throbber
Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 100 (2010) S65–S71
`
`Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
`
`Molecular Genetics and Metabolism
`
`j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s ev i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / y m g m e
`
`Minireview
`Nitrogen sparing therapy revisited 2009
`
`Gregory M. Enns *
`
`Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, H-315, Stanford, CA 94305-5208, USA
`
`a r t i c l e
`
`i n f o
`
`a b s t r a c t
`
`Article history:
`Received 4 January 2010
`Accepted 8 February 2010
`Available online 13 February 2010
`
`Keywords:
`Hyperammonemia
`Urea cycle disorders
`Alternative pathway therapy
`Survival
`Outcome
`
`Although the protocol that most experienced metabolic centers in the United States follow for treating
`acute hyperammonemia in urea cycle disorders (UCDs) is similar to that proposed by Brusilow and Bat-
`shaw in the early 1980s, over the years a steady evolution has taken place. Continued developments in
`intensive care, surgical and hemodialysis techniques, fluid and electrolyte management, cardiovascular
`support, and emergency transport have contributed to improved management of acute hyperammone-
`mia. Compared to historical data, survival of urea cycle patients has also improved following treatment
`with alternative pathway therapy, in addition to appropriate supportive care, including the provision of
`adequate calories to prevent catabolism and promote anabolism and hemodialysis if needed. However,
`overall neurological outcomes have been suboptimal. There are currently a number of exciting prospec-
`tive new therapies on the horizon, including novel medications or cell-based treatments. Nevertheless,
`the therapeutic expertise that is currently in place at centers specializing in management of metabolic
`emergencies already has the potential to improve survival and outcome in these children significantly.
`The early identification of UCD patients so that transport to a metabolic treatment center may be carried
`out without delay continues to be a major area of focus and challenge.
`Ó 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
`
`Acute hyperammonemia in urea cycle disorders (UCDs) is a
`medical emergency that requires rapid institution of multiple
`treatment modalities, including intravenous ‘‘nitrogen-scaveng-
`ing” medications, provision of adequate calories to prevent catab-
`olism (block production of endogenous ammonium) and promote
`anabolism, and hemodialysis, in order to treat effectively [1]. His-
`torically, mortality and morbidity associated with UCDs have been
`high, with survivors often exhibiting devastating neurological se-
`quelae [2]. Alternative pathway therapy has revolutionized the
`acute and chronic treatment of patients who have UCDs. UCD pa-
`tients have improved survival following therapy with alternative
`pathway therapy [3], but overall neurological outcomes have been
`suboptimal [4,5]. After touching on initial clinical trials using
`alternative pathway therapy, this review concentrates on current
`therapeutic strategies for management of acute and chronic hyper-
`ammonemia secondary to UCDs, as well as newer developments
`that have the potential to improve survival and neurological
`outcome.
`
`Abbreviations: AL, argininosuccinate lyase; AS, argininosuccinate synthetase;
`ASA, argininosuccinic acid; AUC, area under the time concentration curve; CPSI,
`carbamyl phosphate synthetase I; OTC, ornithine transcarbamylase; PA, phenylac-
`etate; PAGN, phenylacetylglutamine; PB, phenylbutyrate; UCD, urea cycle
`disorder.
`* Fax: +1 650 498 4555.
`E-mail address: greg.enns@stanford.edu
`
`1096-7192/$ - see front matter Ó 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
`doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.02.007
`
`Initial studies
`
`In 1979, Brusilow et al. suggested that patients who have UCDs
`may benefit if the synthesis of non-urea nitrogen-containing
`metabolites whose excretion rates are high could be promoted [6].
`The two main classes of compounds that could utilize alternative
`mechanisms of waste nitrogen disposal are (i) the urea cycle inter-
`mediates arginine and citrulline, and (ii) the amino acid acylation
`products hippuric acid and phenylacetylglutamine (PAGN) [7].
`Brusilow and Batshaw first demonstrated the potential of alter-
`native pathway therapy in two neonates with argininosuccinate
`lyase (AL) deficiency [8]. They hypothesized that argininosuccinic
`acid (ASA) might serve as a vehicle for the excretion of waste nitro-
`gen in patients with AL deficiency. ASA contains two waste nitro-
`gen atoms and has a renal clearance similar to the glomerular
`filtration rate. Because of the location of the enzymatic deficiency
`in AL deficiency, excess arginine would promote ASA synthesis
`and, hence, increased waste nitrogen excretion. Indeed, intrave-
`nous arginine therapy, in combination with peritoneal dialysis in
`one of the patients, resulted in a fall of plasma ammonium and glu-
`tamine to normal [8]. In essence, ASA served as a ‘large urea’
`molecule.
`Soon thereafter, the potential for amino acid acylation products
`to provide a mechanism for the synthesis and excretion of waste
`nitrogen was demonstrated in a teenager with carbamyl phosphate
`synthetase I (CPS I) deficiency and four additional patients in
`
`Horizon Exhibit 2009
`Lupin v. Horizon
`IPR2018-00459
`
`1 of 7
`
`

`

`S66
`
`G.M. Enns / Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 100 (2010) S65–S71
`
`hyperammonemic coma [9]. Treatment with sodium benzoate or
`phenylacetate (PA) resulted in increased urinary nitrogen excre-
`tion and clinical improvement with decreased plasma ammonium
`levels. Hippurate and PAGN, amino acylation products of benzoate
`and PA respectively, were found to account for the increase in uri-
`nary nitrogen [9]. Larger trials confirmed the initial findings.
`Twenty-six infants with urea cycle disorders were treated with
`intravenous benzoate and arginine hydrochloride for periods of
`time ranging from 7 to 62 months. The majority (23/26) also
`underwent peritoneal dialysis. Chronic management consisted of
`sodium benzoate supplementation, a low-protein diet, and provi-
`sion of adequate calories. Overall, 85% (22/26) of the patients sur-
`vived, but neurological impairment was common with 59% (13/22)
`demonstrating normal intelligence [10]. In 1984, Brusilow et al.
`described the response of seven further children with UCDs and
`moderate hyperammonemia (plasma ammonium levels 101–483
`lmol/L) who were treated with a protocol similar to the one still
`in use today. Intravenous sodium benzoate, sodium PA and argi-
`nine hydrochloride were used for treating 12 acute hyperammone-
`mic episodes
`in these children.
`In addition, nitrogen-free
`intravenous fluids containing 10% dextrose were used to provide
`caloric support (at least 40 kcal/kg/day). Two patients had rebound
`hyperammonemia within 7 h after their initial response to therapy
`and required peritoneal dialysis. One patient died despite therapy,
`but the others recovered following the use of this regimen [11].
`
`Current acute management
`
`Hyperammonemia is a medical emergency that requires imme-
`diate, coordinated action by a trained multi-disciplinary team in
`order to deliver appropriate treatment without delay. Ideally, ther-
`apy should be provided by a specialized center with experience in
`treating acute hyperammonemia. Metabolic centers typically have
`a protocol in place that outlines each therapeutic intervention in
`detail. Placement of intravenous lines, preferably central, is essen-
`tial in order to provide adequate calories through the use of nitro-
`gen-free fluids containing dextrose (e.g. 10% dextrose with
`appropriate electrolytes initially) and intravenous lipids. In addi-
`tion, venous access allows for treatment with alternative pathway
`medications and other support, such as vasopressor agents or buf-
`fering agents, depending on the cardiovascular and acid–base sta-
`tus of the patient [1,12]. At Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital
`(LPCH), we now send our transport team out with the appropriate
`dose of sodium PA and sodium benzoate (AmmonulÒ) with added
`arginine hydrochloride so that a bolus infusion of these medica-
`tions can be delivered en route. Upon arrival at our center, or soon
`thereafter, a post-bolus plasma ammonium level may be checked
`in order to help guide the course of further therapy, especially
`the need for hemodialysis. Often hemodialysis, or at least prepara-
`tion for dialysis, is initiated concomitantly with AmmonulÒ and
`arginine therapy. Hemodialysis (HD) has a very high ammonium
`clearance rate, as compared with other methods such as peritoneal
`dialysis or hemofiltration (HF) [13–15]. Following conventional
`hemodialysis, institution of hemofiltration may prevent rebound
`hyperammonemia [16]. Both sodium PA and sodium benzoate ex-
`hibit high clearance by HD and HF, but this typically does not inter-
`fere with resolution of hyperammonemia [16]. Use of a high-flow
`extracorporeal oxygenation (ECMO) circuit to support HD has also
`been used successfully in neonates with hyperammonemia. The
`addition of the ECMO circuit may further increase ammonium
`clearance while simultaneously improving oxygenation [17].
`The importance of providing calories to prevent catabolism and
`promote anabolism cannot be stressed too highly. A goal of at least
`80 kcal/kg/day is often used in neonates [7], although a higher
`caloric intake (e.g. 120 kcal/kg/day) may be required. We com-
`monly use intravenous fluids with a dextrose concentration of
`
`20% in addition to intravenous lipids (2–3 g/kg/day) in order to
`achieve this caloric goal. An insulin drip may be needed to control
`blood glucose levels. Other supportive care includes intubation and
`ventilation as necessary, correction of anemia, electrolyte and acid/
`base imbalances, maintenance of blood pressure, and treatment of
`any intercurrent illness [1].
`Complete restriction of protein is also a mainstay of acute therapy,
`although this should be limited to only about 24 h after the initiation
`of treatment. Thereafter, protein supplementation is provided via
`parenteral nutrition or nasogastric feeds. In general, transition to ent-
`eral feeds should be done as early as possible. If protein restriction is
`prolonged, depletion of essential amino acids will occur with resul-
`tant further protein catabolism and nitrogen release [1].
`
`Outcome following acute management
`
`In 2005, Nassogne et al. published a report describing the out-
`come of a large cohort of urea cycle patients who were not treated
`using alternative pathway medications [18]. Between 1972 and
`2000, 217 patients were diagnosed with a UCD; 121 had neonatal-
`onset disease and 96 had late-onset disease. Overall, outcome was
`poor with mortality reaching 84% (60% if males with OTC deficiency
`are excluded) in neonatal-onset cases and 28% in those who had
`late-onset forms of disease. There was a high risk of neurological
`impairment in survivors [18]. During the period of study, intrave-
`nous AmmonulÒ and arginine therapy were not readily available
`in Europe. A difference in philosophy regarding the treatment of pa-
`tients in hyperammonemic crisis, compared to some centers in the
`United States, may also have played a role in the choice of manage-
`ment for the UCD patients described in this report. In addition, there
`may have been delays in transporting hyperammonemic patients to
`experienced metabolic centers. The possibility of permanent brain
`damage is high in such cases, so urgent intervention is less likely
`to lead to good outcome, and, therefore, less likely to be used.
`In contrast, an open-label, uncontrolled, non-randomized clini-
`cal trial of AmmonulÒ and arginine hydrochloride therapy was per-
`formed in 118 hospitals in the United States and Canada from
`August, 1980 to March, 2005 [3]. Treating physicians were self-se-
`lected. To enroll a patient, the investigator contacted Dr. Brusilow
`at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (from 1982 to 1996) or Ucyc-
`lyd Pharma (from 1997 to 2005). During the 25-year period of
`study, 299 urea cycle patients (93 neonates, 237 patients >30 days
`old, including 31 who were treated both as neonates and later)
`were followed. In total, they sustained 1181 episodes of hyperam-
`monemia. The recommended use of alternative pathway therapy
`for this study was similar to the initial treatment protocol pro-
`posed by Brusilow and Batshaw [11]. Neonates and young children
`(weighing up to 20 kg) with CPS I deficiency, ornithine transcar-
`bamylase (OTC) deficiency, and argininosuccinate synthetase (AS)
`deficiency were treated with an intravenous loading dose of
`250 mg/kg AmmonulÒ over a period of 90–120 min. Older children
`and adults (weighing >20 kg) were treated with an intravenous
`loading dose of AmmonulÒ at 5.5 g/m2 or 250 mg/kg over a period
`of 90–120 min. After the loading dose, maintenance infusions of
`the same dose over 24 h were continued until the patient was no
`longer hyperammonemic and oral therapy could be tolerated. Spe-
`cific guidelines for administering sodium PA and sodium benzoate
`were not given for treatment of AL deficiency or arginase defi-
`ciency. Loading and maintenance infusions also contained arginine.
`Dialysis was recommended for any neonate with hyperammone-
`mic encephalopathy or any other patient whose ammonium level
`did not decrease substantially within 8 h after the load infusion [3].
`Overall patient survival was 84% (250 of 299 patients), while
`hyperammonemic episode survival was 96% (1132 of 1181 epi-
`sodes). The episode survival rate was lowest (91%) for males with
`OTC deficiency. The mean number of episodes per patient was
`
`2 of 7
`
`

`

`G.M. Enns / Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 100 (2010) S65–S71
`
`S67
`
`3.3 ± 6.3 (range 1–79). Patients >30 days old were more likely to
`survive a hyperammonemic episode compared to neonates (sur-
`vival rates 98% and 73%, respectively, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1). Patients
`>12 years old were most likely to survive a hyperammonemic epi-
`sode (survival rate 99%, P < 0.001 vs. all other age groups). Among
`patients who were comatose on admission, no coma was present at
`the time of discharge in 97 episodes (81%) while 23 episodes re-
`sulted in death (19%). Survival of hyperammonemic episodes was
`lowest for males with OTC deficiency who were comatose on
`admission (68%). Survival was significantly improved for patients
`who had episodes with a peak plasma ammonium level
`6500 lmol/L compared to those with higher peak ammonium lev-
`els (P < 0.001). Patients <30 days old with a peak ammonium level
`>1000 lmol/L were least likely to survive a hyperammonemic epi-
`sode (38% episode survival) (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2). Dialysis (including
`standard hemodialysis, various combinations of arteriovenous and
`venovenous hemofiltration, and peritoneal dialysis) was used in
`136 of 1181 episodes (12%) and in 105 of 299 patients (35%). Dial-
`ysis was used more commonly in neonates (60% of episodes) than
`in older patients (7% of episodes) [3].
`Most patients experienced adverse events while being treated
`for hyperammonemia; metabolism, nervous system, and respira-
`tory disorders were most frequently reported. Co-morbid features
`were common in patients who died, including seizures (19/49),
`infection (18/49), cerebral edema or increased intracranial pres-
`sure (16/49), disseminated intravascular coagulation (9/49), kid-
`ney failure (6/49), multi-organ system failure (5/49), and cerebral
`hemorrhage (5/49). Although cerebral edema or increased intra-
`cranial pressure was documented in only 16 of 49 death narratives,
`these patients had markedly elevated ammonium levels, so cere-
`bral edema was likely present in nearly all cases. An overdose of
`AmmonulÒ was reported in 13 patients who died. Massive over-
`dose was uncommon, being noted in two episodes (doses between
`9 and 17 times the recommended dose of AmmonulÒ were given in
`these instances). It is likely that the instances of mild overdosing
`(e.g. one or two additional bolus infusions given over several days)
`reflected the severity of the hyperammonemic episode and poor
`clinical status of patients who eventually died [3].
`Survival was clearly improved, compared to historical data, fol-
`lowing treatment with alternative pathway therapy, in addition to
`the provision of appropriate nutrition and, in some cases, dialysis
`
`Fig. 2. Hyperammonemic episodes survived according to peak ammonium levels.
`Patient survival of hyperammonemic episodes depends on peak plasma ammonium
`level, with significantly improved survival for those with peak plasma ammonium
`levels of 500 lM or less (P < 0.001) [3]. Reproduced with permission from Enns
`et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 356(22) (2007) 2282–2292. CopyrightÓ 2007 Massachusestts
`Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`[3]. It must be stressed that alternative pathway therapy is only
`a single component of the coordinated therapeutic regimen neces-
`sary for optimal treatment of acute hyperammonemia. Because pa-
`tients were primarily treated in specialized metabolic centers, the
`high survival rate likely reflects, at least in part, the expertise avail-
`able at treating institutions. In addition, these survival statistics
`apply only to patients who received the study drug and may not
`necessarily extrapolate to all UCD patients. Some patients may
`not have been treated because of their poor condition on presenta-
`tion and others may have died before reaching the hospital.
`
`Longitudinal survival data
`
`Summar et al. reported longitudinal survival findings in 260
`UCD patients using a subset of the same database used in the study
`described above [19]. Hyperammonemia presenting in the neona-
`tal period was associated with the worst outcome; only 35% of pa-
`
`Fig. 1. Survival of episodes of hyperammonemia. Hyperammonemic episode survival is shown according to age, diagnosis, and comparison of first episode vs. recurrent
`episodes [3]. Reproduced with permission from Enns et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 356(22) (2007) 2282–2292. CopyrightÓ 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`3 of 7
`
`

`

`S68
`
`G.M. Enns / Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 100 (2010) S65–S71
`
`tients were still alive at the final follow-up time point (approxi-
`mately 11 years after the start of the study period). The great
`majority of deaths in this group (22/26) occurred before age
`2 months. In contrast, 87% of patients who presented later in in-
`fancy were alive at the final follow-up time point. Seventy-eight
`percent of patients presenting with hyperammonemia between
`ages 2 and 16 years survived to the final follow-up time point.
`When specific disorders were studied, males with OTC deficiency
`had the lowest survival (53%), compared to OTC females (74%),
`and those with CPS I deficiency (61%) and AS deficiency (78%) [19].
`
`The Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital experience
`
`Over the past decade, we have treated 25 neonates with hyper-
`ammonemia at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford; 11
`with UCDs, 12 with organic acidemias, and two with long-chain
`fatty acid oxidation defects. Hemodialysis, typically followed by a
`form of hemofiltration, was performed in most of the UCD patients
`(9/11, 82%) and in 58% of those with organic acidemias (7/12), but
`was not required in the fatty acid oxidation patients, even though
`both of these patients had significant hyperammonemia (600 to
`1000 lmol/L). There was one neonatal death (a girl who presented
`with seizures and was diagnosed with CPS I deficiency). Three UCD
`patients died later (two had severe OTC deficiency and the third
`was given a lethal overdose of BuphenylÒ by an outside institu-
`tion). Three organic acidemia patients also died during childhood
`(all three had methylmalonic acidemia mut0 subtype). Both fatty
`acid oxidation patients have survived to date. In this relatively
`small cohort of hyperammonemic patients, neonatal survival was
`96% and overall survival to date is 72%.
`
`Neurological outcomes
`
`Survival has clearly improved compared to historical outcomes
`following alternative pathway therapy, when these medications
`are administered as part of a multi-faceted therapeutic protocol.
`The goal, however, is not only survival, but also optimization of neu-
`rological outcome. Unfortunately, reported IQ data following sur-
`vival of an episode of neonatal hyperammonemic coma have been
`sobering. In 24 UCD children tested at ages 12–74 months following
`treatment with alternative pathway therapy, the mean IQ was
`43 ± 6, with only 21% having an IQ > 70 [4]. Moreover, 79% of pa-
`tients had at least one developmental disability. The depth of coma
`was found to correlate inversely with IQ, with patients with a his-
`tory of stage III or IV coma having the worst neurological outcome.
`Although prolonged hyperammonemic coma was found to be asso-
`ciated with brain damage and impaired intellectual function, the
`investigators speculated that poor outcomes may be prevented by
`early diagnosis and institution of appropriate therapy [4].
`
`Chronic therapy
`
`After the initial metabolic crisis has been treated, surviving pa-
`tients are started on a chronic therapeutic regimen. This consists of
`protein restriction (along with provision of approximately 50% of
`protein intake from an essential amino acid formula), supplemen-
`tation with citrulline or arginine depending on the precise diagno-
`sis, use of alternative pathway medications, and prompt
`recognition and treatment of any intercurrent illness [20]. The
`treatment regimen must be individualized. Many centers, includ-
`ing ours, initially administer BuphenylÒ (sodium phenylbutyrate)
`as the primary nitrogen-scavenging medication once AmmonulÒ
`has been stopped. In some cases, the addition of sodium benzoate
`may be required to help control hyperammonemia. The tendency
`to hyperammonemia may be controlled in other patients by using
`
`sodium benzoate alone, although in our experience this is usually
`possible only in the more mild forms of disease, such as manifest-
`ing heterozygote females with OTC deficiency.
`Poor adherence to the prescribed doses of alternative pathway
`medications has been a major difficulty in treating patients with
`urea cycle defects. BuphenylÒ requires frequent dosing and has
`an unpleasant taste and odor. Patients may be faced with taking
`up to 40 large tablets of BuphenylÒ daily in order to manage their
`underlying disease. Some patients may prefer sodium benzoate,
`although this medication also has a noxious taste. Another poten-
`tial problem has been documented more recently; alternative
`pathway medications may cause a selective deficiency of
`branched-chain amino acids [21]. Branched-chain amino acid sup-
`plementation may improve protein titration in UCD patients and is
`discussed in detail by Scaglia in this supplement.
`
`Missing metabolites
`
`After an oral dose of sodium phenylbutyrate, the concentration
`of phenylbutyrate (PB) peaks at 50–90 min and PA and PAGN peak
`at 150–180 min [22]. Although PAGN is the major product of PA
`metabolism, by conjugation of phenylacetyl-CoA with glutamine,
`a small amount of unchanged PA and PB is also excreted in the ur-
`ine. However, taken together the urinary excretion of PA, PB, and
`PAGN accounts for less than 50% of the ingested PB. The mystery
`of the ‘‘missing” PB has been solved only partially. In 2002, the no-
`vel metabolite phenylbutyrylglutamine was identified, although
`only about half of ingested PB was accounted for by the addition
`of this compound [22]. More recently, a number of other PB metab-
`olites, formed by interaction of PB with lipids and carbohydrates,
`have been identified. These new metabolites are either glucuron-
`ides (e.g. phenylbutyryl- or phenylacetyl-b-glucuronate) or b-oxi-
`dation
`side
`products
`(e.g.
`R-3-hydroxy-4-phenylbutyrate,
`phenylisopropanol). Nevertheless, even with the addition of these
`carbohydrate and lipid derivatives, the total recovery of PB and
`its metabolites accounted for only 62% of the ingested PB dose
`[23]. Therefore, it is likely that other metabolites of PB remain to
`be discovered. In addition, some of the ingested PB, metabolites
`of PB, or both may be excreted in feces. The fate of the PB glucuro-
`nide metabolites excreted in bile is unknown [23].
`
`HPN-100 (glyceryl tri-[4-phenylbutyrate])
`
`HPN-100 (glyceryl tri-[4-phenylbutyrate], glycerol phenylbuty-
`rate) is a new oral medication being developed for hyperammone-
`mia control in UCDs. Clinical trials in adult patients are currently
`underway. This investigational agent is a pro-drug of PB; glycerol
`phenylbutyrate is a triglyceride that contains three molecules of
`4-phenylbutyric acid joined via ester linkage to glycerol. Impor-
`tantly, glycerol phenylbutyrate is an organic liquid (oil) with little
`odor or taste that has the potential to deliver the same amount of
`phenylbutyrate in a much reduced amount of medication. The
`maximum anticipated dose of glycerol phenylbutyrate is 5.8 ml
`three times daily, which provides the equivalent to 20 g of PB
`(i.e. a little over three teaspoons daily provides the equivalent of
`40 tablets of BuphenylÒ). Glycerol phenylbutyrate also does not
`contain sodium. Greater patient acceptance and compliance may
`result from the combination of improved ease of administration
`and minimal odor.
`Pharmacology data from Cynomolgus monkeys, which have the
`capacity to convert PA to PAGN, suggest that glycerol phenylbuty-
`rate may act as a ‘slow release’ compound that may be metabolized
`to PAGN more efficiently than PB [23]. Ester hydrolysis of glycerol
`phenylbutyrate results in release of PB, which then can undergo b-
`oxidation to PA, the active compound. A Phase 2 study compared
`
`4 of 7
`
`

`

`G.M. Enns / Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 100 (2010) S65–S71
`
`S69
`
`plasma ammonium values, plasma and urine PAGN, and amino
`acid levels in 10 adult urea cycle patients who switched from their
`prescribed dose of BuphenylÒ to an equivalent dose of glycerol
`phenylbutyrate based on amount of PB. After seven days of treat-
`ment with three times daily glycerol phenylbutyrate, 24-h phar-
`macokinetic data was obtained and serial plasma ammonium
`levels were measured. Treatment with glycerol phenylbutyrate
`resulted in 30% lower plasma ammonium values as assessed
`by time-normalized AUC (mean NH3 on BuphenylÒ 38.4 ±
`19.6 lmol/L vs. 26.1 ± 10.3 lmol/L on glycerol phenylbutyrate,
`not statistically significant), similar plasma PAGN and amino acid
`levels, and similar urinary excretion of PAGN. Urinary PAGN ac-
`counted for 55% of the PB administered as BuphenylÒ or glycerol
`phenylbutyrate. Interestingly, there was a trend towards lower
`nocturnal ammonium values in subjects while being treated with
`glycerol phenylbutyrate. Somewhat fewer adverse events were re-
`ported during the glycerol phenylbutyrate period of this trial (21
`adverse events in seven subjects during BuphenylÒ treatment com-
`pared to 15 adverse events in five subjects during glycerol phen-
`ylbutyrate treatment). The only two hyperammonemic events
`during this study occurred in subjects being treated with Buphe-
`nylÒ and both episodes were attributed to medication non-adher-
`ence
`[24].
`In conclusion, glycerol phenylbutyrate plasma
`ammonium control appears to be at least comparable to Buphe-
`nylÒ. The trend toward lower overnight ammonium values may re-
`flect delayed release of PB following ester hydrolysis. This study
`also noted that eight of 10 subjects were prescribed BuphenylÒ
`in doses below the recommended treatment guidelines according
`to the package insert. Because 30% to 40% of plasma ammonium
`values were abnormal in these patients, higher medication doses
`may be beneficial. Further development of glycerol phenylbutyrate
`is warranted, especially given the difficulties facing urea cycle pa-
`tients with respect to daily pill burden and the noxious taste of
`BuphenylÒ. If the promise of the initial Phase 2 results is confirmed
`in larger-scale trials, glycerol phenylbutyrate has the potential to
`improve both medication adherence and, therefore, control of plas-
`ma ammonium levels.
`
`The future of hyperammonemia therapy
`
`In a sense, the future of UCD therapy is now. Specialized meta-
`bolic centers already have the clinical and technical expertise in
`place to cope with acute hyperammonemia, although more of such
`centers and improved access to those already in place are clearly
`needed [25]. Experienced metabolic centers typically have hyper-
`ammonemia protocols in place so that a coordinated response by
`multiple care providers (especially specialists in biochemical
`genetics, neonatology, surgery and nephrology) can proceed
`smoothly. Electronic order sets may further improve the delivery
`of multi-disciplinary care. Improvement is still needed with re-
`spect to the timeliness of identification of patients with elevated
`ammonium levels so that care can be instituted without delay. Ex-
`panded newborn screening has the potential to detect some UCDs
`based on elevations of citrulline or arginine, but at present proxi-
`mal defects (CPSI and OTC deficiencies) are not identified by tan-
`dem mass spectrometry, although techniques for doing so are
`under development. Even so, patients with neonatal onset forms
`of disease typically become symptomatic before results of new-
`born screening are known. Therefore, although further expanding
`newborn screening to include the proximal defects and improving
`the turn around time for obtaining test results may have some ef-
`fect on early identification of affected neonates, in practice out-
`comes may not be changed significantly unless there is increased
`awareness of these disorders by primary medical care providers.
`The connection between community hospitals and specialized
`treatment centers needs further strengthening.
`
`Rapid institution of alternative pathway therapy and adequate
`caloric support has the potential to improve outcome. For example,
`our institution strives to send transport teams out with a prepared
`supply of AmmonulÒ and arginine hydrochloride so that the pa-
`tient receives the initial bolus during transport. If the initial bolus
`is provided in such a manner, the treating physician may be able to
`make a decision on the need to institute hemodialysis upon arrival
`to the hospital. Of course, in some instances plasma ammonium
`will be at levels that clearly would not respond to alternative path-
`way therapy regardless of the time course of the intervention. In
`such instances, a decision about whether or not to proceed with
`dialysis will have to be made after careful evaluation of potential
`risks, benefits, and likely outcome. Hemodialysis, hemofiltration,
`and hemodiafiltration have been extremely effective treatments
`for acute management of hyperammonemia and techniques con-
`tinue to improve [26,27]. Mild systemic hypothermia, in addition
`to hemodialysis or hemofiltration, is another novel technique that
`may be useful
`in correcting hyperammonemia [28], but this
`modality has yet to be studied in UCD patients in a controlled clin-
`ical trial.
`Prenatal delivery of nitrogen-scavenging medications may also
`play a role in the initial care of UCD patients if a diagnosis is known
`before birth. Two fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of a UCD were
`treated by infusing their mothers with intravenous benzoate. Ther-
`apeutic benzoate concentrations were detected in umbilical cord
`blood and in the blood of the neonates. Plasma ammonium and
`glutamine concentrations were normal in the neonatal period for
`these children [29]. Novel medications, such as glycerol phenylbu-
`tyrate, may also prove useful in the chronic management of UCD
`patients.
`Liver transplantation has become an increasingly utilized ther-
`apeutic option for definitive correction of the underlying defect in
`UCDs, if the patient survives the initial hyperammonemic episode
`[30]. Advances in immunosuppression, operative techniques, and
`post-operative intensive care have contributed to improved out-
`come following transplantation [31]. Post-transplantation survival
`rates of patients who have inborn errors of metabolism appear to
`be higher, approaching 100%, when compared to survival following
`transplantation for other indications, such as acute liver failure,
`extrahepatic biliary atresia, or postnecrotic liver cirrhosis [32]. Im-
`proved survival following liver transplantation in metabolic disor-
`ders may be related to the presence of normal anatomy, the ability
`to perform elective surgery during periods of relative clinical sta-
`bility, or other factors. Preservation of intelligence is possible if
`transplantation is performed early, before neurological damage
`has been sustained [30]. Although hepatocyte transplantation is a
`promising new approach for the treatment of liver-based meta-
`bolic disorders, including UCDs, only limited success has been re-
`ported to date [33]. Gene therapeutic approaches also hold
`promise for the future, but significant hurdles need to be over-
`come. This topic is discussed more fully elsewhere in th

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket