throbber

`
`*#$##**#*#**#$$t
`D
`0569 SCI 522816X 08/
`LOWELL H ERICSSCN
`6296 89TH
`E
`MERCER.
`IS
`
`PFIZER EX. 1026
`
`Page 1
`
`PFIZER EX. 1026
`Page 1
`
`

`

`AMERICAN
`Assocv.TION FOR THE
`ADVANCEMENT OF
`ScIBNCB
`
`SciENCE ISSN 0036-8075
`
`9 JANUARY 1987
`VOLUME 235
`NUM.BER +785
`
`•OdhMIM- 141
`•d i i ik - 144
`
`139 This Weck in Science
`
`Fraud in Science:
`
`Misuse of the Freedom of Information Act: J. R. WILLIAMS • Ri.idenberg's
`Patents: J. L. HUMMER • Quality of Biomedical Literature: R. G. MARTIN •
`Quantitative Risk Aspects of the "Woburn Case": M. T. SMITH • Moonlight and
`Circadian Rhythms: R. M. SINCLAIR; C. A. CzBISLBR AND J. S. ALLAN •
`Research Practices: W. W. STEWART AND N. FEDER
`
`Science Budget: More of the Same • R&D and the Deficit
`Peer Rcview-'oops--Merit Review in for Some Changes at NSF
`Cancer M.D.'s Clash over Interleukin Therapy
`Landsat Commercialization Stumbles Again
`Hazardous Waste: Where to Put It?
`EEC Research Program in Jeopardy
`Court Rejeets Rifkin in Biotech Cases
`Math Papers Called lnaccc:ssible
`Briefing: Comings and Goings
`
`Oncogenes Give Breast Cancer Prognosis
`Materials Scientists Seek a Unified Voice
`Diabetics Should Lose Weight, Avoid Diet Fads • High-Carb Diets Questioned
`Delving into Faults and Earthquake Behavior: How to Stop a Quake by Jogging
`• Earthquakes Arc Giving Little Warning • Coastal Ups and Downs Point to a
`Big Quake • Cutting the Gordian Knot of the San Andreas
`
`Community Diversity: Relative Roles of Local and Regional Processes:
`R. E. RICKLEFS
`Band-Gap Engineering: From Physics and Materials to New Semiconductor
`Devices: F. CAPASSO
`Human Breast Cancer: Correlation of Relapse and Survival with Amplification of
`the HER-2/neu Oncogene: D. J. SI.AMON, G. M. CLARK, S. G. WONG,
`w. J. LEVIN, A. ULLRICH, W. L. McGUIRE
`The Atomic Strucrure of Mengo Virus at 3.0 A Resolution: M. Luo,
`G. VRJBND, G. KAMER, I. MINOR, E. ARNOLD, M. G. ROSSMANN, u. BOEGE,
`D. G. SCRABA, G. M. DUKE, A. C. PALMENBERG
`
`SCIENCE II publlllled "*ly on Fr1dey, ••cei>I Ille 11e1 -
`wttll en H1nl " - In Fetwue,y
`In - . -
`ol Science, 1333 H SIJNC, NW, WNlllngton, DC 20005. S.C,.
`by the American ANoclellon lor the -
`oncl-dass postage (publication No. 484-460) paid at Washlnglon. DC. and at an additional entry. Now combined with The
`Scientific~~ Copyright C> 1987 by the American Association tor the Advancement ol Science. The title SCI·
`ENCE la a registered trlldemlsl< o1 the MAS. ~ individual - ip and oulJocription (51 -
`): 165. Do(cid:173)
`mestic lnstitutlonal 51Jb9cription (51 Issues): $98. Fo,eign poslage ..tra.: C..- $32. Oll>e< (IIU!face md) $27. lir-sur(cid:173)
`faco via -.tam $65. First ciaos, airmail. - -· and sulonl ,_ on rlqUNI. Single ooplN $2.50 ($3 by moi);
`bad< Issues S4 ($4.50 by mail): Biotechnology issue. SS.50 (S6 by mu): ctassroom ratn on ~
`: Gulde to Blotoch·
`notogy Products and Instruments $16 ($17 by mai~. Ctw,ge a l - : . - s - .. gMng old and new -
`and seven-<ligit account numbaf. Authorization to pl-.x,py matarieJ lo< lntemeJ °' po<sOnal -
`unoe, cltcumstancea
`not fall ng within Ille flir uoe provisions ol the Copyright Ad is granted by MAS to 1barin and Oll>e< ,-a regiswed
`with the Copyright Cleerance Center (CCC) T...-ia! Reporting Servioo. provided that lhe -
`fee ol S1 per copy
`p4ua $0.10 per page la paid directly to CCC, 21 Congresa Street. Salem. MassachUMlts 01970. The ldontiticalion code
`lo< Science la 0036-8075183 $1 + .10. - : Send Form 3579 to Science, 1333 H 5tJwt, NW, WUhlngton, DC
`spec:iallnd lndoxn .
`The American Aasoclation ""the Advancement o1 Science wu lcundod in 1848 an d~ 1n 1s1,. 11s ot,fects
`are to lur1het' the won< ol sdentista. to facilitate cooperation among them. to looter !dentific -
`and ""'l)()f\1li>.
`to lmpn,Ye the elloctlveness of oc:ience In the promotion ol human -
`.... and to lncfeue public undemanding and ap(cid:173)
`preciation of the i~ and promise ol the methods ol oc:ience In human progress.
`
`20005. Science is Indexed In lhe -s Guide to Periodical l.itrntun, and In -
`
`SCIENCE, VOL. 235
`
`WiW&ibhhhih- 151
`
`153
`154
`155
`156
`158
`159
`
`•RliiiUiWtWt- 160
`
`161
`163
`165
`
`167
`
`172
`
`177
`
`182
`
`•
`
`•
`
`136
`
`PFIZER EX. 1026
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Lava flow after eruption of Mauna Loa Volcano, March 1984. Lava
`COVBll
`flows advanced nearly 20 kilometers in about 5 days toward the city of Hilo,
`largest city on the island of Hawaii. The flow slowed and stopped about 8
`kilometers from nearest buildings on city's outskirts. All eruptive activity ceased
`by early April 1984. Sec page 196. [Scott Lopez, National Park Service]
`
`Outward-Dipping Ring-Fault Structure at Rabaul Caldera as Shown by
`Earthquake Locations: J. Molli AND C. McKEE
`Sensory Tuning of Lateral Linc Receptors in Antarctic Fish to the Movements of
`Planktonic Prey: J. C. MoNTGOMEllY AND J. A. MACDONALD
`Disruption of the Mauna Loa Magma System by the 1868 Hawaiian Earthquake:
`Geochemical Evidence: R. I. TILLING, J. M. RHODES, J. W. SPAllKS,
`J. P. LocICWOOD, P. W. LIPMAN
`Oxygen Supersaturation in the Ocean: Biological Versus Physical Contributions:
`H. CllAJG AND T. HAYWAllD
`Identification of a Juvenile Hormone-Like Compound in a Crustacean:
`H. l..AUFEll, D. BORST, F. c. BAJCEll, c. CAllllAsco, M. SINKUS, c. C. REtrrEll,
`L. w. TSAI, D. A. ScHOOLBY
`Evolution of Male Pheromones in Moths: Reproductive Isolation Through Sexual
`Selection?: P. L. PHELAN AND T. C. BAJCEll
`Direct Aaivation of Mammalian Atrial Muscarinic Porassium Channels by GTP
`Regulatory Protein Gk: A. YATANI, J. CoDINA, A. M. BllOWN, L. BIRNBAUMEll
`Mctalloregulatory DNA-Binding Protein Encoded by the merR Gene: Isolation
`and Characterization: T. O'HALI.ollAN AND C. WALSH
`Nerve Growth Factor Treatment After Brain Injury Prevents Neuronal Death:
`L. F. l<B.OMEll
`Lung Cancer and Indoor Air Pollution in Xuan Wei, China: J. L. MuMFOllD,
`X. Z. HE, R. S. CHAPMAN, S. R. CAo, D. B. HAlllUs, X. M. LI, Y. L. XIAN,
`W. Z. JIANG, C. W. Xu, J. C. CHUANG, W. E. WILSON, M. CooKB
`Preferred Microtubulcs for Vesicle Transpon in Lobster Axons: R. H. MILLE&,
`R. J. LAsEK, M. J. KATZ
`
`The Darwinian Heritage, rer>ie'tPed by A. DESMOND • Confronting Nature,
`Y. GINGllAS • Are Australian Ecosystems Different?, G. H . OIUANs • Under the
`Qoud and Justice Downwind, R. A. DMNE • Books Received
`
`Portable Macroscope • Diacylglycerol Kinase • Polyacrylarnide Gels for
`Electrophoresis • FORTRAN Language Subroutines • PVC Tubing • Miniature
`Centrifuge • Tcfton-Coated Slides • Literature
`
`193
`
`195
`
`196
`
`199
`
`202
`
`205
`
`207
`
`211
`
`214
`
`217
`
`220
`
`224
`
`MUiiihh4**1MiGUMt• 229
`
`...... al Dlrecton
`Gerard Piel
`11111mg , ,_ ,,
`
`°"""'1an = Bogorad
`,,,_.,,_
`
`lllollaE. Wodnall
`
`__
`
`E -E. Balley
`David BaltimoNt
`William F. Bririunan
`Phllip E. Con-,,e
`Jooeph L Goldlteln
`James D. Idol, Jr.
`~ Knopo4I
`Seymour lJpoo!
`W-Musoy
`~E. Nollon
`Devld V. Ragone
`David M. Ral4>
`Vera C. Rullin
`Lally L Smarr
`Solomon H. Snyder
`Aol>el1M. So1ow
`Jameo D. Watoon
`
`-.iMcC. Adams
`-
`w. Bef1ine<
`Floyd e. Bloom
`Maly E. Clutter
`Milcnd s. Oresselhaus
`Donald N. Langenbe<g
`Dorothy Neikln
`Linda s. Wilson
`WIiiiam T. Golden
`T,...,,.,
`Wollam D. C.,oy
`Execut/veOflc:,er
`
`-o l~ng
`Edltora
`John-
`Oeil AI-Awqati
`JameoP. Alioon
`DonLAndlnon
`E-H.lllackbum
`Floyd E. Bloom
`Chat1N A. Canlor
`JamNH. Clarl<
`Bruce F. Eldndge
`StanleyF(cid:173)
`Theodo!11 H. Gebde
`Roger I. M. Glas
`6'opllln p. Gol
`-B. ~
`
`Co,wy s. Goodman
`RlchardM . . (cid:173)
`Glorla Heppner
`Eric:F. (cid:173)
`Kornd B. Ktauel<opf
`I. -
`l.elvnar,
`KIit L MOQloby
`JooephB. Martin
`John C. McGII
`
`Allon----Ollon
`
`Gordon H. Oriana
`John$. -
`
`Yeshayau Packer
`Jean Paul Revel
`James E. Rolhman
`Thomas C. Sc:hoUing
`Ronald H. Schw111Z
`Si,,pl1an M. Schwartz
`Otto T. Solbrig
`Robert T. N. ljlan
`VlrginlaTMlble
`Geerat J. verme,
`MartJn G. Weigert
`Harold Weintraub
`Irving L Weissman
`George M. Whitesides
`OwenN. Wotte
`Wl liam B. Wood
`
`9 JANUAllY 1987
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`137
`
`PFIZER EX. 1026
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Human Breast Cancer: Correlation of
`Relapse and Survival with Amplification
`of the HER-2/neu Oncogene
`D ENNIS J. SIAMON, * GARY M. CLARK, STEVEN G. WoNG, W ENDY J. L EVI N
`AxEL ULLRICH, WILLIAM L. McGUIRE
`
`The HER-2/neu oncogene is a member of the erbB-like
`oncogene family, and is related to, but distinct from, the
`epidermal growth factor receptor. This gene has been
`shown to be amplified in hwnan breast cancer cell lines.
`In the current srudy, alterations of the gene in 189
`primary hwnan breast cancers were investigated. HER-2/
`neu was found to be amplified from 2- to greater than 20-
`fold in 30% of the rumors. Correlation of gene amplifica(cid:173)
`tion with several disease parameters was evaluated. Am(cid:173)
`plification of the HER-2/neu gene was a significant pre(cid:173)
`dictor of both overall survival and time to _rel~pse in
`patients with breast cancer. It retained its sigoiticance
`even when adjustments were made for other known
`prognostic factors. Moreover, HER-2/neu amplification
`had greater prognostic value than most currently used
`prognostic factors, including hormonal-receptor status,
`in lymph node-positive disease. These data indicate that
`this gene may play a role in the biologic behavior and/or
`pathogenesis of human breast cancer.
`
`T HE EVIDENCE LINKING P ROTO-ONCOGENES TO TH E INDUC·
`
`tio11 or maintenance of human malignancies is largely cir(cid:173)
`cumstantial, but has become increasingly compelling. This
`circumstantial evidence is derived from studies of animal models,
`tumor cell lines and aetual human rumors. Data from ani mal models
`and cell lines include: (i) sequence homology between human proto(cid:173)
`oncogene and the viral oncogene of tran forming retroviruses that
`are known to be tumorigenic in some species (1, 2); (ii) transfection
`rudies showing the tran forming potential of prom-oncogenes in
`lH 3T3 ceUs and primary embryo fibroblasts (3- 5); and (iii) the
`central role of certain proto-oncogenes in cumorigenesi by chronic
`transforming retroviruses uch as avian leukosis viru (6). Data from
`human rumors include: (i) increa ed expression of pecific proto(cid:173)
`in ome human malignancies (7, 8); (ii) localization of
`oncogene
`proto-oncogenes at or near the site of pecific tumor-as ociaced
`chromo omal tran locations (9); and (iii) amplification of proto(cid:173)
`oncogenes in some human rumors (10, 11 ).
`Additional data linking prom-oncogenes to cell growth is their
`ex pre ion in respon e to cer:tain proliferation ignals (12, 13) and
`their expression during embryonic development (14, 15). More
`direct evidence comes from the fact that, of the 20 known proto(cid:173)
`oncogencs, three are related to a growth factor or a growth factor
`include c-sis which is homologous to the
`receptor. The e gene
`
`transforming gene of the imian sarcoma viru and i the J3 chain of
`platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) (16, 17) ; c-fois, which i
`homologous to the transforming gene of the feline sarcoma virus
`and is do cly related to the macrophage colony-stimulating factor
`receptor (CSF-l R) (18); and c-erbB, which encodes the EGF
`receptor (EGFR) and is highly homologous to the transforming
`gene of the avian erythroblasto is virus (19 ). The two receptor·
`related proto-oncogenes, c-fins and c-erbB, arc members of the
`tyrosine-specific protein kinase family to which many proto-onco(cid:173)
`gencs belong.
`Recently, a novel tran forming gene was identified as a result of
`transfection rudics with D A from chemically induced rat neu(cid:173)
`roglioblastomas (20). Thi gene, called neu, was shown to be related
`to, but di tinct from, the c-erbB proto-oncogene (21 ). By means of
`v-erbB and human EGFR as probes to screen human genomic and
`complementary DNA (cD A) libraries, two other group indepen(cid:173)
`dently isolated human erbB- related genes that they called HER-2
`(22) and c-erbB-2 (23). Subsequent sequence analy i and chromo(cid:173)
`somal mapping rudies revealed all three gene (nm, c-erbB-2, and
`HE R-2) to be the same (22, 24, 25). A fourth group, also using v(cid:173)
`erbB as a probe, identified the same gene in a mammary carcinoma
`cell line, MAC 117, where it was found to be amplified five- to ten(cid:173)
`fold (26).
`This gene, which we will call HER-2/nei,, encodes a new member
`of the tyrosine kinase family; and is do cly related to, but distinct
`from, the EGFR gene (22). HER-2/neu differ from EGFR in that it
`is found on band q2 1 of chromo omc 17 (22, 24, 25), as compared
`to band pll- pl3 of chromosome 7, where the EGFR gene is
`located (27) . Also, the HER-2/11e11 gene generates a messenger
`RNA (mRNA) of 4.8 kb (22), which differs from the 5.8- and IO(cid:173)
`kb transcripts for the EGFR gene (28). Finally, the protein encoded
`by the HER-2/tteu gene i 185,000 daltons (21 ), as compared to the
`170,000-dalton protein encoded by the EGFR gene. Conver ely, on
`the basi of equence data, HER-2/nm i more closely related to the
`EGFR gene than to ocher members of the tyrosine kinase famil y
`(22). Like the EGFR protein, HER-2/neu has an extracellular
`domain, a transmembrane domain that includes two cysteine-rich
`repeat clusters, and an intracellular kinase domain (21 ), indicating
`
`. G. Wong, and W. / . Levin ffl: in the Division of Hcmorolog)'·
`lamon,
`D. ).
`Oncology, Department or Medicine and Jo ns.son Comprchcnsi\'c Cancer Center,
`U LA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90024. G. M. Clork and W. L. McGuire
`arc in the Divisio n o f Oncology, Depann,cnt of Medicine, nh·ersit)' of Texas He,lth
`Science Center at San Antonio, San Anton io, T X 78284. A. UUrich is in the
`Department of Molecular Biology, Gcncntcch, Inc., South an Francisco, CA 94080.
`
`*'l"o whom co rrespondence should be: adcl=d.
`
`9 JANUARY 1987
`
`ARTlCLES 177
`
`PFIZER EX. 1026
`Page 4
`
`

`

`that it too i likely to be a ccUular recepror for an as yet unidentified
`ligand.
`Al> a result of the published data showing amplification ofHER-
`2/neu in a human mammary carcinoma cell line, and as pan of an
`ongoing survey in our laborarory of prom-oncogene abnormalities
`in human rumors, we evaluated alterations of the HER-2/,ieu gene
`in a large series of human primary breast cancers. Our results show
`that amplification of this gene occurs relatively frequently in breast
`cancer, and that it is associated with disease relapse and overall
`patient survival.
`Factor that are known to be imponant in the prognosis of breast
`malignancies in individual patients include: size of the primary
`rumor, stage of disease at diagnosis, hormonal receptor status, and
`number of axillary lymph nodes involved with disease (positive
`nodes) (29). The current study, which was conducted in two parts,
`involved the evaluation of tissue from 189 separate breast malignan(cid:173)
`cies that were pan of a breast cancer srudy ongoing at the Univer ity
`of Texas, San Antonio. This cohon of rumors was of interest
`because considerable information was available on the majority of
`the specimen including size of the primary rumor, estrogen recep·
`tor starus, progesterone receptor starus, age of patient, disease stage,
`and status of the axillary lymph nodes.
`In the initial survey, tissue from 103 prima.ry breast cancers was
`evaluated for alterations in the HER-2/neu gene. DNA from
`individual rumors was prepared as described (30), digested with
`Eco Rl, and subjected to Southern blot analysis with a 32P-labeled
`HER-2/nttt-l probe, which is known to detect a 13-kb hybridizing
`band in human D A (22). Examples of rumors from the initial
`survey are shown in Fig. l. Of the 103 samples examined, 19 (18%)
`showed evidence of HER -2/,ieu gene amplification. The degree of
`amplification in individual cases was determined by dilution analysis
`(Fig. 2A), as well as sofi: laser densitometry scanning. To determine
`that the amount of DNA loaded in each lane was equivalent, all
`filters were washed and rehybriclized with a 32P-labeled arginase
`gene probe (31 ). This probe identifies a 15-kb hybridizing band on
`Eco RI-digested human D A, and was selected as a control
`because ir more appropriately assesses the relative amount and
`
`Table 1. Association between HER·2Jneu amplification and disease parame-
`ters in I 03 breast rumors.
`
`Nwnbcr of cwnors
`
`Factor*
`
`Single
`copy
`
`2 to 5
`copies
`
`5 to 20
`copies
`
`> 20
`copies
`
`Pt
`
`Total
`
`ER+
`ER-
`PgR+
`PgR-
`
`s2
`2-5
`>5
`Unknown
`
`s50
`> 50
`Unknown
`
`0
`1-3
`>3
`Unknown
`
`53
`31
`42
`42
`
`13
`34
`17
`20
`
`21
`52
`11
`
`30
`20
`17
`17
`
`I
`4
`2
`3
`
`Humwnal naptur srlll'US
`2
`9
`2
`I
`2
`6
`s
`I
`Tumor si:u (unrimam)
`l
`1
`l
`5
`I
`2
`0
`3
`A,ge at diagnosis (yuin)
`I
`I
`2
`4
`2
`7
`0
`2
`0
`Number of positive lymph >U!da
`I
`0
`3
`I
`I
`0
`2
`4
`2
`I
`l
`3
`
`0
`1
`2
`2
`
`0.99
`
`0.85
`
`0.82
`
`0.83
`
`0.11
`
`65
`38
`52
`51
`
`15
`41
`22
`25
`
`25
`65
`13
`
`34
`22
`25
`22
`
`•Rcccpror st>.rus was analyzed as described (39). ER, c:srrogcn receptor: + and - «:fer
`co the presence or absence of ., 3 finol o( =cptor per inilligrun of protein. PgR,
`progc:stcronc receptor: + and - refers to the pr=ncc or abot:ncc of ;;,,S frnol of receptor
`per milli~ of protein.
`t Sotistical analyses for concb.tion of HER· 21""' amplifi ·
`cation with disease parameters we«: performed by the x' tc:st. P V2lucs were computed
`after combining the cases with S to 20 and > 20 copic:s.
`
`transfer of high molecular weight species than a probe hybridizing
`with low molecular weight pecics, which transfer more readily on
`Southern blotting. All lanes were hown to contain equivalent
`amounts of high molerular weight DNA (Fig. 2B). lnclividual
`rumors were assigned t0 groups containing a single copy, 2 to 5
`copies, 5 to 20 copies, and greater than 20 copies of the HER-2/,im
`gene (Fig. 1). Assignment of rumors to the various group was done
`
`Fig. 1. Analysis of alterations of the HER-2/neu
`gene in human breast cancer. hown arc 79 of the
`189 breast rumors used in this anal)•sis. Tumors
`with a single copy of HER-2/,m,: 3, 4, 10 to 15,
`20, 23 co 25, 27 to 29, 31, 38, 42 10 46, 48, 49,
`52, 55, 61, 65, 66, 71, 72, and 74. Tumors with
`two to 6ve copies of HER-2/,ieu: I, 2, 5, 7, 9, 16,
`17, 19, 21, 22, 32, 35, 36, 47, so, 54, 56 to 58,
`60, 62, 70, and 75 to 77. Tumors with 5 to 20
`copies of HER-2/neii: 6, 8, 26, 34, 37, 39 to 41,
`51, 53, 63, 64, 67, 69, 73, and 79. Tumors with
`more than 20 copies of HER-2/mu: 18, 30, 33,
`59, 68, and 78. Examples of rumors 77 10 79 have
`rearrangements in the HER-2/ner, gene. DNA
`W3S extracted from tissues and digested with Eco
`Rl as described (30). A total of 12 µg of Eco RI(cid:173)
`digested DNA was loaded onto 0.8% agarose
`gels, separated by electrophoresis, and rransferrcd
`onto nylon filter papers (Biodync) (30). All filters
`were baked in a vacuum oven for 3 hours at 80°C,
`prchybridizcd in 5 x
`(standard saline citrate)
`containing 50% formamide, 10% dcxtran sulfate,
`0.1 % SD , dcnarured salmon sperm D A ( 1 m~
`ml), and 4 X Dcnhardts solution for 12 hours,
`then hybridized in the same solution containing
`32P-labc:led nick-translated HER-2 probe (2/)
`specific activity of I x 108 cpm per microgram of
`DNA; 2 x 106 cpm/ml. Hybridization occurred
`at 42°C for 48 hours, foUowcd by washing of
`filters under the foUowing conditions in succcs·
`
`1 2 3 4 5
`
`• 6 7 8 9
`
`· 10 11 12 13 14
`
`15 16 17 18 19 20
`
`21 22 23 24 2526 2728 29
`1
`
`4142 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
`
`51 52 53 54 55 56 ST 58 58 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
`
`67 68 81 70 71 72 73 74 75 76
`
`n 1a 7'9
`
`kb
`•12
`
`- 4
`•31
`
`•18
`
`sion: 2 X SSC for 20 minutes at room tempera·
`rure; cwo washes of 30 minutes each in 2 x SSC,
`0.1% SOS at 65° ; one wash of 30 minures in
`
`, 0.1% D at 65°C. Filters were then
`O.Sx
`exposed 10 XAR-5 x-ray 6Jm (Kodak) for autora·
`diography.
`
`SCIENCE, VOL. 23S
`
`PFIZER EX. 1026
`Page 5
`
`

`

`2. (A) Example of dilutional analysis ro assess degree of HER-2/nn.
`pie amplification. Lanes a, g, k, and p were loaded with 12 µg of Eco RI(cid:173)
`digested breast rumor DNA. Lane a is DNA from rumor 31 (Fig. I), which
`rq,rcscnts a rumor with a single copy of the HER/2-nn. gene. Lane g is
`DNA &om rumor 33, which represents a rumor with > 20 copies of the
`HER-2/neu gene. Lanes bro fare serial dilutions (1:100, 1:20, 1: 10, 1:5,
`and I: 2, respectively) of the D A sample in lane g. Lane k is D A from
`nunor 35 (Fig. l ), which represents a tumor containing two to five copies of
`me HER-2/neu gene. Lanes b to j arc serial dilutions ( 1: 10, 1: 5, and 1:2,
`respectively) _of the D A sample in l~e k. Lane p is _D A from rumor 34
`(fig. 1), which represents a tumor with 5 to 20 copies of the HER-2/neu
`P· Lanes I ro o arc serial dilutions ( l: 20, l : 10, l: 5, and 1: 2, respectivc(cid:173)
`ly)__~f the D A sample in lane p. The filter was prepared and hybridized with
`a 31P-labclcd HER-2 probe as in Fig. I. (B) Example of arginasc probe
`hybridization to demonstrate that equivalent amounts of tumor D A were
`loaded inro each lane. Rehybridization of filter containing lanes 30 to 40
`(Fig. I). The filter was first stripped of label by washing in a buffer made up
`of 50% formamidc, 3x S , and 0.1% SDS at 65°C for 20 minutes,
`following by three su cessive washes of 5 minutes each in 0 .1 x SSC at room
`temperature. Filters were exposed overnight on XAR-5 film (Kodak) to
`ensure removal of all radioactive probe, then rchybriclizcd as in Fig. I with a
`np.tabelcd human arginasc gene probe (31).
`
`in a blinded fashion, in that they were made without knowledge of
`disease parameters. Analysis of the data for association between gene
`amplification and a number of clisease parameters was then per(cid:173)
`formed.
`Of 103 rumors evaluated in the initial survey, there was essentially
`no correlation between gene amplification and estrogen receptor
`starus, progesterone receptor starus, size of rumors, or age at
`diagnosis (Table l ). However, when analysis was performed for
`association between HER-2/neu amplification and number of posi(cid:173)
`tive lymph nodes, a trend was noted. This analysis showed that 4/34
`(11%) of patients with no involved nodes, 2/20 (10%) with l to 3
`involved nodes, and 8/25 (32%) with >3 involved nodes had gene
`amplification (P = 0.11 ). lfthese data were examined by comparing
`0 to 3 positive nodes versus > 3 positive nodes, the correlation with
`gene amplification became more significant (P < 0.05). Thus, there
`was a significant increase in incidence of HER-2/neu gene amplifica(cid:173)
`tion in patients with > 3 axillary lymph nodes involved with clisease.
`A multivariate regression analy is to correlate HER-2/neu amplifica(cid:173)
`tion with various di ease parameters identified the number of
`positive nodes as the only
`ignificant factor, either alone or in
`combination, to correlate with amplification.
`This initial srudy indicated that it might be possible to discrimi(cid:173)
`nate among node-po itive patients on the basis ofHER-2/neu gene
`
`A
`a
`
`B
`30
`
`b
`
`c
`
`d
`
`e
`
`g
`
`h
`
`m n
`
`o
`
`p
`
`31
`
`32
`
`33
`
`34
`
`35
`
`36
`
`37
`
`38
`
`39
`
`40
`
`amplification. It is well known that the number of positive nodes is
`the best progno tic factor for clisease recurrence and survival in
`patients with breast cancer (29). Given the correlation between
`number of nodes positive and HER-2/neu amplification, one might
`preclict that amplification of this gene might also have some
`prognostic value.
`o long-term follow-up data, however, were
`available on the l 03 patients analyzed in the initial study. For this
`reason a second study was conducted on 100 breast cancer sample
`from patients with positive axillary lymph nodes. All of the informa(cid:173)
`tion available for the first group of I 03 patients was available for
`these patients. ln adclition, relapse and urvival information was
`available, since these cases had a meclian foUow-up of 46 month
`( range 24 to 86 months). Of these l 00 samples, 86 yielded ufficient
`D A for rudy. Amplification of the HER-2/ntt, gene was mea(cid:173)
`sured as in the initial survey, and examples of tumors from this srudy
`are shown (Fig. 1). Amplification was found in 34/86 (40%) of
`these patients. For this larger sample of node-positive patients,
`several statistically significant or nearly significant relationship were
`observed. In agreement with the preliminary urvey, there was an
`association between number of involved lymph nodes and HER-2/
`,1eu amplification (Table 2). In adclition, the presence of gene
`amplification was correlated with estrogen receptor starus and size
`of primary rumor (Table 2). Together, these two surveys yielded
`data on 189 patients and the association of HER-2/neu amplifica(cid:173)
`tion with various clisease parameters in the combined group is
`shown in Table 3.
`While these correlations were of interest, the strong relationship
`
`1.0
`
`~ 0.8
`~
`~ 0.6
`a.
`J 0.4
`i
`; 0.2
`
`0
`
`Amptllted (n : 34)
`
`A
`
`C
`
`Not amplified (n:52)
`
`Amptllted (II = 11 )
`>5 copies
`
`1.0
`:E 0.8
`:g
`D 0.6
`e a.
`
`;;; 0.4 i 0.2
`
`Amp lllled (/1 =34)
`
`Amplilied (n :::11 )
`>5 copies
`
`B
`0 + - - - - - - - -- ~~·--,--,
`12
`36
`60
`72
`84
`48
`0
`24
`Time (mon l hs)
`
`D
`
`12
`
`24
`
`36
`
`60
`
`72
`
`84
`
`ARTICLES 179
`
`Fig. 3. Actuarial curve for relapse in (A) node(cid:173)
`positive patients with no amplification versus
`node-positive patients with any amplification (> 2
`copies) of HER-2/neu and (C) node-positive ~a(cid:173)
`ticnts with no amplification versus node-posiave
`patients with greater than 5 copies ofHER-2/nn..
`Actuarial curve for overall survival in (B) node(cid:173)
`po itivc patients with no amplification versus
`node-positive patients with any amplification (> 2
`copies) of HER-2/,,,u and (D) node-positive pa(cid:173)
`tients with no amplification versus node-positive
`patients with greater than 5 copies ofHER-2hieu.
`Actuarial curves for both relapse and overall sur·
`viva! were computed by the method of Kaplan
`and Meier (44) and compared by the log rank test
`(42-44).
`
`9 JANUARY 198
`
`PFIZER EX. 1026
`Page 6
`
`

`

`between HER-2/11t11 amplification and nodal starus (P = 0.002)
`indicated that information on amplification of this gene may
`correlate with disease behavior; that is, recurrences and survival. To
`test this, univariate survival analyses were performed in which
`amplification was compared to relapse and survival in this patient
`group. A total of 35 patients had a recurrence of the disease, and 29
`had died at the time of the analyses. Median times to relapse and
`death were 62 months and 69 months, respectively. The median
`follow-up time for patients still alive was 47 months, ranging from
`24 to 86 months. A total of 71 of the 86 patients (83%) received
`some form of therapy after mastectomy: adjuvant systemic therapy
`alone, 47%; adjuvant ystemic therapy plus local radiation, 19%;
`and local radiation alone, 17%. A strong and highly statistically
`significant correlation was found between i:he degree of gene
`amplification and both time to disease relapse (P = < 0.0001 ) and
`survival (P = 0.0011 ) (Table 4). Moreover, when compared in
`univariate analy es to other parameters, amplification ofHER-2/neu
`was found to be superior to all other prognostic factors, with the
`exception of the number of positive nodes (which it equaled) in
`predicting time to relapse and overall survival in human breast
`cancer (Table 4). The association between HER-2/ne,i amplification
`and relapse and survival can be illustrated graphically in actuarial
`survival curves (Fig. 3, A co D). While there was a somewhat
`shortened time to relapse and shorter overall survival in patients
`having any amplification of the HER-2/neu gene in their rumors
`(Fig. 3, A and B), the greatest differences were found when
`comparing patients with > 5 copies of the gene to those without
`amplification (single copy) (Fig. 3, C and D). Patients with greater
`than five copies of HER-2/neu had even shorter disease-free survival
`times (P = 0.015) and overall survival times (P = 0.06) when
`compared to patients with no amplification. The phenomenon of
`greater gene copy number correlating with a worse prognosis has
`also been seen in evaluations of N-myc gene amplification in human
`neuroblastoma (32).
`To determine if an1plification of HER-2/neu was independent of
`other known prognostic factors in predicting disease behavior,
`multivariate survival analyses were performed on the 86 node(cid:173)
`positive cases. Amplification of the gene continued to be a strong
`progno tic factor, providing additional and independent predictive
`information on both time to relapse and overall survival in these
`
`51 52 53 54
`
`55 56 57 58 59 60
`
`61
`
`62
`
`63 64 65 66
`
`Fig. 4. Example of rehybridization of filter with human EGFR probe. Filters
`were stripped as in Fig. 2B, and hybridized with 32P-labelcd human EGFR
`probe (28), as in Fig. l. Shown are the lower molecular weight bands
`hybridized with 32P-labeled EGFR probe in filter-containing lanes 51 to 66
`(Fig. l ). The bands from top to bottom arc 2.8, 2.2, and 1.8 kb, respectively.
`Lane 52 is an example of a nimor showing marked amplification (>50
`copies) of the EGFR gene.
`
`patients, even when other prognostic factors were taken into
`account (Table 4 ).
`Rearrangement of the HER-2/ne11 gene was rare. Of the total 189
`rumors evaluated, three showed evidence of rearrangement, and in
`two of the three cases, the rearrangement was identical (Fig. I, cases
`77 to 79). Also, two of the rearranged HER-2/neu loci were
`amplified (Fig. 1, cases 78 and 79). The incidence of HER-2/neu
`rearrangement as determined by Eco RI digestion was too small ro
`attempt statistical correlations.
`To determine whether the phenomenon of amplification ofHER-
`2/neu in breast cancer extended to related growth factor receptors,
`all filters were analyzed with the EGFR probe (Fig. 4). Amplifica(cid:173)
`tion of the EGFR gene was found in 4/189 (2%) of the cases, and
`rearrangement of the EGFR gene was found i.n one of those four
`cases. The incidence of EGFR amplification and rearrangement was
`too small to attempt statistical correlation. Comparison of HER-2/
`neu amplification (531189 or 28%) with that of the EGFR gene
`reveals the incidence of the former to be 14 tinies greater than that
`of the latter indicating that the phenomenon of gene amplification
`is not a general one for a related tyrosine kinase-specific receptor in
`human breast cancer. Moreover, studies examining alterations of
`two other tyrosine kinase-specific proto-oncogenes 1Wl and Jes, in
`breast cancer did not show amplification of these genes (33).
`Alterations of non-tyrosine kinase-related prow-oncogenes in these
`
`Table 3. Association between HER-2/neu amplification and disease parame(cid:173)
`ters in combined survey (189 paticncs).
`
`Table 2. AssQciation between HER·2/11eu amplification and disease parame·
`tcrs in 86 breast tumors from node-positive patients.
`
`Faaor*
`
`Single
`copy
`
`2 to 5
`copies
`
`5 to 20
`copies
`
`>20
`copies
`
`Total
`
`pt
`
`Faaor•
`
`inglc
`copy
`
`2 to 5
`copies
`
`5 to 20
`copies
`
`>20
`copies
`
`Total
`
`pt
`
`ER+
`ER-
`PgR+
`PgR-
`
`S 2
`2-5
`>5
`
`S50
`>50
`
`l- 3
`>3
`
`38
`14
`31
`21
`
`18
`28
`6
`
`16
`36
`
`31
`21
`
`l
`I
`
`H omuma/ rueptur rtatus
`21
`5
`2
`4
`18
`4
`5
`5
`Tumqr size (centimetm)
`8
`3
`12
`2
`3
`4
`Age at diagnosis (Jean)
`12
`6
`l
`3
`11
`1
`Number of positiw: lymph ,wdes
`7
`5
`0
`16
`2
`4
`
`0
`1
`1
`
`65
`21
`54
`32
`
`29
`43
`14
`
`35
`51
`
`43
`43
`
`0.05
`
`0.14
`
`0.09
`
`0.06
`
`0.06
`
`t Starutical analyses for correlation of
`•ER and PgR arc as described in Table I.
`HER·21neu amplification with various disease ~cters w<r<: performed by the x'
`ten. P values were computed after combining e 5 to 20 and > 20 cases, since th=
`were so few samples in the > 20 group.
`
`ER+
`ER-
`PgR+
`PgR-
`
`s2
`2-5
`>5
`Unknown
`
`S50
`>50
`Unknown
`
`0
`1- 3
`>3
`Unknown
`
`91
`45
`73
`63
`
`31
`62
`23
`20
`
`37
`88
`11
`
`30
`51
`38
`17
`
`2
`5
`3
`4
`
`H ornw,u,I receptur rtatus
`23
`14
`6
`3
`20
`JO
`6
`10
`T,mwr siu (cmtimam)
`9
`4
`13
`7
`4
`6
`0
`3
`Age at diag,,otis (Jean)
`2
`13
`8
`13
`10
`5
`0
`0
`2
`N11mber of positive lympi, notks
`0
`3
`l
`7
`6
`l
`18
`8
`4
`3
`I
`l
`
`0
`2
`3
`2
`
`0.05
`
`0.06
`
`0.19
`
`0.11
`
`0.002
`
`130
`59
`106
`83
`
`44
`84
`36
`25
`
`60
`116
`13
`
`34
`65
`68
`22
`
`Statistical analyses for corrtlation of
`·ER and PgR arc as described in Table I.
`HER-2/neu amplification \\ith ,•arious distasc par.tm<tcrs were: performed by the x'
`'"'· P valucs were computed after combining the cases with 5 to 20 and > 20 copics.
`
`180
`
`SCIENCE, VOL. 235
`
`PFIZER EX. 1026
`Page 7
`
`

`

`4. Univariate and multivariate analyses comparing disease-free survival (relapse) and overall survival to prognostic f

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket