throbber
Filed on behalf of: Nichia Corporation Paper ____
`
`
`
`
`By: Martin M. Zoltick, Lead Counsel
`
`Robert P. Parker, Back-up Counsel
`Derek F. Dahlgren, Back-up Counsel
`Michael H. Jones, Back-up Counsel
`
`Mark T. Rawls, Back-up Counsel
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
`607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: 202-783-6040
`Facsimile: 202-783-6031
`Emails: mzoltick@rfem.com
`
` rparker@rfem.com
`
` ddahlgren@rfem.com
`
` mjones@rfem.com
`
` mrawls@rfem.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Date filed: January 29, 2019
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`VIZIO, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NICHIA CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2018-00386
`Patent 9,490,411
`_______________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00386
`Patent 9,490,411
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, dated June 26, 2018 (Paper 16), Patent
`
`Owner Nichia Corporation (“Patent Owner”) respectfully requests oral argument,
`
`which is scheduled to be held on March 5, 2019.
`
`Patent Owner Nichia requests a combined oral hearing for IPR2018-00386
`
`and IPR2017-00437 proceedings with an allocation of 75 minutes per side for the
`
`combined hearing. The oral argument in both IPRs is scheduled for March 5,
`
`2019, and involves the same parties, patents of the same family, and overlapping
`
`issues. Both trials are in front of the same panel of Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Patent Owner identifies the following
`
`issues as among those to be addressed at the oral argument:
`
`(1) Whether the term “region below an upper surface of the metal part”
`
`should be given its plain and ordinary meaning, such that the upper
`
`surface of the metal part provides a boundary to the claimed region that
`
`is below it.
`
`(2) Whether the term “a resin package comprising a resin part and a metal
`
`part” is properly construed as referring to a resin package, a resin part,
`
`and a metal part (leads) of “a singulated light emitting device;”
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`(3) Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving that the Challenged
`
`Claims are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Loh under any of
`
`Case IPR2018-00386
`Patent 9,490,411
`
`the grounds advanced in the Petition;
`
`(4) Any issues raised by Petitioner in its request for oral argument;
`
`(5) Any procedural or evidentiary issues raised by the parties; 1
`
`(6) Rebuttal to Petitioner’s presentation on all matters; and
`
`(7) Any other issues or arguments raised in the Papers, in any cited
`
`Exhibits, or otherwise raised by the Patent Owner, Petitioner, or the
`
`Board.
`
`Patent Owner requests the ability to use audio/visual equipment to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits and evidence of record, including the use of a projector and
`
`screen for a PowerPoint presentation, an overhead projector (“Elmo”), and other
`
`visual display.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Patent Owner submits that a pre-hearing conference would be appropriate to
`
`preview (but not argue) the issues to be discussed at the oral hearing, and to seek
`
`the Board’s guidance as to particular issues that the panel would like addressed by
`
`the parties. See Trial Practice Guide Update (August 2018), pp. 19-20.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00386
`Patent 9,490,411
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By:
`
`Date: January 29, 2019
`
` / Martin M. Zoltick /
`Martin M. Zoltick, Reg. No. 35,745
`
`
`
`
`
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST &
`
`
`
`
`
`
` MANBECK, P.C.
`607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: 202-783-6040
`Facsimile: 202-783-6031
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Nichia Corp.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00386
`Patent 9,490,411
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 29th day of January, 2019, a true and correct
`
`copy of the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`ARGUMENT was served, via electronic mail, upon the following counsel of
`
`record for Petitioner Vizio, Inc.:
`
`Gabrielle E. Higgins
`James L. Davis, Jr.
`Christopher M. Bonny
`James F. Mack
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284
`Phone: 650-617-4000 | Facsimile: 650-566-4090
`Emails: Gabrielle.Higgins@ropesgray.com
`James.L.Davis@ropesgray.com
`Christopher.Bonny@ropesgray.com
`James.Mack@ropesgray.com
`VIZIO2NichiaIPRs@ropesgray.com
`
`Scott McKeown
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`2099 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006-6807
`Phone: 202-508-4740 | Facsimile: 617-235-9492
`Email: Scott.McKeown@ropesgray.com
`
`
`
`/ Erik van Leeuwen /
`Erik van Leeuwen
`Litigation Operations Coordinator
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket