throbber
Water Migration from Soft Gelatin Capsule Shell to Fill
`Material and Its Effect on Drug Solubility
`
`ABU T. M. SERAJUDDIN~,PAI-CHANG SHEEN, AND MAITHEW A. AUGUSTINE
`
`Received Jul 15, 1985, from the Pharmacy RbD Depament, Revlon Health Care Research, Tuckahoe, NY 10707.
`October 8, lJ85.
`
`Accepted for publication
`
`Abstract 0 The bioavailability of some poorly water-soluble drugs was
`reported to increase due to a change in dosage form from a tablet to a
`solution encapsulated in soft gelatin capsules. However, the objective of
`increasing the bioavailability may be defeated if the drug crystallizes
`from a solution inside the capsule. In this study, a water-insoluble drug
`[a-pentyl-3-(2-quinolinylmethoxy)benzenemethanol; REV 59011 was
`solubilized in both polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400) and a 6:l mixture
`of Geluclre 44/14:PEG 400. The solutions were then encapsulated in
`soft elastic gelatin capsules with a fill weight of 700 mg (drug, 125 mg),
`and water migration from the capsule shell into the fill material and its
`effect on the solubility of the drug were investigated. Gelucire 44/14 is a
`mixture of hydrogenated fatty acid esters with a mp of 44°C; PEG 400
`was added to reduce the mp of solution to -36°C for easier encapsula-
`tion. After equilibration of capsules at ambient condition, the amount of
`water in the PEG 400 solution was 6.3%. This reduced the solubility of
`the drug by 45%, resulting in drug crystallization. The solubility de-
`creased exponentially with the increase in water content. The water in
`the encapsulated Ge1ucire:PEG solution was only 1 .l YO, which did not
`affect the solubility significantly.
`
`The advantages of drugs in soft gelatin capsules over
`conventional dosage forms, e.g., tablets, hard gelatin cap-
`sules, solutions, etc., have been reported in the literature.
`The advantages include increased bioavailability,la consum-
`er preference,' better stability,'" easier processibility,1.6 and
`reduced side effects.6 In recent years, there has been a
`renewed interest in soft gelatin capsules after it was shown
`that the bioavailability of digoxin, a poorly water-soluble and
`erratically bioavailable drug, could be increased significant-
`ly by a change in dosage form from a tablet to a soft gelatin
`
`c a p s ~ l e . ~ - ~ In most cases, the primary reason for increased
`bioavailability was that the drug was encapsulated in a
`solubilized form. Following oral intake of capsules, the drug
`dissolves or disperses rapidly in the GI fluid.
`The physicochemical characteristics of soft gelatin cap-
`sules are different from those of other conventional dosage
`forms, and, therefore, special considerations are necessary in
`formulating this dosage form.6J0 Properties of the drug and
`the vehicle, solubility of the drug, processibility of the
`vehicle, compatibility of the drug, the vehicle, and the
`gelatin shell, and stability of these three components after
`encapsulation must be carefully evaluated during formula-
`tion. However, little on the development of bioavailable soft
`gelatin capsule formulations has been reported in the litera-
`ture.
`Due to the high initial water content of the soft gelatin
`capsule shell (>20%),"3 water migrates from the shell to the
`fill material during the drying and subsequent equilibration
`periods.6J0 The objective of increasing the bioavailability of a
`drug by solubilization may be defeated if the drug crystal-
`lizes inside the capsule due to water migration. In this study,
`the effect of water migration on the solubility of a-pentyl-3-
`(2-quinolinylmethyoxy)benzenemethanol(1), a water-insolu-
`ble drug (solubility in water at 37°C -0.002 mg/mL),11 in
`water-miscible vehicles was investigated. Attempts were
`made to minimize water migration by the selection of a
`suitable vehicle. A method of formulating a semisolid solu-
`tion of 1 in a soft gelatin capsule is also described.
`
`Experimental Section
`Chemicals-Compound 1 was synthesized by the Process Chemis-
`try R&D Department of Revlon Health Care Research, Tuckahoe,
`N.Y.I2 Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400 was purchased from Ruger
`Chemical Co., Irvington, NJ. Gelucire 44/14 was supplied by Gatte-
`fosSe Corp., Hawthorne, NY. This proprietary material is a mixture
`of glyceryl and PEG 1500 esters of fatty acids; the fatty acids are
`produced by the hydrolysis of hydrogenated copra and palm kernel
`oils. It is amphiphilic in nature and, as indicated by the associated
`numbers, has a melting point of 44°C and an HLB value of 14.13
`Gelatin and plasticizers used for encapsulation were supplied by
`R. P. Scherer, Clearwater, FL.
`solubility of 1 in PEG 400 and
`Determination of Solubility-The
`in PEG 400-water mixtures were determined by equilibrating the
`drug with solvents at 20°C for -18 h. A wrist action shaker was used
`to equilibrate the solutions. The solutions were then centrifuged, and
`weighed amounts of supernatant liquids were analyzed spectropho-
`tometrically at 239 nm after suitable dilution with acidified metha-
`nol (1 M HCl:methanol, 1:9).
`In the case of Gelucire 44/14, which is a solid at room temperature,
`a direct determination of solubility was not possible. In this case,
`solutions with varying concentrations of 1 were prepared at 45°C.
`The solutions were then allowed to solidify at room temperature
`(-22°C) and the solid solutions were observed periodically for up to 3
`months under a polarized-light microscope for the presence of any
`drug crystal. The concentration at which a few crystals first ap-
`peared was estimated to be the drug solubility.
`Thermal AnalysisThermal analysis of Gelucire 44/14-based fill
`materials was conducted by using a Du Pont 990 thermal analyzer
`fitted with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). The samples
`tions were: sample size, 5 mg; temperature range, from -10°C to
`-80°C; heating rate, lO"C/min; and sensitivity, 0.5 mcal/s/in. (0.2
`mcal/efcm).
`Encapsulation of DrugSolutions of 1 (drug, 125 mg plus vehi-
`cle, 576 mg) were encapsulated in oblong soft gelatin capsules using
`an R. P. Scherer rotary die encapsulation machine. The process is
`essentially similar to that described earlier.1.6JO The solution of 1 in
`PEG 400 was encapsulated at room temperature. The solution in the
`Gelucire 44/14:PEG 400 mixture was filled at 38 f 1°C. Identical
`gelatin shell composition (gelatin, plasticizer and water) was used in
`all capsules. The capsules were equilibrated with 2 0 3 0 % relative
`humidity at room temperature for 7 d by placing them on open trays.
`They were then packaged in high density polyethylene bottles.
`Evaluation of Capsules-The water content of the capsule shell
`and the fill material was determined by Karl Fiecher analysis. To
`determine the water content of the capsule shell, the solution
`adhering to the inner surface of the shell waa scraped out. A
`stability-indicating HPLC method was used to determine the content
`uniformity of the capsules. The possible crystallization of 1 in the fill
`material was studied by using a polarized-light microscope.
`
`Results and Discussion
`Solubility in Polyethylene Glycol 400-Water System-
`The solubility of 1 in PEG 400 and PEG 400-water mixtures
`at 20°C are plotted in Fig. 1(A). Since the solubility of 1
`decreases with an increasing percentage of water, the
`amount of solvent per unit volume of solution differs. There-
`fore, the drug concentration was expressed with respect to a
`constant weight of solvent (milligrams of solute per grams of
`solvent); this is analogous to expressing the concentration in
`molality and has the advantage that a solution may be
`
`62 /Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
`Vol. 75, No. 1, January 1986
`
`OO22-3549/86/0 1 OO-0062$0 1 . OO/O
`8 1986, American Pharmaceutical Association
`
`0001
`
`PSG2010
`Catalent Pharma Solutions v. Patheon Softgels
`IPR2018-00421
`
`

`

`PEG 400 in the vehicle. The drug was dissolved by melting
`the vehicle at -45°C. The concentration of the drug ws
`adjusted such that 575 mg of vehicle contains 125 mg of 1
`(217 mg/g of vehicle). The thermal properties of drug solu-
`tions and vehicles were studied after equilibrating the sam-
`ples at room temperature for -24 h. The results are shown in
`Fig. 2. The DSC thermogram of the fill material of a soft
`gelatin capsule, determined 3 weeks after preparation, is also
`shown in this figure. Since the onsets of melting endotherms
`were not sharp, the melting peaks were compared. The
`samples melted completely within 2°C above the melting
`peak.
`Figure 2 shows that Gelucire 44/14 has its melting peak at
`42°C (thermogram A). This temperature remains unchanged
`when 1 is dissolved in Gelucire 44/14 (thermogram B). The
`melting peak of a 6:l mixture of Gelucire 44/14-PEG 400
`without drug is 41°C (thermogram C). However, when PEG
`400 is incorporated into the drug formulation, the peak
`melting temperature decreases progressively with the in-
`crease in PEG 400 concentration. The thermogram D shows
`that the peak melting temperature of a solution of 1 in a 6:l
`Gelucire 44/14-PEG 400 mixture is 36°C. The reason that 1
`decreased the melting temperature of a Gelucire 44/14-PEG
`400 mixture, but not of Gelucire 44/14 alone, is not clear from
`this study. It is possible that a eutectic mixture was formed
`in the presence of PEG 400. Based on this study, a tempera-
`ture of 38°C was selected for encapsulating the drug solution.
`As indicated by thermogram E, the thermal properties of the
`fill material do not change after encapsulation.
`Soft Gelatin Encapsulation and Effect of Water Migra-
`tion-The drug contents of the capsules containing PEG 400
`and a 6:l Gelucire 44/14-PEG 400 mixture as vehicles were
`found to be 121.9 +: 0.9 mg (SD, n = 10) and 128.0 4 0.6 mg
`(SD, n = lo), respectively, thus showing good content unifor-
`mity. The yields of capsules were 89.5 and 85.48, respective-
`ly, which is satisfactory for batch sizes of 10,000 capsules;
`most of the losses occurred during the initial setting of
`
`A
`
`0
`
`60
`40
`20
`TEMPERATURE, O C
`Figure 2-Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms of various
`formulations of fill material with and without drug. Key: (A) Gelucire
`44/74; (6) drug in Gelucire 44/14 (77.9% w/w); (C) &I mixture of
`Gelucire 44/14-PEG 400; (D) drug in 6: 1 mixture of Gelucire 444 4-
`PEG 400 (17.9% w/w); (E) fill material after encapsulation.
`
`80
`
`Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences / 63
`Vol. 75, No. 1, January 1986
`
`0
`
`30
`20
`10
`40
`Vo WATER IN THE SOLVENT, wlw
`Figure 1-(A) Solubility of a-penfyl-3-(2-quinolinylmetho~)benzene-
`methanol (1) in PEG 400-water cosolvent system at 20 "C. Data points
`at >50% water remain at the baseline. (6) Semilogarithmic plot of
`solubility of 1 in PEG 400-water cosolvent system at 20°C. At <20%
`water, data points at 5% intervals only are shown for the sake of clarify.
`
`50
`
`prepared by accurate weighing. The solubility of 1 in PEG
`400 at 20°C is 250 mg/g of solvent. The solubility decreases
`sharply with the incorporation of water in the system. For
`example, the solubility drops to -100 and -1.5 mg/g of
`solvent in the presence of 10 and 50% water, respectively. A
`semilogarithmic plot of the data in Fig. 1(B) shows a log-
`1inear14 decrease in solubility with the increase in percent-
`age of water in the solvent. Recently, Groves et al.16 also
`observed a similar log-linear decrease in solubility of a poorly
`water-soluble compound in PEG 400-water mixtures, except
`at a low percentage of water (<lo%). The deviation from the
`theoretical relationship at a low concentration of water was
`attributed to a possible chemical interaction between the
`compound and PEG 400. Although a high solubility of 1 in
`PEG 400 indicates a high solute-solvent affinity, no devi-
`ation from the theoretical relationship is observed.
`Solubility in Gelucire 44/14 and Gelucire 44/14-Polyeth-
`ylene Glycol 400 Mixture-The
`solubility of 1 in Gelucire
`44/14 at room temperature (-22'0, as determined by the
`microscopic method, was found to be 200 mg/g of vehicle; a
`progressively greater number of 1 crystals were observed
`with the increase in drug concentration above this level. No
`crystals of 1 were, however, observed at room temperature
`for at least 3 months when 217 mg of the drug was dissolved
`per gram of a 6: 1 mixture of Gelucire 44/14 and PEG 400. The
`latter concentration of drug was used in the fill material to
`maximize the amount of drug per capsule. Since the solubili-
`ties of 1 in Gelucire 44/14 and PEG 400 at 20-22°C were
`-200 and 250 mg/g, respectively, a concentration of 217 mglg
`of a 6:l mixture of Gelucire 44/14 and PEG 400 was consid-
`ered to be in the region of saturation solubility.
`Reduction of Melting Point of Gelucire 44/14-Gelucire
`44/14 has a melting point of 44°C (range: 4246°C). Since the
`turing is 37-4O0C:Jo 1 dissolved in a melt of Gelucire 44/14
`could not be encapsulated due to its high melting point
`relative to the sealing temperature. The melting point at the
`drug solution was, therefore, reduced by the incorporation of
`
`0002
`
`

`

`machines. Although the Gelucire 44114 based formulation
`was encapsulated at or near the temperature necessary to
`seal the gelatin shells, there was no significant loss of
`capsules due to defective sealing.
`The water content of fill materials and capsule shells was
`analyzed 3-4 weeks after preparing the capsules. When a
`solution of 1 in PEG 400 was used, the amount of water in the
`fill material was 6.4 2 0.1% of the initial fill weight. In
`contrast, the water content of the fill material where Gelu-
`cire 44114-PEG 400 was used to dissolve the drug was 1.1 2
`0% of the fill weight. The water contents of the capsule shells
`were 9.6 t 0.2 and 5.6 t 0.1%, respectively.
`The initial microscopic analysis of the contents of soft
`gelatin capsules for the presence of 1 crystals was made 3-4
`weeks after the preparation of the capsules. The capsules,
`after initial equilibration at 20-30% relative humidity for 1
`week, were stored at 22”C, protected from moisture. Gross
`crystallization of 1 was observed in soft gelatin capsules
`containing only PEG 400 as a vehicle. Initial concentration of
`the 1 solution inside the capsule was 17.9% wlw, which is
`below its saturation limit in PEG 400 (20% wlw at 20°C). The
`observed crystallization was, therefore, due to a lowering of
`solubility by the migration of water to the fill material. Only
`-80 mg of 1 remained in solution inside the capsule, which is
`in general agreement with Fig. 1. For comparison, a 17.9%
`wlw solution of 1 in PEG 400 was filled manually in hard
`gelatin capsules or glass vials, and stored under identical
`environmental conditions. No crystallization of drug was
`observed during 3 months of observation. Since, unlike a
`solution in PEG 400, the migration of water into the drug
`solution in Gelucire 44/14-PEG 400 was minimal, no crystal-
`lization of 1 was observed in this fill material for 3 months.
`The gelatin mass used to prepare soft gelatin capsule shells
`may contain 30-40% water.’ During drying and subsequent
`equilibration of capsules, the water may partially migrate
`into the fill material. The extent of such a migration of water
`may depend on the nature of the solvent or matrix used in the
`fill material. The lower water content of the fill material
`containing a mixture of Gelucire 44/14-PEG 400 as com-
`pared to PEG 400 alone may be related to the lower hydro-
`philicity of Gelucire 44/14 compared to that of PEG 400
`(HLB: 14 versus -20) and the low diffusion coefficient of
`water in the semisolid matrix.
`The water contents determined in the present study are
`essentially the equilibrium values. There was no significant
`change in the amount and shell-to-fill ratio of water in
`Gelucire 44/14 based capsules when stored in closed 45-mL
`high-density polyethylene bottles (20 capsuleshottle) under
`varying conditions (@C, 25”C, and 35°C) for an additional 3
`months. Due to gross crystallization of the drug, the stability
`of PEG 400 based capsules was not studied for an extended
`period of time.
`
`Another major difference between PEG 400 and Gelucire
`44/14-PEG 400 was in the particle sizes of drugs crystalliz-
`ing out of these vehicles. The majority of crystals in the PEG
`400 based formulation were 500-1000 pm. On the other
`hand, all crystals observed in the formulation containing the
`Gelucire 44114-PEG 400 mixture by reducing its tempera-
`ture to -4°C or by increasing the initial concentration of
`drug were <15 pm. This is possibly due to a difference in
`crystal growth in liquid and semisolid vehicles.
`One major limitation of soft gelatin capsules is the amount
`of drug that may be encapsulated as a solution. This is of
`particular concern if a high dose of drug is necessary.
`Sometimes the required amount of drug may not be solubi-
`lized in the best suitable solvent. The results of the present
`investigation show that this situation might be further
`complicated by a lowering of solubility due to water migra-
`tion. The migration of water, and thus the crystallization of
`1, can be minimized by changing, among other possible
`factors, the vehicle.
`In conclusion, the results of the present investigation
`highlight the importance of a critical evaluation of shell-to-
`fill water migration in formulating soR gelatin capsules.
`
`References and Notes
`1. Seager, H. Pharm. Tech. 1985,9(9), 84-104.
`2. Batemann, N.; Uccellini, D. A. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1984,36,
`461-464.
`3. Berry, I. R. Drug Cosm. Znd. 1983,133,32.
`4. Delane , R. Pharm. Exec. 1982,2, 3438.
`5. Ebert, 64. R. Pharm. Tech. 1977,1(5), 44-50.
`6. Caldwell, L.; Cargill, R.; Ebert, W. R.; Windheuser, J. J. Pharm.
`Tech. 1979,3(7), 52-56.
`7. Mallis, G. I.; Schmidt, D. H.; Lindenbaum, J. Clin. Pharmacol.
`Ther. 1975,18, 761-768.
`8. Marcus, F. E.; Dickerson, J.; Pippin, S.; Stafford, M.; Bressler, R.
`Clin. Pharmcol. Ther. 1976,20, 253-259.
`9. Johnson, B. F.; Bye, C.; Jones, G.; Sabey, G. A. Clin. Pharmacol.
`Ther. 1976,19,746-751.
`10. Stanley, J. P. in “The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharma-
`7” ebiger: Philadel hia, 1976; p 404-420.
`; Lachman, L.; Lieberman, H. A.; Kanig, J. L., Eds.; Lea &
`11. Serajuddin, A. T.R.; Sheen, F. C:; Bernstein, D. F.; Mufson, D.;
`Augustine, M. A. J. Pharm. Sci. in press.
`12. Compound 1 is also known as REV 5901.
`13. Wagmaire, L.; Glas, B. “Gelucire”, technical literature, No. 74,
`Gattefossb Co.: 1981; pp 3-8.
`14. Yalkowsky, S. H.; Flynn, G. L.; Amidon, G. L. J . Phurm. Sci.
`1972,61, 983-984.
`15. Groves, M. J.; Bassett, B.; Sheth, V. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1984,
`36.799-802.
`
`Acknowledgments
`“he authors thank R. P. Scherer North America, Clearwater, FL,
`for the use of its facilities in encapsulating soft gelatin capsules. The
`assistance of Ms. E. Eger in the preparation of this manuscript is
`gratefully acknowledged.
`
`64 / Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
`Vol. 75, No. 1, January 1986
`
`0003
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket