurate
`(HA), phenylacetate (PAA), phenylbutyrate (PBA), and phenylacetyl(cid:173)
`glutamine (PAG)
`
`Stock solutions ofPAG, HA, PBA, PAA, and BA (3.7, 5.5,
`6.1, 7.3, and 8.3 mmol/L), respectively, were prepared in
`70% ethanol and stored at -20°C. Combined working
`
`~Springer
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1026
`Par v. Horizon, IPR of Patent No. 9,561,197
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`J Inherit Metab Dis (20 10) 33 (Suppl 3):S32 1-S328
`
`S323
`
`solution was prepared by diluting the stock solution to give
`concentrations of37, 55, 66, 73, and 83 ~-tmol/L PAG, HA,
`PBA, PAA, and BA, respectively. This mixed standard
`solution was further serially diluted with methanol to obtain
`methanol calibration standards in the range ofO.l-37 ~-tmol/L
`for PAG, 0.1-55 ~-tmol/L for HA, 0.1-62 ~-tmol/L for PBA,
`0.2-73 ~-tmol/L for PAA, and 0.2-82 ~-tmol/L for BA. Similar
`calibration standards were also prepared by serially diluting
`the mixed standard solution using plasma and urine.
`Three quality control (QC) samples with low (1.2 ~-tmol/L
`PAG, 1.7 ~-tmol/L HA, 1.9 ~-tmol/L PBA, 2.3 ~-tmol/L PAA,
`and2.6~-tmol/LBA), medium(9.4~-tmol/LPAG, 13.9~-tmol/L
`HA, 15.2 ~-tmol/L PBA, 18.4 ~-tmol/L PAA, and 20.5 ~-tmol/L
`BA), and high (37.7.4 ~-tmol!L PAG, 55.7 ~-tmol!L, HA,
`60.8 ~-tmol/L PBA, 73.6 ~-tmol/L PAA, and 81.9 ~-tmol!L BA)
`were prepared by spiking the mixed standard solution to
`plasma and urine pools. Calibration standards and quality
`control samples were prepared fresh on each day of validation.
`A solution of 10,000 ng/ml each of the deuterated
`labelled analytes in methanol was used as internal standard
`(IS) and consequently for precipitation of protein from
`serum or plasma samples.
`
`Sample preparation
`
`Plasma
`
`One hundred microliters of each sample or standard
`solution containing the analytes of interest were placed
`into a 1.5-ml conical plastic centrifuge tube, and 100 ~-tl of
`IS solution in methanol and a further 100 ~-tl methanol were
`added to the tube to precipitate the proteins in the sample.
`The tubes were capped, vortexed for at least 30 s, and
`centrifuged at 1,000xg for 5 min. Supernatant was
`transferred into autosampler vials.
`
`Urine
`
`As the urine concentrations of HA and PAG were expected
`to be high in urine samples, sample preparation could be
`simplified by a dilution step. Urine of patients was first
`diluted in a ratio of 1:100 with water, and urine of drug-free
`patients was diluted in a ratio of 1:10. Urine was worked up
`using the same procedure as described above.
`
`Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
`
`The LC-MS/MS system used consisted of a Waters
`Alliance 2795 separation module (Waters, Milford, UK)
`coupled to a Quattro Micro mass spectrometry system
`(Micro Mass, Manchester, UK). Guard and analytical
`columns were Phenomenex Gemini NX (4.0x3 mm,
`5 ~-tm) and Gemini NX (2.1 x 15 mm, 3 ~-tm) , respectively.
`
`Sample elution was isocratic over 7 min using a mobile
`phase containing 0.01% formic acid/methanol (35:65, v/v).
`Ten microliters of the supernatant containing the analytes
`were injected into the HPLC.
`Electrospray ionization was performed in the negative
`ionization mode (ESI-). The following conditions were
`found to be optimal for the analysis: capillary voltage 3 kV;
`source block temperature l20°C; desolvation gas (nitrogen)
`heated to 350°C and delivered at a flow rate of 625 L/h.
`The appropriate selected reaction monitoring (SRM) con(cid:173)
`ditions for the individual analytes and their respective
`deuterated analogues were determined by direct infusion
`into the MS/MS. The cone voltage (CV) was adjusted to
`maximize the intensity of the deprotonated molecular
`species [M-HL and collision-induced dissociation of each
`deprotonated molecule was performed. Collision gas
`(argon) pressure was maintained at 2.7 10- 3 mbar and
`the collision energy ( e V) adjusted to optimize the signal
`for the most abundant product ions, which were subse(cid:173)
`quently used for MS. The instrument response for the
`analytes was optimized by infusion experiments of the
`pure compounds dissolved in 70% ethanol at a flow rate of
`10 ~-tllmin.
`All aspects of system operation and data acquisition
`were controlled using Mass Lynx NT 4.0 software with
`automated data processing using the quantify option of
`Mass Lynx software. Statistical analysis was carried out
`using Microsoft Excel.
`
`Method validation
`
`Linearity was assessed by analyzing calibrators ranging in
`concentrations from 0-37.8 ~-tmol/L for PAG, 0-55.8 ~-tmol/
`L for HA, 0-73.4 ~-tmol/L for PAA, 0-61 ~-tmol/L for PBA,
`and 0-82.5 ~-tmol/L for BA using 10-~-tl injection volumes.
`Identities of BA, HA, PAG, PAA, and PBA peaks were
`verified by analyzing the compound-specific mass spectra
`after addition of calibrators. The lower limit of detection
`(LLOD)-as defined by a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 3
`of the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ), as defined by an
`SNR of 10-were determined in both plasma and urine.
`Total and within-run imprecision measured on plasma and
`urine at three concentrations was assessed by analyzing the
`samples six times within 1 day, using >20 different assays
`within a 4-week period. The amounts added to the speci(cid:173)
`mens were chosen to cover the ranges of calibration curves
`and to include all specimens of high value encountered in
`patients being treated with sodium BA, PBA, and PAA.
`Accuracy and recovery of the method was calculated from
`the same samples used for total and within-run imprecision
`measurements. Five assays at each concentration were
`performed. Analyte stability determinations were performed
`as freeze-and-thaw cycle and autosampler stability over
`
`~Springer
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1026
`Par v. Horizon, IPR of Patent No. 9,561,197
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`S324
`
`Table 1 Selected reaction mon(cid:173)
`itoring (SRM) transitions and
`conditions for all compounds
`and their deuterated analogues
`
`Balded transitions used as
`qualifiers.
`
`J Inherit Metab Dis (2010) 33 (Suppl3):S321-S328
`
`Precursor ion (m/z)
`
`Product ion (m/z)
`
`Collision energy (eV)
`
`Benzoic acid
`d5-Benzoic acid
`Phenylacetic acid
`d5-Phenylacetic acid
`Phenylbutyric acid
`dn-Phenylbutyric acid
`Hippuric acid
`d5-Hippuric acid
`Pheny lacety !glutamine
`d5-Phenylyacety !glutamine
`
`121
`126
`135
`140
`163
`174
`178
`183
`263
`268
`
`77
`82
`91
`96
`91
`98
`77/134
`82/139
`127/145
`127/145
`
`10
`10
`15
`15
`15
`10
`10
`15
`25/15
`25/15
`
`3 days at room temperature (RT). For storage stability tests,
`plasma and urine samples were stored up to 7 days at 4 °C
`or RT and at -20°C for 3 months.
`
`Results
`
`Chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry
`
`SRM transitions and fragmentation conditions selected for the
`analytes are shown in Table 1, and corresponding represen(cid:173)
`tative LC-MS/MS chromatograms of the five analytes are
`shown in Fig. 2.
`
`Linearity, LLOD, and LLOQ
`
`Standard calibration curves were generated by plotting the
`response, which is defined as the ratio between the area of
`the target analyte to its IS multiplied by the concentration of
`IS against the concentrations of PAG, HA, PAA, BA, and
`PBA in methanol, plasma, and urine. All calibration curves
`were reproducible, and correlation coefficients (r2
`) of the
`curves were >0.99 for all five analytes. All standard curves
`were linear up to the maximum concentrations measured
`(Fig. 3). The slopes of the calibration curves between pure
`solvent and pooled urine solutions were nearly the same,
`probably due to the high dilution of the urine samples.
`
`Fig. 2 Selected reaction moni(cid:173)
`toring (SRM) chromatograms of
`benzoate (BA), phenylacetate
`(PAA), and phenylbutyrate
`(PBA) and their metabolites
`phenylacetylglutamine (PAG)
`and hippuric acid (HA) in pure
`solvent
`
`~Springer
`
`2.99
`
`2.99
`
`177.9 > 133.9
`
`P G
`
`100
`
`:
`
`''~~]~~~P~A~G~~~~~~~TIITTITI~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~n~~~~~:~6~3.2> 145
`3::1 ::;::::::;:==A;::::::;::::::;:::::;:::::;::::::::;::;:::;::::::;:::=;:::f\~____:;=:::;:::::;:::::::;==:;::::::;:::::;::::;::::::;:==;:::::::;:2=63 _ 2 > 1 2 7
`li
`":~
`W:--f--n-TTTI-;-rr~H~~rrn--rrn-rrr;~TTTTTTT'~'"l ~rrrr-rrr;-,-,-f,~~2 ~-9rr4,--;ni'l"Fr.,.,..,"'l'ffFFFF'FT'l"T~--rrr;-;-n-TTTI~TTTrn-r~1~7-n7~- 9 > 7 6 .6
`
`4.76
`
`1 0~ ],~~--rrrP~A~~~~]TTT~~~rrn-~~~,.~:'--rn-~-n"TTTTj'TTTT'f"TTT"rrrrrrn-~~~~~1"3-n4~-~7 > 90.8
`
`3.22
`
`3.31
`10~ ~
`BA
`(\
`0 '6, ~~-~~~~-~~----....-i-~~,--,--;o;.~~-------~~-Time
`
`0.50
`
`1.00
`
`1.50
`
`2.00
`
`2.50
`
`3.00
`
`3.50
`
`4.00
`
`4.50
`
`5.00
`
`5.50
`
`120.7 > 76.6
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1026
`Par v. Horizon, IPR of Patent No. 9,561,197
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`J Inherit Metab Dis (2010) 33 (Suppl 3):S321-S328
`
`S325
`
`12000
`
`10000
`
`BA
`
`8000
`
`Cl)
`1/)
`s:::
`0 c.. 6000
`Cl) a:
`
`1/)
`
`4000
`
`2000
`
`0
`
`0
`
`10000
`
`8000
`
`6000
`
`4000
`
`2000
`
`PBA
`
`•
`
`Pure solvent
`y = 0.8825x - 10.022
`R2 = 0.9976
`
`Plasma
`y = 0.7553x- 33.256
`R2 = 0.9987
`
`PAA
`
`60000
`
`50000
`
`40000
`
`30000
`
`20000
`
`10000
`
`Cl)
`1/)
`s:::
`0 c..
`Cl) a:
`
`1/)
`
`Pure solvent
`y = 5.4963x + 682.72
`R2 = 0.9942
`
`Plasma
`y = 5.6652x- 188.23
`R2 = 0.9935
`
`Cl)
`
`1/) s:::
`0 c..
`Cl) a:
`
`1/)
`
`Pure solvent
`y = 1.1138x + 40.527
`R2 = 0.9996
`
`Plasma
`y = 0.9574x + 304.74
`R2 = 0.9941
`
`10000
`5000
`[ng/ml]
`
`15000
`
`0
`
`0
`
`10000
`5000
`[ng/ml]
`
`15000
`
`0
`
`0
`
`10000
`5000
`[ng/ml]
`
`15000
`
`17500
`
`15000
`
`HA
`
`Cl)
`1/)
`s:::
`0 c..
`Cl) a:
`
`1/)
`
`12500
`
`10000
`
`7500
`
`5000
`
`2500
`
`Pure solvent
`y = 1.5847x + 77.226
`R2 = 0.9988
`Plasma
`y = 1.427x + 548.29
`R2 = 0.9802
`
`0
`
`0
`
`5000
`
`10000
`
`15000
`
`[ng/ml)
`
`6000
`
`5000
`
`PAG
`
`Cl) 4000
`1/)
`s:::
`0
`m- 3000
`a:
`
`2000
`
`Pure solvent
`y = 0.5188x + 7.2338
`R2 = 0.9985
`
`1000
`
`Plasma
`y = 0.4928x + 64.828
`R2 = 0.9956
`0 +-------,-------,-------,
`0
`5000
`10000
`15000
`
`[ng/ml]
`
`Fig. 3 Calibration curves of benzoate (BA), phenylacetate (PAA), and phenyl butyrate (PBA) and their metabolites phenylacetylglutamine (PAG)
`and hippuric acid (HA) in plasma ( .._) and pure solvent ( •)
`
`Regression equations of plasma probes and standard
`solutions (pure solvent) are depicted in Fig. 3. LLOD
`values for the target analytes were 28-34 ng/ml (0.1-
`0.3 ~J.mol/L), whereas LLOQ values were 100 ng/ml (0.3-
`0.8 ~J.mol/L).
`
`up to 3 days. Furthermore, samples were found to be stable
`after three freeze/thaw cycles. No analyte degraded under
`the assay conditions for at least 72 h in the autosampler.
`
`Clinical application of the method
`
`Precision, recovery, and stability
`
`Precision and recovery data for each analyte are summa(cid:173)
`rized in Table 2. Mean recovery of all analytes was >90%
`(range 95-103%). The intra- and interassay precisions were
`highly satisfactory, with all relative size distribution (RSD)
`values being <10%. Ranges were 3.2-7.3% and 3.1-7.0%
`for within- and between-day, respectively.
`All analytes in the samples were found to be stable in
`plasma and urine when stored at -2ooc for 3 months and
`were also stable when incubated at ooc as well as at RT for
`
`A preliminary study for determining PBA, PAA, PAG, HA,
`and BA in plasma and urine samples demonstrated the
`clinical applicability of the assay for therapeutic monitor(cid:173)
`ing. In total, 12 patients with hyperammonemia due to
`various inborn errors of urea synthesis were studied.
`Ornithine transcarbamoylase deficiency (six patients), argi(cid:173)
`ninosuccinate synthetase deficiency (three patients), and
`arginase deficiency (three patients) were treated with BA
`alone or in combination with PBA in doses of 1.5-6 g/d.
`Blood and urine samples were taken approximately 2-4
`h after intake. In patients receiving either PBA alone (nine
`
`~Springer
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1026
`Par v. Horizon, IPR of Patent No. 9,561,197
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`S326
`
`J Inherit Metab Dis (2010) 33 (Suppl3):S321-S328
`
`Table 2 Accmacy, precision, and recovery data for plasma and urine samples
`
`Calibration range
`(J.tmol/L)
`
`Amount added
`(J.tmol!L)
`
`Recovery run (n=20)
`(%)
`
`Within-run (n=5)
`(% RSD)
`
`Between-run
`(% RSD)
`
`BA (plasma)
`
`0.08- 82.5
`
`PAA (plasma)
`
`0.07- 73.4
`
`PBA (plasma)
`
`0.06-61.0
`
`HA (urine)
`
`0.06-55.8
`
`PAG (mine)
`
`0.04- 37.8
`
`2.6
`20.5
`81.9
`2.3
`18.4
`73.6
`1.9
`15.2
`60.8
`1.7
`13.9
`55.7
`1.2
`9.4
`37.7
`
`98
`99
`98
`96
`97
`101
`105
`99
`104
`95
`99
`99
`105
`98
`98
`
`4.0
`3.4
`3.7
`3.4
`4.7
`3.9
`4.2
`5.1
`6.3
`6.2
`7.3
`3.2
`4.1
`3.2
`3.2
`
`3.1
`3.9
`4.2
`4.7
`5.3
`5.0
`4.4
`7.0
`4.3
`5.8
`6.3
`2.9
`3.8
`2.8
`3.4
`
`Pooled mine/plasma calibrators were used to analyze target analytes
`BA benzoic acid, PAA phenylacetic acid, PBA phenyl butyric acid, HA hippmic acid, PAG phenylacetylglutamine, RSD relative standard deviations
`
`patients) or in combination with BA (three patients), plasma
`levels of PAA, PBA, and PAG were within the ranges of
`100-250, 10-300, and 200-650 1-1-mol/L, respectively. For
`the three patients who received BA in addition to PBA,
`plasma BA was in the range of 9-59.2 1-1-mol/L. Moreover,
`plasma HA was high in these patients (range 50-160 1-1-mol/
`L). In urine of BA-treated patients, concentrations of HA
`were highly increased, range 6,000-30,000 mmol/mol
`creatinine. These high concentrations of HP demonstrate
`its clinical purpose for disposition of waste nitrogen. Urine
`BA levels of patients receiving BA was 14- 107 mmol/mol
`creatinine. In patients receiving either PAG alone or in
`combination with BA, urinary levels of PAA, PBA, and
`PAG were in the ranges of 20-200, 12-411, and 800-
`20,000 mmollmol creatinine, respectively. These findings,
`on a limited number of unselected patients, obviously do
`not represent reference values, but clearly demonstrate the
`applicability of the method.
`
`Discussion
`
`Knowledge of concentrations ofBA, PAA, and PBA and their
`metabolites HA and PAG in urine and blood is a prerequisite
`for detailed studies on their metabolism as well as for
`pharmacokinetic and evaluation studies. In children with
`inborn errors of urea synthesis, individual dosage and therapy
`optimization are highly important as, for instance, higher
`doses of BA are known to be toxic (Van Hove et al. 2005).
`
`~Springer
`
`Coadministration of BA and PBA necessitates the
`simultaneous determination of these compounds and their
`major metabolites in a single run (Thibault et al. 1994b; Yu
`et al. 2001 ). Pharmacokinetics studies on individual as well
`as coadministered sodium PAA and sodium BA have been
`described in the literature (Camacho et al. 2007; Carducci et
`al. 2001 ; Kubota and Ishizaki 1991 ; MacArthur et al. 2004;
`Piscitelli et al. 1995; Thibault et al. 1994a). These studies
`were conducted mostly by intravenous administration of the
`compounds, and the results cannot necessarily be extended
`to oral administration, which is common practice nowa(cid:173)
`days. Further well-designed studies are thus called for to
`optimize levels for maximum elimination of waste nitrogen
`while keeping plasma and urine concentrations below
`levels associated with adverse effects. Requirement for
`such studies will be the determination of the analytes and
`their metabolites in both plasma as well as urine samples.
`Our goal was to develop an easy-to-operate and
`validated method for quantifying BA, PAA, and PBA and
`their metabolites HA and PAG in plasma and urine. The
`newly developed method described here offers the advan(cid:173)
`tage of a 7 -min run time for simultaneous quantitation of all
`five target analytes. The strength of the method is the
`simple sample extraction procedure and the increased
`reliability of quantification using deuterated IS. For the
`chromatographic procedure, we tested several combinations
`of columns and different mobile phases with different pH
`ranges. Careful selection of pH and water/methanol amount
`in the mobile phase was found to be highly effective for
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1026
`Par v. Horizon, IPR of Patent No. 9,561,197
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`J Inherit Metab Dis (2010) 33 (Suppl 3):S321-S328
`
`S327
`
`satisfactory separation of the analytes. A Phenomenex
`Gemini NX column allowed for good chromatographic
`peak shape and acceptable retention times of the analytes.
`The applied isocratic mobile phase (methanol 0.01% formic
`acid, 65:35 v/v) allowed sufficient separation and good
`symmetry of the compounds. Compounds PAG/HA and
`PAA/BA showed similar retention times on the chromato(cid:173)
`graphic peak scale. This, however, did not affect their
`quantification due to different precursor and product ions.
`With the parent and daughter ions of each analyte being
`monitored in SRM mode, the method yielded a mean
`recovery >90% for all analytes. Parent and daughter ion
`selection was achieved by acquiring full-scan mass spectra
`of each analyte using ESI-negative ion mode, as all
`analyzed compounds were found to exhibit much better
`ionization efficiency in that mode.
`Special attention is necessary to evaluate matrix effects
`when developing a quantitative LC-MS/MS method.
`Coeluting, undetected compounds originating from the
`plasma or urine matrix can cause signal suppression or
`enhancement. Hence, matrix effect can affect the accuracy
`and reproducibility of the developed quantitative method.
`The effect of the matrix is also strongly dependent on the
`degree of sample cleanup (selective extraction) and degree
`of chromatographic separation and retention of the analytes
`on the HPLC column. Optimizing these two effects may
`improve significantly the efficiency and reproducibility of
`the electrospray ionization process occurring in the ion
`source of the mass spectrometer. On the other hand,
`extensive sample preparation methods are not desirable in
`clinical applications due to the labor-intensive and time(cid:173)
`consuming process. One method, which is still employed
`during LC-MS/MS experiments to control matrix effects, is
`the use of labelled IS. These stable isotopically labelled
`analogues are believed to be the most appropriate IS in the
`quantitative LC-MS/MS due to their nearly identical
`physicochemical properties to the unlabeled target analytes.
`They should not only help in correcting sample preparation
`during the extraction procedure, but also help for compen(cid:173)
`sating the variable MS response in ESI. In many cases,
`stable isotopically labelled analogues as IS are not always
`available. Fortunately, we obtained for this method all five
`target analytes in the form of the deuterated analogues. By
`using an appropriate concentration of the deuterated IS, the
`precision and accuracy of the method were adequate to
`support our clinical applications.
`This newly developed method was successful in a
`preliminary study on determining PBA, PAA, PAG, HA,
`and BA in patient plasma and urine samples, clearly
`demonstrating the clinical applicability of our assay.
`Furthermore, therapeutic monitoring of the analytes may
`well be relevant in cancer research because PAA and PBA
`have been found to suppress tumour growth and promote
`
`cellular differentiation in multiple tumour models (Camacho
`et al. 2007; Carducci et al. 2001 ; Piscitelli et al. 1995; Samid
`et al. 1992; Thibault et al. 1994a).
`In conclusion, a robust, fast, and sensitive LC-MS/MS
`method has been developed to simultaneously determine
`BA, PBA, PAA and their metabolites PAG and HA in
`human plasma and urine. The method offers rapid, accurate,
`and clinically useful means of monitoring the therapeutic
`course. Furthermore, this method can be applied for
`pharmacokinetic and toxicity studies.
`
`Acknowledgment The authors thank Dr. F. ter Veld for reviewing
`this manuscript
`
`References
`
`Batshaw ML (1983) Sodium benzoate and argmme: alternative
`pathway therapy in inborn errors of urea synthesis. Prog Clin
`Bioi Res 127:69- 83
`Brusilow SW (1991) Phenylacetylglutamine may replace urea as a
`vehicle for waste nitrogen excretion. Pediatr Res 29:147- 150
`Brusilow SW, Danney M, Waber LJ, Batshaw M, Burton B, Levitsky
`L, Roth K, McKeethren C, Ward J (1984) Treatment of episodic
`hyperammonemia in children with inborn errors of urea
`synthesis. N Eng! J Med 310:1630-1634
`Camacho LH, Olson J, Tong WP, Young CW, Spriggs DR, Malkin
`MG (2007) Phase I dose escalation clinical trial of phenyl(cid:173)
`butyrate sodium administered twice daily to patients with
`advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 25:131- 138
`Carducci MA, Gilbert J, Bowling MK, Noe D, Eisenberger MA,
`Sinibaldi V, Zabelina Y, Chen TL, Grochow LB, Donehower RC
`(2001) A Phase I clinical and pharmacological evaluation of
`sodium phenylbutyrate on an 120-h infusion schedule. Clin
`Cancer Res 7:3047- 3055
`Das AM, Illsinger S, Hartmarm H, Oehler K, Bohnhorst B, Kuhn(cid:173)
`Velten WN, Lucke T (2009) Prenatal benzoate treatment in urea
`cycle defects. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 94:F216- F217
`Enns GM, Berry SA, Berry GT, Rhead WJ, Brusilow SW, Hamosh A
`(2007) Survival after treatment with phenylacetate and benzoate
`for urea-cycle disorders. N Eng! J Med 356:2282- 2292
`Garg U, Dasouki M (2006) Expanded newborn screening of inherited
`metabolic disorders by tandem mass spectrometry: clinical and
`laboratory aspects. Clin Biochem 39:315- 332
`Hommes FA (1999) The assay of phenylacetic acid and 4-
`phenylbutyric acid in physiological fluids. Clin Chim Acta
`284:109- 111
`Kubota K, Ishizaki T (1991) Dose-dependent pharmacokinetics of
`benzoic acid following oral administration of sodium benzoate to
`humans. Eur J Clin Pharmacal 41:363- 368
`Kubota K, Horai Y, Kushida K, Ishizaki T (1988) Determination of
`benzoic acid and hippuric acid in human plasma and urine by
`high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 425:67-
`75
`MacArthur RB, Altincatal A, Tuchman M (2004) Pharmacokinetics of
`sodium phenylacetate and sodium benzoate following intrave(cid:173)
`nous administration as both a bolus and continuous infusion to
`healthy adult volunteers. Mol Genet Metab 81 (Suppl 1 ):S67- S73
`Piscitelli SC, Thibault A, Figg WD, Tompkins A, Headlee D,
`Lieberman R, Samid D, Myers CE (1995) Disposition of
`phenylbutyrate and its metabolites, phenylacetate and phenyl(cid:173)
`acetylglutamine. J Clin Pharmacal 35:368-373
`
`~Springer
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1026
`Par v. Horizon, IPR of Patent No. 9,561,197
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`

`S328
`
`J Inherit Metab Dis (2010) 33 (Suppl3):S321-S328
`
`Samid D, Shack S, Sherman LT (1992) Phenylacetate: a novel
`nontoxic inducer of tumor cell differentiation. Cancer Res
`52:1988- 1992
`Shih VE (2007) Alternative-pathway therapy for hyperammonemia. N
`Eng1 J Med 356:2321-2322
`Stein WH, Paladini AC, Hirs CHW, MooreS (1954) Pheny1acety1g1ut(cid:173)
`amine as a constituent of normal human urine. J Am Chern Soc
`76:2848- 2849
`Thibault A, Cooper MR, Figg WD, Venzon DJ, Sartor AO, Tompkins
`AC, Weinberger MS, Headlee DJ, McCall NA, Samid D (1994a)
`A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous phenyl(cid:173)
`acetate in patients with cancer. Cancer Res 54:1690-1694
`Thibault A, Figg WD, McCall N, Samid D, Myers CE, Cooper MR
`(1994b) A simultaneous assay of the differentiating agents,
`phenylacetic acid and phenylbutyric acid, and one of their
`metabolites, phenylacetyl-glutamine, by reversed-phase, high
`performance liquid chromatography. J Liq Chrom Rei Techno!
`17:2895-2900
`
`Van Hove JL, Vande KK, Hennermann JB, Mahieu V, Declercq P,
`Mertens S, De BM, Kishnani PS, Jaeken J (2005) Benzoate
`treatment and the glycine index in nonketotic hyperglycinaemia.
`J Inherit Metab Dis 28:651--663
`Webster LT, Siddiqui UA, Lucas SV, Strong JM, Mieyal JJ (1976)
`Identification of separate acyl- CoA:glycine and acyl-CoA:L(cid:173)
`glutamine N-acyltransferase activities in mitochondrial fractions
`from liver of rhesus monkey and man. J Bioi Chern 251:3352-
`3358
`Wilcken B (2004) Problems in the management of urea cycle
`disorders. Mol Genet Metab 8l(Suppl l):S86- S91
`Yu X, Thompson MM, Shi D, Tuchman M (2001) Quantification of
`benzoic, phenylacetic, and phenylbutyric acids from filter-paper
`blood spots by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with
`stable isotope dilution. Clin Chern 47:351-354
`Zimmerman L, Jomvall H, Bergstrom J (1990) Phenylacetylglutamine
`and hippuric-acid in uremic and healthy subjects. Nephron
`55:265-271
`
`~Springer
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1026
`Par v. Horizon, IPR of Patent No. 9,561,197
`Page 8 of 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket