throbber
IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` Case IPR2018-00933, IPR2018-00934,
` IPR2018-00935
`
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
`INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.,
` Petitioner,
` v.
`ETHICON LLC,
` Patent Owner.
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
`
` DEPOSITION of GREGORY FISCHER, Ph.D.
` February 18, 2019
` Boston, Massachusetts
`
`Reporter: Michael D. O'Connor, RMR, CRR, CRC
`Job No. 46128
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.001
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`2
`
` Monday, February 18, 2019
` 10:05 a.m.
`
` DEPOSITION of GREGORY FISCHER,
`Ph.D., held at Fish & Richardson, P.C., One
`Marina Park Drive, Boston, Massachusetts,
`pursuant to notice, before Michael D.
`O'Connor, Registered Merit Reporter,
`Certified Realtime Reporter, Certified
`Realtime Captioner, and Notary Public in and
`for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6
`
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.002
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`3
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER:
` FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C.
` One Marina Park Drive
` Boston, Massachusetts 02210
` (617) 521-7803
` BY: STEVEN R. KATZ, ESQ.
` katz@fr.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PATENT OWNER:
` WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
` 201 Redwood Shores Parkway
` Redwood Shores, California 94065
` (650) 802-3985
` BY: ROBERT S. MAGEE, ESQ.
` robert.magee@weil.com
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.003
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`4
`
`APPEARANCES (Cont'd):
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PATENT OWNER:
` WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
` 2001 M Street, N.W., Suite 600
` Washington, D.C. 20036
` (202) 682-7000
` BY: CHRISTOPHER MARANDO, ESQ.
` christopher.marando@weil.com
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.004
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
` I N D E X
`Deposition of: Page
`GREGORY FISCHER, Ph.D.
` By Mr. Magee 7
`
`5
`
` E X H I B I T S
`No. Page
`Exhibit 1 Patent Owner's Revised
` Notice of Deposition of
` Gregory Fischer Ph.D.,
` U.S. Patent 8,998,058 7
`Exhibit 2 Patent Owner's Revised
` Notice of Deposition of
` Gregory Fischer Ph.D.,
` U.S. Patent 8,991,677 7
`Exhibit 3 Patent Owner's Revised
` Notice of Deposition of
` Gregory Fischer Ph.D.,
` U.S. Patent 9,084,601 7
`Exhibit 4 Declaration of Dr. Gregory
` S. Fischer 7
`Exhibit 5 Document entitled, "Exhibit
` List" 11
`Exhibit 6 U.S. Patent 5,383,880 29
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5 6 7
`
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.005
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`6
`
` E X H I B I T S (Cont'd)
`No. Page
`Exhibit 7 U.S. Patent 8,998,058 91
`Exhibit 8 U.S. Patent 8,991,677 131
`Exhibit 9 U.S. Patent Application,
` Publication No.
` US 2005/0131390 A1 148
`Exhibit 10 U.S. Patent 5,964,394 163
`Exhibit 11 U.S. Patent 5,865,361 170
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.006
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`7
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
`
` GREGORY FISCHER, Ph.D.
`
`having been satisfactorily identified by the
`production of his driver's license, and duly
`sworn by the Notary Public, was examined and
`testified as follows:
`
` (Document marked as Exhibit 1
` for identification)
` (Document marked as Exhibit 2
` for identification)
` (Document marked as Exhibit 3
` for identification)
` (Document marked as Exhibit 4
` for identification)
`EXAMINATION BY
`MR. MAGEE:
` Q. Good morning, Dr. Fischer.
` A. Good morning.
` Q. Is Dr. Fischer how you prefer to
`be referred to?
` A. Yes. That's appropriate.
` Q. Okay. Great. Have you ever been
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.007
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`deposed before?
` A. Can you be more specific?
` Q. Have you ever been deposed in any
`legal proceeding before?
` A. I've never been deposed as an
`expert witness on anything similar to this
`before.
` Q. Okay. Have you been deposed as an
`expert witness in any capacity before?
` A. No, I have not.
` Q. Have you been deposed in a
`personal capacity before?
` A. Once.
` Q. Can you just give me a real high
`level of what that was about?
` A. Just regarded to the facts of an
`automobile accident.
` Q. Understood. So just to cover a
`few ground rules, I will do my best not to talk
`over you when you're giving an answer, and if
`you could try to do the same for me, allow me
`to finish my question and try to avoid talking
`over each other, that will make our court
`reporter's life a lot easier.
` A. Absolutely.
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.008
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q. And then one other thing, you said
`absolutely, if we could have verbal yes or no
`answers, not just nodding a head or hmm-hmm or
`something like that, that would be, again,
`making our court reporter's life a lot easier.
` A. Yes. Understood.
` Q. Thank you very much. Have you
`taken any medications today that would prevent
`you from giving full and complete testimony?
` A. No, not that I'm aware of.
` Q. And there's no other reason you're
`aware of where you wouldn't be able to give
`full and complete testimony today?
` A. No.
` Q. Dr. Fischer, what does
`"selectively" mean?
` A. So we have a reference to that in
`the deposition, the declaration, so I'd like to
`refer in here. Just give me one moment to find
`the specific reference to it in my declaration.
` I know that I have a very specific
`reference to "selective motion" in here, and
`I'm just trying to find that right now. That
`being said, I'm not willing to or able to opine
`on the broad definition of "selectively" at
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.009
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`10
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`this point. There's a specific example that
`demonstrates where the prior art does, in fact,
`include selectivity.
` Q. All right. Why don't we just take
`a second, and you can stop looking for a moment
`and we can go on to a different question.
` A. Sure.
` Q. First, I see you brought some
`things with you today. What did you bring?
` A. I have two notebooks with me here;
`one of them is my declaration. To the best of
`my understanding, this is exactly as was filed.
` I have a notebook that includes,
`to the best of my understanding, exact copies
`of all of the different exhibits. And then I
`have a list of the specific exhibits that are
`in this notebook.
` Q. Okay. So you were saying the
`first notebook is your declaration as filed; is
`that correct?
` A. To the best of my understanding,
`this is exactly as filed.
` Q. Okay. And then you said you have
`a second notebook that has the exhibits. Is
`that a collection of both the petitioner's and
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.010
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`the patent owner's exhibits?
` A. My understanding is that -- so I
`can provide you a list, if you'd like to see
`what exhibits are in here?
` Q. Sure.
` MR. MAGEE: Why don't we go ahead
` and mark that as Exhibit 5.
` (Document marked as Exhibit 5
` for identification)
` Q. Okay. Returning to the previous
`line of questioning on "selectively."
` A. Is it possible to have the index
`back?
` Q. Yes, of course.
` A. Thank you very much.
` Q. On the term "selectively," is it
`your understanding that "selectively" was given
`special meaning in any of the three asserted
`patents?
` A. I really wasn't able to make an
`opinion on the broad meaning of the word
`"selectivity." There is an example in here
`where I believe it is Heinrich refers to the
`ability of the user, which was, for example, a
`surgeon or a nurse or a user, to control -- I
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.011
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`prefer to find the exact wording here in the
`declaration so I can tell you exactly what my
`-- I'd like to direct you to Paragraph 118 of
`my declaration.
` Herein we say "the movement is
`selective because it is under the control of
`the user." So if we look at Paragraph 136 of
`Heinrich, the example is, in operation, the
`user, for example, a surgeon, nurse or
`technician, controls actuation assembly 612 to
`control the movement and operation of the
`disposable loading unit 618.
` Q. Okay. And Paragraph 118, which
`you directed us to, that's in the section, and
`I believe it starts on the previous page of
`your declaration, with the header "'To
`selectively move said axial drive assembly
`between a starting position and an ending
`position relative to the first and second
`jaws'"; is that correct?
` A. Within Claim 1.5; yes, that's
`correct.
` Q. So that heading refers and that
`limitation refers to "selectively move." In
`Paragraph 118 you say that the movement is
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.012
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`selective because it is under the control of
`the user; is that correct?
` A. Can you repeat that?
` Q. In Paragraph 118 you say the
`movement is selective because it is under the
`control of the user; is that correct?
` A. I use the word "the movement is
`selected because it is under the control of the
`user" in Paragraph 118, yes.
` Q. Okay. Do you have any other
`understanding of what "selectively" might mean?
` A. I'd really rather not. If there's
`a specific reference in here, I'd be happy to
`address it.
` Q. So you believe the claims use
`"selectively" differently in the same claim?
` A. If you have a particular spot, I'd
`be happy to address it.
` Q. Let me ask a broader question. In
`a patent claim, if a patentee uses the same
`word multiple times, should it have the same
`meaning or should it have different meanings?
` MR. KATZ: Objection. Legal
` conclusion.
` A. My understanding is it would
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.013
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`really depend on the context of how it's used.
` Q. Is "selectively" a term of art in
`the field of endoscopic instruments?
` A. I think this term is very
`dependent on the context in which it is used.
` Q. So there is no general
`understanding of the term "selectively" in the
`field of endoscopic instruments; is that
`correct?
` A. My opinion was to define an
`example. I'm really not comfortable defining
`what the scope of the word "selectivity" means.
` Q. So it's your opinion that you were
`a person of ordinary skill in the art as of
`2006; is that correct?
` A. I believe I said as of 2008, but
`yes.
` Q. As of 2008; that's fine. And as a
`person of ordinary skill in the field in 2008,
`had you encountered the term "selectively" in
`your work in the field?
` A. I honestly can't comment I've
`heard that word before. But in this context,
`this is the first time that I recall reading
`this in detail.
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.014
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q. I'm actually a little bit unsure
`about your last answer. Is it your testimony
`that you don't recall whether you heard
`"selectively" in your work in the field as of
`2008?
` A. I really can't comment if I've
`used that word before in this field.
` Q. What do you mean by you can't
`comment? Are you not answering the question or
`do you not recall?
` A. I cannot specifically recall a
`specific time that I used that term.
` Q. Okay. I understand. And you
`can't recall any specific meaning being
`assigned to that term in the field of
`endoscopic instruments as of 2008; is that
`correct?
` A. I haven't reviewed that, so I
`really would not be comfortable under oath
`saying there's a particular meaning for that.
` Q. But sitting here today, you can't
`recall one; is that correct?
` A. I can't recall any specific
`meaning.
` Q. Understood. What about the term
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.015
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`"operably," have you heard the term "operably"
`in your work in endoscopic instruments in 2008?
` A. I heard the word "operably." I
`can't point to a specific example.
` Q. And is it your understanding that
`the term "operably" has a specific meaning in
`the field of endoscopic instruments, at least
`as of 2008?
` A. My understanding is it's a very
`broad definition, and my work here when I was
`putting together my declaration was to find an
`example of something that was operably used.
`And we use that word with several suffixes.
` Q. Understood. In your review --
`actually, let me take a step back.
` In your work in this case, you
`opined on U.S. Patent 9,084,601; is that
`correct? I'm just reading that off the cover
`of your declaration.
` A. That's one of the challenged
`patents, correct.
` Q. And the second one is 8,998,058?
` A. The second patent, one of the
`challenged patents, yes.
` Q. Third one is 8,991,677?
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.016
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. That's correct. Those are the
`three challenged patents I was asked to review.
` Q. And for convenience today, can we
`refer to them, the first is the '601 patent,
`the second is the '058, and the third is the
`'677?
` A. Yes.
` Q. If I wanted to refer to all three
`of them, can I refer to all three of them as
`the power patents?
` A. If you would prefer.
` Q. Okay. But we would understand
`that's what we're talking about?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. Just wanted to make sure.
` In your review of these three
`patents, the power patents, did you identify
`any specific definition or meaning given to the
`word "selectively" in the patents?
` A. I believe I pointed out one
`specific example. If there's another example
`in the declaration, I'd be happy to clarify it.
` Q. Perhaps my question was unclear.
`I'm not asking if the term was ever used in the
`patent or in the claims. The question is more
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.017
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`specifically whether, in your opinion, the
`patentee assigned some sort of special meaning
`or special definition to the term?
` A. I would need to read it in more
`detail to see if that's the case.
` Q. When you say you would need to
`read it, what are you referring to?
` A. So in my declaration, I found an
`example that in my mind is very clearly an
`example of "selective." But if you would like
`me to opine more broadly what that term means
`or what the filers of the '601 patents or the
`power patents, in general, are referring to, I
`would need to reread those in more detail to
`try to identify that.
` Q. Okay. And then just so the record
`is clear, I have a copy of your declaration
`that's labeled as Exhibit 4. It should be
`identical to the copy in your binder, but going
`forward, I think we'll refer to the declaration
`as Exhibit 4. And again, the two copies are
`identical. You can take a look if you need to
`review.
` A. As far as I can tell from just
`looking at the cover, it appears to be a
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.018
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`similar document. Obviously without reviewing
`it, I can't tell you if it's exactly the same.
` Q. Sure. I will represent to you we
`just printed this off of the PTO website. It
`should be exactly the same as filed. If we can
`turn to Exhibit 4 to Page 29. Sorry, to be
`clear, that's the Word document, Page 29, which
`in the little tiny numbers at the bottom is
`actually Page 42.
` A. That's Section 6 in the claim
`construction?
` Q. Yes. Thank you. So in this
`section, you opined on the construction of
`asserted terms in these three patents; is that
`correct?
` A. Yes, that is.
` Q. Okay. And in Paragraph 56 you say
`that "as a general matter, the board applies
`the BRI standard to claims challenged in IPR
`proceedings."
` What is the BRI standard?
` A. There's another section in my
`declaration referring to my understanding of
`the law. If we go to Page 7. I'd like to read
`this. "I am not a lawyer and I will not
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.019
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`provide any legal opinions in this IPR.
`Although I am not a lawyer, I have been advised
`certain legal standards are to be applied by
`technical experts in forming opinions regarding
`the meaning and validity of patent claims."
` In the following paragraph,
`Paragraph 15, I discussed BRI or the broadest
`reasonable interpretation. "I understand that,
`during an IPR, claims are to be given their
`broadest reasonable interpretation in light of
`the specification as would have been read by a
`person of ordinary skill in the relevant art at
`the relevant time."
` Q. Okay. And turning back to Page
`29, your actual section on claim construction,
`you state in Paragraph 57 that you "have been
`informed that the following terms may require
`an express construction," and then you provide
`a number of constructions over the following,
`it looks like, eight pages.
` In that section, did you opine on
`any term using the word "selectively"?
` A. I would need to look closely at
`this to make sure. In my review of that
`section, I don't see those words used.
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.020
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q. Okay. So in your claim
`construction section, you did not set forth any
`special meaning for the term "selectively"; is
`that correct?
` A. I do not specifically see that.
` Q. Okay. Do you have any opinions
`regarding the invalidity of these patents that
`aren't expressed in this declaration?
` A. Could you repeat that?
` Q. Do you have any opinions regarding
`the invalidity of these three patents that are
`not expressed in your declaration?
` A. Can you reword that? I'm not
`really sure where you're going with that.
` Q. Are all of your opinions regarding
`the invalidity of these three patents contained
`in this declaration?
` A. I never looked specifically at
`that. I was purely looking at references that
`were in the prior art that were related to the
`claims here. I can't say that every single --
`every argument that I put in here I certainly
`stand behind. I can't say that there aren't
`other arguments beyond what is in here.
` Q. Do you have any other arguments
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.021
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`that are not expressed in your declaration?
` A. Everything here represents my
`personal opinions.
` Q. And do you have any opinions
`regarding these patents that aren't expressed
`in the declaration?
` A. No, sir.
` Q. Okay. Turning back to page,
`looking at the small number at the bottom, 81,
`Paragraphs 117 and 118 of your declaration.
` A. Yes. I'm there now.
` Q. Returning to the header on Page
`81, just above Paragraph 117, that term that
`you're discussing there is "'To selectively
`move said axial drive assembly between a
`starting position and an ending position
`relative to the first and second jaws,'"
`correct?
` A. That is part of Claim 1.5 of the
`'601 patent.
` Q. Yes. And Paragraphs 117 and 118
`are specifically talking about this portion of
`that limitation; is that correct?
` A. Yes. Paragraphs 117 and 118 of
`the declaration are referring to that
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.022
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`particular limitation of that claim.
` Q. Okay. And for that particular
`limitation, you didn't set forth any special
`construction or definition for any of those
`terms, did you?
` A. I'd like to just review this to
`make sure I understand exactly. So again,
`Paragraph 118 is what we said earlier, the
`movement is selective because it is under the
`control of the user.
` Q. Is there another way that movement
`could be selective other than being under the
`control of the user?
` A. Really, that's something that I
`haven't opined. What I can say is that as
`expressed in Heinrich, this movement is
`selective because it is under the control of
`the user.
` Q. Okay. And the limitation we're
`discussing, the header on Page 81, it recites,
`in part, "to selectively move."
` Is selectively moving different
`than just moving?
` A. So as I said here, the movement is
`selective, because it's under the control of
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.023
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`the user. The user has control of the
`movement.
` Q. And you set that forth in order to
`disclose your opinion on where Heinrich
`disclosed selectively moving, correct?
` A. Could you repeat that?
` Q. You provide in Paragraph 118 in
`order to disclose your opinion on where
`Heinrich disclosed selectively moving, correct?
` A. This is at least one example
`within Heinrich where I believe he is talking
`about selective movement, yes.
` Q. Okay. And the example you pointed
`to in Heinrich wasn't just movement, but it was
`movement that was under the control of the
`user, correct?
` A. In Paragraph 136 of Heinrich, it
`says, "In operation the user," which could be
`the "surgeon, nurse, technician, et cetera,
`controls actuation assembly 612 to control the
`movement and operation of the disposable
`loading unit."
` Q. And what part of that excerpt from
`Heinrich tells you that the movement is
`selective?
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.024
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. So in that statement, it says that
`the user controls the actuation assembly to
`control the movement and operation of the
`disposable loading unit.
` So that implies that the user has
`control over the actuation or the movement of
`that unit.
` Q. So it's the user's control over
`the actuation or the movement that makes it a
`selective movement?
` A. I'm saying that the fact that the
`user has control over that movement means they
`are selectively controlling it.
` Q. Let's turn to Page 121 of the Word
`document. It's 134 in the small number at the
`bottom. And this should be Section 6.8 or
`limitation 6.8 of the '058 patent starting with
`Paragraph 227.
` Are we in the same place?
` A. Yes, I'm there now.
` Q. So this is a somewhat long
`limitation, but among the elements of the
`limitation is "an electric motor operably
`interfacing with said rotary shaft to
`selectively apply said rotary motion."
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.025
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Here it's saying "selectively
`apply." What does "selectively" mean here?
` A. So I refer to that limitation on
`the following page, Paragraph 229 of my
`declaration. If we read that paragraph, we
`say, "Hooven's" -- I'm going to refer to this
`prior art reference as Hooven. Referring to
`U.S. -- referring to Exhibit IS1004, I refer to
`that as Hooven, H-o-o-v-e-n.
` Referring to Paragraph 229 of my
`declaration, "Hooven's on/off switch 48, switch
`49, firing button, and controller 31
`selectively control the power supply being
`provided by the motor, which applies rotary
`motion to the rotary shaft."
` Q. So the limitation in the header at
`the top of the page is to selectively apply
`said rotary motion, and in the section you read
`it says that those elements, the on/off switch,
`the switch, the firing button and controller,
`selectively control the power supplier being
`provided by the motor.
` How is that selectively applying
`said rotary motion?
` A. If you would like me to continue
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.026
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`in that paragraph, we conclude that sentence
`"which applies rotary motion to the rotary
`shaft (i.e., the combination of drive shaft 47,
`axially flexible shaft, torsionally stiff shaft
`61 and threaded rod 71)."
` Then if we go to Column 4, Lines
`60 on the Hooven reference, "Also included in
`the handle and interconnected with the DC motor
`are a suitable on/off switch 48 and a switch 49
`to control the power supply being provided to
`the motor."
` In that same column, Lines 22 to
`26, "The controller may feed appropriate
`signals back to the instrument in order to
`operate the instrument. The controller also
`acts to supply power to the instrument at the
`appropriate level, frequency, timing, et
`cetera."
` Going to Column 8, Lines 59 to 65,
`"The controller is microprocessor based and
`includes circuits for sensing, motor control
`... and power supply. The instrument includes
`miniature sensors to detect the power and/or
`force being used and limit switches and
`contacts to turn the motor on and off at
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Ethicon Exhibit 2007.027
`Intuitive v. Ethicon
`IPR2018-00935
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00933; IPR2018-00934; IPR2018-00935
`Fischer, Ph.D., Gregory
`February 18, 2019
`
`28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`predetermined positions."
` Thus getting back to your
`question, the switches are very clearly used to
`control power to the motor.
` Q. So I see that the switches and the
`buttons are used, in your words, to
`"selectively control the power supply being
`provided by the motor." Actually, let's take a
`moment there.
` Is the power supply being provided
`by the motor? I'm just reading from the second
`line of Paragraph 229.
` A. I'd like to clarify exactly the
`terminology in the context here. But we say
`that the controller acts as a power supply to
`the instrument, and then the instrument
`includes a motor.
` Q. So just so I understand your
`opinion, in the second line of Paragraph 229,
`should that read "selectively control the power
`supply being provided to the motor" or should
`it read "provided by the motor"?
` A. I would need to take a look at the
`Hooven reference to understand exactly what
`these items are referring to.
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hender

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket