throbber
California
`
`_ American Society
`I ~ - 1
`of Hematology
`0
`~ ~ It
`I 0
`
`JOURNAL OF
`
`THE AMERSCAN
`
`SOCSETY OF
`
`HEMATOLOGY
`
`VOLUME 96
`
`. NUMBER 11
`
`OVEMBER16, 2000
`
`ART 2 OF 2 PARTS
`i
`
`5
`
`fl
`
`aa0Q99to..gflxnfinfiwwg
`
`~ ~ O,l g
`
`~
`
`Forty-second
`a ~ I l~ I
`~ ~ 1 ~
`annual meeting
`
`‘1
`
`
`
`Kill
`becember 1-5, 2000
`~ = ~ =
`
`San Francisco,
`] ~
`~ ~
`
`(
`
`~
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1054 PAGE 1
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1054 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`286b
`
`4976
`Abstract¹
`CLINICAL EFFICACY OF IRRADIATION IN CLL PATIENTS:
`PREDICTIVE VALUE OF IN VITRO RADIO-INDUCED
`APOPTOSIS. D Decaudin, J. Delic*, J. Dumont", E. Blot*, G. Tertian*,
`B. Dubray*, C. Grandpeix*,
`J.M. Cossets. Department of Hematology,
`Laboratory of Radiopathology;
`Department of Radiotherapy,
`Instltut
`Curie, Paris; Department
`of Hematology, Hopital du Kremlin-Bicetre,
`Le Kremlin-Bzcetre, France.
`irradiation of CLL patients,
`in case of bulky
`formerly indicated as palhative
`treatment
`disease or hypersplenism,
`has been introduced since few years into myeloablative
`regimens.
`ln order to discrimmate patients for whom such treatment could be beneficial, we investigated
`apoptosis of leukemic cells and response to
`the rclationslup
`between in vitro tadio-induced
`low-dose splenic or lymph node radiotherapy.
`Fourteen patients with CLL and receiving
`low-dose irraihation were included m thein vitro study The median time from diagnosis
`to
`(range 5-156) Three patients were Binet Stage B and eleven
`radiotherapy was 60 months
`patients were Bmet stage C The median blood lymphocyte
`count pnor to irradiation was
`126 10'/1 (range 10-268). Irradiation was the first-hne therapy in three cases, the second in
`seven cases, and the third m four cases Ten and five patients
`received splenic and tumor
`respectively, while one of them had received previous
`site irradiation,
`for a
`radiotherapy
`nasal site, followed by splenic irradiation 2 years later. Doses of radiotherapy
`ranged from
`1 to 5 Gy Leukemic cells were analysed immediately
`after collection or 24 hours of culture
`following in vitro irradiation of 0 to 10Gy. Afler Hoechst staining,
`the proportion of apoptotic
`as the percent of cells presenting
`cells was determined
`by fluorescence microscopy
`for a total number of 10'. The tumor
`charactenstics of apoptosis,
`morphological
`response
`rate was 47% with one complete remission and six partial remissions,
`three of which greater
`than 90% Excluding the patient
`receivmg nasal
`irradiation without
`local recurrence,
`the
`mean duration of response was 3 months
`(range 1-4). For the ten patients
`receiving splenic
`the tumor response rate was 40% with a mean percentage of decrease leukemic
`irradiation,
`cells of 50%, 89 and 24% for responding
`(p & 0.05).
`and refractory patients,
`respectively
`The in vitro study showed a proportion of apoptotic leukemic cells ranged between 2 and
`75%. We observed a high correlation
`between tumor
`response
`and in vitro tests (p &
`0.01)(Mann-Whitney U test). After splemc uradiation, we also found a high correlation
`between the percentage decrease of leukenuc cells and m vitro radio-induced
`apoptosis (r =
`0.87, p & 0.01, Spearman correlation test). The positive predictive value (PPV) of the m
`response was 100% at 2 Gy The PPV of the in vitro tests for
`vitro tests for tumor
`response was 75% at 2 Gy and 100% at 5 Gy. In tlus report, we observed a
`hematological
`apoptosis of leukemic cells and clinical and
`lugh correlation between in vitro radio-induced
`that the sensitivity of leukemic
`hematological
`response to radiotherapy. These results suggest
`cells to irradiation
`should be first evaluated in an in vitro assay to spare refractory patients
`from the useless toxicity of TBI
`
`4977
`Abstract¹
`TREATMENT OF WALDENSTROM'S MACROGLOBULINEMIA
`WITH THALIDOMIDE. M,A. Dirnopoulos, N. Viniou*, A. Zomas", V.
`E. Galani*, C. Matsouka*, O. Economou*, N.
`Grhgoraki"',
`P. Panayiotides*. School of Medicine, University of
`Anagnostopoulos",
`Athens, Athens, Greece.
`Thahdomide
`is an active agent
`in patients with refractory multiple myeloma. Based on
`these data we performed a phase 11 study m order to evaluate the activity of thalidomide
`in
`Waldenstrom's macroglobuhnemia
`(WM) Thalidomide was administered
`on a dose-
`escalating schedule of 200 mg daily p o x 14 days with dose escalation by 200 mg every
`two weeks to a maximum dose of 600 mg. Twenty patients were treated with a median age
`of 74 years
`(range 48 to 85 years) Hemoglobin was & 10.0 gr/dl
`in 5 patients,
`serum
`lgM was &3.0 gr m 9 patients
`monoclonal
`and lymphadenopathy
`and splenomegaly were
`in 7 and 10 patients
`present
`respectively. Ten patients were previously
`untreated,
`1 was
`relapsing off treatment,
`5 were pnmary
`refractory and 4 were treated dunng refractory
`(25%) achieved at least 50% reduction of serum monoclonal
`relapse. Five patients
`IgM and
`at least 50% reduction of tumor at all involved sites. At least 25% reduction of IgM was
`responders witlun 4 weeks of thahdomide
`noted in all eventual
`ueatment. Responses occuned
`in 3 of 10 previoulsy
`untreated patients and in 2 of 10 preheated patients. One responding
`patient with artial fibrillation died of an embolic cerebral accident 4 months after achieving
`a response and the other responding
`remain without progression for 2+ months
`patients
`to
`12 + months Some degree of toxicity was observed m almost all patients. Grade 2 or 3
`toxicities included constipation m 6 patients,
`somnolence in 3 patients,
`tremor in 2 patients
`in 2 patients This explained the inability
`to reach the targeted dose of
`and neuropathy
`thalidomide 600 mg p.o QD in all but 4 patients,
`the median darly dose of this agent was
`200 mg We conclude that
`activity in WM. A relatively
`thalidonude
`has moderate
`low
`median dady dose could be adinuustered
`to this elderly patient population.
`
`4978
`Abstract¹
`THALIDOMIDE AND DEXAMETHASONE COMBINATION FOR
`MULTIPLE MYLEOMA REFRACTORY TO DEXAMETHASONE-
`BASED REGIMENS. M.A. Dimopoulos, K. Zervas*, E. Galani", V.
`Grigoraki", E. Vervessou*, E. Samantas"', C. Kiamouris", D. Ghka*, C.
`Papadimitrhou*, N. Anagnostopoulos*.
`School of Medicine, University of
`Athens, Athens, Greece.
`Recent data suggest
`30% of patients
`is active in approximately
`thahdomide
`that
`(pts)
`with refractory multiple myeloma. Between 7/99 and 7/00 we treated 38 pts with refractory
`200 mg PO q h s, increased to 400 mg after two weeks (in
`myeloma with thalidomide
`absence of severe side effects), and mtennhttent
`dexamethasone 40 mg p o. x 4 days on days
`1-4, 9-12, 17-20 followed by monthly
`(days 1-4). Pts median age was 67
`dexamethasone
`
`MYELOMA/CLL - THERAPY, EXCLUDING TRANSPLANTATION
`(49 to 79 years)
`years
`Immediately
`has consisted of lugh-dose
`prior
`therapy
`pals
`(21 pts) or VAD (17pts). Twelve pts had previously
`dexamethasone
`received an autoiogpI
`stem cell transplant Fo~een pts were considered as prlinary
`refractory slid 24 pts were
`treated dunng reftactory relapse. Serum b2-microglobulin & 3 0 mg/dl was present
`in 66',
`of pts and elevated serum LDH hn 26% Among the 33 patients evaluable
`for iesponse s
`far, 17 (52%) have achieved a partial
`response defined by reductions & 50% of sera&
`monoclonal protein and/or by &75% of unne monoclonal piotein The time to response wss
`short (median: 1.5months,
`range 0.5 to 3 months). Side effects included constipauon (75%)
`(54%), tremor
`somnolence
`(25%), dry slunhash
`(18%), headache
`morning
`(14%) asd
`(7%).Our results indicate activity of the combmation of tha)hdonuhte
`peripheral neuropathy
`with dexamethasone
`in pts with multiple myeloma
`refractory to dexamethasone-based
`regimens. Pts accrual and follow up is ongoing in order.
`to dcfme the activity of thjs
`and to assess the duration of response
`combination in pts'subsets
`
`4979
`Abstract¹
`THE ROLE OF BISPHOSPHONATES IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA.
`META-ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED RANDOMIZED TRIALS. II
`Djulbegovic,'. Wheatley",'. Lacevic",'. Bos,'
`Ross*," IJ
`Goldschmidt,'. Glasmacher.'Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation
`H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Univ. of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
`'Clinical Trials Unit, Univ. of Birmingham,
`'Dpt, pf
`United Kingdom;
`Internal Medicine, Univ. Hospital, Maastricht, The Netlzerlands;
`Dpt. pf
`Haematology, Northampton General Hospital, United Kingdom;
`'Dpt, pf
`Internal Medicine V, Univ. of Heidelberg, Germany;
`'Dpt. of Intern/hi
`Medicine I, Univ. of Bonn, Germany.
`used in the management of multiple myelohna
`(Bs) are mcreasingly
`Bisphosphonates
`(MM). AIM; To synthesize
`about benefits and harms of Bs in Mih(
`aviulable knowledge
`(MA) of available published
`we performed meta-analysis
`evidence METHODS: We
`identified 10 randomized,
`placebo controlled trials (RCTs), of which 9 tnals setved as a
`basis for this analysis
`(Bs. etidronate 2 trials, clodronate 4, pamidronate 2, ibandronate
`1),
`trial was excluded from the analysis. A total of 1058 patients
`A small cross-over
`treated
`with Bs and 1017patients with placebo were included in analysis Heterogeneity
`among the
`thus allowmg poolmg pf .
`for the major outcomes considered in analysis,
`was imnimal
`data in this MA. RESULTS: The published evidence demonstrated
`a beneficial effect ofBs,
`on prevention of pathological
`fractures. On average for every 8 patients
`vertebral
`treated:,
`with Bs one patient will avoid a vertebral
`fracture dunng median foflow-up of 22 5 months
`4 to 24 months, OR=0.53, 95%CI 0.39-0.72,P=0.00005). There was no significant
`effect of Bs on non-vertebral
`fractures (OR=0.99, 95%CI 0.69-1.40,p=0.9).There was also,'
`beneficial effect of Bs on bone pain with absolute risk reduction of 14% (95%CI ranges
`from 8%-19%),indicating that on average for every 7 patients
`treated with Bs one patierit
`will not experience pain. We found no significant effect of Bs on hypercalcemia
`(OR=0.84,
`95%CI:0.6-1.16,P=0.3].Administration of Bs was associated with non-significant mcrease,
`of gastro-intestinal
`side (GI) effects (OR=1.28, 95%CI 0.95-1 74, P=0.11).We found np
`significant effect of Bs on overall mortality in MM (OR=0.97, 95%CI 0.86-1.09) Results
`not change when subgroup analysis according to type of Bs was performed The major
`limitatton of our study is that it has not mcluded unpublished
`data or mdividual-patient
`data.
`CONCLUSIONS: Based on our review of available evidence, Bs reduce the probability of
`vertebral
`and bone pain associated with MM. Further evidence is
`fractures
`needed to determine whether
`some Bs are more effective than others and whether Bs have,
`an effect on mortahty.
`
`'rials
`
`'range
`
`'id
`
`"
`
`.'athological
`
`Enschede,'arameswaran
`
`'
`
`.
`
`'oxicity
`
`4980
`Abstract¹
`A PHASE II STUDY OF FLUDARABINE (F) AND MITOXANTRONE .
`(N) IN THE TREATMENT OF PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED B-CELL
`CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA. Sari H.
`L. Guevarra",'eresa M. O'rien",':
`Venugopal,'gnes
`Stephanie A. Gregory.'Section
`of Hematology, Rush-Presbyterian-St.
`Luke's Medical Center, Chicago,
`IL, USA.
`Fludarabine
`alone is an effective initial mduction
`for CLL patients, with
`therapy
`disease, resulnng in an overall response of 78% (Keathng, Blood 1998).
`progressive/advanced
`Mitoxantrone
`has well documented
`activity m lymphoid malignancies
`and may even act
`such as F The regimen of F, N and
`synergistically with other chemotherapeutic
`agents
`dexamethasone
`is effective for indolent NHL but immunosuppressive
`to the pomt of requiring
`infectious prophylaxis
`/CO 1966).In this study, we assessed the efficacy and
`(McLaughhn,
`of FN as initial
`for CLL patients with stage 11(progressive), 111
`induction treatment
`or IV disease. The median age was 58 (range 47-80) and M F ratio of 2 1 Three patients
`(22%) had stage IH, and 4 pan ents (45%) had stage IV: ',
`had stage 11 disease, 2 patients
`disease patients were treated with the regimen of F 25 mg/mz
`IV on days 1-3 and N 12 nhg/,
`
`m'n day 1 The cycles were repeated every 28 days for a maximum of 6 cycles Stag)ng ':
`
`'33%)
`
`with CT scans and bone marrow studies were performed before and after treatment CR wss
`defined as disappearance of all disease and bone mar/w lymphocytes &30% PR was
`achieved if patients had a &50% reduction in measurable disease. A total of 11 patients we«
`studied. Of the 9 evaluable patients, 4 (44%) achieved CR and 5 (56%) PR with 100% OR
`A total of 4 patients
`(3 CRs and 1 PR) progressed at 7, 10, 20 and 36 months; a median Pf
`months. One patient progressed at 5 months but had received only 2 cycles of treatnient
`A total of 4 patients
`(1 CR and 3 PRs) rehnahn without progression at 8, 9, 25 and 27 months
`The panent at 25 months had stable disease and underwent
`at
`stem cell transplant
`penpheral
`tolerated and the adverse events were comparable «
`20 months. The regimen was well
`those from F alone. There were 3 hospitalizations
`for neutropemc
`fevers and most patients
`had grade 3-4 neutropenia. No antibiotic prophylaxis was required Although
`this was s
`the combination of FN is more efficacious (100% OR)
`phase 11 study,
`it shows
`that
`but not more toxic than F alone in the upfront
`for CLL patients The median thin
`treatment
`
`'5
`
`'mall
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1054 PAGE 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket