throbber
Current strategies for the management of neonatal
`urea cycle disorders
`
`[Hardball Sum/mu; MD
`
`The treatment of newborns with urea cycle disorders has evolved over the
`
`years into a complex multidisciplinary effort. The complexity derives from
`the number of issues that must be addressed simultaneously. At the Urea
`
`
`
`Cycle Disorders Consensus Meeting held in Washington, D.C., a panel of
`physicians and other professionals with extensive experience in this field
`was assembled to bring some systematization to this task. This manuscript
`is a condensation of the collective opinion and experience of that group. The
`outcome of untreated or poorly treated patients with urea cycle disorders is
`universally bad. Although a favorable outcome is not always feasible, even
`with the best therapy, the methods outlined here should help treat such a
`patient by drawing on the experience of others who have treated patients
`with urea cycle disorders. This article does not purport to be the final word
`in treating children with these disorders. However, by establishing some
`common ground, new methods can be tried and compared with existing
`ones. In a future that holds the prospect of gene therapy I'cures" for these
`diseases, striving for the best possible outcome in the critical newborn peri-
`od is a worthy goal. (J Pediatr 2001;158:850-559)
`
`Neonatal hyperammonemia is a med-
`ical emergency requiring advanced
`planning, sophisticated facilities, and
`multidisciplinary teamwork. Urea
`cycle disorders are the primary cause
`of hyperammonemia during the vul-
`nerable newborn period. Genetic de-
`fects in any of the first 4 enzymes of
`the pathway (carbamyl phosphate syn-
`thetase I, ornithine transcarbamylase,
`argininosuccinic
`acid
`synthetase,
`argininosuccinic acid Iyase), or a co-
`factor producer (N-acetyl glutamate
`
`synthase) result in accumulations of
`precursor metabolites including am-
`monia (Fig 1). Because there is no ef-
`fective secondary clearance system for
`ammonia, disruption of this pathway
`has a rapid clinical course. The catabo-
`lism normally present in the newborn
`period together with the immaturity of
`the liver combine to accentuate defects
`
`in these enzymes. This rapid accumu-
`lation of ammonia and other precursor
`metabolites results in acute cerebral
`
`edema with severe neurologic compro-
`
`1"/wn I/h‘ Div/«hm if/IIMM'H/ Gruehlw, Drymrhnmf 13f PIJIIIIN‘I'L‘J ambllu/rcu/m‘ P/Jyulh/uyy 0’ BIin/Iymlv, Vander-
`IIi/l (”Him/wry.M'r’mz/ Calm; Min/wills, Trmwnrg.
`Reprint Requests: Marshall Summar, MD, Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pedi-
`atrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, DD 2205 MCN, Nashville, TN 57252-2578.
`Copyright © 2001 by Mosby, Inc.
`0022-5476/2001/$55.00 + 0
`9/0/111854
`
`doi:10.1067/mpd.2001.111854
`
`530
`
`1 of 10
`
`mise.1'5 Thus fast and effective treat-
`
`ment is key to improving the patient's
`outcome.
`
`A clear, concise protocol is required
`to treat neonates with severe hyperam-
`monemia caused by UCDs. In review-
`ing the experience ofa number of clin-
`icians who have cared for
`these
`
`patients, several stages of treatment
`become apparent. These include (1)
`recognition and supportive treatment,
`(2) bulk ammonia removal and phar-
`macologic scavenging, (5) stabilization
`and catabolic reversal, and (4) transi-
`tion to home management. These steps
`are undertaken to accomplish specific
`therapeutic goals and include rapidly
`clearing ammonia from the neonate's
`bloodstream, blocking the production
`of additional ammonia, removing ex-
`cess nitrogen, and protecting the neu-
`rologic integrity of the baby. All of
`these goals should be pursued with
`thoughtful expediency in the context
`of the patients clinical situation.
`
`ASL
`ASS
`CPS
`ECMO
`
`Argininosuccinic acid lyase
`Argininosuccinic acid synthetase
`Carbamyl phosphate synthetase |
`Extracorporeal membrane
`oxygenation
`ECMO/HD Extracorporeal membrane
`oxygenation driving a
`hemodialysis machine
`N-acetyl glutamate synthase
`Nasogastric
`Nasojejunal
`Ornithine transcarbamylase
`Urea cycle disorder
`
`NAGS
`NG
`NJ
`OTC
`UCD
`
`During each stage of management
`there are a number of critical elements
`
`to consider, including what is being
`done, what are the results, and what
`remains to be done. This article is an
`
`attempt to provide guidance on the
`Horizon Exhibit 2005
`Horizon Exhibit 2005
`Lupin v. Horizon
`Lupin v. Horizon
`IPR2018-00459
`|PR2018-00459
`
`1 of 10
`
`

`

`THEJOURNALOFPEDMTNCS
`VOLUMEl38,NUMBERl
`
`SUMMAR
`
`Benzoale
`
`NH"4
`ot-Ketoglutarnte
`Glycine .‘_____.. NH"!I _\-pGlutamate $+Glutamine Phenylacetate 4—Phenylbutyrate
`Y Hco3
`
`ATP
`
`CPS
`
`
`
`Phenylacetylglutmnine
`
`Carbamyl p wsplime
`
`
`
`Omithinc
`
`Citrulline
`
`Aspartatc
`
`AS
`
`I|
`
`Ii
`
`I
`III
`F
`
`I!tII
`
`Argininosuccinate
`
`Argimse
`
`AL
`
`Arginine
`
`”xv
`
`Fumumle
`
`Supplemented — - "'
`arginine
`
`Fly 1. Urea cycle and intermediate components.
`
`specifics of treating a patient with
`neonatal hyperammonemia.
`
`RECOGNITION AND
`
`SUPPORTIVE
`
`TREATMENT
`
`Once neonatal hyperammonemia is
`recognized, the necessary organization
`and supportive care are initiated to re-
`verse it as soon as possible.
`
`CLbukallewwnhahbn
`
`In the immediate newborn period,
`infants with UCDs will typically look
`normal. The problems that may have
`been observed while the child was still
`
`in hospital are often not seen until the
`child is at home because of the current
`
`practice of discharging the mother and
`newborn baby early. This places much
`of the burden of recognition on the
`family and the pediatrician or primary
`care physician. The typical
`initial
`symptoms of a child with hyperam-
`monemia, failure to feed, and somno-
`
`lence may not be recognized by new
`parents. As a result, advice and care is
`sought later when the child’s illness has
`progressed to become more severe.
`The progression of symptoms moves
`from somnolence, through lethargy,
`and on to coma. There is a loss of ther-
`
`moregulation with a low core tempera-
`ture and feeding disruption that corre-
`lates with the somnolence.
`
`Abnormal posturing and encepha-
`lopathy are often related to the degree
`of central nervous system swelling and
`
`pressure on the brain stem.4'5 Seizures
`are seen in approximately 50% of se—
`verely hyperammonemic neonates.
`Hyperventilation caused by cerebral
`edema causes a respiratory alkalosis
`that is also a common symptom in the
`early stages of the hyperammonemic
`attack. This progresses to hypoventila-
`tion and respiratory arrest as pressure
`increases on the brain stem.6'7
`
`The algorithm in Fig 2 may assist
`with the evaluation ofa hyperammone-
`mic newborn, but outside factors can
`
`influence the differential diagnosis.
`Factors such as the overall health of
`
`the duration of hyperam-
`the liver,
`monemia, and pharmacologic agents
`already given to the patient should be
`factored into the interpretation ofthe
`clinical observations.
`
`S3l
`
`20f10
`
`2 of 10
`
`

`

`SUMMAR
`
`THEJOURNALOFPEDMINCS
`JANUARYZOOI
`
`Diagnostic Considerations
`
`Symptomatic: lethargy, coma. etc.
`Lab: blood ammonia
`
`
`
`Elevaled
`
`
`>approx. loouMoi/L
`Lab: anion gap. glucose, blood and urine kelones
`
`
`
`
`I
`Other Metabolic Disorders
`Anlon gap >20 and/or hypoglycemia, and/or kelones
`Lab: organic acids. amino acids, carnlllne elc.
`
`
`
`|
`Primary Urea Cycle Delecl
`
`
`
`Anion gap <20. glucose normal, low kelones
`Lab: plasma/urine amino and urine organic acids
`
`
`
`THAN or NAGS. CPS or OTC Deliciency
`
`Normal or Low Cilrulline
`
`ASD
`ALD
`
`THAN or NAGS or CPSD
`OTC Deliciency
`Absent Argininosuccinate
`Elevated Argininosuccinale
`
`Elevated Orolale
`
`
`Low or Normal Orolele
`Lab: libroblasl
`Lab: libroblast or red
`Lab: biopsy or DNA
`Lab: biopsy or DNA
`enzyme ass av
`cell an: me assay
`
`
`
`ASD or ALD
`Elevated Citrulline
`
`F1312. Algorithm for encephalopathic newborns.
`
`Table I. Diagnostic laboratory tests
`
`Table II. Laboratory measurements in acutely ill infants without UCD
`
`Ammonia
`
`pH and CO2
`Plasma quantitative amino acids
`Anion gap
`Glucose
`
`Urine organic acids and orotic acid
`Specific enzymatic or DNA analysis
`
`Laboratory data useful in the diagno-
`sis of UCDs include plasma ammonia
`
`levels, pH, C02, the anion gap, plasma
`amino acids, and urine organic acid
`analyses. Table 1 lists the recommended
`diagnostic tests, and Fig 2 highlights
`their use. The clinician should remem-
`
`ber that treatment should begin before
`a final diagnosis is made, and that later
`stages of treatment should be tailored
`to the specific disorder (Table I).
`An elevated plasma ammonia level of
`150 umol/L or higher, associated with
`a normal anion gap and a normal blood
`glucose level, is a strong indication for
`the presence ofa UCD. Quantitative
`amino acid analysis can be used to
`evaluate these patients and arrive at a
`tentative diagnosis. The amino acids in
`sick newborns are often quite different
`from those in children and adults, and
`
`....Earamst9r...............................................Average............................................$9..............................
`
`Ammonia
`Glutamine
`Glycine
`Alanine
`Citrulline
`Arginine
`
`47 ilmol/L
`581
`502
`519
`10.5
`38.5
`
`(15.5)
`(182)
`(100)
`(252)
`(7)
`(18.4)
`
`Averaged results from 25 babies admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.
`All babies were 55 weeks' gestation with respiratory problems (birth asphyxia, respiratory dis-
`tress, or meconium aspiration syndrome).
`
`Table 11 lists some of our averaged val-
`ues obtained in sick, term newborns
`
`without UCDs. The required diagnos-
`tic laboratory tests and their interpre-
`tation are discussed in more detail else-
`
`where in this supplement.
`In summary,
`infants with a UCD
`often have an initial normal appear-
`ance that progresses to lethargy and
`coma with the associated features of
`
`anorexia, hyperventilation, hypother-
`mia, hypoventilation, seizures, neuro-
`logic posturing, and other features of
`cerebral edema.
`
`Early Supportive Care
`These are the initial treatment steps
`that should be implemented as soon as
`
`the patient is suspected of having a
`urea cycle defect. They can be per—
`formed while the patient is being pre-
`pared for transport to a metabolic cen-
`ter or being prepared for dialysis or
`pharmacologic management. Before
`care is initiated, some thought should
`be given to the severity of the patient's
`condition and to the probable long-
`term outcome. Patients who have been
`
`in a hyperammonemic coma for sever-
`al days have an extremely poor neuro-
`logic outcome. Although the patient
`may be successfully "detoxified" and
`stabilized, the damage to the central
`nervous system is likely to be devastat-
`ing and permanent. Thus the option of
`withdrawal of support should be dis-
`
`S32
`
`3 of 10
`
`3 of 10
`
`

`

`THEJOURNALOFPEDMINCS
`VOLUME|38,NUMBER|
`
`cussed with parents of patients who
`have already sustained overwhelming
`damage to the brain.
`Intravenous access should be estab-
`
`lished as soon as possible. If practical,
`the patient with a UCD should have a
`deep line placed such as an umbilical
`catheter or a multilumen central line.
`
`The need to resume feedings rapidly
`should influence the selection of line
`
`type. Stable vascular access will assist
`with the administration of fluids, med-
`
`ications, and the frequent blood sam-
`pling. Many patients with UCDs are
`dehydrated at presentation as a result
`of anorexia and poor oral
`intake.
`Restoration of normal hydration will
`serve to protect renal function (critical
`for effective treatment) and ensure ad-
`
`equate tissue perfusion (to blunt the
`further catabolic production of nitro-
`gen). Overhydration should be avoid-
`ed because most patients with UCDs
`have some degree of cerebral swelling.
`Intravenous administration of fluids
`
`with 10% dextrose with one quarter
`normal saline solution is preferable
`to physiological saline solution, be-
`cause patients treated with ammonia-
`scavenging drugs will receive large
`amounts of sodium and chloride ions
`
`as part of their medication regimen.
`Other support
`(pressors, buffering
`agents), depending on the cardiovas-
`cular and acid-balance status of the in-
`
`fant, is also important. Protection of
`kidney function is an important aspect
`of the early treatment ofthese patients.
`Many have depleted intravascular vol-
`umes and go into shock and have acute
`renal failure. Once the dialysis phase is
`complete, the drugs used to scavenge
`excess ammonia from the bloodstream
`
`require normal renal function. The use
`of boluses of fluid and pressor agents
`should be balanced against the degree
`of cerebral edema present at the time.
`Oncotic agents such as albumin will
`contribute to the overall nitrogen load
`but in selected cases, and on a limited
`basis, can be used.
`
`Caloric supplementation should be
`maximized to try and reverse catabo-
`
`lism and nitrogen turnover. In addition
`to glucose, Intralipid administration
`can provide additional calories but
`should not be
`allowed to delay
`progress toward more aggressive treat-
`ment. Oral feedings should be discon-
`tinued in patients with severe en-
`cephalopathy but restarted as soon as
`practical. Placement of a nasogastric
`tube should be done during this early
`phase. Feeding of all protein should be
`halted temporarily and calories provid-
`ed as carbohydrate and fat. For pa-
`tients who are able to tolerate oral
`
`feedings, a protein-free formula such
`as Mead Johnson 80056 or Ross For-
`
`mula ProPhree could initially be used.
`Elemental formulas are not appropri-
`ate because they contain considerable
`amounts of nitrogen. This complete re-
`striction of protein should be main-
`tained only for a short period (24 to 48
`hours), because depletion of essential
`amino acids will result in further pro—
`tein catabolism and nitrogen release.
`The author has found that maximizing
`caloric intake has a significant impact
`on patient stabilization after bulk am-
`monia removal.
`Even an infant who is awake and re-
`
`sponsive can progress to coma and car-
`diovascular or respiratory collapse
`during transport or preparation for
`dialysis. Therefore it is preferable to
`perform intubation on infants with
`borderline clinical condition before
`
`transport or before they have respira-
`tory compromise for 2 reasons: (I) ifa
`patient is breathing rapidly (respirato-
`ry alkalosis driven by cerebral edema),
`excess calories are burned, contribut-
`
`ing to catabolism and further nitrogen
`accumulation, and (2) intubation is a
`difficult procedure to carry out while
`an infant is being transported and can
`lead to hypoxia.
`It is usual for a lethargic infant to
`have undergone a septic workup with
`the initiation of antibiotic treatment.
`
`SUMMAR
`
`ing it as prophylaxis. A bacterial infec-
`tion in a newborn baby with hyperam-
`monemia could well prove fatal.
`There are several other important
`measures to be taken when caring for
`these infants. Hyperventilation is rec-
`ommended and steroids are to be
`
`avoided, because they will increase the
`amount of protein turnover and hence
`increase the nitrogen load. Mannitol
`has not been demonstrated to be effec-
`
`tive in managing cerebral edema
`caused by hyperammonemia.
`The importance of early treatment
`cannot be overstressed. Ultimately the
`neurologic dysfunction of the patient is
`related to the duration of cerebral
`edema.7'10 Most children will have
`
`cognitive impairment, but early treat—
`ment to remove ammonia and other
`metabolites from the bloodstream will
`
`lessen the severity of this impairment.
`
`Organization an? Mobilization
`Newborns with UCDs should be
`
`treated by a team of experienced per—
`sonnel and in facilities with special re-
`sources (Table III). The community
`physicians should be aware ofthese fa-
`cilities and how to reach them. A meta-
`
`bolic specialist should coordinate the
`activities of the various team members
`
`and maintain continuity of treatrrient.
`As with any team approach, the roles
`of the members and the steps and goals
`of treatment should be clear before a
`
`patient with a UCD presents for treat-
`ment.
`In addition to alerting team
`members of the impending arrival of a
`patient with a UCD,
`the managing
`physician should also alert the labora-
`tory regarding STAT tests. The phar-
`macy should also be alerted to ensure
`that the specific medications are avail-
`able and can be prepared at short no—
`tice. Human subject permits should al-
`ready be on hand, because treatment
`with intravenous sodium phenylac-
`etate and sodium benzoate is still con-
`
`With the heavy instrumentation and
`stress patients with UCD undergo, it is
`probably prudent to continue existing
`antibiotic coverage or consider initiat-
`
`sidered experimental and is under an
`FDA investigational new drug permit
`(contact Ucyclyd Pharmaceuticals for
`details). We have found that having
`
`S33
`
`4of10
`
`4 of 10
`
`

`

`SUMMAR
`
`Table III. Treatment team members and roles and responsibilities
`
`Team member
`
`Metabolic specialist
`Pharmacy
`
`Nephrologist or dialysis team
`Intensive care team
`
`Surgical team
`
`Laboratory staff
`
`Nutritionist
`
`Coordinate treatment and management.
`Formulate ammonia scavenging and
`dialysis agents. Check dosing orders.
`Dialysis
`Assist with physiological support, pain
`management, and ventilator
`management.
`Catheter placement for hemo- and
`peritoneal dialysis. Obtain biopsy
`sample for diagnostic testing.
`Ammonia, amino acids, and organic
`acids
`
`Establish dietary prescription with
`metabolic foods and supplements.
`Assist with parenteral calorie
`management and transition
`to enteral feeding.
`
`the medications from the pharmacy
`ahead of time and having blood hand-
`delivered to the chemistry laboratory
`saves considerable critical time. Delays
`in treatment or response to changing
`status may affect the eventual outcome
`(Table III).
`
`Bulk Ammonia Removal an?
`
`P/zarmacologic Ammonia
`Scaveuging
`
`The best way to remove ammonia
`rapidly is by dialysis.7'll‘15 Keeping
`ammonia
`from reaccumulating is
`achieved through the use of nitrogen
`scavenger drugs, discussed in detail
`elsewhere in this supplement. Loading
`with scavenger drugs should be done
`as soon as possible if urine output is
`adequate. Exchange transfusion is in-
`effective in removing ammonia, and
`dialysis is the treatment of choice for
`rapid removal of this toxin.7'11'13
`
`Preparation for Diaiydid
`Dialysis is the primary means by
`which ammonia is removed from the
`
`immediately. If dialysis is not immedi-
`ately available, it is appropriate to use a
`loading dose of drugs to induce the re-
`moval of ammonia. However, in the pa-
`tient with severe hyperammonemia,
`pharmacologic agents are not sufficient
`to remove ammonia quickly.
`The method of dialysis chosen de-
`pends on the available expertise and
`equipment. The fastest removal system
`uses an extracorporeal membrane oxy-
`genation pump system to drive a he-
`modialysis machine.l2'l‘l‘15 ECMO has
`become more Widely available because
`ofits use in infant lung disease and car-
`diac surgery. Other methods include
`hemoflltration (both arteriovenous and
`venovenous), standard dialysis, peri-
`toneal
`dialysis,
`and
`continuous-
`drainage peritoneal dialysis. Each
`method has its own advantages and
`drawbacks.l2'l4'18 Because ammonia
`
`crosses the dialysis membrane rapidly,
`the faster the flow rate, the higher the
`clearance. In critically ill newborns it
`is difficult to perform standard dialysis
`for more than a few hours and main-
`
`patient's body during the early manage-
`ment period. Ideally, the surgical and
`dialysis teams should be waiting for the
`patient to arrive and initiate treatment
`
`tain homeostasis. Peritoneal dialysis
`clears ammonia at a low rate of 5 to 5
`mL/min, and if it is the sole means of
`
`ammonia removal, it may take several
`
`534
`
`5 of 10
`
`THEJOURNALOFPEDMTNCS
`JANUARYZOOI
`
`days to reduce a significant ammonia
`burden.12 Peritoneal dialysis also com-
`plicates attempts at early refeeding and
`increases the risk of infection. Howev-
`
`er, peritoneal dialysis may be the most
`widely available form of toxin removal
`and does not require an entire dialysis
`team. A variation of peritoneal dialysis
`with continuous inflow and outflow is
`
`effective but requires extremely close
`monitoring. Hemofiltration produces
`clearance rates of 10 to 50 mL/min,
`and clearance rates with ECMO/HD
`are on the order of 170 to 200
`
`mL/min.12 With the advent of percuta-
`neous catheter placement for ECMO
`and the increased pump rates avail-
`able,
`the advantages of this method
`may outweigh the risk of blood vessel
`damage. Another advantage to the use
`of an ECMO pump is that a hemofilter
`can be placed in the circuit to continue
`removal of ammonia between dialysis
`runs. We have demonstrated reduc-
`
`tions of blood ammonia levels by >1000
`umol/L in a period of I to 2 hours with
`ECMO/I-ID.12 Osmotic shifts have not
`
`been observed with this rapid dialysis,
`and recovery of neurologic activity is
`faster. For patients with less severe hy-
`perammonemia, a hemofiltration pump
`may suffice for bulk ammonia removal.
`
`A review of the literature suggests that
`approximately 50% of the neonates re-
`quiring dialysis for any reason under-
`go dialysis with a pressure-supported
`system. The extensive amount of in-
`strumentation arising from the use of
`any of these methods increases the risk
`of infection, and prophylactic antibiot-
`ic coverage should be considered for
`all patients.
`Dialysis seems to become less effec-
`tive when the plasma ammonia level
`falls below 200 umol/L and can be dis-
`continued. Once dialysis is stopped,
`and while the patient is still in the acute
`phase, there may be a rebound of sever-
`al hundred umol in the ammonia level.
`This reflects both the continued cata-
`
`bolic state of the patient with the conse—
`quent production of waste nitrogen and
`the time required for the nitrogen scav—
`
`5 of 10
`
`

`

`THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
`VOLUME I38. NUMBER I
`
`enging medications to take effect. The
`use of hemofiltration can blunt or pre-
`vent this rebound. It is recommended
`
`that the catheters be removed only after
`the plasma ammonia level has been sta-
`ble for at least a day. However, this
`should be balanced by the risk of main-
`taining the patient in an anticoagulated
`state. Some patients may require more
`than one session of dialysis to bring the
`ammonia level under control. In summa-
`
`ry, it is recommended that patients with
`severe hyperammonemia be treated
`initially with pump-driven dialysis
`(ECMO/I—ID) followed by continuous
`hemofiltration with the same pump
`system. In patients who are hemody-
`namically unstable, this procedure offers
`pressure support and better control over
`dialysis flow rates. A further advantage
`is that enteral feeding through an NG or
`nasojejunal tube can be started.
`
`lermaeologic Management
`RATIONALE. The second line of the
`
`treatment for acute hyperammonemia
`involves the use of compounds that re—
`move nitrogen by alternative path-
`ways. Phenylacetate combines with
`glutamine to produce phenylacetylglu-
`tamine, a compound that is excreted in
`the urine.8'19 The scavenged glutamine
`is replaced by synthesis in muscle and
`liver, thus reducing the nitrogen load.
`In addition, glutamine has been impli-
`cated in the neurotoxicity of UCDs;
`therefore its elimination may have a
`more direct beneficial effectw‘25 Ben-
`
`zoate combines with glycine to pro-
`duce hippurate, which is also rapidly
`cleared by the kidneys.24'25 The
`glycine is replaced by synthesis, thus
`removing more waste nitrogen from
`the pool. While the precursor nitrogen
`is removed from circulation, attention
`
`must also be paid to replacing the defi-
`cient product(s) of the urea cycle (Fig
`l). CPS, NAGS, and OTC defects
`prevent
`the formation of citrulline
`from ornithine and carbamyl phos-
`phate. This in turn decreases the syn-
`thesis of arginine, resulting in it be-
`coming an essential amino acid. A
`
`6of10
`
`SUMMAR
`
`tration packaging for intravenous sodi-
`um benzoate/sodium phenylacetate
`and the protocols developed by Dr.
`Saul Brusilow.6'7'11 They are summa-
`rized in Table IV.
`
`Loaaing Dode
`The current protocol for the acute
`management of hyperammonemia in-
`cludes arginine hydrochloride (600
`mg/kg in a 10% solution), and a combi-
`nation of sodium benzoate and sodium
`
`phenylacetate (250 mg/kg of each
`drug), all infused in 25 to 55 mL/kg of
`10% dextrose in water over a 90-
`
`minute period. The blood pH should be
`monitored and buffer added to coun-
`
`teract the acidity of the arginine hy-
`drochloride. The dose of arginine has
`been increased from previous proto-
`cols, because a rapid infusion of argi-
`nine is believed to have a significant im-
`pact on patients with ASS and ASL
`deficiency and be relatively safe for pa-
`tients with OTC, CPS, and NAGS de-
`
`ficiency. Caution should be exercised if
`additional doses of sodium benzoate
`
`and sodium phenylacetate are given
`within 24 hours of the original dose,
`but experience suggests that 500 mg/kg
`each of sodium benzoate and sodium
`
`phenylacetate during the first 24 hours
`is an acceptable regimen (I loading
`dose + maintenance infusion). At 750
`mg/kg/24 h,
`there is some toxicity
`(vomiting, lethargy), and at >750 mg/
`kg/24 h, the toxicity is essentially in-
`variable and can be life-threatening.
`Reloading (repeating the initial regi-
`men) should be contemplated only in
`neonates with severe disorders or those
`
`who are undergoing dialysis and, based
`on the results of pharmacokinetic stud-
`ies, should be spaced at least 6 hours
`apart (refer to Dr. Batshaw's article
`elsewhere in this supplement for more
`extensive information on the pharma—
`cologic management of UCDS).
`
`block in ASS prevents the condensa-
`tion of aspartate with citrulline, which
`accounts for 50% of the nitrogen incor—
`porated into the pathway. ASL defi-
`ciency blocks conversion of argini—
`nosuccinate to arginine. Therefore
`arginine is also an essential amino acid
`in ASS and ASL deficiencies.26'27
`
`Even in ASS and ASL deficiency,
`where there is a partially intact urea
`cycle,
`the body rapidly depletes its
`pool of urea cycle intermediates into
`which it normally incorporates nitro-
`gen. Therefore arginine serves as a
`therapeutic agent in UCD. In CPS,
`NAGS, OTC, ASS, and ASL deficien-
`
`cy, arginine is used to restore its blood
`levels and prevent the breakdown of
`endogenous protein.26'27 In ASS and
`ASL deficiency it
`is used in larger
`amounts to "prime" the cycle to pro-
`duce
`citrulline
`or
`argininosucci-
`nate.24'28 This has the advantage ofin-
`corporating a substantial amount of
`nitrogen in compounds having a lower
`toxicity and higher renal excretion. In
`ASS (citrullinemia), 1 mol of nitrogen
`can be removed for every mole of argi-
`nine metabolized through the cycle, and
`this doubles in ASL to 2 mol.
`L—
`
`citrulline may serve as a better supple-
`ment for patients with OTC and CPS
`than arginine, because it is converted to
`arginine while promoting the incorpo-
`ration of one waste nitrogen; however,
`an intravenous formulation of citrulline
`
`is not currently available. A note of cau-
`tion concerning arginine. Arginine is a
`precursor of nitric oxide, a potent va-
`sodilator. Anecdotal evidence and the
`
`author's own experience suggest that
`in CPS and OTC deficiencies,
`large
`amounts of excess arginine may accu-
`mulate, resulting in overproduction of
`nitric oxide and leading to extreme
`vasodilation and hypotension.12 Reduc-
`tion in arginine administration corre-
`sponded with restored venous tone in 2
`patients cared for in our institution.
`
`Aaminidtration Protocol
`These dose recommendations are
`
`Maintenance Infwion
`Once the loading dose is given, the pa-
`tient should be switched to the mainte-
`
`based on the Food and Drug Adminis-
`
`nance infusion. The doses differ only in
`
`535
`
`6 of 10
`
`

`

`SUMMAR
`
`THEJOURNALOFPEDMINCS
`JANUARYZOOI
`
`TableIV. Recommended doses of pharmacologic agents to be used during dialysis periods
`
`Sodium benzoate/phenylacetate dosage and administration
`...............................................................................................................Summarytable
`
`....E§§i§.n§.299.9!a£i9.n.
`
`.........§.9_m29!19n.t§..9f.infusisn.salaries................
`
`................l29§ags.2r9yi9s§...........................
`
`SB/SA
`
`Arginine HCI
`
`Dextrose
`
`Sodium
`
`Sodium
`benzoate
`
`Neonates/Infants/Young children:
`Prospective treatment pending definitive diagnosis of urea cycle enzyme deficiency
`6.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`250 mg/kg
`250 mg/lcg
`2.5 mL/kg
`2.5 mL/kg
`6.0 mL/kg
`~ 25' mL/kg
`250 mg/kg
`250 mg/kg
`CPS or OTC Deficiency
`2.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`2.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`ASS or ASL deficiency
`6.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`6.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`
`Loading dose
`Maintenance dose
`
`Loading dose
`Maintenance dose
`
`2.5 mL/kg
`2.5 mL/kg
`
`Loading dose
`Maintenance dose
`Older children and adults:
`
`2.5 mL/kg
`2.5 mL/kg
`
`250' mg/kg
`250 mg/kg
`
`250 mg/kg
`250 mg/kg
`
`250 mg/kg
`250 mg/kg
`
`250 mg/kg
`250 mg/kg
`
`600 mg/kg
`600 mg/kg
`
`200 mg/kg
`200 mg/kg
`
`600 mg/kg
`600 mg/kg
`
`200 mg/kg
`200 mg/kg
`
`600 mg/kg
`600 mg/ltg°
`
`Loading dose
`Maintenance dose
`
`Loading dose
`Maintenance close
`
`55 mL/m2
`55 mL/m2
`
`55 mL/m2
`55 mL/m2
`
`SB, Sodium benzoate; SA, sodium phenylacetate.
`
`CPS or OTC deficiency
`2.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`2.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`ASS or ASL deficiency
`6.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`6.0 mL/kg
`~ 25 mL/kg
`
`5.5 g/m2
`5.5 g/m2
`
`5.5 g/m2
`5.5 g/m2
`
`5.5 g/m2
`5.5 g/m2
`
`5.5 g/m2
`5.5 g/m2
`
`the amount of arginine hydrochloride
`given and are dependent on the diagno-
`sis. The 24 -hour dose of the combination
`
`of sodium benzoate/sodium phenylac-
`etate is 250 mg/kg/24 h of each drug.
`For patients with CPS, OTC, or NAGS
`deficiency,
`the dose of arginine hy-
`drochloride is 200 mg/kg/24 h. For ASS
`and ASL deficiency the dose of arginine
`is 600 mg/kg/24 h. For patients awaiting
`diagnosis, the 200 mg/kg/24 h dose of
`arginine should be used in conjunction
`with sodium benzoate and sodium
`
`phenylacetate. Attention should be paid
`to the potassium level of the patient, and
`the maintenance fluids should have
`
`sodium
`because
`potassium added,
`phenylacetate may cause potassium de-
`pletion. The maintenance infusion is
`continued until a conversion to oral
`medication is made. Cerebral blood flow
`
`or electroencephalography analysis may
`be required to determine whether treat-
`ment should be discontinued.
`
`Laboratory Monitoring
`Our center measures ammonia plas-
`ma levels every hour during high-flow
`rate dialysis. These samples should be
`handled expeditiously to get the fastest
`possible turnaround. Once the ammo-
`nia plasma level has stabilized to <200
`to 300 umol/L,
`the monitoring fre-
`quency can be reduced to once every
`few hours. When the patient is receiv—
`ing a. stable drug regimen and no
`longer requires dialysis, the Frequency
`can be further reduced to every 12
`hours and to once-daily before dis-
`charge. During the acute phase, elec-
`trolytes and acid-base balance should
`be
`carefully monitored (every 4
`hours). Glucose should be monitored
`hourly in patients receiving a glucose/
`insulin infusion to avoid wide swings
`in glucose levels. Amino acids should
`be monitored on a daily basis to assess
`nutritional status and the effectiveness
`
`of glutamine removal and citrulline/
`
`arginine replacement. The amount of
`blood removed should be monitored
`and transfusion used to avoid iatro-
`
`genic anemia.
`
`Other Acute Treatment [muted
`
`Opinion is divided among experts
`on the use of glucose and insulin in
`these patients. Glucose and insulin can
`serve as suppressors of catabolism, but
`their use requires care. The consensus
`opinion at this meeting was to admin-
`ister 6 to 8 mg/kg/min of glucose (ad-
`ministered as 10% dextrose in water)
`and to use insulin sparingly to main-
`tain the serum glucose level <170
`mg/dL. The presence of glycosuria is
`an indication for continued adminis-
`
`tration of intravenous regular insulin
`at a rate that keeps glucose levels be—
`tween 120 and 170 mg/dL. Wide swings
`in glucose levels can change the osmo-
`lality of the brain and therefore should
`be avoided.
`
`535
`
`7 of 10
`
`7 of 10
`
`

`

`THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
`VOLUME I38, NUMBER |
`
`The use of normal saline solution
`
`should also be avoided, because the
`
`pharmacologic agents used in ammo-
`nia removal contain large amounts of
`sodium and chloride ions.
`The use of carnitine in neonates
`
`being treated with sodium benzoate is
`not believed to be beneficial. There
`have been no documented cases of car-
`
`nitine deficiency, even though carni-
`tine levels are low in these neonates,
`
`and carnitine is known to conjugate
`with sodium benzoate.
`
`Valproic acid should be avoided in
`any patient who has seizures. It is
`known to decrease urea cycle function
`and will aggravate the hyperammone-
`mia.29'31
`Enteral citrulline is used in some
`centers for neonates with UCD and
`
`CPS or OTC deficiencies, the rationale
`
`being that pulling aspartate into the
`pathway may increase nitrogen clear-
`ance. The dose of citrulline used is 150
`
`to 200 mg/kg/24 h. A clear diagnosis
`should be made before citrulline is
`
`used to avoid providing citrulline to
`patients with ASS and ASL who al-
`ready have excessive amounts of this
`amino acid.
`
`Staéilization an? Catabolic
`Reveraal
`
`This phase overlaps with the second
`phase to some extent. One of the keys
`to successful treatment of a patient
`with a UCD is to reverse the catabolic
`This
`process.
`decreases nitrogen
`turnover and

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket