throbber

`
`PCT
`
`WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION
`International Bureau
`
`
`1 May 1997 (01.05.97)
`G11B 23/107 (43) International Publication Date:
`
`INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
`(51) International PatentClassification © :
`(11) International Publication Number:
`WO 97/15925
`
`PCT/US96/16434|(81) Designated States: CN, DE,JP.
`(21) International Application Number:
`
`:
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`(22) International Filing Date:
`
`16 October 1996 (16.10.96) Published
`With international search report.
`
`(30) Priority Data:
`08/548,706
`
`26 October 1995 (26.10.95)
`
`US
`
`(71) Applicant: IMATION CORP.[US/US]; 1 Imation Place, P.O.
`Box 64898, Saint Paul, MN 55164-0898 (US).
`
`(72) Inventor: MARTIN,Robert, C.; P.O, Box 64898, Saint Paul,
`MN 55164-0898 (US).
`
`(74) Agent: DENNIS, Charles, L., IJ, Imation Legal Affairs, P.O.
`Box 64898, Saint Paul, MN 55164-0898 (US).
`
`
`
`(54) Title: STRUCTURE TO LIMIT EDGE CREASING IN A SCATTER-WOUND CARTRIDGE
`
`10
`
`Ss
`
`SS)
`
`(57) Abstract
`
`Various structures are described to minimize tape edge creasing in a tape cartridge. Several structures prevent the flange from being
`pressed by the housing of the tape cartridge into the tape pack with sufficient force to crease the edges of any exposed tape strands. Use
`of various structures or alternative materials also can stiffen the flange, again reducing the likelihood of the flange deflecting into the tape
`pack.
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 1
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 1
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`AM
`AT
`AU
`BB
`BE
`BF
`
`FOR THE PURPOSES OF INFORMATION ONLY
`
`Codes used to identify States party to the PCT on the front pages of pamphlets publishing international
`applications under the PCT.
`
`Republic of Moldova Malawi
`
`Armenia
`Austria
`Australia
`Barbados
`Belgium
`Burkina Faso
`Bulgaria
`Benin
`Brazil
`Belarus
`Canada
`Central African Republic
`Congo
`Switzerland
`Cdte d'Ivoire
`Cameroon
`China
`Czechoslovakia
`Czech Republic
`Germany
`Denmark
`Estonia
`Spain
`Finland
`France
`Gabon
`
`United Kingdom
`Georgia
`Guinea
`Greece
`Hungary
`Ireland
`Italy
`Japan
`Kenya
`Kyrgystan
`Democratic People's Republic
`of Korea
`Republic of Korea
`Kazakhstan
`Liechtenstein
`Sri Lanka
`Liberia
`Lithuania
`Luxembourg
`Latvia
`Monaco
`
`Mexico
`Niger
`Netherlands
`Norway
`New Zealand
`Poland
`Portugal
`Romania
`Russian Federation
`Sudan
`Sweden
`Singapore
`Slovenia
`Slovakia
`Senegal
`Swaziland
`Chad
`Tago
`Tajikistan
`Trinidad and Tobago
`Ukraine
`Uganda
`United States of America
`Uzbekistan
`Viet Nam
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 2
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 2
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`WO 97/15925
`
`PCT/US96/16434
`
`STRUCTURE TO LIMIT EDGE CREASING
`IN A SCATTER-WOUND CARTRIDGE
`
`Backgroundof the Invention
`
`Field of the Invention
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`The present invention relates to support mechanismsfor tape in a
`tape cartridge, and in particular, to structures for supporting scatter-wound
`
`tape packs.
`
`Description of the Related Art
`
`The tape in many types of tape cartridges winds into a tape pack
`about the tape spool such that someportions of the tape project above or
`below the main body of thetape pack. This type of winding is called
`scatter-wound,as distinct from the smoother winding (with better alignment
`from one piece of tape to the next) found in some cartridges using belts or
`the like to assist in packing.
`
`The tape spool in a 3480-style tape cartridge such as that shown in
`
`European Published Patent Application 0 588 219 (Martin et al.) is free to
`float within the cavity created by the base and cover. The only restraint
`against such motionis the low restraining force of a spring biasing a brake
`into engagement with the spool. However, during shipping and handling
`the inertia of the tape pack can easily overcome the force of the brake
`spring, causing the tape spool to contact the inner walls of the cavity. This
`contact can force the spoolflanges to deflect into the tape pack, thereby
`creasing the edges of any tape strand which protrudes from the pack.
`Creasesin the tape can result in high error counts on the edge tracks of
`the tape and the like. Evenfairly routine shipping and handling of the
`
`cartridge can develop this probiem.
`
`30
`
`This problem is usually most significant for the upper flange
`because the spool normallyis biased toward the bottom of the cartridge
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 3
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 3
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`WO 97/15925
`
`PCT/US96/16434
`
`housing. This meansthatit alreadyis resting flat against the bottom, so
`any forces tend to be evenly distributed over the entire lower flange. Thus,
`the lowerflangeis notlikely to be significantly bent or distortedif the
`cartridge is struck on the bottom.
`In contrast, the gap between the top of
`the spool and the coverallows the spool to be thrown against the cover,
`and,in particular, to be thrown against the coverat varying angles. This
`meansthatthe outer diameterof the flange maybe the only part of the
`spool contacting the cover. Since the flange is a cantilever beam,a force
`applied only to the outer diameter deflects the flange much more than a
`force applied to the inner diameteror the entire flange. This deflection
`causestheflange to press against the tape pack, potentially creasing the
`edge of any tape strand(s) projecting above the main bodyofthe tape
`pack.
`
`Efforts have been madetolimit the amount of tape which can
`protrude from the tape pack bytightly controlling the spacing and taper of
`the spool flanges. The effectivenessof this approach has been limited by
`the molding and assembly tolerances encountered during manufacture of
`the spool and assembly of the drive. As a consequence ofthis, some past
`spool designs allow tapes to become creased within the recording part of
`the tape, thus resulting in high error counts.
`
`Summary of the Invention
`The present invention significantly reduces creasing by modifying
`the tape spool or coverto limit contact between the flange and the
`cartridge cover. A ring or ridge of material is added to the upper surface of
`the flange nearits inner diameter.
`If the cartridge is bumped, causing the
`spool move toward the cover, this ring will define the primary line of
`contact of the spool with the inner surface of the cover. Preferably, the
`height of the ring is such that only the ring will contact the cover. However,
`it is acceptable for the very outer diameterof the flange to also contact,
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`-2-
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 4
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 4
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`
`
`WO 97/15925
`
`PCT/US96/16434
`
`provided the geometry is such that the outer diameteris not significantly
`
`deflected by the contact. As a result, the inner surface of the flange will
`
`not be deflected into the tape pack.
`
`The ring or ridge preferably is placed close to the inner diameter of
`
`the flange. This provides the maximum transfer of force directly to the
`
`spool hub, with the minimum deflection of the flange.
`
`Alternatively, a ring or ridge of material can be added to the coverof
`
`the tape cartridge instead of or in addition to the ring on the flange.
`
`According to another embodimentof the invention, the upperflange
`
`10
`
`is madestiffer to resist deflection into the tape pack. One methodis to
`
`make the flange out of a material with a higher flexural modulus, such as
`
`glass reinforced material. Another methodis to provide the flange with
`
`radial ribs which resist deflection.
`
`Aswill be apparent, these various embodiments are not mutually
`
`15
`
`exclusive, and can be combined asdesired to achieve the desired effect,
`
`which is preventing the flange from creasing the tape edges projecting
`
`from the main body of the tape pack.
`
`Brief Description of the Drawings
`
`20
`
`Fig. 1 is a partial cross-section of a cartridge accordingto a first
`
`embodimentof the invention.
`
`Fig. 2 is a partial cross-section of a cartridge according to a second
`
`embodimentof the invention.
`
`Fig. 3 is a partial cross-section of a cartridge accordingto a third
`
`25
`
`embodiment of the invention.
`
`Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
`
`Fig. 1 depicts a cartridge 10 with a cover 12 and a base 14 defining
`
`a cavity 15 therebetweenin which a tape spool 16 is rotatably mounted. A
`
`30
`
`brake 18 also is positioned in the cavity 15 and is biased by a brake spring
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p.5
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 5
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`WO 97/15925
`
`PCT/US96/16434
`
`In
`
`20 toward the spool hub 21. Whenpositioned in a drive, the drive would
`push the brake 18 awayfrom the spool hub 21 (as shown in the drawing
`for clarity). When notin a drive, the brake spring 20 would bias the brake
`teeth 22 into engagementwith the spool teeth 24, thereby preventing
`rotation of the spool 16.
`The spool16 includes a lowerflange 26 and an upperflange 28.
`use, tape (shown schematically at 29) would be wound around the spool
`16 between the lower and upperflanges 26, 28. The spool 16 may be
`formed as a single piece (as shown in Fig. 1), or, more conveniently, in
`multiple pieces, as shown,e.g., in European Published Patent Application
`0 588 219 (Martin et al.).
`According to the current invention, a ring 30 is provided on the
`upper surface of the upperflange 28 nearthe center thereof.
`If the
`cartridge is dropped or otherwise impacted and the spool16 is displaced
`toward the top cover 12, the ring 30will engage the cover 12. Preferably,
`the height and radial position of the ring 30 are such that only the ring will
`contact the cover. However,it is acceptable for the very outer diameterof
`the upperflange 28 to also contact, provided the geometry is such that the
`upperflange 28is notsignificantly deflected by the contact. The upper
`flange 28 therefore will not press against the tape pack 29.
`A droptest can be useful in determining the appropriate height and
`radial position for the ring 30. To usethis test, the height and radial
`position of the ring 30 should be such that the cartridge 10 can be dropped
`from a predetermined height, e.g., about 1.5 m, andstill prevent the flange
`from deflecting into the tape pack with sufficient force to crease the edges
`of any exposed tape strands.
`Fig. 2 depicts a cartridge which is substantially the same as that
`depictedin Fig. 1 and therefore will not be describedin detail. The
`difference between Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 is the location of the ring 30.
`In Fig.
`2, a ring 30'is positioned on the cover 12' abovethe central portion of the
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`4.
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 6
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 6
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`WO 97/15925
`
`PCT/US96/16434
`
`spool 16'. This ring 30' will interact with the upper portion of the spool 16'
`
`in much the same fashion asthe ring 30 to prevent the flange 28’ from
`
`pressing against the tape pack 29’.
`
`Fig. 3 depicts a third embodiment according to the present
`
`invention. Again, most of the elements are substantially the same as those
`
`shown in Fig. 1 and will not be describedin detail.
`
`In the embodiment of
`
`Fig. 3, however, instead of a ring 30, a radially extending rib 32 is provided
`
`on the upperflange 28". A plurality of these ribs 32 distributed around the
`
`spool 16"stiffen the upper flange 28". As a result, this added stiffnesswill
`
`10
`
`prevent upperflange 28" from pressing against the tape pack 29”. Note
`
`that the rib 32 is shown onthe right side of the drawing and not ontheleft
`
`becausethe ribs 32 may not necessarily be along the same diameter
`
`across the spool 16".
`
`in addition to or instead of using a ring 30, 30' or ribs 32, the upper
`
`15
`
`flange 28 may be formedof a material having a higherflexural modulus.
`
`For example, the material could be a glass reinforced material. Such a
`
`material currently is used with someregularity in forming the lowerflange
`
`26, @.g., as taught in European Published Patent Application 0 588 219
`
`(Martin et al.), so one skilled in the art will be familiar with how to form a
`
`20
`
`flange of such material.
`
`It will be understood by oneskilled in the art that any orall of the
`
`various embodiments described above could be combined. For example,it
`
`would be perfectly possible to have a ring on both the upper cover and the
`
`top of the flange, as well as to have both a ring and ribs. The rings 30, 30’
`
`25
`
`and rib 32 also can be molded as part of the upper flange 28, 28’, 28”, or
`
`can be added thereto, as convenient for manufacturing. Finally, any of
`
`these could be combined with a stiffer modulus material.
`
`With all of these alternative embodiments and materials, the drop
`
`test described in connection with the first embodiment can be used to set a
`
`30
`
`useful guide for the necessary height, position and/orstiffness.
`
`-5-
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 7
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 7
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`WO 97/15925
`
`PCT/US96/16434
`
`it will be understood that these exemplary embodimentsin no way
`limit the scope of the invention. Other modifications of the invention will be
`apparentto thoseskilled in the art in view of the foregoing description.
`These descriptions are intended to provide specific examples of
`embodiments which clearly disclose the presentinvention. Accordingly,
`the invention is notlimited to the described embodiments orto the use of
`specific elements, dimensions, materials or configurations contained
`therein. All alternative modifications and variations of the present
`invention which fall within the spirit and scope of the appendedclaims are
`covered.
`
`10
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 8
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 8
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`WO 97/15925
`
`| Claim:
`
`1.
`
`A tape cartridge having:
`
`PCT/US96/16434
`
`a)
`
`b)
`
`c)
`
`a housing defining a cavity therein;
`
`a spool having a central hub, and twoflanges; and
`
`tape wound on the spool betweenthe flanges to form a tape
`
`pack;
`
`characterized in that an abutmentstructure is formed on at least the
`
`housing or oneflange, the abutment structure being of a height and
`
`radial position such thatit does not interfere with operation of the
`
`10
`
`spool in normaluse, butif the cartridge is dropped from a
`
`predetermined height, the abutment structure will contact the
`
`opposing flange or housing to substantially prevent the flange from
`
`being deflected by the housing into the tape pack with sufficient
`
`force to crease the edge of any tape strands projecting beyond the
`
`15
`
`main body of the tape pack.
`
`The tape cartridge of claim 1, further characterized in that the
`
`abutmentstructure comprises a ring.
`The tape cartridge of claim 2, further characterizedin that the ringis
`formed on a surface of the spool near the center of the flange.
`
`20
`
`The tape cartridge of claims 2 or 3, further characterized in that the
`
`ring is formed on an inner surface of the housing adjacentto the
`
`central portion of the flange.
`
`The tape cartridge of any of claims 1-4, further characterized in that
`
`the abutment structure is formed on both the housing and one
`
`25
`
`flange.
`
`The tape cartridge of claim 5, further characterized in that the
`
`abutment structure on the housing aligns with the abutment
`
`structure on the flange.
`
`-7-
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p.9
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 9
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`WO 97/15925
`
`PCT/US96/16434
`
`A tape cartridge having:
`a)
`a housing defining a cavity therein;
`b)
`@ spool having a central hub and an upper and a lower
`flange; and
`tape wound onthe spool betweentheflanges;
`c)
`characterized in that the upperflangeis stiffened by stiffening
`means enoughthatif the cartridge is dropped from a predetermined
`height and the flange contacts the housing, the housing will not
`deflect the flange into the tape pack with sufficient force to crease
`the edgeof any tape strands projecting beyond the main body of the
`tape pack.
`
`The tape cartridge of any of claims 1-7, further characterizedin that
`the upperflangeis stiffened by being formed of materials having a
`sufficiently high flexural modulus to make the flangesufficiently stiff
`to prevent the deflection.
`
`The tape cartridge of any of claims 1-8, further characterizedin that
`the upperflange is stiffened by forming a plurality of radially
`extending ribs on an uppersurface of the upperflange,the ribs
`being of a sufficient thickness to stiffen the upper flange sufficiently
`to prevent the deflection.
`
`10.
`
`The tape cartridge of any of claims 1-9, further characterized in that
`the upperflange is formed of a glass reinforced material.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 10
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 10
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`WO 97/15925
`
`PCT/US96/16434
`
`1/1
`
`aSBZANANAAAN
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 11
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 11
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
`
`tna”
`
`wal Appticauon No
`
`11B23/10
`
`According to International Patent Classification (IPC) or to both national classification and [PC
`B. FIELDS SEARCHED
`Minimum documentation searched (classification system followed by classificakon symbols)
`IPC 6
`G1iB
`
`Documentation searched other than minimum documentation to the extent that such documents are included in the fields searched
`
`Electronic data base consulted during the internatonal search (name of data base and, where practical, search terms used)
`
`C. DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED TO BE RELEVANT
`
`Citation of document, with indication, where appropniate, of the relevant passages
`
`Relevant to claum No.
`
`EP,A,0 588 219 (MINNESOTA MINING & MFG
`sSTORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORP (US)} 23 March
`1994
`cited in the application
`see column 5,
`line 12 - column 6,
`
`line 34
`
`1,7
`
`US,A,3 987 489 (SCHOETTLE KLAUS ET AL) 19
`October 1976
`see column 4,
`
`line 47 -
`
`line 64
`
`US,A,3 836 096 (FUKUSHIMA J ET AL) 17
`September 1974
`see column 5,
`
`line 29 -
`
`PCT/US 96/16434 A. 6eTIB23OFSiov MATTER
`
`* Special categories of ated documents :
`Pe
`e
`.
`document defining the genera! state of the art which is not
`dered to be of
`cular relevance
`” earlier document but published on or after the international
`filing date
`. document which mayanewdoubts on pronty claims) or
`h
`is ited to establish
`the publication
`date of another
`citation or other special reason (as specified)
`" document referring to an oral disclosure, use, exhibition or
`other means
`P” document published prior to the international filing date but
`later than the pnority date claimed
`Date of the actual completion of the international search
`
`line 64
`
`US,A,3 857 531 (JANTZEN J) 31 December
`1974
`see colum 3,
`
`line 11 -
`
`line 17
`
`later documentpublished after the internatonal filing date
`or prionty date and not in conflict with the applicagon but
`Citedfounderstand the principle or theory underlying the
`documentof particular relevance; the claimed invention
`cannot be considered novel or cannot be considered to
`involve an inventive step when the document is taken alone
`documentof particular relevance; the claimed invention
`cannot be considered to involve an inventive step when the
`document is combined with one or more other such docu-
`ments, such combination beng obvious to a person skilled
`in the art.
`document member of the same patent family
`Date of mailing of the internanonal search report
`
`"&°
`
`17 January 1997
`Name and mailing address of the ISA
`European Patent Office, P.B. 5818 Patentlaan 2
`NL - 2280 HV Rijswijk
`Tel. (+ U-70) 340-2040, Tx. 31 651 epo nl,
`Fasc (+ 31-70) 340-3016
`Form PCTASA/210 (second theet) {July 1992)
`
`28.01.97
`Authonized officer
`
`Ressenaar, J-P
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 12
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 12
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
`«aformation on patent family members
`
`
`
`Inter
`nal Applicaton No
`PCT/US 96/16434
`
`
`
`Patent document
`cited in search report
`
`Publication
`date
`
`member(s)
`
`date
`
`
`18-04-74
`
`02-05-74
`03-12-75
`03-12-75
`05-06-73
`03-10-74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`23-03-94
`EP-A-0588219
`15-03-94
`2105116
`CA-A-
`
`07-10-94
`6282960
`JP-A-
` 980317
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DE-A-
`DE-A-
`GB-A-
`GB-A-
`NL-A,B
`AU-B-
`
`2264553
`2264555
`1416744
`1416743
`7216248
`453571
`4948372
`
`Fosm PCT/ISA/210 (patent family annex) (July 1992)
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 13
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2017, p. 13
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket