throbber
Controlled
`
`REVISED
`July 1 999
`
`Release Soclety, Inc.
`
`An inlcmallonal society advancing the science and lcchnology
`of chcmlcal and biological dcllvcry syslcrm.
`
`PROCEEDINGS BOOK
`
` THE 26TH INTERNATTONAL SYMPOSIUM ON
`CONTROLLED RELEASE OF
`BIOACTIVE MATERIALS
`
` THE SECOND CONFERENCE ON
`CONSUMER AND
`DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS
`
` JuneZO-ZS, I999
`
`
`
`1 (
`*,
`M
`
`I G'IR
`
`I {(1 ‘I
`
`'L‘ (395'! .I( :)
`
`PROGRAM COCHAIRS
`VLADIMIR TOW. NnrthcaSIL-m University. USA
`FRANCESCO M. Venom. University (If Padnva. Italy
`
`June 20-23, 1999
`
`Proceed. 1111’] SH!
`£31. Conlrol. Re]. Bloacl.
`uly 1999)
`Mater. Jillian-in
`ISSN anB-DIFS
`mm. b . the
`Contrallud clause Society. Inc.
`
`303mm MARRlO'I'l‘ COPLEY PLACE, BOSTON, MA USA
`
`Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`EX2010
`
`0001
`
`Mylan Tech., Inc. v. Noven Pharma, Inc.
`IPR2018—00174
`
`

`

`
` #5123
` rm. mallnalmny n. pmtseled by eapmm I-w ITlla 17 u s. Cod-L]
`
`EFFECT OF SILICONE / ACRYLIC PSA BLENDS ON SKIN PERMEATION
`
`LMgmgfle'. D Kanios, S Rossi-Montero, D. Houze, V. Nguyen, K. Moncada
`lNoven Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Miami, Florida 33186
`
`Introduction
`Rate and extent of skin permeation from
`dmg-in-adhesive
`(DIA)
`transdennal
`drug
`delivery systems (TDDS) has traditionally
`been attributed solely to the barrier properties
`of the stratum mmeum, a fact that has shed a
`negative light on the perceived ability of these
`DIA products to reproducibly attain the target
`pharmacological doses. Modification of these
`stratum comeum banier properties has been
`sought by incorporation into these products of
`chemical enhancers such as fatty acids, esters,
`etc. . .alone or in combination with polyhydr'ic
`alcohols.
`Although
`effective
`in
`skin
`permeations
`enhancement,
`chemical
`modification has a significant down side
`potential
`stemming
`from the
`increasing
`imitation potential
`that accompanies higher
`concentrations of these. Additionally, in DIA
`systems,
`these chemical enhancers typically
`possess
`surfactant
`properties
`that
`detrimentally affect
`the pressure sensitive
`adhesive (psa) properties of these and thus the
`Wear properties of the finished product
`
`Dmg solubility modification via the blending
`of psa's has been shown to be as effective as
`chemical enhancement with the added benefit
`of having increased versatility in attainment
`of the required wear properties. PSA blends,
`and more specifically, blends of acrylic psa's
`with silicone psa's have been shown to afford
`the formulatcr the ability to manipulate the
`height of the initial delivery peak (burst
`effect), the lag time, and the length of time
`the product can sustain the pseudo-zero-order
`delivery of the permeant molecule.
`'I'hese
`Performance characteristics are achieved by
`maximizing thermodynamic driving force
`With the minimal drug content by
`
`manipulation of the silicone to acrylic psa
`ratio.
`
`Experimental Method
`Two different drugs were evaluated in order
`to demonstrate the effects of varying the
`silicone to acrylic psa ratio. The two drugs
`selected, selegiline and estradiol, were picked
`based on their differences. Selegiline base is a
`volatile liquid at room temperature whereas
`estradiol
`is a solid. Selegiline doses are
`targeted in the area of 5-10 mg/day whereas
`estradiol is targeted at 0.05010 myday both
`from a 10 cm2 patch area.
`
`The selegiline formulations were made at
`12% w/w drug while varying the acrylic psa
`content between 15 and 60% and the silicone
`psa between
`28
`and 63%. No further
`excipients were used.
`
`The estradiol formulations all contained 1.6%
`
`estradiol, 7.5% kollidon-30, 8% dipropylene
`glycol and 6% oleyl alcohol. The acrylic psa
`content was varied between 10 and 20% in
`conjunction with a silicone psa variation
`between 66.9 and 56.9% by weight in the
`finished product.
`
`The diffusion rate of the drug is determined
`through a disc of cadaver skin. Epidermal
`discs from the same donor and site were used
`
`inter-subject
`in the study to factor out
`The receiving
`variability in permeability.
`solution is an isotonic saline solution with a
`sodium azide preservative (0.9% NaCl and
`0.01% NaNg) with a pH of 6.7. The cell
`is
`kept at a constant temperature of 32 °C and
`stirred continuously at ~300 rpm.
`The
`number of replicate cells per formulation in
`
`Proceed. Int'l. Symp. Control. Rel. Bloom. Match. 26 (fievlsed July 1999) Control“ "'1'“. 300M» Inc.
`
`0002
`
`

`

`the experiment was four. A known volume of
`saline was removed from the cell at specified
`time points. The complete contents of the
`receiver was removed and replaced with fresh
`saline to guard against solution saturation.
`The concentration of each sample of saline is
`determined through High Precision Liquid
`Chromatography with a detection wavelength
`of 220 nm.
`
`Results and Discussion
`SELEGILINE
`
`Figure #1 shows the effect of increased ratio
`of silicone to acrylic psa while holding the
`drug concentration constant at 12% drug. As
`can be seen in this plot, as the ratio of silicone
`to acrylic psa went from 28:60 to 58:30 to
`73:15,
`the
`corresponding
`average
`skin
`permeation rate went from 13.5 to 18.4 to
`29.7 ,ug/cmz with no significant change in the
`shape of the permeation curve (i.e.
`initial
`peak followed by a gradual fall off to the 26
`hour timepoint). Based on this performance,
`attaining equivalent rate and extent between
`the three formulations from a bioequivalence
`viewpoint could be achieved by varying the
`patch size.
`
`\ all
`l Inn.-
`“am I uns-
`..o-L'n I'ii
`III
`
`
`
`II
`
`II
`
`II
`
`0‘
`
`II
`
`mt-mdmumuMnmm
`
`ESYRADIOL
`Figure #2 illustrates the in-vitro performance
`of
`the
`estradiol
`formulations where
`the
`silicone to acrylic psa ratio was varied at a
`
`#5123
`
`constant concentration of estradiol (1.6% by
`weight). As shown, varying the silicone to
`acrylic psa ratio from 56.9220 to 61.9215 to
`66.9210 resulted in an average flux rate
`increase from 1.01 to 1.09 to 1.25 ug/cmzlhr
`with the additional effect of having altered the
`initial burst effect and subsequent sustenance
`of the pseudo-zero-order delivery profile. As
`can be seen in Figure #2, higher silicone to
`acrylic psa ratios resulted in a shift of the
`permeation profile from a pseudo-zero-order
`to a first order delivery system incapable of
`sustaining the targeted 84 hour delivery.
`
`
`.._l
`Inssal Avr-
`I
`ll
`II
`-
`II
`——+- «I
`I
`II
`-
`‘l
`+ "I I
`"0— “I I
`II
`H
`l
`
`__
`
`n..-memo
`an-..
`
`Fig-rel -Elfeetof$llleoleloAtrylk Rational E‘Jtndtol Flu
`
`Conclusion
`
`Alteration of thermodynamic driving force in
`a dmg-in-adhcsive transdermal drug delivery
`system by manipulation of pressure sensitive
`adhesive
`ratios
`in
`a
`blend of
`these,
`specifically silicone and acrylic psa's, can
`have a substantial effect on the rate and extent
`of skin permeation for selected molecular
`entities. By adjusting the ratio of these,
`the
`formulator
`is
`afforded
`a
`cost-effective
`alternative
`to
`permeation
`enhancement
`without the deleterious effects on the physical
`and wear properties of the product which
`result from addition of large amounts of drug
`or surfactant-like channel enhancers.
`
`Acknowledgements
`To Dow coming Corporation and National
`Starch Company for their technical support of
`our research and development projects.
`
`418
`
`m "'1"- SYMP- Control. R". 810m- Main. 26 (Revised July 1999) Controlled Release Society. Inc.
`
`L___
`
`0003
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket