throbber
screws Sept 2009
`
`Page 3. of2
`
`' item;
`
`-_ scrnrrvrs acre '
`
`ecrnrms 2013
`
`The European Committee for Treatment and Research in MS held their annual
`meeting from September 9-12. Here are some of the presentations that!
`found interesting.
`
`3. Active Clinical Trials at UT .
`_ 201s
`
`Z
`
`3
`
`.
`
`..
`
`'
`
`- scrnlrvis 2017
`Acrnrrvrs Forum 2017'
`
`,
`
`scrnnvrs 201s
`Téctldoroupdatc
`' 5eptember.2_018
`.'
`screams 2015'
`
`'
`
`..Anrv2015
`
`5 swarms-screws 2014 "
`
`AAN 2014 I
`
`'
`
`_. Current Treatments -'
`(updated‘r‘ii'flal
`
`'
`
`ilerlyo (updated aracnorzr'
`Tysabriand PML '. _
`A'mpyro
`
`'
`
`it reduced relapse rate by
`
`Treatment
`There were reports on a number of clinical trials, mainly of oral agents which are summarized below.
`Fingolimod: Further results from the TRANSFORMS study were reported. The initial results were
`reported at AAN earlierthis year. This was a targe study with over 400 patients per arm, and
`fingolimod was compared to interferon rather than using a placebo control. The effectiveness looks
`good with over a 50% reduction in relapse rate. Safety is a concern, since there were 2 fatst virus
`infections in the treatment group.
`. Oral ciadribine, further results from the CLARITY study. Again. the initial results of this study
`"
`.‘ were reported at the AAN, and it was a large study with over 400 patients in each group,
`with cladn‘bine compared to placebo. The retapse rate was reduced 58%. and MRI activity
`decreased 83%. No safety concerns were identified, but they remain a concern with a cytotoxic
`drug like this.
`' BG12 or tumarate: This agent is earlier in the clinical trial process.
`about 30% compared to placebo.
`Laquinimod: they reported safety results which look promising.
`Terifiunomide: This is another orai agent with immunomcdulatory effects. This was a phase ii
`study with around 49 patients per arm, and the drug was used as an add-on to interferon. MRI
`activity decreased by about 80%.
`Atorvastatin in early MS: this is a cholesterol lowering drug. which may also be useful in MS.
`They didn't enroll as many patients as they planned with only 82 total patients, and there wasn't any
`obvious benefit.
`
`
`
`Recent and. current
`research
`.Old meetings ..
`
`I'
`
`New diagnosis of MS I
`
`'
`
`Information
`1 ”WP"? Edema 8°“ '
`.
`Into damn versus
`Giotiramer--updale 11m?
`
`Dimcotide: This is a peptide from myelin basic protein, and it was used in a study with over 500
`- secondary progressive MS patients. There was no benefit.
`in summary, there are a number of oral treatments in development. some of which may be more
`effective than our current standard treatments. The combination of increased effectiveness and
`'. safety is elusive. The single trial in progressive MS was negative. but it is good to see treatments
`3 being tried in progressive disease since the majority of drugs are for relapsing MS.
`
`3 alk on stem certs-arrows
`About Dr. Lindsey _
`
`-
`
`.-
`._
`
`Research Interests
`_ MapiDirections__ _-
`Links
`Clinic information
`Contact Us
`
`3 Science
`
`l heard several presentations of some fresh ideas. One ofthe keynote lectures was given by Dr.
`':_ Prineas. a pathologist, who has some different ideas on the cause of MS. Most researchers focus on
`the role of autoimmunity in damaging myelin and oligodendrocytes. Dr. Prineas suggested that the
`. primary problem in MS is that oltgodendrocytes die off first. and then the immune cells come in to
`clean up the myelin debris. He thinks the primary problem may be with the astrocytes. one of the
`cells in the brain that provides support to the other cells.
`l'm not sure he has a convincing story yet.
`. but he definitety has interesting ideas and a different approach.
`-' Dr. Derfuss from Dr. Meinl's group gave an excellent talk on the proteins neurofascin and contactin
`.. as possible targets of the autoimmune attack in MS. These are relatively minor proteins, but they
`.' are located at the junction where the myetin binds to the axon. These proteins were first identified
`. by finding myelin proteins that were recognized by antibodies from MS patients. and they have gone
`.- on to do experimental work to demonstrate that immune attack on these proteins can cause
`-. demyelination. We definitely need to think beyond myelin basic protein and proteolipid protein as
`the targets of immune attack, and I think this is a step in the right direction.
`Epstein-Barr virus continues to be controversial. Some investigators can find it in the brain, and
`-_ others cannot.
`i think it will be a while before that issue is settled.
`
`.
`
`http:/Iwwwjiwindscyrud.comiid69.html
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`9/16/2019
`
`Biogen Exhibit 2228
`
`Mylan v. Biogen
`IPR 2018-01403
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`Biogen Exhibit 2228
`Mylan v. Biogen
`IPR 2018-01403
`
`

`

`ECTRIMS 394312009
`
`J. William Lindsey. MD
`University of Texas Multipie Sclemsis Research Group
`Houston. Texas
`
`copyright 2007-2020 John Wililam Lindsey
`
`Page 2 of2
`
`
`
`http:/Imvawliudsoymdxomlid69.htmE
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`9l1612019
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket