throbber
Paper 9
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: March 28, 2018
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`JOE ANDREW SALAZAR,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00273
`Patent 5,802,467
`____________
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, MATTHEW J. McNEILL, and
`STACY B. MARGOLIES, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`McNEILL, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Dariush Keyhani
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00273
`Patent 5,802,467
`
`Joe Andrew Salazar (“Patent Owner”) filed a Motion for Pro Hac
`Vice Admission of Dariush Keyhani. Paper 8 (“Motion”). Patent Owner
`also filed a declaration from Mr. Keyhani in support of the Motion. Ex.
`2001 (“Declaration”). Patent Owner’s Motion indicates HTC Corporation
`and HTC America, Inc. (collectively, “Petitioner”) does not oppose the
`Motion. Paper 8, 1. Petitioner did not file an opposition.
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding
`upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel is a
`registered practitioner. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). If lead counsel is a registered
`practitioner, a non-registered practitioner may be permitted to appear pro
`hac vice “upon showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney
`and has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the
`proceeding.” Id.
`In this proceeding, lead counsel for Patent Owner is Jennifer
`Meredith, a registered practitioner. Paper 4, 2. In support of the Motion,
`Mr. Keyhani declares that he is a member of the New Jersey bar. Ex. 2001
`¶¶ 2, 6. Mr. Keyhani declares that he has never been suspended, disbarred,
`sanctioned or cited for contempt by any court or administrative body, and
`that he has never had an application for admission to practice denied by any
`court or administrative body. Id. ¶¶ 7‒9. Mr. Keyhani declares that he is an
`experienced litigation attorney who is familiar with the subject matter at
`issue in this proceeding based on his representation of Patent Owner in court
`proceedings involving the same technology. Id. ¶¶ 3‒4. Mr. Keyhani also
`declares that he is familiar with the issued claims in U.S. Patent No.
`5,802,467 as well as the prior art references and associated grounds of
`unpatentability involved in this proceeding. Id. ¶ 4. Mr. Keyhani further
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00273
`Patent 5,802,467
`
`declares that he has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials as set forth in 37
`C.F.R. Part 42, and agrees to be subject to the USPTO’s Rules of
`Professional Conduct as set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). Id. ¶¶ 10‒11.
`Having reviewed the Motion and the Declaration, we conclude that
`Mr. Keyhani has sufficient qualifications to represent Patent Owner in these
`proceedings and that Patent Owner has shown good cause for Mr. Keyhani’s
`pro hac vice admission. See Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC,
`Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7) (setting forth the
`requirements for pro hac vice admission). Mr. Keyhani will be permitted to
`appear pro hac vice in these proceedings as back-up counsel only. See
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`Patent Owner is reminded of its obligation under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8 to
`update its mandatory notices with back-up counsel information within 21
`days of a change of information.
`
`ORDER
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`of Dariush Keyhani Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) is granted, and Mr. Keyhani
`is authorized to represent Patent Owner only as back-up counsel in these
`proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in these proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Keyhani is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00273
`Patent 5,802,467
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Keyhani is subject to the USPTO’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO’s Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth at 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–11.901.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00273
`Patent 5,802,467
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`B. Todd Patterson
`Jerry R. Selinger
`PATTERSON+SHERIDAN, LLP
`tpatterson@pattersonsheridan.com
`jselinger@pattersonsheridan.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jennifer Meredith
`Sucheta Chitgopekar
`Dariush Keyhani
`MEREDITH & KEYHANI, PLLC
`jmeredith@meredithkeyhani.com
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket