throbber
Current strategies for the management of neonatal
`urea cycle disorders
`
`Marshall Summar, MD
`
`
`
`The treatment of newborns with urea cycle disorders has evolved over the
`years into a complex multidisciplinary effort. The complexity derives from
`the numberofissues that must be addressed simultaneously. At the Urea
`Cycle Disorders Consensus Meeting held in Washington, D.C., a panel of
`physicians and other professionals with extensive experience in this field
`was assembled to bring some systematizationto this task. This manuscript
`is a condensation of the collective opinion and experience of that group. The
`outcomeof untreated or poorly treated patients with urea cycle disordersis
`universally bad. Although a favorable outcomeis not alwaysfeasible, even
`with the best therapy, the methods outlined here should help treat such a
`patient by drawing on the experience of others who havetreated patients
`with urea cycle disorders. This article does not purport to bethe final word
`in treating children with these disorders. However,by establishing some
`commonground, new methodscan be tried and compared with existing
`ones. In a future that holds the prospect of gene therapy “cures” for these
`diseases, striving for the best possible outcomein the critical newborn peri-
`od is a worthy goal. (J Pediatr 2001;138:S30-S39)
`
`Neonatal hyperammonemiais a med-
`ical emergency requiring advanced
`planning, sophisticated facilities, and
`multidisciplinary teamwork. Urea
`cycle disorders are the primary cause
`of hyperammonemia during the vul-
`nerable newborn period. Genetic de-
`fects in any ofthe first 4 enzymes of
`the pathway (carbamyl] phosphate syn-
`thetase I, ornithine transcarbamylase,
`argininosuccinic
`acid
`synthetase,
`argininosuccinic acid lyase), or a co-
`factor producer (N-acetyl glutamate
`
`synthase) result in accumulations of
`precursor metabolites including am-
`monia (Fig 1). Because thereis no ef-
`fective secondary clearance system for
`ammonia, disruption of this pathway
`has a rapid clinical course. The catabo-
`lism normally present in the newborn
`period together with the immaturity of
`the liver combine to accentuate defects
`in these enzymes. This rapid accumu-
`lation of ammonia and other precursor
`metabolites results in acute cerebral
`edema with severe neurologic compro-
`
`Fromthe Division ofAledical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics and Molecular Physiology & Biophysics, Vander-
`bilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennesee.
`Reprint Requests: Marshall Summar, MD, Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pedi-
`atrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, DD 2205 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232-2578.
`Copyright © 2001 by Mosby,Inc.
`0022-3476/2001/$35.00 +0 9/0/111834
`
`doi:10.1067/mpd.2001.111834
`
`$30
`
`1 of 10
`
`mise.!> Thus fast and effective treat-
`ment is key to improvingthe patient’s
`outcome.
`
`A clear, concise protocol is required
`to treat neonates with severe hyperam-
`monemia caused by UCDs.In review-
`ing the experience of a numberofclin-
`iclans who have cared for
`these
`patients, several stages of treatment
`become apparent. These include (1)
`recognition and supportive treatment,
`(2) bulk ammonia removal and phar-
`macologic scavenging, (3) stabilization
`and catabolic reversal, and (4) transi-
`tion to home management. These steps
`are undertaken to accomplish specific
`therapeutic goals and include rapidly
`clearing ammonia from the neonate’s
`bloodstream, blocking the production
`of additional ammonia, removing ex-
`cess nitrogen, and protecting the neu-
`rologic integrity of the baby. All of
`these goals should be pursued with
`thoughtful expediency in the context
`of the patient's clinical situation.
`
`ASL
`ASS
`CPS
`ECMO
`
`Argininosuccinic acid lyase
`Argininosuccinic acid synthetase
`Carbamyl phosphate synthetase|
`Extracorporeal membrane
`oxygenation
`ECMO/HD Extracorporeal membrane
`oxygenation driving a
`hemodialysis machine
`N-acetyl! glutamate synthase
`Nasogastric
`Nasojejunal
`Ornithine transcarbamylase
`Ureacycle disorder
`
`NAGS
`NG
`NJ
`OTC
`UCD
`
`During each stage of management
`there are a numberofcritical elements
`to consider, including what is being
`done, whatare the results, and what
`remains to be done. This article is an
`attempt to provide guidance on the
`Horizon Exhibit 2005
`Horizon Exhibit 2005
`Lupin v. Horizon
`Lupin v. Horizon
`IPR2018-00459
`IPR2018-00459
`
`1 of 10
`
`

`

`THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
`VoLUME 138, NuMBER|
`
`SUMMAR
`
`a-Ketoglutarate
`NH*,
`Glycine «——_________» NH", LyGlutamate ALyGlutamine Phenylacetate «q—Phenylbutyrate
`Benzoate
`No HCO,
`ATP
`
`
`
`Phenylacetylglutamine
`
`CPS
`
`*aeeoo
`
`Urine
`
`Carbamy] phosphate
`
`
`
`xcretion
`
`Ornithine
`
`Citrulline
`
`Aspartate
`
`AS
`
`i;
`/
`
`‘
`if
`,
`
`iéé’
`
`Argininosuccinate
`
`Arginase
`
`AL
`
`Arginine
`
`ww
`
`Fumarate
`
`Supplemented ---7~~
`arginine
`
`Fig 1. Urea cycle and intermediate components.
`
`specifics of treating a patient with
`neonatal hyperammonemia.
`
`RECOGNITION AND
`SUPPORTIVE
`‘TREATMENT
`
`Once neonatal hyperammonemiais
`recognized, the necessary organization
`and supportivecare areinitiated to re-
`verse it as soonas possible.
`
`Clinical Presentation
`In the immediate newborn period,
`infants with UCDswill typically look
`normal. The problems that may have
`been observed while the child wasstill
`in hospital are often not seen until the
`child is at home becauseof the current
`
`practice of discharging the mother and
`newborn baby early. This places much
`of the burden of recognition on the
`family and the pediatrician or primary
`care physician. The typical
`initial
`symptoms of a child with hyperam-
`monemia,failure to feed, and somno-
`lence may not be recognized by new
`parents. As a result, advice andcareis
`soughtlater when the child’s illness has
`progressed to become moresevere.
`The progression of symptoms moves
`from somnolence, through lethargy,
`and on to coma. Thereis a loss of ther-
`moregulation with a low core tempera-
`ture and feeding disruption that corre-
`lates with the somnolence.
`Abnormal posturing and encepha-
`lopathy are often related to the degree
`of central nervous system swelling and
`
`pressure onthe brain stem.*> Seizures
`are seen in approximately 50%ofse-
`verely hyperammonemic neonates.
`Hyperventilation caused by cerebral
`edema causesa respiratory alkalosis
`that is also a common symptomin the
`early stages of the hyperammonemic
`attack, This progresses to hypoventila-
`tion and respiratory arrest as pressure
`increases on the brain stem.°”
`The algorithm in Fig 2 may assist
`with the evaluation of a hyperammone-
`mic newborn, but outside factors can
`influence the differential diagnosis.
`Factors such as the overall health of
`the liver,
`the duration of hyperam-
`monemia, and pharmacologic agents
`already given to the patient should be
`factored into the interpretation of the
`clinical observations.
`
`$31
`
`2 of 10
`
`2 of 10
`
`

`

`SUMMAR
`
`THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
`JANUARY 2001
`
`Symptomatic: lethargy, coma, etc.
`Lab: blood ammonia
`
`Diagnostic Considerations
`
`
`Elevated
`
`papprox. 100,Mol/L
`
`Lab: anion gap, glucose, blood and urine ketones
`
`
`
`
`]
`Other Metabolic Disorders
`
`
`
`
`Primary Urea Cycle Defect
`Anion gap >20 and/or hypoglycemla, and/or ketones
`Anion gap <20, glucose normal, low ketones
`Lab: organic acids, amino acids, carnitine etc.
`Lab: plasma/urine amino andurine organic acids
`
`THAN or NAGS, CPS or OTC Deficiency
`Normalor Low Citrulline
`
`
`
`
`ASD
`ALD
`THAN or NAGSor CPSD
`OTC Deficiency
`
`
`AbsentArgininosuccinate
`Elevated Argininosuccinate
`Elevated Orotate
`Low or Normal Orotate
`Lab:fibroblast
`Lab; fibroblast or red
`
`Lab: biopsy or DNA
`Lab: biopsy or DNA
`enzyme assay
`cell enzyme assay
`
`
`
`ASD or ALD
`Elevated Citrulline
`
`Fig 2. Algorithm for encephalopathic newborns.
`
`Table I. Diagnostic laboratory tests
`
`Table I. Laboratory measurements in acutelyill infants without UCD
`
`Ammonia
`pH and CO,
`Plasma quantitative amino acids
`Anion gap
`Glucose
`Urine organicacids and orotic acid
`Specific enzymatic or DNAanalysis
`
`Laboratory data useful in the diagno-
`sis of UCDsinclude plasma ammonia
`levels, pH, CO,, the anion gap, plasma
`amino acids, and urine organic acid
`analyses. Table I lists the recommended
`diagnostic tests, and Fig 2 highlights
`their use. The clinician should remem-
`ber that treatment should begin before
`a final diagnosis is made, andthatlater
`stages of treatment should betailored
`to the specific disorder (Table 1).
`Anelevated plasma ammonialevel of
`150 pmol/L or higher, associated with
`a normal anion gap and a normalblood
`glucoselevel, is a strong indication for
`the presence of a UCD. Quantitative
`amino acid analysis can be used to
`evaluate these patients and arrive at a
`tentative diagnosis. The aminoacids in
`sick newbornsare often quite different
`from those in children and adults, and
`
`wihBRAMCEREccccsainssnnniVORscatSsaisaciaicmeinais
`
`Ammonia
`Glutamine
`Glycine
`Alanine
`Citrulline
`Arginine
`
`47 umol/L
`581
`302
`319
`10.3
`38.3
`
`(13.5)
`(182)
`(100)
`(252)
`(7)
`(18.4)
`
`Averaged results from 25 babies admitted to the neonatalintensivecare unit.
`All babies were 35 weeks’ gestation with respiratory problems (birth asphyxia, respiratory dis-
`tress, or meconium aspiration syndrome).
`
`Table I} lists some of our averaged val-
`ues obtained in sick, term newborns
`without UCDs. The required diagnos-
`tic laboratory tests and their interpre-
`tation are discussed in moredetail else-
`wherein this supplement.
`In summary,
`infants with a UCD
`often have an initial normal appear-
`ance that progresses to lethargy and
`coma with the associated features of
`anorexia, hyperventilation, hypother-
`mia, hypoventilation, seizures, neuro-
`logic posturing, and otherfeatures of
`cerebral edema.
`
`Early Supportive Care
`These are the initial treatment steps
`that should be implemented as soon as
`
`the patient is suspected of having a
`urea cycle defect. They can be per-
`formed while the patient is being pre-
`pared fortransport to a metabolic cen-
`ter or being prepared for dialysis or
`pharmacologic management. Before
`care is initiated, some thought should
`be given to the severity ofthe patient's
`condition and to the probable long-
`term outcome. Patients who have been
`in a hyperammonemic comafor sever-
`al days have an extremely poor neuro-
`logic outcome. Although the patient
`may be successfully “detoxified” and
`stabilized, the damage to the central
`nervoussystem islikely to be devastat-
`ing and permanent. Thusthe option of
`withdrawal of support should be dis-
`
`$32
`
`3 of 10
`
`3 of 10
`
`

`

`THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
`VOLUME 138, NuMBER |
`
`SUMMAR
`
`ing it as prophylaxis. A bacterial infec-
`tion in a newborn baby with hyperam-
`monemia could well provefatal.
`There are several other important
`measuresto be taken when caring for
`these infants. Hyperventilation is rec-
`ommended and steroids are to be
`avoided, because they will increase the
`amount of protein turnover and hence
`increase the nitrogen load. Mannitol
`has not been demonstratedto be effec-
`tive in managing cerebral edema
`caused by hyperammonemia.
`The importance of early treatment
`cannot be overstressed. Ultimately the
`neurologic dysfunctionofthe patient is
`related to the duration of cerebral
`edema.”"!9 Most children will have
`cognitive impairment, butearly treat-
`ment to remove ammonia and other
`metabolites from the bloodstream will
`lessen the severity of this impairment.
`
`cussed with parents of patients who
`lism and nitrogen turnover. In addition
`to glucose, Intralipid administration
`have already sustained overwhelming
`can provide additional calories but
`damagetothe brain.
`Intravenous access should be estab-
`should not be
`allowed to delay
`lished as soon as possible. If practical,
`progress toward more ageressive treat-
`ment. Oral feedings should be discon-
`the patient with a UCD should have a
`tinued in patients with severe en-
`deep line placed such as an umbilical
`catheter or a multilumen centralline.
`cephalopathy but restarted as soon as
`practical. Placement of a nasogastric
`The need to resume feedings rapidly
`should influence the selection of line
`tube should be done duringthis early
`type. Stable vascular access will assist
`phase. Feeding ofall protein should be
`halted temporarily andcalories provid-
`with the administration of fluids, med-
`ed as carbohydrate and fat. For pa-
`ications, and the frequent blood sam-
`tients who are able to tolerate oral
`pling. Many patients with UCDsare
`dehydrated at presentation as a result
`feedings, a protein-free formula such
`as Mead Johnson 80056 or Ross For-
`of anorexia and poor oral
`intake.
`mula ProPhreecouldinitially be used.
`Restoration of normal hydration will
`Elemental formulas are not appropri-
`serve to protect renal function (critical
`ate because they contain considerable
`for effective treatment) and ensure ad-
`equate tissue perfusion (to blunt the
`amounts of nitrogen. This complete re-
`striction of protein should be main-
`further catabolic production of nitro-
`tained only for a short period (24 to 48
`gen). Overhydration should be avoid-
`ed because most patients with UCDs
`hours), because depletion of essential
`Organization and Mobilization
`have some degree of cerebral swelling.
`aminoacids will result in further pro-
`Intravenous administration of fluids
`Newborns with UCDs should be
`tein catabolism and nitrogen release.
`The author has found that maximizing
`treated by a team of experienced per-
`with 10% dextrose with one quarter
`caloric intake has a significant impact
`normal saline solution is preferable
`sonnel andin facilities with special re-
`to physiological saline solution, be-
`on patientstabilization after bulk am-
`sources (Table III). The community
`monia removal.
`cause patients treated with ammonia-
`physicians should be aware ofthese fa-
`Evenan infant who is awake andre-
`cilities and how to reach them. A meta-
`scavenging drugs will receive large
`amounts of sodium and chloride ions
`bolic specialist should coordinate the
`sponsive can progress to comaandcar-
`activities of the various team members
`diovascular or respiratory collapse
`as part of their medication regimen.
`and maintain continuity of treatment.
`Other support
`(pressors, buffering
`during transport or preparation for
`dialysis. Therefore it is preferable to
`agents), depending onthe cardiovas-
`As with any team approach,the roles
`cular and acid-balance status of the in-
`perform intubation on infants with
`of the members andthesteps and goals
`borderline clinical condition before
`of treatment should be clear before a
`fant, is also important. Protection of
`transport or before they have respira-
`kidney function is an important aspect
`patient with a UCDpresentsfor treat-
`tory compromise for 2 reasons: (1) if a
`of the early treatment ofthese patients.
`ment.
`In addition to alerting team
`patient is breathing rapidly (respirato-
`Many have depleted intravascular vol-
`members of the impendingarrivalof a
`ry alkalosis driven by cerebral edema),
`umesandgointo shock and have acute
`patient with a UCD,
`the managing
`renal failure. Once the dialysis phase is
`excess calories are burned, contribut-
`physician should also alert the labora-
`ing to catabolism andfurthernitrogen
`complete, the drugs used to scavenge
`tory regarding STATtests. The phar-
`excess ammonia from the bloodstream
`accumulation, and (2) intubation is a
`macy should also be alerted to ensure
`difficult procedure to carry out while
`require normalrenal function. The use
`that the specific medicationsare avail-
`an infant is being transported and can
`of boluses offluid and pressor agents
`able and can be prepared at short no-
`lead to hypoxia.
`should be balanced against the degree
`tice. Human subject permits shouldal-
`It is usual for a lethargic infant to
`of cerebral edemapresentat the time.
`ready be on hand, because treatment
`have undergonea septic workup with
`Oncotic agents such as albumin will
`with intravenous sodium phenylac-
`the initiation of antibiotic treatment.
`etate and sodium benzoateis still con-
`contribute to the overall nitrogen load
`but in selected cases, and onalimited
`With the heavy instrumentation and
`sidered experimental and is under an
`basis, can be used.
`stress patients with UCD undergo,it is
`FDAinvestigational new drug permit
`probably prudent to continue existing
`Caloric supplementation should be
`(contact Ucyclyd Pharmaceuticals for
`maximizedto try and reverse catabo-
`antibiotic coverage or considerinitiat-
`details). We have found that having
`
`$33
`
`4 of 10
`
`4 of 10
`
`

`

`SUMMAR
`
`Table IT, Treatment team membersand roles and responsibilities
`
`Team member
`
`Metabolic specialist
`Pharmacy
`
`Nephrologist or dialysis team
`Intensive care team
`
`Surgical team
`
`Laboratory staff
`
`Nutritionist
`
`Coordinate treatment and management.
`Formulate ammonia scavenging and
`dialysis agents. Check dosing orders.
`Dialysis
`Assist with physiological support, pain
`management, and ventilator
`management.
`Catheter placement for hemo- and
`peritoneal dialysis. Obtain biopsy
`sample for diagnostictesting.
`Ammonia, aminoacids, and organic
`acids
`
`Establish dietary prescription with
`metabolic foods and supplements.
`Assist with parenteral calorie
`managementandtransition
`to enteral feeding.
`
`the medications from the pharmacy
`ahead oftime and having blood hand-
`delivered to the chemistry laboratory
`saves considerablecritical time. Delays
`in treatment or response to changing
`status may affect the eventual outcome
`(Table ITI).
`
`Bulk Ammonia Removal and
`Pharmacologic Ammonia
`Scavenging
`The best way to remove ammonia
`rapidly is by dialysis.”!!-!5 Keeping
`ammonia
`from reaccumulating is
`achieved through the use of nitrogen
`scavenger drugs, discussed in detail
`elsewhere in this supplement. Loading
`with scavenger drugs should be done
`as soon as possible if urine output is
`adequate. Exchangetransfusionis in-
`effective in removing ammonia, and
`dialysis is the treatment of choice for
`rapid removalofthis toxin,”!1-15
`
`Preparation for Dialysis
`Dialysis is the primary means by
`which ammonia is removed from the
`patient’s body during the early manage-
`ment period, Ideally, the surgical and
`dialysis teams should be waiting for the
`patient to arrive andinitiate treatment
`
`immediately. If dialysis is not immedi-
`ately available, it is appropriate to use a
`loading dose of drugs to induce there-
`moval of ammonia. However,in the pa-
`tient with severe hyperammonemia,
`pharmacologic agents are not sufficient
`to remove ammonia quickly.
`The method ofdialysis chosen de-
`pends onthe available expertise and
`equipment. The fastest removal system
`uses an extracorporeal membrane oxy-
`genation pumpsystem to drive a he-
`modialysis machine.!#14.15 ECMO has
`become more widely available because
`ofits use in infant lung disease and car-
`diac surgery. Other methods include
`hemofiltration (both arteriovenous and
`venovenous), standard dialysis, peri-
`toneal
`dialysis,
`and
` continuous-
`drainage peritoneal dialysis. Each
`method has its own advantages and
`drawbacks.!?:!4-18 Because ammonia
`crosses the dialysis membranerapidly,
`the faster the flow rate, the higher the
`clearance. In critically ill newbornsit
`is difficult to perform standarddialysis
`for more than a few hours and main-
`tain homeostasis. Peritoneal dialysis
`clears ammonia at a low rate of 3 to 5
`mL/min, and if it is the sole means of
`ammonia removal, it may take several
`
`$34
`
`5 of 10
`
`THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
`JANUARY 2001
`
`days to reduce a significant ammonia
`burden.!? Peritoneal dialysis also com-
`plicates attempts at early refeeding and
`increasesthe risk of infection. Howev-
`er, peritoneal dialysis may be the most
`widely available form of toxin removal
`and does not require an entire dialysis
`team. A variation ofperitoneal dialysis
`with continuous inflow and outflow is
`effective but requires extremely close
`monitoring. Hemofiltration produces
`clearance rates of 10 to 30 mL/min,
`and clearance rates with ECMO/HD
`are on the order of 170 to 200
`mL/min.!? With the advent of percuta-
`neouscatheter placement for ECMO
`and the increased pumprates avail-
`able,
`the advantages of this method
`may outweighthe risk of blood vessel
`damage. Another advantage to the use
`of an ECMOpumpisthat a hemofilter
`can beplacedin the circuit to continue
`removal of ammonia betweendialysis
`runs. We have demonstrated reduc-
`tions of blood ammonialevels by >1000
`mol/L in a period of 1 to 2 hours with
`ECMO/HD.!? Osmoticshifts have not
`been observed withthis rapid dialysis,
`and recovery of neurologic activity is
`faster. For patients with less severe hy-
`perammonemia, a hemofiltration pump
`maysuffice for bulk ammonia removal.
`A review ofthe literature suggests that
`approximately 50% of the neonatesre-
`quiring dialysis for any reason under-
`go dialysis with a pressure-supported
`system. The extensive amountofin-
`strumentation arising from the use of
`any of these methodsincreasesthe risk
`of infection, and prophylactic antibiot-
`ic coverage should be considered for
`all patients.
`Dialysis seems to become less effec-
`tive when the plasma ammonia level
`falls below 200 mol/L and canbedis-
`continued. Once dialysis is stopped,
`and while the patientisstill in the acute
`phase, there may be a reboundofsever-
`al hundred [mol in the ammonialevel.
`This reflects both the continued cata-
`bolic state of the patient with the conse-
`quent production of waste nitrogen and
`the time required for the nitrogen scav-
`
`5 of 10
`
`

`

`THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
`VoLuME 138, NUMBER |
`
`enging medicationsto take effect. The
`use of hemofiltration can bluntor pre-
`vent this rebound. It is recommended
`that the catheters be removedonly after
`the plasma ammonialevel has beensta-
`ble for at least a day. However, this
`should be balanced by the risk of main-
`taining thepatient in an anticoagulated
`state. Some patients may require more
`than onesession ofdialysis to bring the
`ammonia level under control. In summa-
`ry, it is recommendedthat patients with
`severe hyperammonemia be treated
`initially with pump-driven dialysis
`(ECMO/HD)followed by continuous
`hemofiltration with the same pump
`system. In patients who are hemody-
`namically unstable, this procedureoffers
`pressure supportandbetter control over
`dialysis flow rates. A further advantage
`is that enteral feeding through an NG or
`nasojejunal tube can bestarted.
`
`Pharmacologic Management
`RATIONALE. The second line of the
`treatment for acute hyperammonemia
`involves the use of compoundsthatre-
`move nitrogen by alternative path-
`ways. Phenylacetate combines with
`glutamine to produce phenylacetylglu-
`tamine, a compoundthatis excreted in
`the urine.®:!9 The scavenged glutamine
`is replaced by synthesis in muscle and
`liver, thus reducing the nitrogen load.
`In addition, glutamine has been impli-
`cated in the neurotoxicity of UCDs;
`therefore its elimination may have a
`moredirect beneficialeffect.2°?3 Ben-
`zoate combines with glycine to pro-
`duce hippurate, which is also rapidly
`cleared by the kidneys.24?5 The
`glycine is replaced by synthesis, thus
`removing more waste nitrogen from
`the pool. While the precursor nitrogen
`is removed from circulation, attention
`mustalso be paid to replacing the defi-
`cient product(s) of the urea cycle (Fig
`1). CPS, NAGS, and OTC defects
`prevent
`the formation of citrulline
`from ornithine and carbamyl phos-
`phate. This in turn decreases the syn-
`thesis of arginine, resulting in it be-
`coming an essential amino acid. A
`
`block in ASS prevents the condensa-
`tion of aspartate withcitrulline, which
`accounts for 50%ofthe nitrogen incor-
`porated into the pathway. ASL defi-
`ciency blocks conversion of argini-
`nosuccinate to arginine. Therefore
`arginine is also an essential amino acid
`in ASS and ASL deficiencies.2&?7
`Even in ASS and ASL deficiency,
`wherethereis a partially intact urea
`cycle,
`the body rapidly depletes its
`pool of urea cycle intermediates into
`which it normally incorporates nitro-
`gen. Therefore arginine serves as a
`therapeutic agent in UCD. In CPS,
`NAGS, OTC, ASS, and ASL deficien-
`cy; arginine is used to restore its blood
`levels and prevent the breakdown of
`endogenousprotein.2°?7 In ASS and
`ASL deficiency it
`is used in larger
`amounts to “prime” the cycle to pro-
`duce
`citrulline
`or
`argininosucci-
`nate.?48 This has the advantageofin-
`corporating a substantial amount of
`nitrogen in compoundshaving a lower
`toxicity and higher renal excretion. In
`ASS(citrullinemia), 1 mol of nitrogen
`can be removed for every moleof argi-
`nine metabolized throughthe cycle, and
`this doubles in ASL to 2 mol. L-
`citrulline may serve as a better supple-
`mentfor patients with OTC and CPS
`than arginine, becauseit is converted to
`arginine while promoting the incorpo-
`ration of one waste nitrogen; however,
`an intravenous formulationof citrulline
`is not currently available. A note of cau-
`tion concerning arginine. Arginineis a
`precursorofnitric oxide, a potent va-
`sodilator. Anecdotal evidence and the
`author’s own experience suggest that
`in CPS and OTCdeficiencies, large
`amounts of excess arginine may accu-
`mulate, resulting in overproduction of
`nitric oxide and leading to extreme
`vasodilation and hypotension.!? Reduc-
`tion in arginine administration corre-
`sponded with restored venoustone in 2
`patients caredfor in ourinstitution.
`
`Administration Protocol
`These dose recommendations are
`based on the Food and Drug Adminis-
`
`SUMMAR
`
`tration packaging for intravenoussodi-
`um benzoate/sodium phenylacetate
`and the protocols developed by Dr.
`Saul Brusilow.©”:!! They are summa-
`rized in Table IV.
`
`Loading Dose
`The current protocol for the acute
`management of hyperammonemiain-
`cludes arginine hydrochloride (600
`mg/kg in a 10% solution), and a combi-
`nation of sodium benzoate and sodium
`phenylacetate (250 mg/kg of each
`drug), all infused in 25 to 35 mL/kg of
`10% dextrose in water over a 90-
`minute period. The blood pH should be
`monitored and buffer added to coun-
`teract the acidity of the arginine hy-
`drochloride. The dose of arginine has
`been increased from previous proto-
`cols, because a rapid infusion of argi-
`nineis believed to have a significant im-
`pact on patients with ASS and ASL
`deficiency and berelatively safe for pa-
`tients with OTC, CPS, and NAGSde-
`ficiency. Caution should be exercised if
`additional doses of sodium benzoate
`and sodium phenylacetate are given
`within 24 hours ofthe original dose,
`but experience suggests that 500 mg/kg
`each of sodium benzoate and sodium
`phenylacetate during the first 24 hours
`is an acceptable regimen (1 loading
`dose + maintenance infusion). At 750
`me/kg/24 h,
`there is some toxicity
`(vomiting, lethargy), and at >750 mg/
`kg/24 h, the toxicity is essentially in-
`variable and can be life-threatening.
`Reloading (repeating the initial regi-
`men) should be contemplated only in
`neonates with severedisorders or those
`whoare undergoing dialysis and, based
`on theresults of pharmacokinetic stud-
`ies, should be spaced at least 6 hours
`apart (refer to Dr. Batshaw’s article
`elsewhere in this supplement for more
`extensive information on the pharma-
`cologic management of UCDs).
`
`Maintenance Infusion
`Oncethe loading doseis given, the pa-
`tient should be switched to the mainte-
`nanceinfusion. The dosesdiffer only in
`
`$35
`
`6 of 10
`
`6 of 10
`
`

`

`SUMMAR
`
`THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
`JANUARY 2001
`
`Table IV. Recommended doses of pharmacologic agents to be used during dialysis periods
`
`Sodium benzoate/phenylacetate dosage and administration
`sieNaaNaeatuCsRNSENESUM,CANE.ussnsnsnnnnnnnsninsinnnnnnnnnnnsnnesnns
`
`Patientpopulation
`
`a.omponentsofinfusionsolution
`
`soon.dosageprovided
`
`SB/SA
`
`Arginine HCl
`
`Dextrose
`
`Sodium
`
`Sodium
`benzoate
`
`Neonates/Infants/Young children:
`Prospective treatment pending definitive diagnosis of urea cycle enzyme deficiency
`6.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`250 mg/kg
`250 mg/kg
`2.5 mL/kg
`6.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`250 mg/kg
`250 mg/kg
`2.5 mL/kg
`CPS or OTC Deficiency
`2.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`2.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`ASSor ASL deficiency
`6.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`6.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`
`Loading dose
`Maintenancedose
`
`Loading dose
`Maintenancedose
`
`2.5 mL/kg
`2.5 mL/kg
`
`Loading dose
`Maintenance dose
`Olderchildren and adults:
`
`2.5 mL/kg
`2.5 mL/kg
`
`250mg/kg
`250 mg/kg
`
`250 mg/kg
`250 mg/kg
`
`250 mg/kg
`250 mg/kg
`
`250 me/kg
`250 mg/kg
`
`600 mg/kg
`600 mg/kg
`
`200 mg/kg
`200 mg/kg
`
`600 mg/kg
`600 mg/kg
`
`200 mg/kg
`200 me/kg
`
`600 mg/kg
`600 mg/kg”
`
`Loading dose
`Maintenance dose
`
`Loading dose
`Maintenance dose
`
`55 mL/m?
`55 mL/m2
`
`55 mL/m2
`55 mL/m?
`
`SB, Sodium benzoate; SA, sodium phenylacetate.
`
`CPSor OTCdeficiency
`2.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`2.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`ASSor ASLdeficiency
`6.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`6.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`
`5.5 g/m?
`5.5 g/m?
`
`5.5 g/m?
`5.5 g/m?
`
`5.5 g/m?
`5.5 g/m?
`
`5.5 g/m?
`5.5 g/m?
`
`the amountofarginine hydrochloride
`given and are dependenton the diagno-
`sis. The 24-hourdose of the combination
`of sodium benzoate/sodium phenylac-
`etate is 250 mg/kg/24 h of each drug.
`For patients with CPS, OTC, or NAGS
`deficiency,
`the dose of arginine hy-
`drochloride is 200 mg/kg/24 h. For ASS
`and ASL deficiency the dose ofarginine
`is 600 mg/kg/24 h. For patients awaiting
`diagnosis, the 200 mg/kg/24 h dose of
`arginine should be used in conjunction
`with sodium benzoate and sodium
`phenylacetate. Attention should be paid
`to the potassium level of the patient, and
`the maintenance fluids should have
`potassium added,
`because
`sodium
`phenylacetate may cause potassium de-
`pletion. The maintenance infusion is
`continued until a conversion to oral
`medication is made. Cerebral blood flow
`or electroencephalography analysis may
`be required to determine whethertreat-
`ment should be discontinued.
`
`Laboratory Monitoring
`Our center measures ammoniaplas-
`malevels every hour during high-flow
`rate dialysis. These samples should be
`handled expeditiously to get the fastest
`possible turnaround. Once the ammo-
`nia plasmalevelhasstabilized to <200
`to 300 pmol/L,
`the monitoring fre-
`quency can be reduced to once every
`few hours. When the patientis receiv-
`ing a stable drug regimen and no
`longer requires dialysis, the frequency
`can be further reduced to every 12
`hours and to once-daily before dis-
`charge. During the acute phase, elec-
`trolytes and acid-base balance should
`be
`carefully monitored (every 4
`hours). Glucose should be monitored
`hourly in patients receiving a glucose/
`insulin infusion to avoid wide swings
`in glucose levels. Amino acids should
`be monitored on a daily basis to assess
`nutritional status and the effectiveness
`of glutamine removal and citrulline/
`
`arginine replacement. The amountof
`blood removed should be monitored
`and transfusion used to avoid iatro-
`genic anemia.
`
`Other Acute Treatment Issued
`Opinion is divided among experts
`on the use of glucose and insulin in
`these patients. Glucose and insulin can
`serve as suppressorsofcatabolism, but
`their use requires care. The consensus
`opinion at this meeting was to admin-
`ister 6 to 8 mg/kg/min of glucose (ad-
`ministered as 10% dextrose in water)
`and to use insulin sparingly to main-
`tain the serum glucose level <170
`mg/dL. The presence of glycosuria is
`an indication for continued adminis-
`tration of intravenous regular insulin
`at a rate that keeps glucoselevels be-
`tween 120 and 170 mg/dL. Wide swings
`in glucose levels can change the osmo-
`lality of the brain and therefore should
`be avoided.
`
`$36
`
`7 of 10
`
`7 of 10
`
`

`

`THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
`VoLUME 138, NUMBER|
`
`The use of normal saline solution
`
`should also be avoided, because the
`pharmacologic agents used in ammo-
`nia removal contain large amounts of
`sodium andchlorideions.
`The use of carnitine in neonates
`being treated with sodium benzoateis
`not believed to be beneficial. There
`have been no documentedcasesofcar-
`nitine deficiency, even though carni-
`tine levels are low in these neonates,
`and carnitine is known to conjugate
`with sodium benzoate.
`Valproic acid should be avoided in
`any patient who has seizures. It is
`knownto decrease urea cycle function
`and will aggravate the hyperammone-
`mia.29-5!
`Enteral citrulline is used in some
`centers for neonates with UCD and
`
`CPSor OTCdeficiencies, the rationale
`being that pulling aspartate into the
`pathway may increase nitrogenclear-
`ance. The doseof citrulline used is 150
`to 200 mg/kg/24 h. A clear diagnosis
`should be made before citrulline is
`used to avoid providing citrulline to
`patients with ASS and ASL whoal-
`ready have excessive amounts ofthis
`amino acid.
`
`Stabilization and Catabolic
`Reversal
`
`This phase overlaps with the second
`phase to some extent. Oneofthe keys
`to successful treatment of a patient
`with a UCDisto reverse the catabolic
`This
`process.
`decreases nitrogen
`turnover and reduces the amount of
`ammonia that must be detoxified. Dur-
`ing this stage there may be fluctuations
`in the ammonia plasma levels, and
`often the bulk ammonia removal pro-
`tocol will have to be repeated. Some
`form of low-level dialysis (hemofiltra-
`tion) may be continued during the
`early parts of this phase while the pa-
`tient’s nitrogen production exceeds re-
`moval.
`
`Caloric Management
`The author recommendsthat the pa-
`tient be started on some form ofenteral
`
`feed as soon as is practical. This may
`occur while the patientis still undergo-
`ing cannulation. The pla

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket