throbber
(19) United States
`(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0008859 A1
`SCHARSCHMIDT
`(43) Pub. Date:
`Jan. 14, 2010
`
`US 20100008859A1
`
`(54) METHODS OF TREATMENT USING
`AMMONA-SCAVENGING DRUGS
`(76) Inventor:
`Bruce SCHARSCHMIDT, South
`San Francisco, CA (US)
`Correspondence Address:
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`12531 HIGH BLUFF DRIVE, SUITE 100
`SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-2040 (US)
`
`(21) Appl. No.:
`1-1.
`(22) Filed:
`
`12/350,111
`
`Jan. 7, 2009
`O
`O
`Related U.S. Application Data
`(60) Provisional application No. 61/093,234, filed on Aug.
`29, 2008, provisional application No. 61/048.830,
`filed on Apr. 29, 2008.
`
`
`
`Publication Classification
`
`(51) Int. Cl.
`30.8
`3. (9%,
`(2006.01)
`A6IPI3/00
`(52) U.S. Cl. .......................................... 424/9.2: 514/568
`(57)
`ABSTRACT
`The invention provides a method for determining a dose and
`schedule and making dose adjustments of PBA prodrugs used
`to treat nitrogen retention states, or ammonia accumulation
`disorders, by measuring urinary excretion of phenylacetyl
`y
`9.
`ary
`pneny
`y
`glutamine and/or total urinary nitrogen. The invention pro
`vides methods to select an appropriate dosage of a PBA
`prodrug based on the patient's dietary protein intake, or based
`on previous treatments administered to the patient. The meth
`ods are applicable to selecting or modifying a dosing regimen
`for a subject receiving an orally administered ammonia Scav
`enging drug.
`
`Sodium Phenlybutyrate
`
`Page 1 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 1 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`Figure 1
`
`
`
`Sodium Phenlybutyrate
`
`Page 2 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 2 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`Figure 2
`
`A conventional clinical pharmacology model in which only drug reaching the central (systemic)
`circulation is assumed to be active.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PK/PD Modeling of PBA/PAA/PAGN/UPAGN
`- Conventional Approach -
`Note:
`This model only allows for conversion of PBA to
`PAA to PAGN in the systemic (labeled "central')
`plasma compartment. Bioavailability and drug
`effect is assume to relate directly to plasma
`metabolite Concentations
`
`HPN-100 or
`Buphenyi
`
`--------------
`
`Covariate
`BSAvii.73 x VM1, VM2, VPB, VPA, WPG
`
`Page 3 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 3 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`
`
`(,w/6¢)OOL-NdH
`
`POWWNoL
`
`000s
`
`00S
`
`NOVd
`
`Vad
`
`
`
`VVdenne
`
`
`
`~~(,w/6g)eANAHdna
`
`000¢
`
`00s
`
`os
`
`(INN) UONe4JUsDUOD eWse]g UAW
`
`(sanoy)ow
`
`og:©G202°.SIOLS0
`
`(sanoy)oui
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Vddumnipossy)Aqpopraoidyey)0)YqJOJunowesJejownbsuespraoid0}payenoyesJuNOUIeULUTQOT-NdHJ0‘adesopzwy/8¢¥e(WadWNIpos)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jan. 14,2010 Sheet 4 of 15
`
`
`
`(aye1AyngjAuoydwmnipos)@IANSHdNndBuIAtaoalsyoalqnsUINOVWd10WWd‘WdJOSaad]pamnsvourquasaidassavinoy)‘jauedyoreuy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘joued4J9]94)Ul“OOI-NdH10VadWniposjosasesopparjioadsay)paatzoaloymsyoofqnssoy)JOJare[eLIaJeUYOeDJOJS9AINDDAI,“asesOp
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOVdSluasaidalsoulJOs}983aIYJOY}JOISOMO]DY)Pue‘s[dAd]WWSJUesaidalsuoayeIpaulsaUTay}‘spaAo]WadSJuesaidalsanoJaddnayy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`yuasaidaysino0y$Z-C]JeSOAINDsary}ISOYySTYOY}pueSWEJOJ]]eareuedsOUT)NOYS]-OToY)JeSAAINOJsaMoO]Bam)ay}‘JouedIYBIayyUY“sTIAZT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“OW3eY}0}dnSoAINDNOVY2)0}asojoAT[esoues[[eJpue‘sInoyZ]{A[ayewrxoddeJayepourussjap10USIOMS[9A2Z]WWd_‘ST2A2]NOWd
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`Page 5 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`
`
`
`
`(suueu6) NOVdAleuun
`
`Page 6 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 6 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`9 EIRI[10][H
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 7 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`00° 058 000 osz ooz , , 00° 058 000 osz00?oov ose 008 092 002
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 8 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`OOV OGC 00£ OGz 002.·|00° 09€ 00€ 092 002 00° 09€ 008 092 00z
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application
`
`Pub
`
`Ca
`
`ion
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 9 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`
`
`
`
`3SOO NAJH --+--
`
`ssxeuuo
`
`
`
`
`
`3SOO, NdH pue OnV/Vºld
`
`
`
`
`
`|
`
`
`
`000 !
`
`008
`009
`007
`Xeuo
`
`0
`
`002
`
`Page 10 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 10 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`
`
`i
`
`CD
`O
`O
`2
`
`C
`O
`
`O
`D
`C
`C
`C
`al
`
`Page 11 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 11 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`
`
`36 9.InáH
`
`
`
`
`
`3SOp Neff H pue N3)\/d-fn
`
`0000009||
`
`000000?7||
`
`0000002 ||
`
`0000000 ||
`
`0000008
`
`0000009
`
`000000;
`
`000000Z
`
`Page 12 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 12 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`
`
`Xeuu:0
`
`00!--NdH
`„TÄNEHdnº
`
`SOTV/-NL
`
`
`
`001-NdH „TANEHdnº
`
`09
`
`09
`
`(w) alo
`( / Iouri) HN
`
`
`
`
`
`uelpew ----------
`
`(I-1
`
`
`
`| 001-NdH |:TANEHdna
`
`Page 13 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 13 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`
`
`II º InáH
`
`„H 17Z-Z].JIH Z 1-0
`
`d
`r
`
`d
`
`N
`
`co
`
`(1/uoun) euouuW
`
`Page 14 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 14 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`„asop (NdH][dng] 100/qnS
`
`ZI CHRI[10IH
`
`Page 15 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jan. 14, 2010 Sheet 15 of 15
`
`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`
`
`
`
`00!. -NdHTlÅNEHc][18]
`
`08
`
`O
`d
`w
`O
`(?oun) euouuv.
`
`Page 16 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`Jan. 14, 2010
`
`METHODS OF TREATMENT USING
`AMMONIA-SCAVENGING DRUGS
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`0001. This application claims benefit of priority to U.S.
`Provisional application Ser. No. 61/093,234, filed Aug. 29.
`2008, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
`This application is also related to the U.S. provisional patent
`application entitled "Treating special populations having
`liver disease with nitrogen-Scavenging compounds.” naming
`Sharron Gargosky as inventor, Ser. No. 61/048.830, filed on
`Apr. 29, 2008.
`
`TECHNICAL FIELD
`0002 This invention relates to treatment of patients with
`nitrogen retention states, in particular urea cycle disorders
`(UCDs) and cirrhosis complicated by hepatic encephalopathy
`(HE), using administered compounds that assist in elimina
`tion of waste nitrogen from the body. The compounds can be
`orally administered Small-molecule drugs, and the invention
`provides methods for delivering these compounds and select
`ing Suitable dosages for a patient.
`
`BACKGROUND ART
`0003 Drug dosing is usually based upon measurement of
`blood levels of the active drug species in conjunction with
`clinical assessment of treatment response. However, the
`present invention is based on evidence that for certain pro
`drugs of phenylacetic acid (PAA), measuring the blood level
`of the prodrug (e.g. PBA) or of PAA formed from it is unre
`liable. In addition, assessment of treatment effect by measur
`ing levels of ammonia in the blood is inconvenient, because it
`requires withdrawing multiple blood samples under carefully
`controlled conditions. Because blood ammonia levels are
`affected by various factors including dietary protein, they also
`fail to provide a direct measure of how much ammonia the
`drug is mobilizing for elimination. The invention demon
`strates that prodrugs of phenylbutyric acid (PBA) behave
`similarly to sodium PBA, in that measuring PBA levels is
`unreliable for assessing their effectiveness. This invention
`provides a novel method for dosing in patients with nitrogen
`retention states, in particular patients with liver disease and
`clinical manifestations of hepatic encephalopathy and
`patients with UCDs. It is particularly applicable to prodrugs
`that liberate or are metabolized to form phenylacetic acid, i.e.,
`prodrugs of PAA, and those prodrugs that are metabolized to
`form PBA.
`0004 Hepatic encephalopathy refers to a spectrum of neu
`rologic signs and symptoms which frequently occur in
`patients with cirrhosis or certain other types of liver disease.
`0005 Urea cycle disorders comprise several inherited
`deficiencies of enzymes or transporters necessary for the
`synthesis of urea from ammonia. The urea cycle is depicted in
`FIG. 1, which also illustrates how certain ammonia-Scaveng
`ing drugs act to assist in elimination of excessive ammonia.
`The enzymes including their Enzyme Commission (EC)
`numbers and modes of inheritance include the following:
`0006 Carbamyl phosphate synthetase (CPS: EC Num
`ber 6.3.4.16; autosomal recessive),
`0007 ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC: EC Number
`2.1.3.3: X-linked),
`
`0008 argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS: EC Number
`6.3.4.5; autosomal recessive),
`0009 argininosuccinate lyase (ASL; EC Number 4.3.2.
`1; autosomal recessive),
`0010) arginase (ARG; EC Number 3.5.3.1: autosomal
`recessive), and
`0.011
`N-acetyl glutamine synthetase (NAGS 1; EC
`Number 2.3.1.1; autosomal recessive)
`0012 Mitochondrial transporter deficiency states which
`mimic many features of urea cycle enzyme deficiencies
`include the following:
`0013 Ornithine translocase deficiency (hyperomithine
`mia, hyperammonemia, homocitrullinuria or HHH Syn
`drome)
`0.014) Citrin (aspartate glutamate transporter) defi
`ciency
`0015 The common feature of UCD and hepatic encepha
`lopathy that render them treatable by methods of the inven
`tion is an accumulation of excess waste nitrogen in the body,
`and hyperammonemia. In normal individuals, the body's
`intrinsic capacity for waste nitrogen excretion is greater than
`the body's waste nitrogen production, so waste nitrogen does
`not accumulate and ammonia does not build up to harmful
`levels. For patients with nitrogen retention states such as
`UCD or HE, the body's intrinsic capacity for waste nitrogen
`excretion is less than the body's waste nitrogen production
`based on a normal diet that contains significant amounts of
`protein. As a result, nitrogen builds up in the body of a patient
`having a nitrogen retention disorder, and usually results in
`excess ammonia in the blood. This has various toxic effects;
`drugs that help eliminate the excess ammonia are an impor
`tant part of an overall management strategy for Such disor
`ders.
`0016 To avoid build-up of ammonia to toxic levels in
`patients with nitrogen retention states, dietary intake of pro
`tein (a primary source of exogenous waste nitrogen) must be
`balanced by the patient's ability to eliminate excess ammonia.
`Dietary protein can be limited, but a healthy diet requires a
`significant amount of protein, particularly for growing chil
`dren; thus in addition to controlling dietary protein intake,
`drugs that assist with elimination of nitrogen are used to
`reduce ammonia build-up (hyperammonemia). The capacity
`to eliminate excess ammonia in treated patients can be con
`sidered the Sum of the patient's endogenous capacity for
`nitrogen elimination (if any) plus the amount of additional
`nitrogen-elimination capacity that is provided by a nitrogen
`Scavenging drug. The methods of the invention use a variety
`of different drugs that reduce excess waste nitrogen and
`ammonia by converting it to readily-excreted forms, such as
`phenylacetylglutamine (PAGN). In some embodiments, the
`invention relates to methods for determining or adjusting a
`dosage of an oral drug that forms PAA in vivo, which is
`converted into PAGN, which is then excreted in urine and thus
`helps eliminate excess nitrogen.
`0017 Based on prior studies in individual UCD patients
`(e.g. Brusilow, Pediatric Research, vol. 29, 147-50 (1991);
`Brusilow and Finkelstien, J. Metabolism, Vol. 42, 1336-39
`(1993)) in which 80-90% of the nitrogen scavenger sodium
`phenylbutyrate was reportedly excreted in the urine as PAGN,
`current treatment guidelines typically either assume complete
`conversion of sodium phenylbutyrate or other PAA prodrugs
`to PAGN (e.g. Berry et al., J. Pediatrics, vol. 138, S56-S61
`(2001)) or do not comment on the implications of incomplete
`conversion for dosing (e.g. Singh, Urea Cycle Disorders Con
`
`Page 17 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`Jan. 14, 2010
`
`ference Group Consensus Statement from a Conference for
`the Management of Patients with Urea Cycle Disorders,
`Suppl to J Pediatrics, vol. 138(1), S1-S5 (2001)).
`0018 Current treatment guidelines recommend 4 times
`per day dosing, based on the fact that PBA is absorbed rapidly
`from the intestine when administered in the form of sodium
`PBA and exhibits a short half life in the bloodstream (Urea
`Cycle Disorders Conference Group Consensus Statement
`2001)
`0019 Current recommendations for sodium phenylbu
`tyrate dosing indicate that dosage should not exceed 600
`mg/kg (for patients weighing up to 20 kg) or in any case 20
`grams total.
`
`DISCLOSURE OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE
`INVENTION
`0020. The invention provides a novel approach for deter
`mining and adjusting the schedule and dose of orally admin
`istered nitrogen Scavenging drugs, including sodium phenyl
`butyrate and glyceryl tri-4-phenylbutyrate (HPN-100),
`based upon the urinary excretion of the drug metabolite phe
`nylacetylglutamine (PAGN) and/or total urinary nitrogen. It
`is based in part on the discoveries that bioavailability of these
`drugs as conventionally assessed based on systemic blood
`levels of the drugs themselves or of the active species pro
`duced in vivo from these drugs does not accurately predict
`removal of waste nitrogen or reduction of plasma ammonia in
`healthy human volunteers, adults with liver disease, or
`patients with UCDS receiving ammonia Scavenging drugs as
`defined below and that conversion of orally administered
`sodiumphenylbutyrate (NaPBA, or sodium PBA) to PAGN to
`urinary PAGN is incomplete, typically about 60-75%. Pro
`drugs of phenylbutyrate (PBA, the active ingredient in
`BUPHENYL(R) (sodium phenylbutyrate), which is the
`sodium salt of PBA along with small amounts of inert ingre
`dients), which is itself a prodrug of phenylacetic acid (PAA),
`are especially subject to the effects described herein.
`
`CONa"
`
`phenylbutyrate
`OH
`
`O
`
`Phenylacetic acid
`O
`NH2
`
`Phenylacetylglutamine
`
`0021 AS used herein 'ammonia Scavenging drugs' is
`defined to include all orally administered drugs in the class
`which contain or are metabolized to phenylacetate. Thus, the
`term includes at least phenylbutyrate, BUPHENYL(R) (so
`dium phenylbutyrate), AMMONAPSR), butyroyloxymethyl
`4-phenylbutyrate, glyceryl tri-4-phenylbutyrate (HPN
`
`100), esters, ethers, and acceptable salts, acids and derivatives
`thereof. These drugs reduce high levels of endogenous
`ammonia by providing phenylacetic acid in vivo, which is
`metabolized efficiently to form phenylacetyl glutamine
`(PAGN). PAGN is efficiently excreted in urine, carrying away
`two equivalents of nitrogen per mole of PAA converted to
`PAGN. References herein to sodium phenylbutyrate are
`understood to include reference to the drug product BUPHE
`NYL(R), and BUPHENYL(R) was used for the Examples herein
`wherever test subjects were treated with sodium phenylbu
`tyrate. Thus the sodium PBA dosages used in the Examples
`generally refer to a dosage of BUPHENYL(R), and the
`amounts of sodium phenylbutyrate in those Examples should
`be interpreted accordingly. Note that the terms ammonia
`Scavenger and nitrogen scavenger are used interchangeably
`in this invention, reflecting the fact that the drugs described
`herein lower blood ammonia through elimination of waste
`nitrogen in the form of PAGN.
`0022. In some embodiments, the invention uses prodrugs
`that can be converted into PAA within the body. Sodium
`phenylbutyrate (sodium PBA) is one such drug; it is converted
`by oxidative mechanisms into PAA in the body. HPN-100 is
`another such drug: it can behydrolyzed to release PBA, which
`in turn can be oxidized to form PAA. Thus, HPN-100 is a
`prodrug of PBA, and also a prodrug of PAA. Clinical evi
`dence demonstrates that HPN-100 is converted into PAA in
`the body as expected, and that PAA is then linked to a mol
`ecule of glutamine and converted into PAGN, which is elimi
`nated in the urine as predicted. This process can be summa
`rized as follows:
`
`HPN-100-s3PBA-3PAA
`
`PAA+glutamine->PAGN.
`0023 PAGN is mainly excreted in the subject's urine, and
`removes two molecules of ammonia per molecule of excreted
`PAGN. Each HPN-100 molecule forms three PAA molecules,
`so each molecule of HPN-100 can promote excretion of six
`molecules of ammonia. The clinical results suggest that con
`version of HPN-100 into PBA and PAA is efficient and fairly
`rapid, but Surprisingly suggest that some conversion of HPN
`to PAGN may occur before the HPN-100 (or PBA, or PAA
`derived from PBA) enters systemic circulation. As a result,
`systemic levels of PAA or PBA are not reliably correlated
`with the efficacy of HPN-100 as an ammonia scavenger.
`0024. In some embodiments, the invention uses a prodrug
`of PBA, including HPN-100 and other esters of phenylbu
`tyrate. The PBA prodrug is thus a prodrug of a prodrug, since
`PBA acts to scavenge ammonia after it is converted to PAA
`and is thus considered a prodrug of PAA. In some embodi
`ments, the PBA prodrug is an ester of phenylbutyrate, such as
`those described below; a preferred PBA prodrug for use in the
`invention is HPN-100. These compounds can be made and
`used by methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,968,979, which
`is incorporated herein by reference for its description of these
`compounds and methods for their administration.
`0025. Where an equal molar or equimolar amount of a
`second drug is to be used along with or instead of a certain
`amount of a first drug, the amount of each drug is calculated
`on a molar basis, and the equimolar amount of the second
`drug is the amount that produces an equal molar amount of
`active drug in vivo. Where one of the drugs is a prodrug, the
`amount of prodrug will typically refer to the molar amount of
`the active species formed from that prodrug. That active spe
`cies is usually PAA for the prodrugs described herein, and the
`molaramount of a prodrug corresponds to the amount of PAA
`that would form in the body from that amount of the prodrug,
`assuming complete conversion into PAA occurs in vivo.
`
`Page 18 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`Jan. 14, 2010
`
`Thus, for example, a molecule of HPN-100 can be metabo
`lized by ester hydrolysis followed by oxidation to form three
`molecules of PAA, so a mole of HPN-100 would be consid
`ered equimolar to three moles of PAA. Similarly, since HPN
`100 hydrolyzes to form three molecules of PBA (and one
`molecule of glycerin), an equimolar amount of HPN-100
`would be one-third of the molar amount of PBA.
`0026. The following Table sets forth amounts of HPN-100
`that correspond to equimolar amounts of certain relevant
`doses of BUPHENYL(R) (sodium phenylbutyrate). Note that
`the conversion of the dose of sodium PBA to the dose of
`HPN-100 involves correction for their different chemical
`forms i.e. HPN-100 consists of glycerol in ester linkage with
`3 molecules of PBA and contains no sodium; (sodium PBA
`gx0.95=HPN-100g) as well as correction for the specific
`gravity of HPN-100, which is 1.1 g/mL.
`
`the triol backbone liberated by hydrolysis of the esters is
`glycerol, a normal constituent of dietary triglyceride
`which is non-toxic.
`0030 The present invention also utilizes phenylbutyrate
`and phenylacetate prodrugs of the formula II:
`
`(II)
`
`O
`
`R-0-l R4
`
`0031 wherein R is a C-C alkyl group,
`0032 R is
`
`BUPHENYL (R)
`(sodium PBA)
`450-600 mg/kg/day
`(patients is 20 kg)
`9.9-13.0 g/m2/day
`(patients > 20 kg)
`Maximum Daily
`Dose: 20 g
`
`HPN-100 PBA
`Equivalent
`Dose (mg)
`428-570 mg/kg/day
`
`HPN-100 PBA
`Equivalent
`Dose (mL)
`0.39-0.52 mL/kg/day
`
`94-12.4 g/m2/day
`
`8.6-11.2 mL/m2/day
`
`Maximum Daily
`Dose: 19 g
`
`17.4 mL
`
`0027. The present invention can use prodrugs of the for
`mula (I):
`
`(I)
`
`H
`
`H
`
`H
`
`H
`
`H
`
`O-R
`
`O-R
`
`O-R
`
`0028 wherein R. R. and Rs are independently, H.
`
`(CH2)
`O
`
`O
`
`(C mH2n-2)
`
`0029 and n is Zero or an even number, m is an even
`number and at least one of R, R2, and R is not H. For
`each R, R2, or R, norm is independently selected, so
`the R, R2, and R groups in a compound of formula I do
`not have to be identical. The preferred compounds are
`those wherein none of R, R2, and R is H. and fre
`quently each norm for a particular embodiment is the
`same, i.e., R. R. and R are all the same. The advantage
`over the prior art of decreased dosage is greater with
`Such triesters, and having all three acyl groups the same
`reduces issues related to mixtures of isomers. Moreover,
`
`(CH2)
`
`O
`
`(CnH2n-2)
`
`0033 and n is zero or an even number, and m is an even
`number.
`0034. In Formula II, R can be, for example, ethyl, propyl,
`isopropyl. n-butyl, and the like.
`0035. The compounds of the invention are esters of the
`congeners of phenylalkanoic and phenylalkenoic acids hav
`ing an even number of carbon atoms in the alkanoic acid
`portion, which include phenylacetic acid esters and those of
`phenylbutyric acid, etc., which can be converted by efficient
`beta-Oxidation processes to phenylacetic acid in the body.
`They are thus prodrugs for phenylacetic acid. Where n is 2 or
`4, the esters are also prodrugs for phenylbutyric acid. Prefer
`ably the alkylene oralkenylene carboxylate group contains 24
`or fewer carbon atoms, so n or m is less than 24. In some
`embodiments, n and mare 0, 2, 4 or 6, and in Some preferred
`embodiments in or m is 2.
`0036 Certain preferred embodiments of the invention use
`HPN-100 (Formula III):
`
`(III)
`
`O
`
`O
`
`H
`
`H
`
`H
`
`H
`
`H
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`0037 Total daily dosage of prodrugs like sodium PBA can
`often be selected according to the amount needed to provide
`
`Page 19 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`Jan. 14, 2010
`
`an appropriate amount of the active species, if that amount is
`known or can be determined. PBA is a prodrug for PAA:
`therefore, an initial dose of PBA could be selected if an
`effective dosage of PAA were known, taking into account the
`fraction of PBA that is converted into PAA and ultimately into
`PAGN. If a subject has been treated with PAA or a prodrug
`that forms PAA in the body, the amount of the previously used
`drug that was effective provides a possible starting point for
`selecting a dosage of a new prodrug of PAA. In this same
`patient, after the new prodrug is administered at the expected
`PAA dose equivalence, the PAA levels in the subject could be
`monitored and the dose of the prodrug adjusted until the same
`plasma level of PAA that was effective with the previous
`treatment is achieved. However, the current invention is based
`in part on finding that plasma PAA and PBA levels are not
`well correlated with the dose of a PBA prodrug administered
`or with ammonia elimination; for monitoring a dosing level of
`a PBA prodrug, one should not rely upon these parameters to
`assess the effectiveness of the prodrug. While not bound by
`the underlying theory, explanations for this effect (i.e. the
`inconsistent relationship between ammonia Scavenging and
`PBA and/or PAA blood levels) are provided herein.
`0038. The following Table provides data from three clini
`cal test groups showing the inconsistent relationship between
`plasma PAA and PBA levels among healthy volunteers,
`patients with cirrhosis and UCD patients, despite that fact
`that, as described in detail below, all groups exhibited similar
`ammonia Scavenging activity based on urinary excretion of
`PAGN. Overall, this shows that urinary PAGN provides a
`convenient method for monitoring ammonia elimination
`induced by the administered drug, which does not require
`drawing blood and directly relates to the actual nitrogen
`elimination provided by the administered nitrogen Scaveng
`ing drug without being influenced by the many other factors
`that can affect plasma ammonia levels.
`
`Plasma Pharmacokinetics of PBA, PAA, and PAGN Comparison across
`Studies
`
`AUC24
`TV2
`Tina
`Cna
`(g himL)
`(h)
`(h)
`(ig/mL)
`Treatment
`Analyte
`Healthy Volunteers (Single Dose - 3 g/m/day PBA Mole Equivalent)
`
`PBA
`
`PAA
`
`PAGN
`
`PBA
`
`PAA
`
`PAGN
`
`Sodium PBA
`221.0
`O.9
`0.7
`542.6
`HPN-100
`37.0
`2.4
`1.9
`137.2
`Sodium PBA
`58.8
`3.9
`1.2
`279.8
`HPN-100
`14.9
`4.0
`NC
`70.9
`Sodium PBA
`63.1
`3.2
`1.7
`395.1
`HPN-100
`30.2
`4.0
`NC
`262.1
`Healthy Volunteers and Cirrhotic Patients (100 mg/kg BID)"
`Child-Pugh A
`42.8
`2.3
`1.2
`131.7
`Child-Pugh B
`4.1.8
`2.9
`3.4
`1895
`Child-Pugh C
`44.3
`3.1
`1.9
`1921
`Volunteers
`29.8
`3.0
`2.1
`132.7
`Child-Pugh A
`33.2
`3.8
`1.8
`1688
`Child-Pugh B
`30.8
`4.5
`2.8
`2S2.4
`Child-Pugh C
`53.1
`4.8
`7.7
`579.9
`Volunteers
`25.5
`3.6
`1.9
`13 O.S
`Child-Pugh A
`37.7
`3.9
`S.O
`335.1
`Child-Pugh B
`38.1
`4.0
`7.5
`466.99
`Child-Pugh C
`43.1
`5.3
`4.0
`578.4
`Volunteers
`46.3
`4.3
`7.2
`550.9
`UCD Subjects (Multiple Dose - PBA Mole Equivalent)
`
`PBA
`
`Sodium PBA
`HPN-100
`
`1410
`70.1
`
`2.1
`6.1
`
`NC
`NC
`
`739.0
`S4O.O
`
`-continued
`
`Plasma Pharmacokinetics of PBA, PAA, and PAGN Comparison across
`Studies
`
`Analyte
`
`Treatment
`
`PAA
`
`PAGN
`
`Sodium PBA
`HPN-100
`Sodium PBA
`HPN-100
`
`Coax.
`(Lig/mL)
`
`Ta
`(h)
`
`53.0
`4O.S
`83.3
`71.9
`
`8.1
`8.O
`7.2
`8.O
`
`TV2
`(h)
`
`NC
`NC
`3.9
`4.8
`
`AUC24
`(g himL)
`
`595.6
`S74.6
`1133.0
`1098.0
`
`C = maximum plasma concentration;
`T = time of maximum plasma concentration;
`AUC = AUC from time 0 to 24 hours;
`NC = not calculated
`'Study did not include a sodium phenylbutyrate comparator arm, values rep
`resent HPN-100 dosing only. AUC values represent the AUC from time 0 to
`the last measurable plasma concentration.
`0039. One embodiment of the invention is a method for
`determining and/or adjusting the dose of ammonia Scaveng
`ing drugs in patients with UCDs, whereby dose would be
`based on the amount of dietary protein the patient is consum
`ing, the anticipated percentage conversion of the drug to
`PAGN, and the patient's residual urea synthetic capacity, if
`any. Dose adjustments, if necessary, would be based on the
`observed urinary excretion of PAGN and/or total urinary
`nitrogen (TUN), the difference between the two reflecting the
`patient's endogenous capacity for waste nitrogen excretion.
`This endogenous capacity may be absent in certain patients
`having innate urea cycle disorders due to inborn metabolic
`deficiencies, but patients with later-onset nitrogen accumula
`tion disorders generally have some endogenous capacity,
`referred to sometimes as their residual urea synthesis capac
`ity. See Brusilow, PROGRESS IN LIVER DISEASES, Ch. 12, pp.
`293-309 (1995). The subject's plasma ammonia level may
`also be determined; this is a critical parameter for tracking
`effectiveness of an overall treatment program, but reflects a
`variety of factors such as dietary protein and physiological
`stress, as well as the effect of a drug used to promote nitrogen
`excretion.
`0040. Once the patient's residual endogenous capacity for
`waste nitrogen excretion has been determined, either as the
`difference between PAGN output and total nitrogen output or
`as total urinary nitrogen output in the absence of an ammonia
`Scavenging drug, the tolerable amount of dietary protein can
`be calculated for that patient according to the dosage of the
`ammonia Scavenging drug being administered, or the dosage
`of the ammonia Scavenging drug can be adjusted or calculated
`to compensate for an estimated protein intake.
`0041 Another embodiment is a method for determining
`and adjusting the dose of an ammonia Scavenging drug to be
`administered to a patient with liver disease, including hepatic
`encephalopathy, whereby the starting dose would be based on
`the amount of dietary protein the patient is consuming, the
`anticipated conversion of the drug to PAGN, and the patient's
`residual urea synthetic capacity, if any. While the urea Syn
`thetic capacity in patients with liver disease would generally
`be greater than for patients with UCDs, considerable patient
`to patient variability would be expected among both groups
`depending, respectively, on the severity of their liver disease
`and the severity of their inherited enzymatic defect. Dose
`adjustments based on the observed urinary excretion of
`PAGN and total waste nitrogen would adjust for these indi
`vidual patient characteristics.
`
`Page 20 of 39
`
`LUPIN EX. 1007
`
`

`

`US 2010/0008859 A1
`
`Jan. 14, 2010
`
`0042 Another embodiment is a method for determining or
`adjusting allowable dietary protein in the diet of a patient with
`UCD or with hepatic encephalopathy, who is being treated
`with an oral PAA-forming ammonia Scavenging drug,
`whereby the amount of allowable protein would be deter
`mined by the amount of PAGN and total nitrogen in the urine.
`The difference between total waste nitrogen in the urine and
`the amount of PAGN excreted is indicative of the patient’s
`endogenous waste nitrogen processing capacity. Once the
`patient's endogenous nitrogen processing capacity is known,
`the patient's endogenous nitrogen processing capacity can be
`used to adjust dietary protein intake while administering a
`fixed dosage of an ammonia Scavenging drug, or the dosage of
`the ammonia Scavenging drug can be determined according to
`the amount needed to facilitate elimination of the waste nitro
`gen from the patient's dietary protein. Dietary protein intake
`should be determined or adjusted according to how much
`nitrogen the Subject can eliminate above the amount that is
`eliminated as PAGN, which results from the PAA-forming
`ammonia Scavenging drug being administered. When making
`these calculations or adjustments, it is Suitable to assume that
`about 47% of nitrogen in protein will become waste nitrogen
`that needs to be excreted in the urine (the amount may be less
`for growing patients, who retain a greater fraction of ingested
`nitrogen to support body growth), and that about 16% of
`protein, on average, is nitrogen (see Brusilow 1991).
`0043. It has generally been assumed for such determina
`tions that a prodrug would be converted with 100% efficiency
`into PAGN for elimination see, e.g., Berry et al., J. Pediatrics
`138(1), S56-S61 (2001) where FIG. 1 assumes 100% conver
`sion;andone report found that about 80-90% of PAA or PBA
`was excreted from a specific individual as PAGN. Brusilow,
`Pediatric Research 29(2), 147-150 (1991). It has now been
`found that HPN-100 and phenylbutyrate are both converted
`into urinary PAGN at an overall efficiency of about 60% to
`about 75% on average (about 60% conversion efficiency was
`seen in UCD patients and about 75% conversion was seen in
`cirrhotic patients, for example); consequently, this efficiency
`factor can be used to more accurately calculate or determine
`initial dosing levels for these drugs, or dietary protein levels
`acceptable for patients who use these drugs. Given this con
`version rate, each gram of HPN-100 can facilitate elimination
`of waste nitrogen from about a gram (~1.3 grams) of dietary
`protein per day. Note that PAGN carries away two molecules
`of ammonia per molecule of PAGN. Examples of calculations
`based on these parameters are provided in Examples 9 and 10
`herein.
`0044. In one aspect, the invention provides a method for
`transitioning a patient from phenylacetate or phenylbutyrate
`to HPN-100 or other esters or prodrugs of phenylbutyrate.
`The method involves administering an initial dosage of the
`prodrug that is selected based on the patient’s current dosage
`of phenylacetate orphenylbutyrate, and is adjusted according
`to the levels of excreted PAGN that result when the prodrug is
`administered.
`0045. In some embodiments, the transition from phenyl
`butyrate might be undertaken in more than a single step and
`urinary excretion of PAGN and total nitrogen would allow
`monitoring of ammonia Scavenging during the transition (e.g.
`for clinically fragile patients with a propensity for frequent
`hyperammonemia). The methods can use two, three, four,
`five, or more than five steps as judged clinically prudent. At
`each step, a fraction of the initial dosage of phenylbutyrate
`corresponding to the number of steps used for the transition is
`
`replaced by an appropriate, amount (i.e. the amount necessary
`to deliver an equimolar amount of PBA) of HPN-100 or other
`prodrug of phenylbutyrate, e.g., if the transition is to be done
`in three steps, about one-third of the phenylbuty

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket