`Patent No. 9,492,392 B2
`Request for Refund of Post-Institution Fees
`Attorney Docket No. KASHIV 7.1R-004
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________
`
`KASHIV PHARMA, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`PURDUE PHARMA L.P.,
`THE P.F. LABORATORIES, INC., and
`PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS L.P.,
`Patent Owners.
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2018-00625
`U.S. Patent No. 9,492,392 B2
`_____________________
`
`
`REQUEST FOR REFUND OF POST-INSTITUTION FEES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`i
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00625 (Patent No. 9,492,392 B2)
`Request for Refund of Post-Institution Fees
`
`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Petitioner Kashiv Pharma, LLC respectfully requests a refund of $16,200,
`
`the post-institution fee paid for the Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 9,492,392 (“the ’392 Patent”), assigned case number IPR2018-00625. A
`
`refund is appropriate because, prior to any institution decision from the Board, the
`
`Board granted the parties’ Joint Motion to Terminate and terminated the
`
`proceeding. (Paper No. 24.)
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`On February 27, 2018, Petitioner filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`
`the ’392 Patent. (Paper No. 1.) On June 22, 2018, Patent Owners filed a Patent
`
`Owner Preliminary Response. (Paper No. 15.)
`
`On August 9, 2018, pursuant to the Board’s authorization, the parties filed a
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate Pursuant To 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5,
`
`42.71(a), 42.72, and 42.74. (Paper No. 22.) On August 21, 2018, the Board granted
`
`the joint motion and terminated the proceeding. (Paper No. 24.)
`
`Because the proceeding was terminated prior to institution, Petitioner hereby
`
`requests a refund of $16,200, the full amount of the post-institution fee paid by
`
`Petitioner. Payment of the fee was processed through Financial Manager, and
`
`posted to Deposit Account No. 12-1095 on February 27, 2018.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00625 (Patent No. 9,492,392 B2)
`Request for Refund of Post-Institution Fees
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`
`Upon review and approval of this request, Petitioners respectfully request
`
`that the Board credit the $16,200 post-institution fee to Deposit Account
`
`No. 12-1095.
`
`Dated: August 29, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5573344_1.docx
`
`Respectively submitted,
`
`By: s/ Tedd Van Buskirk /
`Tedd W. Van Buskirk
`Reg. No. 46,282
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00625 (Patent No. 9,492,392 B2)
`Request for Refund of Post-Institution Fees
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned hereby certifies that a copy
`
`of the foregoing REQUEST FOR REFUND OF POST-INSTITUTION FEES
`
`was served in its entirety by filing these documents through the PTAB E2E System
`
`as well as by e-mail to the following counsel of record on August 29, 2018:
`
`VIA E-MAIL
`Gasper J. LaRosa, Esq. (gjlarosa@jonesday.com)
`Kelsey I. Nix, Esq. (knix@jonesday.com)
`Pablo D. Hendler, Esq. (phendler@jonesday.com)
`Kenneth S. Canfeld, Esq. (kcanfield@jonesday.com)
`Sarah A. Geers, Esq. (sgeers@jonesday.com)
`Christopher J. Harnett, Esq. (charnett@jonesday.com)
`Lisamarie LoGiudice, Esq. (llogiudice@jonesday.com)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 29, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5573344_1.docx
`
`By: s/ Tedd Van Buskirk /
`Tedd W. Van Buskirk
`Reg. No. 46,282
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
