throbber
November 20, 2001
`
`HEALTH SCIENCES
`
`LIBRARIES
`
`VOLUME 98
`
`,
`
`NUMBER 11
`NOVEMBER 16. 2001
`
`PART 1 OF 2 PARTS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`American Society of
`
`Hematology
`
`Forty-third annual
`
`
`
`
`
`meeting program
`
`and abstracts
`
`
`December 7-11. 2001
`
`
`Orlando, Florida
`
` *2 .
`
`'
`9‘
`‘
`.
`
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1075 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`PROGRAM OF THE 43RD ANNUAL MEETING OF
`
`THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY
`
`Decemb er 7-11, 2001
`
`Orlando, Florida
`
`Printed in the USA
`Copyright© 200 1, The American Society of Hematology, Washington, D.C .
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1075 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`NOVEL MYELOMA THERAPIES
`
`Ab stract# 3224
`
`Apoptotic S ig n a li ng Induced b y Immunomodulatory Thalidomid e
`Anal o g s ( I m i d s )
`in Human Multiple M y el oma Ce ll s : Therapeuti c
`Implica tion s. Nicholas M itsiades* , 1 Consta n ti ne S. Mitsia des*, ' Vassi liki
`Poulak i *,' Masaharu Akiyama* , ' Yu -Tzu Tai*,' Boris K . Lin* , ' Tosh iaki
`Hayashi",' Lawrence Calley* ,' Teru H id e shim a *,' Dharminde r C hauhan* ,'
`Steven P. Treon" ,' Kenneth C. A n derson. '
`I Department of Adult Oncology.
`Dana Farber Cancer Institute. Boston. MA ; lMassachlisetts Eye and Ear
`Infirmary, Boston, MA.
`Thalidomide (Thai) achieves responses even in the setting ofrefractory multiple myeloma
`(MM). Although increased angiogenesis in MM bo ne marrow and the anti -angiogenic
`effectof ThaI formed the empiric basis for its use in MM, Tha I and its immunomodulatory
`analogs (IMiDs) may also inhibit the production of cytokines in the bon e marrow and
`stimulateNK cell anti -MM immunity. Our prior studies have also demonstra ted that IMiDI
`(Celgene, Warren , NJ) is several-fold mo re potent than Thai in inhibiting the growt h ofMM
`cellsand directly induces apoptosis in the M M. IS MM ce ll line. We therefore invest igate d
`funherthe mechanism of its pro-apoptotic activity, in particular the role of caspases and the
`pro-survival transcription facto r NF-kB. Usi ng a colorimetric activity assay , we found that
`IMiDI induced cas pase-S, but not caspase-9, activity in MM . IS ce lls. Moreover, the caspase(cid:173)
`8 specific inhibitor IETD- FMK , but not the caspase 9 inhibi tor LE HD-F MK, prote cted
`MM.IS cells from IMiDI-induced cell death . Cas pase -8 is a key mediator ofdeath receptor(cid:173)
`mediated apop tosis and can be inhib ited by the anti-apoptotic protein s c1AP2 and FLIP.
`We found that lM iDI sensit ized MM . IS cells to low concentrations of Fas-cros slinking Ab
`CH1\ , and do wnregulated c1AP 2 and FLIP, but not BcI-2, protein expre ssio n. The
`constitutive act ivity of NF-KB, a pro-surv ival transcri ption factor that upregulates c1AP2
`andFLIP expression in various mode ls, was also dec reased upon treatment with IM iD I, as
`wasthe expression of another NF- kB target gene, the adhesio n molecule ICAM- I. IMiD I
`alsoblocked the stimulatory effec t of Insu lin-like Growth Facto r (IGF)- I on NF-KB activity
`and c1AP2 and FLIP protei n levels. Importan tly, (MiD I poten tiated the anti-MM act ivity
`ofdexamethasone and the proteaso me inhibitor PS341 (Mille nniu m, Cambridge, MA). These
`studiesboth delineate the mechanis ms ofactio n of IM iD I aga inst MM ce lls in vitro and form
`the basis for clinical trials of these agents, alo ne and coupled with conve ntional and other
`noveltherap ies, to improve outcome in MM.
`
`Ab stract# 3225
`I
`Immunomodulatory
`an
`S t u dy of Oral CC 5 0 13,
`A Pha s e
`Th alidomide (T h a I)
`D eri vati v e ,
`in Pati ent s with Relapsed and
`Refra ct ory Multiple Myelom a
`( M M),
`P, G. R ich ard s on , ' R . L.
`Schlossm an ,' T, Hideshima,' F. D a v ie s,' R , LeBlanc ,' L. Carley,' 0 , D o ss *,'
`K.A . K e ll y * ,' M . Mc Ke n ney* ,' J . Mec h low icz*,' A . Fre eman * ,' R .
`Deoca m po *,' R . R ic h * ,' 1. R yo o *,' D . C hau han ,' N. Mun shi,' E . Weller*,'
`S. Thomas",' J . Zeldis,' K .C. A n derso n . '
`' Dana-Farber Cancer Institut e,
`Boston. MA. USA; ' Celgene Inc.. Warren. NJ. USA.
`Intr odu ction : Thalidomide (thai) has a broad spectrum ofbiologic effects and signi fican t
`clinical activity against multip le myeloma (M M). CC-50 13,a small molecule derivative of
`thai and a member of the immu nom od ulatory drug (IMiD) clas s, is more potent than thai in
`mediating direct , cytokine-re lated and imm unomo dulatory effec ts agai nst hum an MM ce ll
`linesand patient (pt) derived ce lls in vitro . Anima l studies ofCC-50 13 have shown anti(cid:173)
`MM activity and anti-a ngiogenic effects, wit h minimal toxicity. Moreover, th is age nt has
`a favorable safety profile in norm al hum an voluntee rs. Methods: A phase I study has been
`performed in pts with refractory or relapsed MM to identify the maximum tolerated dose and
`to evaluate the safety of CC- 50 13 given orally for up to 4 weeks at 5 mg/d ay (d), 10 mg/d,
`25 mg/d and 50 mg/d . Seco nda ry objectives inclu ded evaluation of respon se to CC-50 13,
`as well as pharm acok ineti cs and identification of surroga te markers to aid in defi ning
`to
`mechanism s of action. Pts tolerating dru g and with out pro gression were pe rm itted
`continue on therapy beyond 28d as part of an extension phase for up to I year. Results: 26
`pts (median age 57y, range 40-70y) have been enrolled; 16 had undergone prior autologo us
`stemcell
`tra nsplanta tion and 16 had received prior thai, with a median of 3 prior regimens
`(range 2-6). All pts had relapsed MM and 18 were refractory to salvage therap y. 2 pts were
`removed from study on the first day oftreattnent due to rapid disease prog ressio n with renal
`dysfunction that rendered them inel igible . The first gro up of 3 pts were treate d for 28 d at
`5 mg/d without any dose limit ing toxicity (DLT). The second cohort of 3 pts co mmenced
`therapy at 10 mg/d .
`In I pt, DLT was encou ntered wit h gra de (G) 2 fever as we ll as G3
`leukopenia and neutropenia, resulti ng in removal from study befo re d 28 . 2 pts tolerated
`drug and 3 additional pts were treated at 10 mg/d wit h no attributable toxicity within the
`first28d. In the third cohort of3 pts at 25mg/d, drug was well tolerated within the first 28d
`but G3 and G4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occ urred during the seco nd month,
`resulting in 2 pts being removed from study. In the fourth cohort at 50mg/d, the first 3 pts
`tolerated treattnent without DLT in the first 28d, but subsequent G3 mye losuppression in
`the extension phase prompted dose red uction and GCSF support. To date, a further 8 pts
`have been treated at 50m g/d to bette r defi ne
`toxicity and o utcome. No DLT has been
`encountered within the first 28d, and no significant som nolence, constipation or neuropathy
`hasbeen seen in any cohort. Median duration oftherapy is cu rrently 2 mont hs [range I wee k
`- 9 months] and 16 pts continue on trea ttne nt. Maximal para protei n reductio ns see n during
`therapy in pts who have received ~ 28d of treatm ent are summarized below :
`< 25% ~2 5 %<5 0% ~ O%
`Dose[mg]
`pis [n]
`progression
`5
`3
`2
`1
`10
`5
`1
`2
`lS
`3
`3
`W
`8
`(4)
`(5)
`(7)
`(3)
`(subtotals)
`( 19)
`Best responses in paraprotei n with a red uction of z 25% have been seen in 12 of 19
`
`4
`
`775a
`
`eval uable pts (63%) and <25% in an additional 3 pts, C oncl us ion: This study shows that
`CC-50 13 has anti-tumo r activity and acc eptable toxicity in pts with relapsed and refractory
`MM, and provi des the framework for futu re phase II trials in MM .
`
`Ab stract# 3226
`
`Result s of Phase I Study of CC-5013 for the Treatment of Multipl e
`M y eloma
`( M M ) Patient s Who
`R elap s e
`after H i gh D o s e
`Chemotherapy ( H D C T). M aurizio Z angari,' G ui d o Tricot ,' Jerome Zeldis,'
`I My elom a and
`P au l E d d le mon*,' Fari b a S aghafi fa r* ,' B a r t B arl o gi e. '
`Transplanta tio n Research Center, University of A rka nsas for Medical
`Scie nces . Little Rock, AR, USA; ' Celgene. Warren. NJ. USA.
`Despite the 40%-50 complete respon se rate and increased surv iva l achieved by high
`dose chemot hera py, there is a clea r need to further improve trea tment outco me in MM . We
`dose, phas e I-study of the
`report results from a sing le center, open label , escalating
`thalidom ide derivative CC -501 3. Four different dai ly dose leve ls (5/ 10/25 /50 mg) we re
`tested. All patient s were treated for four weeks. In the absen ce of dose-lim iting toxicity
`(DLn or evidence of disease progression (PD), patients could be ente red on an ex tension
`study, which allowed furth er dose esca lations. Th e maximum dose allowed in this study
`If at any level one of the first 3 patients ex perie nced DLT, the co hort was
`was 50 mg/d ay.
`ex panded to 6 patient s; if 2 patient s experienced DTL in the sa me co hort, no furthe r dose
`escalation was allowed. Fiftee n patients were enro lled; 6 were ma les . Med ian age was 62
`yea rs (43-7 3); med ian 13-2 micro glob ulin was 2.6 mg/l (1.4-6.4), median CRP 0.24 mg/I (.09
`to 3.7). Ten had chromosome 13 abnorma lities on cyt oge netic anal ysis. All pat ients had
`chem orefra ctory diseas e having relapsed after at least one HDCT (ran ge I to 3) with a
`median of 10 prior cycles of chem otherap y (range 3 to 80). No responses were see n at the
`5 and 10 mg level. However, 2 of the 3 patients, who started at 10 mg and were subse quently
`esca lated on the extension study to 25 and 50 mg, res pec tive ly, achieved a > 50% parap rotein
`response with a decrease in BM plasmacytosis of 50% in one patient, while the other
`co ntinued to show < 5% bone marrow plasm a ce lls. One patient at the 25 mg level had stable
`paraprotein and bone marrow pla smacytosis for 5 month s, while discont inuation of therapy
`was requ ired in 2 patients (one synco pe; one PO ). Six patients started at 50 mg/ day; 3 are '
`sti ll on study, one with stable, one with > 25% and one with> 50 % in both para pro tein level
`and bon e ma rrow plasm acyto sis; 2 patient s ex pe rie nced DLT (thro mboe mbolism an d
`profo und thro mbocytopenia) and one PD. Six patients con tinue on this study after 2, 2, 4,
`5,6 and 6 months, five at 50 mg/d ay and one at 25 mg/day dose. Five of these patients have
`experienced a > 50% drop in platelet cou nt. The initial platelet co unt in these 5 patient s was
`> 140,000/).11 and their bo ne marrow bio psy cellularity > 30%. We co nclu de that 20% of
`these heavily pret reated M M patient s showed a > 50 % paraprotein reduction wi th a
`concomitant bone marrow response . Responses were only observed at the 25 and 50 mg
`dose . Ho w e ve r,
`the
`th al id om ide de r iva tive appears to a lso cause significant
`myelosuppr ession even in pat ients with adequate pla te let co unts and bone marrow
`cellularity before the start of treatm en t. It also has the potential
`to cause cardiovascular
`problems such as throm boe mbol ism and syncope. Neuro logic toxicity is minimal.
`
`A bs t r a c t# 3227
`
`Single Subcutaneous Dose of an O steoprotegerin (OP G )
`A
`a Profound and S us t a i ne d
`Con struct
`(A M GN- 0 0 0 7)
`C a u s e s
`D ecrease of Bone Resorption Comparable to S t a n d a r d
`Intravenou s
`Bispho sphonate in Patients with Multiple M yeloma. P. Greipp. ' T .
`Facon,' C. D . Will ia ms, ' A . L ip to n ,' X . M ariette * ,' J .-P. Ferrn and ," J .
`Ber enson ," J .- L. Harou sseau. ! R . A lexan ian ," A . N akani s hi *, '0 D .
`Holl oway" ;" C. R . Dunstan * , '0 P.1 . B e kker* . 10 I Mayo Clinic, Rochester,
`MN; lCH U de Lille, Lille, France; ' Christie Hosp ital. Manchester, United
`Kingdom; ' Hershey Medical Center, Hershey. PA; ' CH U de Bicetre, Paris,
`France; "Hop ital Sa int-Lo uis, Paris, France; ' Cedars Sinai Med Ctr; Los
`Angeles. CA.' "Hop ital Hotel Dieu, Nantes. France; 9MD Anderson Med Ctr;
`Houston, TX ; /OAmgen Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA.
`Bone destruction causes significant morbidity in most patients with multiple myeloma
`(MM). Cytokines released during bone destruction prom ote myelom a cell proliferation and
`survival. OPG is a potent inhibitor of osteoc lastic bone destruction . A randomize d, double(cid:173)
`blind, do uble-dummy, ac tive-co ntro lled, sing le-dose, dose escalation stu dy is bei ng
`co nducted to determ ine the safe ty and effec t on bo ne resorption of AMGN-0007 in MM
`patients wit h radio log ica l co nfirmed lytic bon e lesion s. Patients were rando mize d (3 : I
`ratio) to receive a sing le dose of either AMGN-0007 SC or pamidronate (PAM ; 90 mg IV)
`and were followe d for 57 days. Medica tions or ot her diseases affecti ng bo ne metabolism
`and chemo therapy within 28 days of dosing were excl usio n criteria. Biological activity of
`AMGN-0007 was assessed by measureme nt of the surrogate ma rker of bo ne resorption,
`urinary N-telopeptide of collagen (NTX). Preliminary data indicate that SC AMGN-0007
`caused a rapi d, sustained dose-depend ent decrease in NTX/creatinine levels (nmol Bone
`Collagen Equivalents/m mol creat inine) . No patients dropped out due to adverse events.
`Two patients in the 1.0 mg/kg AMGN-0007 group had albumin-adjusted serum calcium
`In conclusion, a
`levels of7.4 and 7.5 mg/dL at day 8, but there were no clinical seq uelae.
`sing le SC dose of AMGN-0007 su pp ressed bone resorption as indicated by a rapid,
`sustai ned, and profound decr ease ofurinary NTX/creatinine in MM patie nts. Changes were
`co mparab le to those with PAM. AMGN-0007 was well to lerate d.
`UnDan NIX/Creati nine levels aft er AMGN -Q007 or PAM
`Study Drug
`AMG N-0007
`SC (mglkg)
`0.1 (0=3)
`0.3 (o~)
`1.0 (0- 7)
`3.0 (0=6)
`PAM 90 mg
`I V (0=6)
`
`Per cent Change from Baseline NTX ; Mean (Scj
`Day 1
`Day 8
`Day 29
`-11.7 (20.2)
`-20.5 (20.3)
`-2.8 (6.4)
`-28.6 (5.3)
`-53.7 (11.9)
`-44.8 (9.9)
`-37.9 (14.2)
`-56.\ (7.0)
`-58.8 (6.6)
`-32.5 ( 12.6)
`-46.4 (14.7)
`-34.7 (16.9)
`·36 .9 (5.7)
`-53.9 (8.4)
`-32.4 (9.7)
`
`Baseline NI X; Mean (SDj
`Day 0
`46.3 (33.1)
`27.3 (16.2)
`27.8 ( 11.7)
`27.8 (17.2)
`24.8 ( 11.3)
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1075 PAGE 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket