throbber
The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL ofMEDICINE
`
`
`
`I
`
`ORIGINALARTICLE
`
`‘
`
`Efficacy ofLenalidomide in Myelodysplastic
`Syndromes
`
`Alan List, M.D., Sandy Kurtin, C.N.P., M.S., Denise]. Roe, Dr.P.H.,
`Andrew Buresh, M.D., Daruka Mahadevan, M.D., Ph.D., Deborah Fuchs, M.D.,
`
`Lisa Rimsza, M.D., Ruth Heaton, 35., Robert Knight, M.D.,
`andjerome B. Zeldis, M.D.
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`BA C K G R O U N D
`
`Ineffective erythropoiesis is the hallmark ofmyelodysplastic syndromes. Management
`of the anemia caused by ineffective erythropoiesis is difficult. In patients with myelo-
`dysplastic syndromes and symptomatic anemia, we evaluated the safety and hemato-
`logic activity oflenalidomide, a novel analogue ofthalidomide.
`
`M ET H O D S
`
`Forty-three patients with transfiision-dependent or symptomatic anemia received le-
`nalidOmide at doses of25 or 10 mg per day or of10 mg per day for 21 days ofevery 28-
`day cycle. All patients either had had no response to recombinant erythropoietin or had
`a high endogenous erythropoietin level with a low probability of benefit from such
`therapy. The response to treatmentwas assessed after 16 weeks.
`
`R E S U LTS
`
`Neutropenia and throm bocytopenia, the mo stcommon adverse events, with respective
`frequencies of65 percent and 74 percent, necessitated the interruption oftreatment or
`a dose reduction in 25 patients (58 percent). Other adverse events were mild and infre-
`quent. Twenty-four patients had a response (56 percent): 20 had sustained indepen-
`dence from transfusion, 1 had an increase in the hemoglobin level ofmore than 2 g per
`deciliter, and 3 had more than a 50 percent reduction in the need for transfiisions. The
`response rate was highest among patients with a clonal interstitial deletion involving
`chromosome 5q31.1 (83 percent, as compared with 57 percent among those with a
`normal karyotype and 12 percent among those with other karyotypic abnormalities;
`P=0.007) and patients with lower prognostic risk. Of20 patients with karyotypic ab-
`normalities, 11 had at leasta 50 percent reduction in abnormal cells in metaphase, in-
`cluding 10 (50 percent) with a complete cytogenetic remission. After a median follow-
`up of 81 weeks, the median duration of transfiision independence had not been
`reached and the median hemoglobin level was 13.2 g per deciliter (range, 11.5 to 15.8).
`
`C0 N CL U S IO N S
`
`Lenalidomide has hematologic activity in patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syn-
`dromes who have no response to erythropoietin or who are unlikely to benefit from
`conventional therapy.
`
`From the Department oflnterdisciplinary
`Oncology, University ofSouth Florida and
`the H. Lee Mofiitt Cancer Center and Re-
`search Institute. Tampa (A.L., R.H.); the
`Departments of Medicine and Pathology.
`University ofArizona College ofMedicine,
`Tucson (S.K., A.B.. D.M., D.F., LR.); the
`Mel and Enid Zuckerman Arizona College
`of Public Health, Tucson (D.J.R.); and Cel-
`gene, Warren, NJ. (R.K., 1.82.). Address
`reprint requests to Dr. List at the Hemato-
`logic Malignancies Program, SRB Rm.
`24038, H. Lee Mofiitt Cancer Center and
`Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr.,
`Tampa, FL 33612-9497, or at
`|istaf®
`mofiitt.usf.edu.
`
`N Engl] Med 2005;352:549-57.
`Copyright 0 2005 Massachusetts Meflwl Society.
`
`N ENC-L] MED 352:6 WWW.NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 10, 1005
`
`549
`
`edd
`r
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`'s Lagpraton‘es Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`Downloaded from nejmorg on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. he (filer ses wr
`°“‘ W‘s“- |PR2018-O1509
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029, Page 1
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL ofMEDICINE
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Il
`EFRACTORY ANEMIA RESULTING FROM
`til: .
`ineffective hematopmesxs is the pr1nc1pal
`.4
`4. 4 therapeutic challenge for patients with
`myelodysplastic syndromes.1 Recombinant eryth-
`ropoietin alone or in combination with myeloid
`growth factors ameliorates anemia in some patients
`but is generally ineffective in patients who require
`two or more red-cell transfitsions per month; its
`use rarely induces cytogenetic remissions?‘3
`Hematopoietic precursors in patients with mye-
`lodysplastic syndromes have an accelerated cell-
`cycle transition and impaired responsiveness to cy-
`tokine stimulation.“4 Survival signals from the
`microenvironment are compromised, owing in part
`to the presence ofangiogenic molecules, disruption
`of the medullary architecture, and excess produc-
`tion of inflammatory cytokines.5 1° Thalidomide, a
`multifunctional inhibitor of angiogenesis and an
`immune modulator, restores erythropoiesis and re-
`duces transfusion dependence in approximately 18
`percent of patients who have no response to re-
`combinanterythropoietin.11 1“ However, long-term
`treatment and dose escalation are limited by the
`drug’s sedative and neurologic effects. Lenalido-
`mide is a novel 4-amino-glutarimide analogue of
`thalidomide that is more potent but does not have
`the neurotoxic and teratogenic effects of thalido-
`mide.15 17 We report the results ofa safety and effi-
`cacy study of lenalidomide in patients with myelo-
`dysplastic syndromes.
`
`
`METHODS
`
`PATI E N TS
`
`Eligible patients had received a histologically con-
`firmed diagnosis of a primary myelodysplastic
`syndrome according to French—American—British
`(FAB) criteria (Fig. 1)18 more than three months
`before enrollment and a diagnosis ofeither symp-
`tomatic anemia (defined by a hemoglobin level of
`less than 10.0 gper deciliter) or transfiision-depen-
`dent anemia (defined by the need for at least4 units
`ofred cells within eight weeks before enrollment).
`Hematologic values obtained during the eightweeks
`preceding study treatment served as a reference
`for the assessment ofresponse. Patients either had
`had no response to treatment with recombinant
`erythropoietin or had an endogenous serum level
`of more than 500 mU per milliliter. Patients with
`severe neutropenia (defined by an absolute neutro-
`phil count ofless than 500 per cubic millimeter),
`
`severe thrombocytopenia (defined by a platelet
`count of less than 10,000 per cubic millimeter),
`treatment-related myelodysplastic syndromes, or
`clinically significant coexisting medical illnesses
`were excluded.
`
`STU DY D E S I G N
`
`This open-label, single-center trial evaluated the
`safety and efficacy oflenalidomide in patients with
`myelodysplastic syndromes who had symptomatic
`anemia. All patients gave written informed consent,
`and the study was approved by the institutional re-
`view board ofthe University ofArizona. The princi-
`pal investigator designed and conducted the study,
`analyzed the data, and wrote the article in consulta-
`tion with Celgene. Lenalidomide (Revlimid) was
`supplied by Celgene as S-mg or 25-mg capsules.
`Three oral dosing schedules were sequentially evalu-
`ated: 25 mgdaily, 10 mgdaily, and 10 mg daily for21
`days ofevery 28-day cycle. Treatmentwas interrupt-
`ed in the event ofadverse events ofgrade 3 or higher
`according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the
`National Cancer Institute and resumed at the next
`lower dose afier the resolution of these effects.19
`
`Sequential dose reductions were as follows: 10 mg
`per day, 10 mg per day for 21 days, 5 mg per day,
`5 mg per day for 21 days, and 5 mg every other day.
`Complete blood counts were obtained every two
`weeks, with the response to treatment and adverse
`events assessed every four weeks. Bone marrow as-
`piration, biopsy, and cytogenetic analysis were re-
`peated every eight weeks. The final response was
`assessed after 16 weeks oftherapy. Patients with a
`response continued taking lenalidomide until dis-
`ease progression, treatment failure, or dose-limiting
`adverse events occurred. Patients with hemato-
`
`logic improvement that did not qualify as a proto-
`col-defined response after 16 weeks could receive
`8 additional weeks of treatment before the final
`
`assessment of response, whereas patients with-
`out a response who had been following the 21-day
`treatment schedule were offered continual dosing.
`Red-cell transfusions were administered accord-
`
`ing to prestudy clinical indicators with the following
`guidelines: 2 units were given to patients with a he-
`matocrit of less than 25 percent, 3 units to those
`with a hematocrit ofless than 21 percent, and 4 units
`to those with a hematocrit of less than 18 percent.
`Myeloid growth factors for the management of an
`exacerbation of neutropenia were the only cyto-
`kines permitted.
`
`550
`
`N ENC-L] MED 352:6 WWW.NE]M.ORG FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`edd '5 La oratones Inc v Cel ene Cor
`r
`The New England meal Of Media“
`Downloaded from nejmorg on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. he 0%18f ses WIBJOUt permissroh. lPR2%18-0150%
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029 Page 2
`
`

`

`LENALIDOMIDE FOR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES
`
`
`
`Figure 1. Characteristic of Myelodyaplaatic Syndorns.
`The bone marrow aspirate in patients with rnyelodysplasia is hypercellular. reflecting trilineal dysplasia (Panel A: Wright—
`Giemsa stain). In this specimen. hypolobated megalraryocytes and hyposegmented neutrophils are prominent. Myeloid
`maturation is sh ilted to the left. and rrryeloblasts may be increased. as shown in Panel B in a patient with refractory
`anemia with excess blasts (Wright-Giemsa stain). Dyserythropoiesis accompanies the hypolobated megakaryocytes and
`hyposegmerrted neutrophils. There may be a left-sided shift in erythroid maturation, nuclear budding. megaloblastic
`changes. and as shown in Panel C, a decrease in the number of erythroid precursors (Wright-Giemsa stain). The cellu-
`Iarity ofa core-biopsy specimen can approach 100 percent. with readily apparent dysplasia (Panel D: hematoxylin and
`eosin). (Provided by Lynn Moscinski, M.D.. H. Lee Mofiitt Cancer Center and Research Institute. Tampa, Fla.)
`
`ASSESSM EN'I' OF RESPONSE AND ADVERSE EVENTS
`
`The hematologic response was assessed according
`to the modified criteria ofthe International Working
`Group, with the requirement that an improvement
`had to be sustained for at least eight consecutive
`weeks.20 A major erythroid response was defined
`as freedom from the need for transfusion or an in-
`
`crease in the hemoglobin level ofmore than 2 g per
`deciliter in patients with transfusion-independent
`anemia. A minor response was defined as at least a
`50 percent reduction in transfitsions or a sustained
`elevation in the hemoglobin level of 1 to 2 g per
`deciliter. A major cytogenetic response was defined
`by the absence of the pretreatment cytogenetic ab-
`normalityon standard metaphase analysis (e.g. , at
`least 20 cells in metaphase), and a minor response
`
`by a reduction in the number of abnormal cells in
`metaphase ofat least 50 percent. Cytogenetic pro-
`gression was defined as the sustained acquisition
`ofa new chromosomal abnormality.
`Responses were compared bymeans ofthe Inter-
`national Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), which
`assesses the percentage ofblasts in bone marrow,
`the karyotype, and the number of cytopenias.21
`Blinded review ofbone marrow specimens was per-
`formed by two investigators. Immunohistochemi-
`cal staining ofbiopsy specimens and clot sections
`used monoclonal antibodies against IgGZa (Ven-
`tana Medical Systems) recognizing CD3 (PSI clone)
`and CD20 (L26 clone) antigens. Cytologic dyspla-
`sia was graded with the use ofa 10 percent thresh-
`old. Adverse events were gtaded with the use ofthe
`
`N mar.) MED 352:6 wwwmqmonc
`
`renunv to, 2005
`
`551
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`r.
`edd s L
`oratories Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`R0 (5m £5 wr out pennissron. lPR2018—01509
`Downloaded from nejmorg on September 26, 2018. For personal use only.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029, Page 3
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL ofMEDICINE
`
`Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer
`Institute.19
`
`Table 1. Clinical and Hematologic Characteristis
`ofthe 43 Patients.":
`
`STATISTICA L A NA LYSIS
`
`Characteristic
`
`The duration oftmnsfiision independence was cal-
`culated from the date ofthe last red-cell transfilsion
`
`u) the resumption of transfusion through April 1,
`2004, according to the method of Kaplan and Mei-
`er.22 The duration of major responses in transfu-
`sion-independent patients was recorded from the
`initial data of the sustained elevation in hemoglo-
`bin levels of more than 2 g per deciliter. The analy-
`ses ofadverse events and response were carried out
`according to the intention-to-treat principle. Uni-
`variate comparisons were performed with the use
`of Fisher's exact test, a two-sample independent
`t-test, or a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The duration
`
`oftransfusion independence was com pared among
`the groups by means ofthe log-ranktest. All report-
`ed P values are two-sided. Data are reported as me-
`dians iSD.
`
`
`RESULTS
`
`From March 2002 to August 2003, 55 candidates
`were screened and 43 were enrolled. Thirty-three
`patients (77 percent) had refractory anemia or re-
`fractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts, and 38
`(88 percent) had IPSS risk scores oflow or interme-
`diate 1 (Table 1). Overall, 74 percent were transfu-
`sion-dependent, 33 (77 percent) had had no re-
`sponse to treatment with erythropoietin, and 13 (30
`percent) had had no response to treatment with
`thalidomide. None had received cytotoxic therapy.
`The median number ofprior nontransfilsion treat-
`ments was 1.7 (range, 0 to 5). Moderate-to-severe
`neutropenia was present in 28 percent of patients,
`and moderate-to-severe thrombocytopenia in 23
`percent of patients; 37 percent had at least two
`cytopenias. Twenty patients (46 percent) had clonal
`laryotypic abnormalities (defined by the presence
`of at least two abnormal cells in metaphase),
`including interstitial deletions of chromosome
`5q31.1 alone (11 patients) or in association with
`trisomy 21 (1), an interstitial deletion of chromo-
`some 20q11.2 (2), a complex karyotype (1), and
`other abnormalities (5).
`
`ADVERSE EVE NTS
`
`Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most
`common adverse events (Table 2). Severe myelo-
`suppression (grade 3 or higher) was dose-depen-
`
`Age — yr
`Median
`
`Range
`
`Sex — no. (96)
`
`Male
`
`Female
`
`FAB class — no. (96)
`
`Refractory anemia
`
`72
`
`28-85
`
`25 (58)
`
`18 (42)
`
`20 (47)
`
`Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts
`
`13 (30)
`
`Refractory anemia with excess blasts
`
`Refractory anemia with excess blasts
`in transformation
`
`Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
`
`IPSS risk category— no. (96)
`Low
`
`Intermediate 1
`
`Intermediate 2
`
`High
`Transfusion dependence
`
`No. (96)
`
`8 (19)
`
`1 (2)
`
`1 (2)
`
`22 (51)
`
`16 (37)
`
`4 (9)
`
`1 (2)
`
`32 (74)
`
`Median no. of red-cell units transfused/mo
`
`3
`
`Range
`
`2-6
`
`Pretransfusion hemoglobin level — g/dl
`
`Transfusion-dependent patients
`Median
`
`
`
`Range
`Other
`
`Median
`
`Range
`Duration of disease — mo
`Median
`
`Range
`
`Neutropenia — no. (%)1‘
`
`Thrombocytopenia —no. (96):
`Karyotype — no. (96)
`
`Normal
`
`29
`
`3-169
`
`12 (28)
`
`10 (23)
`
`23 (53)
`
`Abnormal
`
`20 (47)
`
`* FAB denotes French—American—British, and IPSS Inter-
`national Prognostic Scoring System.
`1 Neutropenia was defined by an absolute neutrophil
`count ofless than 1500 per cubic millimeter.
`iThrombocytopenia was defined by a platelet count of
`less than 100,000 per cubic millimeter.
`
`552
`
`N ENC-L] MED 352:6 WWW.NE]M.ORG FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`f 585 W]
`r.
`edd '5 La oratones Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`iao 51c
`Iiiiout permissron.
`|PR201 8-01 509
`Downloaded from nejmorg on September 26, 2018. For personal use only.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029, Page 4
`
`

`

`LENALIDOMIDE FOR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES
`
`Table 2. Treatment-Associated Adverse Events.
`
`Autoimmune hemolytic anemia
`HHHOOOHOOOU‘NO
`OOHNOOHH#N#A°
`OOOONONONmqu
`OOOOOD—‘OHOOON
`OOOOONOD—‘OD—‘ON
`OOOOOOOOOOOO
`
`Adverse Event
`
`Neutropenia
`
`Thrombocytopenia
`Pruritus
`
`Diarrhea
`
`Urticaria
`
`Fatigue
`
`Bone pain
`Pneumonia
`
`Edema
`
`Hypothyroidism
`
`Hypogonadism
`Myalgias
`
`Lenalidomide,
`25 mglday
`(N= 13)
`Grade Grade
`lor2 30r4
`
`Lenalidomide,
`10 mglday
`(N=l3)
`Grade Grade
`lor2 3or4
`
`Lenalidomide,
`10 mglday for 21 days
`(N=l7)
`Grade Grade
`lor2 30r4
`
`All Patients,
`Any Grade
`(N=43)
`
`HO
`
`number (3‘patients
`8
`
`HO
`
`no. ofpatients (96)
`28 (65)
`
`32 (74)
`
`12 (28)
`
`9 (21)
`
`6 (14)
`
`3 (7)
`
`4 (9)
`
`3 (7)
`
`2 (5)
`
`2 (5)
`
`2 (5)
`
`1 (2)
`
`1 (2)
`
`dent and necessitated treatment interruption or
`dose reduction in 25 patients (58 percent). Treat-
`ment was interrupted because of myelosuppres-
`sion in 77 percent of patients in the 25-mg group
`after a median of4.6 weeks (range, 3 to 9), as com-
`pared with 62 percent ofthose who were receiving
`10 mgdaily (median, 8.5 weeks; range, 2 to 20) and
`47 percent ofthose who were receiving 10 mg daily
`for 21 days (median, 6 weeks; range, 1 to 11) (P:
`0.62). The median interval between the first inter-
`
`ruption of treatment and the resumption of treat-
`ment was 22 days in each cohort (range, 9 to 55).
`At week 8, marrow cellularity was reduced by 75
`percent among patients who were receiving 25 mg
`oflenalidomide per day, as compared with a reduc-
`tion of12 percent in both 10-mg cohorts. Pneumo-
`nia developed in three patients, one ofwhom had
`worsening ofpreexisting neutropenia. One patient
`was removed from the study on day S because ofau-
`mimmune hemolytic anemia with escalating trans-
`filsion requirements that preceded enrollment in
`the study. There were three deaths, none ofwhich
`were thought to be treatment-related: one was due
`to cholecystitis with rupture (day 8), one to splenic
`infarct in a patient with massive splenomegaly (day
`S) and a history ofsuch events, and one to pneumo-
`nia without neutropenia (week 20). All other ad-
`
`verse events were either minor or of moderate se-
`
`verity.
`Pruritus, generally self-limited and restricted to
`the scalp, was reported by 28 percent of patients
`during the first week of treatment. Isolated and
`transient urticaria was reported by 14 percent of
`patients, whereas a systemic rash with an urticarial
`component developed in one patient and resolved
`after treatmentwas interrupted. Diarrhea occurred
`in 21 percent ofpatients after prolonged treatment
`(more than three months) but was manageable with
`the use of either medication for diarrhea or the in-
`
`terruption of treatment with lenalidomide. Four
`patients required hormone replacement— two for
`hypothyroidism, and two for gonadal dysfilnction.
`Seven patients discontinued lenalidomide prema-
`turely (before 28 days) because of withdrawal of
`consent by three patients, autoimmune hemolytic
`anemia in one, early myelosuppression in one, and
`early death in two.
`
`HEMATOLOGIC RESPONSE
`
`Twenty-four patients (56 percent) had a response
`(Table 3); 20 of32 transfusion-dependent patients
`(63 percent) achieved independence from transfu-
`sion. Of 11 patients who required no transfusions,
`1 had an increase in the hemoglobin level of more
`
`N ENGLJ MED 352;6 WWW.N
`
`EJM.ORG
`
`FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`553
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejmorg on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. Q3519? sesslwaigggttggrensfislsqghyIPC|§£%irffoc1:ggg
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029 Page 5
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL ofMEDICINE
`
`Lena'idomide
`0°“
`
`N°- 0"
`Mien“
`
`25 "IE/day
`1° mgldaY
`10 "ZIIZ/dda)’ ‘0'
`ays
`Total
`
`.
`'5'”th R°SP°"S°
`Maior Minor
`Total
`"umber (Mum)
`0
`6 (45)
`1
`7 (54)
`2
`11 (55)
`3 (7)
`24 (56)
`
`6
`5
`9
`21 (49)
`
`w°°ks °° Ram's"
`Median iSD Range
`
`9-°*-"-“
`105*“
`115*10-3
`
`2-5-13-5
`2‘17-5
`6-24
`
`_— than 2 g per deciliter. The median time to a response
`increased item 9 weeks in the 25-mg cohort to
`11.5 weeks in the cohort given 10 mg per day for 21
`days. Patients with a major response reached a me-
`dian hemoglobin level of 13.2i1.4 g per deciliter
`(range, 11.5 to 15.8), with acorres ponding median
`increase in hemoglobin fiom baseline of 5.3 g per
`deciliter (range, 4.4 to 8.7). After a median follow-
`up of81 weeks (range, 42 to 110), the median dura-
`tion of the major response had not been reached
`(more than 48 weeks; range, more than 13 to more
`than 101). Among the 21 patients with a major re-
`sponse, anemia recurred in 4, with the resumption
`oftransfusions after intervals of 12, 19, 56, and 74
`weeks. In one of these patients, treatment aunt-e
`
`was associated with laryotypic evolution and sub- No. of
`
`Table 4. Ralafion between Clinical and BMOgiC Futures and Erythroid
`"Sims“
`
`Vi'iabh
`
`Sex
`
`Male
`Female
`Racei
`White
`Other
`
`Prior recombinant erYthFOPOieti"
`Yes
`No
`Prior thalidomide
`Yes
`“0
`'
`FAB Class
`Raf'a‘m')’ anem'a
`Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts
`Refractory anemia with excess blasts.
`with or without transformation
`.
`.
`.
`Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
`IPSS risk category
`Low
`Intermediate 1
`Intermediate 2 or high
`Karyotype
`Del
`(5)(q31-1)
`Normal
`Other
`2 Grade 3 myelosuppression
`Yes
`No
`
`P
`Erythroid
`”“9““ R"W‘s“ “I“?
`no. (96)
`
`0-35
`
`12 (48)
`12 (67)
`
`20 (54)
`4(67)
`
`15 (43)
`8 (80)
`
`6 (4‘)
`18 (6°)
`
`15 (75)
`6 (46)
`3 (33)
`
`0
`15 (68)
`8 (50)
`1 (20)
`
`1° (33)
`13 (57)
`1 (12)
`
`14 (56)
`10 (56)
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`.
`
`sequent progression to leukemia.
`Of 10 patients with moderate-to-severe throm-
`bocytopenia, 1 had a sustained improvement in the
`platelet count (i.e., an increase ofmore than 30,000
`per cubic millimeter). Of the 12 patients with neu-
`tropenia, 2 had a sustained increase in the neutro-
`phil count ofmore than 500 per cubic millimeter.
`
`CYTOGENETIC FINDINGS
`
`The cytogenetic pattern correlated significantly with
`the hematologic response: 83 percent of patients
`with a deletion of5q31.1 had a response, as com-
`pared with 57 percent ofthose with a normal kary-
`otype and 12 percent ofthose with other cytogenetic
`abnormalities (P=0.007) (Table 4). The FAB cate-
`gory had no significant correlation with response
`(P=0.07), nor did the IPSS risk category, age, dura-
`tion of disease, 01‘ number Of prior treatments
`(Table 4). The median time to a response was
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`more rapid in patients With a deletion of 5q31.1
`(8 0i4 4
`k _
`2 5t 16 0) d1
`.
`[1
`t
`..
`. wee 5, range,
`.
`o
`.
`an in pa en 5
`With a normal karyotype or other karyotyprc ab-
`normalities (11.2i6.7 weeks; range, 2.0 to 26.0;
`P=0'029)'
`_
`_
`_
`Among 20 panents wrth clonal cytogenetic ab-
`normalities, 11 had cyto enetic responses, includ-
`g
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`mg 10 wrth a complete cytogenetic remisswn (Table
`5). Of these 10 patlents, 9 had del(5)(q31.1) and
`1 had t(1;22)(q21p11.2). All cytogenetic respons-
`es occurred in patlents who also had a hematologic
`response. Overall, 10 of 12 patients (83 percent)
`with a 5q31.1 deletion had a cytogenetic response.
`Fluorescence in situ hybridization with the use
`of the Sq31 (EGR1X2)-specific probe (Vysis) con-
`firmed the absence 0f the 5q31'1 deletion among
`200 cells in interphase in each offive patients who
`
`* FAB denotes French—American—British, and IPSS Intemational Prognostic
`Scoring System
`1 Fisher's exact test was used.
`1 Race was determined from patient registration forms.
`
`554
`
`N ENC-L] MED 352:6 WWW.NE]M.ORG FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`,
`.
`Downloaded from nejmorg on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. i3!) 51eedrd sesslivaiiiggttggrensfislsqgny||3Cl§£%irffoc1:gi)%
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029 Page 6
`
`

`

`LENALIDOMIDE FOR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES
`
`Table 5. Cytogenetic Responsc According to Chromosomal Abnormality.
`
`had a complete response and who were evaluated
`by means ofstandard metaphase analysis.
`The median time to a cytogenetic response was
`8 weeks (range, 8 to 24). Of10 patientswith a 5q31.1
`deletion, 9 had a cytogenetic response after 8 weeks,
`whereas 1 patient had a response at 16 weeks. Four
`patients had transient emergence ofkaryotypically
`unrelated clones, including trisomy 8 (in two), a
`reciprocal translocation [t(12;16)(p13;p13. 3)], and
`monosomy 7. Sustained acquisition ofkaryotypical-
`ly discordant clones occurred in four patients: three
`patients with remitting disease and a Sq31.1 dele-
`tion had translocations involving the long arm of
`chromosome 7 [t(7;11)(q22;q12), t(7;8)(q22;p21),
`and t(7;21)(q31q11.1)] and one patient with a nor-
`mal karyotype before treatment had deletion 20
`(q21q13.1). Only one ofthese four patients had an
`exacerbation of anemia coincident with the ap-
`pearance of the new abnormality and subsequent
`evolution to acute leukemia. All others remained
`free ofthe need for trans fiision.
`
`PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSES
`AN D MORPHOLOGIC FINDINGS
`
`Among six patients with excess myeloblasts (at least
`5 percent; range, 6 to 21 percent) who could be
`evaluated, three had more than a 50 percent reduc-
`tion in blasts, with a return to the normal range.
`The percentage ofringed sideroblasts was reduced
`from 36 percent to 11 percent in 1 of 10 patients
`with refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts
`who could be evaluated. All reductions in myelo-
`blasts and sideroblasts occurred in patients with a
`hematologic response. Only one patient with re-
`fractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts had an in-
`crease in blasts during lenalidomide treatment,
`and this patient was removed from the study afier
`16 weeks.
`
`Serial marrow preparations from 28 patients
`were suitable for a detailed assessment ofdyspla-
`sia and architecture. The morphologic character-
`istics ofmegakaryocytes became normal after treat-
`ment with lenalidomide in 14 of 22 patients (64
`percent) with pretreatment dysplasia, including
`12 patients with a response; 10 ofthese 12 patients
`had a 5q31.1 deletion (Fig. 2). Lymphoid aggre-
`gates, often multiple and not paratrabecular, were
`detected in 10 of28 patients (36 percent) after le-
`nalidomide treatment (including 5 patients with a
`5q31. 1 deletion) and corresponded with a hemato-
`logic response in 7. Lymphoid aggregates were
`composed ofpolytypic B cells and T cells. Dysplas-
`
`Chromosomal Abnormality
`
`Del(5)(q31.1)
`Isolated
`
`With trisomy 21
`Del (20)(q1 1.2)
`t(1;22)(q21p11.2)
`Other*
`
`Total
`
`No. of
`Patients
`
`250% Decrease
`in Abnormal Cells
`in Metaphase
`
`Complete
`Cytogenetic
`Response
`
`number ofpatients (percent)
`10 (83)
`9 (75)
`
`11 (55)
`
`10 (50)
`
`* Other chromosomal abnormalities were as follows: +19, t(3;3)921;q26.3).
`+8. —X. and complex.
`
`
`
`
`
`apparent (Panel C, hematoxylin and eosin).
`
`Figure 2. Morphologic Changes in a Bone Marrow Specimen from a Patient
`with a 5q31J. Deletion.
`Numerous small, mononuclear megakaryocytes are readily identified in the
`bone marrow specimen obtained bytrephine biopsy before treatment (Panel
`A. hematoxylin and eosin). Alter 16 weeks of lenalidomide therapy, megakary-
`ocytes appear normal in size and have multiple nuclei (Panel B, hematoxylin
`and eosin). and multiple aggregates of benign-appearing lymphocytes are
`
`tic erythroid elements and myeloid elements were
`common (present in 22 and 11 patients, respec-
`tively), whereas resolution of cytologic atypia was
`infrequent (occurring in 2) and unrelated to hema-
`tologic response. Reticulin fibrosis resolved after
`lenalidomide treatment in one oftwo patients with
`extensive fiber deposition in the pretreatment tre-
`phine-biopsy specimen, concordant with a hemato-
`logic response. Marrow or peripheral-blood eosin-
`ophilia or both (7.5 percent to 14 percent) developed
`in three patients, including two with a hematologic
`response.
`
`N ENGLJ MED 352;6 WWW.NEJM.0RC
`
`FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`555
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`r.
`edd '5 La oratories Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`£0 0%181' SCS Wlalout permissron. lPR2018-01509
`Downloaded from nejmorg on September 26, 2018. For personal use only.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029, Page 7
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL ofMEDICINE
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`In this study, lenalidomide had substantial activity
`in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes who
`had had no response to treatmentwith erythropoi-
`etin or who had high endogenous erythropoietin
`levels and therefore a low probability ofbenefit fiom
`erythropoietin treatment. Overall, 56 percent ofpa-
`tients had a response, with most having sustained
`independence fiom the need for transfiision and
`restoration ofhemoglobin to levels within or near
`the normal range. Cytogenetic remissions, which
`occur rarely with erythropoietin therapy, were ob-
`served in 55 percent of patients. The high rate of
`complete cytogenetic response in patients with a
`5q31. 1 deletion (75 percent), which was confirmed
`by more sensitive fluorescence in situ hybridiza-
`tion probes, indicates that this subtype of myelo-
`dysplastic syndrome is especially sensitive to lena-
`lidomide treatment. Indeed, the time to response
`was more rapid in patients with the 5q3L1 dele-
`tion, and response was associated with the disap-
`pearance of dysplastic megakaryocytes, the mor-
`phologic hallmark of the Sq— syndrome.23 These
`findings suggest thatlenalidomide restores red-cell
`production in part by eliminating ineffective my-
`elodysplastic clones but does not extinguish the
`myelodysplastic syndrome—initiating stem cell.
`The persistence ofringed sideroblasts in patients
`with refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts
`who had a response, however, indicates that clonal
`suppression is selective and complemented by the
`restoration oferythropoiesis in susceptible myelo-
`dysplastic syndrome progenitors. This notion is
`supported by the transient emergence ofkaryotyp-
`ically distinct and unrelated clones, which mirrors
`the experience reported with imatinib treatment in
`patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.“25 In ad-
`dition, three patients with a 5q31.1 deletion acquired
`new translocations involvingchromosome 7 despite
`the complete suppression of the initial karyotypic
`abnormality. Despite its unfavorable prognostic im-
`plication in primary myelodysplastic syndromes,
`the clinical significance ofthe acquired transloca-
`tions is unclear. Only one ofthese patients had cyto-
`genetic and disease progression, whereas the oth-
`ers had a sustained hematologic response. Further
`observation is necessary before the clinical signifi-
`cance ofthese findings can be determined.
`Several effects of lenalidomide may contribute
`to its activity in myelodysplastic syndromes. It sup-
`presses the production of tumor necrosis factora
`
`(INF-a), but selective antagonists of TNF-a have
`minimal clinical activity in myelodys plastic syn-
`dromes." 2‘ Lenalidomide affects a broad range of
`ligand-induced responses that may be integral to
`its activity in myelodysplastic syndromes, includ-
`ing angiogenesis, inflammation, cell adhesion, and
`the immune response. Indeed, vascular endothe-
`lial growth factor (VEGF) is an autocrine growth
`factor elaborated by myeloid precursors in my-
`elodysplastic syndromes that contributes to their
`self-renewal while exacerbating ineffective erythro-
`poiesis in erythroid progenitors, which lack VEGF
`receptors",29 Lenalidomide enhances cell-mediat-
`ed immunity by potentiating the production ofin-
`terleukin-2 and interferon-y and increasing the re-
`sponses of cytolytic T cells and natural killer cells
`in experiments in animals.15’1° Of particular inter-
`est in our study was the appearance ofmultiple lym-
`phoid aggregates composed ofa mixture ofB cells
`and T cells in the trephine-biopsy specimens from
`patients with a response. Whether this finding rep-
`resents an immune response against the ineffective
`clone is unknown. Furthermore, lenalidomide sen-
`
`sitizes erythroid progenitors to the trophic effects of
`recombinant erythropoietin (unpublished data).
`The promising activity of lenalidomide in my-
`elodysplastic syndromes must be balanced against
`its potential to cause clinically significant myelo-
`suppression, which necessitates close laboratory
`monitoring during the initial weeks of treatment.
`Neutropenia or thrombocytopenia developed in
`more than half the patients and was not limited to
`patients with preexisting lineage deficits. The ex-
`tent of myelosuppression varied according to the
`dose and cumulative exposure to lenalidomide and
`was reversed by the interruption of treatment or a
`reduction in the dose. Although early exacerbation
`of cytopenias may be expected with an agent that
`selectively suppresses myelodysplastic clones that
`dominate steady-state hematopoiesis, many pa-
`tients did not have myelos uppression despite pro-
`longed lenalidomide treatment. A reduction in
`marrow cellularity coincided with myelosuppres-
`sion in patients treated with 25 mg daily, indicat-
`ing that lenalidomide suppresses myelopoiesis at
`higher doses. At lower doses, however, this effect
`was not apparent. Other adverse events were un-
`common and generally mild in severity. Hypothy-
`roidism or gonadal dysfimction developed in four
`patients, raising the possibility that the action ofle-
`nalidomide on ligand-induced responses may ex-
`tend to hypophyseal hormones.
`
`556
`
`N ENC-L] MED 352:6 WWW.NE]M.ORG FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`edd '5 La oraton‘es Inc v Cel ene Cor
`r
`The New England meal Of Media“
`Downloaded from nejmorg on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. £6 (filer ses wraiout permissroh. lPR2%18-0150%
`Copyright © 2005 Massach

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket