throbber
Leukemia (1999) 13, 44–53
`(cid:211) 1999 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0887-6924/99 $12.00
`http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/leu
`
`Fas ligand expression in the bone marrow in myelodysplastic syndromes correlates
`with FAB subtype and anemia, and predicts survival
`P Gupta1, GA Niehans2, SC LeRoy1,3, K Gupta1, VA Morrison1, C Schultz1, DJ Knapp2 and RA Kratzke1
`
`Departments of 1Medicine and 2Pathology, and 3School of Public Health, Veterans Administration Medical Center and University of
`Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
`
`Increased apoptosis in the bone marrow (BM) may contribute
`to the cytopenias that occur in myelodysplastic syndromes
`(MDS). The Fas receptor, Fas ligand (FasL) pathway is a major
`mechanism of apoptosis. Since hematopoietic progenitors can
`express the Fas receptor, they may be susceptible to apoptosis
`induced by FasL-expressing cells. We examined FasL
`expression in the BM of patients with MDS (n= 50), de novo
`acute myeloid leukemia (AML; n= 10), AML following prior MDS
`(n= 6), and normal controls (n= 6). Compared to controls, FasL
`expression was increased in MDS, and was highest in AML. In
`MDS, FasL expression was seen in myeloid blasts, erythro-
`blasts, maturing myeloid cells, megakaryocytes and dysplastic
`cells, whereas in AML, intense expression was seen in the
`blasts. FasL expression correlated with the FAB subtype
`groups of MDS, and also correlated directly with the percentage
`of abnormal metaphases on cytogenetic analysis. The FasL
`expressed in MDS BM inhibited the growth of clonogenic hema-
`topoietic progenitors. This inhibition could be blocked by a sol-
`uble recombinant FasFc protein. In MDS, FasL expression in
`the initial diagnostic BM was higher in patients who were more
`anemic, correlated directly with red cell transfusion require-
`ments over the subsequent course of the disease, and was pre-
`dictive of survival. These studies indicate that FasL expression
`in MDS is of prognostic significance, and suggest that pharma-
`cological blockade of
`the Fas-FasL pathway may be of
`clinical benefit.
`Keywords: myelodysplastic syndromes; acute myeloid leukemia;
`apoptosis; prognostic factors; Fas ligand
`
`Introduction
`
`The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of dis-
`orders characterized by cytopenias, often in the presence of
`adequate or increased numbers of cells in the bone marrow,
`and an increased propensity to develop acute leukemia.1
`Death occurs more frequently from the consequences of
`chronic cytopenias than from transformation to acute myeloid
`leukemia (AML).2–4
`Several recent reports indicate that a high proportion of
`bone marrow (BM) cells are undergoing apoptosis in patients
`with MDS,5–15 which may contribute to the cytopenias that
`occur in these disorders. A correlation between apoptosis and
`cytopenias in MDS has been observed in some studies but not
`in others.6–14 There are several possible reasons for variability
`in correlation between the extent of apoptosis detected in the
`marrow and the clinical features of MDS. It is possible that in
`situ end labeling may not detect a proportion of apoptotic
`cells that can be identified by other methods.16 Further, since
`apoptosis is a dynamic process, assays for apoptosis at one
`time point in complex tissues, such as the marrow, may not
`accurately reflect the total number of cells having undergone
`
`Correspondence: P Gupta, Hematology/Oncology Section 111E, VA
`Medical Center, One Veteran’s Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA;
`Fax: +1 612 725 2149
`Received 18 March 1998; accepted 8 September 1998
`
`apoptosis over time. Certain assays may fail to detect cells at
`early stages of apoptosis, whereas cells at
`later stages of
`apoptosis may already have been rapidly removed by reticulo-
`endothelial cells in the marrow. Moreover,
`the extent of
`apoptosis seen may depend on the proportions of residual nor-
`mal hematopoietic cells and of blasts in the sample, since the
`former but not the latter may be apoptotic. Thus, paradoxi-
`cally, a higher degree of apoptosis may be seen in marrows
`with low blast counts and a higher content of normal hemato-
`poietic cells.8
`One major mechanism for apoptosis in both hematopoietic
`and non-hematopoietic cells is the Fas pathway. Fas is a tumor
`necrosis factor-receptor (TNF-R) family cell surface receptor
`that induces apoptosis when ligated by Fas ligand (FasL), a
`cell surface TNF family molecule.17 Since normal hematopo-
`ietic cells express Fas receptor,18–24 they may be susceptible
`to apoptosis triggered by FasL-expressing cells. Mature periph-
`eral blood cells including neutrophils express high levels of
`Fas and are susceptible to Fas-mediated apoptosis,23 whereas
`normal progenitors express low levels of Fas and are not sus-
`ceptible to Fas-mediated apoptosis.25 However, on normal
`CD34+ hematopoietic cells, Fas expression is synergistically
`induced by TNF-a and interferon-g (IFN-g),
`resulting in
`increased susceptibility of clonogenic, as well as primitive
`progenitors to Fas-mediated apoptosis.18,19,26 In aplastic ane-
`mia, the increased expression of TNF-band IFN-gin the BM is
`accompanied by increased Fas on CD34+ cells and increased
`susceptibility of clonogenic progenitors to Fas-mediated kill-
`ing.27 In addition, TNF-a expression is increased in the BM of
`patients with MDS, and correlates with the degree of
`apoptosis.28
`A proportion of BM and peripheral blood cells are derived
`from normal progenitors in MDS,29,30 indicating that residual
`normal hematopoiesis contributes to the maintenance of per-
`ipheral blood cells in patients with MDS. The finding that
`CD34+ cells, differentiating hematopoietic cells and stromal
`cells undergo increased apoptosis6,9,10 suggests that cells
`derived from both the abnormal clone and those derived from
`normal progenitors may be apoptotic in MDS. Recent studies
`indicate that in MDS, the Fas pathway is functional and cap-
`able of inducing apoptosis in clonogenic progenitors when
`expressed on CD34+, CD33+
`activated.
`Fas
`is
`and
`glycophorin+ cells in MDS, and both erythroid and granulo-
`cyte–macrophage colony-forming cells are susceptible to
`apoptosis induced by an agonist anti-Fas antibody.7,8
`A variety of tumor cell types express FasL, the ligand for the
`Fas receptor.31–35 Malignant cells appear to possess mech-
`anisms to protect themselves against FasL-mediated apoptosis,
`while maintaining the ability to induce apoptosis in normal
`cells.6,35,36 Recent reports indicate that FasL expression is
`increased in MDS.15,37 We hypothesized that the expression
`of FasL (1) is increased in the bone marrow of patients with
`MDS; (2) contributes to the cytopenias observed in these dis-
`orders by its effects on hematopoietic progenitors; and (3) cor-
`
`Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`IPR2018-01504
`Exhibit 2015, Page 1
`
`

`

`relates with cytopenia and prognosis. We demonstrate that
`FasL expression is significantly increased in MDS and AML,
`that FasL expressed by MDS marrow cells directly inhibits the
`growth of hematopoietic progenitors in vitro, and that FasL
`expression correlates with anemia and predicts transfusion
`requirements and survival in patients with MDS.
`
`Methods
`
`Patients
`
`A cohort of 50 consecutive patients diagnosed with MDS and
`10 with AML at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center from
`1992–1997 were identified by retrospective review of BM
`pathology records. Clinical information, including features at
`presentation, clinical course and outcome, was obtained by
`chart review. The demographic characteristics of the patients
`and clinical features at presentation are shown in Table 1. All
`the patients were males, reflecting the patient population at
`the Minneapolis VA Medical Center. The French–American–
`British (FAB) classification of the 50 patients with MDS was:
`RA (n = 4), RA with ringed sideroblasts (RARS; n = 6), RA with
`excess blasts (RAEB; n = 10), RAEB in transformation (RAEBT;
`n = 7), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML; n = 13),
`and unclassified MDS (n = 10). Forty patients required blood
`product transfusions: RBC (n = 19), platelets (n = 2), or both
`products (n = 19). To normalize RBC transfusion requirements
`over time, the total number of units of RBC transfused between
`the diagnosis of MDS and either death or transformation to
`AML were converted to the average number of units trans-
`fused per 6 months, as follows: Number of units transfused
`between diagnosis of MDS and death or transformation to
`AML/Time in months from diagnosis of MDS to death or trans-
`formation to AML · 6. Patients included in this study were
`treated with pyridoxine (n = 7), androgens (n = 1), prednisone
`(n = 1), hydroxyurea (n = 2), 6-thioguanine + cytosine arabino-
`side (n = 1), 5-azacytidine (n = 2), erythropoietin (EPO; n = 2),
`and folic acid (n = 4). The remaining patients received only
`
`Table 1
`
`Clinical features of 50 patients with MDS
`
`Age (years), median (range)
`Hemoglobin (g/dl), median
`(range)
`WBC (per mm3), median
`(range)
`Platelet count (per mm3), median (range)
`Absolute neutrophil count (per mm3), median
`(range)
`Absolute monocyte count (per mm3), median
`(range)
`Blasts in peripheral blood (%), median (range)
`Reticulocytes (%), median (range)
`LDH (number of patients)
`Elevated
`Normal
`BM cellularity (number of patients):
`hypercellular; normocellular; hypocellular
`BM blasts (%), median (range)
`Bournemouth prognostic score (number of
`patients)
`0; 1; 2; 3; 4
`Cytogenetic analysis
`Abnormal
`Normal
`
`73 (26–87)
`10.2
`(7.5–13.8)
`4.3
`(1.1–112.6)
`120 (6–693)
`2.5
`(0.3–44.3)
`0.4
`(0.0–22.6)
`0.0 (0.0–9.0)
`2.0 (0.1–8.8)
`
`13
`19
`
`36; 7; 7
`2.6 (0.2–24)
`11; 11; 11;
`11; 6
`
`15
`23
`
`Fas ligand expression in myelodysplastic syndromes
`P Gupta etal
`
`supportive treatment. One patient underwent allogeneic bone
`marrow transplantation. Five of 50 patients (10%) have trans-
`formed to AML to date. Twenty-nine of 50 patients (58%) have
`died,
`largely of complications
`related directly to MDS
`(infection in 12, hemorrhage in 7, AML in 4).
`
`45
`
`Immunohistochemical staining for FasL
`
`FasL expression was determined on BM samples that had been
`obtained at diagnosis of MDS, prior to treatment, by modifi-
`cation of a previous method.31 Sections (5 mm thick) were cut
`from bone marrow aspirate clots embedded in paraffin in B-
`5 fixative and mounted on poly-l-lysine-coated slides. The
`sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated through
`graded alcohols and demercurized in alcoholic iodine.
`Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by immersing
`the slides in 1.5% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min at room tem-
`perature, followed by rehydration through three changes of
`distilled water. To induce heat-induced epitope retrieval,
`slides were immersed in 10 mm citrate buffer (pH 6.0) in a
`pressure cooker which was heated to boiling at 12 psi for
`10 min and then cooled to room temperature over 20 min.
`Nonspecific binding was blocked by incubating sections with
`15 mg/ml horse serum for 15 min at room temperature. The
`sections were then incubated for 1 h with 0.6 mg/ml mouse
`MAb against residues 116–277 of human FasL (MAb clone
`33; Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY, USA). Negative
`control sections were incubated with nonimmune mouse
`serum or ascites fluid diluted 1:400 in PBS. Following incu-
`bation for 30 min with horse anti-mouse secondary antiserum,
`sections were immunolabeled using an avidin-biotin-immuno-
`peroxidase method (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA,
`USA). The chromogen was a solution of 0.5 mg/ml 3,39-diami-
`nobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) and 0.009% hydrogen
`peroxide. Color development was terminated after 5 min by
`immersion in water. To differentiate iron deposits in hemato-
`poietic cells, sections were immersed in equal parts of 5%
`potassium ferrocyanide and 5% HCl for 5 min. Sections were
`finally counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated and
`coverslipped with permount. FasL expressing cells were ident-
`ified by granular intracytoplasmic staining. In each section,
`1000 cells were scored for FasL expression by a pathologist
`(GAN) who was blinded to the FAB subtype and clinical infor-
`mation regarding the patients.
`Additional sections from some of the same BM samples
`were immunostained using another anti-FasL primary anti-
`body (Q20, a rabbit polyclonal directed against N-terminal
`amino acid residues 2–21; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa
`Cruz, CA, USA). Heat-induced epitope retrieval was induced
`the sections in 10 mm citrate buffer for
`by incubation of
`20 min at 100(cid:176) C, at atmospheric pressure. Sections were incu-
`bated with 1 mg/ml of the primary antibody for 45 min, and
`developed with a multi-link secondary antibody using the
`Vector Elite kit (Vector). To further confirm the specificity of
`the staining for FasL, blocking experiments were performed
`by pre-incubation of the sections with a four-fold excess of a
`blocking peptide (amino acid residues 2–21 of FasL).
`The immunohistochemistry technique described can be
`used on BM clot specimens which have been fixed in either
`B5 or formalin, but not in Zenker’s or Bouin’s fixatives. Also,
`the process used for decalcification of BM trephine specimens
`renders FasL undetectable by this method.
`
`Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`IPR2018-01504
`Exhibit 2015, Page 2
`
`

`

`Fas ligand expression in myelodysplastic syndromes
`P Gupta etal
`
`46
`
`Immunoblotting for FasL
`
`BM was aspirated in preservative-free heparin from the pos-
`terior iliac crest of patients with MDS or healthy volunteers
`after obtaining written informed consent. The study was
`approved by the VA Medical Center Human Subjects Sub-
`committee. The BM aspirates were immediately subjected to
`Ficoll–Hypaque (sg 1.077) centrifugation. BM mononuclear
`cells (BMMNC) at the interface were aspirated, washed three
`times, counted and resuspended in Iscove’s modified Dulbec-
`co’s medium (IMDM) + 20% fetal calf serum + 20% dimethyl-
`sulfoxide, and stored in liquid nitrogen following controlled
`rate
`freezing, until used in co-culture with normal
`CD34+/HLA-DR+ cells or for immunoblotting. For immuno-
`blotting, the frozen cells were rapidly warmed to 37(cid:176) C, diluted
`in warm IMDM,
`and immunoblotting performed as
`described.31 Briefly, BMMNC were pelleted and lysed in 1 ml
`of 50 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 250 mm NaCl, 5 mm EDTA, 0.1%
`NP40, 50 mm NaF and 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride.
`Approximately 30 mg of total protein from each sample was
`electrophoresed on 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel, and electroblotted
`on to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were
`blocked using 5% dry milk + 1% BSA in PBS, incubated with
`1:1000
`dilution
`of murine
`anti-human
`FasL MAb
`(Transduction Laboratories) at 4(cid:176) C overnight and then with a
`rabbit anti-murine IgG antibody (PharMingen, San Diego, CA,
`USA). Protein bands were visualized by enhanced chemilumi-
`nescence as recommended by the manufacturer (Amersham,
`Arlington Heights, IL, USA).
`In parallel, membranes were incubated with 1.5 mg/ml of a
`different primary antibody (anti-FasL IgG MAb clone G-247-
`4; PharMingen) for 1 h at room temperature. Following incu-
`bation with a secondary antibody, FasL was detected using an
`enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham). A pGEX2TK-
`FasL fusion protein (size approximately 60 kDa), possessing
`the full-length recombinant human FasL protein with a GST
`leader was run as a positive control, to confirm the capability
`of the antibody to recognize human FasL.
`
`Effect of FasL expressed by MDS BM cells on growth
`of clonogenic progenitors
`
`CD34+/HLA-DR+ (DR+) cells were purified from bone marrow
`aspirates taken from normal adult donors, by sequential Fic-
`oll–Hypaque (sg 1.077) centrifugation, Ceprate-LC (CellPro,
`Bothell, WA, USA) CD34-biotin immunoadsorption column
`selection and flow cytometry, as previously described.38 To
`simulate the effect of increased levels of TNFa found in the
`marrow in MDS,28 the DR+ cells were suspended at a concen-
`tration of 100 000/ml
`in long-term bone marrow culture
`(LTBMC) medium (12.5% FCS, 12.5% horse serum, 2 mm l-
`glutamine, 1000 U/ml penicillin, 100 U/ml streptomycin and
`10- 6 m hydrocortisone) supplemented with 100 ng/ml TNFa
`(Sigma) and 10 ng/ml interleukin (IL)-3 (R&D Systems, Minne-
`apolis, MN, USA) and incubated at 37(cid:176) C in 5% CO2 atmos-
`phere for 48 h.
`For co-cultures of DR+ cells with cell
`lysates of MDS
`BMMNC, the frozen cells were rapidly warmed to 37(cid:176) C and
`diluted in warm IMDM. The cells were pelleted gently, resus-
`pended in IMDM at a concentration of 25 · 106/ml and lysed
`by snap-freezing and thawing three times. Lysates from
`2 · 105 or 2 · 106 MDS BMMNC were mixed with 2000 DR+
`cells in IMDM + 10% FCS + 10 ng/ml TNFa + 10 ng/ml
`interleukin-3 (IL-3) and incubated at 37(cid:176) C in 5% CO2 for 18 h.
`
`In some cultures, the MDS cell lysates were incubated with
`either 10 mg/ml recombinant FasFc protein (R&D Systems),
`50 mg/ml neutralizing anti-TNFa antibody (R&D Systems), or
`both, for 1 h at room temperature, to block the FasL39 and
`TNFapresent, prior to addition of the DR+ cells to the lysates.
`For control cultures, DR+ cells were incubated with the cyto-
`kines in the absence of cell lysates. Following the incubation,
`cells were washed once with IMDM + 20% FCS to remove
`cytokines, cell debris and FasFc, and plated in semisolid
`methylcellulose cultures supplemented with 3 U/ml EPO and
`5 ng/ml IL-3. In cultures examining the effect of FasFc protein
`and anti-TNFa antibody, additional FasFc (0.5 mg/ml) and
`anti-TNFa antibody (2.5 mg/ml) were added directly to the
`methylcellulose medium. Colonies were scored after 14
`days.40
`
`Statistics
`
`Data were entered on and analyzed using an SPSS software
`package. Mean differences between groups were compared
`using either the t-test or ANOVA. Correlations of interval scale
`variables were analyzed using linear regression. Overall sur-
`vival by FasL expression (FasL <12% and FasL .12%) was
`analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method41 and compared using
`the log-rank statistic. In addition, the correlation between %
`FasL expression and overall survival was analyzed using Cox
`regression. Results were expressed as the mean –
`s.e.m.
`
`Results
`
`FasL expression is increased in MDS and AML
`
`We examined by immunohistochemistry (Figures 1 and 2) the
`expression of FasL in the BM of patients with MDS, AML
`developing in patients with MDS (secondary AML), de novo
`AML and age- and sex-matched normal controls. Immunohis-
`tochemistry was performed using two separate anti-FasL anti-
`bodies, directed against a C-terminal epitope (MAb clone 33;
`Figure 1) or an N-terminal epitope of FasL (polyclonal anti-
`body Q20; Figure 2). There was a high degree of correlation
`(r = 0.97) between the percentage of FasL positive cells
`(normal controls, MDS and AML) detected by the two anti-
`bodies, MAb clone 33 and polyclonal Q20 (data not shown).
`In the BM of normal controls (n = 6), a uniformly low level of
`FasL expression was detected (6 – 1% positive cells; range 3–
`9%) and was mostly confined to lymphocytes (Figures 1a and
`3a). In contrast, a wide range of FasL expression was seen in
`the BM of patients with MDS (n = 50; 17 – 2% positive cells;
`range 2–51%; Figures 1b, 1c, 2a, 2c and 3a), which was
`higher than the controls (p = 0.02). FasL expression in MDS
`was seen in erythroblasts, myeloblasts, megakaryocytes, mat-
`uring myeloid precursors and dysplastic cells, and was not
`confined to lymphocytes (Figures 1 and 2). Mature neutrophils
`and erythroid normoblasts did not express detectable FasL.
`The staining in both MDS and AML BM cells by the Q20 anti-
`body was almost completely blocked by pre-incubation of the
`sections with a peptide (amino acids 2–12 of FasL) comprising
`the epitope for the Q20 antibody (Figures 2b, d and f).
`FasL expression in MDS was further confirmed by immuno-
`blot analysis of BMMNC. A protein of the expected size for
`FasL (37 kDa) was recognized by a murine anti-human FasL
`antibody (MAb clone 33)
`in lysates from MDS BMMNC
`(Figure 1f). The level of FasL protein expression was signifi-
`
`Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`IPR2018-01504
`Exhibit 2015, Page 3
`
`

`

`Fas ligand expression in myelodysplastic syndromes
`P Gupta etal
`
`47
`
`(a–e) Immunohistochemical detection of FasL expression in BM clot sections. (a) Normal control with occasional FasL+ lymphocytes
`Figure 1
`(arrow); (b) MDS, unclassified, with 31% FasL+ cells. FasL in blast cells (arrow) and in a megakaryocyte (arrowhead); (c) MDS, RAEB, with 51%
`FasL+ cells; (d) AML M5 subtype, with intensely FasL+ blasts and negative erythroblasts (arrow); (e) AML M5, negative control using preimmune
`serum in place of the anti-human FasL MAb (Transduction Laboratories MAb clone 33). Original magnification · 800. (f) Immunoblotting analysis
`of FasL expression in MDS. FasL expression was examined in cell lysates (30 mg total protein per lane) of BMMNC from MDS patients and from
`normal controls. The lung cancer cell line H2009 which expresses FasL31 was used as a positive control. A 37 kDa protein was detected by
`an anti-human FasL MAb (Transduction Laboratories MAb clone 33).
`
`cantly higher in MDS than in normal control BMMNC, using
`equivalent quantities of total protein from cell lysates. FasL
`(37 kDa) was also detected in MDS BMMNC by immunoblot-
`ting with another primary antibody (anti-FasL IgG MAb clone
`G-247-4, PharMingen), which also recognized the 60 kDa
`recombinant FasL fusion protein (Figure 2g). Taken together,
`these results indicate that FasL is expressed in BM cells in both
`MDS and AML.
`In the BM of patients with de novo AML (n = 10), an
`extremely high proportion of cells showed FasL expression
`(56 – 9%; range 10–97%; Figures 1d, 2e and 3a) which was
`higher than that found in controls (P = 0.001) and patients
`with MDS (P , 0.001). FasL expression in AML was largely
`seen in the blast cells, which showed intense positivity for the
`protein (Figures 1d and 2e). In all three patients studied, FasL
`
`expression increased at least three-fold upon transformation
`of MDS to secondary AML (Figure 3b). In three additional
`patients with secondary AML, FasL expression ranged from 56
`to 86% (initial diagnostic MDS marrows were not available
`for FasL staining in these patients). As in de novo AML,
`expression of FasL was seen largely in the blasts in secondary
`AML. The overall FasL expression in secondary AML (n = 6;
`48 – 13%; range, 9–86%) was comparable to de novo AML.
`
`FasL expression correlates with FAB subtypes of MDS
`
`A significant correlation was observed between FasL
`expression and FAB subtype groups of MDS:RA/RARS (9 – 3%
`FasL positive cells), CMML (14 – 3%), RAEB/RAEBT (20 – 3%)
`
`Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`IPR2018-01504
`Exhibit 2015, Page 4
`
`

`

`48
`
`Fas ligand expression in myelodysplastic syndromes
`P Gupta etal
`
`Figure 2
`(a–f) Immunohistochemical detection of FasL expression in BM clot sections. Sections were incubated with Q20, a rabbit polyclonal
`directed against N-terminal amino acid residues 2–21 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). (a) MDS, unclassified (c) MDS, RAEB-T (e) AML M5 subtype.
`Photomicrographs b, d and f are sections from the same marrows, which were pre-incubated with a blocking peptide (amino acid residues 2–
`21 of FasL) before staining with the antibody, demonstrating that the staining is blocked by the FasL peptide containing the epitope for the
`antibody. Original magnification · 320 (a,b,e,f) and · 800 (c,d). (g) Immunoblotting of FasL expression in MDS. FasL expression was examined
`in cell lysates (30 mg total protein per lane) of BMMNC from three MDS patients, using a third primary antibody (anti-FasL IgM MAb clone G-
`247-4, PharMingen). A pGEX2T/K-FasL fusion protein (60 kDa), with the full-length recombinant human FasL protein and a GST leader was
`used as a positive control. A 37 kDa protein corresponding to FasL was detected in all three MDS samples.
`
`Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`IPR2018-01504
`Exhibit 2015, Page 5
`
`

`

`Fas ligand expression in myelodysplastic syndromes
`P Gupta etal
`
`49
`
`Figure 3
`(a) FasL expression in MDS and AML. FasL expression
`was determined as described in Methods in the BM of patients with
`morphologically normal marrows (normal controls) and in the initial
`diagnostic BM of patients with MDS, de novo AML and secondary
`AML (AML developing in patients with known prior MDS). Compari-
`son between normal controls and other categories: *P = 0.02, §P =
`0.009, ¶P = 0.001; comparison between MDS and other categories:
`**P , 0.001. (b) FasL expression following transformation of MDS to
`secondary AML. FasL expression in three patients at diagnosis of MDS
`(RA = 1, RARS = 1, RAEBT = 1) and at transformation to secondary
`AML.
`and unclassified MDS (22 – 4%); P = 0.028 (Figure 4a). The
`high expression of FasL in unclassified MDS was somewhat
`surprising. However, patients included in the unclassified cat-
`egory had significant dysplasia in all three lineages, even
`though the proportion of blasts in the BM was ,5%. The pres-
`ence of dysmegakaryopoiesis or dysgranulopoiesis has pre-
`viously been shown to adversely impact survival in MDS.42
`The majority of patients with unclassified MDS experienced a
`short survival in our study. BM cytogenetic analysis was avail-
`able for 38 patients. In the patients who had detectable abnor-
`malities, FasL expression correlated directly with the percent-
`age of abnormal metaphases on cytogenetic analysis
`(P = 0.022; Figure 4b). This suggests that FasL expression may
`correlate directly with the proportion of the marrow replaced
`by the progeny of the abnormal clone in MDS.
`
`The FasL expressed by MDS cells inhibits the growth
`of clonogenic progenitors
`
`report,15 we observed FasL
`In agreement with a recent
`expression in myeloid, erythroid and mononuclear cells in
`
`Figure 4
`(a) Correlation of FasL expression with subtype groups of
`MDS. Patients were combined into four groups on the basis of FAB
`categories and prognosis: RA + RARS, CMML, RAEB + RAEBT and
`unclassified (patients who could not be assigned to a specific FAB
`category). Comparison between RAEB/RAEBT or unclassified and
`RA/RARS: *P = 0.028. (b) Correlation of FasL expression with the pro-
`portion of abnormal metaphases. FasL expression in the BM was cor-
`related with the percentage of abnormal metaphases on cytogenetic
`analysis performed on the same marrow aspirate obtained at diagnosis
`of MDS. n = 13, r = 0.62, P = 0.022.
`
`MDS. We therefore examined if the FasL expressed by cells
`in MDS BM is functionally active in inhibiting the growth of
`hematopoietic progenitors. A significant and dose-dependent
`inhibition of the growth of clonogenic progenitors was seen
`in the presence of MDS BMMNC lysates (Figure 5a). The
`growth of erythroid BFU-E as well as myeloid CFU-GM pro-
`genitors was inhibited, as reflected in inhibition of the total
`numbers of colonies formed. To examine if this inhibition was
`mediated by TNFa, FasL or both, we evaluated the effect of
`addition of neutralizing anti-TNFa antibody, soluble FasFc
`protein (which specifically binds and blocks FasL)31,39 or both,
`in presence or absence of MDS cell lysates (Figure 5b). In the
`absence of MDS cell lysates, neither the anti-TNFa antibody
`nor FasFc altered colony formation significantly. However, the
`inhibition of progenitor growth by MDS cell lysates was larg-
`ely prevented by pre-incubation of the MDS cell lysates with
`FasFc, but not anti-TNFa. The simultaneous addition of both
`FasFc and anti-TNFa did not
`further augment progenitor
`growth over that seen with FasFc alone. Using DR+ cells from
`the same donors and cell lysates from the same MDS patients,
`we observed that the frequency of apoptotic cells in the DR+
`population (detected by the TUNEL assay or by annexin V
`
`Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`IPR2018-01504
`Exhibit 2015, Page 6
`
`

`

`50
`
`Fas ligand expression in myelodysplastic syndromes
`P Gupta etal
`
`Figure 5
`Effect of FasL expressed by MDS BM cells on the growth
`of normal clonogenic progenitors. (a) Dose-dependent inhibition of
`normal progenitor growth in presence of MDS cell lysates. Lysates of
`BM mononuclear cells from four separate MDS patients were each
`cultured with DR+ cells from three separate BM donors, as described
`in Methods. Two thousand DR+ cells were cultured with lysates from
`2 · 105 MDS cells (effector:target (E:T) ratio, 100:1) or 2 · 106 cells
`(E:T ratio, 1000:1). As controls, DR+ cells were cultured in the absence
`of MDS cell lysates (no MDS cells). Comparison between control cul-
`tures and other conditions: *P , 0.001, §P = 0.02. (b) Effect of anti-
`TNFa antibody and FasFc protein on MDS cell
`lysate-mediated
`growth inhibition. DR+ cells (2000 cells each) were cultured in pres-
`ence or absence of MDS cell lysates (2 · 105 cells), with or without
`a neutralizing anti-TNFa antibody or soluble FasFc protein. As con-
`trols, DR+ cells were cultured in the absence of MDS cell lysates, anti-
`TNFa or FasFc. n = 3. Comparison between controls and DR+ with
`MDS lysates: *P = 0.027, §P = 0.006. Comparison between DR+ with
`MDS lysates and other conditions: ¶P = 0.040, **P , 0.02, §§P = 0.02,
`§§P , 0.05.
`
`staining) increased from 3% in controls to 10% in the pres-
`ence of the MDS lysate, but was reduced to 6% by pre-
`incubation of the lysate with FasFc (data not shown).
`
`Expression of FasL correlates with anemia in MDS
`
`We next examined if FasL expression in the initial diagnostic
`BM of the 50 patients with MDS correlated with features of
`the clinical presentation and the subsequent disease course.
`FasL expression in the initial diagnostic BM was higher in
`patients with an initial hemoglobin ,10 g/dl vs hemoglobin
`>10 g/dl (20 – 3% vs 13 – 2%, respectively; P = 0.03; Figure
`6a). Also,
`there was a direct correlation between FasL
`expression in the initial diagnostic BM and the average num-
`ber of units of pRBC transfusions required per 6 months over
`the subsequent disease course (P = 0.039). Thus, patients with
`high FasL expression required more pRBC transfusions than
`patients with low FasL expression. There was a trend towards
`higher FasL expression in the BM of patients with more severe
`
`Figure 6
`(a) Correlation of FasL expression with hemoglobin. FasL
`expression at diagnosis was correlated with hemoglobin at diagnosis.
`Comparison between Hb ,10 g/dl and Hb >10 g/dl: P = 0.031.
`(b) Overall survival of patients expressing low and high levels of FasL
`at diagnosis. The overall survival stratified by FasL expression (FasL
`<12% and FasL .12%) from diagnosis of MDS (n = 50) was estimated
`by the Kaplan–Meier method41 and compared using the log-rank test.
`Comparison between FasL <12% and FasL .12%: P = 0.035.
`
`neutropenia, though this did not achieve statistical signifi-
`cance (P = 0.06). No correlation was detected between FasL
`expression and age, platelet count, need for platelet trans-
`fusions, lactate dehydrogenase level, marrow cellularity, per-
`centage of blasts, type of therapy or response to therapy.
`
`FasL expression predicts survival in MDS
`
`FasL expression was predictive of survival in the 50 MDS
`patients studied (median survival 28 months for FasL <12%
`vs 13 months for FasL .12%; P = 0.035; Figure 6b). The 2-
`year survival was 60 and 21%, respectively. FasL expression
`also correlated directly with survival of these 50 patients as a
`single group (P = 0.04 by Cox regression analysis). A number
`of studies have confirmed the prognostic significance of the
`Bournemouth scoring system, in which a score from 0–4 is
`assigned based on hemoglobin, neutrophil count, platelet
`count and blast percentage at diagnosis.3 We observed a sig-
`nificant correlation between Bournemouth score and survival
`in our patients (P = 0.019 by Cox regression analysis). The
`expression of FasL directly correlated with the Bournemouth
`prognostic score (P = 0.02). That FasL expression correlates
`
`Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`IPR2018-01504
`Exhibit 2015, Page 7
`
`

`

`51
`
`with an independent, validated prognostic scoring system
`further suggests that it may have potential value in predicting
`the survival of patients with MDS.
`
`Discussion
`
`Recent reports demonstrate that the response of cytopenias to
`EPO and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) ther-
`apy43 or to inhibition of TNF-a is associated with reduction
`in the proportion of apoptotic cells in the BM.10,22,44 These
`studies indicate that apoptosis is a clinically important
`phenomenon in MDS. Our studies demonstrate a correlation
`between the expression of FasL, the molecule which triggers
`Fas-mediated apoptosis, and the clinical features and prog-
`nosis of MDS. We further show that FasL expressed in MDS
`BM directly inhibits the growth of clonogenic hematopoietic
`progenitors. A recent report15 demonstrating that the apoptotic
`(TUNEL positive) cells in MDS BM express both Fas receptor
`and Fas ligand, further supports our results.
`We observed that apoptosis of FACS sorted DR+ cells was
`increased in

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket