throbber
American Pharmacists Association"'
`mproving medication use. Advancing patient care.
`
`Page 1
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2008
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00168
`
`

`

`.IOU NALOF
`
`A Publication of the Arnerican Pharrnacists Association
`
`APhA
`
`A Publication of the Board of Pharrnaceutical
`Sciences of the International Pharrnaceutical

`Federation
`
`American Association of
`Pharmaceutical Scientists
`
`Published in Coo
`Association of
`
`eration with the Arnerican
`armaceutical Scientists
`
`The Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Print ISSN 0022-3549; Online
`ISSN 1520-6017 at Wiley Interscience, www.interscience.wiley.com)
`is published monthly (one volume per year), by Wiley-Liss, Inc., through
`Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., a Wiley Company, 111 River Street,
`Hoboken, NJ 07030, and the American Pharmacists Association, 2215
`Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20037.
`Copyright © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc., a Wiley Company, and the
`American Pharmacists Association. All rights reserved. No part of this
`publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, except as
`permitted under section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright
`Act, without either the prior written permission of the publisher, or
`authorization through the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood
`Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, Tel.: (978) 750-8400, Fax: (978) 750-4470.
`Periodicals postage paid at Hoboken, NJ and at additional mailing
`offices.
`The copyright notice appearing at the bottom of the first page of an
`article in this journal indicates the copyright holder's consent that 2
`copies may be made for personal or internal use, or for personal or
`internal use of specific clients, on the condition that the copier pay for
`copying beyond that permitted by law. This consent does not extend to
`other kinds of copying such as copying for general distribution, for
`advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or
`for resale. Such permission requests and other permission inquiries
`should be addressed to the Permissions Department, c/o John Wiley &
`Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030; Tel.: (201) 748-6011;
`Fax: (201) 748-6008; or visit http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
`Subscription Price (Volume 96, 2007): Print only: $1,295.00 in U.S.,
`Canada, and Mexico, $1,352.00 outside North America. For all other
`prices please consult the journal's website at www.interscience.wiley.
`com/jpharmsci. Subscriptions at the personal rate are available to
`individuals. All subscriptions containing a print element, shipped outside
`U.S., will be sent by air. Payment must be made in U.S. dollars drawn on
`U.S. bank. Claims for undelivered copies will be accepted only after the
`following issue has been delivered. Please enclose a copy of the mailing
`label. Missing copies will be supplied when losses have been sustained in
`transit and where reserve stock permits. Please allow four weeks for
`processing a change of address. For subscription inquiries, please call
`(201) 748-6645; E-mail: SUBINFO@ wiley.com.
`
`Postmaster: Send address changes to Journal of Pharmaceutical
`Sciences, Subscription Distribution, c/o John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 ,
`River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. For subscription inquiries, please call
`customer service at (201) 748-6645 or write to the above address.
`Advertising Sales: Inquiries concerning advertising should be
`forwarded to Advertising Sales, c/o John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River
`Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-8832.
`Manuscript Submission: Five copies of the manuscript must be 1
`submitted together with a transmittal letter and a signed Copyright
`Transfer Agreement to the Editor: Dr. Ronald T. Borchardt, Department
`of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, The University of Kansas, 2095 Constant
`Ave., Room 121A, Lawrence, KS 66047. [Tel: (785) 864-5919; Fax: (785)
`864-5875; E-mail: rborchardt@ku.edu or tdunning@ku.edu]
`Reprints: Reprint sales and inquiries should be directed to the
`Customer Service Department, c/o John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River
`Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, Tel.: (201) 748-8789.
`Other Correspondence: Address all other correspondence to
`Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Publisher, STM, c/o John Wiley &
`Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030 or jpsprod@wiley.com.
`The contents of this journal are indexed in the following: Analytical
`Abstracts (RSC), CAB Abstracts'il' (CAB!), Cambridge Scientific Abstracts
`(CIG), CCR Database (Thomson lSI), Chemical Abstracts Service/
`SciFinder (ACS), Chemistry Server Compound Center (Th,Qlnson IS]},
`Chemistry Server Reaction Center (Thomson ISI), ChemPrepTM (Thom(cid:173)
`son lSI), Chimica Database (Elsevier), Chromatography Abstracts (RSC), ~
`Current Chemical Reactions 11 (Thomson lSI), Current Contents n !Life
`Sciences (Thomson IS!), ·EMBASE I Excerpta Medica (Elsevier), Index
`Chemicus 11 (Thomson lSI), Index Medicus I MEDLINE I PubMed (NLM),
`International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (Thomson lSI), MDL Beilstein
`(Elsevier), Reaction Citation Index™ (Thomson lSI), Reference Update
`(Thomson lSI), Science Citation Index 11 (Thomson ISI), Science Citation
`Index Expanded™ (Thomson lSI), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and SIIC
`Databases (Sociedad Iberoamericana de Informacion Cientifica).
`
`This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO
`Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
`
`Page 2
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2008
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00168
`
`

`

`I
`
`VOlUME 96, NUMBER 2
`FEBRUARY 2007
`
`REVIEW
`
`Lipid Formulation Strategies for Enhancing Intestinal Transport and Absorption of
`P-Glycoprotein (P-gp) Substrate Drugs: In vitro/In vivo Case Studies
`Panayiotis P. Constantinides* and Kishor M. Wasan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 18 October 2006
`
`235
`
`COMMENTARY
`
`On the Calculation of the Concentration Dependence of Drug Binding to Plasma
`Proteins with Multiple Binding Sites of Different Mfinities: Determination of the
`Possible Variation of the Unbound Drug Fraction and Calculation of the Number of
`Binding Sites of the Protein
`Leonid M. Berezhkovskiy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 18 October 2006
`
`COMMUNICATIONS
`
`Diffusion of Nutrients Molecules and Model Drug Carriers Through Mucin Layer
`Investigated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Chemical Shift Resolution
`Geraldine Lafitte,* Krister Thuresson, and Olle Soderman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 12 October 2006
`
`Quantitation of Crystalline Material within a Liquid Vehicle using
`1H/19F CP!MAS NMR
`BrianT. Farrer,* Andrey Peresypkin, and Robert M. Wenslow
`Published online 18 October 2006
`
`RESEARCH ARTIClES
`
`BIOTECHNOlOGY
`
`Quantitation of Aggregate Levels in a Recombinant Humanized Monoclonal
`Antibody Formulation by Size-Exclusion Chromatography, Asymmetrical Flow
`Field Flow Fractionation, and Sedimentation Velocity
`John P. Gabrielson, Mark L. Brader, Allen H. Pekar, Kathrin B. Mathis, Gerhard Winter,
`John F. Carpenter, and Theodore W. Randolph* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 1 November 2006
`
`249
`
`258
`
`264
`
`268
`
`Volume 96, Number 2 was mailed the week of January 25, 2007.
`
`(continued)
`
`journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
`VOL. 96, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2007
`
`&!!WILEY
`
`In r
`
`www.interscience.wiley.com
`
`Page 3
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2008
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00168
`
`

`

`DRUG DISCOVERY INTERFACE
`
`Impact of Cremophor-EL and Polysorbate-SO on Digoxin Permeability across Rat
`Jejunum: Delineation of Thermodynamic and Transporter Related Events Using
`the Reciprocal Permeability Approach
`Kasiram Katneni, Susan A. Charman, and Christopher J.H. Porter*
`Published online 18 October 2006
`
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`PHARMACEUTICS PREFORMULATION AND DRUG DELIVERY
`
`Factors Mfecting the Formation of Eutectic Solid Dispersions and Their
`Dissolution Behavior
`Sudha R. Vippagunta,* Zeren Wang, Stefanie Hornung, and Steven L. Krill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 18 October 2006
`
`Iontophoretic Drug Delivery across Human Nail
`S. Narasimha Murthy,* Dora E. Wiskirchen, and Christopher Paul Bowers
`Published online 1 November 2006
`
`Precipitation Complexation Method Produces Cannabidiol/p-Cyclodextrin Inclusion
`Complex Suitable for Sublingual Administration of Cannabidiol
`Janne Manni Ia, * Tomi Jarvinen, Kristiina Jarvinen, and Pekka Jarho . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 18 October 2006
`
`Selectivity of Similar Compounds Identification Using IR Spectroscopy: Steroids
`Nina Sadlej-Sosnowska* and Agnieszka Ocios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 18 October 2006
`
`Analysis of Coating Structures and Interfaces in Solid Oral Dosage Forms by
`Three Dimensional Terahertz Pulsed Imaging
`J. Axel Zeitler, Yaochun Shen, Colin Baker, Philip F. Taday,* Michael Pepper, and Thomas Rades . . . .
`Published online 30 October 2006
`
`Air-Liquid Interface (ALI) Culture of Human Bronchial Epithelial Cell Monolayers as
`an In Vitro Model for Airway Drug Transport Studies
`Hongxia Lin, Hong Li, Hyun-Jong Cho, Shengjie Bian, Hwan-Jung Roh, Min-Ki Lee, Jung Sun Kim,
`Suk-Jae Chung, Chang-Koo Shim, and Dae-Duk Kim*
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 1 November 2006
`
`Effect of Moisture and Pressure on Tablet Compaction Studied With FTIR
`Spectroscopic Imaging
`Noha Elkhider, K.L. Andrew Chan, and Sergei G. Kazarian* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 1 November 2006
`
`Hot-Melt Extrusion for Enhanced Delivery of Drug Particles
`Dave A. Miller, Jason T. McConville, Wei Yang, Robert 0. Williams Ill,* and James W. McGinity*
`Published online 30 October 2006
`
`The Relationship Between Water Vapor Absorption and Desorption by Phospholipids
`and Bilayer Phase Transitions
`Heidi M. Mansour* and George Zografi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 1 November 2006
`
`280
`
`294
`
`305
`
`312
`
`320
`
`330
`
`341
`
`351
`
`361
`
`377
`
`PHARMACEUTICAl NANOTECHNOLOGY
`
`Biodistribution and Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Long-Circulating Thiolated Gelatin
`Nanoparticles Following Systemic Administration in Breast Cancer-Bearing Mice
`Sushma Kommareddy and Mansoor Amiji* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 30 October 2006
`
`397
`
`Page 4
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2008
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00168
`
`

`

`PHARMACEUTICAl TECHNOlOGY
`
`Modified Cellulose II Powder: Preparation, Characterization, and
`Tableting Properties
`Maria de Ia Luz Reus Medina and Vijay Kumar*
`Published online 30 October 2006
`
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`Preparation of Insulin Loaded PLGA-Hp55 Nanoparticles for Oral Delivery
`Fu-de Cui,* An-jin Tao, Dong-mei Cun, Li-qiang Zhang, and Kai Shi
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 18 October 2006
`
`In Vivo Drug Metabolism Model for Human Cytochrome P450 Enzyme Using
`Chimeric Mice with Humanized Liver
`Miki Katoh, Tashiro Sawada, Yoshinori Soeno, Miki Nakajima, Chise Tateno, Katsutoshi Yoshizato,
`and Tsuyoshi Yokoi* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 18 October 2006
`
`Modifying Drug Release and Tablet Properties of Starch Acetate Tablets by
`Dry Powder Agglomeration
`Riikka Maki, * Eero Suihko, Susanne Rost, Minna Heiskanen, Matti Murtomaa, Vesa-Pekka Lehto,
`and Jarkko Ketolainen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 30 October 2006
`
`Determination of the Hydrolysis Kinetics of ct-Naphthyl Acetate in Micellar Systems
`and the Effect of HPMC (Catalyst Present)
`Pornpen Werawatganone and Dale Eric Wurster*
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 30 October 2006
`
`PHARMACOKINETICS, PHARMACODYNAMICS AND DRUG METABOliSM
`
`Development and Validation of a Preclinical Food Effect Model
`Kimberley A. Lentz,* Megan Quitko, Daniel G. Morgan, James E. Grace Jr., Carol Gleason,
`and Punit H. Marathe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Published online 30 October 2006
`
`408
`
`421
`
`428
`
`438
`
`448
`
`459
`
`In papers with more than one author, an asterisk(*) in the byline indicates the author to whom
`inquiries should be directed.
`
`Page 5
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2008
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00168
`
`

`

`Iontophoretic
`
`rug
`
`G 1very across uman Nail
`
`S. NARASIMHA MURTHY,1 DORA E. WISKIRCHEN/ CHRISTOPHER PAUl BOWERS3
`
`1 Department of Pharmaceutics, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi 38677
`
`2Department of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Raabe College of Pharmacy,
`Ohio Northern University, Ada, Ohio 45810
`
`3 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio Northern University, Ada, Ohio 45810
`
`Received 14 March 2006; revised 26 June 2006; accepted 14 July 2006
`
`Published online 1 November 2006 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOl 10.1002 /jps.20757
`
`ABSTRACT: Topical trans-nail delivery of antifungal drugs is limited by several physico(cid:173)
`chemical and physiological factors. Use of chemical permeation enhancers has been a
`common approach for enhancing trans-nail delivery of drugs. The potential of physical
`permeation enhancement techniques has been found to be higher than the potential
`of chemical permeation enhancers in transdermal delivery of hydrophilic drugs and
`macromolecular therapeutic agents. However, application of physical permeation
`enhancement techniques has not been explored for trans-nail drug delivery. In the
`current work, iontophoresis was applied across human nail in vitro to assess its efficiency
`in enhancing drug delivery. Salicylic acid (SA) was used as test diffusant. The influence of
`pH, ionic strength, and current density was studied. Obviously, increase in current
`density increased the trans-nail transport flux. It appears that about 50-100 mM ionic
`strength is required for optimal conduction of electric current across nail. The flux
`enhancement factor (iontophoretic flux/passive flux) also increased with increase in pH
`due to increased ionization of SA. This study demonstrates the efficacy of iontophoresis in
`enhancing the trans-nail delivery of drugs. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the A1nerican
`Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 96:305-311, 2007
`Keywords:
`trans-nail; drug delivery; iontophoresis; salicylic acid
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Onychomycosis is fungal infection of the nail in
`which the infection is often deep seated in the nail
`stratums. Currently, it is treated by oral admin(cid:173)
`istration of antifungal drugs. The major task in
`treatment is to accumulate and maintain effective
`concentrations (above the minimum inhibitory
`concentrations (MIC)) of the drug in the deeper
`nail stratums during the treatment period. This
`requires large doses and frequent administration
`of drugs. Oral administration of antifungal ther(cid:173)
`apy is inherently associated with GI and systemic
`side effects. 1 Obviously, topical delivery is the
`most desired therapy due to relatively less severe
`
`Correspondence to: S. Narasimha Murthy (Telephone: 662-
`915-5164, Fax: 662-915-1177; E-mail: murthy@olemiss.edu)
`Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 96, 305-311 (2007)
`© 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association
`
`side effects and better patient compliance parti(cid:173)
`cularly in case of pediatric patients.
`The nail apparatus consists of nail folds, nail
`matrix, nail bed, hypochonium, and nail plate. The
`nail plate lies under the proximal nail fold and over
`the matrix, nail bed, and hypochoniium. The nail
`plate (0.25-0.6 mm) consists of tightly packed dead
`cells that are highly keratinized and less than 1%
`lipids. 2 For the topical therapy to be successful, the
`drug is required to penetrate across the nail plate
`and distribute in the nail stratums at therapeuti(cid:173)
`cally effective amounts (>MIC). Unfortunately,
`there are at least two factors that could limit the
`accumulation and activity of drugs in the nail on
`topical application. First, the physicochemical prop(cid:173)
`erties of the drug need to be favorable for absorption
`through nail matrix. The nail matrix is reported to
`be relatively more permeable to polar compounds
`4
`than nonpolar compounds. 3
`,
`
`6i?WILEY
`lnterScience®
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 96, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2007
`
`305
`
`Page 6
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2008
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00168
`
`

`

`306 ' MURTHY, WISKIRCHEN, AND BOWERS
`
`Second, binding of the drug to keratin reduces
`the availability of the free drug. Antifungal drugs
`are reported to possess high-binding affinity to
`keratin. 5 The drug, to elicit biological activity,
`should be present in the free form because the
`bound drug is not active. Therefore, the total
`· amount of drug present in the nail matrix does not
`represent the actual active levels relative to MIC.
`This, most likely, is one of the reasons for pro(cid:173)
`longed durations of treatment of nail disorders.
`Moreover, the bound form of the drug does not
`contribute to the concentration gradient due to the
`lack of thermodynamic activity. This decreases the
`amount of drug penetrating into the deeper nail
`layers. In agreement with this, Hui and coworkers
`found that a large portion of topically applied
`drugs were retained in the surface layers of the
`nail6 due to binding which reduced the depth of
`drug penetration in the nail.
`Nail drug delivery has been a topic of research
`interest for the past two decades. The common
`approach for enhancing nail drug delivery has been
`to use keratolytic and thiolytic agents. These agents
`are known to increase the permeability of nail
`matrix by chemical modification of keratin. How(cid:173)
`ever, their permeability enhancement potential is
`limited by the factors like penetrability of enhancer
`and the duration of its presence in the nail matrix
`might significantly influence the chemical modifi(cid:173)
`cation of keratin. 7 Physical permeation enhance(cid:173)
`ment techniques have been successfully utilized
`in the transdermal delivery of drugs. 8 They are
`known to possess greater permeability enhance(cid:173)
`ment potential compared to chemical enhancers in
`delivering hydrophilic and macromolecular thera(cid:173)
`peutic agents. However, up until now, there has
`been few reports regarding possible use of physical
`permeation enhancement techniques for nail drug
`delivery. James and coworkers9 carried out ionto(cid:173)
`phoresis of prednisolone sodium phosphate across
`thumb nail and determined the time course of
`prednisolone in plasma. They also discussed the
`possibilities of using iontophoresis for treating nail
`diseases. However, there is need for systematic
`preliminary studies to assess the efficacy and
`resolve the mechanistic aspects of iontophoresis
`across nail. In this direction, the current work was
`planned to assess the efficiency of iontophoresis in
`enhancing trans-nail delivery of drugs. It was
`hypothesized that the diffusion rate of drug
`through hydrated keratin (which acts like a hydro(cid:173)
`gel membrane) could be enhanced by iontophoretic
`driving force. The hypothesis was assessed by
`studying the transport of SA across the whole
`
`human nail plate. SA was chosen as a test permeant
`to assess the influence of various factors on ionto(cid:173)
`phoretic delivery.
`
`MATERIAlS AND METHODS
`
`Chemicals
`Salicylic acid (SA, Mol wt. 138.12, pKa 3.1),
`sodium chloride, sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric
`acid, potassium chloride, monobasic potassium
`phosphate (KH2P04), and dibasic sodium phos(cid:173)
`phate (Na2HP04·7H20) phosphoric acid were
`purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
`The buffers prepared were of 10 mM ionic
`strength. Additional sodium chloride was incor(cid:173)
`porated to increase the buffer to desired ionic
`strengths. In this paper, the mM value given in
`the parenthesis indicates the total ionic strength
`of the buffer.
`
`Human finger Nails
`
`The whole nail tips were obtained from the fingers
`and toes of healthy adults using nail clippers (IRB
`protocol# 1001). The nail plates having a thickness
`of about 400 11m were used for the studies. The
`thickness of nail plates used for a set of test and
`control experiments were within ±5%. The nail
`plates were washed, dried, and stored in desiccator
`until use. Prior to use, the nail plates were soaked
`for 6 h in the donor compartment buffer. This was
`done to hydrate the nail plate to impart flexibility
`and to avoid breaking of nails during mounting on
`to the diffusion cell set up.
`
`Transport Studies
`
`In vitro transport studies were carried out using
`Franz diffusion cells (Logan Instruments Ltd.,
`Somerset, NJ) fitted with a custom made Teflon
`nail holder (Fig. 1). Ag/AgCl electrodes (Select
`Engineering, Fitchburg, MA) were fixed at a
`distance of 2 mm from the nail in the donor and
`receiver chambers. Iomed Phoresor II dose con(cid:173)
`troller was used for appliGation of constant DC.
`The cathode was connected to the donor and the
`anode was connected to the receiver chamber
`electrodes. Drug solution (500 IlL) prepared in
`buffer was placed in the donor compartment. The
`receiver compartment volume was 5 mL. The
`active diffusion area was 0.25 cm2
`. The receiver
`compartment was stirred at 600 rpm with a 3-mm
`magnetic stir bar. Intermittent samples of 0.5 mL
`were drawn from the receiver compartment at 2 h
`
`jOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 96, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2007
`
`DOl 1 0.1 002/jps
`
`
`
`Page 7
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2008
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00168
`
`

`

`IONTOPHORETIC DRUG DELIVERY ACROSS HUMAN NAIL
`
`307
`
`Nail adapter __ _
`
`Nail
`
`I I - - - - Donor
`Chamber
`
`pH 7.1 buffer (50 mM) irrespective of the
`buffer medium present in the donor cham(cid:173)
`ber.
`d. Effect of current density: PBS (50 mM,
`pH 7.1) buffer containing 2 mg/mL SA was
`placed in the donor chamber. The plain
`buffer was used in the receiver compart(cid:173)
`ment. The current densities applied were
`0.16, 0.3, and 0.5 mNcm2
`.
`
`Receiver
`chamber
`
`Analytical Method
`
`Figure 1. Trans-nail diffusion experimental set up.
`The receiver chamber was of 5 mL and donor was 500 ~tL
`capacities. The custom made Teflon nail adapter holding
`the nail was sandwiched between the two chambers and
`secured with clamps.
`
`intervals for 24 h and the amount of SA
`transported was measured. 9 Equal volume of
`fresh buffer was replaced in the receiver compart(cid:173)
`ment followed by each sampling. In all except the
`experiments in which the influence of current
`density was examined, the applied current den(cid:173)
`sity was 0.5 mNcm2
`. Passive transport experi(cid:173)
`ments were run in parallel with iontophoretic
`experiments wherever necessary, and the data
`are shown in the figures for comparison. The
`concentration of chloride ion after the transport
`experiments was measured in the donor and the
`receiver compartment buffers to be sure that the
`buffers contained sufficient chloride ions till the
`end of the experiment.
`
`a. Effect of concentration of SA: Different
`concentration solutions of SA were prepared
`in PBS buffer (pH 7.1, 50 mM) and placed in
`the donor compartment.
`b. Effect of ionic strength: The phosphate
`buffer of 10 mM ionic strength (pH 7.1) was
`adjusted to desired total ionic strength by
`incorporation of additional sodium chloride
`(0-140 mM). The concentration of salicylic
`acid in these buffers was 2 mg/mL. The PBS
`(pH 7 .1) buffer with the same ionic strength
`as that of donor was present in the receiver
`compartment.
`c. Effect of pH: All buffers were phosphate
`buffers with additional sodium chloride
`incorporated to
`increase the total ionic
`strength to 50 mM. The concentration of
`salicylic acid in these buffers was 2 mg/mL.
`The receiver compartment was filled with
`
`The amount of SA in the receiver compartment
`buffer was measured by fluorescence spectroscopy
`with a Hitachi FL2500 spectrofluorimeter. The
`sample drawn was diluted (1:4) with 0.05 M
`sodium hydroxide solution. The excitation wave(cid:173)
`length was 299 nm and the emission was at
`405 nm. Standard calibration curves were
`prepared in each buffer system. The sensitivity
`of the method was 10 ng/mL. The linearity was
`between 10 and 500 ng/mL (R 2 = 0.991). 9
`Control trials of iontophoresis across nail were
`run by placing plain buffers. The samples with(cid:173)
`drawn were treated the same way as described
`above and the fluorescence was measured at 2-h
`intervals for 24 h. No background fluorescence was
`observed. It is most likely that the no fluorescent
`components from the nail leached into the medium.
`Moreover, the emission wavelength of keratin
`( 450 nm) is out side the emission wavelength of
`SA.lO,ll
`
`Data Treatment
`
`The flux was calculated from the slope of the linear
`part of the cumulative transport-time profile. The
`permeability coefficient was calculated as the ratio
`of flux to the concentration of SA in donor. The
`curve fitting and statistical analysis was carried out
`using GraphPad Prism 3.03 software. An ANOVA
`was selected as the test for significance and a
`P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically
`significant. The data points provided in the graphs
`are an average of three trials. The error bars repre(cid:173)
`sent the standard deviation.
`
`RESUlTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Passive Transport of SA across Nail
`
`Effect of Concentration
`
`The trans-nail flux of SA increased with the
`concentration of SA in the donor compartment
`
`DOl 10.1 002/jps
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 96, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2007
`
`Page 8
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2008
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00168
`
`

`

`308
`
`MURTHY, WISKIRCHEN, AND BOWERS
`
`5
`
`5
`
`4.5 -:-l
`
`(,)
`
`4
`E
`2: tb 3.5
`..3-
`3
`<C
`(/)
`.....
`0
`)(
`j
`2
`li:
`•t;
`s;: 1.5
`CJ' c
`... 1-
`"'
`
`2.5
`
`1
`
`0.5
`
`0
`
`t
`
`~ 4.5
`E
`4
`::2
`~ 3.5
`3
`..... 2.5
`2
`
`(.)
`
`<(
`(/)
`
`0
`X
`:J
`16::
`"(ij
`£: u,
`«< ...
`1-
`
`£:
`
`1.5
`
`0.5
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0.5
`
`1
`
`1.5
`
`2
`
`Concentration of Salicylic acid {mglml)
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`pH
`
`6
`
`8
`
`Figure 2. Trans-nail flux of salicylic acid at different
`concentrations of SA. The filled triangles represent the
`passive transport and the filled circles represent
`iontophoretic transport. Donor chamber contained
`different concentration of SA prepared in PBS (pH 7.1,
`50m.M).
`
`Figure 3.
`Influence of pH on the passive transport
`flux (filled triangles) and iontophoretic transport flux
`(filled circles) of SA. All solutions were of 50 mM ionic
`strength. SA solution (500 ~LL of 2 mg/mL) in the
`respective buffers was placed in the donor. The receiver
`compartment was filled with PBS (50 m.M) in all cases.
`
`solution (Fig. 2). The lag time remained consistent
`(rv8 h). The permeability coefficient of human nail
`for salicylate was rvl.94 x 10-8 ± 0.31 cm/s which
`is comparable with the values reported for similar
`type of ionic drug substrates by Kobayashi and
`coworkers. 12
`
`Effect of pH
`Walters and coworkers13 studied the permeation
`of the weakly basic drug, miconazole, through
`hydrated human nail plate. They found that the
`permeability coefficient of the drug was essen(cid:173)
`tially the same at all pH values. Whereas, Soong
`and coworkers found that unionized benzoic acid
`was more permeable than ionized form due to the
`repulsion of benzoate ion by the negatively
`charged hoof membrane at pH>5. 13 In this paper,
`the influence of pH on the passive transport of SA
`was studied. At a fixed donor concentration of SA,
`the passive transport flux was pH dependent. As
`compared to pH at 1.2, the trans-nail flux at pH 3
`was about one half (Fig. 3). At pH 5 or 7, the trans(cid:173)
`nail flux was about one third the value seen at pH
`1.2. pH-dependent transport behavior of drugs
`across the nail plate has been argued generally on
`the basis ofpH-pKa relationship. One should note
`that these studies were carried out at gradient pH
`conditions across the nail plate. Although the nail
`was soaked in the donor compartment buffer, it is
`
`plausible that the charge density of the mem(cid:173)
`brane was altered due to its contact with the
`receiver compartment buffer. In the present
`context, assuming that the charge density on the
`membrane is primarily influenced by the donor
`compartment buffer, we can postulate four types
`of pH-pKa-dependent conditions to explain the
`transport of SA across the nail keratin matrix.
`First, at pH 1.2, the SA (pKa 3.1) is almost
`completely in the unionized form and the keratin
`membrane is positively charged (pi rv5). 13
`14 At
`,
`this pH, the transport that resulted could be
`attributed to the permeability of nail matrix to the
`unionized form of SA. Second, at pH 3, the
`membrane is positively charged and the drug is
`rv50% ionized. It is not clear if the decrease in the
`trans-nail flux of SA at pH 3 to one half of that at
`pH 1.2 is due to binding of the anionic drug
`to positively charged keratin membrane. It is
`also not clear to what extent the ionized fraction
`binds to the keratin as nothing is ~nown about the
`charge density of keratin matrix. Third and
`fourth conditions are pH 5 and pH 7 .1, respec(cid:173)
`tively, at which the drug is 99%-100% ionized.
`However, the keratin matrix is most likely to
`carry significantly less charge density at pH 5 as
`compared to pH 7.1 (pi of keratin is rv5). One
`would expect significantly less trans-nail flux of
`salicylate at pH 7.1, as opposed to pH 5, due to the
`likelihood of repulsion of salicylate ion by the
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 96, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2007
`
`00110.1002/jps
`
`Page 9
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2008
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00168
`
`

`

`IONTOPHORETIC DRUG DELIVERY ACROSS HUMAN NAIL
`
`309
`
`negatively charged keratin membrane. In con(cid:173)
`trast, in the present work there was no significant
`difference in the trans-nail flux of SA at these two
`pH conditions (Fig. 3). These results indicate
`that the pH-dependent transport behavior of ion(cid:173)
`izable substances across the keratin matrix is
`primarily influenced by factors other than the
`charge. Apparently, the alternate factor that
`could influence the diffusion is the thermody(cid:173)
`namic activity of the drug in the donor compart(cid:173)
`ment.
`The thermodynamic activity of a drug solution
`is expressed as a fraction of the saturation
`solubility. Therefore, the thermodynamic activity
`of saturated solution of a drug is regarded as
`unity. 15 The solubility of SA at pH 1.2, 3, and at
`pH 5 or 7.1 is 2.74, 11.2, and rv > 894 mg/mL, res(cid:173)
`pectively, at the present experimental conditions.
`Relative to these solubility values, the donor solu(cid:173)
`tion of 2 mg/mL used in this study corresponds to
`thermodynamic activity of 0. 7' 0.2, and rv0.002
`at pH 1.2, 3, and 5 or 7.1, respectively. 16 This
`explains the difference in trans-nail flux of SA
`at different pH conditions. Walter's observation
`about pH-independent miconazole
`trans-nail
`transport is most likely due to the fact that the
`solubility or the thermodynamic activity of the
`drug did not differ significantly at different pH
`17
`buffers. 11
`18 However, in these explanations, the
`'
`,
`influence of pH of the donor solution on the nature
`and integrity of the membrane is not considered.
`Further investigation of the influence of pH on the
`permeability characteristics of keratin matrix
`could provide additional insight into this phenom(cid:173)
`enon.
`
`Iontophoretic Delivery of SA across Nail
`
`Cathodal iontophoresis was applied to effect
`electrorepulsion of salicylate anion. The ionto(cid:173)
`phoretic transport flux of SA increased with the
`increase in the SA concentration in the donor
`compartment buffer up to 2 mg/mL (Fig. 2). The
`lag time di

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket