throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Commissionerfor Patents
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`www. uspto.gov
`
`In Re: Patent Term Extension
`Application for
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,532,241
`
`MUL 3 0 2014
`
`“a
`
`
`
`Danielle L. Herritt
`McCarter & English LLP
`
`265 Franklin Street
`
`Boston, MA 02110
`
`Dear Ms. Herritt:
`
`A certificate under 35 U.S.C. § 156 is enclosed extending the term of U.S. Patent
`No. 5,532,241 for a period of 5 years. While a courtesy copyofthis letter is being forwarded to
`the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), you should directly correspond with the FDA
`regarding any required changesto the patent expiration dates set forth in the Patent and
`Exclusivity Data Appendix of the Orange Book (Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic
`Equivalence Evaluations) or in the Patent Information set forth in the Green Book (FDA
`—
`Approved Animal Drug Products). Effective August 18, 2003, patent submissions for
`publication in the Orange Book and Docket *95S-0117 need to be submitted on form FDA-3542
`which may be downloaded from FDA's Electronic Forms Download Website:
`http://www.fda.gov/opacom/morechoices/fdaforms/default.html
`" (http://www.fda.gov/opacom/morechoices/fdaforms/FDA-3542.pdf).
`
`Inquiries regarding this communication should be directed to the undersigned by telephone at
`(571) 272-7755, or by e-mail at mary.till@uspto.gov.
`e
`
`ary C. Till
`Senior Legal Advisor
`Office of Patent Legal Administration
`Office of the Associate Commissioner
`for Patent Examination Policy
`
`ce:
`
`Office of Regulatory Policy
`Food and Drug Administration
`10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6284
`Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
`
`RE: VIIBRYD® (vilozodone
`hydrochloride)
`Docket No.: FDA-2011-E-
`
`Attention: Beverly Friedman
`
`Argentum EX1022
`Argentum EX1022
`Page 1
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`(12)
`
`CERTIFICATE EXTENDING PATENT TERM
`UNDER35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`(68) PATENT NO.
`* (45)
`ISSUED
`
`|
`
`(75)
`
`INVENTOR
`
`(73) PATENT OWNER
`
`(95)
`
`PRODUCT
`
`.
`
`:
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`5,532,241
`July 2, 1996
`
`Henning Bottcheretal.
`
`Merck Patent Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter
`Haftung
`
`VIIBRYD®(vilozodone hydrochloride)
`
`This is to certify that an application under 35 U.S.C. § 156 has been filed in the United
`States Patent and Trademark Office, requesting extension ofthe term of U.S. Patent No.
`5,532,241 based upon the regulatory review of the product VIBRYD®(vilozodone
`hydrochloride) by the Food and Drug Administration. Since it appears that the
`requirementsofthe law have been met, this certificate extends the term ofthe patent for
`the period of
`
`(94)
`
`|
`
`5 years
`
`from September 29, 2014,the original expiration date ofthe patent, subject to the payment
`of maintenance fees as provided by law,with all rights pertaining thereto as provided by
`35 U.S.C. § 156.
`
`I have causedthe seal of the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office to be affixed this 24th day of July 2014.
`
`Michelle K. Lee
`;
`Deputy Under Secretary of Commercefor Intellectual Property and
`Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`
`
` NS we
`Ee PT
`
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARKOFFICE
`,
`
`Patents
`Commissionerfor
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`DanielleL. Herritt
`McCarter & English LLP
`265 Franklin Street
`Boston, MA 02110
`
`In Re: Patent Term Extension
`Application for
`U.S. Patent No. 5,532,241
`
`APR 29 2014
`
`NOTICE OF FINAL DETERMINATION
`
`A determination has been madethat U.S. Patent No. 5,532,241, which claims the human drug
`product VIIBRYD® (vilozodone hydrochloride), is eligible for patent term extension under35
`U.S.C. § 156. The period of extension has been determined to be 5 years.
`
`A single request for reconsideration ofthis final determination as to the length of extension of the
`term of the patent may be madeif filed within one month ofthe date of this notice. Extensions
`of time under 37 CFR § 1.136(a) are notapplicable to this time period. In the absence of such
`request for reconsideration, the Directorwill issue a certificate of extension, underseal, for a
`period of 5 years.
`:
`
`The period of extension, if calculated using the Food and Drug Administration determination of
`the length of the regulatory review period published in the Federal Register of April 6, 2012, (77
`Fed. Reg. 20830), would be 2,542 days. Under 35 U.S.C. § 156(c):
`
`Period of Extension
`
`RRP - PGRRP - DD - % (TP - PGTP)!
`4,778 -0-0- '% (4472 - 0)
`2,542 (7.0 years)
`
`Since the regulatory review period began December 24, 1997, after the patent issued (July 2,
`1996), the entire regulatory review period has been considered in the above determination ofthe
`length of the extension period 35 U.S.C. § 156(c). No determination ofa lack of due diligence
`under 35 U.S.C. § 156(c)(1) was made.
`
`The five year limitation of 35 U.S.C. § 156(g)(6)(A) applies in the present situation becausethe.
`patent wasissued after the date of enactment of 35 U.S.C. § 156. Since the period of extension
`calculated under 35 U.S.C. § 156(c) for the patent cannot exceed five years under 35 U.S.C.§ °
`156(g)(6)(A), the period of extension will be for five years.
`
`' Consistent with 35 U.S.C. § 156(c), “RRP”is the total numberofdaysin the regulatory
`review period, “PGRRP”is the numberof days of the RRP which were on and before the date on
`whichthe patent issued, “DD”is the numberof days of the RRP that the applicant did not act
`with due diligence, “TP”is the testing phase period described in paragraphs (1)(B)(i), (2)(B)(i),
`(3)(B)(i), (4)(B)(@), and (5)(B)(i) of subsection (g) of 35 U.S.C. § 156, and “PGTP”is the number
`of days of the TP which were on and before the date on whichthe patent issued, wherein half
`days are ignored for purposesof the subtraction of 2 (TP - PGTP).
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`USS. Patent No. 5,532,241
`
`Page 2
`
`The 14 year limitation of 35 U.S.C. § 156(c)(3) does not operate to further reduce the period of
`extension determinedabove.
`
`Uponissuanceofthe certificate of extension, the following information will be published in the
`Official Gazette:
`
`U.S. Patent No.:
`
`Granted:
`
`5,532,241
`
`July 2, 1996
`
`Original Expiration Date’:
`
`September29, 2014
`
`Applicant:
`
`Henning Béttcheretal.
`
`Ownerof Record:
`
`Merck Patentgesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung
`
`Title:
`
`. Piperidines and Piperazines
`
`Product Trade Name:
`
`VIIBRYD®(vilozodone hydrochloride)
`
`Term Extended:
`
`5 years
`
`Expiration Date of Extension:.
`
`September29, 2019
`
`*Subject to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 41(b).
`
`Page 4
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 5,532,241
`
`Page 3
`
`Anycorrespondence from applicant with respect to this matter should be submitted via the
`USPTO’s EFS Websystem and should.be addressed as follows:
`
`By mail:
`
`Mail Stop Hatch-Waxman PTE
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`
`Telephone inquiries related to this determination should be directed to the undersigned at(571)
`272-7755.
`<
`
`Mary C. Till
`Senior Legal Advisor
`Office of Patent Legal Administration
`Office of the Deputy Commissioner
`for Patent Examination Policy
`
`cc:
`
`Office of Regulatory Policy
`Food and Drug Administration
`10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6284
`Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
`
`RE: VIIBRYD® (vilozodone
`hydrochloride)
`Docket No.: FDA-2011-E-0380
`
`Attention: Beverly Friedman
`
`Page 5
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`pee ETC Department of Health and Human Services
`‘,
`{
`
`Z
`heman,
`
`|
`
`Public Health Service
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`DEC 18 2012
`
`Re: VIIBRYD
`U.S. Patent Nos. 5,532,241 and 7,834,020
`Docket Nos. FDA-2011-E-0380
`FDA-2011-E-0389
`
`The Honorable David J. Kappos
`Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property
`Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Mail Stop Hatch-Waxman PTE
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Dear Director Kappos:
`
`This is in regard to the patent term extension applications for U.S. Patent Nos. 5,532,241 and
`7,834,020 filed by Merck Patent GmbH under 35 U.S.C. § 156. The patents clam VIIBRYD,
`which was assigned new drug application 22-567.
`
`In the April 6, 2012,issue of the Federal Register (77 Fed. Reg. 20830), the Food and Drug
`Administration published its determination ofthis product's regulatory review period, as required
`under 35 U.S.C. § 156(d)(2)(A). The notice provided that on or before October 3, 2012, 180
`daysafter the publication of the determination, any interested person couldfile a petition with
`FDAunder 35 U.S.C. § 156(d)(2)(B)(i) for a determination of whether the patent term extension
`applicant acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period.
`
`The 180-dayperiod for filing a due diligence petition pursuantto this notice has expired and
`FDAhas received no such petition. Therefore, FDA considers the regulatory review period
`determinationto befinal.
`
`Please let me know if we can provide further assistance.
`
`Sincerely yours,
`
`pon Olilud
`
`Jane A. Axelrad
`Associate Director for Policy
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`cc:
`
`Danielle L. Herritt
`McCarter & English LLP
`265 Franklin Street
`Boston, MA 02110
`
`Page 6
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`AgTENTICATED
`Ws Covenant
`BecRMaTon
`GPO,
`
`Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 67/Friday, April 6, 2012/ Notices
`20830
`
`DATSCAN andis publishing this notice
`of that determination as required by
`law. FDA has madethe determination
`because of the submission of an
`application to the Director of Patents
`and Trademarks, Departmentof
`Commerce, for the extension of a patent
`which claims that human drug product.
`ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
`commentsto http://
`www.regulations.gov. Submit written
`petitions along with three copies and
`written comments to the Division of
`Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food
`and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
`Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
`Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
`Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
`10903 New Hampshire Ave. Bldg. 51,
`rm, 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
`0002, (301) 796-3602.
`SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION: The Drug
`Price Competition and Patent Term
`Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417)
`and the Generic Animal Drug andPatent
`Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670)
`generally provide that a patent may be
`extendedfor a period of up to 5 years
`so long as the patented item (human
`drug product, animal drug product,
`medical device, food additive, or color
`additive) was subject to regulatory
`review by FDAbefore the item was
`marketed. Underthese acts, a product’s
`regulatory review period formsthe basis
`for determining the amountof extension
`an applicant mayreceive.
`A regulatory review period consists of
`two periods oftime: A testing phase and
`an approval phase. For human drug
`products, the testing phase begins when
`the exemption to permit theclinical
`investigations of the drug becomes
`effective and runs until the approval
`phase begins. The approval phasestarts
`with the initial submission of an
`application to market the human drug
`product and continues until FDA grants
`permission to market the drug product.
`Although only a portion of a regulatory
`review period may count toward the
`actual amountof extension that the
`Director of Patents and Trademarks may
`award (for example, half the testing
`phase must be subtracted as well as any
`time that may have occurred before the
`patent was issued), FDA’s determination
`of the length of a regulatory review
`period for a humandrug productwill
`includeall of the testing phase and
`approval phaseas specified in 35 U.S.C.
`156(g)(1)(B).
`FDArecently approved for marketing
`the human drug product DATSCAN
`(Ioflupane I-123 injection). DATSCAN
`is indicated for striatal dopamine
`transporter visualization using single
`
`photon emission computed tomography
`brain imagingto assist in the evaluation
`of adult patients with suspected
`Parkinsonian syndromes. Subsequentto
`this approval, the Patent and Trademark
`Office received a patent term restoration
`application for DATSCAN (U.S. Patent
`No. 5,310,912) from GE Healthcare
`Limited, and the Patent and Trademark
`Office requested FDA’s assistance in
`determiningthis patent’s eligibility for
`patent term restoration. In a letter dated
`June 22, 2011, FDA advised the Patent
`and Trademark Office that this human
`drug product had undergone a
`regulatory review period and that the
`approval of DATSCAN represented the
`first permitted commercial marketing or
`use of the product. Thereafter, the
`Patent and Trademark Office requested
`that FDA determine the product’s
`regulatory review period.
`FDA has determinedthat the
`applicable regulatory review periodfor
`DATSCANis 677 days, Of this time, 0
`days occurred duringthe testing phase
`of the regulatory review period, while
`677 days occurred during the approval
`phase. These periods of time were
`derived from the following dates:
`1. The date an exemption under
`section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
`and Cosmetic Act (the FFD&C Act) (21
`U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: not
`applicable. The applicant claims June
`19, 1997, as the date the investigational
`new drug application (IND) became
`effective. However, FDA records
`indicate that no IND was submitted
`under subsection 505(i) of the FFD&C
`Actfor this human drug product.
`2. The date the application was
`initially submitted with respect to the
`human drug product undersection
`505(b) of the FFD&C Act: March 9, 2009.
`The applicant claims March 6, 2009,as
`the date the new drugapplication
`(NDA) for DATSCAN (NDA 22-454) was
`initially submitted. However, FDA
`records indicate that NDA 22-454 was
`submitted on March 9, 2009.
`3. The date the application was
`approved:January 14, 2011. FDA has
`verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
`22-454 was approvedon January 14,
`2011.
`This determination of the regulatory
`review period establishes the maximum
`potential length of a patent extension.
`However, the U.S. Patent and
`Trademark Office applies several
`statutory limitations in its calculations
`of the actual period for patent extension.
`In its application for patent extension,
`this applicant seeks 5 years of patent
`term extension.
`Anyonewith knowledgethat any of
`the dates as published are incorrect may
`submit to the Division of Dockets
`
`_ Management(see ADDRESSES) either
`electronic or written comments and ask
`for a redetermination by June 5, 2012.
`Furthermore, any interested person may
`petition FDA for a determination
`regarding whetherthe applicant for
`extension acted with due diligence
`during the regulatory review period by
`October 3, 2012. To meetits burden, the
`petition must contain sufficient facts to
`merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
`Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
`pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
`the formatspecified in 21 CFR 10.30.
`Interested persons may submit to the
`Division of Dockets Management(see
`ADDRESSES)electronic or written
`comments and written petitions. It is
`only necessary to send oneset of
`comments. However,if you submit a
`written petition, you must submit three
`copiesofthe petition. Identify
`comments with the docket number
`found in brackets in the heading ofthis
`document.
`Comments andpetitions that have not
`been madepublicly available on
`regulations.gov may be viewedin the
`Division of Dockets Management
`between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
`through Friday.
`Dated: March 19, 2012.
`Jane A. Axelrad,
`Associate Directorfor Policy, Centerfor Drug
`Evaluation and Research.
`{FR Doc. 2012-8340 Filed 4-5—12; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
`
`DEPARTMENT.OF HEALTH AND
`HUMAN SERVICES
`
`Food and Orug Administration
`
`(Docket Nos. FDA-2011-E-0380 and FDA-
`2011—E-0389)
`
`Determination of Regulatory Review
`Period for Purposes of Patent
`Extension; VIIBRYD
`
`AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,
`HHS.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: TheFood and Drug
`Administration (FDA) has determined
`the regulatory review period for
`VIIBRYD andis publishing this notice
`of that determination as required by
`law. FDA has madethe determination
`becauseof the submission of
`applications to the Director of Patents
`and Trademarks, Department of
`Commerce, for the extension of patents
`which claim that human drug product.
`ADORESSES:Submit electronic
`commentsto http://
`www.regulations.gov. Submit written
`
`Page 7
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`20831
`Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 67/Friday, April 6, 2012/ Notices
`
`
`petitions along with three copies and
`written comments to the Division of
`Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food
`and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
`Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
`Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
`Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
`10903 New Hampshire Ave. Bldg. 51,
`rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
`0002, 301-796-3602.
`SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION: The Drug
`Price Competition and Patent Term
`Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417)
`and the Generic Animal Drug andPatent
`Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670)
`generally provide that a patent may be
`extended for a period of up to 5 years
`so long as the patented item (human
`drug product, animal drug product,
`medical device, food additive, or color
`additive) was subject to regulatory
`review by FDA before the item was
`marketed. Underthese acts, a product’s
`regulatory review period formsthe basis
`for determining the amountof extension
`an applicant mayreceive.
`A regulatory review period consists of
`two periodsoftime: A testing phase and
`an approval phase. For human drug
`products, the testing phase begins when
`the exemption to permit the clinical
`investigations of the drug becomes
`effective and runs until the approval
`phase begins. The approval phasestarts
`with the initial submission of an
`application to market the human drug
`product and continues until FDA grants
`permission to market the drug product.
`Althoughonly a portion of a regulatory
`review period may count toward the
`actual amountof extension that the
`Director of Patents and Trademarks may
`award (for example, half the testing
`phase mustbe subtracted as well as any
`time that may have occurred before the
`patent was issued), FDA’s determination
`of the length of a regulatory review
`period for a human drug product will
`includeall of the testing phase and
`approvalphaseas specified in 35 U.S.C.
`156(g)(1)(B).
`FDA recently approved for marketing
`the human drug product VIIBRYD
`(vilazodone hydrochloride}. VIHBRYDis
`indicated for the treatment of major
`depressive disorder. Subsequentto this
`approval, the Patent and Trademark
`Office received a patent term restoration
`application for VIIBRYD(U.S. Patent
`Nos. 5,532,241 and 7,834,020) from
`Merck Patent GmbH, and the Patent and
`Trademark Office requested FDA’s
`assistance in determiningthis patent’s
`eligibility for patent term restoration. In
`a letter dated June 22, 2011, FDA
`advised the Patent and Trademark
`Office that this human drug product had
`
`undergonea regulatory review period
`and that the approval of VIIBRYD
`representedthefirst permitted
`commercial marketing or use of the
`product. Thereafter, the Patent and
`Trademark Office requested that FDA
`determine the product’s regulatory
`review period.
`FDAhas determinedthat the
`applicable regulatory review period for
`VIIBRYD is 4,778 days. Of this time,
`4,472 days occurred duringthe testing
`phaseof the regulatory review period,
`while 306 days occurred during the
`approval phase. Theseperiodsof time
`were derived from the following dates:
`1. The date an exemption under
`section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
`and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
`U.S.C. 355(i)) becameeffective:
`December 24, 1997. FDA hasverified
`the applicant’s claim that the date the
`investigational new drug application
`becameeffective was on December24,
`1997.
`2. The date the application was
`initially submitted with respect to the
`human drug product undersection
`505(b) of the FD&C Act: March 22, 2010.
`FDAhas verified the applicant’s claim
`that the new drug application (NDA)for
`VIIBRYD (NDA 22-567) was submitted
`on March 22, 2010.
`3. The date the application was
`approved:January 21, 2011. FDA has
`verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
`22-567 was approvedon January 21,
`2011.
`This determination of the regulatory
`review period establishes the maximum
`potential length of a patent extension.
`However,the U.S. Patent and
`TrademarkOffice applies several
`statutory limitations in its calculations
`of the actual period for patent extension.
`In its applications for patent extension,
`this applicant seeks either 67 days or 5
`years of patent term extension.
`Anyone with knowledgethat any of
`the dates as published are incorrect may
`submit to the Division of Dockets
`Management(see ADORESSES)either
`electronic or written comments and ask
`for a redetermination by June 5, 2012.
`Furthermore, any interested person may
`petition FDA for a determination
`regarding whetherthe applicant for
`extension acted with duediligence
`during the regulatory review period by
`October 3, 2012. To meetits burden, the
`petition must contain sufficient facts to
`merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
`Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
`pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
`the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
`Interested persons may submitto the
`Division of Dockets Management(see
`ADDRESSES)electronic or written
`comments and written petitions. It is
`
`only necessary to send oneset of
`comments. However, if you submit a
`written petition, you must submit three
`copies of the petition. Identify
`comments with the docket number
`found in brackets in the headingofthis
`document.
`Comments andpetitions that have not
`been made publicly available on
`regulations.gov may be viewedin the
`Division of Dockets Management
`between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
`through Friday.
`Dated: March 19, 2012.
`Jane A. Axelrad,
`Associate Directorfor Policy, Centerfor Drug
`Evaluation and Research.
`[FR Doc. 2012-8341 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
`HUMAN SERVICES
`
`National Institutes of Health
`
`National CancerInstitute; Notice of
`Closed Meeting
`
`Pursuantto section 10(d) of the
`Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
`amended(5 U.S.C. App.), noticeis
`hereby given of the following meeting.
`The meeting will be closed
`to the
`public in accordance with the
`provisionsset forth in sections
`552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
`as amended. Thegrant applications and
`the discussions could disclose
`confidential trade secrets or commercial
`property such as patentable material,
`and personal information concerning
`individuals associated with the grant
`applications, the disclosure of which
`would constitute a clearly unwarranted
`invasion of personalprivacy.
`Nameof Committee: National Cancer
`Institute Initial Review Group; Subcommittee
`A—Cancer Centers.
`Date: May 3, 2012
`Time: 8 a.m. to 5:20 p.m.
`Agenda: Toreview andevaluate grant
`applications.
`Place: Courtyard by Marriott, 5520
`Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
`Contact Person: Gail J Bryant, MD, Medical
`Officer, Resources and Training Review
`Branch, Division of Extramural Activities,
`National CancerInstitute, 6116 Executive
`Blvd., Room 8107, MSC 8328, Bethesda, MD
`20892-8328, (301) 402-0801, gb30t@nih.gov.
`Informationis also available on the
`Institute’s/Center’s home page: http://
`deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/irg/irg.htm,
`where an agenda andanyadditional
`information for the meeting will be posted
`whenavailable.
`
`(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
`Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction;
`93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention
`Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and
`
`Page 8
`
`Page 8
`
`

`

`ERVICE,
`
`3°
`S
`
`S.
`
`b
`‘Sy
`
`al
`
`onHEALTHgSs%2)
`
`DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH &HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville MD 20857
`
`Re: VIIBRYD
`Patent Nos. 5,532,241 and 7,834,020
`Docket Nos. FDA-2011-E-0380 and
`FDA-2011-E-0389
`
`APR
`
`3 2012
`
`The Honorable David J. Kappos
`Undersecretary of Commercefor Intellectual Property
`Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Mail Stop Hatch-Waxman PTE
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Dear Director Kapnos:
`
`This is in regard to the applications for patent term extension for U.S. Patent Nos. 5,532,241 and
`7,834,020, filed by Merck Patent GmbH,under 35 U.S.C.section 156 et seg. We have reviewed
`the dates contained in the applications and have determined the regulatory review periodfor
`VIIBRYD (vilazodone hydrochloride), the human drug product claimed bythe patents.
`
`length of the regulattory reviewperiod for VIIBRYD (vilazodone hydrochloride) is
`&
`The total
`4,778 days. Ofthis time, 4,472 days occurred during the testing phase and 306 days occurred
`during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the following dates:
`
`I.
`
`2.
`
`The date an exemption under subsection 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
`Act involving this drug product becameeffective: December 24, 1997.
`
`FDA hasverified the applicant's claim that the date the investigational new drug
`application becameeffective was on December 24, 1997
`
`The date the application wasinitially submitted with respect to the human drug product
`under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: March 22, 2010.
`
`FDAhasverified the applicant's claim that the new drug application (NDA) for
`VIIBRYD (NDA22-567) was submitted on March 22, 2010.
`
`3.
`
`The date the application was approved: January 21, 2011.
`
`FDAhasverified the applicant's claim that NDA 22-567 was approved on January 21,
`2011.
`
`This determination of the regulatory review period by FDA doesnottake into account the
`effective date of the patent, nor doesit exclude one-half of the testing phase as required by 35
`U.S.C. section 156(c)(2).
`
`Page 9
`
`Page 9
`
`€
`

`

`Kappos - VIIBRYD
`Patent No. 5,532,241 and 7,834,020
`Page 2
`
`Please let me know if we can be of further assistance.
`
`Sincerely yours,
`
`0djlibu/)
`
`Jane A. Axelrad
`Associate Director for Policy
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`cc:
`
`Danielle L. Herritt
`McCarter & English LLP
`265 Franklin Street
`Boston, MA 02110
`
`Page 10
`
`Page 10
`
`

`

`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`NOV 29 20)]
`
`Office of Regulatory Policy
`.
`Food and Drug Administration
`10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6222
`Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
`
`Attention: Beverly Friedman
`
`Dear Ms. Axelrad:
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`Transmitted herewith is a copy of the application for patent term extension of U.S. Patent No.
`5,532,241. The application was filed on March 17, 2011, under 35 U.S.C. § 156. Please.note
`that a patent term extension application for U.S. Patent No. 7,834,020 for NDA 22-567for the
`human drug product VITIBRYD®(vilozodone hydrochloride) was filed concurrently, pursuant to
`the provisions of 37 C.F.R. § 1.785.
`
`The patent claims a product that was subject to regulatory review under the Federal Food, Drug
`and Cosmetic Act. Subject to final review, the subject patent is consideredto be eligible for
`patent term extension. Thus, a determination by your office of the applicable regulatory review
`period is necessary. Accordingly, notice and a copy ofthe application are provided pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 156(d)(2)(A).
`
`Inquiries regarding this communication should be directed to the undersigned at (571) 272-7755
`(telephone) or (571) 273-7755 (facsimile).
`
`Mary C. Till
`Senior Legal Advisor
`Office of Patent Legal Administration
`Office of the Associate Commissioner
`for Patent Examination Policy
`
`cc:
`
`Danielle L. Herritt
`McCarter & English LLP
`265 Franklin Street
`Boston, MA 02110
`
`RE: VIIBRYD® (vilozodone hydrochloride)
`Docket No. FDA-2011-E-389
`
`Pa
`
`ge 11
`
`Page 11
`
`

`

`ERVIC,
`a SERICES-¢
`
`HEALTH4a%=
`gt
`
`.
`
`=%
`
`DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH &HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`JUN 22 201
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville MD 20857
`
`Re: VIIBRYD
`Patent Nos. 5,532,241 and 7,834,020
`Docket Nos. FDA-2011-E-0389
`FDA-2011-E-0380
`
`The Honorable David J. Kappos
`Under Secretary of CommerceforIntellectual Property
`Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Mail Stop Hatch-Waxman PTE
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Dear Director Kappos:
`
`This is in regardto the applications for patent term extension for U.S. Patent Nos.
`5,532,241 and 7,834,020filed by Merck Patent GmbH, under 35 U.S.C. § 156. The
`human drug product claimed by the patents is VIIBRYD (vilazodone hydrochloride),
`which wasassigned new drug application (NDA) No. 22-567.
`
`A reviewof the Food and Drug Administration's official records indicates that this
`product was subject to a regulatory review period before its commercial marketing or use,
`as required under 35 U.S.C. § 156(a)(4). Our records also indicate that it represents the
`first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product, as defined under 35 U.S.C. §
`156(f)(1).
`
`The NDA wasapproved on January 21, 2011, which makes the submissionofthe patent
`term extension applications on March 17, 2011, timely within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. §
`156(d)(1).
`
`Should you conclude that the subject patent is eligible for patent term extension, please
`advise us accotdingly. As required by 35 U.S.C. § 156(d)(2)(A) we will then determine
`the applicable regulatory review period, publish the determination in the Federal
`Register, and notify you of our determination.
`
`Please let me know if we can be offurther assistance.
`
`Sincerely yours,
`
`JaneA.Axelrad YlixA
`
`Associate Director for Policy
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`Page 12
`
`Page 12
`
`€
`

`

`Kappos- Viibryd
`Patent Nos. 5,532,241 and 7,834,020
`Page 2
`
`~N
`cc:
`
`.
`.
`Danielle L. Herritt
`McCarter & English LLP
`265 Franklin Street
`Boston, MA 02110
`
`Page 13
`
`Page 13
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFIGE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box
`450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`
`
`
`FILING OR 371(C) DATE
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER
`
`FIRST NAMED APPLICANT
`
`ATTY. DOCKET NO./TITLE
`
`08/314,734
`
`09/29/1994
`
`HENNING BOTTCHER
`
`MERCK1617
`CONFIRMATION NO. 3429
`
`MILLEN WHITE ZELANO AND BRANIGAN
`ARLINGTON COURTHOUSE PLAZA | SUITE 1400
`
`2200 CLARENDON BOULEVARD
`ARLINGTON, VA 22201
`
`POWER OF ATTORNEYNOTICE
`
`IOC
`0000004692566/
`Date Mailed: 04/27/2011
`
`NOTICE REGARDING CHANGE OF POWEROF ATTORNEY
`
`This is in response to the Power of Attorneyfiled 04/03/2011.
`
`* The Power of Attorney to you in this application has been revoked by the assignee who hasintervened as
`provided by 37 CFR 3.71. Future correspondencewill be mailed to the new address of record(37 CFR 1.33).
`
`/dolipscomb/
`
`
`
`Office of Data Management, Application Assistance Unit (571) 272-4000, or (571) 272-4200, or 1-888-786-0101
`
`page 1 of 1
`
`Page 14
`
`Page 14
`
`

`

`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER
`
`
`
`FILING OR 371(C) DATE
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFIGE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`FIRST NAMED APPLICANT
`
`ATTY. DOCKET NO./TITLE
`
`08/3 14,734
`
`09/29/1994
`
`HENNING BOTTCHER
`
`120140-00201
`CONFIRMATIONNO. 3429
`
`86736
`VideoMining Corporation
`
`403 South Allen Street, Suite 101
`
`State College, PA 16801
`
`POA ACCEPTANCE LETTER
`
`MOC000000047391030
`
`Date Mailed: 04/27/2011
`
`NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF POWEROF ATTORNEY
`
`This is in response to the Power of Attorneyfiled 03/21/2011.
`
`The Power of Attorney in this application is accepted. Correspondencein this application will be mailed to the
`above address as provided by 37 CFR 1.33.
`
`/dtvernon/
`
`
`
`Office of Data Management, Application Assistance Unit (571) 272-4000, or (571) 272-4200, or 1-888-786-0101
`
`page 1 of 1
`
`Page 15
`
`Page 15
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFIGE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`
`
`
`FILING OR 371(C) DATE
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER
`
`FIRST NAMED APPLICANT
`
`ATTY. DOCKET NO./TITLE
`
`08/3 14,734
`
`09/29/1994
`
`HENNING BOTTCHER
`
`120140-00201
`CONFIRMATION NO. 3429
`
`86738
`MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP BOSTON
`
`265 Franklin Street
`
`Boston, MA 02110
`
`POA ACCEPTANCE LETTER
`
`INOUEA000000047391125
`
`Date Mailed: 04/27/2011
`
`NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF POWEROF ATTORNEY
`
`This is in response to the Power of Attorneyfiled 03/21/2011.
`
`The Power of Attorney in this application is accepted. Correspondencein this application will be mailed to the
`above address as provided by 37 CFR 1.33.
`
`/dtvernon/
`
`
`
`Office of Data Management, Application Assistance Unit (571) 272-4000, or (571) 272-4200, or 1-888-786-0101
`
`page 1 of 1
`
`Page 16
`
`Page 16
`
`

`

`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`APR 18 2011
`
`Office of Regulatory Policy
`Food and Drug Administration
`10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6222
`Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
`
`Attention: Beverly Friedman
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`The attached application for patent term extension ofU.S.Patent No. 5,532,241 was filed on
`March 17, 2011, under

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket