throbber
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS
`
`Thalidomide produces transfusion independence in long-standing refractory
`anemias of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
`Azra Raza, Peter Meyer, Diya Dutt, Francesca Zorat, Laurie Lisak, Fabiana Nascimben, Morne du Randt, Christopher Kaspar,
`Cathryn Goldberg, Jerome Loew, Saleem Dar, Sefer Gezer, Parameswaran Venugopal, and Jerome Zeldis
`
`Thalidomide was administered to 83 pa-
`tients with myelodysplastic syndrome
`(MDS), starting at 100 mg by mouth daily
`and increasing to 400 mg as tolerated. Thirty-
`two patients stopped therapy before 12
`weeks (minimum period for response evalu-
`ation), and 51 completed 12 weeks of
`therapy.
`International Working Group re-
`sponse criteria for MDS were used to evalu-
`ate responses. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis
`classified all off-study patients as nonre-
`sponders. Off-study patients belonged to a
`higher risk category (P5 .002) and had a
`Introduction
`
`higher percentage of blasts in their pre-
`therapy bone marrow than patients who
`completed 12 weeks of therapy (P5 .003).
`No cytogenetic or complete responses were
`seen, but 16 patients showed hematologic
`improvement, with 10 previously transfu-
`sion-dependent patients becoming transfu-
`sion independent. Responders had lower
`pretherapy blasts (P5 .016), a lower dura-
`tion of pretherapy platelet transfusions
`(P5 .013), and higher pretherapy platelets
`(P5 .003). Among responders, 9 had refrac-
`tory anemia (RA); 5 had RA with ringed
`
`sideroblasts; and 2 had RA with excess
`blasts. By ITT analysis, 19% of patients (16
`of 83) responded, and when only evaluable
`patients were analyzed, 31% (16 of 51) re-
`sponded. It was concluded that thalidomide,
`as a single agent, is effective in improving
`cytopenias of some MDS patients, espe-
`cially those who present without excess
`blasts. (Blood. 2001;98:958-965)
`
`© 2001 by The American Society of Hematology
`
`Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) have few therapeutic options that
`are even palliative, and none that are curative,1 especially if the affected
`patients are not suitable candidates for hematopoietic stem cell transplan-
`tation.2-4 Despite intense interest in growth factors,5-12 differentiating
`agents,13-15 and cytotoxic drugs,16-19 supportive care continues to be the
`standard therapy for the majority of patients. The clinical and biological
`heterogeneity of MDS suggests the possibility of multiple therapeutic
`targets, especially in light of the recent novel insights into the pathogen-
`esis of cytopenias. It appears that large numbers of hematopoietic cells
`are not only rapidly proliferating in the bone marrow, but also
`simultaneously undergoing programmed cell death.20-28 Furthermore,
`apoptosis in the hematopoietic cells is mediated by cytokines, such as
`tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a), transforming growth factor beta,
`interleukin 1 beta (IL-1b), and IL-6.29-33 Attempts to suppress this
`excessive cytokine-mediated apoptosis in MDS with cytoprotective34
`and/or anticytokine therapies35-37 have resulted in substantial improve-
`ments in the cytopenias of some MDS patients.
`The bone marrows of MDS patients also demonstrate markedly
`increased neo-angiogenesis and higher-than-normal levels of vascular
`endothelial growth factor.38,39 Finally, in addition to the frequent
`involvement of B-cells in the MDS process itself,40 a more intrinsic
`immune defect may also exist in these patients.41 T-cell lymphopenia,
`especially that affecting the CD41 cells, has been described,42 and
`suppression of T-cell function by means of antithymocyte globulin
`(ATG) and cyclosporin is associated with improvement in the cytope-
`
`nias.43,44 Thalidomide was considered a potentially useful drug for MDS
`patients. It is an immune-modulatory agent with anticytokine activi-
`ties45-51 and has antiangiogenic effects.52-54 Thalidomide has meaningful
`activity in multiple myeloma,55 even though the precise mechanism of
`its action remains unclear. On the basis of this rationale, a pilot study was
`conducted to test the efficacy of thalidomide in improving the ineffec-
`tive hematopoiesis seen in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
`The results of this pilot study are encouraging enough to warrant larger
`prospective trials in the future.
`
`Patients, materials, and methods
`
`All patients, after signing an informed consent form approved by the
`Institutional Review Board of Rush-Presbyterian–St Luke’s Medical Cen-
`ter, Chicago, IL, participated in the study, MDS 98-21, titled “A pilot study
`of thalidomide (thalidomide) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.”
`Every patient had a pretherapy bone marrow aspirate and biopsy examina-
`tion performed at the Rush Cancer Institute (RCI). All samples were
`reviewed at the central facility by a hematopathologist at RCI/Rush-
`Presbyterian–St Luke’s Medical Center to confirm the diagnosis of MDS.
`Each patient started by taking 100 mg thalidomide by mouth at bedtime and
`increased the dose as tolerated to 400 mg by mouth at bedtime over the next
`several weeks. The drug was provided free of charge for the patients by
`Celgene (Warren, NJ). In the present study, no premenopausal woman of
`childbearing age was included. Newly diagnosed, as well as previously
`
`From the Rush Cancer Institute, Rush-Presbyterian–St Luke’s Medical Center,
`Chicago, IL, and the Celgene Corporation, Warren, NJ.
`
`financial interest in the Celgene Corporation, and A.R. is a member of the
`Speakers Bureau for the Celgene Corporation.
`
`Submitted March 17, 2000; accepted April 11, 2001.
`
`Supported by a National Cancer Institute grant (PO1 CA75606), The Roy Ringo
`Grant for Research in MDS, and a grant from The Woman’s Board TIME
`Center.
`
`J.Z. is an employee of the Celgene Corporation, which supplied thalidomide
`free of charge to the patients in this study. A.R. and P.V. have declared a
`
`Reprints: Azra Raza, Professor of Medicine, Director, Pre-Leukemia and
`Leukemia Program, Rush-Presbyterian–St Luke’s Medical Center, 2242 West
`Harrison St, Suite 108, Chicago, IL 60612-3515; e-mail: araza@rush.edu.
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby
`marked ‘‘advertisement’’ in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
`
`© 2001 by The American Society of Hematology
`
`958
`
`BLOOD, 15 AUGUST 2001 z VOLUME 98, NUMBER 4
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1023 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`BLOOD, 15 AUGUST 2001 z VOLUME 98, NUMBER 4
`
`THALIDOMIDE CAUSES TRANSFUSION INDEPENDENCE IN MDS
`
`959
`
`diagnosed, patients were eligible as were patients with both primary de
`novo and secondary MDS cases. Patients belonging to all subtypes of MDS
`as per the French-American-British (FAB) classification56 and to all risk
`categories according to the International Prognostic Scoring System
`(IPSS)57 were eligible. Patients were required not to have received any
`therapy for MDS for at least 4 weeks prior to starting thalidomide except for
`supportive care with transfusions. No other treatment for the primary
`disease such as growth factors could be administered to study patients while
`they were on thalidomide. Pyridoxine at 100 mg by mouth daily was
`prescribed for every patient as prophylaxis against peripheral neuropathy.
`Weekly complete blood counts (CBCs) with differentials were obtained,
`and upon completion of 12 weeks of therapy, the patients returned to RCI
`for a response evaluation, at which time all the pretherapy studies were
`repeated. In case of any evidence of a partial or complete response or stable
`disease as judged by the principal investigator, thalidomide was continued
`at the maximum tolerated dose for up to 1 year. Therapy was stopped in
`nonresponding patients at this time and they were taken off the study.
`The clinical end point of the study was to determine the efficacy of
`thalidomide in those patients who were able to complete at least 12 weeks
`of therapy at the maximally tolerated dose.
`
`Response criteria
`
`Response criteria outlined in the report of an International Working Group
`(IWG) to standardize response criteria for MDS58 were applied by an
`independent team (Global Therapeutic Development, Seattle, WA) to assess
`responses. Minor modifications had to be made to these criteria because this
`analysis was retrospective. The subsections below on “Pretherapy assess-
`ments” and “Assessments during therapy” describe modified criteria.
`Complete remission (CR). Bone marrow evaluation: CR is defined as
`repeat bone marrow evaluation showing fewer than 5% myeloblasts with
`normal maturation of all cell lines and no evidence for dysplasia. When
`erythroid precursors constitute fewer than 50% of bone marrow nucleated
`cells, the percentage of blasts is based on all nucleated cells; when there are
`50% or more erythroid cells, the percentage of blasts should be based on the
`nonerythroid cells.
`Peripheral blood evaluation. (Absolute values must last at least 2
`months.) (1) hemoglobin levels greater than 11 g/dL (untransfused patient
`not on erythropoietin); (2) neutrophil levels of 100/mL or higher (for patients not
`on a myeloid growth factor); (3) platelet levels of 100 000/mL or higher (for
`patients not on a thrombopoietic agent); (4) 0% blasts; (5) no dysplasia.
`Partial remission (PR) criteria. (Absolute values must last at least 2
`months.) PR is defined as a patient’s meeting all the CR criteria (if abnormal
`before treatment) except for bone marrow evaluation. The bone marrow
`criteria for PR are either that blasts decrease by at
`least 50% from
`pretreatment levels or that the MDS FAB classification be a less advanced
`category than at pretreatment. Cellularity or morphology is not relevant.
`Other criteria. (1) Stable disease is defined as failure to achieve at least
`a PR, but with no evidence of progression for at least 2 months. (2) Failure
`is defined as death during treatment or as disease progression characterized
`by worsening of cytopenias, increase in the percentage of BM blasts, or
`progression to an MDS FAB subtype more advanced than at pretreatment.
`(3) Disease transformation is defined as transformation to acute myelog-
`enous leukemia (AML), with at least 5% blasts. (4) A cytogenetic response
`requires 20 analyzable metaphases by conventional cytogenetic techniques.
`(5) A major cytogenetic response is defined as no detectable cytogenetic
`abnormality if pre-existing abnormality was present. (6) A minor cytoge-
`netic response is defined as 50% or more reduction in abnormal metaphases.
`Pretherapy assessments. (These incorporate minor modifications from
`the IWG response criteria.) For all patients, the baseline CBC to which
`improvements were compared was standardized with the use of a mean
`value for the 4 weeks prior to the start of therapy.
`Assessments during therapy. (These incorporate minor modifications
`from the IWG response criteria.) Responses were assessed at 12, 16, and 20
`weeks of therapy. Absolute values closest
`to the 12- and 16-week
`assessments were used, and responses had to be sustained for at least the
`subsequent 8 weeks. With regard to packed red blood cell transfusions
`(PRBCs) and transfusion independence, the same 4-week time period prior
`to treatment was used to determine transfusion dependence and to obtain a
`
`baseline monthly requirement. Subsequent transfusions were reviewed at
`12, 16, 20, 24, and 28 weeks. Patients who received a transfusion from day
`0 to week 12 were not considered transfusion independent; however, a
`patient who did not receive any transfusion at week 16 and sustained that
`independence for another 8 weeks was then considered transfusion
`independent. Patients were called late responders if they showed hemato-
`logic improvement (HI) after 20 weeks of therapy.
`Hematologic improvement. All improvements must last at least 8
`weeks. For a designated response (CR, PR, HI), all relevant response
`criteria must be noted on at least 2 successive determinations at least 1 week
`apart after an appropriate period following therapy.
`Erythroid response (HI-E). (1) Major response is defined as an increase in
`hemoglobin (Hb) greater than 2 g/dL for patients with pretreatment Hb below 11
`g/dL, and as transfusion independence for transfusion-dependent patients. (2)
`Minor response is defined as an increase of 1 to 2 g/dL in Hb for patients with
`pretreatment Hb less than 11 g/dL, and as a 50% decrease in PRBC requirements
`for transfusion-dependent patients.
`Platelet response (HI-P). (1) Major response is defined as an absolute
`increase of 30 000/mL or higher for patients with a pretreatment platelet
`count lower than 100 000/mL, and as stabilization of platelet counts and
`platelet transfusion independence for platelet transfusion–dependent pa-
`tients. (2) Minor response is defined as a 50% or greater increase in platelet
`count with a net increase greater than 10 000/mL, but less than 30 000/mL,
`for patients with a pretreatment platelet count less than 100 000/mL.
`Absolute neutrophil response (HI-ANC). (1) Major response is de-
`fined as at least a 100% increase or an absolute increase of 500/mL,
`whichever is greater, for patients with an ANC (absolute neutrophil count)
`lower than 1500/mL before therapy. (2) Minor response is defined as an
`ANC increase of at least 100% but an absolute increase less than 500/mL for
`an ANC that was lower than 1500/mL before therapy.
`
`Cytogenetic studies
`
`Standard karyotypic analysis by means of GTG banding was performed on
`every patient before therapy was started and each time a marrow was
`performed thereafter.
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`Distributions of numerical values were described as means and standard
`deviations or as medians and percentiles as appropriate. Comparisons of
`numerical values over time or across groups were made by means of
`Wilcoxon signed rank or paired tests as appropriate. Categorical variables
`were summarized with the use of percentages, and comparisons were
`performed by means of continuity-corrected chi-square tests or Fisher exact
`tests as appropriate. All tests were 2-sided, and P values of less than 5%
`were considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed by
`means of SPSS for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL) 10.0 and Splus 2000
`(Insightful, Seattle, WA).
`
`Results
`
`There were 83 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of myelodysplas-
`tic syndromes registered on this protocol. Thirty-two patients
`discontinued the protocol before completing 12 weeks of therapy;
`51 completed 12 weeks. We will present 2 separate sets of analysis:
`(1) an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of all 83 patients who either
`completed the 12 weeks on the study (51 patients) or prematurely
`discontinued therapy for various reasons (32 patients) and (2) an
`efficacy-analyzable analysis including only those subjects who
`completed the required minimum of 12 weeks on therapy.
`
`Baseline descriptive values
`
`The median age of the 83 patients was 67 years (Table 1). There were 55
`males and 28 females; 77 had primary de novo MDS, whereas 6 had
`secondary MDS. Thirty-six patients had refractory anemia (RA); 13 had
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1023 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`960
`
`RAZA et al
`
`BLOOD, 15 AUGUST 2001 z VOLUME 98, NUMBER 4
`
`Table 1. Baseline descriptive values for all subjects in study
`
`Total no. patients enrolled in MDS 98-21
`On study
`Off study
`Median age of patients, y
`Sex
`Male
`Female
`FAB
`RA
`RAEB
`RAEB-t
`RARS
`CMMoL
`MDS duration, d
`Median
`Range
`Transfusion history
`PRBC dependent
`Yes
`No
`Platelet dependent
`Yes
`No
`Primary/secondary MDS
`Primary
`Secondary
`IPSS
`Low
`INT-1
`INT-2
`High
`Biopsy cellularity
`Hyper
`Normal
`Hypo
`Thalidomide dose by duration, wk
`400 mg for at least 8 weeks
`400 mg for less than 8 weeks
`200 mg to 350 mg
`Less than 200 mg
`
`51
`32
`67
`
`55
`28
`
`36
`24
`6
`13
`4
`
`426
`9-3351
`
`63
`20
`
`21
`62
`
`77
`6
`
`21
`37
`12
`13
`
`54
`14
`12
`
`8
`36
`28
`10
`
`MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; FAB, French-American-British classification;
`RA, refractory anemia; RAEB, RA with excess blasts; RAEB-t, RAEB in transforma-
`tion; RARS, RA with ringed sideroblasts; CMMoL, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia;
`PRBC, packed red blood cell
`transfusion; platelet, platelet
`transfusion;
`IPSS,
`International Prognostic Scoring System; low, low-risk group; INT-1, intermediate-I
`risk group; INT-2, intermediate-II risk group; high, high-risk group.
`
`RA with ringed sideroblasts (RARS); 24 had RA with excess blasts
`(RAEB); 6 had RAEB in transformation (RAEB-t); and 4 had chronic
`myelomonocytic leukemia (CMMoL). These patients were also charac-
`terized into prognostic categories by means of the IPSS.57 Briefly, 21
`patients belonged to low-risk, 37 to intermediate-1 (INT-1), 12 to INT-2,
`and 13 to the high-risk category. Biopsy cellularity was available in 80
`cases; of these, 54 were hypercellular, 14 normocellular, and 12
`hypocellular. The median duration of MDS for the group was 426 days
`(range, 9-3351 days). Sixty-three patients were PRBC dependent, and
`21 were dependent on platelet transfusions at the time treatment started.
`
`whereas only 8 of 51 patients who continued had a high or INT-2
`IPSS score (P 5 .002). Second, off-study patients had a higher
`percentage of blasts in their pretherapy bone marrow (7% versus
`2%, P 5 .003). It appears therefore that patients with more
`advanced disease had decreased tolerance for the side effects of
`thalidomide or were taken off thalidomide owing to disease
`progression as described in the following section.
`
`Drug tolerance and toxicity
`
`Of the 83 patients entered in the study, 32 could not complete the 12
`weeks of therapy. Among these 32, the median duration of therapy
`was 4 weeks (range, 0-8 weeks). One patient never started the drug;
`6 were discontinued for disease progression; 11 discontinued the
`study for other medical problems (fever, bleeding, Sweet syn-
`drome, worsening of renal amyloidosis, spinal chloroma, gum
`hyperplasia, transfusion reaction); and 14 discontinued the treat-
`ment because of side effects from the drug. The most common side
`effects were fatigue (79%), constipation (71%), shortness of breath
`(54%), fluid retention (48%), dizziness (40%), rash (31%), numb-
`ness and tingling in fingers and/or toes (29%), fever and headache
`(27% each), and nausea (25%). Fewer than 5% of patients had
`grade IV toxicity.
`Among the 51 evaluable cases, 34 increased the dose of thalidomide
`as tolerated from 100 mg by mouth at bedtime to 400 mg by mouth at
`bedtime within 4 weeks of starting therapy, but only 8 were able to
`continue at that dose for a full 8 weeks (Table 1). The median duration of
`400 mg therapy for the rest was 14 days (range, 1-42 days). Thus,
`although some of the patients increased the dose levels successfully, the
`higher doses were maintained for only a short period, with the majority
`taking between 150 to 200 mg by mouth at bedtime.
`
`Response evaluation
`
`Of the 83 patients registered in this study, there were no complete
`responders. Sixteen patients showed a hematologic improvement
`as described in Table 2, with 15 responding in the erythroid series
`and 1 showing a minor platelet response. There were no ANC
`responders. Among the 15 showing HI in the erythroid series, 11
`had a major erythroid response and 4 had a minor erythroid
`response. Of the 11 major responders, 6 responded by reducing
`their PRBC transfusion requirements by 100%; 4 showed both a
`decrease in transfusions by 100% and an increase in Hb; and 1
`non–PRBC-dependent patient showed an increase in Hb of more
`than 2 g/dL. One of these patients also showed a minor platelet
`response. Figure 1 shows 5 of the erythroid responders. In addition,
`4 patients also had a minor erythroid response, as shown in Table 2.
`All of these 4 patients showed a 50% reduction in PRBC
`transfusions. The 16th patient had a minor platelet response.
`
`Time to response
`
`Five erythroid responders showed HI within 12 weeks of starting
`thalidomide, 6 within 16 weeks, and 4 at week 20. The platelet
`responder improved his count within 12 weeks of therapy.
`
`Response duration
`
`Comparison of clinical characteristics of patients who stopped
`therapy before 12 weeks versus those who continued for at
`least 12 weeks
`
`There were 2 significant differences between patients who stopped
`therapy before 12 weeks and those who continued. First, 17 of 32
`off-study patients belonged to the high-rish or INT-2 category,
`
`Patient no. 937 died of a reactivated low-grade lymphoma at day
`260. Of the other 15 responding patients, the median duration of
`response was 306 days (range, 90-620 days). Four patients are still
`responding and continuing to take thalidomide. Six patients
`stopped responding and are listed in Table 2. Of the remaining 5
`patients, 3 stopped owing to intolerable side effects, and 2 opted to
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1023 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`BLOOD, 15 AUGUST 2001 z VOLUME 98, NUMBER 4
`
`THALIDOMIDE CAUSES TRANSFUSION INDEPENDENCE IN MDS
`
`961
`
`Table 2. Hematological responses
`
`FAB
`
`BM cellularity
`
`PRBC
`dependent
`
`Responses
`
`Patient
`no.*
`
`Before After
`
`Before After Before After
`
`Reduction
`in PRBC, %
`
`Increase
`in Hb
`
`Platelets
`
`ANC
`
`Response type
`
`Response
`duration,
`d†
`
`Comment
`
`200
`
`Died of lymphoma
`
`Continues in
`remission
`
`Continues in
`remission
`Stopped responding
`Stopped after 1 year
`owing to side
`effects
`Continues in
`remission
`Continues in
`remission
`Stopped responding
`
`4221
`
`4541
`
`227
`306
`
`6201
`
`5271
`
`168
`
`239
`
`937 RA
`
`RA
`
`20
`
`30
`
`1011 RA
`
`RARS
`
`99
`
`70
`
`277 RA
`
`RA
`
`RARS
`963 RA
`400 RARS RARS
`
`460 RARS RARS
`
`1016 RA
`
`RA
`
`340 RARS RA
`
`90
`
`80
`70
`
`50
`
`30
`
`80
`
`N/A
`
`90
`70
`
`50
`
`30
`
`90
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`Y
`
`N
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`Y
`
`N
`
`N
`
`Y
`
`100
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`No
`
`100
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`No
`
`100
`
`100
`50
`
`100
`
`50
`
`No
`
`No
`No
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`HI-E major, 100% PRBC Tx
`reduction at wk 16; minor
`Hb response at wk 16
`HI-E major (PRBC), Tx
`independent at wk 16;
`major (Hb)
`HI-E major, 100% PRBC Tx
`reduction
`HI-E major
`HI-E minor, 50% PRBC Tx
`reduction
`
`No
`
`HI-E major (Hb)
`
`No
`
`HI-E major
`
`No
`
`333 RARS N/A
`
`585 RARS RA
`
`1023 RAEB RAEB
`
`1007 RA
`
`RA
`
`1010 RAEB RAEB
`
`988 RA
`
`RA
`
`50
`
`80
`
`60
`
`20
`
`40
`
`80
`
`N/A
`
`80
`
`70
`
`30
`
`10
`
`70
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`N
`
`Y
`
`N
`
`N
`
`50
`
`No
`
`100
`
`50
`
`100
`
`100
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`No
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`551 RA
`
`RA
`
`30
`
`N/A
`
`Y
`
`N
`
`100
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`274 RA
`
`RA
`
`10
`
`30
`
`Y
`
`N
`
`100
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`HI-E minor, at 16 wks and
`post-50% reduction in
`PRBC Tx
`50% PRBC reduction from
`wk 20 to wk 24 & 28
`H1-P minor
`
`HI-E major (PRBC), Tx
`independent at wk 16
`HI-E minor, 50% PRBC Tx
`reduction at wk 20,
`sustained for 8 wks
`HI-E major (PRBC) major
`(Hb)
`HI-E major, 100% PRBC Tx
`reduction at wk 16, minor
`Plt response at wk 16 (not
`wk 12 owing to plt Tx)
`HI-E major, Tx dependent
`until wk 20, then
`independent through wk
`28
`HI-E major, patient received
`2 U PRBC day 1 of
`treatment, then was Tx
`independent until wk 28
`with 2 U, then
`independent again
`
`Stopped owing to side
`effects
`Stopped owing to side
`effects
`Stopped responding
`
`Stopped owing to side
`effects
`
`90
`
`177
`
`365
`
`381
`
`Stopped responding
`
`359
`
`Stopped responding
`
`188
`
`Stopped responding
`
`365
`
`Stopped after 1 year
`owing to side
`effects
`
`BM indicates bone marrow; Hb, hemoglobin; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; HI-E, hematological improvement in erythroid series; Tx, transfusion; HI-P, hematological
`improvement in platelets; Plt, platelets; for other abbreviations, see Table 1.
`*Unique Rush Cancer Institute patient numbers.
`†Plus sign indicates a continuing response.
`
`stop after 1 year of therapy was completed and they were given the
`option of continuing or stopping.
`
`for both, P 5 .013), and a higher median pretherapy platelet count
`(142 000 versus 57 000/mL, P 5 .003).
`
`Comparison of clinical characteristics in
`responders and nonresponders
`
`A comparison of pretherapy characteristics in responders and nonre-
`sponders among the 51 patients who completed at least 12 weeks of
`therapy showed 3 significant findings (Table 3). Responders had a lower
`median percentage of blasts to begin with (2% versus 3%, respectively,
`P 5 .016), a shorter median duration of platelet transfusions (median 0
`
`Delayed response to thalidomide
`
`Acurious observation, which became apparent in a striking manner, was
`related to the matter of delayed response seen in one of the patients. This
`is described in greater detail below because it may throw some light on
`the possible mechanism by which thalidomide improves the cytopenias
`in MDS patients. This patient is considered a nonresponder by the
`criteria specified in this paper and is not included in Table 2.
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1023 PAGE 4
`
`

`

`962
`
`RAZA et al
`
`BLOOD, 15 AUGUST 2001 z VOLUME 98, NUMBER 4
`
`Figure 1. Hemoglobin and PRBC transfusions in 7 patients. These patients
`became transfusion independent on thalidomide. f, 2 units of PRBC transfused; 1,
`start of thalidomide.
`
`Patient no. 123
`
`This 65-year-old white male was diagnosed with MDS, RA,
`approximately 2 years before starting therapy with thalidomide
`(Figure 2). Cytogenetics revealed a complex karyotype including a
`20q deletion with further evolution in the clone. The patient
`received therapy for his primary MDS with the cytoprotective
`agent amifostine and a combination of pentoxifylline, ciprofloxa-
`
`Table 3. Clinical characteristics of responders and nonresponders
`
`Characteristics
`
`NR (n 5 35)
`
`R (n 5 16)
`
`Median levels
`
`Age, y
`MDS duration, d
`BM biopsy cellularity, %
`BM blasts, %
`PRBC duration, d
`Platelet transfusion
`duration, d
`Maximum thalidomide
`dose, mg/d
`Duration of maximum
`dose, d
`Hemoglobin, g/dL
`ANC, per mL
`Platelets, per mL
`Initial IPSS scores
`
`67
`670
`70
`3
`91
`
`0
`
`400
`
`14
`8.9
`1350
`57 000
`INT-1
`
`69
`321
`55
`2
`132
`
`0
`
`400
`
`12
`8.7
`1050
`142 000
`INT-1
`
`P
`
`.428
`.951
`.152
`.016*
`.79
`
`.013*
`
`.902
`
`.532
`.59
`.136
`.003*
`.468
`
`Figure 2. Delayed response. Peripheral blood indices in an MDS patient (no. 123)
`with RA showing a delayed response to therapy with thalidomide. 1, duration of
`thalidomide therapy (indicated between 2 arrows); f, 2 units of PRBC transfused.
`
`cin, and dexamethasone for 3 months as per protocol MDS 96-0236
`with no response, and with the TNF-soluble receptor Enbrel
`(Immunex, Seattle, WA)37 for 3 months, again with no appreciable
`hematopoietic response but with clearing of rather painful aphthous
`ulcers in his mouth. After a hiatus of several months during which
`he received only supportive care with frequent PRBC transfusions,
`he began taking thalidomide at 100 mg by mouth at bedtime on July
`1, 1999. His pretherapy CBC revealed a hemoglobin of 7.1 g/dL, an
`ANC of 200/mL, and platelets of 84 000/mL. He could not tolerate
`a dose of thalidomide greater than 200 mg by mouth at bedtime. At
`the end of 12 weeks, he was evaluated for response and was found
`to have no evidence of improvement in any of the cytopenias. The
`post-treatment CBC revealed a hemoglobin of 8.1 g/dL, an ANC of
`90/mL, and a platelet count of 38 000/mL. The platelets and ANC
`were found to be in a continuous decline. He was taken off the
`thalidomide on September 29, 1999, and entered a 3-month
`washout period before being considered for further experimental
`therapy. He continued to require red cell transfusions, the last one
`being on November 12, 1999. On December 1, 1999, his hemoglo-
`bin was 8.7 g/dL, his ANC was less than 200/mL, and his platelets
`had fallen to 18 000/mL. On December 16, 1999, his hemoglobin
`was still 8.4 g/dL, but he had not required a PRBC transfusion in
`over a month; his ANC was below 200/mL; and his platelets were
`18 000/mL. Interestingly, from the next week on, a steady improve-
`ment was noted in all 3 cell lines. The patient did not require
`another transfusion for approximately 9 months.
`
`Cytogenetic responses
`
`Cytogenetic results were available in 15 of 16 responders; 7 had a
`normal karyotype, 1 had 2Y, 1 had 81, 1 had del(20q), 1 had t(2;8), 1
`had der(7), and 3 had del(5q). No cytogenetic responses were observed.
`
`Discussion
`
`NR indicates nonresponders; R, responders; for other abbreviations, see Tables
`1 and 2.
`*Significant at .05 level.
`
`We report upon the success of thalidomide in alleviating the
`cytopenias of some patients with MDS. By the most conservative
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1023 PAGE 5
`
`

`

`BLOOD, 15 AUGUST 2001 z VOLUME 98, NUMBER 4
`
`THALIDOMIDE CAUSES TRANSFUSION INDEPENDENCE IN MDS
`
`963
`
`estimation, assuming that all patients who went off the study before
`being evaluable for a response were in fact nonresponders, the
`response rate is approximately 19% (16 of 83). In an analysis of
`only those patients who finished 12 weeks of therapy, approxi-
`mately 31% (16 of 51) of evaluable individuals responded, with 15
`of 16 showing an erythroid response; some of the responses were
`quite striking. Ten transfusion-dependent patients acquired transfu-
`sion independence. The current study using thalidomide is the
`latest in a series of clinical trials conducted over the last 6 years
`using anticytokine and cytoprotective agents34-37 aimed at improv-
`ing the ineffective hematopoiesis of MDS. An advantage of using
`thalidomide is that in addition to neutralizing the effects of some
`proinflammatory, proapoptotic cytokines,47-51 this drug is also a
`known modulator of the immune system45,46 as well as an
`antiangiogenic agent.52-54
`This pilot study was designed to test the efficacy of thalidomide
`in producing complete or partial remissions in either low- or
`high-risk patients with MDS. The response criteria specified in the
`protocol were similar to those that we and others have used in
`previous trials.34-37 As the study was reaching completion, how-
`ever, the report of an IWG to standardize response criteria for
`myelodysplastic syndromes was published,58 and it was considered
`more appropriate to use the standardized criteria to assess response.
`Given the complexity of the disease and the sensitivity of the
`proposed criteria, an independent team of investigators was asked
`to apply the IWG criteria for response evaluation. In this way, both
`investigator bias and confusion about precisely what is meant by a
`response were eliminated. One potentially confusing aspect of
`these recommendations is that the IWG did not specify the method
`for determining baseline values of ANCs, Hb counts, and platelet
`counts against which response is to be measured. For example,
`given the frequently fluctuating nature of cytopenias in MDS
`patients, and the fact that patients being considered for therapy are
`most likely to be transfusion dependent, these values can vary
`widely from week to week. It is therefore important to decide
`whether an average of several values or one pretherapy absolute
`CBC result will be used as the baseline. The same applies to the
`number of pretherapy transfusions. Finally,
`the IWG did not
`specify how the CBC values during therapy are to be handled for
`response evaluation. For example, an assessment can be made
`every 3 months or every 6 months, but should the average CBC
`results be used for each cycle? The IWG itself anticipated that
`future modifications would be made to its standardized criteria as
`independent investigators began to apply these recommendations
`to assess the results of their clinical trials. Therefore, modifications
`to the criteria were made related to the calculation of pretherapy
`baseline CBC values and values during therapy; these modifica-
`tions are described in detail in “Patients, materials, and methods.”
`We present the results of this analysis, showing that thalidomide is
`capable of producing major hematologic improvements in a subset
`of MDS patients, especially those with low-risk disease.
`Eighty-three patients were registered on the protocol, but only
`51 completed at least 12 weeks of therapy. Of these 51 patients, 34
`were able to increase the thalidomide dose to 400 mg within a
`month, but only 8 stayed at this dose for the remainder of their
`treatment duration. The rest could tolerate this dose for a median of
`2 weeks before decreasing back to the 100 to 200 mg range. A
`dose-response effect was not appreciated, and it can be concluded
`that maintaining the maximally tolerated dose for a longer period of
`up to 6 months is more important than pushing for a higher dose for
`a shorter duration. The most common dose-limiting side effects
`were related to fatigue (79%) and constipation (71%), followed by
`
`shortness of breath (54%) and fluid retention, as manifested
`frequently by ankle edema (54%). More than 50% of the patients
`had grades 1 and 2 toxicity, and fewer than 5% had grade 4
`shortness of breath and fluid retention. Of the 32 patients who were
`taken off the study, 6 had shown unequivocal signs of transforma-
`tion to AML; 11 discontinued the drug owing to worsening medical
`problems, some of which could also be due to disease progression;
`and 14 could not tolerate the side effects. Patients who discontinued
`therapy belonged to a higher risk MDS category than those who
`continued for at least 12 weeks as shown by both their IPSS scores
`(P 5 .002) as well as their initial bone

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket