throbber

`
`
`
`The
`L13cw Englanu
`Journal of Medicine
`
`
`
`Established in 1812 as THE New ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY
`
`VOLUME 341
`
`NOVEMBER 18, I999
`
`NUMBER 21
`
`ORIGINAL ARTICLES
`
`light-To-Moderate Alcohol Consumption
`and the Risk of Stroke among
`US. Male Physicians
`1L BERGER AND OTHERS
`
`. EDITORIAL:
`\,
`Alcohol for Stroke Prevention? .............................. I60?"
`M. HOMMEL AND A. IAILLARD
`-
`
`1557 K .J
`
`Thalidomide -— A Revival Story ......................
`N. RAH: AND K. ANDERSON
`
`Antitumor Activity of Thalidomide
`
`in Refractory Multiple Myeloma .....................@
`
`S. SINGHAL AND OTHERS
`
`/
`Reduction of False Negative Results in
`Screening of Newborns for Homocysu'nuria I572
`MJ. Pernnscumrr, LR. SIMMONS,
`AND H.L. LEVY
`
`Brief Report: Leuprolide Acetate Therapy
`in Luteinizing Hormone-Dependent
`Cushing’s Syndrome .............................................. 1577
`A. LACROIX, P. HAMET, AND ].-M. BOUTIN
`
`IMAGIS IN CLINICAL MEDICINI
`
`Gangrene and Type I Cryoglobulinemia
`in Multiple Myeloma ............................................. I582.
`L. CIRASINO AND LR. BARBANO
`
`SPECIAL ARTICLE
`
`Mortality among Recent Purchasers
`of Handguns ...........................................................
`GJ. WINTEMUTE, C.A. PARIIAM,
`1.]. BEAUMONT, M. WRIGHT, AND C. DRAKE
`
`REVIEW ARTICLE
`
`Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo ................. I590
`I.M. FURMAN AND S.P. CASS
`
`CASE RECORDS OF THE
`MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL
`
`Firearms and Suicide ................................................. 1609
`ML ROSENBERG, LA. MERCY,
`AND LB. POTTER
`
`SOUNDING BOARD
`
`Medical Professionalism in Society ...................... 1612
`M.K. WYNIA, S.R. LA'I'HAM, A.C. KAO,
`LW. BERG, AND L.L. EMANUEL
`
`INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS ......................... 1617
`
`CORRISPON DENCE
`
`Authors’ Conflicts of Interest: A Disclosure
`
`and Editors’ Reply ..................................................... I618
`Reimbursement for Evaluation
`
`and Management Services ........................................ Iéuf"
`Neostigmine for Acute Colonic Pseudo~0bstruction 1612
`DNA Vaccines ................................................................. 1623
`The Effects of Vancomyein and B-Lactam
`Antibiotics on Vancomydn’Resistant
`Staphylococcus aurm .................................................. 162.4
`Priming with Human Char-ionic Gonadotropin
`before Retrieval of Immature Oocytes
`in Women with Infertility Due to the
`Polyeystie Ovary Syndrome ...................................... I624
`
`BOOK REVIEWS ....................................................... 1627
`
`NOTICES ..................................................................... 1629
`CORRECTIONS
`A Five-Month-Old Girl
`Treatment of Asthma with Drugs Modifying
`With Coffee-Grounds Vomitus ........................... I
`the Leukotriene Pathway ........................................ 1632
`S. HARDY AND S.B. KEEL
`Zolpidem in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
`I632
`
`Owned, gamut. ul Ocopyrubud, 1999, by TH: MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOCIETY
`
` mt‘bOI-‘UCHFH’U
`
`0024 & :4
`71 1.9 99
`a
`
`1m NEW ENGLAND IOURNAL or Mwlcm: (ISSN 0028-4793) iI published weekly
`from editorial office: i 10 Shamxk Street. Bonon, MA 02115-6094‘ Subscription price'
`$129.00 per yur. Periodical: W paid at Boston and at additional mailing offices
`POSTMASTER: Send address changes In ROI Box 540803, WIldIam, MA 02454-0803.
`
`DOES NOT
`
`LEA VE £13m;
`
`Dr. Reddy's Laboraton’os, Inc. v. Celgene Corp,
`IPR2018-01509
`Exhibit 2023, Page 1
`
`.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`ANTITUMOH ACTIVITY OF THALIDOMIDE IN REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA ur.v--¢‘ '3‘." ' ‘ i
`
`
`
`3" f»-
`..‘,‘.“.‘t
`'tt:
`.
`\
`
`
` .‘.'53.,» . ‘
`I
`..
`-‘ <;~ 'I‘."
`:‘T'fifiii
`" ' U" ‘7' Cir
`
`
`
`ANTITUMOR ACTIVITY OF THALIDOMIDE IN REFRACTORY
`MULTIPLE MYELOMA
`
`SEEMA SINGHAL, M.D., JAYESH MEHTA, M.D., RAMAN DesmAN, M.D., DAN AYERS, M.S., PAULA Roarnson, PH.D.,
`'
`PAUL EDDLEMON, B.S., NIKHIL MUNSHl, M.D., ELIAS ANAlSSlE. M.D., CARLA WILSON, M.D., PH.D.,
`MADHAV DHODAPKAR, M.D., JEROME ZELDIS, M.D., AND BART BARLOGIE, M.D., PHD.
`
`AesTnAcr
`
`Background Patients with myeloma who relapse
`after high-dose chemotherapy have few therapeutic
`options. Since increased bone marrow vascularity
`imparts a poor prognosis in myeloma, we evaluated
`the efficacy of thalidomide, which has antiangiogenic
`properties, in patients with refractory disease.
`Method: Eighty—four previously treated patients
`with refractory myeloma (76 with a relapse after high
`dose chemotherapy) received oral thalidomide as a
`single agent for a median of 80 days (range, 2 to 465).
`The starting dose was 200 mg daily, and the dose was
`increased by 200 mg every two weeks until it reached
`800 mg per day. Response was assessed on the ba-
`sis of a reduction of the myeloma protein in serum
`or Bence Jones protein in urine that lasted for at least
`six weeks.
`
`Results The serum or urine levels of paraprotein
`were reduced by at least 90 percent in eight patients
`(two had a complete remission), at least 75 percent
`in six patients, at least 50 percent in seven patients,
`and at least 25 percent in six patients, for a total rate
`of response of 32 percent. Reductions in the parapro-
`tein levels were apparent within two months in 78
`percent of the patients with a response and were as-
`sociated with decreased numbers of plasma cells in
`bone marrow and increased hemoglobin levels. The
`microvasculer density of bone marrow did not change
`significantly in patients with a response. At least one
`third of the patients had mild or moderate constipa-
`tion, weakness or fatigue, or somnolence. More se-
`vere adverse effects were infrequent (occurring in less
`than 10 percent of patients), and hematologic effects
`Were rare. As of the most recent follow-up, 36 pa-
`tients had died (30 with no response and 6 with a re-
`sponse). After 12 months of follow—up, Kaplen—Meier
`estimates of the mean (:SE) rates oi event-free sur-
`vival and overall survival for all patients were 2215
`percent and 58:5 percent, respectively.
`ad—
`Conclusion: Thalidomide is active against
`vanced myeloma, It can induce marked and durable
`responses in some patients with multiple myeloma,
`including those who relapse after high-dose chemo-
`therapy. (N Engl J Med 1999;341:1565-71.)
`01999, Massachusetts Medical Society.
`
`ULTIPLE myeloma accounts for ap-
`proximately 1 percent of all cancers and
`10 percent of hematologic cancers. It
`is incurable with conventional chemo—
`therapy.l Mclphalan-bascd high-dose chemotherapy
`with hcmatoPOictic stcm~ccll support incrcaScs the
`rate of complete remission and extends event-free and
`overall survival.H However, many patients still relapse,
`and options for salvage therapy are limited.5)6
`Angiogcncsis is important in cmbryogcnesis, wound
`healing, diabetic rctinopathy, and tumor progression."
`The immunomodulatory drug thalidomide can inhib-
`it angiogcncsis and induce apoptosis of established
`ncovasculaturc in experimental models.’-)0 For these
`reasons, angiogcncsis-inhibiting drugs such as tha-
`lidomide may be useful for treating cancers that dc-
`pcnd on ncovascularizau'on.
`Prominent bone marrow vascularization occurs in
`
`multiple myeloma. It correlates positively with a high
`plasma-cell—labeling index (a poor prognostic Sign)
`and disease activity and independently confers a poor
`prognosisll-l" Plasma levels of various angiogcnic cy-
`tokincs, such as basic fibroblast growth factor and
`vascular cndothclial growth factor, are elevated in pa-
`tients with active myelornafl'nv16 In 1965, Olson er al.
`reported slowing of disease progression in one pa-
`tient who was treated with thalidomide.17 Thcsc con—
`siderations led us to administer thalidomide to five
`
`patients with end-stage myeloma through a compas-
`sionate-use protocol. One patient with a large tumor
`burden (as indicated by an IgA level of 8.4 g per dec-
`iliter, the presence of more than 95 percent plasma
`cells in bone marrow, and the need for transfusion),
`who had had no response to two cycles of high-dose
`chemotherapy followed by multiple salvage therapies,
`had a nearly complete remission within three months
`after the initiation of thalidomide therapy. This ob-
`servation prompted a phase 2 investigation of tha-
`
`
`
`From the Myclom and Lymphoma Program, South Carolina Cancer
`Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia (5.5., }.M.); the Myeloma
`and Transplantation Research Center, University of Arkansas for Medical
`Sciences, Little Rock (R.D., D.A., Rik, BIL, N.M., E.A., C.W., 12., 8.3.);
`and the Labommory of Cellular Physiology and immunology, Rockefeller
`Univusiry, New York (MD). Addnm reprint requests to Dr. Barlogie II
`the Mycloma and Transplantation Research Center, University of Arkansas
`for Medical Sciences, i301 W. Markham, Slot 623. Little Rock, AR 72105.
`Other authors were David Siegel. M.D., Ph.D., University of Arkansas
`for Medical Sdenccs. Little Rock‘ and John Cch, Ph.D., Fred Hutch»
`inson Cancer Research Center, Seattle.
`
`Dr. Retir’fl‘éltnséflnei? chélbené car?“
`lPR2018-01509
`Exhibit 2023, Page 2
`
`

`

`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`lidomide in patients with advanced and refractory
`myeloma.
`
`TAILE 1. Cmcmmsnos or THE PATIENTS.
`
`Grammar:
`
`No. or
`Parents (95)
`
`METHODS
`
`Patients and'Ttootmonts
`
`Between December 1997 and June 1998, 84 consecutive, eligi-
`ble patients with previously treated and progressive myeloma began
`treatment with oral thalidomide as a single agent after providing
`written informed consent. No patients were excluded on the basis
`of renal or cardiopulmonary function, whereas patients could be
`excluded if the results of liver-function tests were more than twice
`the upper limit 0f normal levels. All patients were trmtod at a single
`center according to a phase 2 protocol approved by the institution-
`al review board and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
`Thalidomide was supplied in 50-mg capsules by Celgene (War-
`ren, NJ.) and was administered nightly at a dose of 200 mg. The
`‘dOsewasincreasedbyZOOmgeverymweeksforsixweeks.so
`that the final dose was 800 mg per day. Data were analyzed as of
`lune 17. 1999, when the duration of treatment ranged from 2 to
`465 days (median, 80) and the median fiollow-up of surviving
`patients was 13 months.
`Table 1_ summarizes the characteristics of the patients and de-
`tails ofprior therapy. Seventy-six patients (90 percent) had received
`at least one cydc of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hem-
`aropoietic stem-cell support, and 58 (69 percent) had received two
`or more cycles of intensive chemotherapy. The median time from
`the last course ,of high—dose chemotherapy to the beginning of
`treatment with thalidomide was 14 months. A high—risk cyto-
`genetic abnormality (deletion of chromosome 13) was present in
`35 patients (42 percent).20 One padent had received an allograft
`as a second intervention, with evidence of full donor—type chi-
`merisrn in normal lyrnphohematopoietie cells. At the time of en-
`rollment, all patients had progressive disease, with an increase in
`paraprorein levels of at least 25 percent or at least 50 percent plas—
`ma cells in bone marrow. Approximately halfthc patients had been
`retreated with dcxamethasone or other regimens, but the disease
`had progressed before thalidomide treatment was begun.
`
`Evaluation
`
`The pretreatment evaluation included complete blood counts,
`tests of renal and liver function, serum and urine protein electro-
`phoresis, and measurements of serum levels of immunoglobulins,
`beraz-microglohulin, and C-reactive protein Bone marrow aspi-
`rates were obtained and biopsies were performed to determine
`the percentage of plasma cells in bone marrow, to identify kary—
`otypic abnormalities (Giemsa-banded cells in metaphase), and to
`assess the proliferative activity in plasma cells according to die
`bromodeoxyuridine method to derive the plasma-cell—labeling
`index.13 Follow-up studies included a weekly estimation of para-
`protein levels — the myeloma protein in serum and Bence Jones
`protein in urine — for the first two months, followed thereafter
`by monthly measurements. Whenever possible, bone marrow was
`examined at the time of the maximal response or when patients
`with no response left the study.
`The microvascularity of bone marrow was studied in a semi-
`quantitative fashion in biopsy samples that were obtained with
`a trephinc and stained with an anti~CD34 monoclonal antibody
`(prediluned Clone QBEnd/ 10, Cell Marque, Austin, Tex.) The
`results were expressed as the number of vessels per high-power
`field (400X).
`
`Assessment of Response
`
`The primary end point of the study was the finding of a decline
`in the level ofparaprotcin in serum or urine of at least 25 percent,
`50 percent, 75 percent, or 90 percent on two occasions at least
`six weeks apart. Among patients with detectable levels of both
`urine and serum paraprotein, the response was judged on the ba-
`sis of the component showing the smaller decline. Patients with
`
`1556 - November 18, 1999
`
`61 (73)
`51 (6])
`51 (61)
`18 (21)
`76 (90)
`58 (69)
`43 (57)
`
`32 (38)
`19 (23)
`17 (20)
`22 (26)
`22 (26)
`24 (29)
`20 (24)
`5] (61)
`44 (52)
`18 (21)
`13 (15)
`19 (23)
`35 (42)
`
`"
`Male wt
`Dorie—Salmon stage III multiple myeloma
`IgG paraprotein
`Duration 13pr therapy >60 mo
`Prior high-dose chemotherapy
`Receipt of >1 cycle of high-dose chemotherapy
`Interval between last cycle offiigh-dosc chemotherapy
`and initiation of thalidomide >12 mo
`Age >60 yr
`Hemoglobin <9 g/dl
`Platelet count <50X lol/mm’
`Serum albumin <3.5 g/dl
`Serum creatinine >r.s mg/dl (133 patrol/liter)
`Serum beuz-rnlcroglobulin >6 mg/liter
`Serum C-rcaetive protein >3 mg/liter
`Serum monoclonal immunoglohulin >1 g/dl
`Urine Bence Iones protein >l g/day
`>5096 Plasma cells in bone marrow on biopsy
`Plasma-cefl‘labeling index >19t-
`Bartl grade 111
`Deletion of chromosome 13
`Outcome
`Completion of study
`Withdrawal from study
`Progression
`Intolerance of thalidomide
`Deathofpalientwitharesponset
`Personal masons
`Final dose of thalidomide
`72 (86)
`400 rug/day
`57 (68)
`600 trig/day
`
`800 mg/day 46 (55)
`
`_
`
`19 (23)
`
`54: (64)
`9 (11)
`1(1)
`l (1)
`
`‘The plmna-ccll—labeling index represents the percentage of light-chain—
`restricted plasma cells incorporating bromodeoxyuridlne.”
`(The Bartlgrsdiugsystemdisringuishesmyelomaedlsaccordingtotheir
`morphologic maturation." Grade I] refer: to immature plasma cells of
`cleaved, asynchronous, or polymorphous appearance.
`zmrpatimthadarespomemneaunembutdiedomhyvofueammu
`
`a reduction of less than 25 percent and those who discontinued
`treatment before a response could be assessed were considered to
`have had no response to thalidomide. Thus, the results were eval-
`uated on an intention-to-treat basis. In patients with a response,
`an increase in serum or urine paraprotein levels by more than 25
`percent above the nadir value was considered evidence of relapse.
`In patients who had a complete remission, evidence of reemer-
`gence of the monoclonal protein (detemiined by immunofixation)
`on at least two occasions was considered to indimte a relapse. In
`patients who had a complete remission or a nearly complete re—
`mission (k90 percent reduceion in serum or urine paraprotein lev-
`els), a bone marrow response was defined as the finding of less
`than 5 percent plasma cells in the biopsy specimen or aspirate. For
`the remaining patients with a paraprotein response, the percent-
`age of plasma cells had to decrease by at least 50 percent to qual-
`ify as a bone marrow response.
`
`Assessment of Adverse Elfom
`
`All patients, irrespective of the duration of therapy, were in-
`cluded in the evaluation of adverse effects. All patients received
`diaries after providing informed consent, and 83 patients (99 per-
`
`Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. v. Oelgene Corp.
`IPR2018-01509
`Exhibit 2023, Page 3
`
`cen
`
`W1
`
`povvsflc.éflfi'993fil
`..-—~—.unm~.nunfih<3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`IPR2018-01509
`Exhibit 2023, Page 4
`
`

`

`
`The New England Journal owedicine
`
`_——
`__________—__—__—.——u—-———————-
`
`TABLE 2. Pamnon-zm Pompous: AND BONE MARROW murmur:
`____________.__———.—_-——————-—
`
`PW Rem
`
`No. or
`PATENTS
`(96 or mml
`
`Worm
`Mm Rem:
`TOTAL
`NO. WITH
`N0.‘
`REPONSE(%)1
`
`MM Sum-
`NO. WITH
`NO. WHO
`lawsuit) man“)
`
`o
`o
`2 (100)
`2
`2 (2)
`Complete remission
`2
`2
`5 (33)
`a
`6 (7)
`)90% decrease in paraprotein
`1
`3
`3 (so)
`5
`6 (7)
`375% decrease in panprotein
`7 (8)
`350% decrease in parapmtein
`o
`3.
`4 (100)
`4
`3
`4
`3 (75)
`4
`6 (7)
`325% decrease in paraprotein
`6 (22)
`12 (44)
`17 (81)
`21
`27 (32)
`Total
`
`
`
`—4 (15)27 30 (53)
`57 (68)
`No response
`
`"l‘he response could not be evaluated in 6 of the patients with a paraprotein response and in 30
`of the patients with no paraprotein response.
`1A bone marrow retponse was defined as the presence of 13: than 5 percent plasma cells in bone
`marrow in patients who had a complete pmpmtein response or at least a 90 percent reduction in
`paraprotein levels anda: a reduction in plasma cells of at last 50 percent in patients with all other
`rypm of paraprotein responses.
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.3
`
`
`
`
`
`'-CumulativeIncidence
`
`1'
`
`
`
`>25% reduction in paraprotein
`..............
`:................... >5°% reduction In par.pro‘°in
`
`
`r", ..... -.r'-'
` :4"
`___..r---
`------ Complete response
`
`10
`12
`14
`16
`O
`2
`4
`6
`8
`
`"J...............n.....
`
`....'------------- >75% reduction in paraprotein
`
`------- 390% reduction in paraprotein
`
`Months after the Start of Thalidomide
`
`Figure 1. Times to Various Paraproteln Responses.
`Among patients with a response, the median times to a reduction In the serum or urine paraproteln
`level of at least 25 percent, 50 percent, 75 percent, and 90 percent were one, two, four, and four
`months. respectively. Seventy-eight percent of the responses at the lowest level (3:26 percent reduc-
`tlon) were apparent within two months after the lnltiation of treatment.
`
`Microvmulnr Density of Bone Marrow
`
`The microvascular density of bone marrow was
`scheduled to be assessed every 50 days for a total of
`seven measurements, including the pretreatment val—
`ue. At least one measurement of the microvascular
`
`density of bone marrow was made in 74 patients (88
`percent); two or more measurements were made in
`37 patients (44 percent). In all, measurements were
`made in 69 patients before treatment and (in 50-
`day increments) in 17 at time 2, in 22 at time 3, in
`11 at time 4, in 12 at time 5, in 4 at time 6, and in
`3 at time 7. The microvascular density of bone mar-
`row and the percentage of plasma cells in bone mar-
`row correlated significantly at all times except the last
`(r>0.5, PS0.01). Although the microvascular den-
`sity of bone marrow decreased markedly in some pa-
`
`tients with a complete or nearly complete remissiOn,
`estimates of the lepe were not significantly different
`from zero among those with a response (P=0.39)
`and those without a response (P=0.22).
`
`Other Changes
`
`The percent changes from base line to the time of
`the maximal response among patients with a response
`and the time of the last follow-up visit among those
`without a response were assessed for betaz-micro-
`globulin, C-reactivc protein, lactic dehydrogenase,
`creatinine, albumin, and hemoglobin levels and the
`platelet count. Hemoglobin levels increased only in
`patients with a response (median increase, 11 percent;
`P<0.001 for the comparison with base-line values).
`Serum levels of betaz-microglobulin rose (median in-
`
`1568 . Novembcrls, 1999
`
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`IPR2018—01509
`Exhibit 2023, Page 5
`
`car
`
`lev
`res
`cei
`
`nnmmmauaz’
`
`m-l
`
`.-‘-——‘——.
`
`
`
`._.______.__.._.._.—-————._.—.—————-———
`
`

`

`
`
`ANTITUMOR ACTIVITY OF THALIDOMIDE IN REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA
`
`crease, 43 percent; P<0.001) and serum albumin lev-
`els fell (median decrease, 4 percent; P<0.001) signifi-
`cantly in patients with no response. Serum creatinine
`levels did not change significantly in patients with a W Em
`response, and they increased by a median of 13 per-
`cent in those without a response (P<0.001),
`
`TABLE 3. INCIDENCE 0F GRADE 1 on 2 ADVERSE Emacrs.‘
`
`DulcFTW
`_ zoo mg/DM 400mg/DAY 600mg/DAY 800mg/DAY
`(“33)
`("‘72)
`("'57)
`("““l
`percentage 0' patient"
`44
`44
`31
`39
`
`59
`48
`
`35
`29
`
`‘
`
`34
`12
`17
`16
`16
`
`16
`10
`6
`12
`12
`
`43
`14
`25
`,8
`24
`
`17
`13
`1°
`15
`10
`
`40
`19
`23
`21
`23
`
`14
`19
`12
`23
`14
`
`43
`23
`as
`' as
`22
`
`22
`22
`22
`11
`11
`
`Constipation
`Mum Effects
`Side effects reported by at least 10 percent of pa- Wan“, o,
`tients at most dose levels are listed in Table 3. Most
`fads»:
`adverse effects were mild or moderate (grade 1 or
`Sonmfficncc
`2 according to the system of classification of the Twat;
`World Health Organization). Constipation, weakness Dim“
`or fatigue, and somnolence occurred in one third or
`Rash
`more of the patients. Reports of grade 3 or 4 adverse M Chang“
`effects were infrequent (less than 10 percent in all
`«depression
`cases). One quarter of the patients had no appreciable
`Mordimfion
`side effects at the ZOO-mg dose, whereas virtually all mm“
`patients had adverse effects of grade 1 or 2 at higher
`Edam
`doses. Fewer than 5 percent of patients had grade 1 or
`NM“
`Headache
`2 leukopenia at any dose, and grade 3 or 4 thrombo-
`cytopenia or anemia occurred in only three patients.
`In most of the patients who had no response, pre-
`treatment anemia or thrombocytopcnia did nor wor-
`sen, Whereas significant increases in the hemoglobin
`levels occurred in patients with a response. Nine pa-
`tients could not tolerate thalidomide (four with a re-
`sponse and five with no response) and discontinued
`treatment after a median of 36 days (range, 10 to
`241). In eight patients, an increase in serum creati-
`nine levels of more than 50 percent was related to
`progressive disease, with increasing Bence Jones pro-
`teinuria. One of the patients with a response died
`suddenly on day 37 of treatment. The death was
`thought to be related to sepsis, although a possible
`contribution of thalidomide could not be ruled out.
`
`'The classification system of the World Health Organization was used.
`Gnde 1 effects are mild, and grade 2 are moderate.
`1’Values are the percentages of patients at each dose level.
`
`were all predictive of a brief period of event-free sur—
`vival, whereas low albumin levels (P<0.001), the de-
`letion of chromosome 13 (P=0.004), and high num-
`bers of plasma cells in bone marrow (P=0.05) were
`associated with a relatively short overall survival.
`Thalidomide was discontinued after a median of
`
`52 days (range, 2 to 286) because of a lack of response
`in 53 patients (4 patients continued to receive the
`drug without a response) and because of relapse in
`12 patients who had had a response. One patient who
`had a decrease in the paraprotein level of at least 25
`percent and who had not previously received high-
`dose therapy subsequently underwent autologous
`stem-cell transplantation at his owu request. As of
`June 17, 1999, 36 patients had died, including 30 pa-
`tients without a response who died of progressive
`disease or complications of Subsequent salvage ther—
`apy, as well as 6 patients with a response who subse-
`quently relapsed and died of progressive disease (3) or
`toxicity from salvage therapy (3).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`We found that thalidomide had substantial antitu-
`mor activity in patients with advanced myeloma. Ten
`percent of patients had complete or nearly complete
`remission, and 32 percent had a reduction in serum
`or urine paraprotein levels of at least 25 percent. In
`most patients, the decline in paraprotein levels was
`accompanied by a reduction in the percentage of plas-
`ma cells in bone marrow and an increase in hemo-
`
`globin levels, both of which are consistent with the
`
`1569
`Volume 341 Number 21
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`IPR2018-01509
`Exhibit 2023, Page 6
`
`Time to Progression, Event-free Survival,
`and Overall Survival
`
`0f the 27 patients with a decrease in paraprotein
`levels of at least 25 percent, 12 had a recurrence of
`the disease. After a median follow-up of 14.5 months
`(range, 12 to 16), the median time to progression
`had not been reached. The disease in a mean (:SE)
`of 4-4: 10 percent of patients was judged to have pro-
`gressed at 12 months. The median event-free survival
`for all 84 patients was three months (Fig. 2). After 12
`months of follow-up, 22:5 percent of the 84 patients
`remained event-free and 581-5 percent Were alive.
`Nineteen patients were still receiving thalidomide 4 to
`15 months after starting the treatment (median, 13),
`including 15 patients with a response and 4 with no
`response who had had some improvement in various
`disease indicators but who had not had a decrease in
`
`paraprotein levels of at least 25 percent. Multivariate
`analysis indicated that increases in lactic dehydrogen-
`ase levels (P=0.001), the plasma—cell—labeling index
`(P=0.006), and C-reactive protein levels (P=0.007)
`
`
`
`

`

`dr(
`ucr
`865
`1
`tip
`re;
`stu
`l‘ul
`> pa.
`cm
`Ch-
`tip
`
`5
`(g
`I
`Sin
`__
`
`.3!
`riptea
`Mt
`W
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-c:eta-Zen":asewe=29:seer-295393.:93'33‘3"2"
`
`The New England Journal of MedicineW
`
`1.0
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`2
`(1:)
`33
`.2".
`
`0 C
`
`0.4
`
`.12:
`a
`e 0.2
`0.
`
`0.0
`
`
`
`
`Overall survival
`
`Eventvjree survival
`-----------------
`
`0
`
`2
`
`14.
`12
`10
`8
`4
`Months after the Start of Thalidomide
`
`16
`
`18
`
`No. Ar Rust
`84
`Overall survival
`Event-free survival 84
`
`78
`65
`
`as
`39
`
`58
`24
`
`55
`19
`
`51
`18
`
`34
`11
`
`Figure 2. Kaplan-Msier Estimates of Overall Survival and Event—free Survival.
`Event-free survival was calculated from the start of thalidomide therapy to progression. removal from
`. the study for any reason, death from any cause, or the last follow-up visit, whichever occurred first 1 bars
`indicate standard errors at 12 months.
`
`presence of atrue antitumor efi‘ect. Although not ex-
`amined quantitatively, bone pain decreased markedly
`in patients with a response. We did not evaluate lyric
`bone lesions, which seldom heal,even in patients with
`a sustained complete remission.
`Thalidomide has a number of properties that could
`explain its activity in myeloma; it can alter the expres~
`sion of adhesion molecules}5 suppress the production
`of tumor necrosis factor a,” increase the production
`of interleukin-10,37 'and enhance cell—mediated im-
`munity by directly sfimuladng cytotoxic T cells.” Its
`interactions with type 1 and type 2 helper T cells pro-
`duce complex effects on the levels of cytokines such as
`interleukin-4, interleukin-5, and interferon-y.” Tha~
`lidomide also increases the total number of lympho~
`cytes as well as CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell counts, along
`with substantially increasing mean plasma levels of
`soluble interleukin—2 receptor.29
`Thalidomide has been shown to inhibit angiogenv
`esis induced by fibroblast growth factor and vascular
`endothelial growth factor in a rabbit-cornea micro-
`pocket assay9 and a murine model of corneal vascu-
`larization.lo It has also been shown to cause apoptosis
`of established mum-associated angiogenesis in expero
`imemal models.10 The bone marrow of patients with
`hematologic cancers shows extensive vascularityflzv13
`which has prognostic implications in myeloma.“ The
`apparent lack of a consistent decrease in the microvas-
`cular density of bone marrow in patients in whom
`thalidomide had a marked antitumor effect requires
`further study. The persistence of extensive vascular-
`ization in some patients with a response is consistent
`with the finding of persistent neovascularity in pa-
`tients with multiple myeloma who had a response to
`high-dose chemotherapy.15 The production of an-
`
`1570 - November 18,1999
`
`giogenic cytokincs such as fibroblast growth factor
`and vascular endothelial growth factor by undetect-
`able residual myeloma cells may sustain the increased
`microvascular density of bone marrow in patients con-
`sidered to be in remission on the basis of bone mar-
`
`row findings. The persistence of extensive vasculariza-
`tion in patients with a response makes it seem likely
`that the antimyeloma action of thalidomide depends
`on more than one of the actions of the drug out-
`lined above. The mouse model of severe combined
`
`immunodeficiency, which can be used for the in vivo
`growth of primary human myeloma cells, is ideally
`suited to study the mechanisms by which thalidomide
`induces responses in myeloma.‘o
`The antitumor properties of thalidomide are being
`evaluated in various malignant diseases,“as although
`only limited efficacy data are available so far. Pro-
`longed responses to thalidomide in some patients with
`advanced refractory disease suggest that the mecha-
`nism of action of thalidomide is distinctly different
`from that of the other agents active against mycloma.
`The absence of myelosuppressive and other impor-
`tant adverse effects suggests that thalidomide could
`be an ideal agent for use in combination with che-
`motherapy. Indeed, a complete remission has been
`achieved with such an approach. in several patients
`with myeloma who had no response to treatment with
`either regimen alone.“ This approach has also been
`shown to have greater antitumor activity than chemo-
`therapy alone in a murine model of breast cancer.”
`In our study, most patients had adverse effects,
`but the majority of these reactions were mild or mod-
`erate. Reducing the dose of thalidomide alleviated the
`effects in most cases, and only nine patients discon-
`tinued therapy altogether. The gradual reduction in
`
`Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`IPR2018—01509
`Exhibit 2023, Page 7
`
`

`

`ANTITUMOR ACTIVITY OF THALIDOMIDE IN REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA
`
`drowsiness and fatigue insome patients with contin-
`ued treatment at the same dose (data not showu) sug~
`gests the occurrence of tachyphylaxis.
`We conclude that thalidomide is active against mul-
`tiple mycloma, even in patients who relapsed after
`repeated cycles of high--dose chemotherapy Larger
`studies of thalidomide, its analogues, and otherin-
`hibitors of angiogenesis are therefore warranted in
`patients with myeloma an

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket