throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 42
`Entered: May 15, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NICHIA CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00386
`Patent No. 9,490,411 B2
`
`Case IPR2018-00437
`Patent No. 9,537,071 B2
`______________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, WILLIAM V. SAINDON, and
`NATHAN A. ENGELS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ENGELS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VIZIO, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`Dismissing Joint Motion to Terminate Without Prejudice
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00386 (Patent No. 9,490,411 B2)
`IPR2018-00437 (Patent No. 9,537,071 B2)
`
`
`Oral arguments in these proceedings took place on March 5, 2019,
`and the statutory deadlines for final written decisions are June 26, 2019 for
`IPR2018-00386 and July 16, 2019 for IPR2018-00437. With an e-mail
`dated March 29, 2019, the parties notified the Board that the parties “have
`entered into a Binding Term Sheet . . . and are preparing the final settlement
`agreement,” and the parties jointly requested authorization to file a motion to
`terminate the proceedings.
`On April 1, 2019, the Board authorized the parties to file a joint
`motion to terminate and instructed the parties to file a copy of the settlement
`agreement as an exhibit to the joint motion. On April 12, 2019, the parties
`filed a Joint Motion to Terminate the Proceeding Pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`§ 317 (Paper 391) and included a copy of the parties’ Binding Term Sheet
`(Exhibit 2029).
`The Joint Motion to Terminate provides that the parties “have entered
`into a Binding Term Sheet in which the parties have agreed to cooperate to
`seek dismissal of this proceeding.” Paper 39, 2. Among other things, the
`Binding Term Sheet provides that the parties desire to settle their disputes
`and avoid continued litigation. Ex. 2029, 1. The Binding Term Sheet also
`states that the parties will work in good faith to prepare a “final agreement”
`and that “[u]nless and until such a final agreement is executed, this Binding
`Term Sheet shall control.” Ex. 2029, 1–2.
`At the request of the Board, a telephone conference was held on May
`6, 2019 to discuss the status of the “final agreement” referenced in the
`
`
`1 Paper numbers and exhibit numbers in this Order refer to those filed in
`IPR2018-00386.
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00386 (Patent No. 9,490,411 B2)
`IPR2018-00437 (Patent No. 9,537,071 B2)
`
`Binding Term Sheet. During the telephone conference, the parties indicated
`that the parties’ district-court litigation has been dismissed with prejudice
`pursuant to the parties’ settlement, but the parties also indicated that the
`parties are in on-going negotiations for a final settlement agreement.
`In relevant part, 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) requires that “[a]ny agreement or
`understanding between the patent owner and a petitioner, including any
`collateral agreements referred to in such agreement or understanding, made
`in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of an inter partes
`review under this section shall be in writing and a true copy of such
`agreement or understanding shall be filed in the Office before the
`termination of the inter partes review as between the parties.” 35 U.S.C.
`§ 317(b) (emphasis added). As noted above, the Binding Term Sheet
`expressly reflects the parties’ intention to negotiate and execute a “final
`agreement” in connection with termination of these proceedings. As
`§ 317(b) requires that the parties file any agreement or understanding,
`including any collateral agreements, before termination of the inter parties
`review, we determine it is premature to terminate these proceedings while
`the parties continue to negotiate a final agreement. In other words, under the
`current circumstances, the requirements of § 317(b) are not satisfied,
`notwithstanding the possibility the Binding Term Sheet may ultimately be
`the only agreement or understanding made in connection with termination of
`these proceedings (e.g., if the parties are unable to execute a “final
`agreement”).
`Accordingly, we dismiss the parties’ Joint Motion to Terminate
`without prejudice, with leave to file another joint motion to terminate. Any
`such motion to terminate shall explain why termination is appropriate and
`3
`
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00386 (Patent No. 9,490,411 B2)
`IPR2018-00437 (Patent No. 9,537,071 B2)
`
`how the motion is in compliance with § 317(b). 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(c). We
`remind the parties that 37 CFR § 42.8 requires the parties to file updated
`mandatory notices within 21 days of a change of information listed in the
`parties’ mandatory notices (e.g., related matters).
`
`
`ORDER
`In view of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Terminate is dismissed
`without prejudice, with leave to refile;
`ORDERED that, if the parties file a joint motion to terminate, the
`parties shall certify (i) that all agreements or understandings, including any
`collateral agreements, including but not limited to licenses, covenants not to
`sue, confidentiality agreements, payment arrangements, or other agreements
`of any kind, between the parties that are made in connection with
`termination of this proceeding have been filed and (ii) that no other written
`or oral agreements or understandings, including any collateral agreements,
`are made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of these
`proceedings;
`ORDERED that, if the parties do not file a joint motion to terminate
`before June 3, 2019, the parties must arrange a conference call with the
`Board to discuss the status of this proceeding; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall (either individually or
`jointly) file updated mandatory notices under 37 CFR §42.8 within five days
`of the date of this Order.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00386 (Patent No. 9,490,411 B2)
`IPR2018-00437 (Patent No. 9,537,071 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`Gabrielle E. Higgins
`Kathryn N. Hong
`ROPES & GRAY LLP,
`gabrielle.higgins@ropesgray.com
`kathryn.hong@ropesgray.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Martin M. Zoltick
`Michael H. Jones
`Mark T. Rawls
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
`mzoltick@rfem.com
`mjones@rfem.com
`mrawls@rfem.com
`
`5
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket