throbber
PAGE 26 / APRIL 2001
`
`O
`
` T
`
`Thalidomide-Combo Trials Vary Widely
`
`Joe Vericker/Photobureau
`
`William D. Figg, PharmD,
`said thalidomide probably
`won’t “hit any home runs”
`by itself in prostate cancer
`treatment, but it may be
`useful in combination with
`cytostatic or cytotoxic drugs.
`
`affect PSA, he said. For example, the
`angiogenesis inhibitor TNP470 both
`upregulates and dowregulates, and
`when prostate cancer patients took the
`drug CAI (carboxyamido-triazole), a
`downregulator, PSA levels declined
`even while the patients’ tumor size on
`computed tomography scan was still
`rising.
`Dr. Figg said thalidomide probably
`won’t “hit any home runs” by itself in
`prostate cancer treatment, but it may be
`useful in combination with cytostatic or
`cytotoxic drugs.
`At the NCI, a Phase II trial of doc-
`etaxel with or without weekly thalido-
`mide in androgen-independent disease
`is almost fully accrued, Dr. Figg noted.
`(continued on page 28)
`
`bisphosphonate pamidronate, he noted.
`“We hope to see a lower incidence of
`secondary leukemia in the thalidomide
`arm, which is a problem in myeloma
`therapy.”
`
`Prostate Cancer Responds
`
`A single-agent open-label trial of
`thalidomide at the National Cancer
`Institute of prostate cancer patients
`found declines in prostate-specifc anti-
`gen (PSA) levels in 68 percent of 63
`androgen-independent patients taking
`a high-dose regimen, and in 58 percent
`of men taking low-dose thalidomide,
`reported William D. Figg, PharmD,
`Senior Investigator and Head of NCI’s
`Clinical Pharmacokinetic Section.
`Low dose was 200 mg/day, and
`high dose escalated from 200 to 1,200
`mg/day. Four patients taking low-dose
`thalidomide maintained depressed PSA
`levels for more than 150 days, and two
`of them were considered partial re-
`sponders by bone scan criteria.
`None of the high-dose patients,
`however, had more than a 50% PSA
`response, Dr. Figg noted. “That was
`probably because few patients tolerated
`the high doses, and most had to come
`off trial.” But he added that colleagues
`at the NCI treating Kaposi’s sarcoma
`are using high-dose thalidomide with-
`out the same toxicities—probably
`because the population of patients is
`younger than in advanced prostate can-
`cer trials.
`Dr. Figg pointed out that using
`changes in PSA as a marker probably
`underestimated thalidomide’s actual
`effect on reducing prostate tumors,
`because thalidomide upregulates PSA
`by about 20 percent. Other drugs also
`
`Joe Vericker/Photobureau
`
`Bart Barlogie, MD, PhD,
`said he believes thalidomide
`is an ideal agent to combine
`with myelosuppressive
`cytotoxic drugs, since it is
`minimally bone-marrow
`suppressive.
`
`induction chemotherapy alone or with
`thalidomide.
`The “total therapy” regimen begins
`with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dex-
`amethasone (VAD); followed by dex-
`amethasone, cyclophosphamide, etopo-
`side, and cisplatin (DCEP); then cyclo-
`phosphamide, doxorubicin, and dex-
`amethasone; stem cell transplant; and
`then another cycle of DCEP. A second
`phase consists of two cycles of high-
`dose melphalan.
`Patients are randomized to receive
`or not receive thalidomide throughout
`the year-long program, Dr. Barlogie
`said.
`In a trial planned at his center for
`early indolent (smoldering) myeloma,
`thalidomide will be combined with the
`
`By Robert H. Carlson
`
`N EW YORK CITY—Thalidomide
`
`as an anticancer agent will like-
`ly be best used in combination
`with other drugs, and the selec-
`tion of companion agents being tested
`varies widely. That was the conclusion
`of researchers presenting results here at
`the most recent Chemotherapy Foun-
`dation Symposium and in follow-up
`phone calls at the end of February.
`Combinations with cytotoxic che-
`motherapy agents, steroids, antibiotics,
`and even a bisphosphonate are all
`being tested.
`
`‘Total Therapy’ Includes
`Thalidomide
`
`Thalidomide is an angiogenesis inhi-
`bitor, and its activity as a single agent
`in refractory multiple myeloma was
`confirmed in a report by Bart Barlogie,
`MD, PhD, Director of the Arkansas
`Cancer Research Center in Little Rock.
`He described a trial of 169 patients in
`which 61 responded, including three
`with complete responses, and 20 others
`with regressions of greater than 90 per-
`cent. The overall survival rate with sin-
`gle-agent thalidomide was 55 percent at
`18 months.
`Dr. Barlogie said he believes
`thalidomide is an ideal agent to com-
`bine with myelosuppressive cytotoxic
`drugs, since it is minimally bone-mar-
`row suppressive.
`In an interview after the meeting,
`Dr. Barlogie said a randomized multi-
`ple myeloma trial referred to as “Total
`Therapy II” has already randomized
`more than 300 newly diagnosed multi-
`ple myeloma patients to intensive
`
`Hodgkin’s Disease
`continued from page 25
`
`also to remember that problems can
`arise with relapse. In the case of a male
`who receives initial treatment that is
`nonsterilizing, he may relapse and
`require high-dose treatment. Spermato-
`genesis may have lulled, and there may
`be no further opportunity before steril-
`ization to harvest semen for cryopreser-
`vation. Thus, alternative options have
`to be considered. “Unfortunately,
`because of the evolving nature of proto-
`cols, we are on a moving staircase in
`terms of fertility treatment and progno-
`sis,” Dr. Gosden continued. “It is very
`difficult, in any particular set of circum-
`stances, to predict exactly what the
`effects will be upon a young man or
`woman’s future fertility.”
`
`Act Before Treatment Starts
`
`Therefore, to conserve fertility, it is
`important to act before treatment com-
`
`mences, Dr. Gosden said. In general,
`the options for women are more limited
`than for men. To preserve the possibili-
`ty of a woman’s future genetic parent-
`hood, there is the possibility of embryo,
`oocyte, or ovary banking. One method
`of in vivo protection of the ovaries is to
`perform oophoropexy, in which the
`ovaries are transposed and then
`returned to their original site following
`completion of treatment. There have
`been successes using this approach
`when abdominal radiation treatments
`are required. However, natural fertility
`may not always return after this proce-
`dure.
`Several theoretical approaches are
`now being contemplated. For instance,
`one strategy may be to use oral contra-
`ceptives and gonadotropin-releasing
`hormone agonists in both males and
`females to suppress the gonads and
`thus reduce their radio- or chemo-sensi-
`tivity. However, support for this theory
`is based mostly on animal studies.
`Other theories deal with inventing tar-
`get agents to inhibit apoptotic path-
`
`ways, specifically in oocytes.
`fertile men sometimes cannot produce
`This raises the concern that such
`specimens under the stress of a cancer
`agents would also reduce therapeutic
`diagnosis, or may produce specimens
`benefit. Another concern, said Dr.
`with low sperm counts due to other
`Gosden, is that this technique might
`disease-associated effects.
`conserve germ cells that should have
`Intracytoplasmic sperm injection
`otherwise undergone apoptosis. They
`has revolutionized the treatment of
`may have acquired germ line damage,
`infertility, because only one sperm is
`leading to effects on later reproduction
`needed for fertilization of the partner’s
`such as miscarriage or birth defects.
`egg. And, sperm can be collected either
`One exciting new technology is the
`from ejaculate or from a testicular biop-
`storing of ovarian tissue, either as an
`sy. Another possibility on the horizon
`ovarian biopsy to be cryobanked for
`for men is the preservation of intact
`future transplantation or by recovering
`seminiferous tubules for later trans-
`primordial follicles and maturing them
`plantation. Storage of ovarian or testic-
`in the laboratory for use in in vitro pro-
`ular tissue might also be applied in the
`cedures. Although the latter technology
`future to prepubertal patients, “bring-
`is still a “very long way” from reality,
`ing them into the range of fertility con-
`Dr. Gosden has participated in experi-
`servation for the first time,” he said.
`ments in which autografts of ovarian
`In the meantime, Dr. Gosden urged
`tissue restored estrus cycles in female
`his audience to become aware of the
`sheep.
`problems of infertility and the trauma
`While cryopreservation of semen is
`that is caused in patients as they
`generally accepted as the standard for
`become aware of treatment implica-
`fertility conservation in men, it is not
`tions. A multidisciplinary approach is
`without its fallibilities. The procedure
`important, as is timing, in choosing the
`cannot be used for preadolescents, and
`right procedure for patients.
`O
`T
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1057 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`Rangaswamy Govindarajan,
`MD, noted that patients
`treated with irinotecan
`often have Grade 3/4
`diarrhea, which can be
`prolonged and even
`require hospitalization. To
`date there have been no
`such problems in patients
`in a small study who
`have received combined
`irinotecan and thalidomide.
`
`Joe Vericker/Photobureau
`
`his group, called MW16 or CPS16, caus-
`es complete shutdown of vessel growth
`in vitro and is in preclinical trial.
`Another analog, Celgene’s CC5013, is
`in Phase I clinical trials at Dana-Farber
`Cancer Center in Boston. Entremed’s
`thalidomide analog 2-methoxyestradiol
`(2ME) is also in Phase I trial.
`“We are still looking for a thalido-
`mide analog that is more potent, with
`less toxicity,” he said. He speculated
`that angiogenesis inhibitors may find
`their widest use in combination with
`surgery, radiation therapy, or chemo-
`therapy and in patients with minimal
`tumor burden, when there is the most
`recruitment of blood vessels.
`
`The thalidomide-irinotecan combi-
`nation has gotten some notice in treat-
`ment of advanced colon cancer—not for
`response rates greater than with irinote-
`can alone, but because patients had an
`unexpected reduction in severe gas-
`trointestinal side effects usually seen
`with irinotecan.
`Rangaswamy Govindarajan, MD,
`Assistant Professor of Medicine at the
`University of Arkansas for Medical
`Sciences, reported on a trial with 11
`evaluable patients. The irinotecan dose
`was 350 mg/m2 intravenously every
`three weeks, which Dr. Govindarajan
`said is a schedule used in Europe. He
`said the literature shows this is compa-
`
`PAGE 28 / APRIL 2001
`
`O
`
` T
`
`Thalidomide
`continued from page 26
`
`Activity is being seen in both arms, he
`said, and no unexpected side effects
`have emerged.
`Another NCI Phase II trial is test-
`ing intermittent hormonal ablation with
`or without angiogenesis inhibition.
`Patients receiving six months of leupro-
`lide after irradiation and radical prosta-
`tectomy are randomized to receive
`either thalidomide or placebo.
`Dr. Figg noted that investigators
`are also testing more potent analogs of
`thalidomide. One product patented by
`
`rable in toxicity and response rate to
`the familiar North America schedule of
`125 mg/m2 weekly. The thalidomide
`dose was 400 mg/day.
`Patients had significant reductions
`in Grade 3/4 nausea, vomiting, diar-
`rhea, and abdominal pain as compared
`with irinotecan alone, he noted. “The
`protocol was not written to reduce toxi-
`city, but that was an observation seen
`in all patients.”
`Irinotecan is a very difficult drug to
`give, he added, and about 30 percent of
`patients will have Grade 3/4 diarrhea
`and require hospitalization, which can
`be prolonged for two to three weeks.
`“But we are not seeing any Grade 3/4
`diarrhea in patients who receive irino-
`tecan and thalidomide,” Dr. Govin-
`darajan said.
`
`Thalidomide
`combinations with
`cytotoxic chemotherapy
`agents, steroids,
`antibiotics, and even a
`bisphosphonate
`are all being tested.
`
`The reason for the apparent protec-
`tive effect is unknown. Possible mecha-
`nisms include thalidomide suppression
`of TNF-alpha, some effect on T-helper-
`type-2 cell immune function, or sup-
`pression of cyclooxygenase.
`This trial of 11 patients saw two
`with partial responses and four with
`stable disease. Dr. Govindarajan said
`the response rate was comparable to
`that of irinotecan alone. A prior pilot
`study produced superior results with
`the combination, however, including
`three complete responses in 11 patients,
`“so we don’t know what to make of
`that,” he said.
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1057 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`O
`
` T
`
`PAGE 29 / APRIL 2001
`
`unheard of with any other therapy.”
`The addition of glucocorticos-
`teroids allows the use of lower thalido-
`mide doses, for potentially fewer side
`effects, he noted.
`He said his center is now develop-
`ing a program for myeloma using
`thalidomide with the antibiotics clar-
`ithromycin, which appears to greatly
`potentiate responses in patients resis-
`tant to steroids and thalidomide.
`
`No Help in AML
`
`In the one negative thalidomide trial
`reported at the Symposium, the antian-
`giogenic drug did not improve re-
`
`sponse rates of Ara-C and liposomal
`daunorubicin in patients with poor-
`prognosis refractory acute myeloid
`leukemia (AML).
`Jorge Cortes, MD, Associate Pro-
`fessor at the University of Texas MD
`Anderson Cancer Center in Houston,
`described a trial in which 38 patients
`were randomized to liposomal dauno-
`rubicin at 100 mg/m2/day on Days 1-3,
`and Ara-C at 1 gm/m2/day on Days 1-
`4, while 36 others received that regimen
`plus thalidomide, starting at 400
`mg/week and escalating to 600 mg/
`week.
`The early complete response rate
`was approximately the same for both
`
`groups, Dr. Cortes said—about 50 per-
`cent with or without thalidomide.
`Patients who did not respond tended to
`have higher pretreatment vascular
`endothelial growth factor (VEGF) lev-
`els. This suggests that VEGF may be
`mediated through mechanisms other
`than angiogenesis, Dr. Cortes ex-
`plained.
`Patients are being followed to
`determine whether thalidomide affects
`duration of response. “In view of the
`significance of VEGF in the prognosis
`of these patients, further studies are
`warranted using more potent VEGF or
`angiogenesis inhibitors,” he conclud-
`ed.
`O
`T
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1057 PAGE 3
`
`Joe Vericker/Photobureau
`
`James Berenson, MD: “We
`treated patients with
`amyloidosis who failed
`other treatments, and most
`responded rather
`dramatically to thalidomide
`or thalidomide and steroids.
`These were patients who
`had extensive disease,
`especially kidney-based but
`also GI-based disease, as
`well as macroglossia.”
`
`Macroglossia Responds to
`Thalidomide & Steroids
`
`At Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los
`Angeles, five of six patients with prima-
`ry amyloidosis and renal organ in-
`volvement responded to thalidomide
`and a thalidomide-glucocorticosteroid
`combination, reported James Berenson,
`MD, Director of the Multiple Myeloma
`and Bone Metastases Program.
`“We treated patients with amyloid
`who failed other treatments, and most
`responded rather dramatically to the
`thalidomide or thalidomide and ster-
`oids,” he said. “These were patients
`who had extensive disease, especially
`kidney-based but also GI-based disease,
`as well as macroglossia.” Four patients
`had improved renal involvement, and
`four had what Dr. Berenson termed
`dramatic improvements in quality of
`life. “It was also quite impressive to
`see improvement in albumin levels,
`which almost returned to normal with
`the addition of low-dose thalido-
`mide,” he said. “That is pretty much
`
`Jorge Cortes, MD: “In view
`of the significance of VEGF
`in the prognosis of these
`patients, further studies are
`warranted using more
`potent VEGF or angiogenesis
`inhibitors.”
`
`Joe Vericker/Photobureau
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket