throbber
C URRENT OPINION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thalidomide in Cancer
`Poten tial Uses an d Limitation s
`
`Seema Singhal and Jayesh Mehta
`
`Division of Hematology /Oncology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago,
`Illinois, USA
`
`Abstract
`
`In addition to immunomodulatory and cytokine-modulatory properties, tha(cid:173)
`lidomide has antiangiogenic activity. It has been investigated in a number of
`cancers including multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndromes, gliomas,
`Kaposi 's sarcoma, renal cell carcinoma, advanced breast cancer, and colon cancer.
`Its role has been best explored in myeloma, ·where, at daily doses of 100 to 800mg,
`it is remarkably active, causing clinically meaningful responses in one-third of
`exlensively pretreated patients and in over half of patients treated early in the
`course of the disease. It also acts synergistically wilh corticosteroids and chemo(cid:173)
`therapy in myeloma. Thalidomide produces improvement of cytopenias charac(cid:173)
`teristic of myelodysplastic syndrome, resulting in the reduction or elimination of
`transfusion dependence in some patients. Responses have also been seen in one(cid:173)
`third of patients with Kaposi's sarcoma, in a small proportion of patients with
`renal cell carcinoma and high grade glioma and, in combination with irinotecan,
`in some patients with colon cancer. Thalidomide is being investigated currently
`in a number of clinical trials for cancer. Drowsiness, constipation and fatigue are
`common adverse effects seen in 75% of patients. Symptoms of peripheral neu(cid:173)
`ropathy and skin rash are seen in 30%. A minority of patients experience brady(cid:173)
`cardia and thrombotic phenomena. Despite lhe high frequency of adverse effects,
`those severe enough to necessitate cessation of therapy are seen in only 10 to 15%
`of patients. A therapeutic trial of thalidomide should be considered in all patients
`with myeloma who are unresponsive to or relapse after standard therapy. In olher
`malignant diseases, the most appropriate way to use the dmg is in the setting of
`well designed clinical trials. In U1e absence of access to such studies, thalidomide
`could be considered singly or in combination wilh standard therapy in patients
`with no meaningful therapeutic options.
`
`Thalidomide, a synthetic glutamic acid derivative,
`was originally introduc d as a sedative-hypnotic in
`Europe and Canada in the late 1950s. Belated rec(cid:173)
`ognition of s ver teratogenic effects resulted in its
`withdrawal in the early 1960s.Pl Subsequently, tl1e
`
`drug was found to possess diverse immunomodula(cid:173)
`tory and anti-inflanunatory properties,L2-41 which are,
`at least in part, responsible for its activily in erythema
`nodosum leprosuml5l and graft-versus-host disease
`(GVHD).L6J
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1032 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`164
`
`Singha/ & M ehta
`
`The limited early efforts exploring thalidomide
`in cancer were inconclusive. [7.sJ The description of
`its powerful activity in patients with end-stage my(cid:173)
`eloma by Singhal et at.C9l has given rise to investi(cid:173)
`gation of thalidomide in a number of malignant
`disorders. The purpose of this review is to summa(cid:173)
`rise the limited data available on the use of thalid(cid:173)
`omide in cancerP 0-391 and to provide some practical
`guidelines for its use based on our experience.
`
`1. Mechanism of Action
`
`While the exact mechanism of the antimalign(cid:173)
`ancy action of thalidomide is not known, it is likely
`that angiogenesis inhibition, immunomodulation
`and cytokine modulation,140-601 individually or in
`combination, underlie its antitumour activity. The ra(cid:173)
`pid tempo of response in some myeloma patients[91
`suggests that thalidomide may have some direct
`cytotoxic effect on plasma cells. Table I summa(cid:173)
`rises some of the properties of the drug which may
`contribute to its activity in cancer.
`Thalidomide inhibits the production of tumour
`necrosis factor (TNF)-a by monocytes as well as T
`cells. 14o,4i,51.55,56-581 Inhibition of TNF a production
`is not associated with inhibition of other cytokines
`such as interleukin (IL)-2. In fact, thalidomide en(cid:173)
`hances the production of IL -2 ,146·481 which itself
`may possess anti tumour activities or may modulate
`
`Table I. Potential mechanisms of action of tha lidomide in ca nce r
`
`the immune system to induce anticancer activity.
`Data on its effects on interferon (IFN)-y production
`have been variablel45·51 ·55-56l but more reports have
`shown it to increase IFN-y production than to in(cid:173)
`hibit it. Thalidomide inhibits IL-6, IL-10 and IL-12
`productionl50·51·561 and enhances IL-4 and IL-5 pro(cid:173)
`duction.C451 IL-6 is a potent growth factor for malig(cid:173)
`nant plasma cells and its inhibition may be partly
`responsible for the action of thalidomide in my (cid:173)
`eloma. In addition to increasing total lymphocyte
`cmmts as well as CD4+ and CD8+ Tcells,l48.60J tha(cid:173)
`lidomide is a potent costimulator of T lympho(cid:173)
`cytes.1521
`Angiogenesis is important in tumour progres(cid:173)
`sion and correlates with prognosis in a number of
`malignant diseases.l61·62l D ' Amato et aI.l43l were the
`first to show the angiogenesis inhibitory activity of
`thalidomide in a rabbit model of corneal neovas(cid:173)
`cularisation induced by basic fibroblast growth
`factor. These data have subsequently been con(cid:173)
`fim1ed in other studies,[49.53.54.571 and the combina(cid:173)
`tion of thalidomide and sulindac,l59l a nonsteroidal
`anti -inflammatory agent with antiangiogenic activ(cid:173)
`ity, has been shown to be synergistic in inhibiting
`angiogenesis.
`
`2. Clinical Studies
`
`2.1 Multiple Myeloma/Plasma Cell Disorders
`
`Thalidomide was administered to patients with
`terminal myeloma191 on the basis of observations
`that bone marrow angiogenesis was prominent in
`active myeloma1631 and thalidomide inhibited an(cid:173)
`giogenesis.C43l After treating 5 patients on a compas(cid:173)
`sionate basis, Singha! et al.l91 treated 84 additional
`patients with thalidomide as a single agent for 2 to
`465 days on a US Food and Dmg Administration(cid:173)
`approved protocol. Most patients had relapsed after
`a preceding autotransplant. The starting dose of
`200mg daily was increased by 200mg every 2
`weeks to a maximum of800mg. 32% of the patients
`responded, with the serum or urine paraprotein lev(cid:173)
`els declining by ~90% in 8 patients (including 2
`complete remissions), ~75% in 6, ~50% in 7, and
`~25% in 6. Paraprotein reduction was evident
`
`References
`Action
`Inhibition of angiogenesis
`43,49,53,54,57,59
`Alteration of adhesion molecule expression 42,44,47
`Selective inhibition of tumour necrosis
`40,41 ,51 ,55,56,58
`factor-a production
`Induction ofTh2 cytokine production (IL-4
`and IL-5)
`Variable effects of interferon-y production
`Increase in the synthesis of IL-2 by
`mononuclear ce lls
`48
`Increase in soluble IL-2 receptor levels
`Inhibition of IL-6, IL-10 and IL-12 production 50,51,56
`Increase in total lymphocyte and CD4+ and 48,60
`CD8+ T cell numbers
`Costimulation of T lymphocytes
`IL = interleukin ; Th = helper T lymphocyte.
`
`45
`
`45,51,55.56
`46
`
`52
`
`
`
`
`
`BioDrugs 2001 ; 15 (3)
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1032 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`Thalidomide i.n Cane r
`
`165
`
`within 2 months in 78% of the responders. Responses
`were associated with reduction in marrow plas(cid:173)
`macytosis. The actuarial 1-year overall and event(cid:173)
`free survival was 58% and 22%, respectively. Cur(cid:173)
`rently, after more than 2 years of follow-up, 60%
`of responding patients have relapsed.
`These encouraging data have now been repli(cid:173)
`cated by a number of other groups.l 19-23,25,27,28,32,33 J
`The response rates described have varied between
`20 and 70%. It is clear that not all patients respond
`to thalidomide, and that a number of responding
`patients evenh1ally relapse. The combination of
`thalidomide with dexamethasonel27,391 or chemo(cid:173)
`therapyC 18·20·241 ('angiochemotherapy ' ) has been
`found to be active under these circumstances. The
`2 noteworthy combinations are OT-PACE (dexa(cid:173)
`methasone, thalidomide, cisplatin, doxonibicin,
`cyclophospham.ide, etoposide)fl 8l and BLT-0 (cla(cid:173)
`rithromycin, thalidomide, dexamethasone). l39l OT(cid:173)
`PACE (2 cycles) resulted in ~50% paraprotein de(cid:173)
`cline in almost 70% of previously treated patients.
`However, the mortality was considerable, with 3 of
`43 patients dying of tox.icity.P 81 BLT-0 was toler(cid:173)
`ated well by 17 patients with myeloma (n = 14) or
`Waldenstrom's macroglobulinaemia (n = 3), with
`all 14 evaluable patients showing a response [in(cid:173)
`cluding 3 complete responses (CR)].1391 The daily
`dose of thalidomide used in the OT-PACE regimen
`was 200 to 400mg, and that in the BLT-0 regimen,
`50 to 200mg.
`How thalidomide is best used in a patient with
`relapsed myeloma depends on the tempo of disease
`progression and bone marrow reserves. For in(cid:173)
`stance, if the disease is slowly progressive , thalid(cid:173)
`omide can be used as a single agent. Chemotherapy
`or corticosteroids can be added if there is no re(cid:173)
`sponse. On the other hand, if the disease is rapidly
`progressive, a combination of agents may have to
`be used from the beginning.
`We have used thalidomide as a single agent at
`the dose of 200 to 400mg to treat 12 previously
`untreated patients who refused standard therapy.
`Paraprotein declined by ~50% in 8 patients, and
`this response has b en sustained on continued ther(cid:173)
`apy for over 8 months in 7 patients (unpublished
`
`observations). More data are required before the
`drug can be recommended as first-line therapy of
`myeloma outside the setting of a comparative clin(cid:173)
`ical trial. However, in patients refusing standard
`therapy, thalidomide is a reasonable choice .
`Thalidomide can be administered as maintenance
`therapy following autologous stem cell tranplanta(cid:173)
`tion as a means of prolonging remission duration.
`We use thalidomide for post-transplant mainte(cid:173)
`nance in patients who cannot tolerate IFN-a or
`dexamethasone, have poor marrow function, or
`have disease that was unresponsive to dexametha(cid:173)
`sone or responsive to thalidomide before the trans(cid:173)
`plant (table 11).
`Thalidomide has been effective as a single agent
`400mg daily in previously treated patients with
`Waldenstrom 's macroglobulinaemia (A. Zomas,
`personal communication) . The BLT-0 combina(cid:173)
`tion regimen has also been reported to be effective
`in this indication.l39l We have used thaJidomide in
`a patient with Castleman 's disease with excellent
`response. The disease activity declined on thalido(cid:173)
`mide despite the reduction of prednisone from
`100mg daily to 5mg daily and was accompanied
`by nonnalisation of a grossly elevated IL-6 level.
`There are no reports on the use of thalidomide in
`amyloidosis or POEMS (Polyneuropathy, Or(cid:173)
`ganomegaly, Endocrine abnonnalities, Monoclonal
`protein, Skin changes) syndrome.
`
`Table II. Our criteria for selection of patients for thalidomide main(cid:173)
`tenance after autotransplantation (based on unpublished observa(cid:173)
`tions)
`
`Clinical situation
`Already autografted
`
`Not autografted yet
`
`Patient selection
`1. History of response to thalidomide in
`the past
`2. Intolerance of dexamethasone and
`interferon
`3. No response to dexamethasone in the
`past (alternative to interferon)
`4. Poor marrow function (alternative to
`dexamethasone)
`Pretransplant therapeutic trial of
`thalidomide for 6 weeks: responders can
`receive thalidomide after transplant,
`whereas nonresponders should receive
`dexamethasone and/or interferon
`
`
`
`BioDrugs 2001 ; 15 (3)
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1032 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`166
`
`Singha/ & M ehta
`
`2.2 Myelodysplastic Syndromes
`
`IntrameduJ lary apoptosis of bone marrow eel Is,
`probably mediated by TNFa,l64l is responsible for
`the cytopenias that characterise myelodysplastic
`syndromes (MDS). In an attempt to exploit the se(cid:173)
`lective TNFa-inhibitory effect of thalidomide,
`Raza et aJ.l38l treated 61 patients with MDS with
`thalidomide 100 to 400mg for 12 weeks. 22 patients
`had refractory anaemia (RA) , 13 had RA with
`ringed sideroblasts, 19 had RA ·with excess blasts
`(RAEB), 4 had RAEB in transfonnation, and 3 had
`chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. At the time of
`the report, 11 had stopped therapy, 25 had not re(cid:173)
`ceived the drug long enough, and 17 of the remain(cid:173)
`ing 25 evaluable patients had shown improvement
`in cytopenia (3 trilineage, 4 bilineage, 10 single Lin(cid:173)
`eage). The best responses were seen in the erythroid
`series, with a number of patients becoming trans(cid:173)
`f11sion-independent. Longer follow-up is required
`to see how long these responses are sustained.
`Thalidomide-containing angiochemotherapy
`combinations may be active in RAEB , RAEB in
`transformation and secondary acute myeloid leu(cid:173)
`kaemia. These combinations (liposomal anthracy(cid:173)
`cline with topotecan or cytarabine ; with or with(cid:173)
`out thalidomide) are being studied currently.[291
`
`2.3 Kaposi's Sarcoma
`
`Soler et al.[1 31 described a 14-year-old girl with
`HIV infection and subcutaneous Kaposi 's sarcoma
`(KS) who received thalidomide for aphthous ul(cid:173)
`cers. This resulted in regression of KS lesions dis(cid:173)
`appearance of KS-associated herpesvirns (KSHV)
`DNA from blood and reduced viral load in tumour
`tissue. Fife et al.P51 administered 100mg thalido(cid:173)
`mide daily for 8 weeks to 17 patients ,•,rith AIDS(cid:173)
`related KS. Six patients achieved a partial response
`and viral DNA load decreased to undetectable
`levels in 3 of the 5 responders assessed virologi(cid:173)
`cally.
`Little et al.1361 treated 20 HIV-positive patients
`who had progressive KS with 200mg thalidomide
`in a phase II study. The dose was escalated to
`1000mg for up to a year. Eight patients had partial
`
`response and 2 had stabilisation of progressive dis(cid:173)
`ease. The median drng dose at the time of response
`was 500mg. The median duration of therapy was
`6.3 months, and the median time to progression 7.3
`months. KSHV DNA titres were not studied. The
`disappearance of viral DNA in responding patients
`is of interest in the context of the activity of thalid(cid:173)
`omide in myeloma and the fact that some groups
`have isolated KSHV DNA in pati.ents with my (cid:173)
`eloma.l651
`
`2.4 Breast Cancer
`
`Eisen et at.l3°J studied 12 patients with breast
`cancer as part of a group of 66 patients with various
`cancers who received 100mg thalidomide daily.
`No objective response was seen in any of these
`12 patients. Baidas et al. C3 7l studied the efficacy of
`thalidomide in 28 women with heavily pretreated,
`progressive metastatic breast cancer who were
`randomised to receive either 200 or 800mg thalid(cid:173)
`omide daily. No response was seen in any patient.
`13 of 14 patients receiving 800mg thalidomide ex(cid:173)
`perienced progressive disease within 8 weeks, com(cid:173)
`pared with 12 of 14 in the 200mg arm. Two patients
`in the 200mg arm had stable disease at 8 weeks.
`Nguyen et al.1 141 administered 100 to 300mg
`thalidomide daily for 4 weeks in addition to stand(cid:173)
`ard chemotherapy in 7 women with breast cancer.
`With a follow-up of 1 to 6 months, patients with stage
`4 disease had either a partial response or stabilisa(cid:173)
`tion of disease. However, the disease eventually pro(cid:173)
`gressed in the 2 patients with the longest follow-up
`(5 and 6 months).
`These studies included patients with advanced
`disease and used the drng as a single agent or for a
`limited duration. More benefit might be seen if tha(cid:173)
`lidomide is combined with chemotherapy and then
`continued as maintenance therapy for an extended
`period, although such an approach requires system(cid:173)
`atic investigation.
`
`2.5Glioma
`
`Because malignant gliomas are vascular tu(cid:173)
`mours, angiogenesis inhibition may be therapeuti(cid:173)
`cally beneficial. Fine et al.f3 IJ administered thalid-
`
`
`
`BioDrugs 2001; 15 (3)
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1032 PAGE 4
`
`

`

`Thalidomide i.n Cane r
`
`167
`
`omide to 3 9 patients with anaplastic mixed glioma,
`anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma multi(cid:173)
`forme who had radiological evidence of progres(cid:173)
`sion after external-beam radiation with or without
`chemotherapy. The drug was started at the daily
`dose of 800mg and increased by 200mg every 2
`weeks to 1200mg. Among the 36 evaluable pa(cid:173)
`tients, there were 2 radiologically evident partial
`responses (6%), 2 minor responses (6%) and 12
`patients (33%) with stable disease. Eight patients
`were alive over a year after starting therapy, most
`with progressive disease. Once again, it is likely
`that thalidomide will have to be used as part of a
`multimodaJity treatment plan if it is to be of any
`benefit in this setting.
`
`2.6 Colon Cancer
`
`Govindarajan et al.f35l treated 9 colon cancer pa(cid:173)
`tients with irinotecan (325 to 350 mg/m2 every 3
`weeks) and 400mg thalidomide daily as second(cid:173)
`line therapy. None of the patients had been treated
`with irinotecan in the past. Thalidomide was found
`to eliminate the dose-limiting gastrointestinal side
`effects of irinotecan, especially nausea and diar(cid:173)
`rhoea, almost completely, pennitting 8 of 9 pa(cid:173)
`tients to complete therapy. Of the 7 patients evalu(cid:173)
`able for response, 1 attained complete remission and
`2 partial remission. These data have important im(cid:173)
`plications for the tolerability as well as efficacy of
`angiochemotherapy in colon cancer.
`
`Hodgkin's disease relapsing after autotransplanta(cid:173)
`tion (unpublished observations), Langerhans cell
`histiocytosis,r10· 12-16l hepatocellular carcinoma,f341
`and chronic myeloproliferative disorders.f29l No
`responses were seen in ovarian cancer and advanced
`melanoma. [3o1
`
`2.9 Graft-versus-Host Disease
`
`Thalidomide is irnmunomodulatory rather than
`imrnunosuppressive in its action. In fact, thalidomide
`increases total lymphocyte counts as well as CD4+
`and CD8+ lymphocytes. It is likely that its benefi(cid:173)
`cial effect in treating established chronic GVHDl6J
`is a result of TNFa inhibition. Thalidomide has
`little effect on acute GVHD,[661 and prophylactic
`use of the drug, paradoxically, has been shown to
`result in increased chronic GVHD.f671 This may be
`because of some immunostimulatory effects.
`GVHD and graft-versus-tumour effects are of(cid:173)
`ten closely linked. Thus, when GVHD resolves with
`successful immunosuppression, the underlying
`malignant disease often recurs. It was anecdotally
`observed in a small series that the patients whose
`GVHD resolved with thalidomide treatment did
`not relapse.C66l If this interesting observation is
`confinned, it could mean that the immunomodula(cid:173)
`tory and/or antiangiogenesis effects ofthalidom.ide
`may allov,1 separation of GVHD and gTaft-versus(cid:173)
`tumour effects in patients with established chronic
`GVHD.
`
`2.7 Renal Cell Carcinoma
`
`2.10 Cancer Cachexia
`
`Among 18 patients ·with renal cell carcinoma
`which was progressive despite biochemotherapy, 3
`partial responses were noted with thalidomide
`monotherapy. One lasted 5 months, and the other
`two were ongoing at 5 and 11 months at the time
`of the report. 13 of the remaining 16 patients expe(cid:173)
`rienced disease stabilisation for 1 to 3 months (10)
`or >3 months (3).L30J
`
`High levels ofTNFa have been linked with can(cid:173)
`cer cachexia and malaise. Because of its effects on
`TNFa, thalidomide was explored in 72 terminal
`cancer patients who were not receiving any cyto(cid:173)
`toxic therapy at the dose of 100mg at night for 10
`days. Among the 37 evaluable patients, 44 to 69%
`reported significant improvement in insomnia,
`nausea, appetite and sensation of well-being.
`
`2.8 Other Cancers
`
`3. Dosage and Administration
`
`Responses to thalidomide as a single agent at
`the dose of 200 to 400mg daily have been seen in
`
`No systematic dose escalation studies of thalid(cid:173)
`omide have been performed in any disease. The
`
`
`
`BioDrugs 2001 ; 15 (3)
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1032 PAGE 5
`
`

`

`168
`
`Singha/ & M ehta
`
`doses used have varied v.ridely between 50 and
`1200mg daily, and responses have been seen at all
`dose levels. Dose escalation in the myeloma study
`was time-dependent, and thus the effect of the du(cid:173)
`ration of therapy was inseparable from the effect of
`dose.191 Based on the effect of dose adjustment on
`the extent of response in myeloma, we have ob(cid:173)
`served a clear dose-response relationship in some
`patients.
`When used off-protocol , the drug should be
`started at the dose of 100 to 200mg daily and esca(cid:173)
`lated in 50 to 100mg steps every week to a target
`dose of 400 to 800mg. The optimum do se for a
`given patient is one that is best tolerated by that
`individual.
`Most studies have used the dmg as a single bed(cid:173)
`time dose. In the myeloma study, tltis was changed
`only occasionally to divided dos s in patients with
`excessive drowsiness in th morning. Although we
`have not noticed any effect of divided doses, a Swe(cid:173)
`dish group has reported faster and better responses
`in myeloma patients receiving the dmg in divided
`doses.l33l Since the half-life of thalidomide is 6 to
`7 hours, tltis may be preferable to single daily dose
`admi1tistration of the drug.
`
`4. Adverse Effects
`
`Severe teratogenicity, historically the most im(cid:173)
`portant adverse effect of thalidomide, is less rele(cid:173)
`vant in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy
`than in other patient populations. To minimise the
`risk of teratogenicity Celgene Corporation (War(cid:173)
`ren, New Jersey, USA), the American manufacturer
`of thalidomide, has developed a progra1mne called
`STEPS (System for Thalidomide Education and
`Prescribing Safety) for controlling and monitoring
`access to thalidontide.f681 The programme ensures
`education of physicians pharmacists and patients
`on precautions to avoid teratogenicity.
`Drowsiness, constipation, weakness, fatigue,
`tingling and/or numbness in the hands and the feet,
`dizziness and skin rash are the predominant ad(cid:173)
`verse effects of thalidomide. In the study of Singhal
`et al. ,(91 75% of patients experienced some adverse
`effect at the 1ninimmn dose of 200mg daily, whereas
`
`over 90% of patients experienced adverse effects
`at the maximum dose of800mg daily. Most adverse
`effects were WHO grade I or II, and only 10% of
`patients discontinued the drug because of adverse
`effects. Because sedation is the outstanding ad(cid:173)
`verse effect, the use of sedatives and tranquillisers
`in patients taking thalidomide should be mini(cid:173)
`mised.
`There is some concern that thrombotic phenom(cid:173)
`ena occur more commonly in patients receiving
`thalidomide,118,28,691 although it must be borne in
`mind that the underlying diseases are also associ(cid:173)
`ated with a predisposition to thrombosis.
`The occurrence of symptoms of peripheral neu(cid:173)
`ropathy in women taking thalidomide was the rea(cid:173)
`son that the dmg was not approved for use in US
`initially. We have found symptoms of neuropathy
`in approximately 30% of patients who take thalid(cid:173)
`omide, but onJy half have had objective changes on
`nerve conduction studies. Thalidomide-induced
`peripheral neuropathy is typically symmetrical and
`is characterised by painful paraesthesias of the
`hands and feet, often accompanied by sensory loss
`in the feet. The symptoms apparently do not correl(cid:173)
`ate with the duration of treatment or the dose,170-721
`and women and older persons are at greater risk.17°1
`There is some suggestion that slow acetylators may
`be more predisposed to neuropathy.L71 l We have
`found pyridoxine (vitamin B6) to relieve neuro(cid:173)
`pathic symptoms in a number of patients at the dose
`of 200mg daily. Prophy lactic use of pyridoxine
`100mg daily with thalidomide appears to reduce
`the frequency of such symptoms (unpublished ob(cid:173)
`servations).
`In general, if the adverse effects are tolerable,
`patients should be encouraged to continue the drug
`at the same dosage . If the symptoms are difficult
`to tolerate, a step-v.1ise reduction in dose to find a
`Level that is better to lerated is reasonable. Occa(cid:173)
`sionally, the drng may need to be discontinued for
`a period of 2 to 3 weeks and then restarted at a
`lower dose.
`Table III shows our approach to managing spe(cid:173)
`cific adverse events. The skin and cardiac events
`mentioned in the table need some elaboration.
`
`
`
`BioDrugs 2001 ; 15 (3)
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1032 PAGE 6
`
`

`

`Thalidomide i.n Cane r
`
`169
`
`Table 111. Suggested approach to managing specific adverse effects of thalidomide therapy
`
`Adverse event
`
`Type/severity
`
`Management
`
`Comments
`
`Bradycardia
`
`Mild: decrease in resting heart
`rate by 10-20/min; rate >60
`
`Watch carefully; counsel patient to monitor
`pulse daily; continue thalidomide
`
`Avoid concomitant ~-blocker usage
`
`As above; check ECG; continue thalidomide As above
`if no hypotension or syncopal episodes and
`normal ECG; stop thalidomide if there are
`symptoms or ECG abnormalities
`
`Moderate: rate 50-60
`
`Severe: rate <50
`
`Skin rash
`
`Erythematous, maculopapular,
`itchy lesions
`
`Erythema multiforme
`(Stevens-Johnson syndrome)
`
`Peripheral
`neuropathy
`
`Mild symptoms
`
`Moderate symptoms
`
`Severe symptoms
`
`Stop thalidomide immediately; check ECG;
`evaluation for sick sinus syndrome or
`autonomic neuropathy may be necessary
`
`Local corticosteroid cream; if no re lief,
`decrease dose gradually or stop the drug
`and restart at a lower dose
`
`Discontinue tha lidomide; absolute
`contraindication for repeat administration of
`the drug
`
`Increase pyri doxine dose to 200mg daily;
`additional vitamin 81 , 812 and fo late may be
`helpful in some patients; continue
`thalidom ide
`
`As above; continue thalidomide if symptoms
`intermittent; stop thalidomide if symptoms
`continuous
`
`As above; stop thalidomide; nerve
`conduction studies to evaluate extent of
`neuropathic changes
`
`Consider pacemaker implantation if
`thalidomide considered unavoidable
`
`Baseline nerve conduction studies
`may be useful in patients with
`pre-existing neuropathic symptoms
`
`As above; thalidomide may be
`restarted if symptoms abate
`
`As above; thalidomide may be
`restarted at a lower dose if
`symptoms abate and therapy
`considered unavoidable
`
`Consider prophylactic warfarin in
`patients with a prior history of deep
`vein thrombosis
`
`Thrombosis
`
`Deep vein thrombosis
`
`Therapeutic anticoagulation
`
`Most patients who develop a rash have maculopap(cid:173)
`ular lesions. However, a rash resembling Stevens(cid:173)
`Johnson syndrome is seen in approximately 1 % of
`patients. In the firs t such patient,1251 rechallenge
`resulted in recurrence of Stevens-Jolmson syndrome
`which was fatal. In the subsequent patient, the drug
`was not reintroduced and the reaction did not recur.
`Recently, life-threatening toxic epidennal necrolysis
`has been described in newly diagnosed myeloma
`patients treated with the combination of thalido(cid:173)
`mide and dexamethasone.1731 The investigators ad(cid:173)
`vocated caution in the us of this drug combination
`in newly diagnosed patients.1731 Toxic epidermal
`necrolysis has also been described in 1 patient with
`glioblastoma who was receiving thalidomide.C741
`
`We have seen bradycardia of unclear aetiology
`in approximately 5% of patients treated with tha(cid:173)
`lidomide. Since there have been no blood pressure
`:fluctuations in these patients, it is unclear if this
`represents a form of autonomic neuropathy. How(cid:173)
`ever, caution is warranted if bradycardia develops,
`especially if patients are already on drugs such as
`[3-blockers for hypertension.
`
`5. Conclusions
`
`The use of thalidomide in myeloma provided
`the crucial proof of principle that a drug apparently
`lacking conventional cytotoxic activity could have
`meaningful antimalignancy action. It is now im(cid:173)
`portant to ensure that patients likely to benefit from
`
`
`
`BioDrugs 2001 ; 15 (3)
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1032 PAGE 7
`
`

`

`170
`
`Singha/ & M ehta
`
`thalidomide have access to it, and that it is evalu(cid:173)
`ated systematically in other cancers. In diseases
`such as myeloma where its activity is undisputed,
`thalidomide should be considered as salvage ther(cid:173)
`apy at the appropriate time (relapsed or refractory
`disease) . Its use in early disease is best confined to
`clinical studies or any situation where more con(cid:173)
`ventional therapy is not feasible . In disease where
`the action of thalidomide has not been conclusively
`shown, it should be used in the setting of well de(cid:173)
`signed clinical trials . In the absence of such studies,
`its use singly or in combination with standard ther(cid:173)
`apy could be considered in patients in whom no
`standard therapeutic options or alternative clinical
`studies of salvage therapy are avai lable.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`Disclosure: Drs Singha! and Mehta own stock in Celgene
`Corporation, the company which manufactures and markets
`thalidomide in USA.
`
`References
`1. A1mas GJ. Elias S. Thalidomide and Ute Ti tanic: reconstnicting
`the technology tragedies of the twentieth century. Am J Public
`Health 1999: 89 : 98-1 0 1
`2. Koch HP. Thalidomide and congeners as anti -i nflammatory
`agents. Prog Med Chem 1985; 22 : 165-242
`3. Zwingenberger K. Wnendt S. lmmunomodulation by thalido (cid:173)
`mide : systematic review of U1c literature and of unpublished
`observations. J ln1lamm 1995; 46 : 177-211
`4. Corral LG. Kaplan G. lnununomodulation by thalidomide and
`tJtalidomide analogues. Aim Rheum Dis 1999; 58 Suppl. I :
`1107-13
`5. Shcskin J. The treatmcm of lcpra reaction in lcpromatous lep(cid:173)
`rosy. Fifteen years ' e:>."])erience with U1alidomide. Int J Dennatol
`1980: 19: 3 18-22
`6. Vogelsang GB. Fanner ER. Hess AD. et al. Thalidomide for the
`trcauncnt of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Engl J Med
`1992; 326: 1055-8
`7. Olson KB , Hall T, Horton J. c t al. Thalidomide (N-phthaloyl(cid:173)
`glutamidc) in the treatment of advanced cancer. Clin Phar(cid:173)
`macol Ther 1965: 6: 292-7
`8. Grabstad H. Golbcy R . Clinical experiences with thalidomide
`in patients with cancer. Clin Phannacol Ther 1965: 6: 298-302
`9. Singha! S, Mehta J, Dcsikan R. ct al. Antitumor activity of tha(cid:173)
`lidomide in refractory multiple mye loma. Engl J Med 1999 :
`341 : 1565-7 1
`10. Bensaid P. Machel L. Vaillant L. e t al. Langerhans-cell histio(cid:173)
`cy tosis in tJ1e adult: regressive parotid invo lvement follow(cid:173)
`ing thalidomide therapy. Ann Dcrma10I Vcncreol 1992; 119:
`281-3
`11. Thomas L, Ducros B, Sccchi T, cl al. Successful 1rcatmcn1 of
`adult 's Langerhans cell histiocytosis with U1alidomide. Report
`of two cases and literature review. Arch Denna to I 1993: 129:
`126 1-4
`
`12. Dallafior S. Pugin P. Cerny T. et al. Successful treatment of a
`case of cutaneous Langerhans cell granulomalosis wilh 2-
`chlorodeoxyadenosine and thalidomide. Hautarzt 1995: 46 :
`553-60
`13. Soler RA. Howa rd M. Brink NS. et al. Regression of AIDS-re(cid:173)
`lated Kaposi's sarcoma during therapy wiU1 thalidomide. Clin
`Infect Dis 1996: 23 : 501-3
`14. guycn M , Tran C, Barsky S, ct al. Thalidomide and chemo(cid:173)
`therapy combination : preliminary results of preclinical and
`clinical studies. lnt J Oncol 1997; 10: 965-9
`15. Fife K. Howard MR. Gracie F. et al. Activity of thalidomide in
`AIDS -related Kaposi 's sarcoma a nd correlation with HHV8
`titre. Int J STD AIDS 1998: 9 : 751 -5
`, ct al. Langerhans histiocytosis in
`16. Lair G, Marie I, Caillcux
`adults: cutaneous and mucous lesion regress ion after treat(cid:173)
`ment with tltalidomidc. Rev Med lntcrn 1998; 19: 196-8
`17. Figg WD. Raje S. Bauer KS. et al. Pharmacokinetics of thalid(cid:173)
`omide in an elderly prostate cancer population. J Phann Sci
`1999: 88: 121-5
`18. Munshi N, Desikan R, Zangari M. et al. Chemoangiotherapy
`with OT-PACE for previously treated multiple mye loma
`(MM) (abstracl). Blood 1999 ; 94 Suppl. I: no. 540
`19. Ncbcn K, Hawighorst H, Mochler TM. Clinical response to
`lltalidomidc monolhcrapy correlates wilh improvemclll in dy(cid:173)
`namic magnetic resonance (d-MRI) angiogenesis parameters
`(abstract]. Blood 1999; 94 Suppl. I : no. 545
`20. Moehle rTM. Neben K. Egere rG. et al. Thalidomide plusCED(cid:173)
`chcmothcrapy i.n patients with poor prognosis multiple my(cid:173)
`eloma labslrac(J. Blood 1999: 94 Suppl. I: no. 547
`2 1. Sabir T, Raza S, Anderson L. et al. Thalidomide is cITcctivc in
`the treatment of rec

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket